Abstract
Diabetic foot is challenging progressive disease which requires multisystemic control. Neuropathy, arteriopathy, and cellular responses should treated collaboratively. Despite all medical advances, diabetic foot can highly resulted with amputation and also re‐amputation can be required because of failed wound healing. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relation between blood parameters and amputation events. Diabetic 323 patients include to the study who referred to orthopaedic clinic for amputation. Amputation levels (amputation levels phalanx, metatarsal, lisfranc, syme, below knee, knee‐disarticulation, above‐knee amputation) and re‐amputations recorded and compared with routine blood parameters. Re‐amputation was observed at 69 patients. The significant difference detected between lower albumin, higher HbA1c, higher CRP levels (P < 0.05) in regards to gross amputation levels, and increased wound depth. Furthermore, lower albumin levels and higher levels of WBC, HbA1c, CRP, and Creatinine were detected in re‐amputation levels. Especially, HbA1c, CRP, and Creatinine levels were found as upper bound of reference line for re‐amputation. The statistically optimal HbA1c cutoff point for diabetes was ≥7.05%, with a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 59%. In according to our results, simple blood parameters can be useful for observing the progress of amputation in diabetic foot. Particularly, lower albumin, and higher HbA1c, CRP, and Creatinine levels detected as related with poor prognosis. Besides, screening of HbA1c level seems to be highly sensitive for detecting of re‐amputation possibility.
Keywords: amputation levels, blood parameters, diabetic foot, HbA1c, re‐amputation
1. INTRODUCTION
Diabetes is a worldwide problem that effects to multi‐organ systems and a component of the challenging syndromes such as metabolic syndrome. 1 Also neuronal system, renal system, arterial system (which implicates organ perfusion), retinal tissue, and wound healing are affected by hyperglycemia due to insulin. 1 , 2 Especially wound healing processes are affected in different steps and it leads to nonhealing ulcers which can be ended extremity loss. Some causes of nonhealing ulcerative wounds can be listed as colonisation of microorganisms, disintegration of injured epithelial barrier, disrupted immune defence, and functional abnormalities at connective and subcutaneous tissue. When combined of these underlying wound pathologies with neuropathy and impaired vascular flow, diabetic wounds are usually occurs at feet which is named as diabetic foot. 1 , 2 , 3
Cellular healing mechanisms has affected in diabetic patients. Toxic potential of higher blood glucose levels against fibroblasts and mitochondrial activity has already shown. 3 , 4 , 5 The increased blood glucose leads to producing of reactive oxygen species and break down oxidative balance. Antioxidant capacity is reduced and cellular senescence and apoptosis is triggered. 3 , 6 , 7 , 8 Thus, wounds are not healing regularly and that can be result with comorbidities such as diabetic foot. Nonhealed ulcers can be resulted with extremity loose, because of infection and insufficient oxygenation. 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 Moreover, impaired wound healing leads to re‐amputations in treated segments which was amputated formerly for treatment of gangrene and infection. In previous studies, investigators focused on the possible blood predictors for determining to the re‐amputation requirement. Serum albumin, haemoglobin (Hb), white blood cell count (WBC), netrophils, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C‐reactive protein (CRP) levels, and also glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) levels as predictor of glucose metabolism were studied in previous studies. 9 , 10 , 11 In according to obtained results of these previous studies, impaired blood glucose control and unregulated HbA1c was found as one of strong predictor for predicting to re‐amputation in diabetic patients. 9 , 10 , 11
Thus, in this study we aimed to investigate the relationship between routinely tested blood markers and re‐amputation rates in diabetic foot patients. Additionally, we targeted to sensitivity and specificity of these markers for predicting to determining re‐amputation probability in diabetic foot patients who had previous amputation history.
2. MATERIAL AND METHOD
Ethical approval was obtained from human ethical committee of University. The study protocols were designed in according to Helsinki Declaration and in adherence to local guidelines for good clinical practice. After determination of all steps, the diabetic foot patients who admitted to orthopaedic clinic for extremity amputation were recorded retrospectively between 2003 and 2018. Type 2 diabetes mellitus cases, diabetic foot patients with requirement of amputation, and patients available for past medical records at least 2 years were detected as inclusion criteria. Traumatic or nondiabetic amputations, patients with nonrecorded first amputation, and patients with other systemic diseases (malignancies, immune syndromes etc.) were excluded from the study. After included to the study the demographical findings, depth of wound, duration of diabetes were recorded.
2.1. Staging
The Wagner‐Meggitt classification system was used for diabetic foot classification. 12 Health status and comorbidity of patients were classified in according to ASA criteria. 13
The decision of amputation and/or re‐amputation was given from the diabetic foot committee in according to following criteria:
Clinical findings; gangrenous colour changes of skin, foul smell relates to anaerobic colonisation; necrosis; progressive unresponsive septic or toxic clinic in spite of medical treatment.
Diagnostic markers; Irreversible ischemic changes that was supported with ankle‐brachial index evaluation (lower than 0.8) and illustrated with vascular Doppler ultrasound.
After determining the appropriately perfused and noninfected area amputation levels were selected as: Digital (phalanx), Ray amputation, Trans‐metatarsal, Lisfranc, Syme's, Trans‐tibial (below knee), Knee disarticulation, and Trans‐femoral (above knee).
After operation every patients was taken into orthopaedic clinics and collaboratively followed up for blood glucose and blood parameters regulation, daily wound dressing, rehabilitation, and prosthesis application if it is necessary. Completely healed skin lesions and nonrecurrence at least following 6 months were accepted as total cure.
2.2. Blood parameters
Retrospectively routine blood parameters before application of amputation were controlled. Haemoglobin (Hb) [g/dL], white blood cell count (WBC) [K/μL], Albumin [g/dL], Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (%), C‐reactive protein (CRP) [mg/dL], and creatinine [mg/dL] levels were recorded.
2.3. Statistical analyse
All collected data were analysed by using SPSS software program (ver. 15.0, Chicago, Illinois). Continuous values expressed as mean ± SD and categorical values were expressed with percentages. The differences between groups were analysed with using Mann–Whitney U test. Optimal cut‐off value of significant parameters for predicting amputations/re‐amputations with expressing maximum sensitivity and specificity were detected by using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Accuracy of test was detected with using area under curve (AUC) values. The statistical significance was considered in according p values smaller that 0.05.
3. RESULTS
Totally 323 patients were included to the study. The mean age of patients was found as 64.01 ± 12.17. Gender distribution was detected as 94 (29%) female and 229 (71%) male. The involved side was found as 147 (45.5%) left, 168 (52%) right, 8 (2.5%) bilaterally. The amputation levels were listed at Table 1 and depth of wounds presented at Table 2.
TABLE 1.
Amputation levels of patients
| Level | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| Phalanx | 49 | 15.2 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 11.8 |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 13.9 |
| Syme's | 56 | 17.3 |
| Below knee | 81 | 25.1 |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 5.0 |
| Above knee | 38 | 11.8 |
| Total | 323 | 100.0 |
TABLE 2.
Depth of wound
| Depth of Wound | n | % |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 3.1 |
| 2 | 51 | 15.8 |
| 3 | 115 | 35.6 |
| 4 | 108 | 33.4 |
| 5 | 39 | 12.1 |
| Total | 323 | 100.0 |
The statistical difference was significant between amputation levels in regards of albumin, HbA1c, CRP, and creatinine levels (P < 0.001). Below knee and higher segment of amputation groups has lower albumin levels when compared with foot level amputation groups. Moreover, HbA1c (%) levels were detected as <7.0 in foot level amputation groups and >7.5 in below knee and higher segment of amputation groups (P < 0.001). Consecutively, CRP and creatinine levels were detected as ≤4.04 and ≤ 1.74 mg/dL in foot level amputation groups and ≥5.13 and ≥1.98 mg/dL in below knee and higher segment of amputation groups (P < 0.001). There is no significant differences between amputation levels in regards of haemoglobin and WBC levels. The distribution of amputation levels and laboratory markers listed at Table 3.
TABLE 3.
Laboratory findings for each amputation segments groups
| Blood Parameter | Amputation Segment | n | Mean ± Std. Deviation | 95% Confidence Interval for Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | Phalanx | 49 | 4.314 ± 0.5842 | 4.146 | 4.482 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 3.895 ± 0.7472 | 3.649 | 4.140 | |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 3.953 ± 0.6262 | 3.765 | 4.141 | |
| Syme's | 57 | 3.936 ± 0.7547 | 3.734 | 4.138 | |
| Below knee | 81 | 3.389 ± 0.7475 | 3.224 | 3.554 | |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 3.400 ± 0.6763 | 3.040 | 3.760 | |
| Above knee | 37 | 3.296 ± 0.6450 | 3.081 | 3.511 | |
| WBC (K/μL) | Phalanx | 49 | 9576.22 ± 4880.237 | 8174.45 | 10 977.99 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 11 430.79 ± 4406.613 | 9982.37 | 12 879.21 | |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 9832.22 ± 4078.011 | 8607.05 | 11 057.39 | |
| Syme's | 57 | 10 712.50 ± 3566.059 | 9757.50 | 11 667.50 | |
| Below knee | 81 | 10 620.42 ± 3357.602 | 9877.99 | 11 362.85 | |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 10 740.00 ± 3660.810 | 8789.29 | 12 690.71 | |
| Above knee | 37 | 10 209.74 ± 3917.484 | 8922.09 | 11 497.38 | |
| Hb (g/dL) | Phalanx | 49 | 13.047 ± 1.3516 | 12.659 | 13.435 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 17.195 ± 21.5291 | 10.118 | 24.271 | |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 14.200 ± 14.2459 | 9.920 | 18.480 | |
| Syme's | 57 | 12.368 ± 1.7608 | 11.896 | 12.839 | |
| Below knee | 81 | 12.662 ± 11.8918 | 10.032 | 15.291 | |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 11.194 ± 2.0728 | 10.089 | 12.298 | |
| Above knee | 37 | 11.415 ± 1.6981 | 10.857 | 11.973 | |
| HbA1c (%) | Phalanx | 49 | 6.676 ± 0.3370 | 6.579 | 6.772 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 7.105 ± 0.5959 | 6.909 | 7.301 | |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 7.044 ± 0.5101 | 6.891 | 7.198 | |
| Syme's | 57 | 7.005 ± 0.5658 | 6.854 | 7.157 | |
| Below knee | 81 | 7.574 ± 0.6294 | 7.434 | 7.714 | |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 7.833 ± 0.4716 | 7.572 | 8.094 | |
| Above knee | 37 | 7.665 ± 0.6826 | 7.427 | 7.903 | |
| CRP (mg/dL) | Phalanx | 49 | 4.2000 ± 3.87604 | 3.0216 | 5.3784 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 4.0441 ± 2.76287 | 3.0801 | 5.0081 | |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 3.8619 ± 3.40587 | 2.8006 | 4.9232 | |
| Syme's | 57 | 3.5942 ± 2.83579 | 2.8047 | 4.3837 | |
| Below knee | 81 | 5.1338 ± 3.87073 | 4.2552 | 6.0123 | |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 6.6733 ± 4.07492 | 4.4167 | 8.9299 | |
| Above knee | 37 | 6.6778 ± 4.70496 | 5.0858 | 8.2697 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | Phalanx | 49 | 1.1340 ± 0.38533 | 1.0140 | 1.2541 |
| Trans‐metatarsal | 38 | 1.5252 ± 0.85977 | 1.2098 | 1.8405 | |
| Lisfranc | 45 | 1.5992 ± 1.52205 | 1.1058 | 2.0926 | |
| Syme's | 57 | 1.7430 ± 1.52796 | 1.2944 | 2.1916 | |
| Below knee | 81 | 1.9836 ± 1.29853 | 1.6828 | 2.2845 | |
| Knee disarticulation | 16 | 2.2554 ± 1.52401 | 1.3344 | 3.1763 | |
| Above knee | 37 | 2.5612 ± 1.76023 | 1.9371 | 3.1854 | |
The was a significant difference between wound depth classes in regards of albumin, HbA1C, and CRP levels (P < 0.001). Increased depth of wound groups 4 , 5 has lower albumin levels when compared with lower depth wound (1, 2, and 3) groups. Moreover, HbA1c (%) levels were detected as <7.0 in lower depth wound groups and >7.5 in higher depth wound groups (P < 0.001). Consecutively, CRP and creatinine levels were detected as ≤4.40 and ≤1.52 mg/dL in lower depth wound groups and ≥4.91 and ≥2.22 mg/dL in in higher depth wound groups (P < 0.001). There is no significant differences between amputation levels in regards of haemoglobin and WBC levels. The distribution of wound depths and laboratory markers listed ant Table 4.
TABLE 4.
Laboratory findings for each wound depth groups
| Blood Parameters | Wound Depth | n | Mean ± Std. Deviation | 95% Confidence Interval for Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 1 | 10 | 4.260 ± 0.6204 | 3.816 | 4.704 |
| 2 | 51 | 4.250 ± 0.5881 | 4.083 | 4.417 | |
| 3 | 115 | 3.945 ± 0.6911 | 3.818 | 4.073 | |
| 4 | 108 | 3.433 ± 0.7035 | 3.299 | 3.568 | |
| 5 | 39 | 3.307 ± 0.8382 | 3.035 | 3.578 | |
| WBC (K/μL) | 1 | 10 | 10 054.03 ± 5876.307 | 5850.37 | 14 257.68 |
| 2 | 51 | 10 031.18 ± 4102.948 | 8877.20 | 11 185.15 | |
| 3 | 115 | 10 271.91 ± 4076.491 | 9518.87 | 11 024.96 | |
| 4 | 108 | 10 902.86 ± 3858.830 | 10 166.77 | 11 638.95 | |
| 5 | 39 | 10 131.03 ± 3178.728 | 9100.60 | 11 161.45 | |
| Hb (g/dL) | 1 | 10 | 13.490 ± 1.2270 | 12.612 | 14.368 |
| 2 | 51 | 12.878 ± 1.3296 | 12.504 | 13.252 | |
| 3 | 115 | 12.190 ± 1.6787 | 11.880 | 12.500 | |
| 4 | 108 | 14.046 ± 15.8954 | 11.014 | 17.078 | |
| 5 | 39 | 14.160 ± 17.0349 | 8.638 | 19.682 | |
| HbA1c (%) | 1 | 10 | 6.670 ± 0.1829 | 6.539 | 6.801 |
| 2 | 51 | 6.743 ± 0.4010 | 6.628 | 6.858 | |
| 3 | 115 | 6.982 ± 0.5262 | 6.885 | 7.080 | |
| 4 | 108 | 7.542 ± 0.5974 | 7.426 | 7.657 | |
| 5 | 39 | 7.839 ± 0.6549 | 7.624 | 8.055 | |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 1 | 10 | 4.3600 ± 5.19020 | .6472 | 8.0728 |
| 2 | 51 | 3.8277 ± 3.33360 | 2.8489 | 4.8064 | |
| 3 | 115 | 3.9398 ± 3.22132 | 3.3102 | 4.5694 | |
| 4 | 108 | 4.9772 ± 3.72290 | 4.2423 | 5.7122 | |
| 5 | 39 | 7.0564 ± 4.42230 | 5.6229 | 8.4900 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1 | 10 | 1.0340 ± 0.38687 | 0.7572 | 1.3108 |
| 2 | 51 | 1.2591 ± 0.48156 | 1.1127 | 1.4055 | |
| 3 | 115 | 1.5218 ± 1.39475 | 1.2361 | 1.8075 | |
| 4 | 108 | 2.2232 ± 1.49376 | 1.9206 | 2.5259 | |
| 5 | 39 | 2.2174 ± 1.40678 | 1.7342 | 2.7007 | |
There was a significant difference between American Society of Anaesthesiologists Classification (ASA) groups in regards of albumin, creatinine, HbA1C, and CRP levels (P < 0.001). Patients in higher ASA classes 4 , 5 has lower albumin levels when compared with lower ASA (1, 2, and 3) classes. Moreover, HbA1c (%) levels were detected as <7.24 in lower ASA classes and >7.86 in higher ASA classes (P < 0.001). Consecutively, CRP and creatinine levels were detected as ≤4.59 and ≤1.99 mg/dL in lower ASA classes and ≥4.92 and ≥2.49 mg/dL in higher ASA classes (P < 0.001). There is no significant differences between amputation levels in regards of haemoglobin and WBC levels. The distribution of ASA classes and laboratory markers listed ant Table 5.
TABLE 5.
The distribution of laboratory markers in regards of American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA)
| Blood Parameters | ASA Class | n | Mean ± Std. Deviation | 95% Confidence Interval for Mean | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||
| Albumin (g/dL) | 1 | 6 | 3.177 ± 0.8841 | 2.249 | 4.104 |
| 2 | 135 | 4.124 ± 0.6573 | 4.012 | 4.236 | |
| 3 | 113 | 3.633 ± 0.7213 | 3.498 | 3.768 | |
| 4 | 64 | 3.352 ± 0.7217 | 3.171 | 3.534 | |
| 5 | 5 | 2.625 ± 0.1500 | 2.386 | 2.864 | |
| WBC (K/μL) | 1 | 6 | 11 005.00 ± 2944.240 | 7915.21 | 14 094.79 |
| 2 | 135 | 10 266.98 ± 4291.934 | 9533.61 | 11 000.34 | |
| 3 | 113 | 10 404.28 ± 3755.047 | 9704.37 | 11 104.19 | |
| 4 | 64 | 10 675.87 ± 3795.428 | 9720.01 | 11 631.74 | |
| 5 | 5 | 11 900.00 ± 4874.423 | 4143.71 | 19 656.29 | |
| Hb (g/dL) | 1 | 6 | 12.687 ± 1.1897 | 11.438 | 13.935 |
| 2 | 135 | 12.476 ± 1.7372 | 12.179 | 12.773 | |
| 3 | 113 | 11.894 ± 1.7046 | 11.576 | 12.212 | |
| 4 | 64 | 17.506 ± 24.2447 | 11.400 | 23.612 | |
| 5 | 5 | 9.150 ± 1.5000 | 6.763 | 11.537 | |
| Total | 323 | 13.223 ± 11.0119 | 12.012 | 14.434 | |
| HbA1c (%) | 1 | 6 | 7.050 ± 0.2168 | 6.822 | 7.278 |
| 2 | 135 | 6.890 ± 0.5331 | 6.799 | 6.981 | |
| 3 | 113 | 7.246 ± 0.5758 | 7.138 | 7.353 | |
| 4 | 64 | 7.864 ± 0.5438 | 7.721 | 8.007 | |
| 5 | 5 | 8.350 ± 0.1000 | 8.191 | 8.509 | |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 1 | 6 | 3.5000 ± 1.00797 | 2.4422 | 4.5578 |
| 2 | 135 | 3.8254 ± 3.16579 | 3.2672 | 4.3836 | |
| 3 | 113 | 4.5909 ± 3.32026 | 3.9287 | 5.2531 | |
| 4 | 64 | 6.5871 ± 5.01965 | 5.3123 | 7.8618 | |
| 5 | 5 | 4.9250 ± 1.25000 | 2.9360 | 6.9140 | |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 1 | 6 | 1.3400 ± 0.56551 | 0.7465 | 1.9335 |
| 2 | 135 | 1.2484 ± 0.60655 | 1.1368 | 1.3599 | |
| 3 | 113 | 1.9936 ± 1.60359 | 1.6669 | 2.3202 | |
| 4 | 64 | 2.4945 ± 1.63402 | 2.0569 | 2.9321 | |
| 5 | 5 | 3.0000 ± 2.09523 | −2.2048 | 8.2048 | |
The 69 of the patients (21%) had re‐amputation. All laboratory parameters were found as statistically significant except Hb levels when compared re‐amputation required patients with stabile patients who does not required re‐amputation. The lower albumin levels and Higher WBC, HbA1C, CRP, and creatinine levels detected in re‐amputation group. Duration of diabetes was detected as 15.5 ± 11.6 years in re‐amputation group and 8.64 ± 8.1 years in stabile group (P < 0.001). Comparison of laboratory parameters in regards of re‐amputation was presented at Table 6.
TABLE 6.
Comparison of the re‐amputation and stabile groups
| Laboratory Parameter | Re‐amputation | Mean ± Std. Deviation | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Albumin (g/dL) | − | 3.896 ± 0.7339 | 0.001 |
| + | 3.230 ± 0.6939 | ||
| WBC (K/μL) | − | 10 024.13 ± 3942.656 | 0.001 |
| + | 11 882.46 ± 3725.957 | ||
| Hb (g/dL) | − | 12.599 ± 6.8135 | 0.250 |
| + | 15.402 ± 19.7597 | ||
| HbA1c (%) | − | 7.082 ± 0.6098 | 0.001 |
| + | 7.760 ± 0.5766 | ||
| CRP (mg/dL) | − | 4.2828 ± 3.53533 | 0.001 |
| + | 6.1090 ± 4.24402 | ||
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | − | 1.5702 ± 1.12674 | 0.001 |
| + | 2.5660 ± 1.80507 |
HbA1c, creatinine, and CRP levels were found as upper to reference line in ROC curve analyse (Figure 1). The cut‐off values were determined for predictor potential of these parameters for re‐amputation. The optimal cut‐off value of serum HbA1C levels was found as >7.05 for predicting re‐amputation with 86.7% sensitivity and 59.0% specificity (AUC: 0.785, 95% CI: 0.728–0.842). The optimal cut‐off value of serum CRP levels was found as >4.05 mg/dL for predicting re‐amputation with 61.2% sensitivity and 63.5% specificity (AUC: 0.627, 95% CI: 0.550–0.704). The optimal cut‐off value of serum creatinine levels was found as >1.60 mg/dL for predicting re‐amputation with 56.6% sensitivity and 69.0% specificity (AUC: 0.690, 95% CI: 0.609–0.770).
FIGURE 1.
The ROC curve analyses of blood parameters for prediction re‐amputation in diabetic foot
4. DISCUSSION
Our results indicate that there can be a strong relationship between higher HbA1C, (C‐reactive protein) CRP and creatinine levels, and higher‐level amputations in diabetic foot patients. Moreover, it seems to be that wound depth strongly associated that lower albumin, and higher HbA1C, CRP levels. Another quite remarkable finding of our study is related about prediction re‐amputation rates with increased value of serum HbA1C (with a cut‐off value of), CRP (with a cut‐off value of 4.05), and creatinine (with a cut‐off value of 1.6) levels. Especially, in according to our results HbA1C is the most sensitive predictor for re‐amputation in diabetic foot (optimal cut‐off value: 7.05 with 86% sensitivity and 59% specificity).
Previous studies also focused to investigate blood parameters for determining to prognosis of diabetes and also diabetic foot. Icer et al found that albumin, haemoglobin, WBC, neutrophils, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, HbA1c levels were related extremity amputation. 9 Also, they claimed that disease duration is related amputation because of impaired glucose metabolism. 9 In previous studies, lower albumin levels were associated with poor prognosis for many kind of circulatory problems. 14 , 15 In in vitro models reduced albumin levels were related with increased plasma protein glycation and also negatively correlated with increased HbA1c levels. 16 In another study lower albumin levels were associated with poorly controlled diabetes and also elevated HbA1c levels. 10 Also, low serum albumin levels were suggested as a risk factor for nonhealing diabetic foot ulcers and poor prognosis. 17 The other study about length of hospital stay in diabetic foot found that WBC count, CRP levels, and albumin levels were strongly correlated with long term hospital stay. 18 Furthermore, poor prognosis predictors decremental albumin levels and incremental HbA1c are strongly related with elevated plasma protein glycation that irreversibly impairs the wound healing physiology from cells‐to‐organs. Also wound healing mechanisms; as migration, proliferation, and transdifferentiation steps are affected due to the toxic effects of impaired blood glucose control. 5 Also, CRP as predictor for active inflammation was shown as a risk factor for amputation in diabetic foot ulcers. 11 Similarly, Volaco et al, suggested that higher CRP levels are strong predictor for major amputation for patients with ischemic diabetic foot lesions. 19 In another study increased levels of WBC and CRP was associated with poor prognosis and therapeutic failure of diabetic foot ulcers. 20 Additionally, in another study it was claimed that lower serum albumin levels show also poor prognosis and associated with increased amputation risk. 21 Likewise, HbA1c well‐known marker of detecting glycaemic control for last 2 to 3 months, have gained importance and have been comprehensively investigated in relation with diabetic foot ulcers, gangrene, and limb amputation. 22 There are several conflicting reports about amputation risk and HbA1c levels in literature. Nerone et al, detected that major amputations was not affected to elevated HbA1c levels. 23 Similarly, O'Connor et al found that there was not significant relation between HbA1c levels and risk of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and re‐intervention requirement in patients with critical limb ischemia. 24 Oppositely, it was shown that HbA1c levels was an independent risk factor for determining to the amputation level as below knee or above knee in Nather et al's research. 25 Similarly, we found that elevated HbA1C closely related with higher level of extremity amputation and independent predictor for re‐amputation in patients with diabetic foot. As supporting data of our findings, there was an evidence based results that determines 1% increase in HbA1c levels is associated 26% increases in the prevalence of PAD which can be directly related with higher risk of major limb loss. 26 Almost the similar with literature we found significantly lower albumin levels, and markedly higher WBC, HbA1c, CRP, and creatinine levels, and longer disease durations in re‐amputation patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Even, we found that HbA1C, CRP, and creatinine are sensible laboratory markers for amputation.
In conclusion the main point for amputation and/or re‐amputation for diabetic foot ulcers seems to be related with impaired glucose metabolism. The reflective blood parameters about this point such as albumin, WBC, CRP, and HbA1c can be useful for determining to the amputation risk. Especially, we suggest that higher HbA1c levels is highly sensitive for predicting to the amputation risk, in according to our results.
CONFLİCT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Gülcü A, Etli M, Karahan O, Aslan A. Analysis of routine blood markers for predicting amputation/re‐amputation risk in diabetic foot. Int Wound J. 2020;17:1996–2004. 10.1111/iwj.13491
REFERENCES
- 1. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson‐Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1719‐1724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. O'Loughlin A, McIntosh C, Dinneen SF, O'Brien T. Review paper: basic concepts to novel therapies: a review of the diabetic foot. Int J Low Extrem Wounds. 2010;9(2):90‐102. 10.1177/1534734610371600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Falanga V. Wound healing and its impairment in the diabetic foot. Lancet. 2005;366(9498):1736‐1743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Brem H, Tomic‐Canic M. Cellular and molecular basis of wound healing in diabetes. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(5):1219‐1222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Berlanga‐Acosta J, Schultz GS, López‐Mola E, Guillen‐Nieto G, García‐Siverio M, Herrera‐Martínez L. Glucose toxic effects on granulation tissue productive cells: the diabetics' impaired healing. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:256043. 10.1155/2013/256043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Tesfaye S, Selvarajah D. Advances in the epidemiology, pathogenesis and management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2012;28(Suppl 1):8‐14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Baltzis D, Eleftheriadou I, Veves A. Pathogenesis and treatment of impaired wound healing in diabetes mellitus: new insights. Adv Ther. 2014;31(8):817‐836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Ma L, Li P, Shi Z, Hou T, Chen X, Du J. A prospective, randomized, controlled study of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: effects on healing and oxidative stress of ulcer tissue in patients with a diabetic foot ulcer. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2013;59(3):18‐24. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Icer M, Durgun HM. Factors affecting amputations in patients with diabetic foot ulcer referring to the emergency units. Dicle Med J. 2017;44(1):91‐97. [Google Scholar]
- 10. Rodríguez‐Segade S, Rodríguez J, Mayan D, Camiña F. Plasma albumin concentration is a predictor of HbA1c among type 2 diabetic patients, independently of fasting plasma glucose and fructosamine. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(2):437‐439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Maragathamani AA. Correlation of CRP level with glycemic control in diabetic foot patients and its sequelae. Int Surg J. 2017;4(12):4006‐4009. [Google Scholar]
- 12. Jain AKC. A new classıfıcatıon of dıabetıc foot complıcatıons: a sımple and effectıve teachıng tool. J Diab Foot Compl. 2012;4:1‐5. [Google Scholar]
- 13. Doyle DJ, Garmon EH, Bansal P, Garmon EH. American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA Class) . StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2020. PMID: 28722969. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Karahan O, Yavuz C, Kankilic N, et al. Simple blood tests as predictive markers of disease severity and clinical condition in patients with venous insufficiency. Blood Coagul Fibrinolysis. 2016;27(6):684‐690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Karahan O, Acet H, Ertaş F, et al. The relationship between fibrinogen to albumin ratio and severity of coronary artery disease in patients with STEMI. Am J Emerg Med. 2016;34(6):1037‐1042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bhonsle HS, Korwar AM, Kote SS, et al. Low plasma albumin levels are associated with increased plasma protein glycation and HbA1c in diabetes. J Proteome Res. 2012;11(2):1391‐1396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Edakkepuram U, Sheeja PC, Gopi EV. A prospective cohort study of hypoalbuminemia as risk factor of wound healing in diabetic foot: a study from tertiary hospital in South India. Int Surg J. 2017;4(9):3141‐3145. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Choi SK, Kim CK, Jo DI, et al. Factors associated with a prolonged length of hospital stay in patients with diabetic foot: a single‐center retrospective study. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44(6):539‐544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Volaco A, Chantelau E, Richter B, Luther B. Outcome of critical foot ischaemia in longstanding diabetic patients: a retrospective cohort study in a specialised tertiary care centre. Vasa. 2004;33:36‐41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lipsky BA, Sheehan P, Armstrong DG, Tice AD, Polis AB, Abramson MA. Clinical predictors of treatment failure for diabetic foot infections: data from a prospective trial. Int Wound J. 2007;4:30‐38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Flores Rivera AR. Risk factors for amputation in diabetic patients: a case‐control study. Arch Med Res. 1998;29:179‐184. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. AlGoblan AS, Alrasheedi IM, Basheir OH, Haider KH. Prediction of diabetic foot ulcer healing in type 2 diabetic subjects using routine clinical and laboratory parameters. Res Rep Endocr Disord. 2016;6:11‐16. [Google Scholar]
- 23. Nerone VS, Springer KD, Woodruff DM, Atway SA. Reamputation after minor foot amputation in diabetic patients: risk factors leading to limb loss. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(2):184‐187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. O'Connor DJ, Gargiulo NJ III, Jang J. Hemoglobin A1c as a measure of disease severity and outcome in limb threatening ischemia. J Surg Res. 2012;174(1):29‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Nather A, Bee CS, Huak CY, et al. Epidemiology of diabetic foot problems and predictive factors for limb loss. J Diabetes Complications. 2008;22:77‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Selvin E, Marinopoulos S, Berkenblit G, et al. Meta‐analysis: glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:421‐431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]