Abstract
Bamboo fibers (BF) treated in 1.3 Molar NaOH and particulate coconut shell (PCS) sieved to − 45 µm were incorporated into polyvinyl chloride (PVC) matrix towards improving the properties of PVC composite for ceiling boards and insulating pipes which sags and degrade with time needing improvement in properties. The process was carried out via compression moulding applying 0.2 kPa pressure and carried out at a temperature of 170 °C. Composites developed were grouped according to their composition. Groups A, B, C, and D were infused with 2, 4, 6 and 8 wt% PCS at constant amount, respectively. Each group was intermixed with a varying proportions of BF (0–30 wt% at 5% interval). Tests carried out on the samples produced revealed that the yield strength, modulus of elasticity, flexural strength, modulus of rupture were enhanced with increasing BF proportion from 0 to 30 wt% BF at 2 wt% constant PCS input. Thermal and electrical properties trended downward as the fiber content reduced even as the hardness was enhanced with PCS/BF intermix which was also reflected in the wear loss index. Impact strength was highest on the infix of 4 wt% PCS and 15 wt% BF. Compressive strength was better boasted with increasing fiber and PCS amount but 8 wt% PCS amounted to depreciation in trend. It was generally observed that PCS performed optimally at 2 wt% incorporation while beyond that resulted in lowering of strength. Blending of the two variable inputs; 0–30 wt% BF and 2 wt% PCS presented better enhancement in properties.
Subject terms: Materials science, Structural materials, Engineering, Civil engineering
Introduction
In recent years, composites are designed to achieve certain configurations and requirements (for structural, electronic packaging, automobile, aerospace, and household applications). These composites possess improved strength to weight properties, low density, and they are relatively cheap. Owing to increase in the amount of composite materials being adopted globally, researches are being tailored towards the development of biodegradable filler reinforced composites. Bio-fillers possess improved specific strength and modulus and impact as a measure of resistance to crack propagation when used as reinforcements in a polymer matrix. In addition, the overall cost of composite production is reduced1–3.
Composites materials are engineered by the combination of two or more distinct constituents, where one of the constituents is referred to as the matrix material and the other is known as the reinforcing material. Additionally, embedding of the reinforcing phase into the matrix material is done at a macroscopic scale. The distinct phases maintain their inherent physical and chemical properties. Matrix material serves the role of shielding the fibers from chemical and environmental attacks (like sunlight, heat, and moisture). They keep the fibers in place while ensuring effective load transfer among fiber strands. The toughness of the composite formed depends on the type of matrix adopted4,5. In addition, the matrix gives aesthetic value and good surface finish to the developed composite. On the other hand, the reinforcing phases could serve as the major load carrying component6.
Numerous studies have highlighted the importance of various bio-fillers (majorly from agro-products) and their environmental advantages which include reduced consumption of nonrenewable materials and lowering of greenhouse gas emissions which in turn reduce environmental pollution7–10. Natural fibers like bamboo11, jute12, oil palm13, cotton14, and sisal15 amongst others are ligno-cellulose based materials which are environmentally friendly substitutes over the synthetic (Kevlar, glass and carbon) fibers being used in time past16,17. Other attractive properties of natural fibers are good toughness, renewability, biodegradability, cost effectiveness, good specific strength, light weight, availability, non-toxic in nature, and the tools used in processing them are not abraded18,19.
Howbeit, natural fillers possess several disadvantages such as poor adhesion with the polymeric matrix owing to their hydrophilic nature, they possess the tendency to degrade when employed in high temperature applications20,21. These fillers are usually of inhomogeneous dimensions, they have low melting point and high moisture absorption characteristics which culminate in degradation while in use. Literatures have singled out the importance of chemical treatments in reducing the hydrophilicity of natural fillers and improving the interfacial adhesion created between the hydrophobic matrix and reinforcement22,23. Examples of chemical treatments used in overcoming the aforementioned disadvantages are alkalization24,25, benzoylation26, acrylation27, silane28, and flame retardant treatments29,30.
The use of bamboo is attracting significant attention by dint of their availability, good mechanical characteristics, recyclability, and their service performance can be compared to that of synthetic fiber. Bamboo wastes have been used in the form of fibers, particulates, and ash. A study carried out by Ref.31 showed that chemical treatment of 0.5 M NaOH solution effectively modified the surface of bamboo fiber by increasing the number of sites available for mechanical interlocking with high density polyethylene matrix. This culminates in improved mechanical properties. Optimum performance was achieved at 2–4 wt% bamboo fiber addition. The research of32 studied the effect of alkali treatment on bamboo fibers at 2, 6, and 10% NaOH solution for a period of 12 h. The study highlighted that 6% NaOH showed the optimum performance for the development of bamboo fiber reinforced composite, which was also adopted in this study. The study also established the fact that mechanical properties such as fracture toughness and flexural modulus depend on fiber length. Where increase in the length of bamboo fibers was accompanied by a corresponding increase in the aforementioned properties. Thermal stability and biodegradability of matrix can be improved with the addition of bamboo fiber as reported by Ref.33 who reported improved flexural strength, water absorption characteristics. Decreased in weight loss was observed when the samples were buried in the soil. Furthermore, the addition of bamboo fiber to polypropylene showed improvement in mechanical properties up to 50% by weight of the matrix as revealed34. Considerable efforts toward improving the performance of bamboo show that the use of compactibilizers such as maleated elastomer modifier in composites shows better properties compared to unmodified samples35,36.
Contemporary studies have shown that fiber and particulate reinforcement can be combined to improve the properties of polymeric matrix by the formation of hybrid composites with precise configuration, which has been a major focus of research in the last 20 years37–39. Nevertheless, none had considered intermix of bamboo fiber and particulate coconut shell in PVC matrix; a feat implemented in this study towards property enhancement of PVC.
Coconut shell is a non-edible hard part of coconut, which is widely regarded as waste and dumped in landfills. This shell possesses good strength and modulus, it is rigid and usually grown in the tropical areas of Africa. Coconut shell in previous researches has shown the ability to improve the compressive strength when incorporated into epoxy matrix40. More so41, proved that treatment of coconut shell with 1% NaOH solution increased the mechanical properties and thermal stability of unsaturated polyester when homogenous dispersion was achieved between the matrix and reinforcement. PVC is light, with good electrical insulation, corrosion and weathering resistance, abrasion resistance and cost effective. As a result of the good electrical insulation property its used as insulation pipes in running electrical pipes, also owing to good thermal insulation, it is employed in celing board application. However, these pipes are observed to degrade with time; evident in sagging and cracking before eventual failure of this pipes. This is ascribable to low mechanical properties which can be improved by the incorporation of fiber and particulate as noted in previoud study42–44. Therefore, from the literature review and the salient properties exhibited by bamboo fiber and coconut shell particulate, this study considered it a worthwhile to study the influence of these reinforcements at varied weight fraction on the properties of polyvinyl chloride towards improving properties of PVC base material for ceiling board and insulation pipes material.
Materials and methods
Materials and processing
Materials utilized in this study include sodium hydroxide, hydrochloric acid, bamboo fiber, coconut shell, and polyvinyl chloride pellets. Prior to chemical treatment, bamboo fibers (properties highlighted in Tables 1 and 2) and shells obtained as wastes were sundried for 7 days, treated, and used for composite development. Similar to procedure employed in45,46, bamboo fiber was treated with 1.3 Molar NaOH solution, the medium for a period of 12 h and then washed with distilled water followed by sun drying for 7 days. Similar to45, coconut shell was treated with of 1.3 Molar sodium hydroxide for impurities removal after which the shell was washed in water at 50 °C and sundried for 3 days to ensure complete dryness. Sequel to this was the grinding, pulverizing and sieving of the shell using using laboratory sieve shaker in line with ASTM D6913-1747 to obtain a coconut shell particle size of − 45 µm which was used along with bamboo fiber as reinforcing materials in polyvinyl chloride matrix.
Table 1.
Properties of bamboo fibers used.
| Parameter | Length | Diameter | Aspect ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value | 20 mm | 0.25 mm | 80 |
Table 2.
Chemical composition of treated bamboo fiber.
| Composition | Amount before NaOH treatment (%) | Amount after NaOH treatment (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Cellulose | 52.3 | 58.97 |
| Hemicellulose | 23.7 | 19.5 |
| Lignin | 14.6 | 10.3 |
| Ashes and water content | 7.4 | 4.6 |
| Other | 2.0 | 6.63 |
The parameter (length, diameter and aspect ratio) for the bamboo fiber used in the course of the study is highlighted in Table 1. Table 2 higlights the chemical composition of bamboo fiber before and after treatment. Results content having highest proportion revelaed increase in cellulose content, reduction in hemicellulose, lignin and ash and water content.
Table 3 reveals the chemical composition of coconut shell powder with silica (SiO2) sharing the highest content followed by alumina (Al2O3) which are strength enhacing media, contributiong to strength of composite. Figure 1a–c show the pictorial representative of the bamboo fiber, coconut shell powder and the composites developed respectively.
Table 3.
Properties of coconut shell powder.
| Compound present | Coconut shell powder |
|---|---|
| SiO2 | 53.67 |
| CaO | 5.56 |
| Al2O3 | 11.12 |
| Fe2O3 | 6.21 |
| Na2O | 1.14 |
| MnO | 1.35 |
| P2O5 | 0.22 |
| MgO | 3.08 |
| Na2O | 1.14 |
| Others | 8.92 |
| LOI | 7.59 |
LOI loss on ignition.
Figure 1.
Pictures of (a) bamboo fiber (b) coconut shell powder c some composites samples developed.
Composite development
Cast iron moulds with dimensions of 150 × 50 × 3 (mm3) and dumb bell shape, mould cavity of 3 mm thickness and length of 150 mm were adopted for the production of specimens used for the evaluation of flexural and tensile properties respectively. Petroleum jelly was applied on the mould surfaces for easy removal of specimens. Prior to composite production, the moulds used were cleaned to remove the residual polymeric material present on the surface of the mould.
Bamboo fiber and particulate coconut shell were incorporated into polyvinyl chloride matrix in varying proportions as categorized in group A (containing 2 weight percent (wt%) proportion of CSP and varying proportion of BF at 0–30 wt%), group B (containing 4 wt% proportion of CSP and varying proportion of BF at 0–30 wt%), group C (containing 6 wt% proportion of CSP and varying proportion of BF at 0–30 wt%) and group D (containing 8 wt% proportion of CSP and varying proportion of BF at 0–30 wt%) as represented in Table 4. Compression moulding machine was used to produce pure polyvinyl chloride and hybrid BF/CSP composites. Specimens were compressed at 170 °C for a period of 10 min while employing a pressure of 0.2 kPa. Teflon sheet was used to cover the upper and lower part of the mould to avoid burning of the composites which may result from direct heating of metallic plates while petroleum jelly was applied on the mould surface for easy removal of specimens.
Table 4.
Mix proportion.
| Group A (2 wt% CSP) | Group B (4 wt% CSP) | Group C (6 wt% CSP) | Group D (8 wt% CSP) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BF | CSP | PVC | BF | CSP | PVC | BF | CSP | PVC | BF | CSP | PVC |
| Mix proportion of specimen produced at varying content of BF and CSP | |||||||||||
| 0 | 3 | 97 | 0 | 6 | 94 | 0 | 9 | 91 | 0 | 12 | 88 |
| 5 | 3 | 92 | 5 | 6 | 89 | 5 | 9 | 86 | 5 | 12 | 83 |
| 10 | 3 | 87 | 10 | 6 | 84 | 10 | 9 | 81 | 10 | 12 | 78 |
| 15 | 3 | 82 | 15 | 6 | 79 | 15 | 9 | 79 | 15 | 12 | 73 |
| 20 | 3 | 77 | 20 | 6 | 74 | 20 | 9 | 71 | 20 | 12 | 68 |
| 25 | 3 | 72 | 25 | 6 | 69 | 25 | 9 | 66 | 25 | 12 | 63 |
| 30 | 3 | 67 | 30 | 6 | 64 | 30 | 9 | 61 | 30 | 12 | 58 |
Wt% is by weight percent of PVC.
Property evaluation
Tensile properties and flexural properties
To assess the behaviour of the specimens when subjected to tensional stress, ultimate tensile strength, and elastic modulus were evaluated using the Universal testing machine (Instron 3369 Series) according to ASTM D3039M-1748 for procedure for tensile. Specimens were evaluated in commensuration with48 employing a load of 10 kg at room temperature (27 °C). Specimens with a gauge length of 150 mm as stipulated in D 638-1449 were used in estimating the tensile properties. Three specimens were evaluated and their average was presented as the result.
Flexural strength and modulus at the peak of hybrid composites developed was assessed by subjecting the specimens to a three-point bending load with the aid of a universal testing machine (Instron 3369 Series) in concert with ASTM D790-1750. Flexural properties were probed at room temperature while adopting a 0.3 mm/mm cross head speed and a constant strain rate of 10–3/s to fracture three specimens of 150 × 50 × 3 (mm3) dimension to obtain the average value for each weight fraction.
Relative density and water retention
Density of the composites developed was evaluated using the analytical weighing balance of high precision. Samples of each composites sample were measured to determine their mass and divided by its volume. Samples were immersed in a water medium of 250 cm3 for 7 days to evaluate this property. Water retention was appraised in accordance to ASTM D5229M-1251. Prior to the immersion, the initial mass of each composite sample was weighed using an analytical balance. The resulting weight gained was recorded for each day to estimate the total weight gained after 7 days.
Izod impact strength and compressive strength
Impact test was used to evaluate the toughness of the bamboo/coconut shell composite reinforced polyvinyl chloride composite. Three identical specimens were notched in a V-shape and subjected to an impact test in accordance with ASTM D256-1052 using an Izod impact testing machine. Samples were clamped and the pendulum was set at an angle of 165 ℃ to fracture the samples. In accordance to ASTM D 695-1553, the compressive strength was assessed by subjecting pure polyvinyl chloride and bamboo/coconut shell composite reinforced polyvinyl chloride composite to a compressive load. Three samples were assessed for each composition to determine their average value.
Hardness and wear loss index
Hardness of the pure polyvinyl chloride and polyvinylchloride based composites were appraised in congruent with ASTM D 785-0854 utilizing Rockwell hardness tester. Specimens of each weight fraction were positioned on the flat plate and indented using a diamond indenter to diminish the effect of surface. Specimens were indented 5 times on the surface to determine their average value which was employed for analysis.
Wear test was conducted to appraise the wear properties of the samples and for example, their sustainability in any application which involves contact and results in wear. This property was evaluated using Taber abraser (TSC-A016) in concert with ASTM D1044-1355. The equipment was operated at a speed of 150 rpm for a period of 10 min. Samples were weighed using an analytical balance prior to the test and the final weight was also recorded to estimate the wear undergone by each sample.
Thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity
Thermal conductivity was examined to determine the rate at which heat is transmitted from one side of the polymeric composite to the other. Lee’s disk apparatus was used for evaluating this property in accordance to ASTM E 153056 by appraising samples with a diameter of 50 mm and 4 mm radius. While the efficiency of the samples to conduct electric charge was carried out in concert with ASTM D 257-1457 using Agilent 4339 B high resistance meter.
Results and discussion
Tensile properties
Tensile strength
The behavior of the developed BF/PCS composite under tensile loading is as presented in Fig. 2. Variations in fiber and particulate loading affect the tensile behaviour of the composites. At 2% PCS, the tensile strength was observed to increase with fiber loading from 5 to 30 wt% presenting an increase of up to 63 MPa at 30 wt% BF when compared with 0/0 of BF/PCS. The rise may be due to coalesce of the fiber and filler particulate58. Good wettability of the particulate and BF fiber to the matrix enhanced adhesion, thereby inhibiting dislocation movement59. Incorporation of 4 wt% PCS, tensile strength appreciated in values from 5 to 20 wt% which can be linked to enhanced interfacial adhesion between fiber and matrix and proper filling of PCS. Admixture of 25–30 wt% BF and 4 wt% PCS resulted in a reduction in tensile strength observed occasioned by possible coagulation of particles (Fig. 8), of which the agglomeration point served as the region of storage of residual stress within the matrix60. Similarly, the same experience was noted when the particle portion was 6 and 8 wt%. General trend noted is that the tensile strength improved with fiber loading up to 20 wt% for particulate presence of 2–8 wt%, while it increased from 5 to 30 wt% for 2 wt% particle loading.
Figure 2.
Influence of bamboo fiber fraction on tensile strength and modulus of elasticity for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% fiber loading.
Figure 8.

Morphological SEM image of compsoites amples reinforced with (a) 4 wt% PCS/20 wt% BF (b) 4 wt% PCS/25 wt% BF (c) 4 wt% PCS/30 wt% BF (d) 2 wt% PCS/20 wt% BF (e) 4 wt% PCS 3 wt% BF (f) 2 wt% PCS/5 wt% BF (g) 2 wt% PCS/30 wt% BF (h) 4 wt% PCS/30 wt% BF.
Increasing PCS proportion beyond 4 wt% amounted to lower tensile strength. Observation (Fig. 2) made with intermix of 2 wt% PCS and 0–30 wt% BF corroborates the observations made by61–64 in which tensile strength trended upward from 0 to 30 wt%. Also, the study of65 revealed an increase in tensile strength up to 6 wt% particulate cassava peel in the presence of 4.5 wt% palm kernel shell fiber.
Modulus of elasticity (MOE)
Modulus of elasticity as represented in Fig. 2 shows an appreciation in MOE values with increased fiber loading up to 30 wt% at 2 wt% of PCS addition on account of enhanced interfacial bonding and coalesce of fibers and particulate. Incorporation of 4, 6, and 8 wt% PCS, there was an uptrend in MOE fiber on integration of 5–20 wt% BF, while a reduction in MOE was observed on addition of 25–30 wt% BF, based on stress concentration and possible friction between particles and fiber, the consequence of which amounted to lower stiffness. Authors65 achieved higher MOE when 6 wt% particulate was incorporated in epoxy, the result of which affirms our finding of this study. In this case, integration of BF up to 20 wt% gave the maximum value for all particulate additions. Presence of fibers and particulates forms an obstacle to the free movement of dislocation66 effectuating the enhanced stiffness. According to67, the enhanced MOE as 10 wt% Doum Palm Shell Particle (sieved to 150 and 300 µm) in polypropylene. The result also confirms to the observation of68 in which egg shell powder improved the modulus of elasticity of polypropylene. MOE was noted to depreciate from 20 to 35 wt% particulate in69.
Flexural properties
Flexural strength
From the plot in Fig. 3, it was noted that the flexural strength increased with fiber loading amounting to the attenuation of flexural strength on the addition of 2 wt% BF. This occurred by dint of coalesce between BF and PCS. Flexural strength on incorporation of 4, 6 wt% PCS amounted to accretion in FS value at fiber loading 5–20 wt% after which there was a decline in value (from 25 to 30 wt%). Inclusion of 8 wt% PCS impart a rise in flexural strength up to 10 wt% BF after which there was a progressive reduction in strength. The reason for this is on account of the agglomeration of filler particles (PCS), hence serving as a point of stress concentration. Authors70 assigned this event to poor stress transfer within interfaces. The highest flexural strength was 60 MPa at BF/PCS fraction of 30/3 wt%; a rise of 61% relative to proportion of 0/0 wt% additive. Highest value for flexural strength on addition of 4, 6, and 8 wt% PCS are 52.8, 44.5, and 38.6 MPa. This discloses a reduction in flexural strength with higher PCS proportion based on particulate agglomeration and fiber entanglement.
Figure 3.
Influence of bamboo fiber fraction on flexural strength and modulus of rupture for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% fiber loading.
Modulus of rupture
Modulus of rupture (MOR) similarly followed the same pattern as unfolded in Fig. 3. MOR improved on the integration of 2 wt% PCS and fiber proportion 5–30 wt%. Enhancement in rigidity is attributable to enhanced interfacial bonding between fiber/particulate and matrix. Blending of 6 wt% of matrix showed enhancement in rigidity from 5 to 20 wt% BF; result which corroborates the observations made in71,72. Similar experience occurred when 6 wt% PCS in FM rose from 5 to 20 wt%, although at reducing value when compared with the value obtained under 4 wt%. Studies of73–75 affirm the result obtained. Utilization of bamboo fiber in76 presented an uptrend in modulus of rupture of epoxy-bamboo fiber composites up to 30 wt% BF affirming the usefulness of bamboo fiber in improving flexural rigidity. Reduction in rupture modulus from 25 to 30 wt% BF (2, 4, and 6 wt% PCS) and 15–30 wt% BF (12 wt% PCS) is linked to entanglement with the matrix58. The highest value was recorded on the blending of 30 wt% BF/3 wt% PCS value of 4.71 (0/0 wt% additive) by 53%.
Density and water retention capacity
Relative density
The density of BF/BCF–PVC composite varied with additive proportion (Fig. 4). Average density of the sample containing 0/0 additive is 1.37, meanwhile this value reduced on the inclusion of 2, 4, 6, and 8 wt% PCS and 5 wt% fiber. It was observed that with increasing proportion of PCS, the density reduced owing to the light weight of particulate coconut shell. The results by Ref.77 show a lowering of density as the coconut shell powder filler increased, further corroborating in this study. In this study, the density of the composite depreciated with increasing fiber loading from 10 to 30 wt% BF. Incorporation of bamboo fiber and coconut shell powder resulted in lowering of densities. Lowering of density of BP/PCS PVC composite is beneficial in that the laptop must be light weight for easier carriage and portability. Diminishing values in density can be associated with lower density of fiber compared to the polymer.
Figure 4.
Influence of bamboo fiber fraction on relative density and water retention for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% fiber loading.
Water retention
Water absorption results for samples reinforced with BF/PCS of varied proportion are as illustrated in Fig. 4. Water retention (%) trended upward with PCS proportion owing to the hydrophilic nature of the particulate78. Authors79 confirmed this result as par coconut shell powder addition. Water retention rose as PCS increased on the introduction of PCS from 2 to 6 wt% intermixed with BF from 5 to 30 wt%. A distinct finding made was that the incorporation of 8 wt% gave a steady increase when blended with 5 and 10% BF. Further blending of 15–20 wt% BF, there was an exponential rise in water retention accruing to the fact that PCS and BF fiber, which are hydrophilic, are occupying more volume resulting in higher water retention. Moreover, at that proportion, water penetration weakens the bond between fiber and matrix causing fiber detachment, hence leading to more water suction. Author80, studied the effect of coconut shell powder on the properties of polyurethane and he observed an increase in water absorption of the matrix with further addition of the biofiller. Just as obtained in81,82, water retention increased with BF addition. Further corroboration to this work is expressed in83–85.
Impact strength and compressive strength
Impact strength
Impact strength of the composites developed with respect to bamboo fiber/particulate coconut shell additive as presented in Fig. 5 was observed to rise with fiber loading from 5 to 30 wt% for samples knitted with 2 wt% PCS. Intermix of 5–15 wt% BF and 4 wt% PCS also enhanced the impact strength. Enhanced interfacial adhesion and even distribution of fillers within a matrix reducing interparticle distance provoke even stress distribution within the matrix thereby effectuating higher impact strength86. However, intermix of 20–30 wt% fiber and 2/4/6 wt% PCS resulted in depreciation in impact strength and this is ascribed to fiber agglomeration which serves as portion of stress concentration; thereby instigating brittleness within matrix. Interface at 6/8 wt% PCS at fiber loading of 5 and 10 wt% improved the impact strength and this can be credited to even stress distribution and enhanced interaction between fibers and particles under stress. However, at 6 and 8 wt% the the tendency for particle agglomeration increased, a consequence of which resulted in the lowering of strength at fiber loading 15–30 wt%. Observations made in this study can be linked to the study of87 in which the impact strength reduced with fiber loading up to 30 wt%. Similarly, wood fiber incorporated into polypropylene was reported to reduce the impact strength at increased fiber loading up to 40 wt%88.
Figure 5.
Influence of bamboo fiber fraction on Izod impact strength and compressive strength for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% fiber loading.
The test was carried out on cylindrical samples of composites 40 mm in diameter and 80 mm in length and carried out as per ASTM D 69553. From Fig. 5, the compressive strength appreciated significantly with PCS loading from 2 to 8 wt% for all proportion of fiber content. Further observation is the marginal rise in compressive strength with fiber loading when considering the effect of the fiber on the strength under 2, 4, and 8% PCS. It can be inferred that particulate has a significant effect on the composites while BF has marginal effect on the compressive strength of the composite. Compressive strength was observed to peak at 55.2 MPa, an increase of 72.5% rise (relative to compressive strength of control 0 wt% PCS/BF) associated with the even distribution of PCS particles within the matrix. Compressive strength was detected to reduce at 8 wt% PCS loading. Agglomeration of particles is responsible for this, hence, during loading, residual stress were stored, amounting to lower strength against compressive stress. Observation depicted in89 corroborates the findings noted in this study as compressive strength reduced at 8 wt% fiber loading.
Hardness and wear
Hardness
Hardness was observed to increase with particulate and fiber bonding (Fig. 6). Enhanced interfacial adhesion promotes hardness which may be due to the strong adhesion of alkaline treated BF to PVC matrix. Additionally, PCS presence serves as a filler reducing the interparticle distance, repercussion of which amounted to improved hardness. Maximum hardness was attained at intermix at 30 wt% BF and 8 wt% PCS, a rise of 61%. Results obtained by Ref.90 revealed a progressive rise in hardness from 0 to 20% fiber used even as confirmed in this study.
Figure 6.
Influence of bamboo fiber fraction on hardness and wear loss index for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% fiber loading.
The hardness depicted in this study conforms to the findings of91 where shore hardness was reported to increase with rising glass fiber/titania particles intermix. Authors78 also affirmed the increased Rockwell hardness of polymer matrix reinforced with coconut shell powder.
Wear
Wear resistance of the composite was evaluated by measuring weight loss during test. Lower weight loss depicts higher abrasion resistance (Fig. 6). Similar to the study of92 who studied the wear behaviour of polyvinyl pyrrolidone composite incorporated with date palm leave fiber. It was observed in the study that weight loss reduced with fiber loading irrespective of the load applied during test. Similar result was reported by Ref.93 the wear rate reduced as the percentage carbonized bone increased.
Increase in abrasion resistance with fiber and particulate loading is traceable to the enhanced cohesion within particles of the composites enabled by the fusion of coconut shell particles in the matrix. Fiber inclusions may also promotes abrasion resistance due to strong attachment to the matrix. The study of94 depicted a reduction in wear rate by increasing coir powder and coir fiber content. Wear rate was noted to decrease with increasing coir powder loading down to 25%. As observed in this study, wear loss was more pronounced with increasing powder presence than fiber, which is associated with ease of disengagement of particles than fiber95.
Thermal and electrical conductivity
Thermal conductivity
Thermal conductivity of the composite developed increased marginally with PCS loading as presented in Fig. 7. Introduction of PCS led to a reduction of porosity promoting cohesion within particles in the matrix; thereby enhancing interparticle interaction. Thermal activation of particles amounts to excitation and gyration enabling the transfer of thermal energy from one particle to the next. Previous studies on the composite revealed an appreciation in thermal conductivity with a rise in copper particulate fraction96 and further confirmed by Ref.97.
Figure 7.
Influence of bamboo fiber fraction on thermal conductivity and electrical conductivity for 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 wt% fiber loading.
Proportional rise in BF incorporated shows a lowering of thermal conductivity despite it has been treated. Natural fibers are characterized with inherent pores and higher volume presence in matrix, introduce a slight rise in porosity, and in effect, leads to a decrease in thermal conductivity owing to the distance between particles and the possible bridges in thermal transmission. This trend was in line with study carried out by Ref.98. Previous studies of99, revealed the decrease in thermal conductivity with increasing abaca fiber due to increase void with fiber loading, an observervation further corroborated in100.
Electrical conductivity
Coconut shell powder and bamboo fiber have poor electrical conductivity101,102. Presence of PCS in increasing proportion reduced the electrical conductivity (Fig. 7). With higher fiber fraction, the electrical conductivity also depreciated103. Lower electrical conductivity shows enhanced insulation properties, hence qualifying for insulation application. Lowest conductivity was reported at 30 wt% BF and 8 wt% PCS (0.91 S/m) gives 62% enhancement reduction in thermal conductivity with respect to control. From the report, increasing the proportion of BF and PCS enhances the insulation properties.
Morphological analysis
The representative morphological features of composite samples developed are as displayed in Fig. 8.
Figure 8 presents morphological images of selected samples representing the selected mixes of images presenting microstructural features. Particulate distribution in high quantity amounts to agglomeration of particles as indicated in Fig. 8b,c, and h. These points of agglomeration serve as the stress concentration points eventually amounting to the lowering of strength as observed under compressive strength and impact strength. Figure 8d reflected the fiber observed fiber overlap within the matrix, which eventually amounts to fiber clog as seen in Fig. 8h, the consequence of which reduces strength on the dint of uneven stress distribution. Coalesce of fibers and particulates (Fig. 8a,e,f, and g) indicates even stress distribution among particulates, fibers and matrix enhancing strength. Consequence of this was reflected in the increase in tensile and flexural strength, moduli of elasticity and rupture, impact strength, and compressive strength. The closeness of these particles by dint of reduced interparticle distances allows the transfer of heat when thermally agitated, eventually causing a rise in thermal conductivity as reflected in the uptrend in thermal conductivity with increasing PCS loading. However, based on the lower conductivity of the fiber, the conductivity reduced with increasing fiber loading. Inverse position was taken as the par electrical conductivity in that increasing proportion of fibers and particulates presented depreciation in the property value based on incoherence distribution of fibers and particulates as observed in the micrographs (Fig. 8c,d, and h).
Conclusions
Treated bamboo fiber/particulate coconut shell hybrid PVC composite was examined for tensile, flexural, impact, and compressive strengths; moduli of elasticity and rupture. Other properties include hardness, wear loss index, water retention, thermal, and electrical conductivity. Results presented indicated that;
-
i.
incorporation of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 wt% bamboo fiber at 2 wt% constant particulate coconut shell resulted in enhancement of yield strength, modulus of elasticity, flexural strength and modulus of rupture, of which bamboo fiber proportion of 35 and 40 wt% resulted in strength depreciation. Similarly, particulate coconut shell addition of 4, 6, and 8 wt% instigates sdecrease in strength.
-
ii.
thermal conductivity reduced consistently with increased fiber loading but slightly increase with increased particulate loading. Electrical conductivity reduced with increased fiber and particulate loading.
-
iii.
Interfuse of 5, 10, 15 wt% fiber and 2 and 4 wt% particulate is effective in enhancing impact strength of which proportions beyond this is detrimental to impact strength of the composites. Compressive strength was better boasted with increasing fiber fraction and PCS amount but 8 wt% PCS amounted to depreciation in trend.
-
iv.
blending of the two variable inputs; 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 wt% BF and 2 wt% PCS presented better enhancement in properties of composite developed and can be utilized in development of insulating pipes and ceiling boards.
Acknowledgements
Authors appreciate Landmark University SDGs-9 Research Group (Innovation, Industry and Infrastructure) for their support.
Author contributions
A.A.A., A.A.A., and O.A.B. had the idea for the article, M.A.A.A, A.A.A, O.A.B., O.S.O., and O.S.A. performed the literature search and data analysis. A.A.A., A.A.A., O.A.B., O.S.O., O.S.A. drafted and/or critically revised the work. A.A.A., A.A.A., O.A.B., O.S.O., O.S.A. critically read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Data availability
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
Code availability
No code was used for the computation of the data reported in this study.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Fiore V, Di Bella G, Valenza A. The effect of alkaline treatment on mechanical properties of kenaf fibers and their epoxy composites. Compos. B Eng. 2015;68(2015):14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.08.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Oladele IO, Akinwekomi AD, Agbabiaka OG, Oladejo MO. Influence of biodegradation on the tensile and wear resistance properties of bio-derived CaCO3/epoxy composites. J. Polym. Res. 2019;26:1–9. doi: 10.1007/s10965-018-1676-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oladele IO, Ajileye JO, Oke SR, Daramola OO, Adewumi OA. Thermal and water absorption properties of bio-synthetic hybrid reinforced polypropylene composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.580. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pandey JK, Ahn SH, Lee CS, Mohanty A, Misra M. Recent advances in the application of natural fiber based composites. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2010;295:975–989. doi: 10.1002/mame.201000095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mochane MJ, Mokhena TC, Mokhothu TH, Mtibe A, Sadiku ER, Ray SS, Ibrahim ID, Daramola OO. Recent progress on natural fiber hybrid composites for advanced applications: a review. Express Polym. Lett. 2019;13(2):159–198. doi: 10.3144/expresspolymlett.2019.15. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Salmah H, Romisuhani A, Akmal H. Properties of low-density polyethylene/palm kernel shell composites: effect of polyethylene co-acrylic acid. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2011;26:3–15. doi: 10.1177/0892705711417028. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jurczyk S, Musoil M, Sobota M, Klim M, Hercog A, Kurcok P, Janeczek H, Rydz J. (Bio)degradable polymeric materials for sustainable future-Part 2: degradation studies of P(3HB-co-4HB)/cork composites in different environments. Polymers. 2019;11:547. doi: 10.3390/polym11030547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Balart R, Montanes N, Dominici F, Boronat T, Torres-Giner S. Environmentally friendly polymers and polymer composites. Materials. 2020;13:4892. doi: 10.3390/ma13214892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Oladele IO, Adediran AA, Akinwekomi AD, Adegun MH, Olumakinde OO, Daramola OO. Development of ecofriendly snail shell particulate-reinforced recycled waste plastic composites for automobile application. Sci. World J. 2020;2020:8. doi: 10.1155/2020/7462758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ming PTS, Bao CA, Kamarudin S, Ying CS. The potencial of oil palm ash and eggshell powder as hybrid biofillers in natural rubber biocomposites. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2020;859:012013. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/1/012013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Das M, Chakraborty D. Evaluation of improvement of physical and mechanical properties of bamboo fibers due to alkali treatment. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008;107:522–527. doi: 10.1002/app.26155. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Jawaid M, Abdul Khalil HPS, Hassan A, Dungani R, Hadiyane A. Effect of jute fibre loading on tensile and dynamic mechanical properties of oil palm epoxy composites. Compos. B Eng. 2013;45:619–624. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abdul Khalil HPS, Nur Firdaus MY, Jawaid M, Anis M, Ridzuan R, Mohamed A, A. R. Development and material properties of new hybrid medium density fibreboard from empty fruit bunch and rubberwood. Mater. Des. 2010;31(9):4229–4236. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.04.014. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alomayri T, Vickers L, Shaikh FUA, Low IM. Mechanical properties of cotton fabric reinforced geopolymer composites at 200–1000 °C. J. Adv. Ceram. 2014;3:184–193. doi: 10.1007/s40145-014-0109-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Li Z, Zhou X, Pei C. Effect of sisal fiber surface treatment on properties of sisal fiber reinforced polylactide composites. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2011;2011:1–7. doi: 10.1155/2011/803428. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Manikandan A, Rajkumar R. Evaluation of mechanical properties of synthetic fiber reinforced polymer composites by mixture design analysis. Polym. Polym. Compos. 2016;24(7):455–462. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Santos MJN, Delgado JMPQ, Barbosa de Lima AG. Synthetic fiber-reinforced polymer composite manufactured by resin transfer moulding technique: foundation and engineering applications. Diffus. Found. 2017;14:21–42. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/DF.14.21. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rohit K, Dixit S. A review—future aspect of natural fiber reinforced composite. Polym. Renew. Resour. 2016;7(2):43–60. doi: 10.1177/204124791600700202. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ahmad F, Choi HS, Park MK. A review: natural fiber composites selection in view of mechanical, light weight, and economic properties. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2014 doi: 10.1002/mame.201400089. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Azam A, Hkubab S, Yasir N, Madeba J, Tanveer H, Jiri M, Vijay B. Hydrophobic treatment of natural fibers and their composites-a review. J. Ind. Test. 2016;47(8):1–46. doi: 10.1177/1528083716654468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mohanty AK, Misra M, Drzal LT. Surface modification of natural fibers and performance of the resulting biocomposites: an overview. Compos. Interfaces. 2001;8(5):313–343. doi: 10.1163/156855401753255422. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mohammed L, Ansari MNM, Pua G, Jawaid M, Saiful Islam M. A review on natural fiber reinforced polymer composite and its applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015;2015:1–15. doi: 10.1155/2015/243947. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Faruk O, Bledzki AK, Fink H-P, Sain M. Biocomposites reinforced with natural fibers: 2000–2010. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2012;37(11):1552–1596. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Venkateshwaran N, Elaya Perumal A, Arunsundaranayagam D. Fiber surface treatment and its effect on mechanical and visco-elastic behaviour of banana/epoxy composite. Mater. Des. 2013;47:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cai M, Takagi H, Nakagaito AN, Li Y, Waterhouse GI. Effect of alkali treatment on interfacial bonding in abaca fiber-reinforced composites. Compos. Part A. 2016;90:589–597. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.08.025. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Kalia S, Kaushik VK, Sharma RK. Effect of benzoylation and graft copolymerization on morphology, thermal stability, and crystallinity of sisal fibers. J. Nat. Fibers. 2011;8(1):27–38. doi: 10.1080/15440478.2011.551002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kalia S, Kaith BS, Kaur I. Pretreatments of natural fibres and their application as reinforcing material in polymer composites—a review. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2009;49:1253–1272. doi: 10.1002/pen.21328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Xie Y, Hill CAS, Xiao Z, Militz H, Mai C. Silane coupling agents used for natural fiber/polymer composites: a review. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2010;41(7):806–819. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.03.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Suardana NPG, Ku MS, Lim JK. Effects of diammonium phosphate on the flammability and mechanical properties of bio-composites. Mater. Des. 2011;32(4):1990–1999. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2010.11.069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Suoware TO, Edelugo SO. Fabrication of oil palm fibre polymer composite panel: impact of hybridized flame retardant formulations on thermo-mechanical properties. J. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018;7:1000472. doi: 10.4172/2169-0022.1000472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Daramola O, Akinwekomi A, Adediran A, Akindote-White O, Sadiku R. Mechanical performance and water uptake behaviour of treated bamboo fibre-reinforced high-density polyethylene composites. Heliyon. 2019;5(7):e02028. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang K, Wang F, Liang W, Wang Z, Duan Z, Yang B. Thermal and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Polymers. 2018;10(6):608. doi: 10.3390/polym10060608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yang F, Long H, Xie B, Zhou W, Luo Y, Zhang C, Dong X. Mechanical and biodegradation properties of bamboo fiber-reinforced starch biodegradable composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2019;137(20):48694. doi: 10.1002/app.48694. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chattopadhyay SK, Khandal RK, Uppalari R, Ghosal AK. Bamboo reinforced polypropylene composites and their mechanical, thermal and morphological properties. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2011;119(3):1619–1626. doi: 10.1002/app.32826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Abdul Khalil HPS, Bhat IUH, Jawaid M, Zaidon A, Hermawan D, Hadi YS. Bamboo fiber reinforced biocomposites: a review. Mater. Des. 2012;42:353–368. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2012.06.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu H, Wu Q, Han G, Yao F, Kojima Y, Suzuki S. Compactibilizing and toughening bamboo flour-filled HDPE composites: mechanical properties and morphologies. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. 2008;39:1891–1900. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.09.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Oladele IO, Makinde-Isola BA, Adediran AA, Oladejo MO, Owa AF, Olayanju TMA. Mechanical and wear behaviour of pulverised poultry eggshell/sisal fiber hybrid reinforced epoxy composites. Mater. Res. Express. 2020;7:1–12. doi: 10.1088/2053-1591/ab8585. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Oladele I, Oghie II, Adediran A, Akinwekomi A, Adetula Y, Tajudden O. Modified palm kernel shell fiber/particulate cassava peel hybrid reinforced epoxy composites. Results Mater. 2019;5:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.rinma.2019.100053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Oladele IO, Oladejo MO, Adediran AA, Makinde-Isola BA, Owa AF, Akinlabi ET. Influence of designated properties on the characteristics of dombeya buettneri fiber/graphite hybrid reinforced polypropylene composites. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:11105. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-68033-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Mohan K, Abhishek B, Prithviraj M, Raghavendra A, Vinay P. Study on the effect of varying volume fraction on mechanical properties of coconut shell powder reinforced epoxy composite. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2018;376:012097. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/376/1/012097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Salmah H, Marliza M, Teh PL. Treated coconut shell reinforced unsaturated polyester composite. Int. J. Eng. Technol. 2013;13(02):94–103. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hemath R, Sekar M, Suresha B. Effects of fibers and fillers on mechanical properties of thermoplastic composites. Indian J. Adv. Chem. Sci. 2014;2:28–35. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Eng CC, Ibrahim NA, Zainuddin N, Ariffin H, Yunus WZW. Impact strength and flexural properties enhancement of methacrylate silicate treated oil palm mesocarp fiber reinforced biodegradable hybrid composites. Sci. World J. 2014;2014:8. doi: 10.1155/2014/213180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Adeosun SO, Gbenebor OP, Udeme FA. Influence of organic fillers on physiochemical and mechanical properties of unsaturated polyester composites. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 2016;41:4153–4159. doi: 10.1007/s13369-016-2120-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lu T, Liu S, Jiang M, Xu X, Wang Y, Wang Z, Gou J, Hui D, Zhou Z. Effects of modification of bamboo cellulose fibers on the improved mechanical properties of cellulose reinforced poly(lactic acid) composites. Compos. Part B. 2014;62:191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.02.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhang K, Wang F, Liang W, Wang Z, Duan Z, Yang B. Thermal and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Polymers. 2018;10:608. doi: 10.3390/polym10060608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.ASTM D6913/D6913M-17 . Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Distribution (Gradation0 of Soils Using Sieve Analysis. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 48.ASTM D3039/D3039M-17 . Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 49.ASTM D 638-14 . Standard Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: International; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 50.ASTM D790-17 . Standard Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2017. [Google Scholar]
- 51.ASTM D5229M-12 . Standard Test Method for Moisture Absorption Properties and Equilibrium Conditioning of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 52.ASTM D256-10 . Standard Test Methods for Determining the Izod Pendulum Impact Resistance of Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2018. [Google Scholar]
- 53.ASTM D 695-15 . Standard Test Method Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 54.ASTM D 785-08 . Standard Test Method Rockwell Hardness of Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 55.ASTM D1044-13 . Standard Test Method for Resistance of Transparent Plastics to Surface Abrasion. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2013. [Google Scholar]
- 56.ASTM E1530-19 . Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Resistance to Thermal Transmission by the Guarded Heat Flow Meter Technique. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2019. [Google Scholar]
- 57.ASTM D 257-14 . Standard Test Method for DC Resistance or Conductance of Insulating Materials. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International; 2014. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Daramola OO, Taiwo AS, Oladele IO, Olajide JL, Adeleke SA, Adewuyi BO. Mechanical properties of high density polyethylene matrix composites reinforced with chitosan particles. Mater. Today Proc. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.03.695. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Bertinez AN, Monzon M, Angulo IM, Ortega Z. Treatment of banana fiber for use in the reinforcement of polymeric matrices. Measurement. 2013;46(3):1065–1073. doi: 10.1016/j.measurement.2012.11.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Garcia M, Marchese J, Ochoa NA. Effect of the particle size and particle agglomeration on composite membrane performance. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2010;118(4):2417–2424. doi: 10.1002/app.32274. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Haque M, Islam N, Huque M, Hasan M, Islam S, Islam S. Coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites: physical and mechanical properties. Adv. Compos. Mater. 2010;19:91–106. doi: 10.1163/092430409X12530067339325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Haque MM, Hasan M, Islam MS, Ali ME. Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated palm and coir fiber reinforced polypropylene composites. Bioresour. Technol. 2009;100:4903–4906. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Haque MM, Islam MN. A study on the mechanical properties of urea treated coir reinforced polypropylene composites. J. Thermoplast. Compos. Mater. 2011;26(2):139–155. doi: 10.1177/0892705711419698. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Mir SS, Nafsin N, Hasan M, Hasan N, Hassan A. Improvement of physico-mechanical properties of coir-polypropylene biocomposites by fiber chemical treatment. Mater. Des. 2013;52:251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.05.062. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Oladele IO, Ibrahim IO, Adediran AA, Akinwekomi AD, Adetula YV, Olayanju TMA. Modified palm kernel shell fiber/particulate cassava peel hybrid reinforced epoxy composites. Results Mater. 2020;5:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.rinma.2019.100053. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Szabo L, Milotskyi R, Fujie T, Tsukegi T, Wada N, Ninomiya K, Takahashi K. Short carbon fiber reinforced polymers: utilizing lignin to engineer potentially sustainable resource-based biocomposites. Front. Chem. 2019;7:757. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2019.00757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Seth SA, Aji IS, Tokan A. Effects of particle size and loading on tensile and flexural properties of polypropylene reinforced doum palm shell particles composites. Am. Sci. Res. J. Eng. Technol. Sci. 2018;44(1):231–239. [Google Scholar]
- 68.Onuegbu GC, Igwe IO. Studies on properties of egg shell and fish bone powder filled polypropylene. Am. J. Polym. Sci. 2012;2(4):56–61. doi: 10.5923/j.ajps.20120204.02. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Bhasker J, Singh VK. Physical and mechanical properties of coconut shell particles reinforcement-epoxy composite. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2012;4(2):227–232. [Google Scholar]
- 70.Daramola OO, Olajide JL, Oladele IO, Adediran AA, Adewuyi BO, Muhammed AA, Sadiku ER. Mechanical and wear behaviour of polylactic acid matrix composites reinforced with crab-shell synthesized chitosan microparticles. Mater. Today Proc. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.599. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Hitoshi T, Ichihara Y. Effect of fiber length on mechanical properties of “green” composites using a starch-based resin and short bamboo fibers. JSME Int. J. Ser. A. 2004 doi: 10.1299/jsmea.47.551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Sushanta KS, Mohanty S, Nayak SK. Banana/glass fiber-reinforced polypropylene hybrid composites: fabrication and performance evaluation. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2009;48:397–414. doi: 10.1080/03602550902725407. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Siddika S, Mansura F, Hasan M, Hassan A. Effect of reinforcement and chemical treatment of fiber on the properties of jute-coir fiber reinforced hybrid polypropylene composites. Fibers Polym. 2014;15(5):1023–1028. doi: 10.1007/s12221-014-1023-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Islam MN, Rahman MR, Haque MM, Huque MM. Physico-mechanical properties of chemically treated coir reinforced polypropylene composites. Compos. Part A. 2010;41:192–198. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2009.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Saw SK, Sarkhel G, Choudhury A. Preparation and characterization of chemically modified jute–coir hybrid fiber reinforced epoxy novolac composites. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2012;125:3038–3049. doi: 10.1002/app.36610. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Zhang K, Wang F, Liang W, Wang Z, Duan Z, Yang B. Thermal and mechanical properties of bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Polymers. 2018;10(608):1–18. doi: 10.3390/polym10060608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Obiukwu OO, Uchechukwu MN, Nwaogwugwu MC. Study on the properties of coconut shell powder reinforced high density polyethylene composite. Futo J. Ser. 2016;2(2):43–55. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Talabi S, Agunsoye JO, Sanni OS. Study of mechanical behaviour of coconut shell reinforced polymer matrix composites. J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng. 2012;11:774–779. doi: 10.4236/jmmce.2012.118066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bhaskar J, Singh VK. Water absorption and compressive strength of properties of coconut shell particle reinforced-epoxy composite. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2012;4(1):113–118. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sallal HA. Effect of the addition of coconut shell powder on properties of polyurethane matrix composite. Al-Nahrain Univ. Coll. Eng. J. 2014;17(2):203–210. [Google Scholar]
- 81.Munoz E, Garcia-Manrique JA. Water absorption behaviour and its effect on the mechanical properties of flax fiber reinforced bioexpoxy composite. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2015;2015:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2015/390275. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Kalirasu S, Rajimi N, Rajesh S, Jerry-Michla JR. Water absorption behaviour on natural/synthetic fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol. 2019;9(154):1–5. [Google Scholar]
- 83.Zakaria MN, Jamaludden MA, Kassim MA, Othman NS, Othman M, Mohd Nasir SH, Mohamad Taib NA. The effect of alkaline treatment on water absorption and tensile properties of non-woven kenaf polyester composite. Adv. Mater. Res. 2013;812:258–262. doi: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.812.258. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Ramadevi PR, Dhanalakshimi S, Srinivasa CV, Basavaraju BD. Effect of alkaline treatment on water absorption of single cellulosic abaca fiber. BioResources. 2012;7(3):3515–3524. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Isa MT, Usman S, Ameh AO, Ajayi OA, Omorogbe O, Ameuru SU. The effect of fiber treatment on the mechanical and water absorption properties of short okro/glass fibers hybridized epoxy composites. Int. J. Mater. Eng. 2014;4(5):180–184. doi: 10.5923/j.ijme.20140405.03. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Jesson D, Watts J. The interface and interphase in polymer matrix composites: effect on mechanical properties and methods for identification. Polym. Rev. 2012;52(8):1–40. doi: 10.1080/15583724.2012.710288. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Eng CC, Ibrahim NA, Zainuddin N, Ariffin H, Yunus WZW. Impact strength and flexural properties enhnacement of methacrylate silane treated oil palm mesocarp fiber reinforced biodegradable hybrid comnposites. Sci. World J. 2014;2014(213180):1–8. doi: 10.1155/2014/213180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Nourbakhsh A, Kokta B, Ashori A, Jahan-Latibari A. Effect of a novel coupling agent, polybutadiene isocyanatecion: mechanical properties of wood-fiber polypropylene composite. J. Reinforced Plast. Compos. 2008;27(16–17):1679–1687. doi: 10.1177/0731684407087377. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dash, M. A Study on Thermal Characteristics of Epoxy Composites Filled with Natural Fiber and Particulate. MTech. Dissertation. National Institute of Technology, India (2016)
- 90.Durowaye SI, Lawal GI, Akande MA, Durowaye VO. Mechanical properties of particulate coconut shell and palm fruit polester composites. Int. J. Mater. Eng. 2014;4(4):141–147. doi: 10.5923/j.ijme.20140404.04. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Marhoon II. Mechanical properties of composite materials reinforced with short random glass fibers and ceramic particles. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Research. 2018;7(8):50–53. [Google Scholar]
- 92.Mohanty JR, Das SN, Das HC. Effect of fiber content on abrasive wear behaviour of date palm leaf reinforced polyvinyl pyrrolidone composite. ISRN Tribol. 2014;2014:1–10. doi: 10.1155/2014/453924. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Asuka F, Abdulwaheb M, Aigbodion VS, Fayomi OSI, Aponbiede O. Effect of load on the wear behaviour of polypropylene/carbonized bone ash particulate composite. Egypt. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2014;1(1):67–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejbas.2014.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Ibrahem RA. Friction and wear behavior of fiber/particulate reinforced polyester composites. Int. J. Adv. Mater. Res. 2016;2(2):22–26. [Google Scholar]
- 95.Wu L, Guo X, Zhang J. Abrasive reissitant coatings-a review. Lubricants. 2014;2:66–89. doi: 10.3390/lubricants2020066. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Tekce HS, Kumulutas D, Tavman IH. Effect of particle shape on thermal conductivity of copper reinforcement polymer composites. J. Reinforced Plast. Compos. 2007;26(1):113–121. doi: 10.1177/0731684407072522. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Alam MK, Islam MT, Mina MF, Gafur MA. Structural mechanical thermal and electrical properties of carbon black reinforced polyester resin. Compos. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014;131(13):40421. doi: 10.1002/app.40421. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Sahu Y. K. Study on the Effective Thermal Conductivity of Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites. MTech. Dissertation. National Institute of Technology, Rourkella, India (2014).
- 99.Liu K, Zhang X, Tagaki H, Yang Z, Wang D. Effect of chemical treatment on transverse thermal conductivity of unidirectional abaca fiber/epoxy composite. Compos. Part A. 2014;66:227–236. doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.07.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Rasheed AK, Rasheed NK, Marhoon II. Effects on the mechanical and physical properties of epoxy-polyurethane resin blend polymer. Eur. J. Eng. Res. Sci. 2018;3(8):1–4. doi: 10.24018/ejers.2018.3.8.836. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Mochidzuki K, Soutric F, Tadokoro K, Antal MJ, Toth M, Zelei B, Varhegyi G. Electrical and physical properties of carbonized charcoals. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003;42(21):5140–5151. doi: 10.1021/ie030358e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Naik J, Mishra S. Studies on electrical properties of natural fiber: hdpe composites. Polym. Plast. Technol. Eng. 2005;44:687–693. doi: 10.1081/PTE-200057818. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Haseena AP, Unnikrishman G, Kalaprasad G. Dielectric properties of short sisal/coir hybrid fiber reinforced natural rubber composites. Compos. Interfaces. 2007;14(7–9):763–786. doi: 10.1161/156855407782106582. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.
No code was used for the computation of the data reported in this study.







