Abstract
Background
Increasing familiarity and practice might free up mental resources during laparoscopic surgical skills training. The aim of the study was to track changes in mental resource allocation during acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills.
Methods
Medical students with no previous experience in laparoscopic surgery took part in a 5-week laparoscopic training curriculum. At the beginning and end of the training period, one of the training tasks was combined with a secondary auditory detection task that required pressing a foot switch for defined target tones, creating a dual-task situation. During execution of the two concurrent tasks, continuous electroencephalographic measurements were made, with special attention to the P300 component, an index of mental resources. Accuracy and reaction times of the secondary task were determined.
Results
All 14 participants successfully completed the training curriculum. Target times for successful completion of individual tasks decreased significantly during training sessions (P <0.001 for all tasks). Comparing results before and after training showed a significant decrease in event-related brain potential amplitude at the parietal electrode cluster (P300 component, W = 67, P = 0.026), but there were no differences in accuracy (percentage correct responses: W = 48, P = 0.518) or reaction times (W = 42, P = 0.850) in the auditory detection task.
Conclusion
The P300 decrease in the secondary task over training demonstrated a shift of mental resources to the primary task: the surgical exercise. This indicates that, with more practice, mental resources are freed up for additional tasks.
Introduction
The rapid progress in surgery with increasing use of laparoscopic and robotic-based minimally invasive techniques presents new challenges for the acquisition of surgical skills. Simulation-based training is used widely to develop motor skill learning1 needed for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) (similar to that when learning a musical instrument2,3). The learner must cope with different haptics, two-dimensional image interpretation, and the fulcrum effect with paradoxical movement in many situations. Attentional resources available in novices are limited owing to the complexity of the task, especially at the beginning of the learning curve, interfering with ability to cope with disturbances or complications during the exercise or during an operation. A number of different simulation environments have been developed to study the learning trajectories for different skills required for MIS, and to assess the accuracy, speed, and efficiency of movements1,4–9.
The neuroscience literature on the acquisition of motor skills is sparse regarding the neural underpinnings and prerequisites of skill learning10–13, and this has been largely neglected in the development of simulator-based MIS training programmes. Instead, the number of repetitions has been used widely as rough discriminator of motor skill competence.
Brain event-related brain potentials (ERPs) are small voltage fluctuations in the human electroencephalogram (EEG) that can be recorded non-invasively from the intact scalp of a volunteer, and are induced by external events, such as sensory stimuli14. The ERPs are extracted from the EEG by averaging over a number of similar events.
The execution of two (or more) concurrent tasks (dual tasking) is integral to cognitive performance, and requires attentional control to allocate resources to each of the tasks15,16. As an example, in conditions with diminished mental resources, such as Alzheimer’s disease, people stop walking when they start to talk, because the mental resources are taken up by talking and are not sufficient to support parallel walking17. Inability to perform dual tasking during an operation is commonly encountered among novice surgical trainees18,19, but may also be seen in experienced surgeons during complex operations.
ERPs have been used extensively20–25 to assess mental resource allocation in dual-task situations. In particular, the P300 component of the ERP to stimuli in the secondary task has been used as a marker to track control dynamics in the primary task23,26–28.
This experimental study involved a dual-task situation in which an additional auditory detection task was included during a laparoscopic surgical task. Mental resources at the beginning and end of a 5-week laparoscopic training programme were evaluated using ERPs. The hypothesis was that laparoscopic training and increasing familiarity in performing laparoscopic tasks should free up mental resources for additional (secondary) tasks.
Methods
Lübeck Toolbox curriculum
The Lübeck Toolbox (LTB) curriculum was used for MIS training. It consisted of six related exercises: pack your luggage, weaving, Chinese jump rope, triangle cut, hammer cut, and suturing (Fig. 1). The LTB exercises were performed as described previously9.
Fig. 1.
Six training tasks of the Lübeck Toolbox and duration of exercises
Tasks: a pack your luggage, b weaving, c Chinese jump rope, d triangle cut, e hammer cut, and f suturing. g Mean(s.d.) duration per quartile of performed runs per exercise.
The LTB video box trainer (LTB Germany, Lübeck, Germany) and the following instruments were used for MIS training: atraumatic grasping forceps (Endopath® 5-mm Overholt 5DCD; Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA), laparoscopic scissors (Endopath® laparoscopic scissors, curved, 5mm; Ethicon Endo-Surgery) and needle drivers (Endopath® 5-mm needle holder E705R; Ethicon Endo-Surgery). Vicryl™ SH PLUS 3-0 (Ethicon, Norderstedt, Germany) was used as suture.
Lübeck Toolbox curriculum analysis
The number of repetitions and duration of each repetition to reach a defined training criterion was used to operationalize the learning progress. These numbers were obtained from previous studies on the LTB curriculum8,9. For each exercise and subject, quartiles of the numbers of repetitions were calculated and used to derive the mean duration per quartile. For each exercise, the Friedmann test was applied to test for significant learning progress (R version 3.5.1; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Study design and event-related potential task
This was an experimental study performed in the Departments of Surgery and Neurology, University of Lübeck, Germany. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Universität zu Lübeck (ethics committee protocol 19-095). Informed consent was obtained from all participants at the beginning of the study. Medical students with no previous experience in laparoscopic surgery took part in a 5-week laparoscopic training programme according to the LTB curriculum. At the beginning and the end of the LTB curriculum, the study participants participated in a dual task with EEG recording. The primary task was the pack-your-luggage exercise from the LTB, and the secondary task comprised an auditory change detection task. A jingle at the beginning of each run indicated ‘begin with the pack-your-luggage exercise’. With an offset of 2 s, the auditory change detection task started. Two alternating tones (800 and 880 Hz, interstimulus interval (ISI) 1100 ms) were presented via headphones. With a probability of 0.1, a tone was repeated instead of presenting an alternative one. It was the subject’s task to indicate a sound repetition by pushing a foot switch with their dominant foot. Sound loudness was adjusted individually at the beginning of each session to a comfortable level. The change detection task was implemented in Psychtoolbox version 3.0.14 (http://psychtoolbox.org, running under Matlab® 2018b (https://mathworks.com), and Windows® 7 (Microsoft, Redmond, Washington, USA)). The tones were presented via Sennheiser headphones (Wedemark, Germany) connected to a Steinberg U12 USB audio interface (Hamburg, Germany). Auditory stimulus presentation was stopped when participants finished the training task.
Electroencephalogram recording and analysis
EEGs were recorded using 16 gtec Sahara dry electrodes connected to a gtec USB amplifier system (Thanstetten, Austria). Electrodes (F3, Fz, F4, Fc5, Fcz, Fc6, C3, Cz, C4, Cp5, Cp6, P3, Pz, Oz) were mounted in an elastic cap and referenced to the right mastoid. To control for eye movement artefacts, bipolar standard electrodes were placed at the left and right outer canthus of the eyes (horizontal electro-oculographic (HEOG) aretefacts), and below and above the right eye (vertical electro-oculographic (VEOG) artefacts). Data were recorded using a sampling rate of 250 Hz (bandpass filtered 0.1–30 Hz). EEGLAB39 and ERPLAB40 toolboxes were used for EEG data analysis. The EEG data processing pipeline comprised epoching to the stimulus presentation (–1500 to 1500 ms), and identification of EOG and other artefacts using independent component analysis implemented in EEGLAB. Subsequently, identified artefact components were subtracted from the EEG data, and individual ERPs for the conditions before/after training × standard/target were calculated by averaging per condition and subject using the mean activity between –100 and 0 ms as baseline. Finally, ERPs were individually standardized using z-transformation. Because of excessive movement artefacts, two subjects had to be excluded from the analysis, resulting in a final sample of 12 subjects. Parietal attention effects were parameterized by averaging potentials across the centroparietal/parietal electrode positions Cp5, Cp6, P3, Pz, and P4, and calculating the mean amplitude between 400 and 600 ms after stimulus presentation. For the statistical evaluation of the training effect, we first calculated the difference between standard and target tone per subject and condition (before/after training). The resulting difference scores were subjected to a Wilcoxon matched pairs test comparing the before with the after training condition. The use of the non-parametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs test is determined by the group size.
Results
Lübeck Toolbox curriculum
All 14 participants (mean(s.d.) age 26.07(2.33) years; 10 women) successfully completed the LTB curriculum. The median number of repetitions participants needed to reach the criterion for the LTB exercises was 30 (range 24–70) for the luggage task, 40 (24–72) for weaving, 32 (12–71) for Chinese jump rope, 27 (11–76) for triangle cut, 23 (9–52) for hammer cut, and 17 (11–56) for suturing. The mean exercise times for the LTB tasks per quartile decreased significantly over time for each of the seven training sessions all (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1).
Auditory task: event-related potentials and behaviour
ERP analysis revealed a large positivity at central–parietal electrode sites for the target tone before training (Figs 2 and 3). This effect was absent after training. Comparison of the difference target–standard tone between before and after training revealed a significant effect at the parietal electrode cluster (W = 67, P = 0.026). This decrease in ERP amplitude was not accompanied by significant before–after differences in accuracy (percentage correct responses: W = 48, P = 0.518) and reaction times (W = 42, P = 0.850) in the auditory change detection task.
Fig. 2.
Grand average of z-standardized event-related potentials obtained time-locked to presentation of the standard alternating tone and repeating target tone
Recordings from electrode positions a F3, b Fz, c F4, d Fc5, e Fcz, f Fc6, g Cp5, h Cz, i Cp6, j P3, k Pz, and l P4. Target tones were associated with a large parietal P300 component at the beginning of the training period which was greatly diminished in the session at the end of training. Baseline was –100 to 0 ms. ERP, event-related potential.
Fig. 3.
Results for auditory change detection task, and amplitude of z-transformed event-related potentials
Mean(s.d.) a percentage correct and b reaction times for auditory change detection task before and after training. c Mean(s.d.) amplitude of z-transformed event-related potentials (ERPs) averaged across electrode positions Cp5, Cp6, P3, Pz, and P4 before and after training.
Discussion
The LTB features several tasks that mimic surgical techniques used in minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery. The present study corroborated earlier results obtained with the LTB8,9, that naive trainees rapidly improved performance to criterion within several training sessions. The repeated (target) tones were associated with a P300 component in the ERP.
The amplitude of the P300 component has been interpreted as an index for mental resources that are available for processing of the task at hand, with reduced P300 indicating reduced mental resources23,25–28. The reduced P300 amplitude to auditory target stimuli at the end of the training period therefore indicates that fewer resources are allotted to the secondary auditory task and, by inference, more resources are available for the primary surgical motor task. The increasing speed and precision of the surgical task was thus achieved by recruitment of mental processing sources, shielding the important primary task from interference by the auditory task. It seems reasonable to conclude that, in this early training stage, improvement is mainly due to reallocation of mental resources.
In both animals and humans, learning of a new skill entails an initial phase of rapid improvement in performance, and a subsequent phase of more gradual improvements as skills become more automatic29–31.These stages are characterized by distinct neural mechanisms. In experimental studies, the early stages of visuomotor learning have been shown to involve the dorsomedial striatum, equivalent to the caudate nucleus in primates, whereas the later phases concerning automatization of the behaviour are supported by the dorsolateral striatum, equivalent to the putamen in primates29,32,33. Functional neuroimaging has been used to describe distinct early and late phases of motor sequence learning with regard to activation of the motor cortex in adult humans31. It has also been shown that, with extensive practice, dual-task costs diminish and task coordination improves owing to task automatization34,35, and/or learning of the component tasks with practice36–38.
The present study attests to the value of ERPs in tracking changes in mental resource allocation during acquisition of MIS skills. Neuroscientific measures can reveal different stages of skill learning, and have the potential for evaluation of MIS surgical skills acquisition independent of roughly defined numerical repetitions. Although the present research was restricted to novice learners and only tracked the first stages of skill learning, studies examining dual-task performance over a long period of time as well as those involving expert surgeons might point to greater applicability, such as the ability to differentiate between trained and untrained surgeons or indicators of progress during a learning curve.
Acknowledgements
M.T. and M.H. contributed equally to this work. T.F.M. is supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and the German Federal Ministry of Research and Technology. Analytical methods, study materials, and the data sets generated during the present study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Disclosure. The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Contributor Information
M Thomaschewski, Department of Surgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
M Heldmann, Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Institute of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
J C Uter, Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
D Varbelow, Department of Surgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
T F Münte, Department of Neurology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; Institute of Psychology II, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
T Keck, Department of Surgery, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Funding
DFG
German Federal Ministry of Research and Technology
References
- 1. Buckley CE, Kavanagh DO, Traynor O, Neary PC. Is the skillset obtained in surgical simulation transferable to the operating theatre? Am J Surg 2014;207:146–157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Hund-Georgiadis M, von Cramon DY. Motor-learning-related changes in piano players and non-musicians revealed by functional magnetic-resonance signals. Exp Brain Res 1999;125:417–425 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Altenmüller E, Furuya S. Brain plasticity and the concept of metaplasticity in skilled musicians. Adv Exp Med Biol 2016;957:197–208 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zendejas B, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Cook DA. State of the evidence on simulation-based training for laparoscopic surgery: a systematic review. Ann Surg 2013;257:586–593 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Seymour NE, Gallagher AG, Roman SA, O’Brien MK, Bansal VK, Andersen DK et al. Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double blinded study. Ann Surg 2002;236:458–463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Fraser SA, Klassen DR, Feldman LS, Ghitulescu GA, Stanbridge D, Fried GM. Evaluating laparoscopic skills: setting the pass/fail score for the MISTELS system. Surg Endosc 2003;17:964–967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ritter EM, Scott DJ. Design of a proficiency-based skills training curriculum for the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery. Surg Innov 2007;14:107–112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Laubert TTM, Auerswald P, Zimmermann M, Brüheim L, Keck T, Benecke C. Implementation of a laparoscopic simulation training in undergraduate medical education—the Lübeck Toolbox-Curriculum. Zentralbl Chir 2017;142:1–7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Laubert T, Esnaashari H, Auerswald P, Höfer A, Thomaschewski M, Bruch HP et al. Conception of the Lübeck Toolbox curriculum for basic minimally invasive surgery skills. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2018;403:271–278 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Molenberghs P, Cunnington R, Mattingley JB. Brain regions with mirror properties: a meta-analysis of 125 human fMRI studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2012;36:341–349 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Ossmy O, Mukamel R. Perception as a route for motor skill learning: perspectives from neuroscience. Neuroscience 2018;382:144–153 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Papale AE, Hooks BM. Circuit changes in motor cortex during motor skill learning. Neuroscience 2018;368:283–297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Makino H, Hwang EJ, Hedrick NG, Komiyama T. Circuit mechanisms of sensorimotor learning. Neuron 2016;92:705–721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Luck SJ. An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2014 [Google Scholar]
- 15. Fernandes MS, Moscovitch M. Divided attention and memory: evidence of substantial interference effects at retrieval and encoding. J Exp Psychol Gen 2000;129:155–176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Naveh-Benjamin M, Craik FIM, Guez J, Kreuger S. Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary costs. J Exp Psychol: Learn Mem Cogn 2005;31:520–537 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Camicioli R, Howieson D, Lehman S, Kaye J. Talking while walking: the effect of a dual task in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1997;48:955–958 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Mathias AP, Vogel P, Knauff M. Different cognitive styles can affect performance in laparoscopic surgery skill training. Surg Endosc 2019;34:4866–4873 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Taatgen NA, Huss D, Dickison D, Anderson JR. The acquisition of robust and flexible cognitive skills. J Exp Psychol Gen 2008;137:548–565 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Duncan SJ, Gosling A, Panchuk D, Polman RCJ. Validation of a multidirectional locomotive dual-task paradigm to evaluate task-related differences in event-related electro-cortical activity. Behav Brain Res 2019;361:122–130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Han M, Shi L, Jia S. Attentional resources modulate error processing-related brain electrical activity: evidence from a dual-task design. Brain Res 2017;1670:68–75 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Zendel BR, de Boysson C, Mellah S, Démonet JF, Belleville S. The impact of attentional training on event-related potentials in older adults. Neurobiol Aging 2016;47:10–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Scheer M, Bülthoff HH, Chuang LL. Steering demands diminish the early-P3, late-P3 and RON components of the event-related potential of task-irrelevant environmental sounds. Front Hum Neurosci 2016;10:73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Kida T, Kaneda T, Nishihira Y. Dual-task repetition alters event-related brain potentials and task performance. Clin Neurophysiol 2012;123:1123–1130 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Schubert M, Johannes S, Koch M, Wieringa BM, Dengler R, Münte TF. Differential effects of two motor tasks on ERPs in an auditory classification task: evidence of shared cognitive resources. Neurosci Res 1998;30:125–134 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Isreal JB, Chesney GL, Wickens CD, Donchin E. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. Psychophysiology 1980;17:259–273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Wickens CD, Kramer AF, Vanasse L, Donchin E. Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. Science 1983;221:1080–1082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Sirevaag EJ, Kramer AF, Coles MGH, Donchin E. Resource reciprocity: an event-related potentials analysis. Acta Psychol 1989;70:77–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Yin HH, Mulcare SP, Hilário MR, Clouse E, Holloway T, Davis MI et al. Dynamic reorganization of striatal circuits during the acquisition and consolidation of a skill. Nat Neurosci 2009;12:333–341 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Luft AR, Buitrago MM. Stages of motor skill learning. Mol Neurobiol 2005;32:205–216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Karni A, Meyer G, Jezzard P, Adams MM, Turner R, Ungerleider LG. Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning. Nature 1995;377:155–158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Miyachi S, Hikosaka O, Lu X. Differential activation of monkey striatal neurons in the early and late stages of procedural learning. Exp Brain Res 2002;146:122–126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Miyachi S, Hikosaka O, Miyashita K, Karadi Z, Rand MK. Differential roles of monkey striatum in learning of sequential hand movement. Exp Brain Res 1997;115:1–5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Schneider W, Shiffrin RM. Controlled and automatic human information processing: 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev 1977;84:1–66 [Google Scholar]
- 35. Logan GD. Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychol Rev 1988;95:492–527 [Google Scholar]
- 36. Ahissar M, Laiwand R, Hochstein S. Attentional demands following perceptual skill training. Psychol Sci 2001;12:56–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Maquestiaux F, Hartley AA, Bertsch J. Can practice overcome age-related differences in the psychological refractory period effect? Psychol Aging 2004;19:649–667 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Strobach T, Schubert T. No evidence for task automatization after dual-task training in younger and older adults. Psychol Aging 2017;32:28–41 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Delorme A, Makeig S. EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. J Neurosci Methods 2004;134:9–21 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Lopez-Calderon J, Luck SJ. ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Front Hum Neurosci 2014;8:213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



