Skip to main content
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases logoLink to PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
. 2021 Feb 22;15(2):e0009197. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009197

New circulation of genotype V of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in humans from Spain

Lia Monsalve Arteaga 1, Juan Luis Muñoz Bellido 2, Ana Isabel Negredo 3, Jorge García Criado 4, Maria Carmen Vieira Lista 1, Jesús Ángel Sánchez Serrano 4, María Belén Vicente Santiago 1, Amparo López Bernús 1,5, Fernando de Ory Manchón 6, María Paz Sánchez Seco 3, Nuria Leralta 6, Montserrat Alonso Sardón 1, Antonio Muro 1,*, Moncef Belhassen-García 1,5,*
Editor: Michael R Holbrook7
PMCID: PMC7943016  PMID: 33617538

Abstract

Background

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a widespread tick-borne viral disease caused by the Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV). CCHFV has been implicated in severe viral haemorrhagic fever outbreaks. During the summer of 2016, the first two cases with genotype III (Africa 3) were reported in Spain. The first objective of our study was to determine the presence of CCHFV among patients with febrile illness during the spring and summer periods in 2017 and 2018. Finally, we perform a phylogenetic analysis to determine the genotype of the virus.

Methodology

We prospectively evaluated patients aged 18 years and older who came to the emergency department at the Salamanca’s University Hospital (HUS) with fever. Specific IgM and IgG antibodies against CCHFV by ELISA and one immunofluorescence assay against two different proteins (nucleoprotein and glycoprotein C) was done. Moreover, molecular detection by Real Time PCR was performed in all collected samples. A phylogenetic analysis was carried out to genetically characterize CCHFV detected in this study.

Principal findings

A total of 133 patients were selected. The mean age was 67.63 years and 60.9% were male. One-third of the patients presented an acute undifferentiated febrile illness. Three patients had anti-CCHFV IgG antibodies, suggesting a previous infection. One patient had anti-CCHFV IgM antibodies and a confirmatory RT-PCR. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that the virus corresponds to the European genotype V. This patient came to the emergency department at HUS in August 2018 presenting an acute febrile syndrome with thrombopenia and liver impairment.

Conclusions

We describe a new circulation of European genotype V CCHFV in Spain. Moreover, this study suggests that CCHFV is an identifiable cause of febrile illness of unknown origin in Spain. Thus, CCHF could be suspected in patients with fever, liver damage, and/or haemorrhagic disorders, particularly in people with risk activities who present in the spring or summer.

Author summary

Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a widespread tick-borne viral disease caused by a Nairovirus of the Bunyaviridae family. CCHFV has been considered to be one of the eight priority emergent pathogens for the last 3 years by the World Health Organization (WHO), requiring urgent attention in Research, Development and Innovation (R&D&I) because of its epidemic potential in the near future In this study, we describe a new circulation of European genotype V CCHFV in Spain. Moreover, this study suggests that CCHFV is an identifiable cause of febrile illness of unknown origin in Spain. Thus, CCHF could be suspected in patients with fever, liver damage, and/or haemorrhagic disorders, particularly in people with risk activities who present in the spring or summer.

Introduction

Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) is a viral infectious disease caused by the homonymous microorganism, the Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus (CCHFV), a tick-borne virus of the genus Orthonairovirus and the Nairoviridae family. This virus is transmitted to humans by infected tick bites and by direct contact with blood or other bodily fluids or tissues of viraemic humans or livestock [1,2]. CCHFV is a negative-sense, single-stranded RNA virus with a 3-segmented genome designated as large (L), medium (M), and small (S), according to size, with high genetic variability and reassortment events have been described as other mechanism to increase genetic diversity [3].To date, 6/7 genetic genotypes have been identified based on the of S RNA segment sequence homology of CCHFV [4]. Genotypes I, II and III are mainly distributed in Africa, genotype IV in Asia, genotype V in East Europe, and genotype VI in Greece [3]. Genotype VI seems to be less pathogenic than the other ones [5].

In Europe, this virus has caused major outbreaks in the eastern region [6] (principally in Balkan countries, Turkey, and Russia). However, in recent years, its epidemiology has been changing, and climate changes has been associated as one of the factors driving the circulation of CCHFV [7]. CCHF is currently considered endemic in areas of Southwest Europe since six human cases have been identified in western Spain since the summer of 2016 with 2 first cases detected being one of them by nosocomial transmission [8,9]. In 2018 a new CCHF human case occurred in Spain associated with handle wild animals and in 2020, 3 new CCHF cases has been diagnosed all of these associated with tick bite. The CCHFV genotype described from patients in 2016 belonged to African genotype III., This genotype is widely distributed in Africa and recently it has been detected in ticks on migratory bird in Morocco, then one of the possible CCHFV entrance routes in Spain is through migratory birds carrying premature forms of infected ticks from Africa [10]. The CCHFV genotype associated with the human case in 2018 consisted in a reassortant virus in S segment assuming a second introduction of CCHFV in the Iberian peninsula, Currently, CCHFV enzootic cycle has been established in some areas of Spain with infected ticks identified mainly in wild animals [11] and with high seroprevalence rates in domestic and wild animals, which increases the risk of CCHF human cases and it is necessary a greater awareness in the diagnostic suspicion.

From a clinical point of view, CCHF can present with a wide clinical spectrum, from an asymptomatic or oligosymptomatic disease to a life-threatening infectious condition with fever, vomiting and diverse haemorrhagic manifestations that may lead to multi-organ failure and death [12]. Laboratory analyses are frequently altered, with leukopenia, thrombocytopenia and elevated transaminases [13]. A strong clinical suspicion is needed in order to obtain a clear and fast diagnosis, initiate supportive treatment if needed, and activate biosafety measures to prevent nosocomial transmission [10].

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CCHFV is a cause of acute undifferentiated febrile syndrome, to determine the epidemiologic risk factors and to describe the main clinical and laboratory characteristics of the acute cases identified. In this way, genetically characterization of CCHFV in the samples was done.

Material & methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved September 7th, 2017 by the Bioethics Committee of CAUSA with the code Cómite Ético CEIC: PI9109/2017. Verbal consent was obtained from each participant. Also, the procedures described here were carried out in accordance with the ethical standards described in the Revised Declaration of Helsinki in 2013. All clinical and epidemiological data were anonymized.

Study type and sample collection

Descriptive, cross-sectional study that was carried out during the months of May to October in 2017 and 2018 at the emergency unit of HUS located in western Spain. It covers an area of 12,350 km2 encompassing 362 municipalities with a population of 331,473 individuals. All patients with an age above 18 years who came to HUS for a febrile illness without an aetiological diagnosis were eligible. Patients were evaluated by the emergency department and were included if they presented with fever without an aetiological diagnosis and 133 patients had these characteristics. One-hundred thirty-three serum and plasma samples were taken to determine the presence/absence of CCHFV by serological and molecular techniques. Details were collected from the medical records.

Immunological techniques

The antibodies for CCHFV were analysed according to methodology previous described [14]. Briefly, we used a commercial immunological kit (Vector Best, Novosibirsk, Russia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cut-off was calculated as the mean of the adjusted optical density (OD) of the negative control serum plus 0.2. All samples were tested in triplicate and the mean values were used for this study. Positives samples were confirmed by an in-house ELISA described in Dowall SD et al. [15], and an immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (Euroimmun, Lübeck, Germany)) using nucleoprotein (NP) and glycoprotein (GPC) antigens at 1:10 dilution was used to confirm the positive results.

PCR molecular detection techniques

Total RNA was extracted from the plasma samples using the QIAamp viral RNA Mini kit (QIAgen, Germany) according to the recommendations of the supplier. The RNA was eluted in 60 μL of RNase-free water and stored at -80°C until needed. Furthermore, a real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) described by Atkinson et al. [16] and slightly modified in our laboratory to incorporate an internal control consisting in a heterologous DNA fragment of 135 pb flanked by nucleotide primer pair included into reaction mix, for amplification was used for the detection of the CCHFV genome in all the samples and to confirm CCHFV positive results we performed a RT-nested PCR assay described by Negredo et al 2017 [8]. The RT-nested-PCR assayed was designed in the same gene (S) as the screening method but in a different genomic region.

Positive acute or previous cases of CCHFV

Acute cases were defined as the presence of confirmed IgM (by at least two different assays) and/or positive RT-PCR. Previous cases were characterized by the presence of IgG antibodies confirmed by two of the performed tests in the absence of markers of acute infection. Cases with a single IgG positive result, not confirmed by any other assay, were considered as indeterminate.

DNA sequencing

Two fragments of 527pb and 314 pb from S viral segment were obtained with two RT- semi nested PCR assays applying the method described by Negredo et al [8]. We purified amplified DNA by using an Illustra ExoProStar Kit (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, https://www.gelifesciences.com). Double-stranded DNA was sequenced directly by using the Sanger chain-termination method and the BigDye Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit Protocol and the ABI PRISM 3700 DNA Analyzer (Applied Biosystems, https://www.thermofisher.com). We used the sequencing primers of the nested PCR [8]. Sequences of each fragment were assembled and analysed by using the SeqMan Program in the Lasergene Package (https://www.dnastar.com) obtaining a consensus fragment 488 pb in size.

Phylogenetic analysis

Sequences were aligned (Muscle into MEGA X software) and a phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method based on partial (488 nt) sequence of the CCHFV S segment using MEGA X software. Bootstrap confidence limits were based on 1000 replicate.

Statistical analysis

All the data were statistically analysed using the SPSS Statistics 23.0. software (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences). Proportions were calculated for the qualitative variables and standard deviation (SD) and interquartile range (IQR) was calculated for the mean and median respectively.

Results

One-hundred thirty-three patients were included in this study. The main epidemiological and clinical data are shown in Table 1. The mean age (±SD) was 67.63 years (±18.8), and 81 (60.9%) were male. Most of these individuals presented with respiratory and genitourinary symptoms and were diagnosed with nonspecific febrile syndrome in the emergency department from HUS.

Table 1. Main epidemiological and clinical characteristics of patients.

Characteristics N = 133, n (%)
Age mean ± SD, years 67.6 (18.8)
Median age, years 73 (IQR, 54.5–82)
Male gender 81 (60.9)
Urban population 101 (68.7)
Emergency department initial diagnosis
Respiratory syndrome 37 (27.8)
Genito-urinary syndrome 32 (24.0)
Febrile syndrome without focus 30 (22.5)
Fever after tick exposure 8 (6.0)
Neurological syndrome 6 (4.5)
Gastrointestinal syndrome 6 (4.5)
Biliary and hepatic infection 4 (3.0)
Cutaneous affectation 4 (3.0)
Mononucleosis syndrome 2 (1.5)
ENT infection 2 (1.5)
Fever associated to haemodialysis process 2 (1.5)

ENT: Ear, nose, and throat disorder

Serological and molecular CCHF diagnostic assays showed that seven patients had positive results in some test. One patient (Case 1) had anti-CCHFV IgM antibodies by two serologic assays. This patient also had positive results by PCR methods (Table 2).

Table 2. Serological and Real Time RT-PCR results.

Case ELISA IgG IFA (IgG) ELISA IgM IFA IgM Real Time RT-PCR Final classification
Vector Best NCM* GP** NP*** Vector Best NCM GP NP
1 0.2 (-) 2 (+) Negative Negative 5.5 (+) 0.7 (-) Negative Positive Positive Confirmed acute infection
2 10 (+) 2.5 (+) Negative Negative 10.2 (+) 0.8 (-) Negative Negative Negative Confirmed previous infection (Undetermined acute infection)
3 10 (+) 9 (+) Negative Negative 0.02 Negative Confirmed previous infection
4 1 (+) 1.3 (+) Negative Negative 0.01 Negative Confirmed previous infection
5 3.3 (+) 0.9 (+/-) Negative Negative 0.01 Negative Indeterminate previous infection
6 1.7 (+) 0.6 (-) Negative Negative 0.01 Negative Negative
7 1.9 (+) 0.1 (-) Negative Negative 0.03 Negative Negative

* NCM: National Centre of Microbiology

** GP: Glycoprotein

*** NP: Nucleoprotein

Case 2 also presented IgM positive results by VectorBest EIA, but not confirmed by the other performed analysis and the result by PCR was negative. However, cases 2 3 and 4 had anti-CCHFV IgG confirmed by 2 or more of the performed assays, indicating previous infection. Finally, 3 patients (case 5, 6 and 7) presented a positive result for IgG in one assay while an undetermined result was obtained in another assay, being classified as indeterminate.

In case 1, the PCR confirmatory assay amplified a fragment of S genomic segment and the sequences showed 98% identity with Russian 4495-ST-2008 strain of European origin. The phylogenetic tree based on this sequence grouped with European genotype V (Fig 1), thus a new genotype was detected in human in Spain. Complete genome sequence was not possible because of low amounts of sample but we obtained with Next Generation Sequencing techniques short fragments of M and L segments that showed 98% identity with Russian 1231-CR/TI-2015 strain and 99% with Kosova Hoti strain respectively both belonged to genotype V. This data confirms that the new CCHFV detected in human is not result from reassortment events, all 3 genomic segments belonged to genotype V indicating that the samples from this case (Salamanca Spain 2018, case 1) belong to European genotype V. It is the first time that this genotype is described in human infected with CCHFV in Western Europe.

Fig 1. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the neighbor-joining (NJ) method and based on partial (488 nt) sequences of the CCHFV S segment.

Fig 1

Numbers in the right indicate bootstrap values for the groups. Triangles indicate Spanish strain and the new CCHFV strain Salamanca 2018 described here is shown in bold and are named by locality sampling site, geographic origin, and sampling year; other sequences are named by GenBank accession number, strain, geographic origin, and sampling year. Scale bar indicates nucleotide substitution per site. Genotypes are indicated in roman numerals, named according to (Carrol 2010) with the equivalent clade nomenclature according to (Chamberlain 2005) indicated in brackets: I-West Africa (Africa 1); II-Central Africa (Africa 2); III-South and West Africa (Africa 3); IV-Middle East/Asia, divided in two groups corresponding to groups Asia 1 y Asia 2; V-Europe/Turkey (Europe 1); VI-Greece (Europe 2).

The main clinical data of patients with acute and previous CCHF are described in Table 3.

Table 3. Main clinical and laboratory data of patients with CCHFV.

Acute infection by CCHFV, N = 1 Previous infection by CCHFV, N = 3
Age mean ± SD, years 53 68 ± 28.2
Sex Male 2 males / 1 female
Urban population Yes 2/3
Comorbidity Non 2/3 arterial hypertension
1/3 chronic renal failure, hypothyroidism, depressive syndrome, dyslipidemia and stroke
1/3 essential thrombocytosis
First clinical diagnosis Acute viral hepatitis 2/3 genitourinary tract infection
1/3 acute pancreatitis
Range fever duration, days 5–10 3–7
Chills Yes 2/3
Abdominal pain Non 1/3
Cutaneous signs (suggesting tick bite) Leg sore 0
Muscles soreness Leg myalgias 1/3
Any bleeding symptomatology Non Non
Risk factors Cattle husbandry Non
Laboratory data
Hemogram, ±SD
Haemoglobin, g/dL 14.1 9.6 ± 2.4
White blood cells, x 103/mm3 3.1 7.0 ± 1.9
Polymorphonuclear leukocytes x 103/mm3 8.1 5.4 ± 1.5
Lymphocytes x 103/mm3 3.6 1.1 ± 5.6
Platelets, x 103/mm3 41 207.6 ± 158.5
Liver function tests, ±SD
C-Reactive Protein (CRP), mg/L 15.16 20.2 ± 15.5
Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time, sec 43.8 34.2 ± 5.1
Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST), U/L 347 151.3 ± 110.2
Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT), U/L 161 74.7 ± 50.1

The patient with confirmed acute CCHF was a 53-years-old man, involved in cattle husbandry in Béjar, Salamanca province (coordinates: 40.38641 latitude -5.76341 longitude), a small city with 12,961 inhabitants, near to the Portuguese border. He presented in the emergency department of HUS at the beginning of August 2018 with a history of fever of 5 days, chills, mouth ulcerations (but not any haemorrhagic oral bullae) and acute leg myalgias with no bleeding symptomatology. Laboratory analysis revealed leukopenia, thrombopenia, increase of transaminases with an anicteric cholestasis, and prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time. Also, a hemophagocytic syndrome was raised in order of the presence of hyperferritinemia (>10,000 ng/mL), hypertriglyceridemia and increase of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH). Also, it is important to asseverate that no nosocomial cases were reported.

Discussion

In this study a new acute CCHF case has been detected in Spain, being 7 CCHF cases since the causative agent was discovered in this country. CCHFV was found in Western Spain for the first time in 2010, in ticks (Hyalomma lusitanicum) feeding on wild animals in the province of Cáceres [17] bordering on the north with the province of Salamanca, where this study was performed. The first human autochthonous case of CCHF was reported in this geographical zone six years ago, and even so, until now the diagnosis of this disease was not suspected [8]. Surveillance studies on West, South and Central areas of Spain, all with Hyalomma spp presence, showed endemic CCHFV circulation [11,18] in this European region and thus increasing the risk of illness cases [11].

This study was performed to determine whether CCHFV could be a cause of acute non-specific febrile syndrome in Spanish emergency departments. To our knowledge, this study is the first conducted in Spain with this purpose. Our results showed that seven of the 133 enrolled patients presented at least one diagnostic marker for ancient contact with the CCHFV, and this result could be confirmed by a second serologic method in four of them. In terms of the impact of the disease, we found an elevated incidence and prevalence, with 0.75% (1/133) of acute patients who were IgM-positive and with positive RT-PCR test and an additional 2.2% (3/133) of patients who were IgG positive, suggesting previous infections. According to these results, testing for CCHFV in Spain, should be performed in geographical areas with CCHFV enzootic cycles, Central South western Spain where other tick-borne diseases such as Lyme disease, tularaemia, babesiosis or anaplasmosis, that have a lower incidence, are suspected [19,20]. The viral nucleic acids amplified in the blood of the patient showed the greatest genetic identity with viruses of the European genotype V, a recently genotype described in ticks in Spain [18] instead of African 3 genotype described previously [8,12]. The new CCHFV genotype V detected in ticks and human in two distant geographical area reveals the expansion of this virus and the possible establishment of a transmission cycle of CCHFV genotype V in our country. It was not possible to obtain complete genome sequence of this viruses probably due to the low viral load in the sample. The cycle threshold for this sample was >30 and it is described that mild illness cases can have low viral load [21].

Our positive acute case was a middle-aged male, involved in livestock husbandry, without a history of travel to Eastern Europe. Clinical characteristics were a history of fever, chills, myalgias, with thrombopenia and prolongated coagulation times, with no evidence of bleeding or hepatomegaly. These features are similar to those found in previous studies conducted in other endemic countries such as Georgia and Bulgaria [2122]. The main differences found between our patient with acute CCHFV and those reported in other endemic countries were the lack of any bleeding history or bleeding stigma and the lack of hepatomegaly or splenomegaly at the clinical examination.

According to our data, patients with CCHFV infections could present to the emergency department with a febrile syndrome, with thrombopenia, prolongated coagulation times, elevated transaminases levels, even without any haemorrhagic signs or symptoms. Spanish physicians should have this clinical suspicion when they face a patient with a similar clinical picture with history of contact with animals or ticks in geographical areas with CCHFV enzootic cycles, Central and South western Spain, and mainly especially in the period between May and October when the vectors of the disease, Hyalommas spp have active transmission cycles. All of this in order to rapidly start the supportive and biosafety measures, to avoid complications linked to the patient morbidity, and the possible nosocomial outbreaks [12,23].

Our hypothesis is that this novel variant of the virus was introduced in the Spanish territory by livestock displacement through (legal or illegal) animal trade from zones of East, Centre Europe to Spain. Although, it is known that African III genotype was introduced in our territory by migratory birds from Western Africa [10]. So far, principal direction of bird migration is north-south, and birds from Eastern countries of Europe fly in autumn through Turkey to reach Africa, however, the possibility of the introduction of the genotype V by migratory birds cannot be completely ruled out. Further studies should be carried out in order to clarify how this novel strain has reach the Spanish territory.

Conclusion

A CCHFV of genotype V was described in human from Spain in a retrospective new case of CCHF. This study suggests that CCHF is an identifiable cause of non-specific febrile illness in Spain; therefore, it is mandatory to suspect this disease when a patient comes to the emergency department with fever, thrombocytopenia and transaminase elevation, especially in spring and summer, and when patients have an occupational risk, following the protocols already established for this purpose. All of this is intended to initiate supportive treatment and isolation measures as soon as possible, thus reducing the mortality risk and avoiding the risk of a nosocomial outbreak.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Funding Statement

"This study was supported by the Institute of Health Carlos III, ISCIII, Spain (www.isciii.es) RICET, RD16/0027/0018 and RD16CIII/0003/0003 CNM/ISCIII-D, with European Union co-financing by FEDER (Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional) ‘Una manera de hacer Europa’ to LMA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Bente DA, Forrester NL, Watts DM, McAuley AJ, Whitehouse CA, Bray M. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever: history, epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical syndrome and genetic diversity. Antiviral Res [Internet]. 2013. October [cited 2017 Feb 19];100(1):159–89. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166354213001939 10.1016/j.antiviral.2013.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Whitehouse CA. Crimean Congo hemorrhagic fever. Antiviral Res [Internet]. 2004. December [cited 2017 Feb 19];64(3):145–60. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15550268 10.1016/j.antiviral.2004.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Deyde VM, Khristova ML, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG, Nichol ST. Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus genomics and global diversity. J Virol [Internet]. 2006. September 1 [cited 2019 Apr 18];80(17):8834–42. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16912331 10.1128/JVI.00752-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Carroll SA, Bird BH, Rollin PE, Nichol ST. Ancient common ancestry of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2010. June;55(3):1103–10. 10.1016/j.ympev.2010.01.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Papa A, Chaligiannis I, Kontana N, Sourba T, Tsioka K, Tsatsaris A, et al. A novel AP92-like Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus strain, Greece. Ticks Tick Borne Dis [Internet]. 2014. September 1 [cited 2018 Jan 26];5(5):590–3. Available from: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Leblebicioglu H. Crimean–Congo haemorrhagic fever in Eurasia. Int J Antimicrob Agents [Internet]. 2010. November [cited 2017 Mar 13];36:S43–6. Available from: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S092485791000261X 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.López R, Molina R. Cambio climático en España y riesgo de enfermedades infecciosas y parasitarias transmitidas por artrópodos y roedores. Rev Esp Salud Publica [Internet]. 2005. [cited 2019 Apr 6];79(2):177–90. Available from: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?pid=S1135-57272005000200006&script=sci_abstract&tlng=es 10.1590/s1135-57272005000200006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Negredo A, de la Calle-Prieto F, Palencia-Herrejón E, Mora-Rillo M, Astray-Mochales J, Sánchez-Seco MP, et al. Autochthonous Crimean–Congo Hemorrhagic Fever in Spain. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2017. July 13 [cited 2017 Jul 23];377(2):154–61. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615162 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ministerio de Sanidad Consumo y Bienestar Social. Informe de situación y evaluación del riesgo de transmisión de Fiebre Hemorrágica de Crimea-Congo en España [Internet]. Spain: Dirección General de Salud Pública, Calidad e Innovación; 2019. Available from: https://www.riojasalud.es/f/rs/docs/ACTUALIZACIÓN_ER_FHCC_Julio_2019.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Palomar AM, Portillo A, Santibáñez P, Mazuelas D, Arizaga J, Crespo A, et al. Crimean-congo hemorrhagic fever virus in ticks from migratory birds, Morocco. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2013. February [cited 2020 Feb 16];19(2):260–3. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23347801 10.3201/eid1902.121193 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Negredo A, Habela MÁ, Ramírez de Arellano E, Diez F, Lasala F, López P, et al. Survey of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Enzootic Focus, Spain, 2011–2015. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2019. June [cited 2019 May 27];25(6):1177–84. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31107219 10.3201/eid2506.180877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ergönül O. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever. Lancet Infect Dis. 2006. April;6(4):203–14. 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70435-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mostafavi E, Pourhossein B, Chinikar S. Clinical symptoms and laboratory findings supporting early diagnosis of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever in Iran. J Med Virol [Internet]. 2014. July [cited 2019 Jun 6];86(7):1188–92. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24619972 10.1002/jmv.23922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Monsalve Arteaga L, Muñoz Bellido J, Vieira Lista C, Vicente Santiago B, Fernández Soto P, Bas, I et al. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus-specific antibody detection in blood donors, Castile-León, Spain, summer 2017 and 2018. Eurosurveillance. 2020. March 12;25(10):1900507. do JLM, et al. Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus-specific antibody detection in blood donors, Castile-León, Spain, summer 2017 and 2018. Eurosurveillance. 2020 Mar 12;25(10):1900507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Dowall SD, Richards KS, Graham VA, Chamberlain J, Hewson R. Development of an indirect ELISA method for the parallel measurement of IgG and IgM antibodies against Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever (CCHF) virus using recombinant nucleoprotein as antigen. J Virol Methods. 2012;179(2):335–41. 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.11.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Atkinson B, Chamberlain J, Logue CH, Cook N, Bruce C, Dowall SD, et al. Development of a Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus. Vector-Borne Zoonotic Dis [Internet]. 2012. September [cited 2019 Jun 26];12(9):786–93. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22217175 10.1089/vbz.2011.0770 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Estrada-Peña A, Palomar AM, Santibáñez P, Sánchez N, Habela MA, Portillo A, et al. Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus in Ticks, Southwestern Europe, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis [Internet]. 2012 January [cited 2017 Feb 19];18(1):179–80. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22261502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moraga-Fernandez A, Royo-Hernandez L, Habela MA, Ruiz Fons F, Calero-Bernal R, Gortazar C, et al. Detection of New Crimean-Congo Hemorrhagic Fever Virus Genotypes in Ticks Feeding on Deer and Wild Boar, Spain. Transbound Emerg Dis [Internet]. 2020. March 24 [cited 2020 Jul 30];Preprint. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3314445 10.1111/tbed.13756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ministerio de Sanidad Consumo e Igualdad. Sociedad Española de Medicina Tropical y Salud Internacional. Sociedad Española de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología Clínica. Guía de actuación ante picadura de garrapata; [Internet]. Spain; 2016. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/profesionales/saludPublica/enfermedadesEmergentes/Crimea_Congo/docs/Guia_actuacion_picadura_garrapata_20161014.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vázquez-López ME, Pego-Reigosa R, Díez-Morrondo C, Castro-Gago M, Díaz P, Fernández G, et al. Epidemiología de la enfermedad de Lyme en un área sanitaria del noroeste de España. Gac Sanit [Internet]. 2015. May [cited 2019 Aug 17];29(3):213–6. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25726250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kuchuloria T, Imnadze P, Chokheli M, Tsertsvadze T, Endeladze M, Mshvidobadze K, et al. Viral hemorrhagic fever cases in the country of Georgia: Acute Febrile Illness Surveillance Study results. Am J Trop Med Hyg [Internet]. 2014. August [cited 2018 Nov 5];91(2):246–8. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24891463 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0460 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Christova I, Younan R, Taseva E, Gladnishka T, Trifonova I, Ivanova V, et al. Hemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome and Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever as causes of acute undifferentiated febrile illness in Bulgaria. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis [Internet]. 2013. March [cited 2017 Nov 16];13(3):188–92. Available from: http://online.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/vbz.2011.0938 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Fletcher TE, Gulzhan A, Ahmeti S, Al-Abri SS, Asik Z, Atilla A, et al. Infection prevention and control practice for Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever—A multi-center cross-sectional survey in Eurasia. Ciccozzi M, editor. PLoS One [Internet]. 2017. September 8 [cited 2019 Nov 10];12(9):e0182315. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182315 10.1371/journal.pone.0182315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009197.r001

Decision Letter 0

Michael R Holbrook, Dennis A Bente

13 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Belhassen-García,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "New circulation of genotype V of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in humans from Spain." for consideration at PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email.  

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. 

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Dennis A. Bente, D.V.M., Ph.D.

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Dennis Bente

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Key Review Criteria Required for Acceptance?

As you describe the new analyses required for acceptance, please consider the following:

Methods

-Are the objectives of the study clearly articulated with a clear testable hypothesis stated?

-Is the study design appropriate to address the stated objectives?

-Is the population clearly described and appropriate for the hypothesis being tested?

-Is the sample size sufficient to ensure adequate power to address the hypothesis being tested?

-Were correct statistical analysis used to support conclusions?

-Are there concerns about ethical or regulatory requirements being met?

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: An retrospective epistudy of sera was collected from various areas in Spain from folks that had any clinical presentations included in a typical CCHF case definition. These sera were screened using various antigenic and nucleic methods (ELISA/PCR/Sanger etc.,) which revealed four retrospective cases of CCHF. The virus was interestingly typed to the European clade, suggesting that both circulating African clade and European clade viruses were present and infecting both ticks and humans within Spanish borders.

Methods are appropriate for the study aims. This reviewer would recommend to including the type of reagents used in the in-house ELISA and IFA assay used for detection? What were the antigens or antibodies utilized as well as the methodologies?

--------------------

Results

-Does the analysis presented match the analysis plan?

-Are the results clearly and completely presented?

-Are the figures (Tables, Images) of sufficient quality for clarity?

Reviewer #1: Results are clearly presented and decision workflow for positive and negative samples clearly laid out.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Conclusions

-Are the conclusions supported by the data presented?

-Are the limitations of analysis clearly described?

-Do the authors discuss how these data can be helpful to advance our understanding of the topic under study?

-Is public health relevance addressed?

Reviewer #1: Conclusions are supported.

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

--------------------

Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications?

Use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity. If the only modifications needed are minor and/or editorial, you may wish to recommend “Minor Revision” or “Accept”.

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Accept, however, minor editing throughout would enhance clarity; this reviewer recommends having the manuscript submitted to an English/grammar proofreading service.

--------------------

Summary and General Comments

Use this section to provide overall comments, discuss strengths/weaknesses of the study, novelty, significance, general execution and scholarship. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. If requesting major revision, please articulate the new experiments that are needed.

Reviewer #1: Manuscript is well written with only minor editing for grammar and clarity needed. Authors interestingly identified a novel strain of CCHFV that until now was not known to be circulating in Spain. This conclusions is well supported by their phylogenetic analysis which strongly argues against this identified strain being a descendant of already known strains in Spain. Their data also suggests multiple introductions of CCHFV into Spain, an important finding that highlights the continued spread of CCHFV.

Minor comments:

The positive acute case was associated with cattle husbandry and the virus clusters with Turkey, Kosovo and Russian strains of CCHFV. Is there any movement of cattle between these regions and does the patient have any history of travel to these regions? If not can authors speculate on how CCHFV from this region spread to Spain? Are there migratory birds that travel between these regions? Livestock trade?

Patient population presented with an undifferentiated febrile illness and only one patient was positive for CCHFV. Do authors have any data on what the rest of the patients had?

Line 288 is missing a reference.

Authors state that their qRT-PCR was modified to include an internal control. What was this control?

Reviewer #2: This work represents very forward thinking clinical sciences. It is of great relevance to the geographic area in terms of understanding the past and likely future burden of clinical CCHF.

--------------------

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009197.r003

Decision Letter 1

Michael R Holbrook, Dennis A Bente

2 Feb 2021

Dear Dr. Belhassen-García,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'New circulation of genotype V of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in humans from Spain.' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Michael R Holbrook, PhD

Associate Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Dennis Bente

Deputy Editor

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

***********************************************************

PLoS Negl Trop Dis. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009197.r004

Acceptance letter

Michael R Holbrook, Dennis A Bente

17 Feb 2021

Dear Dr. Belhassen-García,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "New circulation of genotype V of Crimean-Congo haemorrhagic fever virus in humans from Spain.," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Editorial, Viewpoint, Symposium, Review, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript will be published online unless you opted out of this process. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases.

Best regards,

Shaden Kamhawi

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Paul Brindley

co-Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: letterPlosNTD.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript.


    Articles from PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES