Skip to main content

Some NLM-NCBI services and products are experiencing heavy traffic, which may affect performance and availability. We apologize for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience. For assistance, please contact our Help Desk at info@ncbi.nlm.nih.gov.

BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2021 Mar 8;11(3):e043689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043689

Patient experiences with physiotherapy for knee osteoarthritis in Australia—a qualitative study

Pek Ling Teo 1, Kim L Bennell 1, Belinda Lawford 1, T Egerton 1, Krysia Dziedzic 2, Rana S Hinman 1,
PMCID: PMC7942256  PMID: 34006028

Abstract

Objective

Physiotherapists commonly provide non-surgical care for people with knee osteoarthritis (OA). It is unknown if patients are receiving high-quality physiotherapy care for their knee OA. This study aimed to explore the experiences of people who had recently received physiotherapy care for their knee OA in Australia and how these experiences aligned with the national Clinical Care Standard for knee OA.

Design

Qualitative study using semistructured individual telephone interviews and thematic analysis, where themes/subthemes were inductively derived. Questions were informed by seven quality statements of the OA of the Knee Clinical Care Standard. Interview data were also deductively analysed according to the Standard.

Setting

Participants were recruited from around Australia via Facebook and our research volunteer database.

Participants

Interviews were conducted with 24 people with recent experience receiving physiotherapy care for their knee OA. They were required to be aged 45 years or above, had activity-related knee pain and any knee-related morning stiffness lasted no longer than 30 min. Participants were excluded if they had self-reported inflammatory arthritis and/or had undergone knee replacement surgery for the affected knee.

Results

Six themes emerged: (1) presented with a pre-existing OA diagnosis (prior OA care from other health professionals; perception of adequate OA knowledge); (2) wide variation in access and provision of physiotherapy care (referral pathways; funding models; individual vs group sessions); (3) seeking physiotherapy care for pain and functional limitations (knee symptoms; functional problems); (4) physiotherapy management focused on function and exercise (assessment of function; various types of exercises prescribed; surgery, medications and injections are for doctors; adjunctive treatments); (5) professional and personalised care (trust and/or confidence; personalised care) and (6) physiotherapy to postpone or prepare for surgery.

Conclusion

Patients’ experiences with receiving physiotherapy care for their knee OA were partly aligned with the standard, particularly regarding comprehensive assessment, self-management, and exercise.

Keywords: adult orthopaedics, musculoskeletal disorders, qualitative research


Strengths and limitations of this study.

  • A strength of this study was using a qualitative design to explore how the experiences of people receiving physiotherapy care for knee osteoarthritis (OA) in Australia aligned with the national Clinical Care Standard.

  • A range of participants was interviewed, including males and females of differing age, occupational status and geographical location across Australia.

  • Participants responded to advertisements and/or Email invitations to participate and thus our sample may be biased towards those who had favourable experiences with physiotherapy and/or were successful at accessing physiotherapy.

  • Our sample was constrained to participants who could speak English so may not represent the experiences of people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds.

  • Physiotherapists are a primary contact health profession in Australia so patient experiences with physiotherapy care for knee OA may be different in other countries where people can only access a physiotherapist on referral.

Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is highly prevalent and a leading cause of pain and disability worldwide.1 Clinical guidelines advocate non-surgical interventions such as exercise, weight loss (for people who are overweight or obese) and education regarding self-management as first-line treatments for knee OA,1–3 Physiotherapists are important providers of non-surgical care for people with knee OA and receive more OA referrals from general practitioners than other allied health providers.4 In addition, patients generally perceive physiotherapists to be important to assist them in managing their OA and prescribing exercises.5 6

To date, there are indications that physiotherapy care provided to people with knee OA may not necessarily align with evidence-based care standards. We recently conducted a qualitative study to explore the experiences of Australian physiotherapists delivering care for people with knee OA and how their experiences aligned with the national Clinical Care Standard.7 The Clinical Care Standard for knee OA defines seven key aspects of care that people with knee OA should expect to receive in Australia.8 We found physiotherapists tended to rely on biomedically oriented assessment and would often provide treatment (such as manual therapy) and self-management strategies that aimed to address the ‘mechanical’ aspects of knee OA. The primary focus for physiotherapists was to provide goal-orientated personalised exercise. Surgery was perceived as a last resort, and patient comorbidity, adherence and desire for a ‘quick fix’ were the main clinical challenges experienced. Physiotherapists also described a mismatch between what they knew and what they did when it came to imaging, weight management and manual therapy. Weight loss, medication and surgical advice were perceived to be outside of their scope of practice. Nevertheless, physiotherapists’ reported experiences were mostly consistent with the quality care standard.7 Findings from this study provide useful information about physiotherapy management of people with knee OA but it can be argued that a patient’s perspective of their physiotherapy care experiences may not necessarily be similar to that of the therapist.

Several qualitative studies have explored patient experiences of receiving care for their knee OA from either a multidisciplinary team which included physiotherapists9–14 or solely from physiotherapists.15–19 However, none of these studies have specifically explored patient experiences receiving physiotherapy assessment, diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up appointments for their knee OA. This study is complementary to our previous similar qualitative study with physiotherapists as participants.7 In the present study, we aim to explore the experiences of Australians who had recently received physiotherapy care for their knee OA and how these experiences aligned with the national Clinical Care Standard for knee OA. Such information will help enhance our understanding of patient experiences with physiotherapy care for their condition and may help inform strategies to improve future care and service delivery.

Method

Design

This qualitative study used semistructured interviews and was based on a constructivist paradigm, where knowledge is built through active experience and interpretation.20 Qualitative methods allow for in-depth examination of the attitudes, experiences and behaviours of individuals in their natural context and can contribute to a broader understanding of medical research.21–23 The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used to ensure explicit and comprehensive reporting of this study.24

Patient and public involvement

Patients or the public were not actively involved in the design, conduct, reporting or dissemination plans of our research.

Participants

A convenience sample of adults who had sought physiotherapy care to manage their knee OA were recruited from around Australia via Facebook and our research volunteer database. Inclusion criteria for participants were: (1) met the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence OA clinical criteria1 (aged 45 years or above, had activity-related knee pain and any knee-related morning stiffness lasted no longer than 30 min) and (2) consulted a physiotherapist about their knee OA in the prior 6 months. Participants were excluded if they had self-reported inflammatory arthritis and/or had undergone knee replacement surgery for the affected knee. The final sample size was determined by the principles of data saturation, this being when no new themes emerged from the data.25 Participants provided written informed consent and ethical approval was granted by the School of Health Sciences Human Ethics Advisory Group, University of Melbourne. Interviews were conducted between December 2019 and January 2020.

Interviews

Semistructured interview guides (table 1) were developed, informed by the quality statements of the Australian Government’s OA of the Knee Clinical Care Standard.8 It defines seven domains of care that people with knee OA should expect to receive, regardless of where they are treated in Australia, spanning comprehensive assessment, diagnosis, education and self-management, weight loss and exercise, medications, regular review and surgical options for people with knee OA. Participants were reimbursed for their time with a $50 gift card.

Table 1.

Semistructured interview guide

Topic Question
Introduction 1. Can you tell me about your experiences attending physiotherapy for your knee osteoarthritis?
  • What prompted you to seek physiotherapy care?

2. Can you tell me, where did you see the physiotherapist(s)?
  • How did you end up seeing a physiotherapist?

Comprehensive assessment 3. Can you tell me how the physiotherapist assessed you and your knee problem?
  • What sort of questions did the physiotherapist ask you?

  • What sort of physical examination did the physiotherapist do?

  • What other health conditions or social factors that might affect how you manage your knee pain (eg, changing work) did the physiotherapist assess?

  • What sort of questionnaire, survey or form did the physiotherapist ask you to complete?

4. What was the main problem you were seeing the physiotherapist for?
  • How well did the physiotherapist understand the main problems you were experiencing for your knee?

Diagnosis 5. How did the physiotherapist decide that you have knee osteoarthritis?
  • What sort of tests or scans did the physiotherapist order for your knee osteoarthritis?

  • How did the physiotherapist explain/help you to understand your diagnosis?

Education and self-management 6. What sort of treatments did the physiotherapist give you for your knee osteoarthritis?
  • Can you tell me if the physiotherapist provided you with any hands-on treatment or used any machine/device on your knee?

  • Can you tell me if the physiotherapist advised you on the use of knee brace, walking aid or taping for your knee problem?

7. Can you tell me what you remember about any information/advice you received from the physiotherapist for your knee osteoarthritis?
Weight loss and exercise 8. What exercise did the physiotherapist suggest you try?
  • How did the physiotherapist consider your needs and preferences when deciding on the best exercise programme for you?

9. Could you tell me if weight is an issue for you? If so, what weight loss treatment did the physiotherapist suggest you try?
10. Can you tell me if the physiotherapist discussed with you the importance of maintaining healthy body weight for your knee osteoarthritis?
Medications 11. Can you tell me if you are taking any medications to manage your knee osteoarthritis?
  • Can you tell me if you asked the physiotherapist ways to manage your medications?

  • Is there a reason why you didn’t ask the physiotherapist about medications for your knee?

12. What information/advice did the physiotherapist provide about medicines/drugs for your knee osteoarthritis?
  • Can you tell me if the physiotherapist spoke about any injection you could get for your knee?

Patient review 13. Can you tell me how often you saw the physiotherapist for your knee problems?
  • How many times did you see the physiotherapist for you knee?

  • How frequently do you see the physiotherapist now?

  • What did the physiotherapist advise you to do if your problems get worse?

14. Which other health professional did the physiotherapist recommend you see for your knee problem?
  • How did you go with the recommendation?

Surgery 15. Can you tell me if you have considered any sort of surgery for your knee osteoarthritis?
  • Can you tell me if the physiotherapist asked you about your thoughts of having any knee surgery?

16. What information/advice did the physiotherapist provide about surgical treatments for your knee osteoarthritis?
Concluding remarks 17. Is there any other aspect about your physiotherapy care you would like to discuss?
18. Do you have anything else to add?

Individual interviews were conducted via telephone by PLT, a female graduate research student and physiotherapist trained in qualitative methodologies. Telephone interviews were conducted to facilitate participation of people with knee OA from Australia (irrespective of geographical location) and to promote a perception of anonymity in interviewees.26 Interview questions were refined following the first three phone interviews to improve clarity for participants based on experience from the initial interviews. The refinement also helped to enhance/expand the prompts to ensure rich information were collected from the participants. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim by an external provider.

Data analysis

An inductive thematic approach was used initially.27 In order to minimise over-representation, two researchers conducted the data analysis simultaneously. Following Morse et al’s approach to inductive thematic analysis (which advocates for four steps: (1) read and reread interview transcripts; (2) step back and reflect on interviews as a whole; (3) identify ideas of similar nature; (4) group ideas into themes),27 first, the student researcher (PLT) and another postdoctoral researcher (BL) with expertise in qualitative methodologies (and who is not a physiotherapist) individually read each transcript. Next, they reread and inductively coded each transcript to identify topics and initial patterns of emerging ideas. They then compared codes and grouped similar topics/ideas into categories before organising them into broader themes and subthemes. The interview data were also deductively analysed according to the national Clinical Care

Standard for knee OA. These were further reviewed and discussed with the broader research team (RSH, KLB, TE). The senior researcher (RSH) read all transcripts prior to discussion to ensure data credibility and confirmability. Analysis was performed using standard word processing software.17

Results

Seventy-six participants responded to the interview invitation but only 31 fulfilled the eligibility criteria for this study. Of the 31 eligible participants, 24 completed the interview while the remaining either declined participation or were not contactable. Table 2 describes the 24 participants interviewed. Three-quarters were female, and the mean (SD) age was 64 (10) years (range: 49–81). Participants resided in all of Australia’s six states and two territories. Most lived in major cities (79%), with some from outer regional (13%) or inner regional areas (8%). Most (67%) people reported less than 5 sessions of physiotherapy for their knee OA in the prior 6 months, some (25%) between 5 and 9 and 2 (8%) reported 10 or more sessions.

Table 2.

Characteristics of the patients (n=24)

Mean (SD) or n (%)
Female 18 (75%)
Age (years) 63.5 (9.8)
State
  • Australian Capital Territory

2 (8%)
  • New South Wales

5 (21%)
  • Northern Territory

1 (4%)
  • Queensland

2 (8%)
  • South Australia

2 (8%)
  • Tasmania

1 (4%)
  • Victoria

8 (33%)
  • Western Australia

3 (13%)
Geographical location**
  • Major cities

19 (79%)
  • Inner regional

2 (8%)
  • Outer regional

3 (13%)
Education level
  • Three years or more of high school

5 (21%)
  • Some tertiary training

5 (21%)
  • Graduated from university or polytechnic

7 (29%)
  • Any postgraduate study

7 (29%)
Work status
  • Work full-time

3 (13%)
  • Work part-time

7 (29%)
  • Unable to work due to health reasons

3 (13%)
  • Retired (not due to health reasons)

11 (46%)
Knee pain severity† 5.7 (1.9)
Pain (WOMAC)‡ 6.8 (3.0)
Physical function (WOMAC)‡ 22.1 (10.5)
Number of physiotherapy sessions§
  • 4 or less

16 (67%)
  • 5 to 9

6 (25%)
  • 10 or more

2 (8%)
Number of physiotherapist(s) seen¶ 1.1 (0.3)

*Classification based on residential postcode, in accordance with Australian Standard Geographical Classification.

†Measured by 11-point numeric rating scale (0=no pain, 10=worst pain possible), where patients rated the average amount of their knee pain over the past week.

‡Measured by WOMAC, where pain scores range from 0 to 20 and physical function scores range from 0 to 68 (higher scores indicate worse pain/poorer function).

§Number of physiotherapy sessions attended by patient for their knee OA over the last 6 months.

¶Number of physiotherapist(s) consulted by patient for their knee OA over the last 6 months.

n, number of participants; OA, osteoarthritis; SD, standard deviation; WOMAC, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index.

Six themes emerged following the inductive thematic analysis.27 An audit trail of evidence showing examples of each stage of the data analysis is presented in online supplemental file 1. The six themes identified are outlined in table 3 and described below.

Table 3.

Themes, subthemes and exemplary quotes from the patient interviews

Theme 1: Presented with a pre-existing OA diagnosis
Prior OA care from other health professionals Male, 76 years: ‘I got my MRI scan and I took it back to the doctor and it showed that I had osteoarthritis, that it was very inflamed, that my cruciate ligament resembled a celery stick and he got me to go to see the physio.’
Male, 75 years: ‘My knees got really bad about last July and I went to see a surgeon with the possible view of having replacements done. The diagnosis for both knees were bone on bone. He didn’t feel that I was severe enough to warrant surgery at that time, so on further discussion, he suggested that I go to physiotherapy to strengthen my legs. So, I went to a local physiotherapist.’
Female, 76 years: ‘I’ve had the experience with the osteoarthritis for about eight or nine years and first of all, I went to a knee specialist and then I went to a sports medicine specialist and orthopaedic surgeon. I did that for about eight or nine years and recently, I’ve been to a physiotherapist for the Good Life with osteoarthritis: Denmark (GLA:D) program*.’
Perception of adequate OA knowledge Female, 49 years: ‘I think I have a fairly good understanding of what osteoarthritis is. I understand that I have damage to the articular cartilage of my kneecap and medial femoral condyle. I have very little cartilage at all and that’s rubbing. To be honest, I didn’t need him (the physiotherapist) to explain all of that.’
Male, 70 years: ‘The physiotherapist saw the x-rays and they have training in interpreting x-rays like that for degenerative bone disease such as osteoarthritis, cartilage wear and things like that. I was well aware that I had osteoarthritis, so I don’t think he did anything to explain the osteoarthritis because I was fairly well aware of what it was on about.’
Male, 60 years: ‘It’s just basically wear and tear, and it’s really bone on bone. The surgeon explained it to me, too. He sat me down with him at his computer looking at the MRI. It’s little fragments of bone and stuff that are rubbing against each other and disintegration of your bone in your patella plus around your knee. Because there’s no blood flow in that area, it doesn't heal.’
Theme 2: Wide variation in access and provision of physiotherapy care
Referral pathways Male, 56 years: ‘Initially I went to the orthopaedic surgeon and it was deemed that surgery is inappropriate at the moment because of age and probably not severe enough to warrant a replacement. I [was referred by the surgeon to] the osteoarthritis [chronic care program). The [osteoarthritis] chronic care program† was really an intermediary or, hopefully, a step to prevent requiring a knee replacement as such.’
Female, 49 years: ‘I mentioned to my doctor I’m getting these sore knees, she said, you should try Kieser‡. I knew it was up the road, my friend went there, and my doctor said it could be a good idea.’
Female, 55 years: ‘I just chose them [the physiotherapy centre] because I knew they did Pilates and exercise rehab, so that’s why I went there. And they were close to home.’
Male, 72 years: ‘My doctor recommendation. I got on this Enhanced Primary Care Plan§ where they recommend a physiotherapist.’
Funding models Female, 60 years: ‘I had an accident at work a few years ago. I suffered quite a bit of pain and I was referred to a specialist, and he did an arthroscopy. Then I was doing follow-up physiotherapy after the arthroscopy. The surgeon did another arthroscopy and I followed up with more physiotherapy - and started doing hydrotherapy under a physiotherapist. I was doing those sessions on a regular basis. WorkCover then ceased to cover me, and so I was doing them myself out-of-pocket.’
Female, 69 years: ‘I went to my general practitioner and got the five treatments that you can get from the government for chronic illness. [With] the care plan you only get five treatments, but then I’ve got private health insurance, so I saw him under that as well.’
Female, 69 years: ‘I had ancillary benefits at that stage and I only got about five treatments covered by that ancillary benefits with Medibank Private. I couldn’t afford the ancillary benefits anymore so, no, I won’t go to a physio now.’
Individual vs group sessions Female, 69 years: ‘The most recent physio visit was with a new physio because I was having a bicycle fit, and as part of the bike fit the physio did a full-on assessment so he talked more about osteoarthritis as well. I’ve only seen him once.’
Female, 55 years: ‘I didn’t see an individual physio for individual sessions in the last 6 months. I was always in group sessions. It’s a general fitness class but it’s mainly for menopausal age group. So, everyone has their own set of problems. It’s not tailored just for one problem; it’s tailored for everyone.’
Male, 75 years: ‘I went to a local physiotherapist and they did sort of two sessions of assessment. And then I started going to regular weekly classes.’
Female, 79 years: ‘Recently this year, I’ve been to a physiotherapist for the GLA:D* program. As part of the GLA:D* program, we had to do an education program and so she [the physiotherapist] showed us a diagram of the knee and explained how different things get worn out and rough. There were six different exercises in the GLA:D* program.’
Theme 3: Seeking physiotherapy care for pain and functional limitations
Knee symptoms Female, 49 years: ‘My knees were becoming sorer and clicking as I walked, particularly up sets of stairs. And I have a lot of stairs at work. So, I thought I need to go and talk to a physio about it.’
Female, 51 years: ‘I had an ongoing knee problem and the pain was just killing me. I would be in tears with the pain. I went to the doctor; they were giving me anti-inflammatory tablets, they were not working. So, I said is there anything I can do, will physio help, and the doctor sent a referral to the physio.’
Female, 55 years: ‘Well, it was for knee pain that I wanted to go and build-up the strength in my legs to try and avoid surgery. I’ve lost capacity to squat and things like that; I’ve lost a lot of strength in my right leg and my legs have become quite bowed.’
Functional problems Female, 69 years: ‘I think she understood what my concerns were that I couldn’t get upstairs. I couldn’t drive the car because of the clutch and the knee pain. She looked at all those things and helped me with them.’
Female, 81 years: ‘I told her [the physiotherapist] that my foot turns in. I also told her that my knee crunches. I can manage the pain but going up and down stairs is one of the problems that I've got.’
Male, 72 years: ‘Well I told him [the physiotherapist], I said, look, I just want to get back surfing properly and snowboarding and skiing. I said I realise I’m 72 years old and it’s not going to be easy and they said, oh no, no problem we can do it.’
Theme 4: Physiotherapy management focused on function and exercise
Assessment of function Male, 56 years: ‘Timing or just observing, getting in and out of a chair. Walking a set distance, I think it might have been like 100 metres and they time that. And then, there was going up and down stairs and they had some sort of a measurement with that. Then, over time would repeat that and see if there was any improvement.’
Female, 49 years: ‘He watched me from a seated position to standing. He looked at my movements. We went out the back and I did a lot of walking up and down, and they had a staircase of about three or four steps, and he watched where the pain happened there. He had me practicing, in particular, the way I walk up and down stairs to make sure that through my feet, I was balancing the weight and not throwing to one side.’
Male, 75 years: ‘They were measuring how far I could bend my legs laying down and standing up. Squats. Doing steps. They found that I was bending knees. I wasn’t walking correctly, but I was doing that to relieve the pain. They got me stepping up correctly with a straight leg. I think she made a record of all of her findings and then set these exercises to hopefully relieve some of the pain and strengthen my leg muscles.’
Various types of exercises prescribed Female, 49 years: ‘He gave me an exercise program, just some gentle swinging of the knee initially, and then I built it up to other types of exercise. He had me practicing the way I walk up and down stairs, then we looked at me doing some kicking, gentle kicking with the board and gentle deep water running as opposed to doing the structured classes.’
Male, 75 years: ‘Other than exercise machines that they had in-house, there was elastic stretching band and she told me to do elliptical trainer at home and a cycle machine. I've got a list here. Its straight leg raise, bridging, clams, ball squeezes, sit to stand, lunges, calf raises ballet style, step-ups, go on the bike, and balance exercise.’
Female, 55 years: ‘I was doing Pilates, then I was doing Fit-Right classes. We did lots of clams with weights and off-weights. I did a lot of [reformer] where I sat on a spring-loaded box.’
Surgery, medications and injections are for doctors Male, 56 years: ‘I think it’s the rheumatologist or my general practitioner who would be issuing the drugs so I didn’t think that would be physio. I don’t think meds ever really was their (the physiotherapists’) jurisdiction.’
Male, 72 years: ‘The physio doesn’t want to go into the drug side of it because of the risks. Why would he change it as regards something as serious as drugs? I’d had second thoughts and the fact that I thought they’d [a surgeon] done the wrong knee. He didn’t go into that because obviously that’s not part of his remit.’
Female, 69 years: ‘The surgeon will know better about how advanced it is and I’ve got a lot of faith in him. He can give me a better idea of where I should proceed after this. Because I’ve had it before, I have got a fairly good idea of what the process will be.’
Adjunctive treatments Male, 76 years: ‘I couldn’t bend the knee very well; I was in real pain and he gave me a couple of needle sessions both hot and dry needles. He massaged the knee; he did a lot to try and bend the knee.’
Male, 60 years: ‘It’s a little bit of ultrasound, but basically manipulation. I'm always tight in the hamstring. I play lawn bowls, and if it was niggly, I drop in the physio and say listen, could you tape my knee for me, please, and they do it for me straight away.’
Female, 69 years: ‘I did get a bit of massage and a trigger point treatment to help alleviate that. We also tried, I think it’s called EMS machine, an electronic stimulation machine, to try and build the muscle at one point because my kneecap was so aggravated.’
Theme 5: Professional and personalised care
Trust and/or confidence Male, 76 years: ‘I thought he was excellent. He was one of the best physiotherapists I’ve ever seen in my life. His approach to everything, his care. Many of them can be in and out, I’m finished with you, I’ve only got so much time for you. None of that. He was extremely good, and I had complete trust in what he was doing. And when he did hurt me it wasn’t because he wanted to hurt me, he said, oh I’m sorry and tell me if that’s too hard.’
Female, 69 years: ‘I thought she was really good. I think she understood what my concerns were that I couldn’t get upstairs. I couldn’t drive the car because of the clutch and the knee pain. She looked at all those things and helped me with them.’
Female, 69 years: ‘When he gave them to me, they all seemed quite logical because I know nothing, I wouldn’t know what was good or bad for me. I trusted him because I had the condition before when my knee was bad. He also knew my background and what I’d been through, so that was good to have that kind of long-term relationship.’
Personalised care Female, 51 years: ‘I had a good say in it because every time she suggested something she would ask. With appointment times, she would always check, ‘Is this a good time for you?’ Every time she suggested a treatment, she would ask me. She was always checking back with me.’
Female, 49 years: ‘I think he has a very good understanding of my knee problem and I think he understands that better than my doctors, because he’s worked side by side with me, he’s supported me, it’s more intimate. He’s been keen to help resolve the problems, rather than doing, what I call a supermarket shelf, one size fits all program. He’s really worked hard to try and work out what’s best in my circumstance.’
Female, 49 years: ‘I also went to a gym called Kieser which is – I call it the sausage factory of physiotherapy. The person who started the program for me was a physiotherapist and guided that program, but I guess I didn’t feel that really was addressing my issues. It was building my core strength, but it wasn’t really helping my knees.’
Female, 57 years: ‘My physiotherapist knows me well. I’ve been seeing him for some time, he seems to know where my problems lie. He spent the time to look at other areas which because of my osteoarthritis in my knee, I was having problems with. So at least he looked at all those areas, so I was happy with that. He came up with a few suggestions on how he would approach it, and then we went from there.’
Theme 6: Physiotherapy to postpone or prepare for surgery
Female, 60 years: ‘I was told by my surgeon a few years ago that it would be likely I would need a knee replacement. They don’t like to do it until it’s absolutely necessary. He kept telling me I was too young. They like to wait until you’re so old you might die under the knife or you don’t get long enough to enjoy the freedom of your new knee.’
Female, 69 years: ‘We were talking about the advantages of doing it [surgery] sooner than later, but then he’s [the physiotherapist] saying if I do it a bit later then we can strengthen the muscles in my knee and around my knee, that will make maybe recovery quicker.’’
Female, 60 years: ‘I’m on a waiting list to have a knee replacement. We know that the waiting list is fairly long, so I’ll keep myself as healthy and fit as I possibly can, so that I’m able to get through this okay.’
Male, 70 years: ‘Things like osteoarthritis and physiotherapy, there is only so much that physiotherapy can do. If it’s bone on bone that doesn't replace the cartilage. All that physiotherapy can do is prescribe activities and exercises to help ameliorate the impact of the osteoarthritis because osteoarthritis doesn't go away. I've had arthroscopies on my knees, so there’s no cartilage there. But I'm reluctant to have knee replacements.’

*GLA:D is an education and exercise programme developed in Denmark for people with hip/knee OA. The programme has been adapted and delivered by physiotherapists in Australia and comprises of an initial assessment, 12 supervised group exercise sessions, 2 group education sessions and a follow-up assessment.29

†The OACCP is a multidisciplinary model of care developed in New South Wales, Australia for people with hip/knee OA, specifically those awaiting elective joint replacement surgery. The programme is a public-health initiative in tertiary hospitals and offers conservative management, including programmes for exercise and weight loss, self-management advice, psychological and pharmacological reviews and disease management education.28

‡Kieser is a strength training programme using specific equipment and was originally developed in Switzerland. The programme was adapted and delivered by physiotherapists in Australia in Kieser training centres.30

§The Enhanced Primary Care Plan is a former term for a programme now called a Chronic Disease Management Plan, which is a Medicare subsidised programme enabling general practitioners to refer patients with a chronic medical condition to a maximum of five allied health services (including physiotherapists) per calendar year.31

GLA:D, Good Life with Osteoarthritis: Denmark; OA, osteoarthritis; OACCP, Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Programme.

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2020-043689supp001.pdf (179.2KB, pdf)

Theme 1: Presented with a pre-existing OA diagnosis

Participants tended to have a diagnosis of knee OA already made by a doctor prior to their physiotherapy consultation and did not seek physiotherapists to take on a diagnostic role. They often brought knee imaging results with them to the physiotherapy consultation. Some expected physiotherapists to access imaging results from their general practitioners. Participants described a range of other health professionals they had consulted for their knee problems before consulting a physiotherapist, such as a general practitioner, rheumatologist, orthopaedic surgeon and/or sports medicine physician.

Participants generally perceived their pre-existing knowledge and understanding about OA to be adequate. They had typically acquired their knowledge from personal experience and/or from conversations with healthcare professionals prior to them seeking physiotherapy care. Often, knowledge about OA was constructed from imaging (eg, X-ray) results. Participants often described their OA with phrases such as ‘wear and tear’, ‘bone on bone’, ‘degenerative’ and/or ‘cartilage wear’.

Theme 2: Wide variation in access and provision of physiotherapy care

Participants accessed physiotherapy through a variety of care models, including consultations at private physiotherapy practices, participation in programmes specifically developed for OA management delivered in the public (eg, Osteoarthritis Chronic Care Programme (OACCP)28) and private (Good Life with Osteoarthritis Denmark (GLA:D29) healthcare settings, participation in more generic strengthening-based programmes (eg, Kieser Australia30), hydrotherapy and/or generic exercise classes (eg, Pilates/gym). Most were referred by their general practitioners or other medical specialists but some ‘self-referred’ to a local physiotherapist. Participants chose their physiotherapist by convenience (eg, physiotherapist located in the same medical practice as their general practitioner or located close to home), by following a recommendation from their friend or doctor, or based on prior experience (eg, previously consulted the physiotherapist for other musculoskeletal conditions and/or their knee problem).

Participant attendance at physiotherapy services often relied on funding being available to subsidise cost of care. Some participants described accessing physiotherapy in public hospital settings (eg, OACCP28), some received Medicare rebates for physiotherapy services in the private sector (eg, via Chronic Disease Management Plans31), while others were subsidised through their private health insurance or other regulatory body (such as worker compensation schemes). A few participants paid out-of-pocket to cover their physiotherapy costs. Participants often ceased their physiotherapy visits because funding ran out.

Participants received physiotherapy care via individual consultations and/or via group sessions. Some participants attended one-on-one consultations several times before transitioning to a group setting. Most described undergoing an individual assessment with the physiotherapist, including those who ultimately participated in group classes. People referred to physiotherapy under the Chronic Disease Management Plan typically attended individual physiotherapy sessions up to five times.

Theme 3: Seeking physiotherapy care for pain and functional limitations

Participants spoke about their knee symptoms as a major driver of seeking care, including ongoing knee pain, swelling, clicking and muscle weakness. They expressed frustration with the pain they experienced, particularly when it made them unable to move the knee or walk properly. Words such as ‘click’, ‘crunch’ or ‘crack’ were commonly used to describe other symptoms. Participants spoke about feeling weak around their knees, which caused their knee to ‘give way’ or ‘collapse’. Participants also sought care because of difficulties with functional activities such as walking, driving, getting in/out of the bed/chair/toilet/shower, negotiating steps and squatting. Some participants avoided doing sports/recreational activities (eg, cycling, surfing, running, swimming) for fear of exacerbating pain. Many people expected physiotherapists to provide treatments to relieve the pain and assist with building knee strength, as well as helping them to return to activities they previously enjoyed or were now unable to do.

Theme 4: Physiotherapy management focused on function and exercise

The physiotherapist typically assessed functional ability, including walking, squatting, getting in/out of a chair and negotiating stairs. Some participants were timed when performing functional tests, and others were asked to repeat the tests as they progressed through their treatment sessions. Participants consistently described exercise as a key component of their physiotherapy consultations. They received advice about different types of exercises for their OA, including strengthening, cardiovascular, stretching, balance and functional movement programmes. Some participants were instructed to use exercise equipment such as elastic resistance bands and/or weights to progress the intensity of the exercises. For those who were given home exercise programmes, exercise handouts or online instructions were provided. Some participants also attended supervised group exercise classes such as gym or fitness-based programme, Pilates, hydrotherapy, balance and/or strengthening classes.

Participants tended not to expect information about surgery, medications and knee injections from their physiotherapist, instead considering these domains of care as a doctor’s responsibility. Many did not see the need for physiotherapists to cover these options further and some participants felt that physiotherapists should refrain from providing any medication advice because they do not have prescription rights.

Some participants received adjunctive treatments from physiotherapists such as massage, dry needling/acupuncture and manual knee mobilisation techniques to relieve muscle tightness and joint stiffness. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and electronic muscle stimulator machines were sometimes provided to relieve knee pain and stimulate muscles, respectively. Other common adjunctive treatments offered by physiotherapists included ultrasound, heat/cold pack, taping and using a knee brace. These were typically delivered during individual physiotherapy consultations.

Theme 5: Professional and personalised care

Generally, most participants were happy and satisfied with the physiotherapy care they received. Some described having trust in their physiotherapists, both in their clinical skills and professional knowledge when managing knee OA. Most felt that their physiotherapist understood and appreciated the problems they were experiencing, and some were impressed that the physiotherapist was able to identify what was ‘going on’ with their knees. Participants were also confident that their physiotherapists could help them by providing practical advice and/or strategies to overcome their specific problems.

Participants valued the highly personalised care they received and felt that physiotherapists generally provided care that was tailored to their needs. They spoke about their physiotherapist as being empathetic and understanding towards their condition/circumstances. Some felt that their physiotherapist ‘knew them well’, which enabled the physiotherapist to provide the care and support they desired/needed. Others highlighted the value of working collaboratively with their physiotherapist and appreciated having a ‘two-way discussion’, where the participant was asked for their input in devising a treatment plan for their OA. When care was not personalised, participants expressed a sense of disappointment, describing the treatment received as a ‘sausage factory’, ‘supermarket shelf’ or being a ‘one size fits all programme’

Theme 6: Physiotherapy to postpone or prepare for surgery

Participants perceived that joint replacement surgery was inevitable for their knee problems. Many were informed of this by their doctor and some were already on hospital waiting lists for surgery. However, participants were also advised by their doctors/surgeons to delay surgery for as long as possible and some attended the physiotherapist in an effort to achieve this. Participants generally believed that physiotherapists were not able to ‘cure’ OA but could help in reducing its impact. Some described the role of physiotherapy as providing them with strategies to strengthen the knees and alleviate their OA symptoms in order to delay surgery. While some participants ‘prepared’ their knee for surgery by seeing a physiotherapist, others were keen to have surgery as soon as possible.

Alignment with Clinical Care Standard for knee OA

Deductive analysis was used to generate table 4, which summarises how participant experiences of physiotherapy care for knee OA aligned with the Clinical Care Standard.

Table 4.

Alignment of participant experiences of physiotherapy care with the national Clinical Care Standard for knee OA

Domains of care Key elements of care Patient experiences receiving care
Comprehensive assessment Assess history of presenting symptoms and other health conditions Patients expected their physiotherapists to provide treatments for relief of knee pain, to strengthen muscles and to return them to activities they previously enjoyed or were now unable to do.
Conduct a physical examination Patients described being typically assessed for functional ability (eg, walking, squatting, getting in/out of a chair, negotiating stairs). Some were timed when performing functional tests, and others were asked to repeat the tests as they progressed through their treatment sessions.
Evaluate psychosocial factors Patients rarely described any psychosocial evaluation by their physiotherapist.
Diagnosis Diagnose knee OA clinically Patients generally had received a knee OA diagnosis from their doctor prior to seeing their physiotherapist. They often had knee imaging results to bring to their physiotherapy consultations.
Consider imaging for alternative diagnosis only Patients did not touch on this aspect as they typically went to their physiotherapist with imaging results from their doctor.
Education and self-management Provide education about knee OA and available treatments Patients perceived they had adequate pre-existing knowledge and understanding about OA.
Individualised self-management plan based on physical and psychosocial needs Patients felt that their physiotherapist generally provided care that was tailored to their needs. Patients rarely mentioned any psychosocial considerations when discussing self-management plans with the physiotherapist.
Weight loss and exercise Support people who are overweight or obese to lose weight Some patients did not perceive their weight as an issue. For those with weight problems, some described having a discussion with their physiotherapist about the importance of weight loss/maintenance.
Tailor exercise according to needs and preferences Patients received advice about various exercises (eg, strengthening, cardiovascular, stretching, balance, functional movement programmes) for their OA. Some used elastic resistance bands and/or weights for exercises. Some attended supervised group exercise classes (eg, gym or fitness-based programme, Pilates, hydrotherapy, balance, strengthening classes). Some also received adjunctive treatments (eg, massage, dry needling/acupuncture, manual techniques, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, electronic muscle stimulator machines, ultrasound, heat/cold pack and taping).
Establish weight and exercise goals, and refer to other services for assistance as required Exercise goals and programmes were routinely established with physiotherapists. Patients rarely described establishing weight loss goals or being referred to other healthcare providers for weight loss support.
Medications to manage symptoms Offer appropriate medicines to manage symptoms, considering clinical condition and preferences Patients did not expect information about medications and knee injections from their physiotherapist.
Patient review Agree on regular reviews according to patient’s needs Patient attendance at physiotherapy services often relied on funding being available to subsidise cost of care. Reviews would often cease when funding ran out.
Refer to specialist if knee OA symptoms worsen and severe functional impairment persists despite conservative management Patients generally sought care from a physiotherapist to postpone, or prepare for, knee surgery.
Surgery Offer timely joint surgery to patients not responding to conservative management Patients generally sought care from a physiotherapist to postpone, or prepare for, knee surgery.
Provide surgical information to inform treatment decision Patients did not expect information about knee surgery from their physiotherapist.
Only offer arthroscopy to patients with true mechanical locking Patients rarely mentioned discussing knee arthroscopy with their physiotherapist.

OA, osteoarthritis.

Discussion

This qualitative study explored experiences of people who had received physiotherapy care for their knee OA in Australia and how they aligned with the national Clinical Care Standard for knee OA.8 Participants within this study valued physiotherapists’ ability to provide professional and personalised care and described having a strong sense of trust and/or confidence in their physiotherapist. They also felt that physiotherapists understood their problems. These findings are consistent with previous research, which showed that patient satisfaction with physiotherapy care for a range of musculoskeletal conditions was generally high in Australia and other countries such as those in Northern Europe, North America, the UK and Ireland.32 Physiotherapists’ interpersonal and communication skills are important attributes to high patient satisfaction.32 Our findings suggest that, generally, patients within this study perceived Australian physiotherapists to work in a patient-centred way to ensure that patients’ treatment expectations, needs and preferences are respected. Such care aligned with the Clinical Care Standard relating to self-management, where patients received management plan that suited their needs and preferences. These findings were also similar to our previous study with physiotherapists,7 who described offering an individualised self-management plan based on knee symptoms and signs, functional ability and goals.

Participants utilised various referral pathways and a range of different funding models to access physiotherapy care through a diverse array of service delivery options. This suggests that there is not a single ‘one size fits all’ model of physiotherapy care that will suit the needs and individual circumstances of all Australians living with knee OA. Our findings highlight how important it is for healthcare systems to offer different models of physiotherapy care, in both the public and private sectors, for example, spanning individual consultations through to group exercise classes. This helps to reduce inequity of access to physiotherapy care for people with knee OA, which may arise from geographical location or socioeconomic status.33 Indeed, a community-based survey of 1000 people with arthritis in Australia found that over two-thirds of respondents felt that they did not cope well with their condition because of the healthcare they experienced, and felt that they had poor access to medical doctors, specialists and allied health professionals.34 Allowing patients the flexibility to choose which type of physiotherapy service best suits their needs, preferences and financial situation also aligns with a philosophy of patient-centred care,35 36 and permits the patient to have some control over their own healthcare.

Our findings highlight how reliant people with knee OA are on government-funded healthcare and/or third-party payers (such as private health insurers) to fund their physiotherapy care. Participants predominantly accessed and received care from physiotherapists in private practice settings and typically ceased physiotherapy when funding ran out and they were required to pay out-of-pocket for services. These findings are consistent with key Australian policy documents, including the National Osteoarthritis Strategy,37 that have called for expansion of funding to support OA care delivery, including care delivered by physiotherapists.38 Given the chronicity of knee OA, regular reviews and follow-up are advocated to allow for monitoring of symptoms, permit timely changes to management and to support effective self-management.1 However, similar to a previous study in Australia,39 the costs associated with physiotherapy treatments were identified by our participants as an important barrier to continuing to access physiotherapy care for OA. Our findings highlight the importance of funding mechanisms for physiotherapy services to relieve the financial burden that people experience when accessing necessary care for knee OA. Therefore, it remains unclear if patients were offered regular reviews by their physiotherapist, as recommended by the Clinical Care Standard, due to lack of funding being a potential barrier to regular reviews.

Although pain was one of the important drivers of care-seeking in our participants, many also desired help from the physiotherapist to maintain or improve muscle strength and physical function. These findings highlight the need for physiotherapists to codevelop (with the patient) a multifaceted management plan that does not only focus on pain relief strategies but also incorporates interventions that target strength and assist patients to engage in activities that are meaningful to them. It is thus not surprising that participants in our study described the important role that physiotherapists played in prescribing personalised exercise and addressing functional deficits. A systematic review of patients’ perceived health service needs for OA also showed that one of the key reasons patients typically consulted physiotherapists was for exercise advice/prescription.5 Our patient perspectives about the important role that physiotherapists play in prescribing exercise align with the perspectives of general practitioners,40 41 who often refer patients with chronic knee pain to physiotherapists for exercise. General practitioners describe lack of time as the most common barrier for them to initiate exercise with their patients, preferring instead to refer their patient to a physiotherapist.40 42 Similarly, physiotherapists themselves also perceived exercise and physical activity to be their main role in the management of people with knee OA7 43 and are confident to prescribe exercises to improve knee strength and range of movement.44 However, inconsistent with the Clinical Care Standard, it appeared that patients were predominantly assessed by their physiotherapist for their knee symptoms and functional limitations, with little consideration of psychosocial factors. In addition, the management plan provided by the physiotherapist tended to overlook strategies specifically related to weight loss/maintenance. Our patient findings are also similar to our previous study with physiotherapists,7 who tended to focus on biomedical assessment and management of knee OA. Regarding weight loss advice, they generally provided education about the importance of weight loss rather than advice about strategies to lose weight.

Interestingly, participants tended to have an OA diagnosis already made prior to their physiotherapy consultation. They also believed that they already had adequate knowledge and understanding about their knee OA. This was despite the fact that participants appeared to have different perceptions about knee OA (describing it as ‘wear and tear’, ‘bone on bone’, ‘degenerative’ and/or ‘cartilage wear’) and their belief that surgery is an inevitable consequence. These perceptions and beliefs about OA are similar to findings from another study exploring reasons why patients resorted to surgical interventions for knee OA.45 Once the participants in that study had been ‘diagnosed’ with ‘bone-on-bone’ changes, many disregarded exercise-based interventions (which they believed would damage their joint) in favour of alternative and experimental treatments (which they believed would help regenerate lost cartilage). Such perceptions and beliefs about OA are detrimental considering there is often a mismatch between imaging findings and OA symptoms46 47 and that conservative management such as exercise can reduce pain irrespective of radiographic severity.48 49 In addition, as some primary care specialists are hesitant to refer patients with OA to physiotherapy because they either perceive exercise to be ineffective or lack trust in physiotherapists to provide evidence-based care,50 patients may not necessarily have been well-informed about the benefits of exercises during their specialist consultation.51 In order to maximise success with exercise interventions, these findings suggest that physiotherapists could consider reframing their conversations to actively invite the patient to share their pre-existing knowledge about OA so that any perceptions may be subtly corrected, and evidence-based educational resources shared. Physiotherapists should consider the language they use when discussing OA (ie, avoid biomedical terms such as ‘wear and tear’ or ‘degenerative’) so that they are not contributing to patient misinformation (ie, joint surgery is inevitable; OA symptoms will worsen over time), and instead provide a sense of hope and optimism for prognosis with conservative care.

Participants also did not expect physiotherapists to provide them with information regarding medications, knee injections and surgery even though these topics are advocated as important responsibilities of all health professionals when managing OA.1 52 Instead, participants generally approached their medical doctors for advice in these domains of care. This is likely because, in Australia, physiotherapists can only provide advice about over-the-counter medications and do not have prescribing rights. Regarding knee surgery, patients mainly sought physiotherapy care to postpone or prepare for knee surgery. Our patient findings are similar to our previous study with physiotherapists,7 who had also felt that surgical advice was outside the scope of practice of physiotherapy care. However, some physiotherapists described their role as preparing patients for knee surgery when they were referred for physiotherapy.

Some participants received adjunctive treatments from their physiotherapist, such as massage, acupuncture and electrotherapy interventions despite limited evidence to support their use.1 3 53 We do not know if participants specifically requested these treatments and/or if their physiotherapist helped the participant to make an informed treatment decision by discussing their limited treatment efficacy for knee OA. Patients with other musculoskeletal conditions, such as low back pain, often present to physiotherapists with preconceived ideas about physiotherapy treatment,54 and may desire ‘hands-on’ treatment or any intervention that has previously eased their back symptoms. Physiotherapists may feel obliged to provide treatments with limited efficacy in order to meet the patient’s treatment expectation.

A strength of our study was its qualitative design, which allowed us to explore the experiences of people receiving physiotherapy care for knee OA in Australia. In order to explore diversity in experiences, we interviewed a range of participants, including males and females of differing age, occupational status and geographical location across Australia. Our study also has limitations. There was no patient and public involvement in the design of this research. Participants responded to advertisements (social media) and/or Email invitations (research volunteer database) to participate and thus our sample may be biased towards those who had favourable experiences with physiotherapy and/or were successful at accessing physiotherapy. There were many more females than males in the sample which may reflect the social media approach to recruitment. Participants were reimbursed for their time with a US$50 gift card so they might have responded to interview questions in a socially desirable manner. Efforts were made to reduce this effect by informing participants at the beginning of the interview that there were no right or wrong answers to the questions asked. Our sample was constrained to participants who could speak English and given that 21% of Australians speak a language other than English at home,55 we do not know if our findings reflect the experiences of people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds. Furthermore, physiotherapists are a primary contact health profession in Australia, so patient experiences with physiotherapy care for knee OA may be different in other countries where people can only access a physiotherapist on referral. Future research is particularly warranted in low-to-middle income countries, given that social factors such as education level and income influence patient access to allied health services such as physiotherapy.56 Our findings may also not be applicable in countries where cultural beliefs differ considerably from the Australian context. The perception of pain, health beliefs and concept of disability and its management often vary from one culture to another57 and thus may influence patients’ experiences managing their conditions.

In conclusion, our findings provide evidence from the patient’s perspective about the important role physiotherapists play in the care of Australians with knee OA, reinforcing the need for equitable access to physiotherapy services that are supported by a range of funding models. Findings highlight the importance of different pathways for accessing care to meet the needs of individuals and ensure that all people with knee OA are adequately supported in managing their condition. Overall, patients’ experiences with receiving physiotherapy care for their knee OA were partly aligned with the Clinical Care Standard, particularly regarding comprehensive assessment, self-management, and exercise.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Footnotes

Contributors: PLT, KLB, KD and RSH contributed to the study conception and design. PLT completed data collection. PLT, KLB, BL, TE, KD and RSH contributed to the data analysis and interpretation of data. PLT wrote the first draft of the manuscript. PLT, KLB, BL, TE, KD and RSH revised the paper and provided scientific input. PLT, KLB, BL, TE, KD and RSH approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding: This work was supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council (Centre of Research Excellence; number 1079078). Ms Teo is supported by a PhD stipend from the Australian Government Research Training Programme Scholarship. Professor Hinman is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Fellowship (#1154217). Professor Bennell is supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant (# 1174431). Professor Dziedzic was part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care West Midlands and a Knowledge Mobilisation Research Fellowship (KMRF- 2014-03-002) from the NIHR and is an NIHR Senior Investigator. The funders had no role in the development of the study method, interpretation of the results or reporting.

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient consent for publication: Not required.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Data availability statement: No data are available.

Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

References

  • 1.NICE . Clinical guideline: osteoarthritis care and management in adults. National Institute for Health and Care Excellene, 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bannuru RR, Osani MC, Vaysbrot EE, et al. OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee, hip, and polyarticular osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2019;27:1578–89. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kolasinski SL, Neogi T, Hochberg MC, et al. 2019 American College of rheumatology/arthritis foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72:220–33. 10.1002/art.41142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Australian Institue of Health and Welfare . Use of health services for arthritis and osteoporosis. Canberra, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Papandony MC, Chou L, Seneviwickrama M, et al. Patients’ perceived health service needs for osteoarthritis (OA) care: a scoping systematic review. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017;25:1010–25. 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.799 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Dobson F, Bennell KL, French SD, et al. Barriers and facilitators to exercise participation in people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: synthesis of the literature using behavior change theory. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2016;95:372–89. 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000448 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Teo PL, Bennell KL, Lawford BJ, et al. Physiotherapists may improve management of knee osteoarthritis through greater psychosocial focus, being proactive with advice, and offering longer-term reviews: a qualitative study. J Physiother 2020;66:256–65. 10.1016/j.jphys.2020.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care . Osteoarthritis of the knee clinical care standard Sydney: ACSQHC2017. Available: https://www.safetyandquality.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Osteoarthritis-of-the-knee-Clinical-Care-Standard.pdf
  • 9.Mann C, Gooberman-Hill R. Health care provision for osteoarthritis: concordance between what patients would like and what health professionals think they should have. Arthritis Care Res 2011;63:963–72. 10.1002/acr.20459 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nyvang J, Hedström M, Gleissman SA. It’s not just a knee, but a whole life: a qualitative descriptive study on patients' experiences of living with knee osteoarthritis and their expectations for knee arthroplasty. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2016;11:30193. 10.3402/qhw.v11.30193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Smith TO, Purdy R, Lister S, et al. Attitudes of people with osteoarthritis towards their conservative management: a systematic review and meta-ethnography. Rheumatol Int 2014;34:299–313. 10.1007/s00296-013-2905-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Pouli N, Das Nair R, Lincoln NB, et al. The experience of living with knee osteoarthritis: exploring illness and treatment beliefs through thematic analysis. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:600–7. 10.3109/09638288.2013.805257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Spitaels D, Vankrunkelsven P, Desfosses J, et al. Barriers for guideline adherence in knee osteoarthritis care: a qualitative study from the patients' perspective. J Eval Clin Pract 2017;23:165–72. 10.1111/jep.12660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wallis JA, Taylor NF, Bunzli S, et al. Experience of living with knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review of qualitative studies. BMJ Open 2019;9:e030060. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hall M, Migay A-M, Persad T, et al. Individuals’ experience of living with osteoarthritis of the knee and perceptions of total knee arthroplasty. Physiother Theory Pract 2008;24:167–81. 10.1080/09593980701588326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Allison K, Delany C, Setchell J, et al. A qualitative study exploring the views of individuals with knee osteoarthritis on the role of physiotherapists in weight management: a complex issue requiring a sophisticated skill set. Musculoskeletal Care 2019;17:206–14. 10.1002/msc.1391 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lawford BJ, Delany C, Bennell KL, et al. “I was really sceptical…But it worked really well”: a qualitative study of patient perceptions of telephone-delivered exercise therapy by physiotherapists for people with knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2018;26:741–50. 10.1016/j.joca.2018.02.909 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Campbell R, Evans M, Tucker M, et al. Why don't patients do their exercises? Understanding non-compliance with physiotherapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Epidemiol Community Health 2001;55:132–8. 10.1136/jech.55.2.132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Law R-J, Nafees S, Hiscock J, et al. A lifestyle management programme focused on exercise, diet and physiotherapy support for patients with hip or knee osteoarthritis and a body mass index over 35: a qualitative study. Musculoskeletal Care 2019;17:145–51. 10.1002/msc.1382 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baxter P, Jack S. Qualitative case study methodology: study design and implementation for novice researchers. Qualitative Report 2008;13:544. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Greenhalgh T. What have the social sciences ever done for equity in health policy and health systems? Int J Equity Health 2018;17:124. 10.1186/s12939-018-0842-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Malterud K. The art and science of clinical knowledge: evidence beyond measures and numbers. Lancet 2001;358:397–400. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05548-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ong BN, Richardson JC. The contribution of qualitative approaches to musculoskeletal research. Rheumatology 2006;45:369–70. 10.1093/rheumatology/kel022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.O'Brien BC, Harris IB, Beckman TJ, et al. Standards for reporting qualitative research: a synthesis of recommendations. Acad Med 2014;89:1245–51. 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Moser A, Korstjens I. Series: practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 3: sampling, data collection and analysis. Eur J Gen Pract 2018;24:9–18. 10.1080/13814788.2017.1375091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Judith ES, Kathleen JH. Comparing telephone and face-to-face qualitative interviewing: a research note. Qualit Res 2004;4:107–18. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Morse JM, Field P-A. Nursing research. [electronic resource]: the application of qualitative approaches. 2nd edn. Chapman & Hall, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arthritis Australia . Time to move: osteoarthritis Australia, 2014. Available: http://www.arthritisaustralia.com.au/images/stories/documents/reports/TTM/Final%20Arthritis%20Aus%20Time%20to%20Move_OA_140618.pdf
  • 29.La Trobe University . Gla:D australia La Trobe University, 2017. Available: https://gladaustralia.com.au/
  • 30.Kieser Australia . About kieser South Melbourne, 2020. Available: https://www.kieser.com.au/about-kieser/
  • 31.Australian Government Department of Health . Chronic disease management - individual allied health services under medicare - patient information, 2014. Available: http://www.health.gov.au/internet/main/publishing.nsf/Content/health-medicare-allied-health-brochure.htm
  • 32.Hush JM, Yung V, Mackey M, et al. Patient satisfaction with musculoskeletal physiotherapy care in Australia: an international comparison. J Man Manip Ther 2012;20:201–8. 10.1179/2042618612Y.0000000009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Bath B, Jakubowski M, Mazzei D, et al. Factors associated with reduced perceived access to physiotherapy services among people with low back disorders. Physiother Can 2016;68:260–6. 10.3138/ptc.2015-50 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Arthritis Australia . The ignored majority: the voice of arthritis 2011 Australia, 2011. Available: http://www.arthritisaustralia.com.au/images/stories/documents/reports/2011_updates/the%20voice%20of%20arthritis%202011.pdf
  • 35.Brand CA, Ackerman IN, Bohensky MA, et al. Chronic disease management: a review of current performance across quality of care domains and opportunities for improving osteoarthritis care. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2013;39:123–43. 10.1016/j.rdc.2012.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Institute of Medicine . Crossing the quality chasm. [electronic resource] : a new health system for the 21st century. Washington: National Academy Press, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.National Osteoarthritis Strategy Project Group . National osteoarthritis strategy NSW, 2018. Available: http://www.acsep.org.au/content/Document/National_OA_Strategy_PostSummit.pdf
  • 38.Victorian Musculoskeletal Clinical Leadership Group . Victorian model of care for osteoarthritis of the hip and knee. Melbourne MOVE muscle, bone & joint health, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ackerman IN, Livingston JA, Osborne RH. Personal perspectives on enablers and barriers to accessing care for hip and knee osteoarthritis. Phys Ther 2016;96:26–36. 10.2522/ptj.20140357 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Cottrell E, Foster NE, Porcheret M, et al. Gps’ attitudes, beliefs and behaviours regarding exercise for chronic knee pain: a questionnaire survey. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014999. 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014999 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Egerton T, Nelligan RK, Setchell J, et al. General practitioners’ views on managing knee osteoarthritis: a thematic analysis of factors influencing clinical practice guideline implementation in primary care. BMC Rheumatol 2018;2:30. 10.1186/s41927-018-0037-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Egerton T, Diamond LE, Buchbinder R, et al. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of qualitative studies to identify primary care clinicians' barriers and enablers to the management of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017;25:625–38. 10.1016/j.joca.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.MacKay C, Hawker GA, Jaglal SB. How do physical therapists approach management of people with early knee osteoarthritis? A qualitative study. Phys Ther 2020;100:295–306. 10.1093/ptj/pzz164 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tang CY, Pile R, Croft A, et al. Exploring physical therapist adherence to clinical guidelines when treating patients with knee osteoarthritis in Australia: a mixed methods study. Phys Ther 2020;100:1084–93. 10.1093/ptj/pzaa049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Bunzli S, O'Brien P, Ayton D, et al. Misconceptions and the acceptance of evidence-based nonsurgical interventions for knee osteoarthritis. A qualitative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2019;477:1975–83. 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000784 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bedson J, Croft PR. The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a systematic search and summary of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008;9:116. 10.1186/1471-2474-9-116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kinds MB, Welsing PMJ, Vignon EP, et al. A systematic review of the association between radiographic and clinical osteoarthritis of hip and knee. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2011;19:768–78. 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Skou ST, Derosche CA, Andersen MM, et al. Nonoperative treatment improves pain irrespective of radiographic severity. A cohort study of 1,414 patients with knee osteoarthritis. Acta Orthop 2015;86:599–604. 10.3109/17453674.2015.1029392 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Juhl C, Christensen R, Roos EM, et al. Impact of exercise type and dose on pain and disability in knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis of randomized controlled trials. Arthritis Rheumatol 2014;66:622–36. 10.1002/art.38290 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Egerton T, Nelligan R, Setchell J, et al. General practitioners’ perspectives on a proposed new model of service delivery for primary care management of knee osteoarthritis: a qualitative study. BMC Fam Pract 2017;18:85. 10.1186/s12875-017-0656-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Selten EMH, Vriezekolk JE, Nijhof MW, et al. Barriers impeding the use of non-pharmacological, non-surgical care in hip and knee osteoarthritis: the views of general practitioners, physical therapists, and medical specialists. J Clin Rheumatol 2017;23:405–10. 10.1097/RHU.0000000000000562 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Hinman RS, Allen KD, Bennell KL, et al. Development of a core capability framework for qualified health professionals to optimise care for people with osteoarthritis: an OARSI initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020;28:154–66. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Royal Australian College of General Practitioners . Guideline for the management of knee and hip osteoarthritis. East Melbourne, Victoria: RACGP, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Foster NE, Delitto A. Embedding psychosocial perspectives within clinical management of low back pain: integration of psychosocially informed management principles into physical therapist practice-challenges and opportunities. Phys Ther 2011;91:790–803. 10.2522/ptj.20100326 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Australian Bureau of Statistics . 2016 census: multicultural census reveals a fast changing, culturally diverse nation. Australia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ackerman IN, Busija L. Access to self-management education, conservative treatment and surgery for arthritis according to socioeconomic status. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2012;26:561–83. 10.1016/j.berh.2012.08.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Henschke N, Lorenz E, Pokora R, et al. Understanding cultural influences on back pain and back pain research. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2016;30:1037–49. 10.1016/j.berh.2017.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2020-043689supp001.pdf (179.2KB, pdf)

Reviewer comments
Author's manuscript

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES