Skip to main content
Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis logoLink to Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis
. 2020 May 30;91(4-S):254–258. doi: 10.23750/abm.v91i4-S.9657

Subtrocantheric nonunion following fracture of an arthrodesed hip: a case report

Francesco Pogliacomi 1, Fabrizio Tacci 1,, Filippo Calderazzi 1, Martina Francesca Pedrini 2, Daniele Casalini 1, Enrico Vaienti 1, Francesco Ceccarelli 1
PMCID: PMC7944841  PMID: 32555106

Abstract

In recent years in the era of successful of total hip replacement, hip arthrodesis is rarely performed. The anatomy and biomechanics of an arthrodesed hip is altered, thus influencing the treatments strategies in case of fracture or nonunions. This case report describes the management and therapeutic solution for the treatment of subtrochanteric nonunion in a patient with hip arthrodesis. Satisfactory outcomes were finally obtained after a double surgical procedure. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Keywords: hip, arthrodesis, fracture, nonunion

Introduction

Total hip replacement (THR) has become the treatment of choice for most hip patologies and the indications for arthrodesis are few in selected cases (1,2). They include isolated arthritis of the hip in young patients engaged in manual work, or those with severe muscular deficits (3). Furthermore, this procedure is more often performed in the developing world, Furthermore, in young patients with septic arthritis. The most effective technique for obtaining a stable hip arthrodesis is a topic of debate. Several surgical procedures with varying rates of success have been described including the use of plates and screws, intramedullary nails and external fixators (4-9).

The increasing incidence regarding proximal femoral fractures in developed countries has been noticed. However, femoral fractures following hip arthrodesis are rare cases (1,10) that need special attention in their treatment strategy. This is related with the fact that conventional treatment options are difficult to apply as consequence of the concomitant altered anatomy and biomechanics. Therefore, nonunions in the atrhodesed hip may have an higher frequency, even if few reports about this topic are described in the literature (11-13).

In this case report Authors, we shall present a patient with a subtrochanteric nonunion following a fracture of the femur which occurred in a hip that had a previous arthrodesis.

Case presentation

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of Declaration of Helsinki. Patient signed informed consent about the treatment she was subjected and the processing of her personal data. M.C. a 71 years old female was admitted at the emergency department complaining of severe pain as a result of a torsional movement and a subsequent fall on his right hip, that underwent arthrodesis in the past.

Patient has a complex and not clear history. She was born with a hypometry of the lower right limb, and a homolateral hip dysplasia.

At the age of 9 she was submitted to arthrodesis. At the age of 19, she had surgery to lengthen his right femur. At the end of these treatments she was left with a hypometry of about 4 centimeters, but despite that she had a normal life.

Radiographs after trauma showed a subtrochanteric spiroid fracture of the right femur and the presence of screws in its distal fragment that derived from the previous intervention in a context of severe osteoporosis (figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Subtrochanteric right fracture in a previously arthrodesed hip

As several surgical options have been reported in literature, the choice of the proper surgical technique was not easy. Authors decided to perform open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with plate and screws (O’Nil plate 22,5 mm with 2 locking screws of 7 mm diameter, 2 locking screw of 4 mm diameter in the proximal fragment and 5 screws in the distal fragment; 1 of them is a standard screw) (figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Postoperative x-rays

Surgery was performed under general anesthesia.

After two months from surgery the patient was able to walk with crutches and control X-rays showed a slow bone healing process (figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Radiographs 2 months after surgery

After eight month M.C. was admitted again in the emergency ward complaining of severe pain as a result of another torsional movement and a subsequent fall. Radiographs showed a femoral nonunion and the breakage of the plate at the level of the previous fracture (figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Plate’s rupture 8 months after initial osteosynthesis with atrophic nonunion

The re-operation consisted in the removal of the broken plate and in a new fixation with a sliding hip screw associated with a cortical bone allograft and local injection of platelet rich plasma (PRP) (figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

X-rays following sliding hip screw fixation and cortical bone grafting and PRP injection.

Patient had a non weigth bearing period of 2 months. In the following weeks she gradually recovered and at final check (8 months after surgery) pain was absent and nonunion consolidated (figure 6).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

X-rays 8 months after second osteosynthesis with consolidation of the nonunion

Nowadays, she has returned to her daily activities with a quality of life equal to the preinjury condition.

Discussion

Fractures of the proximal femur are very common in the elderly population and treatment is usually surgical and performed as soon as possible. The particularity of a fracture around a preexisted coxofemoral arthrodesis derives from the fact that this type of lesion is rare, the experience of orthopaedic surgeon is low, and the literature is insufficient regarding this topic. Arthrodesis modifies the anatomy, biomechanics and biology of the femur and lower limb (14-16). Also, it can cause ipsilateral knee and lumbosacral spinal problems as well as atrophy of muscles around hip and thigh. A ”locked joint” determinates an altered distribution of forces and weight to the next joints, which have more easily early osteoarthritis, axial deviations and fractures (13).

The problem with deciding the correct surgical treatment and implants depends on all these factors.

In literature there are a lot of work recommending surgical treatment in order to avoid complications due to the long bed rest period (17-19).

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) and ORIF are the two possibilities of surgical treatment.

In this case report the first surgery was an ORIF. The conversion in total hip arthroplasty could be a strategy but the fracture was too much distal (20) and IMN was excluded because of technical difficulties related to patient positioning, fracture reduction and altered femoral anatomy (M.C. underwent both an arthrodesis and femoral elongation surgery) (21).

Authors managed to achieve a good reduction and sufficient stability. The patient resumed the load after two months from surgery. Clinical and X-ray follow-up showed a fracture that was healing slowly, but nonunion with plate’s rupture developed 8 months after fixation. Different hypotheses could explain this failure. One explanation can be found in the altered bone characteristics of the patient (elderly with a severe osteoporosis). Another may lie in the altered biomechanics of the lower limb. In normal conditions surgical treatment would probably have led to the healing of the fracture, but in patients who have undergone arthrodesis, the way in which the load forces are distributed is very different from the normal condition (10,14,15). Finally, the type of fracture may have favored the development of this complication. Subtrochanteric patterns are associated with a variable incidence of nonunions (rates of 4-13% for extramedullary devices and up to 10% in intramedullary fixation). The main causes of failed consolidation can be associated to the interruption of the medial cortex of the femur, to comminution of the fracture and consequent loss of bone substance, to an imperfect reduction, to an incorrect surgical treatment or to a particular biomechanical conditions of the hip, as present after arthodesis (13,22,23). Subtrochanteric nonunions are difficult to treat and the previous surgeries carried out worsens the local situation. Intramedullary and extramedullary devices also proved to be succesful in these cases (13).

In this specific case the presence of a broken plate and an atrophic nonunion indicated a new internal fixation associated with a cortical bone graft. Authors believe that the use of cortical grafts are essential in order to obtain healing as they guarantee a better biomachanic situation. Furthermore, they are sure that cortical grafts together with PRP determine a biological stimulus as demonstrated by progressive strut osteointegration and bone formation (24-28).

Conclusion

Subtrochanteric femoral nonunions in arthrodesed hip need special attention. Their treatment is difficult and controversial. Torsional stresses from the trunk and lower extremity require rigid fixation to minimize the risk of failure and is recommended a structural and biological supply in order to favor bone healing.

Conflict of interest:

Each author declares that he or she has no commercial associations (e.g. consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangement etc.) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article

References

  • 1.Manzotti A, Confalonieri N, Pullen C. Intertrochanteric fracture of an arthrodesed hip. J Bone Joint Surg B. 2007;89:390–92. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.89B3.18591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zeiler G, Schuh A. Arthrodesis of the hip and its conversion. Orthopaedics. 2004;33:939–56. doi: 10.1007/s00132-004-0697-1. in German. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barnhardt T, Stiehl JB. Hip fusion in young adults. Orthopaedics. 1996;19:303–6. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-19960401-06. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Schoenecker PL, Johson LO, Martin RA, Doyle P, Capelli AM. Intra-articular hip arthrodesis without subtrochanteric osteotomy in adolescents: technique and short-term follow-up. Am J Orthop. 1997;26:257–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Siebenrock KA, Gautier E, Matta JM, Mehne D, Ganz R. New technique for a hip arthrodesis using an anterior approach and a ventral plate. Orthopaedics. 1996;25:140–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bankes MJ, Simmons JM, Catterall A. Hip arthrodesis with the dynamic hip screw. J Pediatr Orthop. 2002;22:101–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Onji Y, Kurata Y, Kido H. A new method of hip fusion using an intramedullary nail. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1965;47-B:690–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Brien WW, Golz RJ, Kuschner SH, Brien EW, Wiss DA. Hip joint arthrodesis utilizing anterior compression plate fixation. J Arthroplasty. 1994;9:171–6. doi: 10.1016/0883-5403(94)90066-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Endo N, Takahashi HE, Toyama H, et al. Arthrodesis of the hip joint using an external fixator. J Orthop Sci. 1999;4:342–6. doi: 10.1007/s007760050114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shunsuke Asakawa, Takeo Mammoto, Atsushi Hirano. Proximal Femoral Fracture in Hip Arthrodesis Treated with Double Reconstruction Plates. Hindawi Case Reports in Orthopedics Volume. 2017 doi: 10.1155/2017/5246080. Article ID 5246080, 5 pages. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wagner M, Wagner H. Hip joint arthrodesis using the cobra plate. Indication, technique, outcome. Orthopade. 1996 Apr;25(2):129–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fuchs B, O’Connor MI, Kaufman KR, Padgett DJ, Sim FH. Iliofemoral arthrodesis and pseudarthrosis: a long-term functional outcome evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002 Apr;397:29–35. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200204000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pascarella R, Cerbasi S, Maresca A, Sangiovanni P, Fantasia R. Unusual presentation of recurrent subtrochanteric non-union in a patient with hip arthrodesis: A case report. Injury. 2018 Dec;49(Suppl 4):S2–S8. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Weber BG. Surgery of the Hip Joint. In: Tronzo R.G, editor. Hip Arthrodesis. Springer: New York, NY; 1987. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liechti R. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg; 1978. Biomechanics of Hip Arthrodesis and Internal Fixation: Kinetics and Elastometry. In: Hip Arthrodesis and Associated Problems. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liand B, Aspden RM. Material properties of bone from the femoral neck and calcar femoral of patients with osteoporosis or osteoarthritis. Osteoporosis International. 1997;7(5):450–6. doi: 10.1007/s001980050032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wulke AP, Mader K, Pennig D. Femoral neck fracture in an arthrodesed hip treated by a supracondylar intramedullary locked nail. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. 2004;18(2):116–8. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200402000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Murena L, Moretti A, Meo F, et al. Predictors of cut-out after cephalomedullary nail fixation of pertrochanteric fractures: a retrospective study of 813 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Mar;138(3):351–9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2863-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Canton G, Giraldi G, Dussi M, Ratti C, Murena L. Osteoporotic distal femur fractures in the elderly: peculiarities and treatment strategies. Acta Biomed. 2019 Dec 5;90(12-S):25–32. doi: 10.23750/abm.v90i12-S.8958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Jones LD, Hampton ER, Ansari EA. A treatment option for femoral neck fractures complicating hip arthrodesis: conversion to a constrained total hip replacement. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2007;17:203–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wong TC, Rikhraj IS. Femoral Shaft Fracture in a Hip Arthrodesis: Two Cases of Retrograde Interlocking Nailing. Singapore Med J. 2004;45(2):85. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Pogliacomi F, Pellegrini A, Tacci F, Pedrini MF, Costantino C, Pedrazzini A, Pedrazzi G, Lauretani F, Vaienti E, Ceccarelli F. Risks of subsequent contralateral fractures of the trochanteric region in elderly. Acta Biomed. 2016;87(3):275–281. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pellegrini A, Tacci F, Leigheb M, Costantino C, Pedrazzini A, Pedrazzi G, Vaienti E, Ceccarelli F, Pogliacomi F. Injuries of the trochanteric region: can analysis of radiographic indices help in prediction of recurrent osteoporotic hip fractures. Acta Biomed. 2017 Oct 18;88(4-S):43–9. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i4-S.6793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bernuzzi G, Petraglia, Pedrini MF, De Filippo M, Pogliacomi F, Verdano MA, Costantino C. Use of platelet-rich plasma in the care of sports injuries: our experience with ultrasound-guided injection. Blood Transfusion. 2014;12(Suppl 1):s229–34. doi: 10.2450/2013.0293-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Leigheb M, Pogliacomi F, Bosetti M, Boccafoschi F, Sabbatini M, Cannas M. Grassi. Postoperative blood salvage versus allogeneic blood transfusion in total knee and hip arthroplasty: a literature review. Acta Biomed. 2016 Apr 15;87(Suppl 1):6–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bosetti M, Leigheb M, Boccafoschi F, Brooks R, Cannas M. Regulation of osteoblast and osteoclast functions by FGF-6. J Cell Physiol. 2010 Nov;225(2):466–71. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bosetti M, Boccafoschi F, Leigheb M, Cannas M. Effect of different growth factors on human osteoblasts activities: a possible application in bone regeneration for tissue engineering. Biomol Eng. 2007 Dec;24(6):613–18. doi: 10.1016/j.bioeng.2007.08.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Follo F, Dejana DO, Belletti M, Bongiovanni N, Scarpa G, Pezzali P, Borsi S, Sanfilippo L, Lusetti N, Zaini L, Loritto P, Pogliacomi F, Pedrazzini A. Management and effect of platelet-rich plasma on wound healing: small reality of Oglio Po Hospital. Acta Biomed. 2017 Nov 30;88(5-S):66–70. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Acta Bio Medica : Atenei Parmensis are provided here courtesy of Mattioli 1885

RESOURCES