Skip to main content
Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis logoLink to Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis
. 2020 May 30;91(4-S):271–275. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9578

Medial epicondyle avulsion after elbow dislocation in an adolescent non-professional soccer player treated with a cannulated screw: a case report

Alessio Pedrazzini 1,✉, Alberto Visigalli 2, Piergiulio Valenti 2, Nicola Bertoni 1, Henry Yewo Simo 1, Roberto Bisaschi 1, Vanni Medina 1, Bianca Pedrabissi 1, Francesco Ceccarelli 2, Francesco Pogliacomi 2
PMCID: PMC7944818  PMID: 32555109

Abstract

Background and aim of the work:

Medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus account for 11–20% of all elbow injuries in children and in 30–55% of cases they are associated with an elbow dislocation. Undisplaced fractures are usually treated conservatively but literature is controversial regarding the treatment of displaced fractures (≥5mm) in paediatric fractures. In recent years, there is an emerging consensus that such patients may benefit more from open reduction and internal fixation. Authors report a case of a 15 years old nonprofessional soccer player who suffered of an elbow dislocation with an intra-articular fragment derived from avulsion of the medial epicondyle.

Methods:

Clinical and instrumental evaluation confirmed elbow dislocation with an intra-articular fragment derived of the medial epicondyle. After the reduction an open reduction and internal fixation with cannulated screw was performed.

Results:

Clinical evaluation after 90 days showed resolution of pain and almost complete ROM and complete recovery of strength and of functionality of the operated limb. Furthermore, x-rays demonstrated consolidation of the fracture.

Conclusions:

this case confirms that a precise evaluation of the fracture and its displacement is at the base of satisfactory outcomes. If fracture is displaced ≥5mm and patient is near skeletal maturity open reduction and fixation is indicated. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Keywords: elbow, dislocation, medial epicondyle, reduction, fixation, screw, outcome

Introduction

The medial epicondyle is a traction apophysis which is constantly solicited during elbow movements by the powerful epicondylar muscles and the medial collateral ligament. These structures, thus including capsule, are considered the key of elbow stability (1,2).

Medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus account for 11–20% of all elbow injuries in children and in 30–55% of cases they are associated with an elbow dislocation (3, 4).

Avulsion of the medial epicondyle and elbow dislocation occurs when a valgus force is exerted with the elbow completely or slightly extended. This lesion can only occur as a result of damage of the capsuloligamentous and anteromedial muscular structures (5).

The literature is controversial regarding the management of these pediatric fractures: disagreement lies particularly in identifying the correct treatment for children with considerable displacement (≥5 mm) (6).

Some reports suggest that displaced medial epicondyle fractures can be nonoperatively treated but more than 60% of patients have radiographic nonunion or valgus instability and elbow stiffness is common (7,8).

For these reasons, in recent years, there is an emerging consensus that such patients may benefit more from open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) (9, 10).

The most commonly used methods for the fixation of displaced fractures include Kirschner wires in younger patients with open physis and screws with or without a washer in adolescent near skeletal maturity (11).

This case reports of a medial epycondile avulsion in an adolescent soccer player near skeletal maturity which was synthesized with 1 cannulated screw.

Case Report

A 15-year-old male, non-professional soccer player, arrived at the emergency department complaining of pain and swelling in his left elbow.

He reported intense pain following a fall on his elbow during a soccer match; no vascular or nervous impairments were detected.

After the clinical visit an elbow dislocation was suspected; x-rays confirmed this suspicion (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

X-ray and 3D CT with fracture-dislocation of the left elbow.

The patient also underwent to a CT scan, which confirmed the dislocation and also demonstrated the presence of an intra-articular fragment resulting from the avulsion of the medial epicondyle(figure 1).

The dislocation was therefore reduced in deep sedation, but clinically valgus instability, and intra-articular impingement could be yet appreciated; no vascular or nervous impairments were detected after the reduction.

Radiographs and a CT following sedation showed the success of the reduction and the presence of a big intra-articular fragment (figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

X-rays and 3D CT after reduction. Arrows show intra-articular fragment

The day after the patient had ORIF of the fragment with a cannulated screw and a washer though a medial approach.

The ulnar nerve, which is potentially vulnerable during this approach, was identified, isolated and protected (figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Identification and protection of the ulnar nerve.

The intra-articular fragment was then identified and reduced in its anatomical position; it was first stabilized with a kirschner wire and definitively synthesized with a cannulated half threaded screw with a washer (figure 4 and 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Reduction of the fragment and fixation with a cannulated half threaded screw and one washer.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Postoperative radiographs.

After 14 days of cast immobilization patient followed an intensive physiotherapy program of 40 days characterized by progressive assisted active and passive kinesis and idrokinesis therapy. The final check 90 days after surgery showed that the operated limb had no deficit in bending with respect to the healthy one.

In extension, there was a deficit of 5 degrees (table 1); no residual pain and no lack of strength was present. The patient was satisfied with the result achieved. X-rays demonstrated consolidation of the fracture (Figure 6).

Table 1.

Flexion and extension of both elbows.

Right (healthy) Left (operated)
Flexion 40° 43°
Extention 180° 175°

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

X-rays and clinical evaluation 90 days after surgery.

Discussion

The medial epicondyle is the anatomic origin of the flexor carpi radialis, flexor carpi ulnaris, flexor digitorum superficialis, palmaris longus, part of the pronator teres, and the ulnar collateral ligament; it is constantly solicited during elbow movements by the powerful epicondylar muscles and the medial collateral ligament. All these structures, thus including capsule, are considered the key of elbow stability.

The medial epicondyle is the last ossification centre to fuse to the distal humerus. Fusion usually occurs after 15 years of age (12).

Medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus account for 11–20% of all elbow injuries in children and in 30–55% of cases they are associated with an elbow dislocation (3,4).

There are 3 theories about the mechanism of acute medial epicondylar apophyseal injuries: a direct blow, an isolated avulsion mechanism, and an association with elbow dislocation (13,14).

The literature is controversial regarding the management of these paediatric fractures: disagreement lies particularly in identifying the correct treatment for lesions with considerable displacement (≥5 mm) (6).

There is a consensus that fractures displaced <2 mm should be treated conservatively with a plaster cast; instead those with displacement ≥5 mm should be treated surgically.

Most common treatments include kirschner wires and cannulated screw fixation (15).

Kirschenr wires should be preferred, in younger patients who still have open physis (and therefore growth potential), because this approach minimizes the risk of developing cubitus varus deformity due to a screw across the growing apophysis. Instead, cannulated screws with or without a washer should be used in adolescent near skeletal maturity, where the possible complications mentioned above are minimal (16). Furthermore, operative treatment with ORIF has a crucial role in avoiding the painful nonunion and minimizing the risk of symptomatic valgus instability.

In this type of injuries not only bone has to be considered. Fracture often reflects significant damage to «invisible» soft tissue. The capsular, ligamentous and muscular injuries are often underestimated and a high degree of instability may be masked in an undisplaced or minimally displaced fracture (17).

For all these reasons Authors decided to fix the epicondyle with ORIF. Outcomes confirmed that this decision was indicated.

Conclusions

Results confirm that all patients, with medial epicondyle avulsion with displacement ≥5 mm, with or without elbow dislocation should be surgically treated. ORIF with screws is preferred in adolescent near skeletal maturity, thus diminishing non-union, residual valgus instability and elbow stiffness rate.

Conflict of interest:

Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article

References

  • 1.Wilkins KE, Chambers HG. Fractures involving the medial epicondylar apophysis. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins KE, Beaty JH., editors. Fracture in children 4. Vol. 4. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1996. pp. 801–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Schwab GH, Bennet JB, Wood GW, Tullos HS. Biomechanics of elbow instability: the role of the medial collateral ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1980;146:42–52. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fahey JJ. Fractures of the elbow in children. AAOS Inst Course Lect. 1960;17:13–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Rang M. 2nd Edn. Philadelphia: J B Lippincott Lippincott; 1983. Children’s fractures; p. 9. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kilfoyle RM. Fracture of the medial condyle and epicondyle of the elbow in children. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1965;41:43–50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Kamath AF, Baldwin K, Horneff J, Hosalkar HS. Operative versus non-operative management of pediatric medial epicondyle fractures: a systematic review. J Child Orthop. 2009;3:345–57. doi: 10.1007/s11832-009-0192-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Josefsson PO, Danielsson LG. Epicondylar elbow fracture in children: 35-year follow-up of 56 unreduced cases. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica. 1986;57:313–15. doi: 10.3109/17453678608994399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lee HH, Shen HC, Chang JH, Lee CH, Wu SS. Operative treatment of displaced medial epicondyle fractures in children and adolescents. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:178–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Duun PS, Ravn P, Hansen LB, Buron B. Osteosynthesis of medial humeral epicondyle fractures in children: 8-year follow-up of 33 cases. Acta Orthop Scandinavica. 1994;65:439–41. doi: 10.3109/17453679408995489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pathy R, Dodwell ER. Medial epicondyle fractures in children. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2015;27:58–66. doi: 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Patel NM, Ganley TJ. Medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus: how to evaluate and when to operate. J Pediatr Orthop. 2012;32:S10–3. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e31824b2530. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilkins KE. Fractures of the medial epicondyle in children. Instr Course Lect. 1991;40:3–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Smith FM. Medial epicondyle injuries. JAMA. 1950;142(3):96–402. doi: 10.1001/jama.1950.02910240014004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Watson-Jones R. Primary nerve lesions in injuries of the elbow and wrist. J Bone Joint Surg. 1930;12:121–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wilkins KE. Fractures involving the medial epicondylar apophysis. In: Rockwood CA Jr, Wilkins KE, King RE., editors. Fractures in children. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: JB Lippincott; 1991. pp. 509–828. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ergin ÖN, Demirel M, Şentürk F, Bayram S, Bilgili F. Long-term comparative study of internal fixation with Kirschner wires or cannulated screws for displaced medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus in children: A 10-year follow-up of 42 cases. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2020 Jan;26(1):137–143. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2019.77348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Louahem DM, Bourelle S, Buscayret F, et al. Displaced medial epicondyle fractures of the humerus: surgical treatment and results. A report of 139 cases. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010;130:649–55. doi: 10.1007/s00402-009-1009-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis are provided here courtesy of Mattioli 1885

RESOURCES