Abstract
The enantioselective palladium-catalyzed decarboxylative allylic alkylation of fully substituted α-hydroxy acyclic enol carbonates providing tetrasubstituted benzoin derivatives is reported. Investigation into the transformation revealed that preparation of the starting material as a single enolate isomer is crucial for optimal enantioselectivity. The obtained alkylation products contain multiple reactive sites that can be utilized toward the synthesis of stereochemically rich derivatives.
COMMUNICATION
Keywords: allylic alkylation, palladium catalysis, benzoin, asymmetric catalysis
Graphical Abstract

Benzoins are a preeminent motif in organic chemistry that are used as synthetic intermediates to access a variety of useful structures.[1] As a result, extensive efforts toward the asymmetric synthesis of benzoin derivatives have been reported, including enantioselective benzoin condensations,[2] reductions of α-diketones,[3] and enzyme-catalyzed kinetic resolutions.[4] However, the direct synthesis of a fully-substituted α-carbonyl stereocenter in an enantioselective manner has only recently been developed. In 2008, the Glorius group reported the palladium-catalyzed direct C-allylation of benzoins, as well as a tandem benzoin-allylation process.[5] They note, however, that performing the transformation in an asymmetric fashion proved to be challenging, likely due to nonselective formation of a mixture of enolates. Several years later, the Hartwig group reported the use of iridium-catalysis for the diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of branched α-alkoxy ketones via a stereodefined enolate, formed by enolization in the presence of a copper additive (Scheme 1A).[6] Recently, the Trost group has reported a unique strategy toward the asymmetric alkylation of benzoins via a 1,3-dioxaborole intermediate (Scheme 1B).[7] Due to the importance of this structural motif, and in continuation of recent research from our group regarding the synthesis and utility of fully-substituted acyclic enolates for palladium-catalyzed allylic alkylation,[8] we hypothesized that preformation of a benzoin-derived enolate precursor as a single geometric isomer would allow for an enantioselective alkylation process. (Scheme 1C).
Scheme 1.
Asymmetric strategies toward tertiary α-hydroxy ketones.
We began our investigations by examining the enolization selectivities obtained from various protected benzoins when treated with recently reported selective enolization conditions (Table 1).[9] While a 2,2,2-trichloroethoxycarbonyl (Troc) carbonate protecting group (entry 1) decomposes under the reaction conditions, a variety of alternative groups were found to be stable. When benzoin is protected with a TBS group, enolization selectivity is poor providing the enol carbonate in only a 56:44 ratio (entry 2). This could be improved slightly to 75:25 by switching to a benzoyl (Bz) group (entry 3). The use of methoxyacetal protecting group variants provided an additional boost to enolization selectivity with a benzyloxymethyl (BOM) group resulting in a 86:14 ratio (entry 4) and a MOM group (entry 5) providing access to a >98:2 isomeric ratio. While certain chelating protecting groups provide higher levels of enolization selectivity, we note that deviation from the standard selective enolization conditions (i.e. omission of Me2NEt) results in decreased enolization selectivity.
Table 1.
Impact of protecting group on enolization selectivity.a
![]() | ||
|---|---|---|
| entry | R | Z/E ratio |
| 1 | Troc | – |
| 2 | TBS | 56:44 |
| 3 | Bz | 75:25 |
| 4 | BOM | 86:14 |
| 5 | MOM | >98:2 |
Conditions: ketone (2.0 mmol), LiHMDS (2 equiv), Me2NEt (2.0 equiv), PhMe (5.0 mL), 23 °C; then allyl chloroformate (2.0 equiv), 25 °C. E/Z ratio and assignment of olefin stereochemistry was determined by NMR analysis.
With ready access to a stereodefined benzoin enolate precursor established, we next examined conditions for performing an enantioselective palladium-catalyzed allylic alkylation (Table 2). We began our investigations by examining a variety of ligands commonly used in the literature for this transformation. The electron deficient phosphinooxazoline ligand (S)-(CF3)3-t-BuPHOX (L1) was found to provide the desired product in a low 25% ee (entry 1). Switching to bisphosphine ligands developed by Trost and coworkers, product ee could be improved. Both the (R,R)-DACH-Ph (L2, entry 2) and (R,R)-DPEN-Ph (L3, entry 3) ligands provided the desired product in promising levels of ee (64% and 67% respectively). Switching to the (R,R)-ANDEN-Ph ligand (L4, entry 4) resulted in an increase to 80% ee, and was carried forward as the optimal ligand. A screen of solvents revealed that methylcyclohexane (entry 7) was the optimal solvent for the transformation, affording the desired product in a good 88% ee and an excellent 99% isolated yield. Notably, the catalyst loading could be lowered to 1 mol % of Pd2(dba)3 and 2.4 mol % of ligand with no deleterious results.
Table 2.
Optimization of acyclic, decarboxylative allylic alkylation of benzoin-derived enol carbonate.a
![]() | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| entry | ligand | solvent | %ee (yield)b,c |
| 1 | L1 | 3:1 hexane/PhMe | 25 |
| 2 | L2 | 3:1 hexane/PhMe | 64 |
| 3 | L3 | 3:1 hexane/PhMe | 67 |
| 4 | L4 | 3:1 hexane/PhMe | 80 |
| 5 | L4 | PhMe | 79 |
| 6 | L4 | Et2O | 82 (97) |
| 7d | L4 | methylcyclohexane | 88 (99) |
![]() | |||
Conditions: 0.1 mmol 1a, 2.5 mol % Pd2(dba)3, 6 mol % ligand, 2.0 mL solvent.
Determined by chiral supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) analysis.
Conversion over 95% if no yield from isolated product stated.
Reaction performed with 0.2 mmol of 1 mol % Pd2(dba)3, 2.4 mol % ligand, and 4.0 mL solvent.
With optimal conditions identified, we next sought to examine the importance of enolate geometry on the transformation (Scheme 2). Under the standard conditions, the desired product is obtained in a 99% isolated yield and 88% ee favoring the R-absolute stereochemistry when the starting material consists of a >98:2 Z/E ratio of enolates. Even when a relatively high 93:7 Z/E mixture of enolates is used, the alkylation product is obtained in a significantly decreased 75% ee, highlighting the importance of forming the starting enol carbonate in as high geometric purity as possible.
Scheme 2.
Importance of substrate enolate geometry
Having identified optimized reaction conditions, we examined the scope of the transformation for accessing various benzoin derivatives (Figure 1). In all cases, the starting enol carbonate is prepared as a single enolate isomer. A variety of substrates were examined showing that both electronic and steric changes were tolerated leading to excellent yield and good enantioselectivity. Substitution at the para-position showed that both electron rich and electron deficient rings performed well, with para-Me (2b), para-OMe (2f), and para-fluoro (2d) substrates yielding the products in 98–99% yield and 82–88% ee. The presence of other halides at the para-position lead to a decrease in enantioselectivity down to 71% ee for para-chloro (2c) and 73% ee for a para-bromo substituent (2e). Substitution at the meta-position led to consistent results, proceeding with excellent yield and modest enantioselectivity for meta-Me (2g) and meta-chloro (2h) alkylation products obtained in 79% and 78% ee respectively. More hindered substrates such as the bis-Me substrate (2i), and (2j) derived from piperonal showed promising results, providing the products in 80% ee and 81% ee, respectively. However, a naphthyl ring (2k) showed the limit of steric hindrance on this system with a diminished 72% ee. Notably, both electron rich substrates (2f) and (2j) required longer reaction times to reach full conversion (i.e., 48 h).
Figure 1.
Substrate scope of asymmetric, decarboxylative allylic alkylation of benzoin derivatives. b Yield of isolated product. c Determined by chiral SFC analysis. d Reaction performed for 48 h.
With a scope of the transformation examined, we next sought to demonstrate the utility of the produced α-tetrasubstituted benzoins toward further functionalizations (Scheme 3). Direct treatment of the standard alkylation product 2a to cross metathesis conditions using methyl acrylate provided ester 3 in 93% isolated yield. Deprotection of the MOM group to afford the corresponding enantioenriched tertiary alcohol 4[10] was achieved using acidic Dowex-50W-X8 resin[11] in quantitative yield. Notably, no erosion of enantiomeric excess of 4 was observed, a process that might theoretically occur via an α-ketol rearrangement. Alcohol 4 could be further derivatized via alkylation with allyl bromide and subsequent ring-closing metathesis using Grubbs’ second generation catalyst, yielding dihydropyran 5 in 88% yield over two steps. Alternatively, acylation with acryloyl chloride followed by ring-closing metathesis yields α,β-unsaturated lactone 6 in 94% yield over two steps.
Scheme 3.
Derivatization of alkylation products.
aAbsolute configuration of 4 was determined by single crystal X-ray diffraction, all other compounds are assigned by analogy. Conditions: a) NaH then allyl bromide, DMF, 0 °C. b) Grubbs II (1 mol %), CH2Cl2, 40 °C. c) n-BuLi then acryloyl chloride, THF, −78 °C.
In conclusion, we have developed an asymmetric palladium-catalyzed decarboxylative allylic alkylation of enol carbonates derived from protected benzoins. Both the use of the hindered bisphosphine (R,R)-ANDEN-Ph ligand and the preparation of the starting enol carbonate in high isomeric purity are necessary for obtaining high enantioselectivity. The obtained tetrasubstituted benzoin products can be derivatized to afford chiral building blocks containing several differentiated reactive sites poised to undergo additional transformations.
Experimental Section
General Procedure:
In a nitrogen-filled glovebox, a solution of Pd2(dba)3 (1.8 mg) and L4 (3.9 mg) in MeCy (4 mL) was stirred for 30 minutes at 25 °C, then the resulting solution was added to a vial containing allyl enol carbonate substrate (0.2 mmol) in MeCy (4 mL). The vial was sealed with a Teflon-lined cap, removed from the glovebox, and stirred at 25 °C for 12 h. The crude reaction mixture was concentrated then purified by silica gel flash chromatography to provide the desired alkylation product.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We thank NIH-NIGMS (R01GM080269) and Caltech for financial support. E.J.A. thanks the National Science Foundation for a predoctoral fellowship. Larry Henling and Dr. Michael Takase are thanked for X-ray crystallographic structure determination. We thank Dr. David VanderVelde for NMR expertise and Dr. Scott Virgil for instrumentation and SFC assistance.
Footnotes
Supporting Information Placeholder
Dedicated to our friend Professor Eric N. Jacobsen on the occasion of his 60th birthday
Supporting information for this article is available on the WWW under http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/adsc.201901281.((Please delete if not appropriate))
References
- [1].a) Pettit GR; Lippert JW; Herald DL J. Org. Chem 2000, 65, 7438–7444; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Aoyagi Y; Iijima A; Williams RM J. Org. Chem 2001, 66, 8010–8014; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Wildemann H; Dünkelmann P; Müller M; Schmidt B J. Org. Chem 2003, 68, 799–80; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Kidwai M; Mothsra P Tetrahedron Lett. 2006, 47, 5029–5031; [Google Scholar]; e) Kumar S; Kaur P; Mittal A; Singh P Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 4018–4026; [Google Scholar]; f) Bajwa N; Jennings MP J. Org. Chem 2008, 73, 3638–3641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].a) Enders D; Kallfass U Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2002, 41, 1743–1745; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Soeta T; Tabatake Y; Inomata K; Ukaji Y Tetrahedron 2012, 68, 894–899; [Google Scholar]; c) Menon RS; Biju AT; Nair V Beilstein J. Org. Chem 2016, 12, 444–461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].Hoyos P; Sansottera G; Fernández M; Molinari F; Sinisterra JV; Alcántara AR Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7929–7936. [Google Scholar]
- [4].a) Aoyagi Y; Agata N; Shibata N; Horiguchi M; Williams RM Tetrahedron Lett. 2000, 41, 10159–10162; [Google Scholar]; b) Hoyos P; Fernández M; Sinisterra JV; Alcántara AR J. Org. Chem 2006, 71, 7632–7637; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Hoyos P; Pace V; Sinisterra JV; Alcántara AR Tetrahedron 2011, 67, 7321–7329; [Google Scholar]; d) Hoyos P; Quezada MA; Sinisterra JV; Alcántara AR J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym 2011, 72, 20–24; [Google Scholar]; e) Agrawal S; Martínez-Castro E; Marcos R; Martín-Matute B Org. Lett 2014, 16, 2256–2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Lebeuf R; Hirano K; Glorius F Org. Lett 2008, 10, 4243–4246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].Jiang X; Chen W; Hartwig JF Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2016, 55, 5819–5823 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Trost BM; Schultz JE; Chang T; Maduabum MR J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 9521–9526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].a) Starkov P; Moore JT; Duquette DC; Stoltz BM; Marek I J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 9615–9620; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Alexy EJ; Zhang H; Stoltz BM J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 10109–10112; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Alexy EJ; Fulton TJ; Zhang H; Stoltz BM Chem. Sci 2019, 10, 5996–6000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].a) Li BX; Le DN; Mack KA; McClory A; Lim N-K; Cravillion T; Savage S; Han C; Collum DB; Zhang H; Gosselin F J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 10777–10783; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Mack KA; McClory A; Zhang H; Gosselin F; Collum DB J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 12182–12189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [10].CCDC-1955415 contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this compound. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via. www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.
- [11].Seto H; Mander LN Synth. Commun 1992, 22, 2823–2828. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.







