Policymakers worldwide now recognise that digital transformation is fundamental to the creation of high-reliability health systems and there is now, as a result, very considerable global investment in health information technology and data science capability.1 The English Global Digital Exemplar Programme, launched in the aftermath of the dismantling of the highly centralised National Programme for Information Technology,2 arose from the recognition of marked differences in digital capability between early adopters, digital-ready hospitals and those deemed not yet ready for digitisation.3 Twenty-three relatively digitally mature hospitals received substantial short-term funding to become Global Digital Exemplars. They were paired with slightly less mature Fast Follower hospitals that would benefit from their experience, including through the creation of best practice models (‘Blueprints’), which would, it was hoped, subsequently be disseminated across the wider National Health Service (NHS). Our ongoing independent evaluation has shown that the Global Digital Exemplar Programme has accelerated digital maturity and transformation in these select sites through the competitive allocation of funds, reputational benefits and a raised profile of digital transformation among hospital leadership.4
There are, however, growing concerns about the digital capability divide among English hospitals, which needs to be bridged if we are to avoid creating a two-tier secondary care sector. The announcement by the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care of the Digital Aspirant Programme aims to respond to this divide.5,6 These efforts to promote digitisation in less digitally adept hospitals are, however, only likely to succeed if they maintain and build on the knowledge sharing and networking established during the existing Global Digital Exemplar Programme (Figure 1).
Figure 1.
Proposed model to drive forward system-wide digital transformation.
The Global Digital Exemplar Programme has delivered a boost to digitisation through external (and matched internal) funding and through securing senior hospital leadership engagement, resulting in alignment of effort and clinical buy-in. However, competitive allocation of funding tends to favour already well-resourced hospitals (thereby accentuating unevenness). A supporting framework is required to promote the spread of experience and expertise across the NHS by incentivising knowledge sharing and networking. This can be facilitated through strategically building on organic relationships, regional links and common technological platforms.7
Less digitally mature hospitals are typically struggling on many fronts, including leadership, capacity building, finances and staff recruitment/retention. In view of these challenges, central government is likely to feel compelled to closely monitor deployment of national resources, and compliance checks and/or penalties are therefore likely.8 However, such programme assessment must avoid reporting requirements that might overlook local priorities or stifle innovation. Moreover, there is increasing recognition that continuous digital transformation needs to be a central pillar of safe, efficient and high-quality care, as reflected by the fact that the Care Quality Commission (the independent regulator of health and social care for England) is planning to incorporate digital infrastructure as a key part of its national safety and quality assessments.9
As a result of the Global Digital Exemplar Programme, a select group of English NHS hospitals is making substantial progress in digitising its hospital infrastructure. A large number of less digitally mature hospitals are, however, left behind. The forthcoming Digital Aspirant programme and the broadening of Care Quality Commission inspections are welcome developments that should help to bridge this gap (Figure 1), but given the overhaul these hospitals will need to make, it is imperative that the Department of Health and Social Care both maintains and incentivises Global Digital Exemplar and Fast Follower sites to engage with Digital Aspirants to share their hard-earned lessons and help catalyse the spread of digital maturity of hospitals throughout NHS England.
Footnotes
Provenance: Not commissioned; peer-reviewed by Peter Aspinall.
ORCID iD: Kathrin https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6634-9537
Declarations
Competing Interests: All authors are investigators on the evaluation of the Global Digital Exemplar programme (https://www.ed.ac.uk/usher/digital-exemplars). AS was a member of the Working Group that produced Making IT Work, and was an assessor in selecting Global Digital Exemplar sites.
Funding: This article has drawn on a programme of independent research funded by NHS England. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, NHSX, NHS England, or NHS Digital. The views expressed in this publication are those of the authors.
Ethics approval: Not applicable.
Guarantor: KC is guarantor
Contributors: KC, RW and AS conceived this paper. KC led the write-up.
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge the input of the wider Global Digital Exemplar Evaluation team: Professor Bryony Dean Franklin, Dr Marta Krasuska, Wendy Lane, Dr Hajar Mozaffar, Kathy Mason, Sally Eason, Dr Susan Hinder, Dr Hung The Nguyen, and Dr Henry W. W. Potts.
References
- 1.Blumenthal D. Implementation of the federal health information technology initiative. New Engl J Med 2011; 365: 2426–2431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.The Lancet. The NHS IT nightmare. Lancet 2011; 378: 542–542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Making IT Work: Harnessing the Power of Health Information Technology to Improve Care in England. See: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/550866/Wachter_Review_Accessible.pdf (last checked 24 February 2020).
- 4.Global Digital Exemplar Programme Evaluation – Research Outputs. See https://www.ed.ac.uk/usher/digital-exemplars/publications-and-research-outputs (last checked 24 February 2020).
- 5.NHSX Targets ‘Hopelessly Old Laptops’ and Tightens Grip on Tech Spending. See https://www.hsj.co.uk/technology-and-innovation/nhsx-targets-hopelessly-old-laptops-and-tightens-grip-on-tech-spending/7027015.article (last checked 24 February 2020).
- 6.Matt Hancock Announces New Programme to Help NHS Trusts Go Digital. See https://www.digitalhealth.net/2019/12/matt-hancock-announces-new-programme-to-help-nhs-trusts-go-digital/ (last checked 6 March 2020).
- 7.Stewart J, Hyysalo S. Intermediaries, users and social learning in technological innovation. Int J Innov Manag 2008; 12: 295–325. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) Strategies to Optimize Your Practice. See https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/tools/nlc_continuousqualityimprovementprimer.pdf (last checked 24 February 2020).
- 9.Care Quality Commission. See https://www.cqc.org.uk/ (last checked 24 February 2020).

