Abstract
Objective
To assess the association between common survivorship issues and characteristics of breast cancer survivors presenting at a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.
Methodology
This study was conducted in the medical oncology department of Jinnah Medical Postgraduate Center from March 27, 2019, to September 27, 2019. A number of 257 females of age group 18-90 years who had either completed their treatment or were undergoing treatment at the time were included using non-probability consecutive sampling techniques. Face-to-face interviews were personally conducted by the researcher, and data regarding the socio-demographics and common survivorship issues faced by breast cancer patients were obtained. The data acquired were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY).
Results
The mean age of the breast cancer survivors were 42.58 ± 10.07 years. Of the main challenges, lack of energy received the highest mean score of 3.44 ± 1.26, followed by fatigue and financial issues. Overall the most common survivorship issue were financial issues (81.3%), followed by fatigue (80.9%), cessation of the menstrual cycle (66.1%), weak social support (59.1%), and cosmetic disfigurement (51.8%).
Conclusion
Breast cancer survivors have various psychological, medical, and social issues and may require unique attention during follow-up visits.
Keywords: breast neoplasms, financial stress, survivorship, social support, mastectomy, psycho-oncology, psychophysiology, cancer survivors
Introduction
One of the most prevalent malignancies among females is breast cancer. Globally, in 2018 the incidence of breast cancer was estimated as 25% of all cancers [1]. Within the last 10 years, the incidence of breast cancer has increased by 6%, mortality rates have decreased significantly and at present, 80% of early breast cancer patients survive for more than 10 years [2]. In 2010, there were an estimated 500,000 breast cancer survivors and by 2040 it is expected to cross two million survivors [3]. The five-year survival rate of breast cancer differs from country to country. In India, the survival rate was estimated as 60%, in Malaysia as 68%, in South Africa as 53%, in Mongolia as 57% and in Oceania and North America up to 89% [4].
The rate of survival of breast cancer patients has been significantly enhanced with improvements and availability of therapy. However, literature has shown that women with breast cancer who have undergone chemotherapy, radiotherapy, biotherapy or hormonal therapy, surgery, and reconstructive surgery may face numerous psychosocial and physical issues and as well as a compromised overall quality of life [5].
After adjuvant therapy, most of the women encounter weight gain, musculoskeletal pain, hot flashes, nausea, and itching around the genital area. [6] The sexual desire of breast cancer survivors is also highly affected after therapy and may experience fatigue, loss of nipple sensitivity, vaginal dryness, and scarring [6]. Psychological problems such as sadness, anxiety, and depression owing to therapy, recurrence, and bodily disfigurement stay constant after diagnosis and cure. Besides, the lack of support and communication from their partners, family, and friends reduced their social integration [5, 7]. Survivors of breast cancer are also at high risk of secondary health issues such as cardiovascular disease, cessation of the menstrual cycle, and poor bone health (osteoporosis) [8]. Other common issues are low physical activity and poor dietary habits, which are associated with recurrence of breast cancer [9]. The majority of breast cancer survivors are unable to rejoin their respective occupations due to their inability to work. This is associated with a high financial burden because the resources to pay consultation fees, medical bills, and medications become limited, therefore they show poorer medication adherence [10].
As the survival rate of breast cancer is increasing, the long-term social, physical, and psychological issues are also becoming very common among them. There is no data available in Pakistan addressing the most common issues which have a significant impact on the quality of their life. So, the current research aimed to assess the common survivorship issues faced by breast cancer patients. This research would be helpful for health professionals to better understand the needs of recovered patients, identify issues and develop strategies to resolve them so that women can have a good quality of life.
Materials and methods
It was a cross-sectional study performed at the department of the medical oncology department of Jinnah Medical Postgraduate Center from March 2019 to September 2019. The sample size of 257 was estimated using the OpenEpi online sample size calculator by taking proportion as 0.28 [5] of vaginal dryness among breast cancer survivors, absolute precision as 5.5%, and 95% confidence level. All the females of age 18-90 years who had completed their treatment and who were on treatment were included using the non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Women with psychiatric problems, having pregnancy, a history of recurrent disease, and who didn’t give consent were excluded from the study.
Approval from the hospital's ethical review committee was sought before data collection and informed written or verbal consent was taken from all the eligible females. Face-to-face interviews were personally conducted by the researcher and information was noted in the questionnaire while maintaining the confidentiality and privacy of data.
The questionnaire was divided into two parts, the first part included the questions regarding the socio-demographic properties of the participants and the second part included the questions regarding the common survivorship issues faced by breast cancer patients. The issues were evaluated using "Breast cancer prevention trial symptoms scale (BCPT)" and "Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system (CARES)" [11-13]. The BCPT scale assessed the symptoms such as fatigue, nausea, hot flashes, cognitive problems, musculoskeletal pain, weight problems, vaginal problem, bladder problem, arm problems, and sexual interest whereas the CARE scale was used to evaluate the psychological issues. Furthermore, medical issues such as any cardiovascular problem, hormonal blockade, and osteoporosis within the last one month were assessed using the medical history of the patients. The questions regarding the weak family support, financial strain and cosmetic issues were also asked. The females reported the severity of each problem experienced by them in the last one month on a five-point Likert scale of 0 (not all) to 4 (extremely). The cutoff scores for bladder and vaginal problems, as well as other medical and social issues, were taken as ≥4; for hot flashes, weight and arm problems, fatigue and sexual interest as ≥6; for musculoskeletal and cognitive problems as ≥8, and for psychological problems as ≥12. The final questionnaire was translated into Urdu and pre-testing of the final questionnaire was done in 10 survivors of breast cancer and Cronbach’s alpha value was calculated as 0.72.
All the data was entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY). Quantitative variables were described as mean and SD, while qualitative variables were displayed as frequency and proportion. The common survivorship issues were stratified with respect to age, residence, socioeconomic status, education, and marital status. The post-stratification chi-square test was applied. The p-value<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.
Results
The mean age of the 257 breast cancer survivors was 42.90 ± 10.39 years. The mean BMI was reported as 26.90±5.96 kg/m2. The majority of the patients were living in urban areas (73.9%) whereas 67 were from rural areas (26.1%). Out of 257, most of them were illiterate (n=90; 35%) followed by primary (n=81; 31.5%), secondary (n=49; 19.1%), intermediate (n=22, 8.6%) and graduate (n=15, 5.8%). Also, 185 (72%) had low socioeconomic status (monthly income <15,000 rupees), 67 (26.1%) had middle socioeconomic status (monthly income 15,000-30,000 rupees) and only five (1.9%) had high socioeconomic status (monthly income >30,000 rupees). The majority of the females were married (n=210, 81.7%) whereas 47 (18.3%) were unmarried. Individual responses and mean scores of breast cancer survivorship issues by study participants are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1. Mean scores and distribution of breast cancer survivorship issues in study participants.
| Survivorship Issues | Not at all (0) | A little (1) | Fair (2) | Much (3) | Very much (4) | Mean ± SD |
| Hot flashes | ||||||
| a. Hot flashes | 74(28.8%) | 7(2.7%) | 37(14.4%) | 38(14.8%) | 101(39.3%) | 2.33 ± 1.67 |
| b. Night sweats | 116(45.1%) | 4(1.6%) | 18(7.0%) | 37(14.4%) | 82(31.9%) | 1.86 ± 1.8 |
| Bladder control | ||||||
| Loss of bladder control | 175(68.1%) | 4(1.6%) | 11(4.3%) | 14(5.4%) | 53(20.6%) | 1.09 ± 1.67 |
| Vaginal problems | ||||||
| Vaginal dryness | 108(42%) | 9(3.5%) | 52(20.2%) | 16(6.2%) | 72(28%) | 1.75 ± 1.69 |
| Musculoskeletal problems | ||||||
| a. General aches and pain | 71(27.6%) | 2(0.8%) | 8(3.1%) | 15(5.8%) | 161(62.6%) | 2.75 ± 1.77 |
| b. Joint pain | 188(73.2%) | 5(1.9%) | 0(0.0%) | 4(1.6%) | 60(23.3%) | 1 ± 1.7 |
| c. Muscle stiffness | 194(75.5%) | 5(1.9%) | 0(0.0%) | 4(1.6%) | 54(21%) | 0.91 ± 1.65 |
| Weight problems | ||||||
| a. Unhappy with appearance of owns body | 139(54.1%) | 10(3.9%) | 22(8.6%) | 20(7.8%) | 66(25.7%) | 1.47 ± 1.74 |
| b. Weight gain | 169(65.8%) | 2(0.8%) | 6(2.3%) | 15(5.8%) | 65(25.3%) | 1.24 ± 1.77 |
| Cognitive problems | ||||||
| a. Forgetfulness | 166(64.6%) | 8(3.1%) | 7(2.7%) | 18(7%) | 58(22.6%) | 1.2 ± 1.72 |
| b. Difficulty concentrating | 153(59.5%) | 21(8.2%) | 10(3.9%) | 6(2.3%) | 67(26.1%) | 1.27 ± 1.74 |
| c. Easily distracted | 185(72%) | 5(1.9%) | 11(4.3%) | 15(5.8%) | 41(16%) | 0.92 ± 1.56 |
| Arm problems | ||||||
| a. Decreased range of motion of affected arm | 186(72.4%) | 6(2.3%) | 7(2.7%) | 11(4.3%) | 47(18.3%) | 0.94 ± 1.6 |
| b. Arm swelling | 203(79%) | 6(2.3%) | 10(3.9%) | 9(3.5%) | 29(11.3%) | 0.66 ± 1.37 |
| Fatigue | ||||||
| a. Tiredness | 26(10.1%) | 0(0.0%) | 9(3.5%) | 43(16.7%) | 179(69.6%) | 3.36 ± 1.23 |
| b. Lack of energy | 33(12.8%) | 0(0.0%) | 3(1.2%) | 24(9.3%) | 197(76.7%) | 3.37 ± 1.34 |
| Sexual interest | ||||||
| a. Lack of interest in sex | 73(28.4%) | 28(10.9%) | 33(12.8) | 18(7%) | 105(40.9%) | 2.21 ± 1.71 |
| b. Low sexual enjoyment | 96(37.4%) | 28(10.9%) | 36(14%) | 44(17.1%) | 53(20.6%) | 1.73 ± 1.59 |
| Psychological problems | ||||||
| a. Felt worried and anxious about future | 85(33.1%) | 5(1.9%) | 8(3.1%) | 31(12.1%) | 128(49.8%) | 2.44 ± 1.81 |
| b. Felt despair about health | 71(27.6%) | 0(0.0%) | 10(3.9%) | 27(10.5%) | 149(58%) | 2.71 ± 1.74 |
| c. Felt sad depressed and lost interest | 119(46.3%) | 17(6.6%) | 29(11.3%) | 31(12.1%) | 61(23.7%) | 1.6 ± 1.69 |
| d. Felt angry and irritable | 123(47.9%) | 10(3.9%) | 27(10.5%) | 29(11.3%) | 68(26.5%) | 1.65 ± 1.74 |
| Other medical issues | ||||||
| a. Cardiovascular issue | 184(71.6%) | 31(12.1%) | 18(7%) | 4(1.6%) | 20(7.8%) | 0.62 ± 1.19 |
| b. Cessation of menstrual cycle | 56(21.8%) | 18(7.0%) | 8(3.1%) | 5(1.9%) | 170(66.1%) | 2.84 ± 1.71 |
| c. Osteoporosis | 136(52.9%) | 35(13.6%) | 14(2%) | 2(0.8%) | 70(27.2%) | 1.36 ± 1.72 |
| Other social issues | ||||||
| a. Financial issue | 36(14%) | 7(2.7%) | 3(1.2%) | 2(0.8%) | 209(81.3%) | 3.33 ± 1.45 |
| b. Weak family support | 68(26.5%) | 5(1.9%) | 12(4.7%) | 24(9.3%) | 148(57.6%) | 2.7 ± 1.73 |
| c. Cosmetic issue | 110(42.8%) | 3(1.2%) | 6(2.3%) | 5(1.9%) | 133(51.8%) | 2.19 ± 1.95 |
The lack of energy recorded the highest mean score at 3.44 ± 1.26, followed by fatigue and financial issues. Overall the most common survivorship issue was financial issues (n=209; 81.3%), followed by fatigue (n=08; 80.9%), cessation of menstrual cycle (n=170; 66.1%), weak social support (n=152; 59.1%), and cosmetic disfigurement (n=133; 51.8%) as displayed in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Frequency of Common Survivorship Issues.
Stratification with respect to age, residence, educational status, socioeconomic status, and marital status was done to see the effect on survivorship issues. The issue of hot flashes showed a statistically significant relationship with age, educational status, and marital status (p<0.05). Bladder problems showed a statistically significant relationship with age, residence, and marital status (p<0.05). The vaginal, musculoskeletal, and weight problems, as well as cessation of menstrual cycle showed a statistically significant relationship with age, residence, and educational status (p<0.05). Cognitive and arm problems showed a statistically significant relationship with age and residence (p<0.05). Fatigue showed a statistically significant relationship with age, educational status, socio-economic status, and marital status (p<0.05). Lack of sexual interest was statistically significant with respect to age and marital status (p<0.05). Psychological issues showed a statistically significant relationship with educational status (p<0.05). Osteoporosis showed a statistically significant relationship with residence and educational status (p<0.05). Financial stress showed a statistically significant relationship with educational status, socio-economic status, and marital status (p<0.05). Weak social support showed a statistically significant relationship with educational status and socio-economic status (p<0.05). Cosmetic disfigurement showed a statistically significant relationship with educational status (p<0.05). More stratifications are mentioned in Table 2.
Table 2. Stratification of Common Survivorship Issues with Patient Characteristics.
HF=Hot flash, BP=Bladder problem, VP=Vaginal problem, MP=Musculoskeletal problem, WP=Weight problem, CP=Cognitive problem, AP= Arm problem, F=Fatigue, SI=Sexual interest, PI=Psychological issues, CI=Cardiac issues, O=Osteoporosis, CM=Cessation of menstrual cycle, FS=Financial stress, WS=Weak social support, CD=Cosmetic disfigurement, * = significant p<0.05
| HF | BP | VP | MP | WP | CP | AP | F | SI | PI | CI | O | CM | FS | WS | CD | |
| Age Groups | ||||||||||||||||
| <45 years | 53 | 21 | 58 | 38 | 43 | 19 | 19 | 122 | 82 | 37 | 12 | 41 | 127 | 127 | 89 | 86 |
| ≥45 years | 31 | 32 | 14 | 36 | 10 | 18 | 23 | 86 | 22 | 23 | 8 | 29 | 43 | 82 | 63 | 47 |
| P-value | 0.778 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.027* | 0.001* | 0.155 | 0.015* | 0.029* | 0.001* | 0.971 | 0.858 | 0.506 | 0.001* | 0.448 | 0.188 | 0.34 |
| Residence | ||||||||||||||||
| Rural | 62 | 46 | 47 | 61 | 32 | 36 | 25 | 153 | 76 | 39 | 12 | 58 | 115 | 152 | 108 | 99 |
| Urban | 22 | 7 | 25 | 13 | 21 | 1 | 17 | 55 | 28 | 21 | 8 | 12 | 55 | 57 | 44 | 34 |
| P-value | 0.975 | 0.017* | 0.049* | 0.048* | 0.012* | 0.001* | 0.02* | 0.779 | 0.797 | 0.072 | 0.139 | 0.046* | 0.001* | 0.359 | 0.206 | 0.848 |
| Educational status | ||||||||||||||||
| Illiterate | 20 | 15 | 27 | 15 | 27 | 16 | 12 | 67 | 31 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 55 | 72 | 56 | 50 |
| Primary | 10 | 5 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 15 | 8 | 2 | 13 |
| Secondary | 11 | 13 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 43 | 26 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 27 | 39 | 31 | 18 |
| Intermediate | 33 | 18 | 16 | 35 | 13 | 8 | 12 | 74 | 30 | 15 | 4 | 32 | 60 | 74 | 53 | 38 |
| Graduate or above | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 17 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 16 | 10 | 14 |
| P-value | 0.005* | 0.336 | 0.001* | 0.039* | 0.003* | 0.046* | 0.093 | 0.010* | 0.098 | 0.044* | 0.218 | 0.022* | 0.027* | 0.017* | 0.011* | 0.001* |
| Socioeconomic status | ||||||||||||||||
| <15,000 rupees | 61 | 34 | 53 | 58 | 44 | 28 | 29 | 153 | 69 | 50 | 13 | 49 | 121 | 168 | 137 | 99 |
| 15,000-30,000 rupees | 19 | 18 | 19 | 14 | 8 | 9 | 12 | 53 | 33 | 9 | 7 | 19 | 44 | 41 | 15 | 33 |
| >30,000 rupees | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| P-value | 0.06 | 0.339 | 0.37 | 0.23 | 0.121 | 0.615 | 0.892 | 0.051* | 0.232 | 0.078 | 0.54 | 0.776 | 0.271 | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.299 |
| Marital Status | ||||||||||||||||
| Unmarried (n=22) | 27 | 18 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 6 | 11 | 43 | 1 | 8 | 4 | 9 | 28 | 43 | 33 | 22 |
| Married (n=98) | 57 | 35 | 63 | 64 | 45 | 31 | 31 | 165 | 103 | 52 | 16 | 61 | 142 | 166 | 119 | 111 |
| P-value | 0.001* | 0.001* | 0.134 | 0.208 | 0.5 | 0.725 | 0.147 | 0.042* | 0.001* | 0.257 | 0.837 | 0.168 | 0.292 | 0.048* | 0.088 | 0.453 |
Discussion
Most survivors after and during breast cancer treatment delight in their longer lifespan, but there is currently little knowledge accessible from their view about the most prevalent and important problems they face. Hence, the current study explored the challenges faced by breast cancer survivors and its association with different factors.
In Asia, developing countries have overcrowded and scarce resources in public hospitals so patients mostly prefer private hospitals for better management. Therefore, the treatment and follow-up is very costly. The majority of the breast cancer survivors struggle with financial stress [14]. In a study by Pietrangelo, about 36% of the women reported being unable to continue their job and lose their careers after surviving breast cancer [15]. In the current study financial issues were the most frequent challenge associated with survivorship among breast cancer patients. The financial constraints were associated with the educational status, socioeconomic background, and marital status of the survivors (p<0.05). In the results of the longitudinal research on breast cancer survivors, it was shown that most of them encountered economic hardships, where out of pocket expenses were 40% among participants with < $500 expenditure [16]. In another research by Fenn in the US, 18% of breast cancer survivors had financial issues and showed a statistically significant association with family income (p<0.05) [17]. A study conducted in Pakistan showed that 35% of the breast cancer survivors belonged to low socioeconomic groups and had five-year disease-free and overall survival of 31% and 45% respectively (p<0.05) [18].
Another challenge faced by survivors was chronic fatigue ranging from 4% to 91%, mainly influencing the quality of life. Fatigue was noted in 50% of the patients after the first five years of therapy [19]. This was in accordance with our study. In a meta-analysis, the prevalence of severe fatigue was reported as 7-52% in breast cancer survivors with pooled prevalence as 27% [20].
The hormonal therapies have shown a significant reduction in the rate of mortality and recurrence rate by 30% and 31% respectively [21]. However, the most common side effects of these therapies are reported as vaginal dryness and hot flashes. In addition, it is also associated with the cessation of the menstrual cycle [22]. In the current research, vaginal dryness, and cessation of menstrual cycle were reported in association with age, residence, and education level (p<0.05). In previous research, almost half of the breast cancer survivors had reported at least one hot flash in the past 1 day (45%) or past seven days (52%) and the majority of them had mild to asymptomatic severity [23]. In another similar research by Sapkota et al. conducted in Nepal, the frequency of hot flashes was reported as 45% and the mean rank for hot flashes was higher in females who had completed their treatment within 1 year. In addition, the percentage of vaginal problems was reported as 28% among them [5].
In Asia, heavily patriarchal culture is present, the final verdict is made by the family's head. Their assistance and choice to go for therapy is therefore very important in breast cancer management. In such situations, if the family is not supportive, patients suffer from psychosocial distress and mental complications [7]. Therefore, strong emotional & social support from family and friends play a vital role in the life of breast cancer survivors. In Pakistan, a study by Banning et al. showed that initially, family support is present however later on it becomes inconsiderate for the patient's family. The patients showed more concerns regarding their children, husband, and family, rather than their own selves [24]. In the current research, weak social support was observed in 59.1% of the females and it was more in low socioeconomic status and illiterate females (p<0.05). In the previous study, social problems were one of the significant issues among breast cancer survivors and had a high mean rank score of 23.9 among women of age <45 years [5]. This is similar to the present study, young women (<45 years) had a high frequency of weak social support.
Breast cancer treatment involves mastectomy that has side effects such as scarring, weight gain, body dysfunction, and cosmetic disfigurement that have universal female sexuality and womanhood connotations. The change in body image often leads to dissatisfaction and bodily shame and low self-esteem [9]. Bodily disfigurement and sexual dysfunction have a major influence on psychological as physiological aspects of breast cancer survivors. It also affected the sex life of their partners [9]. As young breast cancer patients are more sexually active, lack of sexuality plays an important role [25]. The intrapsychic capacity of females changes due to a sexual dysfunction that involves negative body image, fear of fertility loss, loss of femininity, absence of sexual interest, and shifts to a sense of sexual self [25]. In the present study, the majority of the breast cancer survivors lack their interest in sex due to sexual dysfunction and it was prevalent among age groups less than 45 years (p<0.05). The married females had more sexual dysfunctionality as compared to unmarried and showed statistically significant differences (p<0.05). Furthermore, the frequency of cosmetic disfigurement was 51.8%. In a previous study, the breast cancer survivors reported poor sexual dysfunction and sexual satisfaction as 45% and 44% respectively. About 81% of them showed less sexual sense/desire and 43% of them presented with dyspareunia. Furthermore, 42% of them had anxiety and 44% had depression which was significantly associated with body image (p<0.05) [25].
Conclusions
The present study offers insight into the challenges faced by survivors of breast cancer. It is important to keep a strict follow-up after completion of treatment. The clinicians should assess whether the survivors need counseling from a professional psychologist or any lifestyle modifications. Future studies should focus on the impact of small support group meetings for overcoming the survivor’s medical and psychological issues.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan issued approval Onc-7833. The approval from the hospital's ethical review committee was sought before data collection. Informed written or verbal consent was taken from all the eligible females. The face to face interviews were personally conducted by the researcher and information was noted in the questionnaire while maintaining the confidentiality and privacy of data.
Animal Ethics
Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue.
References
- 1.WCRF WCRF. Vol. 18. World Cancer Research Fund International; [Jan;2021 ]. 2018. WCRF: Worldwide cancer data, Global cancer statistics for the most common cancers. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Deletion analysis of chromosome 13q14. 3 and characterisation of an alternative splice form of LEU1 in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Rowntree C, Duke V, Panayiotidis P, Kotsi P, Palmisano GL, Hoffbrand AV, Foroni L. Leukemia. 2002;16:1267. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402551. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Projections of cancer prevalence in the United Kingdom, 2010-2040. Maddams J, Utley M, Moller H. Br J Cancer. 2012;107:1195–1202. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Breast cancer in Pakistan: a looming epidemic. Begum N. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29394963/ J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2018;28:87–88. doi: 10.29271/jcpsp.2018.02.87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Problems of breast cancer survivors living in an urban area of Nepal. Sapkota A, Shrestha S, Sedhain A, Koirala S, Kafle P. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2016;3:289–296. doi: 10.4103/2347-5625.189818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Changes in sexual life experienced by women in Taiwan after receiving treatment for breast cancer. Chang YC, Hu WY, Chang YM, Chiu SC. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2019;14:1. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2019.1654343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Psychosocial care for cancer patients. Weis J. Breast Care (Basel) 2015;10:84–86. doi: 10.1159/000381969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.National Research Council. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press; 2006. From Cancer Patient to Cancer Survivor: Lost in Transition. [Google Scholar]
- 9.A review of breast cancer survivorship issues from survivors' perspectives. Cho J, Jung SY, Lee JE, et al. J Breast Cancer. 2014;17:189–199. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.3.189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Financial hardships experienced by cancer survivors: a systematic review. Altice CK, Banegas MP, Tucker-Seeley RD, Yabroff KR. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:2. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.The BCPT symptom scales: a measure of physical symptoms for women diagnosed with or at risk for breast cancer. Stanton AL, Bernaards CA, Ganz PA. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:448–456. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Psychometric properties of a tool for measuring hormone-related symptoms in breast cancer survivors. Alfano CM, McGregor BA, Kuniyuki A, et al. Psychooncology. 2006;15:985–1000. doi: 10.1002/pon.1033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cancer rehabilitation evaluation system questionnaire: a disease-specific and treatment-specific measure of rehabilitation needs and self-reported quality of life. Kumar SP, D'Souza M, Sisodia V, Kumar KV. Indian J Palliat Care. 2014;20:243–244. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.138403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.The challenges confronting public hospitals in India, their origins, and possible solutions. Bajpai V. Advances in Public Health. 2014;27:243–244. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pietrangelo A. Breast cancer survivors have a bigger problem after treatment: the cost. [Feb;2021 ];Pietrangelo A. https://www.healthline.com/health-news/breast-cancer-survivors-have-problem-after-treatment-the-cost#1. Health News. 2018
- 16.Long-term financial burden of breast cancer: experiences of a diverse cohort of survivors identified through population-based registries. Jagsi R, Pottow JA, Griffith KA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1269–1276. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.0956. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fenn K. Yale Medicine Thesis Digital Library. Vol. 1. New Haven: Yale Medicine; [Feb;2021 ]. 2014. Fenn K. Is the financial burden of cancer impacting survivors' quality of life? pp. 1–59. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Socioeconomic status and breast cancer survival in Pakistani women. Aziz Z, Sana S, Akram M, Saeed A. https://mail.jpma.org.pk/article-details/477. J Pak Med Assoc. 2004;54:448–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Cancer related fatigue in breast cancer survivors: in correlation to demographic factors. Tabrizi FM, Alizadeh S. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5649030/ Maedica (Bucur) 2017;12:106–111. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Risk factors, prevalence, and course of severe fatigue after breast cancer treatment: a meta-analysis involving 12 327 breast cancer survivors. Abrahams HJ, Gielissen MF, Schmits IC, Verhagen CA, Rovers MM, Knoop H. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:965–974. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Endocrine therapy for early breast cancer: updated review. Tremont A, Lu J, Cole JT. http://www.ochsnerjournal.org/content/17/4/405.abstract. Ochsner J. 2017;17:405–411. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Breast cancer survivorship: a comprehensive review of long-term medical issues and lifestyle recommendations. Bodai BI, Tuso P. Perm J. 2015;19:48–79. doi: 10.7812/TPP/14-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hot flashes in breast cancer survivors: frequency, severity and impact. Chang HY, Jotwani AC, Lai YH, Jensen MP, Syrjala KL, Fann JR, Gralow J. Breast. 2016;27:116–121. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.The impact of culture and sociological and psychological issues on Muslim patients with breast cancer in Pakistan. Banning M, Hafeez H, Faisal S, Hassan M, Zafar A. Cancer Nurs. 2009;32:317–324. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e31819b240f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sexuality after breast cancer: cultural specificities of Tunisian population. Leila M, Nada C, Kais C, Jawaher M. Pan Afr Med J. 2016;25:17–24. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2016.25.17.10399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

