Abstract
The current treatment of distal femur fractures includes locking plating and retrograde intramedullary nailing. These fractures are difficult to manage also for experienced surgeons, with results not always satisfactory. Reported nonunion rates now range from 0 to 34%. Factors associated with nonunion include comorbidities, such as obesity and diabetes, as well as the presence of open fractures, medial bone defects and comminuted fractures. This case report summarizes all of these assumptions and it concerns a 58 years old patient who underwent to 6 surgical procedures before to arrive to bone healing. (www.actabiomedica.it)
Keywords: distal femur, fracture, nonunion, fixation, plating, nailing
Introduction
Supra and intercondylar femur fractures are severe injuries that can be challenging also for more experienced surgeon. Although they account for less than 1% of all fractures and between 3% and 6% of femur fractures, their incidence is likely to increase; these types of traumas follow a bimodal age distribution in geriatric (low energy fractures) and young adult population (high energy traumas) (1-3).
The difficulties in their treatment increase in comminuted, intra-articular and open fractures. Their correct management includes the understanding of the fracture characteristics and a careful preoperative planning comprising implant selection.
The intra-articular fracture should be reduced anatomically and fixed in order to prevent postoperative knee osteoarthritis and stiffness. Metaphyseal comminution and bone loss, especially in open fractures, is a well-documented risk of nonunion and sometimes it is necessary to associate bone grafts that improve stability and healing processes (4, 5).
Current treatment options broadly include retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) and open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF); in any case the surgical goal is to obtain best reduction and maximal stability.
This case report confirms the difficulties in the treatment of this type of fracture which healed only after a long period and multiple surgeries.
Case Presentation
This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. Patient signed informed consent about the treatment he was subjected and the processing of his personal data.
A 58-year-old obese male was involved in a car accident and sustained a polytrauma characterized by an open comminuted intra-articular distal left femur fracture (figure 1) (AO/OTA 33-C3 and 2 Gustilo-Anderson classification) with bone loss and residual gap of about 6 cm at the level of the anterior and medial metaphysis (figure 2), and ipsilateral fractures of the second and third metatarsals (figure 3), of the external proximal tibial plateau and of the patella and dislocation of the third metatarsophalangeal joint.
Figure 1.

Clinical assessment of the antero-distal exposure of the thigh.
Figure 2.

Preoperative knee radiographs and CT views
Figure 3.

Preoperative left foot radiographs with fractures of the second and third metatarsals and dislocation of the third metatarsophalangeal joint
He was initially treated in emergency with debridement of the exposure, stabilization of the distal femur with an external fixator, screw fixation of the ipsilateral tibial fracture and of the metatarsals with Kirschner wires.
Seven days later the final osteosynthesis of the femur was performed with LISS plate and screws in association with anterior and medial cortical allograft; the patella was stabilized with screws (figure 5)
Figure 5.

Postoperative radiographs following surgery 7 days after injury
Figure 4.

Postoperative x-rays after acute initial surgery
Two months later patients started assisted weigth bearing but in the following period x-rays showed cortical bone graft rupture and metal devices loosening (figure 6).
Figure 6.

X-rays views 2 and 4 months after surgery with rupture of the cortical graft and device loosening
At this time inflammation indexes were high but scintigraphy with granulocytes excluded an acute infection. The patient underwent a second surgery in which the previous devices were removed and a new osteosynthesis with longer L.I.S.S. plate associated to another autologous cortical allograft and autologous bone from iliac crest was performed (figure 7).
Figure 7.

X-rays views after second procedure of osteosynthesis
Samples of tissue were taken from nonunion outbreak for microbiological/cultural tests. Bacteriological findings demonstrated Klebsiella Pneumoniae infection, which was treated with targeted antibiotic therapy, up to normalize the inflammation indexes (about 2 months) and another scintigraphy did not show signs of infection.
Eight months after this second surgery patient complained of a sudden pain during walking. The radiological evaluation revealed the rupture of the plate and cortical graft in a framework of nonunion of the metaphyseal fracture, despite healing of its articular component. Elevated inflammation indexes as well as positive scintigraphy led us to suspect an underlying silent infection (figure 8).
Figure 8.

Plate’s and cortical graft rupture. Radiographs and intraoperative view
As consequence metallic devices were removed, a large bone resection was performed at the pseudoarthrosis stump, multiple tissue material samples were taken for microbiological/culture tests and an antibiotic-based cement spacer (gentamicin) was placed, according to the Masquelet technique. Temporary fixation was obtained with external fixator (figure 9).
Figure 9.

In situ cement spacer and external fixation; intraoperative view and x-rays
Staphylococcus aureus infection was treated with specific antibiotic therapy for two months. After normalization of the inflammation indexes with negative granulocyte scintigraphy, after 3 months of Masquelet, the final surgery was performed. A retrograde intramedullary nail combined with bone marrow taken from the contralateral femur with the RIA technique and cadaveric bone grafts was applied (figure 10).
Figure 10.

Induced membrane after cement removal and radiographs after RIMN and bone marrow and grafts positioning
The patient started assisted weigth bearing after 2 months and 4 months following last surgery x-rays showed the breakage of the proximal static locking screw, which was removed (figure 11).
Figure 11.

Rupture of the proximal static locking screw.
The subsequent monthly checks showed progressive radiological and clinical improvements. Eight months after RIMN pain was absent, patients walked without crutches and x-rays showed consolidation (figure 12).
Figure 12.

X-rays and clinical evaluation 8 months after last surgery with consolidation of the fracture
Discussion
Distal femur fractures not rarely are characterized by unsatisfactory results; this is also the consequence of their severity that makes these injuries technically challenging to operatively treat also for experienced orthopaedics surgeons (4).
In the early 1960s, most distal femur fractures were managed conservatively with fracture bracing and traction, achieving acceptable results in 67% to 90% of patients (6). However, with the advent of new surgical techniques and implants, the pendulum shifted from conservative management to surgical stabilization. Through historical review, Henderson and colleagues chronicled the increasing success rates with operative fixation from 52% to 54% in the 1960s, 73.5% to 75% in the 1970s, to 74% to 80% in the 1980s. Steady advances in our understanding of distal femoral anatomy and fracture biology have heralded various implant designs that further optimized successful treatment of these injuries (6).
Nowadays, surgical treatment can either be RIMN or plate fixation, with plate fixation having a wide indication for various fractures types (5, 6); bone grafts can be associated (7-9).
Recently, many studies have shown results of the LCP fixation and RIMN fixation. LCP and RIMN have been reported to yield better outcomes than traditional non-locking plates (10). Data from large retrospective cohorts (10-13) suggest that there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes, including time to union and union rates, in patients who underwent LCP and RIMN fixation of the distal femur after fracture.
However, the non union rate lies between 0 and 34%, indicating considerable variation (1,14).
Risk factors for non union and delayed bone union in distal femoral fractures include the presence of open fractures, medial bone defects, obesity and comminuted fractures (14,15) as well as surgical mistakes.
In this case report, in which multiple surgeries were necessary to reach bone healing, all these factors were present.
Authors believe that their initial treatment should be criticized for timing (only 7 days from open fracture to definitive surgical treatment) and methodology. The delicate approach of a multi-fragmentary metadiaphyseal and articular fracture should require a system of synthesis that leads to absolute stability, while avoiding the rigidity of the system itself.
The stable plate-screws connection typical of LISS construct, which reduces the risk of secondary loss of reduction providing stability of the implant, could be compromised by wrong choice of plate length and screw positioning.
The guidelines reported by Gautier et al. suggested that a locking compression plate should be used as a bridging plate in order to achieve relative stability. Additionally, the researchers recommended that the plate length used in simple fractures should be 8–10 times longer than the fracture length, 0–3 empty holes should be left in the surrounding space, the distance space should be ≤ 2 mm, and ≥ 3 screws should be inserted (bicortically) into the proximal and distal bone fragments (16). For comminuted fractures, the guidelines recommend that the plate length should be at least 2–3 times longer than the fracture length and ≥ 3 empty holes should be left in the surrounding fracture site.
For these reasons, Authors are critics on their first fixation surgery; plate was too short and together with the cortical graft both determined too much rigidity and the subsequent failure of the synthesis.
Authors also believe that second osteosynthesis was biomechanically better (plate longer and a more dynamic screws positioning) but at this time there was an underestimation of the below infection.
Finally, last surgery determined bone healing as consequence of a precise global management of the infected nonunion (association of specific antibiotic therapy, Masquelet technique, RIMN and marrow and bone grafts) (17-19).
Though, RIMN demonstrated a significantly higher malunion rate when compared with locked plating (20), Authors are confident that they have restored a good axis to the lower limb without disruption of extensor apparatus (21). This is an important fact with a view to future prosthesis (22-25), that, in this case, has to be considered unavoidable as consequence of the combined articular fractures of femur, patella and proximal tibia.
Conclusion
Nonunions are frequent complications in these patterns of fractures; it is difficult to choose an adequate synthesis, to correctly balance the biological and mechanical stimulus. In this specific case the exposition of the fracture, obesity and the superinfection further hindered the healing precesses. The success of the treatment depends on not underestimating infection and to create a fixation which guarantees this balance. Furthermore, autoologous bone marrow and bone grafts are essentials in osteoinduction of healing processes.
Conflict of interest:
Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article
References
- 1.Gwathmey FW, Jr, Jones-Quaidoo SM, Kahler D, Hurwitz S, Cui Q. Distal femoral fractures: current concepts. Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(10):597–607. doi: 10.5435/00124635-201010000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Martinet O, Cordey J, Harder Y, Maier A, Bühler M, Barraud GE. The epidemiology of fractures of the distal femur. Injury. 2000 Sep;31(Suppl 3):C62–3. doi: 10.1016/s0020-1383(00)80034-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Santolini E, West R, Giannoudis PV. Risk factors for long bone fracture non-union: a stratification approach based on the level of the existing scientific evidence. Injury. 2015 Decy;46(Suppl 8):S8–S19. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30049-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gangavalli AK, Nwachuku CO. Management of Distal Femur Fractures in Adults: An Overview of Options. Orthop Clin North Am. 2016 Jan;47(1):85–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ocl.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Saka N, Watanabe Y, Sasaki G, Kawano H. Corrective Intra-Articular Osteotomy Using a 3D-Printed Model and Induced Membrane Technique for AO/OTA C3 Distal Femur Fracture with Articular Malunion and Metaphyseal Nonunion. Case Rep Orthop. 2020 Jan 28;2020:1250231. doi: 10.1155/2020/1250231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Sain A, Sharma V, Farooque KVM, Pattabiraman K. Dual Plating of the Distal Femur: Indications and Surgical Techniques. Cureus. 2019 Dec 27;11(12):e6483. doi: 10.7759/cureus.6483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kiyono M, Noda T, Nagano H, et al. Clinical outcomes of treatment with locking compression plates for distal femoral fractures in a retrospective cohort. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Nov 26;14(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1401-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ehlinger M, Ducrot G, Adam P, Bonnomet F. Distal femur fractures. Surgical techniques and a review of the literature. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 May;99(3):353–60. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2012.10.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Smith WR, Ziran BH, Anglen JO, Stahel PF. Locking plates: tips and tricks. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Oct;89(10):2298–307. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200710000-00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meneghini RM, Keyes BJ, Reddy KK, Maar DC. Modern retrogradeintramedullary nails versus periarticular locked plates for supracondylarfemur fractures after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2014;29:1478–81. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.01.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ebraheim NA, Kelley LH, Liu X, Thomas IS, Steiner RB, Liu J. Periprostheticdistal femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Orthop Surg. 2015;7(4):29–305. doi: 10.1111/os.12199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Matlovich N.F, Lanting B.A, Vasarhelyi E.M, Naudie D.D, McCalden R.W, Howard J.L. Outcomes of surgical management of supracondylar periprostheticfemur fractures. J. Arthroplasty. 2017;32:189–92. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ristevsk BI, Nauth A, Williams DS, Hall JA, Whelan D.B, Bhandari M, Schemitsch EH. Systematic review of the treatment of periprosthetic distal femurfractures. J. Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:307–12. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Ricci WM, Streubel PN, Morshed S, Collinge CA, Nork SE, Gardner MJ. Risk factors for failure of locked plate fixation of distal femur fractures: an analysis of 335 cases. J Orthop Trauma. 2014 Feb;28(2):83–9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31829e6dd0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zlowodzki M, Bhandari M, Marek DJ, Cole PA, Kregor PJ. Operative treatment of acute distal femur fractures: systematic review of 2 comparative studies and 45 case series (1989 to 2005) J Orthop Trauma. 2006 May;20(5):366–71. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200605000-00013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Gautier E, Sommer C. Guidelines for the clinical application of the LCP. Injury. 2003 Nov;34(Suppl 2):B63–76. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2003.09.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bosetti M, Borrone A, Leigheb M, Shastri VP, Cannas M. Injectable Graft Substitute Active on Bone Tissue Regeneration. Tissue Eng Part A. 2017 Dec;23(23-24):1413–1422. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bosetti M, Leigheb M, Boccafoschi F, Brooks R, Cannas M. Regulation of osteoblast and osteoclast functions by FGF-6. J Cell Physiol. 2010 Nov;225(2):466–71. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bosetti M, Boccafoschi F, Leigheb M, Cannas M. Effect of different growth factors on human osteoblasts activities: a possible application in bone regeneration for tissue engineering. Biomol Eng. 2007 Dec;24(6):613–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kim K. Usefulness of bilateral plate fixation for periprosthetic distal femur fracture after total knee arthroplasty. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2020 Feb 6;68:43–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2020.01.043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ryan JA, Meyers KN, Dibenedetto P, Wright TM, Haas SB. Failure of the Patellar Tendon with the Patella Everted versus Noneverted in a Matched-Pair Cadaver Model. HSS J. 2010 Sep;6(2):134–7. doi: 10.1007/s11420-009-9149-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Frattini M, Vaienti E, Soncini G, Pogliacomi F. Tibial plateau fractures in elderly patients. Chir Organi Mov. 2009;93:109–14. doi: 10.1007/s12306-009-0038-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pogliacomi F, Verdano MA, Frattini M, Costantino C, Vaienti E, Soncini G. Combined arthroscopic and radioscopic management of tibial plateau fractures: Report of 18 clinical cases. Acta Biomed. 2005;76:107–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Vaienti E, Scita G, Ceccarelli F, Pogliacomi F. Understanding the human knee and its relationship to total knee replacement. Acta Biomed. 2017 Jun 7;88(2-S):6–16. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i2-S.6507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Leigheb M, Pogliacomi F, Bosetti M, et al. Postoperative blood salvage versus allogeneic blood transfusion in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a literature review. Acta Biomed. 2016;87(Suppl 1):6–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
