Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2021 Mar 9;11:5454. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84585-z

Field evaluation of PGP Bacillus sp. strain D5 native to Crocus sativus, in traditional and non traditional areas, and mining of PGP genes from its genome

Shanu Magotra 1,5,#, Nancy Bhagat 1,#, Sheetal Ambardar 2, Tahir Ali 1, Barbara Reinhold Hurek 3, Thomas Hurek 3, Praveen Kumar Verma 4,, Jyoti Vakhlu 1,
PMCID: PMC7943801  PMID: 33750799

Abstract

Native Bacillus sp. strain D5 coded as (Bar D5) has been isolated from the saffron corm that showed plant growth promotion (PGP) properties and also inhibits the growth of corm rot causing Fusarium oxysporum R1 (Fox R1) in-vitro. Bar D5 was more efficient PGP bacterium in comparison to earlier reported native bio-formulations by our group. Pot assays and field evaluation of Bar D5 confirmed its in-vivo efficacy for PGP traits and biocontrol activity as well. Pot trials were followed by field trials at traditional (Kishtwar) and non-traditional (R.S Pura) saffron cultivation areas in Jammu and Kashmir. At both places, Bar D5 bio-formulation treatment led to the increase in root number & length, shoot number & length, flower number and number & weight of daughter corms. Additionally, it also decreased the corm rot disease incidence significantly. Priming of corms with bio-formulation resulted in the reduction of pathogenic fungal load by three fold at the depth of corm sowing from ground level. The shelf life/viability of Bar D5 based bio-formulation was found to be 52% (viable spores) for one year at room temperature. Draft genome sequence of Bar D5 revealed the presence of genes necessary for PGP and biocontrol activity. Further, confirmation of gene sequences and annotation was done by amplification, re-sequencing and mapping of PGP and biocontrol genes on draft genome. Bar D5 based bio-formulation can be provided to companies/researchers interested in saffron cultivation or bio-formulation production for commercial exploitation, since saffron is grown as revenue crop across continents. The present study bridges the gap between genomics and its field application.

Subject terms: Biotechnology, Microbiology, Molecular biology

Introduction

Crocus sativus, native to Mediterranean and Western Asia, is cultivated for its highly valuable stigma. This costliest spice in the world is produced majorly in Iran, Spain, Morocco and India1. Due to its medicinal, cosmetic, culinary uses, laborious collection and cultivation process, one pound of dried stigma costs around 70 K INR2. It is a perennial herb with male sterile flowers and propagates asexually via modified underground stem, corm. Corm quality, size and density have a significant effect on the number of daughter corms, flower production and on overall yield36. Saffron cultivation in the state of Jammu and Kashmir in India is on decline. According to a survey conducted by the Jammu and Kashmir state agriculture department, there has been a major decline in saffron yield from 15 tons in 1997 to 9 tons in 20157. Among various biotic factors, corm rot caused by Fusarium oxysporum is the most devastating810.

To increase the yield and to control the diseases, farmers are using chemical fungicides and fertilizers. The noxious these chemicals have on the environment as well as on humans are well established11,12. Excessive use of these chemicals also affects soil health and the profitable microflora, thereby putting selection pressure resulting in the evolution of resistant pathotypes13.

Plant associated bacteria have been found to be effective biological control agents, plant growth promoters and also find their importance in the suppressive soil phenomenon1416. The use of specific microbes for the suppression of diseases and promotion of plant growth can potentially provide an alternative to chemical fertilizers & fungicides. Pseudomonas and Bacillus are amongst the most popular biocontrol agents used for the preparation of bio-formulations and have been extensively used commercially in agriculture1719. Genus Bacillus is regarded as one of the classical genera for the biological control of plant diseases. The heat and desiccation-resistant spores make it more potent biological control agents. The ease of stable formulation, GRAS (generally regarded as safe) status by the US food and drug administration are additional properties that make Bacillus most used plant growth promoting microbe20,21. A number of species of Bacillus such as B. pumilus, B. amyloliquefaciens, B. cereus, B. subtilis, B. licheniformis, B. megaterium, B. mycoides and B. Velezensis have been commercialized as bio-formulation2225.

Bacterial associations with saffron cormosphere have been explored and reported earlier by our group by cultivation dependent26 and cultivation independent metagenomics approach27. In our initial studies, all bacteria were evaluated for plant growth promoting properties but thereafter the emphasis was put on Bacillus (for above mentioned reasons) from fields, roots and corm of saffron8,28. Out of various PGPB isolated, characterized and reported by our group earlier, Bacillus sp. strain D5 (Bar D5) has been now found to be the most promising PGPB, as it inhibits the growth of corm rot causing fungus Fusarum oxysporum R1 and promotes the growth & yield of saffron (in pots as well as in the fields). In the present study, we report field evaluation of Bar D5 as biocontrol-biofertilizer in traditional and non-traditional saffron cultivation areas. In addition, genome of Bar D5 was sequenced, annotated and the genes responsible for PGP activities, antifungal activity, and plant association were identified in draft genome of Bar D5. The technology for this bio-formulation is ready for commercialization.

Materials and methods

Sample collection

Corm samples were collected from saffron fields during three different stages of Crocus sativus life cycle i.e. vegetative stage (Mar–Apr), dormant stage (Jul–Aug) and flowering stage (Oct–Nov) in 2015 from Kishtwar district (33° 19′ 12.00ʺ N latitude and 75° 46′ 12.00ʺ E longitude) in Jammu and Kashmir, India. The sample collection was done as per the protocol standardized by Luster and co-workers29. The samples were collected in triplicate and stored at 4 °C.

Media and growth conditions for Fusarium oxysporum strain R1

Previously isolated and characterised Fusarium oxysporum R1 (Genbank accession number KF663598) was used in this study8. The fungus was maintained on Potato Dextrose Agar at 25 °C for 72 h. The spore suspension (1012 spores ml−1) was prepared as per the protocol reported by Gupta and Vakhlu8.

Bacillus species isolation

For isolation of Bacillus specifically from the cormosphere, microflora associated with corm sheath was screened. The soil adhered to corms was dusted by vigorous shaking and then the corm sheath (cormosphere) was separated from corm by peeling it off under sterile conditions. 1 gm of corm sheath was put in 10 ml normal saline and heated for 20 min at 80 °C to select Bacillus. This temperature is fatal to most of the non-spore forming bacteria. The 10–6 dilution of the suspension was spread on three media i.e. Luria–Bertani, Nutrient Agar and Minimal Media agar and incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The isolated Bacillus species were purified by streak plate method and stored in 60% glycerol at − 80 °C till further screening30.

Screening of isolated Bacillus strains for plant growth promotion (PGP) traits.

Isolated Bacillus species were evaluated in-vitro by qualitative as well as quantitative assays for various plant growth promoting and biocontrol properties. The PGP activities evaluated were indole acetic acid31, phosphate solubilization32, siderophore production33, amylase production34, protease production35 and antifungal activity against pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum R136.

Molecular characterization of Bacillus isolates

Genomic DNA of selected Bacillus strains was isolated using HiPurA bacterial genomic DNA purification kit (Himedia, India). The full length 16S ribosomal RNA gene was amplified using universal set primers, 8F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1522R (5′-AAGGAGGTGATCCANCCRCA-3′) primers8. The gene amplification was performed as per the modified protocol by Fierer and co-workers37 wherein, instead of 0.5 µM, 100 pM primer were used and PCR cycles were increased to 30 instead of 25 cycles. Initially DNA (50 ng) was denatured at 95 °C for 5 min followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 54 °C for 30 s and extension temperature was 72 °C for 1.5 min. The final extension was at 72 °C for 10 min. The amplicons were custom sequenced by SciGenom labs Pvt Ltd, Kerela, India. The nucleotide sequences obtained were assigned taxonomic affiliations, based on the closest match to the available sequences in the NCBI database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) using the EzTaxon version 2.1 (www.eztaxon.org). The molecular evolutionary and phylogenetic analysis was performed by aligning the sequences using multiple sequence alignment tools ClustalX 2.1 version followed by phylogenetic analysis by Phylip 3.69 (http://evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip.html) and MEGA X software38. The resulting sequences obtained were deposited in the GenBank nucleotide sequence database.

Whole genome sequencing and annotation of Bacillus sp. strain D5

Genomic DNA of Bar D5 was isolated as mentioned above and sequenced using Ion torrent Personal Genome Machine (PGM) with 400 bp of read length at School of Biotechnology, University of Jammu, India. The raw reads were quality assessed using FastQC software39 and low quality reads (Q < 30) and adapters were removed. Good quality reads were de-novo assembled using ABySS version 3.10.1. Assembled genome was annotated using SEED and the Rapid Annotations using Subsystem Technology (RAST) version 2.0 server40,41. Coding sequences (CDS) were identified by RAST annotation. Genes responsible for plant growth promotion such as phosphate solubilization, siderophore production, iron acquisition, chemotaxis, chitin and N-acetyl glucosamine utilization were identified in the draft genome. For comparative genome analysis of Bar D5 strain, whole genome sequences of other Bacillus species, Bacillus aryabhattai and Bacillus megaterium strains were downloaded from NCBI. Burrows-Wheeler Aligner software42 and MAUVE software 2.4.043, with progressive MAUVE algorithm were used for alignment of Bar D5 genome with reference genomes. Bacillus megaterium QMB1551 (NC_014019/CP001983), Bacillus aryabhattai B8W22 (NZ_FMZY0000000), Bacillus aryabhattai K13 (NZ_CP024035) and Bacillus megaterium DSM 319 (NC_014103/CP001982) were used as reference genomes for genome comparison.

Genes for plant growth promotion

Genes responsible for plant growth promotion and biocontrol activity such as phosphorus solublization activity (mtnX), siderophore biosynthesis activity (asbA), ACC deaminase activity (acd), Indole pyruvate decarboxylase activity (ipdC), acid phosphatase production (yutF), induction of systemic resistance (yngG) and transcriptional regulation of bacillomycin D (degU)44 were selected based on the available literature to check their presence in Bar D5. The protein sequences were obtained from UniProt database and were reverse translated using tblastn database45. The resulting nucleotide sequences were then mapped on the draft genome of Bar D5 using CLC Sequence Viewer version 8.0. After mapping the genes present on the draft genome of Bar D5, specific primers were designed using Primer-BLAST tool46. The PCR program used for the amplification was denaturation for 5 min at 95 °C followed by 32 cycles of denaturation for 1 min at 95 °C, annealing temperature from 50 °C to 55 °C for 30 s and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The resulting PCR products were sequenced at Sci genome Kerala, India.

Bacillus sp. strain D5 based bio-formulation preparation

For inoculum preparation, 1 ml of 20 h old Bar D5 culture (log phase) was inoculated in 200 ml of nutrient broth in a 500 ml erlenmeyer flask and was incubated for 48 h at 35 ± 1 °C with shaking at 180 rpm. The Bar D5 reached stationary phase after 48 h under mentioned conditions and the cell count was 108 CFU ml−1. 100 ml of Bar D5 broth (108 CFU ml−1) was mixed with calcium carbonate in the ratio of 1:2 V/W respectively. The calcium carbonate (talc) was autoclaved twice at 121 °C for 15 min to make it sterile before mixing it with Bar D5 to form slurry. The slurry was dried for 4 days at 35–37 °C and finally 1% sterile CMC (Carboxymethyl cellulose) was added to it and stored at room temperature26. To study the viability of spores in bio-formulation, CFU was calculated for 1 year after every 30 days by serial dilution method to establish field/shelf life of bio-formulation18.

In-vivo characterization of bio-formulation in pots

The effect of Bar D5 bio-formulation on growth parameters of saffron were evaluated in pot trials (with pot of 76 mm mouth diameter) as per complete randomized block design (CRBD). Sixty corms of uniform size (8 gm) were selected. A total of 30 corms were primed with Bar D5 bio-formulation (108 CFU ml−1) and 30 corms were treated with only talc and CMC to serve as control26. The corms (control as well as treated) were planted in steam-sterilized sand: soil mixture (1:1 w/w) inoculated with Fusarium oxysporum R1 spores (1012 spores ml−1, 5 × 1010 spores gm−1 of soil) in pots, so as to evaluate disease incidence28. Pots were incubated in plant growth chamber, under 16 h of light and 8 h of dark cycle at 26 ± 2 °C with 80% relative humidity for 40 days, and were irrigated after every 3 days. Sixty pots were laid, thirty for control and thirty for treatment, maintaining one corm in each pot. The data collected was statistically analyzed.

Field trials

Traditional area

The field trials were initiated in the month of September, 2016 in the Saffron growing fields of state agriculture department at Kishtwar, Jammu and Kashmir following complete randomized block design (CRBD). Rectangular raised beds of 4 feet × 6 feet with drainage channels and inter-bed distance of 3 feet on all the sides were prepared. For statistical relevance, around 648 corms were sown (324 corms as control and 324 corms Bar D5 primed). Three rectangular beds, each for control and treatment were made and approximately 108 corms (18 corms in each row) with 10 × 20 cm inter-corm and inter-row spacing were sown. The corms were sown at a depth of 13–15 cm from ground level6. Plant samples were collected during the flowering stage and vegetative stage of saffron life cycle.

Non traditional area

The field trials were laid in the month of August, 2018 at R.S Pura, (Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir), as per complete randomized block design (CRBD). Six rectangular beds, three for control and three for treated corms, of 3 feet × 4 feet in dimension were prepared and 50 corms (10 corms in each row) per bed were sown each for control and treatment with 10 × 20 cm inter-corm and inter row spacing. The corms were sown at a depth of 13–15 cm from ground level. Plant samples were collected during the flowering stage and vegetative stage of saffron life cycle.

Statistical analysis

All the in-vivo experiments were conducted with three biological replicates and one biological replicate data consisted of mean of ten technical replicates. Results have been expressed as mean ± standard deviation (SD). Data was subjected to statistical analysis by analysis of variance (ANOVA) using IBM SPSS statistics version 26.

Results

Selection of potential Bacillus species with PGP and antifungal activity

The preliminary selection of Bacillus species was based on the initial heat treatment of corm sheath in normal saline solution at 80 °C. A total of 181 Bacillus morphotypes were isolated from cormosphere of the saffron from the three growth stages. All the 181 isolates were evaluated in-vitro for various PGP activities such as phosphate solubilization, indole acetic production, siderophore production, enzymes production (amylase and protease) and the inhibition of pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum R1 (Fox R1) on solid media. 13 shortlisted isolates had multiple PGP activity, out of which only four strains inhibited Fox R1 growth substantially i.e. with zone of inhibition ranging between of 3–9 mm Fig. 1, Table 1. All the 13 strains isolated were identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity. The GenBank accession numbers of 13 strains has been listed in Table 1. Bacillus sp. with the best in-vitro PGP and antifungal activity against Fox R1 was identified as Bacillus sp. strain D5 (GenBank accession number KT228251) and was selected for further in-vivo evaluation in pots. The phylogenetic analysis of Bar D5 with other type strains of Bacillus species has been shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Functional profile of various Bacillus species isolate from cormposphere of saffron for various Plant growth promotion activities and antifungal activity against fungal pathogen Fusarium oxysporum R1 based upon this profile isolate D5 showed maximum potential to be used further in the study.

Table 1.

Quantitative analysis of plant growth promoting properties and antifungal potential of selected 13 short listed Bacillus species.

16S rRNA identification with strain GenBank accession number % similarity Siderophore activity (μg/ml) IAA (μg/ml) Phosphate solublization (μg/ml) Amylase activity (μg/ml) Protease activity (μg/ml) Antifungal activity (Zone of inhibition mm)
Bacillus thuringiensis DC1 KF702277 100 7.2 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.6 0 1.6 ± 0.7 2.2 ± 0.3 0
Bacillus megaterium DC2 KF702278 99 6.5 ± 0.3 0 0 0 2.1 ± 0.3 3.3 ± 0.5
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DC8 KF702284 100 4.4 ± 0.2 0 0 0 2 ± 0.1 0
Bacillus mycoides DC7 KF702283 99 4.2 ± 0.6 5.9 ± 0.8 0 1.7 ± 0.3 1.9 ± 0.5 0
Bacillus thuringiensis FC6 KF702291 100 4.90.5 2.9 ± 0.3 0 1.3 ± 0.5 0.9 ± 0.1 0
Bacillus megaterium VC2 KF702293 99 4.5 ± 0.5 6 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.2 1.40.5 1.1 ± 0.9 0
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens VC5 KF702296 99 3.9 ± 0.2 3.8 ± 0.3 0 1.8 ± 0.1 1.9 ± 0.3 4.1 ± 0.7
Bacillus sp. strain D5 KT228251 99 6.3 ± 0.4 5.6 ± 0.5 2.1 ± 0.4 3.3 ± 0.8 2.7 ± 0.4 8.8 ± 0.2
Paenibacillus polymxya D7 KT228252 99 0 2.3 ± 0.5 1 ± 0.2 1.8 ± 0.2 4.6 ± 0.4 3.4 ± 0.5
Bacillus subtilis FR1O KT228256 99 3.3 ± 0.7 0 0.30.1 1.5 ± 0.4 1.3 ± 0.1 0
Bacillus aryabhattai LB9 KT228263 99 5.6 ± 0.5 0 0.4 ± 0.1 0 0.9 ± 0.6 0
Bacillus aryabhattai LB17 KT228264 99 7.8 ± 0.5 0 1 ± 0.2 1.9 ± 0.5 0 0
Bacillus metagerium FR9 KT228255 99 4.2 ± 0.3 2.3 ± 0.7 0 2.1 ± 0.7 0.6 ± 0.2 0

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Evolutionary relationships of Bacillus sp. strain D5 with other known Bacillus type strains. The evolutionary tree was created using Neighbor-Joining method. The bootstrap concensus tree inferred from 1000 replicates. The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA X software.

Bacillus sp. strain D5 based bio-formulation

For in-vivo evaluation in the pots and fields, Bar D5 based bio-formulation was prepared using calcium carbonate in the ratio of 1:2. The bio-formulation was checked for viability of Bar D5 by calculating CFU up to 360 days. The 78% of Bar D5 spores were viable till 180 days and 52% were viable till one year at room temperature in the laboratory during various seasons Fig. 3.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Viability of Bacillus sp. strain D5 spores when mixed with Calcium carbonate for the assessment of shelf-life at room temperature.

Evaluation of Bar D5 in pot assays

Pot assays with Bar D5 treated corms resulted in significant increase in shoot–root length and shoot–root number. Number of roots increased to 9.8 ± 1.04 in treated corms as compared to 0.6 ± 0.04 in control, similarly number of shoots increased to 7.3 ± 0.7 in treated corms as compared to 1.5 ± 0.3 in control. The average length of roots was also higher in treated corms Treated (T) = 2.2 ± 0.56 cm as compared to control (C) = 0.4 ± 0.03 cm. Number and average weight of daughter corms in treated samples also increased significantly as compared to control (Number T = 8.8 ± 0.83, C = 1.4 ± 0.15; Average weight T = 6.0 ± 0.5 gm, C = 3.8 ± 0.25 gm). Importantly, the disease severity index was much less in treated corms as compared to control (T = 20%, C = 70%) Fig. 4, Table S1).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Effect of Bar D5 based bioformulation on saffron growth and disease control in Pot assay. Results are the average of ten replicates and experiments were performed in triplicates. Error bars represents the standard deviation. Corresponding results of ANOVA: *** represents the highly significant difference between means of control and treatment as P value (< 0.001), ** represents significant difference as P value (< 0.01).

Field evaluation of the Bacillus sp. strain D5 based bio-formulation

The biocontrol and plant growth promoting effect of Bar D5 based bio-formulation was evaluated for two consecutive years in traditional saffron cultivation area i.e. Kishtwar fields, in Jammu, India (2016 to 2018). During the flowering stage, infection was 30% in treated corms as compared to 70% in control corms. Further, the number of flowers produced by treated samples was 246 from 308 corms sown (80%) as compared to the control 123 from 308 corms (40%). The length of stigma was 3 ± 0.05 cm in T and 2.5 ± 0.04 cm in C. The average weight of corms was T = 9.1 ± 0.4 gm and C = 6.1 ± 0.36 gm. Fig. 5, Table 2.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Evaluation of Bar D5 based bioformulation in the fields during the flowering and vegetatitive stage of saffron life cycle. Results are the average of ten replicates and experiments were performed in triplicates. Error bars represents the standard deviation. Corresponding results of ANOVA: *** represents the highly significant difference between means of control and treatment as P value (< 0.001), ** represents significant difference as P value (< 0.01).

Table 2.

Field evaluation of Bar D5 based bio-formulation during the flowering and vegetative stage of saffron life cycle.

Growth parameters Traditional area ANOVA results Non traditional area ANOVA results
Control Test Fold change F1,4 value P value Control Test Fold change F1,4 value P value
Flowering stage Flower number (First year in %) 40 ± 0.50 80 ± 0.57 2 ± 0.03 7857.818 0.000 12 ± 0.57 22 ± 0.57 1.76 ± 0.07 392.000 0.000
Stigma length (cm) 2.5 ± 0.05 3 ± 0.04 1.2 ± 0.02 81.869 0.001 2.2 ± 0.05 2.6 ± 0.07 1.1 ± 0.03 40.641 0.003
Flower number (Second year in %) 47.3 ± 2.08 92 ± 1 1.9 ± 0.10 1122.250 0.000 24 ± 1.5 54 ± 1 2.3 ± 0.20 828.100 0.000
Stigma length (cm) 2.5 ± 0.02 3 ± 0.01 1.2 ± 0.02 750.893 0.000 2.3 ± 0.03 2.7 ± 0.07 1.2 ± 0.05 76.970 0.001
Weight of corm (gm) 6.1 ± 0.36 9.1 ± 0.4 1.5 ± 0.03 103.846 0.001 5.4 ± 0.05 8.6 ± 0.52 1.6 ± 0.08 103.953 0.001
Disease incidence (%) 70 ± 1.5 30 ± 0.76 2.3 ± 0.10↓ 1645.714 0.000 66 ± 1.5 35 ± 1 1.9 ± 0.10↓ 883.600 0.000
Vegetative stage Shoot length (cm) 12.5 ± 0.5 16.8 ± 0.52 1.3 ± 0.02 95.151 0.001 11.1 ± 0.76 14.2 ± 0.64 1.2 ± 0.14 28.926 0.006
Shoot number 4.3 ± 0.57 7.7 ± 0.57 1.8 ± 0.20 50.000 0.002 3.4 ± 0.4 5.9 ± 0.32 1.6 ± 0.07 66.613 0.001
Number of leaves 7.3 ± 0.57 12.5 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.15 137.286 0.000 7 ± 0.3 10.1 ± 0.36 1.4 ± 0.16 66.446 0.001
Number of daughter corms 2.4 ± 0.40 6.8 ± 0.45 2.8 ± 0.29 91.562 0.001 2 ± 0.15 4.8 ± 0.35 2.4 ± 0.30 3192.350 0.000
Weight of daughter corms (gm) 4.5 ± 0.45 8.23 ± 0.5 1.8 ± 0.17 153.223 0.000 2.9 ± 0.35 5 ± 0.25 1.7 ± 0.29 152.819 0.000
Disease incidence 66 ± 0.50 19 ± 0.57 3.4 ± 0.08↓ 10,961.286 0.000 59 ± 0.57 21 ± 1 2.8 ± 0.16↓ 3192.250 0.000

Bold values highlight the infrence between the control and test sample.

During the vegetative phase (when mother corm is consumed and gives rise to new daughter corms) results obtained suggest that there was considerable difference between the number of daughter corms produced by treated and control samples. The number and weight of daughter corms produced in treated samples were significantly enhanced as compared to control samples (Number, T = 6.8 ± 0.45 and C = 2.4 ± 0.4; Average weight, T = 8.2 ± 0.5 gm and C = 4.5 ± 0.45 gm). The disease incidence was also reduced to 19% in treated corms and to 66% in control samples. The shoot length and number were also higher in treated samples as compared to control samples (length, T = 16.8 ± 0.52 cm and C = 12.5 ± 0.50 cm; Number, T = 7.7 ± 0.57 and C = 4.3 ± 0.57). The number of leaves in treated sample was 12.5 ± 0.50 as compared to 7.3 ± 0.57 in control. The plant samples were uprooted from fields at the end of second year for comparative analysis and the treated plants were found to be healthier as compared to the control samples. The number of shoots and leaves was also higher in treated samples Fig. 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Comparison of plants samples obtained from the fields in Kishtwar in 2018. (A) Control samples and, (B) Plant samples treated with Bar D5 bio-formulation before sowing. The treated samples show better growth in terms of number and size of shoots and roots and production of daughter corms.

In order to study the effect of Bar D5 based bio-formulation on the fungal load, soil samples from various depths were compared for the presence of Fox R1 using Fusarium specific growth media. The study reveals that the soil sample at a depth of corm sowing (13–15 cm) had least number of Fusarium spores (3 × 109 CFU gm−1 of soil) around Bar D5 primed corms as compared to the control soil (9 × 109 CFU gm−1 of soil). Also, the Fusarium load was less at a depth of 13–15 cm as compared to soil at varying depth, indicating the potential role of Bar D5 in suppressing the growth of pathogenic fungus around the corms Fig. 7, Table S2).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Analysis of fungal spores of at various depths in the control and treated field soil. Results are the average of five replicates. Error bars represents the standard deviation. Corresponding results of ANOVA: *** represents the highly significant difference between means of control and treatment as P value (< 0.001), ** represents significant difference as P value (< 0.01).

Subsequently, in 2018–2019, plant growth promoting effect of Bar D5 based bio-formulation was also evaluated in fields of R.S. Pura Jammu, the non-traditional area of saffron cultivation. During the flowering stage in first year, out of 150 corms planted in each case, 33 flowers (22%) were produced in treated samples as compared to 18 flowers (12%) in control. The length of stigma was 2.6 ± 0.07 cm in treated and 2.2 ± 0.05 cm in control. Disease incidence was also less in treated samples (35%) as compared to control (66%). During vegetative stage, shoot length and number were also higher in treated plants (length T = 14.2 ± 0.64 cm and C = 11.1 ± 0.76 cm; Number T = 5.9 ± 0.3 and C = 3.4 ± 0.40). The number of leaves in treated samples was 10.1 ± 0.36 and in control was 7 ± 0.30. The total number and weight of daughter corms produced in treated samples was double as compared to the control samples (Number T = 0.4.8 ± 0.35 and C = 2 ± 0.15; Weight T = 5 ± 0.25 gm and C = 2.9 ± 0.35 gm). There was a significant difference in second year flowering percentage of saffron life cycle in non-traditional year. In treated samples, the flowering percentage was 54% (81 flowers from 150 corms planted) compared to control where it was only 24% (36 flowers from 150 corms planted) Fig. 8, Table 2.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Evaluation of Bar D5 based bio-formulation on saffron growth during flowering and vegetatitive phase of life cycle in Jammu fields (Non traditional area of saffron cultivation). Results are the average of five replicates. Error bars represents the standard deviation. Corresponding results of ANOVA: *** represents the highly significant difference between means of control and treatment as P value (< 0.001), ** represents significant difference as P value (< 0.01).

A comparison of the outcome of field trials in traditional and non-traditional area has been tabulated in Table 2.

Genome analysis of Bar D5

Whole genome sequencing of Bar D5 resulted in 250 Mb data with ~ 30 × coverage. Sequencing reads having more than Q30 phred score were used for de-novo assembly using ABySS version 3.10.1. De-novo assembly resulted in draft genome of ~ 3.9 Mb (3,959,600 bp) having 12 contigs with N50 as 3,726,54 bp and L50 as 4. The average G + C content of genome was 36.9%. Bar D5 draft genome annotation resulted in 4414 coding sequences (CDS), 65 RNAs and 349 subsystems as predicted by RAST annotation server. Various genes involved in cellular and metabolic processes of Bar D5 were annotated in the draft genome and their number has been tabulated in Table 3. All the genes responsible for plant growth promoting traits (that showed biochemical activity in plate based assay) were present in draft genome except genes for plant hormone indole acetic acid Table 3. Genes for PGP such as phosphorus metabolism (Table S3), iron acquisition (Table S4), siderophore metabolism (Table S5), for flagella biosynthesis and chemotaxis (Table S6) for chitin and N-acetyl glucosamine utilization (Table S7) were present in draft genome. In addition, genes for nitrogen metabolism, sulphur metabolism, potassium metabolism, genes for multiple drug resistance (resistance to fluoroquinnolones), heavy metal resistance (zinc, arsenic, cobalt-zinc-cadmium, cadmium), for beta lactamase enzymes, for stress response (osmotic stress, oxidative stress, cold shock, detoxification and carbon starvation), volatile compounds such as butanol biosynthesis and acetoin & butanediol metabolism, synthesis of bacteriocins and antibacterial peptides were also present Table 3. The whole-genome draft sequence has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number QGGC00000000. The version described here is QGGC01000000.

Table 3.

Genes identified in the draft genome of Bar D5 involved in cellular and metabolic processes by RAST analysis.

S. no Genes function No. of genes involved
1 Cofactors, vitamins, prosthetic groups, pigments 120
2 Cell wall and capsule 120
3 Virulence, disease and defense 74
4 Potassium metabolism 16
5 Photosynthesis 0
6 Miscellaneous 27
7 Phages, prophages, transposable elements, plasmids 0
8 Membrane transport 54
9 Iron acquisition and metabolism 29
10 RNA metabolism 123
11 Nucleosides and nucleotides 60
12 Protein Metabolism 75
13 Cell division and cell cycle 3
14 Motility and chemotaxis 109
15 Regulation and cell signaling 44
16 Secondary metabolism 5
17 DNA metabolism 66
18 Fatty acids, lipids, and isoprenoids 64
19 Nitrogen metabolism 16
20 Dormancy and sporulation 40
21 Respiration 75
22 Stress response 81
23 Metabolism of aromatic compounds 16
24 Amino acids and derivatives 329
25 Sulfur metabolism 45
26 Phosphorus metabolism 42
27 Carbohydrates 334

RAST annotation predicted the top twenty closest neighboring strains of Bacillus sp. strain D5 wherein, Bacillus megaterium QMB1551 was the closest neighboring strain (Table S8). Though, 16S rRNA gene sequencing identified the Bacillus sp. as Bacillus aryabhattai and comparative genomic analysis using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner of Bacillus sp. strain D5 draft genome resulted in 99.47% similarity with both Bacillus aryabhattai B8W22 and Bacillus aryabhattai K13 and 100% with both Bacillus megaterium QMB1551 and Bacillus megaterium DSM319. Even, comparative genome analysis of Bar D5 with other 4 references (mentioned above) using MAUVE software also found that the draft genome of Bar D5 was equally similar to both Bacillus aryabhattai and Bacillus megaterium. This was well represented by conserved regions (colored regions in Fig. 9 in Bar D5 that were also present in all the other references Fig. 9. Coloured blocks are called Locally Collinear Blocks (LCB) that aligned among them in input genomes with same colored lines represent the regions of homology and internally free from genomic rearrangement.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Comparison of genomes of Bar D5 in progressive MAUVE version 2.4.0 with Bacillus aryabhattai and Bacillus megaterium reference strains. Each genome panel contains the name of the genome sequence, a scale showing the sequence coordinates for that genome, and a single black horizontal centerline. Colored block outlines surround a region of the genome that aligned to part of another and is presumably homologous and internally free from genomic rearrangement.

Confirmation of authenticity of draft genome by amplification and mapping of genes for PGP and biological control on draft genome of Bar D5

To confirm the authenticity of draft genome sequence, the PGP genetics determinants responsible for plant growth promotion activity and defense properties of Bacillus sp. strain D5 were PCR amplified, sequenced and re-mapped on the draft genome. In addition, the gene sequence for IAA was not identified by RAST analysis on draft genome but by amplification of the IAA from genome of Bar D5. The amplicon size obtained from these genes was 267 bp (mtnX), 381 bp (asbA), 369 bp (acd), 270 bp (ipdc), 367 bp (yutF), 255 bp (yngG) and 399 bp (degU). These amplicons were then sequenced and the resulting nucleotide sequences were mapped on the draft genome using CLC Sequence Viewer version 8.0 to reconfirm the position of genes on the draft genome and the GenBank accession number of these gene sequences has been tabulated in Table 4.

Table 4.

Bar D5 genes for plant growth promotion and secondary metabolism amplified and mapped on draft genome.

S. no Target gene Primer Sequence Gene function Position on draft genome, (GenBank accession number) Product length (bp)
1 mtnX

mtnX F1 AGATTGCATGAGCTTGCGGA

mtnX R1 ACTGCACCCAGCATTCGTTA

Phosphorus solubilization 152,076–152,287 (QGGC01000011.1) 267
2 asbA

sbp F1 GCCAAGACCTTTTAGCAGCG

sbp R1 ACGTCGGCTGAGTTACGTTT

Siderophore biosynthesis 137,935–138,248 (QGGC01000006.1) 381
3 acd

acdS F1 CATGCAGGATTAGTGGCAGGC

acdS R1 TGAACCTCCTGAGTGGATAAACACC

ACC deaminase 4735–5061 (QGGC01000006.1) 369
4 ipdC

ipdC F2 GACGTCCCCACCATAATTAACAAA

ipdC R2 CAGTGACCCAGAAGATGTAGCC

Indole pyruvate decarboxylase 82,725–82,494 (QGGC01000001.1) 270
5 yutF

yutF F1 CCGACATGCGTTGCTTGAAA

yutF R1 GCCTGCATTCATCCCTGCTA

Acid phosphatase 322,241–322,552 (QGGC01000004.1) 367
6 yngG

yngG F1 AGGCGGTGGAAATGCAAGT

yngG R1 AAGATGCTTCTACTGTTGCAAATAC

Induction of systemic resistance 485,264–485,456 (QGGC01000002.1) 255
7 degU

degU F1 TGCAGAAGGTGACGACGG

degU R1 AACAAATGTAGTGGACGGCGA

Transcriptional regulation of Bacillomycin D 182,075–182,424 (QGGC01000004.1) 399

Discussion

Saffron is the costliest spice in the world but with decline in its production and increased use in medicine & cosmetics, it has become the most adulterated spice as well47,48. The reasons for the yield loss are many but corm rot caused by various microbial pathogens and climate change are two of them7,49.

Out of 181 total Bacillus strains isolated from three growth phases of saffron, Bar D5 was comparatively better PGPB. Bar D5 based bio-formulation was also found to be better than previously reported three different bio-formulations by our group on the basis of pot assay evaluation Table 5. Earlier bio-formulations were (i) bacterial consortia comprising of (Chryseobacterium elymi WRF4, Pseudomonas tremae WRF2, Acetinobacteria calcoaceticus WRF1, Bacillus aryabhattai WRF5, Pseudomonas kilonensis WRF3 and Pseudomonas koreensis WRF6A26 (ii) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W28 and (iii) bacilli consortia comprising of Bacillus thurinniensis DC1, Bacillus megaterium VC3 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DC828. Previously, reported Bacillus aryabhattai strains associated with saffron rhizosphere26 and cormosphere28 are from saffron fields in Kashmir. The one being reported in present study has been isolated from cormosphere of saffron plant grown in Kishtwar region of the state. The present strain Bar D5 is different from earlier reported Bacillus aryabhattai WRF526 and Bacillus aryabhattai VC128 as Bar WRF5 did not show phosphate solubilization activity and Bar VC1 did not show any antifungal activity.

Table 5.

Comparative table for results of pot trials with different native bio-formulations.

Growth parameters Column3mn4
Consortium 1
(Acetinobacteria calcoaceticus WRF1, Pseudomonas tremae WRF2, Pseudomonas kilonensis WRF3, Chryseobacterium elymi WRF4, Bacillus aryabhattai WRF5 and Pseudomonas koreensis WRF6A)
(Ambardar and Vakhlu5)
Column6
Consortium 2
(Bacillus thurinniensis DC1, Bacillus megaterium VC3 and Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DC8)
(Kour et al.43)
Bacillus sp. strain D5 alone (Present study) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W2 alone (Gupta and Vakhlu30)
Control Test Control Test Control Test Control Test
Number of roots 1.2 ± 0.81 3.6 ± 1.82 0.6 ± 0.3 9.4 ± 2.8 0.6 ± 0.04 9.8 ± 1.04
Length of roots (cm) 0.1 ± 0.06 1.15 ± 0.54 0.6 ± 0.3 2.6 ± 0.1 0.4 ± 0.03 2.2 ± 0.56
Number of shoots 4.3 ± 0.53 5.6 ± 0.49 1 ± 0.5 4.2 ± 0.8 1.5 ± 0.3 7.3 ± 0.7
Length of shoots (cm) 9.95 ± 3.90 6.59 ± 1.59 1.4 ± 0.6 9 ± 1.9 2.3 ± 0.25 9.7 ± 1.15
Number of daughter corms 0.5 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 1.11 1.2 ± 0.2 6.4 ± 1.4 1.4 ± 0.15 8.8 ± 0.83 ­
Disease incidence 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.2 0.7 0.2 2.8 1.2

Bacillus and Pseudomonas are used pre-dominantly as PGP and biological control agents, for both direct as well as indirect mechanism of plant growth promotion50. However, membres of Bacillus genera are preferred for bio-formulations preparation because of their long shelf/field life. Their long shelf life is due to their ability to form heat and desiccation-resistance spores, which can survive high temperatures and unsuitable pH51,52. Additionally, Bacillus also possesses several other pre-requisite PGP characteristics which includes their tendency to replicate at a faster rate, ability to colonise the roots rapidly and their competitive colonisation potential53. They promote the growth of plants by the production of various phytohormone precursors such as indole acetic acid, cytokinins, gibberellins and ethylene, conversion of complex nutrients like phosphorous and nitrogen in to simple forms, synthesis of siderophores, production of secondary metabolites and antifungal compounds54,55.

Bar D5 was characterized as plant growth promoting bacteria, as it produced siderophores, protease, indole acetic acid and solubilized phosphate that have important role in plant growth and disease control. Siderophores are low molecular weight compounds that chelate the iron compounds. Bacterial species producing these siderophores help in uptake of iron, which is a vital mineral nutrient required by the plants56. Siderophore producing bacterial isolates from cormosphere promote growth by making iron less available for the pathogenic species by iron chelation, hence act as biocontrol agents. Siderophore producing bacteria like Bacillus from the rhizosphere of Piper nigrum L. has been reported to have PGP activity on shallot bulbs and seeds of mustard57. Phosphate solubilizing bacteria helps in the uptake of phosphorous from soil and promotes plant growth55. Protease has been reported as a hydrolase which along with chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase causes fungal cell wall lysis, hence resulting in the disease control8. Bacillus aryabhattai has also been reported from Erigeron Canadensis and soybean with PGP activity58,59. Bacillus aryabhattai strain SRB02 promoted the growth of soyabean plant by modulating the production of various phytoharmones such as ABA, IAA, JA, GA12, GA4 and GA760.

In addition to PGP activities, Bar D5 also has antifungal activity against pathogenic Fusarium oxysporum R1. Bacillus species, B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens are well studied for their antagonistic activity towards Fusarium spp.61. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 is a commercially available biocontrol agent and biofertilizer62. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W2 has been reported as biological control agent against corm rot causing agent Fusarium oxysporum R1 in saffron8.

Bar D5 based bio-formulation has (52%) viable CFU up to 1 year at room temperature Fig. 3 and was evaluated in pots and fields by corms priming. Jyoti and co-workers63 have studied the viability of consortia (Providencia vermicola A2 and Klebsiella pneumoniae CP19) in talc based and bagasse based bio-formulation and was found to be stable for 70 days. Viability of endophytic Bacillus sp. CaB5 was investigated in talc based bio-formulation by plate count method & fluorescence method and was found to be stable up to 45 days64. The decline in viability with time can be due to nutrient depletion and autolysis of cells18.

Pot trails with bio-formulation resulted in significant increase in the various parameters contributing to plant growth promotion wherein root number, shoot number, number of daughter cormlets was enhanced by 17.7 folds, 4.9 folds and 6.6 folds respectively whereas corm rot disease was decreased by 3.6 folds as compared to control. Park and co-workers60 have reported B. aryabhattai SRB02 from soyabean rhizosphere where it significantly increased the root and shoot length of plant in pots by the production of various phytoharmones. Similarly, Bacillus aryabhattai strain AB211, reported from maize, also significantly increased the root/shoot length, dry and wet weight of maize seedlings in pot experiments by solubilizing inorganic phosphorus, synthesized siderophore and producing IAA65. Brahim et al.66 reported Bacillus sp. BCLRB2 with multiple PGP properties (IAA, chitinase & protease production and phosphate solubilization) that increased the maize length by 31% and fresh biomass by 43% under saline conditions in pot assays. Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0575 from banana rhizosphere increased the total dry weight (root + shoot) of banana plant by 34.60% under green house conditions67. In the present study, the increase in root-shoot length and number attributed to the production of phytoharmone IAA, phosphate solubilization and siderophore production by Bar D5 making inslouble nutrients present in soil, available to plant and increase in cormlets production could be due to starch hydrolysis and IAA production by Bacillus strain28. The starch hydrolysis in saffron corm helps the floral, vegetative buds and roots to differentiate during dormancy. The starch in saffron corms is converted into sucrose and other suitable sugars and transported to the tissues, where buds are differentiated and developed68. Similarly in maize, IAA producing Bacillus strains have been reported to improve seed germination and seedling growth57.

The field evaluation of bio-formulation further increased flower number by 2 folds, stigma length by 1.2 folds and reduced disease incidence by 2.3 folds in treated as compared to control corms. Along with disease suppression, treated plants produced more daughter corms (2.83 folds) and were healthy than the control sample during vegetative phase Fig. 6. The reduction of disease in the fields due to the competition for the niche, siderophore production, and induction of plant immune system that activates hyper-defense response upon pathogen attack (Ali et al. Un published data). Bar D5 treated corms showed significant increased in all the growth parameters in flowering and vegetative stage in non-traditional area as well. In flowering stage, bio-formulation increased the flower number by 1.7 folds, stigma length by 1.1 folds and reduced the disease incidence by 1.9 folds. The weight of corms was 1.6 folds more in treated corms compared to control. In vegetative stage also, there was significant difference in growth parameters such as shoot length (1.2 folds), shoot number (1.6 folds), number of daughter corms (2.4 folds) as well as reduction in disease incidence (2.8 folds). Similar to present study, Bacillus Xiamenensis PM14 isolated from sugarcane rhizosphere exhibited various PGP activities (phosphate solubiltion, siderophore production, IAA production catalase, protease, chitinase, pectinase, cellulose) increased the fresh weight of plant by 30%, root length by 37%, plant length by 5%, cane length by 27.5% and significantly reduced the incidence of red rot disease in green house experiments69.

Xiang and co-workers70 found that Bacillus subtilis subsp. Subtilis strains Bsssu2, BSSSu3 and B. velezensis strain Bve12 increased the soya bean plant height and biomass in the green house trials and Bacillus altitudinis stain Bal13 increased early growth of soya bean in green house and microplot trials. Also, in field trials, Bacillus safensis strain Bsa27 and (B. velezensis starin Bve2 + Bacillus altitudinis strain Bal13) reduced Heterodera glycines cyst population density at 60 DAP. PGPR Bacillus velezensis Ba168 has been reported as promising biological control agent against tobacco black shank disease caused by pathogen Phytophthora nicotianae, which reduced the disease index in field assays71. Recently, Karthika et al.72 isolated bacterium Bacillus cereus KTMA4 from tomato rhizosphere which was found to be effective against phytopathogens Fusarium oxysporum and Alternaria saloni and also, increased the plant height, fresh/wet weight in green house experiments.

In present study, the effect of the bio-formulation on the length of stigma, in addition to the increase in corm and flower number is commercially very important. Recently, Zhou et al.73 has drawn co-relation between root-shoot development and stigma quality in saffron. The hypothesis can be proposed that increase in shoot–root length and number induced by Bar D5 could be the reason for longer stigma length and higher number of corms and flowers. In depth studies are needed to be conducted to understand the underlying mechansim.

In order to mine the genes responsible for plant growth promotion and biocontrol potential, whole genome of Bacillus sp. strain D5 was sequenced using Ion torrent PGM technology and the genome was assembled de-novo, by using ABySS version 3.10. The draft genome of Bar D5 (3,959,600 bp) was found to be smaller than the closely related Bacillus megaterium QMB1551 (5,097,129 bp) and Bacillus megaterium DSM319 (5,097,447 bp) genome74. Draft genome sequence of Bar D5 revealed the presence of PGP genes in the genome, reported to be responsible for biocontrol activity and growth promotion. Presence of genes responsible for motility and chemotaxis (Table S6) indicated that Bar D5 is plant associated bacterium, as these genes are responsible for bacterial movement towards the plant roots in response to the exudates and other nutrients released by the plants75. Presence of genes for iron acquisition (Table S4), siderophore synthesis (Table S5) and antibiotic resistance usually help the strain by protecting it from antibiotics produced by other organisms and by inhibiting pathogen by iron chelation65. Presence of genes for phosphate solubilization, ammonia assimilation, sulphur metabolism, potassium metabolism revealed that the Bar D5 has plant growth promotion potential. The presence of genes for stress response (cold stress, carbon starvation) demonstrates that it can survive harsh environmental conditions as well. Bar D5 genome has all genes for the production of volatile compounds (acetoin & 2,3-butanediol). Volatile compounds produced by root associated bacteria are known to elicit induced systemic resistance in plants76. Ryu and co-workers77, for the first time reported the role of Bacillus volatile compounds in plant growth and induction of systemic resistance. Bacillus subtilis GB03 and B. amyloliquefaciens IN937a capable of promoting plant growth and induction of systemic resistance utilizing volatile compounds such as 3-hydroxy-2-butanone (acetoin) and 2,3-butanediol77. Bacillus subtilus SYST2, capable of producing volatile compounds (albuterol and 1,3-propanediole) with plant growth promotion activity has already been reported78. Volatile compounds produced by Bacillus sp. also inhibits the growth of various fungal pathogens, hence act as antifungal compounds79.

Phylogenetic analysis by 16S rRNA gene indicated that Bacillus sp. strain D5 has maximum similarity with Bacillus aryabhattai B8W22 type strain but RAST annotated draft genome showed maximum similarity with Bacillus megaterium QMB1551. In order to confirm the taxonomy at species level, genome alignment of Bar D5 was performed against four reference genome were done using Burrows-Wheeler Aligner software, which showed 100% similarity with Bacillus megaterium QMB1551 and Bacillus megaterium DSM319 whereas 99.47% similarity with Bacillus aryabhattai B8W22 and Bacillus aryabhattai K13. Comparative genome analysis using MAUVE software also depicted that the Bar D5 was equally similar to both Bacillus megaterium and Bacillus aryabhattai represented by the conserved regions common in all the species. Though , Bacillus aryabhattai and Bacillus megaterium are closely related species but no conclusion was drawn regarding species of the Bacillus under study as genome of Bar D5 is a draft genome with gaps in it Therefore, at present it was identified taxonomically only at genus level and referred as Bacillus sp. strain D5. Ray and co workers80 and Bhattacharyya and co workers65 have also reported the close homology of Bacillus megaterium with Bacillus aryabhattai suggesting common evolutionary relationship of the two species of Bacillus. Gap filling and closing the genome sequence requires re-sequencing, preferably on multiple platforms, which will be the future course of present study.

Most of the PGP genes were present in the draft genome except for genes responsible for plant growth hormone, IAA though it showed IAA activity biochemically on plate based assay. To reconfirm the presence of gene for IAA production and other PGP activities, fresh amplification of PGP genes were done from the genome of Bar D5. The selection of genes for reconfirmation was done based on the already reported bacterial plant growth promotion and antifungal genes44. The selected genes were mapped on the draft genome of Bar D5 and specific primers were designed for the amplification of Bar D5 genes Table 4. Since, all the basic genes necessary for plant growth promotion and biocontrol activity were present in Bar D5 genome, it further confirms its potential for commercial scale. An additional feature of being native to saffron plant makes it more worthy as it will not affect natural microflora associated with saffron corms. Therefore there are less chances of development of resistant pathotypes.

Conclusion

The gap in production and demand of saffron, in international market is huge. However, its yield is decreasing due to corm rot disease and climate change. Use of chemical fertilizers and antifungal agents to increase production is not sustainable for obvious reasons. Saffron is a sustainable crop, as it requires low inputs and water but is labour intensive in terms of harvesting and post harvesting processing. Traditionally, it is cultivated in Iran, Spain, India, Italy, France, Switzerland, Morocco and India but now its cultivation is extended to USA, Australia, China and Afghanistan etc. The reason is profitability on account of its application in medicine, food and cosmetics. Therefore, there is international market for alternative to chemical agents, for augmentation of saffron production, and this is going to increase. Bar D5 based bio-formulation is being proposed as one such alternative. The field data in present study has been complimented with the genomic data of the Bacillus, with PGP genes sequenced and mapped on draft genome, indicating that the PGP properties of Bar D5 are genetic and hence stable.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (217.8KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

The research was financially supported by DST-DAAD, DBT, UGC for providing fellowship, NMPB and NBAIM. Authors also want to thank the Director, State Agriculture Department, Jammu for providing the samples and fields for analysis. The help by Dr. Parmil Kumar, Department of statistics, University of Jammu with statistical analysis of data is acknowledged.

Author contributions

S.M. and N.B. designed and conducted the experiments and wrote the manuscript. S.M., N.B. and T.A. performed the field trials. S.A. and N.B. did the data analysis. B.R.H. and T.H. provided facility and guidance for CLC based genome analysis. J.V. conceptualized and supervised the study, in addition to supervision of manuscript writing. P.K.V. helped compilation and writing of manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Shanu Magotra and Nancy Bhagat.

Contributor Information

Praveen Kumar Verma, Email: pkv@nipgr.ac.in.

Jyoti Vakhlu, Email: jyotimetagenomic@gmail.com.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-021-84585-z.

References

  • 1.Cardone L, Castronuovo D, Perniola M, Cicco N, Candido V. Saffron (Crocus sativus L.), the king of spices: An overview. Sci. Hortic. 2020;272:560. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109560. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Masi E, Taiti C, Heimler D, Vignolini P, Romani A, Mancuso S. PTR-TOF-MS and HPLC analysis in the characterization of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) from Italy and Iran. Food Chem. 2016;192:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.06.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Mashayekhi K, Latifi N. Effect of corm mass on saffron flowering. Iran J. Agric. Sci. 1997;28(1):135–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Omidbeygi, R., Ramezani, A., Sadeghi, B. & Ziaratnia, S.M. Effect of corm mass on saffron production in Neyshabur climate. Proceeding of 3rd National Congress on Iranian Saffron, Mashhad, Iran (2003).
  • 5.Sadeghi, B. Effects of corm size on flower production in saffron. Annual report, Scientific and Industrial Research Organization of Khorasan, Mashhad, Iran (1996).
  • 6.Yasmin S, Nehvi F. A Saffron as a valuable spice: A comprehensive review. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 2013;8(3):234. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Menia M, Iqbal S, Zahida R, Tahir S, Kanth RH, Saad AA, Hussian A. Production technology of saffron for enhancing productivity. J. Pharmacognos. Phytochem. 2018;7(1):1033–1039. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gupta R, Vakhlu J. Native Bacillus amyloliquefaciens W2 as a potential biocontrol for Fusarium oxysporum R1 causing corm rot of Crocus sativus. Eur. J. Plant pathol. 2015;143(1):123–131. doi: 10.1007/s10658-015-0670-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gupta V, Kalha CS, Razdan VK. Etiology and management of corm rot of saffron in Kishtwar district of Jammu and Kashmir India. J. Mycol. Plant Pathol. 2011;41(3):361. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Husaini AM, Hassan B, Ghani MY, Teixeira da Silva JA, Kirmani NA. Saffron (Crocus sativus L. Kashmirianus) cultivation in Kashmir practices and problems. Funct. Plant Sci. Biotechnol. 2010;4:108–115. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Arora NK, Mehnaz S, Balestrini R, editors. Bio-Formulations: For Sustainable Agriculture. Berlin: Springer; 2016. pp. 1–283. [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hernández AF, Parrón T, Tsatsakis AM, Requena M, Alarcón R. Toxic effects of pesticide mixtures at a molecular level: Their relevance to human health. Toxicology. 2013;307:136–145. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2012.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hobbelen PH, Paveley ND, Van den Bosch F. The emergence of resistance to fungicides. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(3):e91910. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091910. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Amaresan N, Jayakumar V, Kumar K, Thajuddin N. Biocontrol and plant growth-promoting ability of plant-associated bacteria from tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) under field condition. Microb. Pathog. 2019;136:103713. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2019.103713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chaurasia A, Meena BR, Tripathi AN, Pandey KK, Rai AB, Singh B. Actinomycetes: An unexplored microorganisms for plant growth promotion and biocontrol in vegetable crops. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018;34(9):132. doi: 10.1007/s11274-018-2517-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Verma PP, Shelake RM, Das S, Sharma P, Kim JY. Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and fungi (PGPF): Potential biological control agents of diseases and pests. Int. J. Human. Soc. Sci. 2019;2:281–311. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kalita, M., Bharadwaz, M., Dey, T., Gogoi, K., Dowarah, P., Unni, B. G. & Saikia, I. Developing novel bacterial based bio-formulation having PGPR properties for enhanced production of agricultural crops (2015). [PubMed]
  • 18.Kumar V. Characterization, bio-formulation development and shelf-life studies of locally isolated bio-fertilizer strains. Octa J. Environ. Res. 2014;2:1. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Timmusk S, Behers L, Muthoni J, Muraya A, Aronsson AC. Perspectives and challenges of microbial application for crop improvement. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:49. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Suberu Y, Akande I, Samuel T, Lawal A, Olaniran A. Optimization of protease production in indigenous Bacillus species isolated from soil samples in Lagos, Nigeria using response surface methodology. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019;18:101011. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.01.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yusupova YR, Skripnikova VS, Kivero AD, Zakataeva NP. Expression and purification of the 5′-nucleotidase YitU from Bacillus species: Its enzymatic properties and possible applications in biotechnology. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020;104(7):2957–2972. doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10428-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jiang CH, Liao MJ, Wang HK, Zheng MZ, Xu JJ, Guo JH. Bacillus velezensis, a potential and efficient biocontrol agent in control of pepper gray mold caused by Botrytis cinerea. Biol. Control. 2018;126:147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2018.07.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Palazzini JM, Dunlap CA, Bowman MJ, Chulze SN. Bacillus velezensis RC 218 as a biocontrol agent to reduce Fusarium head blight and deoxynivalenol accumulation: Genome sequencing and secondary metabolite cluster profiles. Microbiol. Res. 2016;192:30–36. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2016.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pandin C, Le Coq D, Deschamps J, Védie R, Rousseau T, Aymerich S, Briandet R. Complete genome sequence of Bacillus velezensis QST713: A biocontrol agent that protects Agaricus bisporus crops against the green mould disease. J. Biotechnol. 2018;278:10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.04.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vila A, Usall J, Torres R, Solsona C, Teixidó N. Enhanced shelf-life of the formulated biocontrol agent Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA-8 combining diverse packaging strategies and storage conditions. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2019;290:205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2018.10.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ambardar S, Vakhlu J. Plant growth promoting bacteria from Crocus sativus rhizosphere. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;29:2271–2279. doi: 10.1007/s11274-013-1393-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ambardar S, Sangwan N, Manjula A, Rajendhran J, Gunasekaran P, Lal R, Vakhlu J. Identification of bacteria associated with underground parts of Crocus sativus by 16S rRNA gene targeted metagenomic approach. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;30:2701–2709. doi: 10.1007/s11274-014-1694-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kour R, Ambardar S, Vakhlu J. Plant growth promoting bacteria associated with corm of Crocus sativus during three growth stages. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2018;67(5):458–464. doi: 10.1111/lam.13042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Luster J, Gottlein A, Nowack B, Sarret G. Sampling, defining, characterizing and modeling the rhizosphere—the soil science tool box. Plant Soil. 2009;321:457–482. doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9781-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ashwini N, Srividya S. Potentiality of Bacillus subtilis as biocontrol agent for management of anthracnose disease of chilli caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides OGC1. 3 Biotech. 2014;4(2):127–136. doi: 10.1007/s13205-013-0134-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Brick JM, Bostock RM, Silverstone SE. Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on nitrocellulose membrane. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1991;57:535–538. doi: 10.1128/AEM.57.2.535-538.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Maheswar NU, Sathiyavani G. Solubilization of phosphate by Bacillus Sps, from groundnut rhizosphere (Arachis hypogaea L) J. Chem. Pharm Res. 2012;4(8):4007–4011. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pal RB, Gokaran K. Siderophores and pathogenicity of microorganisms. J. Biosci. Tech. 2010;1:127–134. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mohammed AI, Gupta SG. Studies on enzymatic characteristics of select cultures for preparation of beneficial microbial consortium for composting of municipal solid waste. Adv. Biores. 2011;2(1):166–173. [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Khan MA, Ahmad N, Zafar AU, Nasir IA, Qadir MA. Isolation and screening of alkaline protease producing bacteria and physio-chemical characterization of the enzyme. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2011;10:6203–6212. doi: 10.5897/AJB10.2194. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Idris HA, Labuschagne N, Korsten L. Screening rhizobacterial for biological control of Fusarium root and crow rot of sorghum in Ethiopia. Biol. Cont. 2007;40:97–106. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.07.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fierer N, Breitbart M, Nulton J, Salmon P, Lozupone C, Jones R, Robeson M, Edward RA, Felts B, Rayhawk S, Knigh R, Rohwer F, Jackson RB. Metagenomics and small subunit rRNA analysis reveal the genetic diversity of bacteria, archaea, fungi and virus in soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2007;73(21):7059–7066. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00358-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Stecher G, Tamura K, Kumar S. Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis (MEGA) for macOS. Mol. Bio. Evol. 2020;37(4):1237–1239. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msz312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Brown J, Pirrung M, McCue AL. FQC dashboard: Integrates FastQC results into a web-based, interactive, and extensible FASTQ quality control tool. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:3137–3139. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Meyer F. The RAST Server: Rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genom. 2008;9(1):75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Overbeek R, Olson R, Pusch GD, Olsen GJ, Davis JJ, Disz T, Vonstein V. The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST) Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(1):206–214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(14):1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res. 2004;14(7):1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Belbahri L, Chenari Bouket A, Rekik I, Alenezi FN, Vallat A, Luptakova L, Rateb ME. Comparative genomics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strains reveals a core genome with traits for habitat adaptation and a secondary metabolites rich accessory genome. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1438. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Gertz EM, Yu YK, Agarwala R, Schäffer AA, Altschul SF. Composition-based statistics and translated nucleotide searches: Improving the TBLASTN module of BLAST. BMC Biol. 2006;4(1):1–14. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-4-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, Cutcutache I, Rozen S, Madden TL. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinform. 2012;13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bhooma V, Nagasathiya K, Vairamani M, Parani M. Identification of synthetic dyes magenta III (new fuchsin) and rhodamine Bas common adulterants in commercial saffron. Food Chem. 2020;309:125793. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125793. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Zhao M, Wang B, Xiang L, Xiong C, Shi Y, Wu L, Sun W. A novel onsite and visual molecular technique to authenticate saffron (Crocus sativus) and its adulterants based on recombinase polymerase amplification. Food Control. 2019;100:117–121. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2019.01.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Koocheki A, Karbasi A, Seyyedi SM. Some reasons for saffron yield loss over the last 30 years period. Saffr. Agron. Technol. 2017;5:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Hashem A, Tabassum B, Abd-Allah EF. Bacillus subtilis: A plant-growth promoting rhizobacterium that also impacts biotic stress. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2019;26(6):1291–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Shafi J, Tian H, Ji M. Bacillus species as versatile weapons for plant pathogens: a review. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2017;31(3):446–459. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2017.1286950. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Song B, Rong YJ, Zhao MX, Chi ZM. Antifungal activity of the lipopeptides produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens anti-CA against Candida albicans isolated from clinic. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;1:463–474. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5000-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Aloo BN, Makumba BA, Mbega ER. The potential of bacilli rhizobacteria for sustainable crop production and environmental sustainability. Microb. Res. 2019;219:26–39. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2018.10.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Enebe MC, Babalola OO. The impact of microbes in the orchestration of plants’ resistance to biotic stress: A disease management approach. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019;103(1):9–25. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9433-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kashyap BK, Solanki MK, Pandey AK, Prabha S, Kumar P, Kumari B. Plant Health Under Biotic Stress. Berlin: Springer; 2019. Bacillus as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a promising green agriculture technology; pp. 219–236. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Freitas MA, Medeiros FH, Carvalho SP, Guilherme LR, Teixeira WD, Zhang H, Pare PW. Augmenting iron accumulation in cassava by the beneficial soil bacterium Bacillus subtilis (GBO3) Front. Plant Sci. 2015;6:596. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Aziz Z, Halimi MS, Khairuddin AR, Osumanu HA. Variable responses on early development of shallot (Allium ascalonicum) and mustard (Brassica juncea) plants to Bacillus cereus inoculation. Malays. J. Microbiol. 2012;8(1):47–50. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lee S, Ka J, Song H. Growth promotion of Xanthium italicum by application of rhizobacterial isolates of Bacillus aryabhattai in microcosm soil. J. Microbiol. 2012;50(1):45–49. doi: 10.1007/s12275-012-1415-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ramesh A, Sharma SK, Sharma MP, Yadav N, Joshi OP. Inoculation of zinc solubilizing Bacillus aryabhattai strains for improved growth, mobilization and biofortification of zinc in soybean and wheat cultivated in Vertisols of central India. Appl. Soil Ecol. 2014;73:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2013.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Park YG, Mun BG, Kang SM, Hussain A, Shahzad R, Seo CW, Lee IJ. Bacillus aryabhattai SRB02 tolerates oxidative and nitrosative stress and promotes the growth of soybean by modulating the production of phytohormones. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0173203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhao P, Quan C, Wang Y, Wang J, Fan S. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens Q-426 as a potential biocontrol agent against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. spinaciae. J. Basic Microbiol. 2014;54(5):448–456. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201200414. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chowdhury SP, Hartmann A, Gao X, Borriss R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42—a review. Front. Microbiol. 2015;6:780. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Singh J, Singh AV, Upadhayay VK, Khan A. Comparative evaluation of developed carrier based bio-formulations bearing multifarious PGP properties and their effect on shelf life under different storage conditions. Environ. Ecol. 2020;38(1):96–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Basheer J, Ravi A, Mathew J, Krishnankutty RE. Assessment of plant-probiotic performance of novel endophytic Bacillus spp. in talc-based formulation. Probiot. Antimicrob. Proteins. 2019;11(1):256–263. doi: 10.1007/s12602-018-9386-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Bhattacharyya C, Bakshi U, Mallick I, Mukherji S, Bera B, Ghosh A. Genome-guided insights into the plant growth promotion capabilities of the physiologically versatile Bacillus aryabhattai strain AB211. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:411. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Brahim, A. H., Lobna, D., Mouna, J., Asmahen, A., Houda, H., Manel, B. A. & Mamdouh, B. E. N. Bacillus sp. BCLRB2: An efficient diazotrophic Halotolerant PGPB strain (2019).
  • 67.Franco-Sierra ND, Posada LF, Santa-María G, Romero-Tabarez M, Villegas-Escobar V, Álvarez JC. Bacillus subtilis EA-CB0575 genome reveals clues for plant growth promotion and potential for sustainable agriculture. Func. Integr. Genomic. 2020;2:1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10142-020-00736-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bagri J, Yadav A, Anwar K, Dkhar J, Singla-Pareek SL, Pareek A. Metabolic shift in sugars and amino acids regulates sprouting in Saffron corm. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10528-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Xia Y, Farooq MA, Javed MT, Kamran MA, Mukhtar T, Ali J, Chaudhary HJ. Multi-stress tolerant PGPR Bacillus xiamenensis PM14 activating sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) red rot disease resistance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020;2:2. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Xiang N, Lawrence KS, Kloepper JW, Donald PA, McInroy JA. Biological control of Heterodera glycines by spore-forming plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on soybean. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(7):e0181201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Guo D, Yuan C, Luo Y, Chen Y, Lu M, Chen G, An D. Biocontrol of tobacco black shank disease (Phytophthora nicotianae) by Bacillus velezensis Ba168. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 2020;10:4523. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Karthika S, Midhun SJ, Jisha MS. A potential antifungal and growth-promoting bacterium Bacillus sp. KTMA4 from tomato rhizosphere. Microb. Pathog. 2020;142:49. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2020.104049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Zhou G, Li L, Lu J, Li J, Yao C, Sun P. Qian X (2020) Flower cultivation regimes affect apocarotenoid accumulation and gene expression during the development of saffron stigma. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2020;2:2. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Eppinger M, Bunk B, Johns MA, Edirisinghe JN, Kutumbaka KK, Koenig SS, Creasy HH, Rosovitz JM, Riley RD, Daugherty S, Martin M, Elbourne HDL, Paulsen I, Biedendieck KR, Braun C, Grayburn S, Dhingra S, Nchuk LV, Ball B, Qamar UR, Seibel J, Bremer E, Jahn D, Ravel EJ, Vary SP. Genome sequences of the biotechnologically important Bacillus megaterium strains QM B1551 and DSM319. J. Bacertiol. 2011;193(16):4199–4213. doi: 10.1128/JB.00449-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Allard-Massicotte R, Tessier L, Lécuyer F, Lakshmanan V, Lucier JF, Garneau D, Beauregard PB. Bacillus subtilis early colonization of Arabidopsis thaliana roots involves multiple chemotaxis receptors. M Bio. 2016;7(6):e01664–e1716. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01664-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Yi HS, Ahn YR, Song GC, Ghim SY, Lee S, Lee G, Ryu CM. Impact of a bacterial volatile 2, 3-butanediol on Bacillus subtilis rhizosphere robustness. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:993. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ryu CM, Farag MA, Hu CH, Reddy MS, Wei HX, Pare PW, Kloepper JW. Bacterial volatiles promote growth in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2003;100(8):4927–4932. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0730845100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Tahir HA, Gu Q, Wu H, Raza W, Hanif A, Wu L, Gao X. Plant growth promotion by volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus subtilis SYST2. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:171. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gotor-Vila A, Teixidó N, Di Francesco A, Usall J, Ugolini L, Torres R, Mari M. Antifungal effect of volatile organic compounds produced by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens CPA-8 against fruit pathogen decays of cherry. Food microbiol. 2017;64:219–225. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2017.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ray S, Datta R, Mitra AK. From space to Earth: Bacillus aryabhattai found in the Indian sub-continent. Biosci. Discov. 2012;3:138–145. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (217.8KB, pdf)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES