Skip to main content
International Wound Journal logoLink to International Wound Journal
. 2015 May 27;13(4):493–499. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12464

Matrix metalloproteinases and risk stratification in patients undergoing surgical revascularisation for critical limb ischaemia

Giovanni De Caridi 1, Mafalda Massara 1, Francesco Spinelli 1, Antonio David 2, Sebastiano Gangemi 3, Francesco Fugetto 4, Raffaele Grande 5, Lucia Butrico 5, Roberta Stefanelli 6, Manuela Colosimo 7, Stefano de Franciscis 5,8,, Raffaele Serra 5,8,†,
PMCID: PMC7949845  PMID: 26012891

Abstract

Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) is the most advanced form of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and it is often associated with foot gangrene, which may lead to major amputation of lower limbs, and also with a higher risk of death due to fatal cardiovascular events. Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) seem to be involved in atherosclerosis, PAD and CLI. Aim of this study was to evaluate variations in MMP serum levels in patients affected by CLI, before and after lower limb surgical revascularisation through prosthetic or venous bypass. A total of 29 patients (7 females and 22 males, mean age 73·4 years, range 65–83 years) suffering from CLI and submitted to lower extremity bypass (LEB) in our Institution were recruited. Seven patients (group I) underwent LEB using synthetic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) graft material and 22 patients (group II) underwent LEB using autogenous veins. Moreover, 30 healthy age‐sex‐matched subjects were also enrolled as controls (group III). We documented significantly higher serum MMPs levels (P < 0·01) in patients with CLI (groups I and II) with respect to control group (group III). Finally, five patients with CLI (17·2%) showed poor outcomes (major amputations or death), and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test showed very high levels of MMP‐1 and MMP‐8. MMP serum levels seem to be able to predict the clinical outcomes of patients with CLI.

Keywords: Amputation, Foot gangrene, Matrix metalloproteinases, Peripheral artery disease, Revascularisation

Introduction

Peripheral artery disease (PAD), also known as peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD), is a common syndrome that affects a large proportion of the adult population and it is often associated with other comorbidities, such as dyslipidaemia, diabetes mellitus and hypertension. PAD may be manifested as intermittent claudication or critical limb ischaemia (CLI), which is the most advanced form and is associated with a higher risk of death and cardiovascular events: 20–25% of patients die at 1 year, and 25–30% undergo major amputation. 1, 2

The major cause for PAD is represented by atherosclerosis 3, and inflammation plays an important role in its development and progression 4. Moreover, elevated levels of C‐reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin‐23 (IL‐23) are associated with lower extremity PAD, as previously reported 5, 6, 7.

Atherosclerosis is an inflammatory process occurring in several distinct steps, many of which have been associated with alterations in the activity of matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) 8. MMPs are a family of zinc‐dependent endopeptidases with proteolytic activity against a wide range of extracellular proteins 9 that also contribute extensively to tissue remodelling by degrading extracellular matrix components in diverse vascular pathological processes 10, 11, 12, 13. Specifically, MMP dysregulation is associated with leukocyte infiltration, vascular smooth muscle cell (VSMC) migration and intra‐plaque matrix remodelling, each of which are key elements in atherosclerotic plaque formation 14, 15. Moreover, MMPs seem to be involved in intimal hyperplasia and constrictive remodelling, both responsible for re‐stenosis after endoluminal treatment of atherosclerotic lesions 16.

Recent clinical studies have shown an association between PAD and circulating levels of MMP‐2, MMP‐9, MMP‐8 and MMP‐10, compared with healthy controls 11, 12, 13, 17, 18. Moreover, an association between MMP‐10 serum levels and the severity and poor outcome in patients affected by PAD was reported 17.

Human data on MMP activity in PAD are limited. However, a linear correlation has been demonstrated between plasma MMP‐9 levels and the severity of ischaemia in patients with varying degrees of PAD 13.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the variations in serum levels of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐8, MMP‐9 and MMP‐10 in patients affected by CLI, before and after lower limb surgical revascularisation through venous or prosthetic bypass, and to relate these values with the 2‐year probability of survival and limb salvage.

Materials and methods

Selection criteria and patients

All patients with CLI, of both sex, aged >20 years, presenting to our institutions and with the indication for surgical revascularisation were recruited and were followed up for at least 24 months. The patients were classified according to the severity of the disease: lower limb rest pain or trophic lesions (Fontaine class III–IV).

Patients with chronic venous insufficiency, or arterial aneurysms, or infected lesions, or with neoplasia, or with generalised or localised inflammatory disease or with severe kidney disease were excluded from the study.

Patients with CLI were randomised to receive lower limb surgical revascularisation through autogenous venous or prosthetic bypass (using synthetic polytetrafluoroethylene – PTFE).

Patients enrolled in this study were followed up through clinical and ultrasonographic examination at 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months.

Serial blood samples in order to evaluate MMPs levels were collected three times: T0 (before 24 hours), T1 (after 24 hours) and T2 (after 6 months).

Limb salvage was defined as the absence of major amputation (if performed above the ankle) during the observation period and with the preservation of a functional lower limb.

Laboratory analysis

Serum samples were obtained using serum separator tube and allowing samples to dot for 30 minutes before centrifugation (15 minutes at approximately 1000 g); the serum aliquots were stored at −20°C until assay of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐8, MMP‐9 and MMP‐10 serum levels.

Blood count (red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets) was performed on whole blood (ABX Pentra Dx120; Horiba Ltd, Kyoto, Japan). Fibrinogen in the serum was measured using photometric reading (CA 7000; Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Inc., Deerfield, IL), and CRP was measured using photometric reading (Modular Analytics Systems D 2400; Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN). Serum creatinine was measured by photometric reading (Roche/HitachiModular Pre‐Analytics Plus; Roche Diagnostics).

Approval

This study was approved by the Investigational Review Board, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. Before the beginning of the study, all participants provided written informed consent. The protocol was properly registered at a public trials registry, www.clinicaltrials.gov (trial identifier NCT02388867).

Results

We evaluated serum MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐8, MMP‐9 and MMP‐10 levels and other biochemical values such as red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets, CRP, fibrinogen and creatinine in 29 patients (7 females and 22 males, mean age 73·4 years, range 65–83 years) suffering from lower extremity PAD and subjected to surgical bypass in our institution (Table 1). Patients with evidence of systemic sepsis, known neoplastic disease, or any established generalised inflammatory disease were excluded.

Table 1.

Demographics of the study population

Demographic and clinical data N (%)
Sex 22 M (75·9%), 7 F (24·1%)
Age (average) 73·4 (range 65–83)
Smoker history 14 (48·3%)
Former 9 (31%)
Current 5 (17·3%)
Diabetes mellitus 25 (86·2%)
Hypertension 19 (65·5%)
Dyslipidaemia 12 (41·4%)
Chronic renal failure on haemodialysis 7 (24·1%)
Myocardial dysfunction (16, 55·2%)
Medical treatment
Anti‐platelets 19 (65·5%)
Beta blockers 9 (31%)
Statins 12 (41·4%)
ACE inhibitors 8 (27·6%)
Calcium antagonists 12 (41·4%)
Insulin 18 (62%)
Anti‐diabetic drugs 7 (24·1%)
Fontaine's classification
Stage III 1 (3·4%)
Stage IV 28 (96·6%)
Surgical treatment
LEB using autogenous veins 22 (75·9%)
LEB using prosthetic material 7 (24·1%)

N, number; M, males; F, females; ACE, angiotensin‐converting‐eEnzyme; LEB, lower extremity bypass.

The patients were assessed by clinical and ultrasonography examination. At total of 28 patients were in stage IV and only one in stage III, according to the Fontaine's classification. The enrolled patients presented the following risk factors and comorbidities: diabetes mellitus (25, 86·2%), dyslipidaemia (12, 41·4%), smoking (14, 48·3%), hypertension (19, 65·5%), myocardial dysfunction (16, 55·2%) and chronic renal failure on haemodialysis (7, 24·1%). All patients underwent lower extremity bypass (LEB) surgery under locoregional anaesthesia.

Seven patients (group I) underwent LEB using synthetic PTFE graft material: the inflow vessel was the femoral artery in five and the iliac artery in two cases; the outflow vessel was represented by the popliteal artery in three and the anterior tibial artery in four patients.

Group II comprising 22 patients underwent LEB using autogenous veins (great saphenous vein in 20 cases, small saphenous vein in 1 patient, a composite bypass using great and small saphenous vein in 1 case): the inflow vessel was represented by the femoral artery in 18 cases and the popliteal artery in 4 patients; the outflow vessel was the anterior tibial artery in 6, the posterior tibial artery in 11 and the peroneal artery in 5 patients.

Serial blood samples were collected three times: T0 (before 24 hours), T1 (after 24 hours) and T2 (after 6 months).

Moreover, 30 healthy age‐sex‐matched subjects were also enrolled as control (group III).

We did not document any significant difference between the groups for blood count (red blood cells, white blood cells and platelets), fibrinogen and creatinine; for CRP levels, we found higher serum levels for groups I and II compared with the control group (group III) (P < 0·01), but there was no significant difference when groups I and II were compared (data not shown).

Significantly higher serum MMPs levels (P < 0·01) were documented in patients with CLI (groups I and II) with respect to the control group (group III) (Table 2).

Table 2.

Serum MMP levels (ng/ml) in enrolled patient, evaluated several times. T0 24 hours before surgery; T1 24 hours after surgery; T2 6 months after surgery. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation

MMP‐1 MMP‐2 MMP‐8 MMP‐9 MMP‐10
Group I
T0 4·9 ± 1·2 1325 ± 125 7·1 ± 2·6 135 ± 23 8·5 ± 2·3
T1 4·8 ± 1·3 1310 ± 112 7·1 ± 2·5 138 ± 25 8·4 ± 2·0
T2 4·5 ± 1·2 1250 ± 116 6·9 ± 2·6 137 ± 22 8·5 ± 2·1
Group II
T0 5·1 ± 2·2 1315 ± 145 7·2 ± 2·1 145 ± 31 8·3 ± 1·9
T1 5·1 ± 2·3 1300 ± 128 7·2 ± 2·3 141 ± 27 8·2 ± 2·1
T2 4·6 ± 2·2 1260 ± 121 6·9 ± 2·5 142 ± 25 8·3 ± 2·0
Group III
T0 3·2 ± 1·5 722 ± 185 1·7 ± 0·5 22 ± 9 2·9 ± 1·1
T1 3·4 ± 1·4 718 ± 179 1·5 ± 0·6 23 ± 11 2·9 ± 1·0
T2 3·1 ± 1·4 735 ± 198 1·6 ± 0·9 20 ± 8 2·7 ± 0·9

MMP, matrix metalloproteinases.

Finally, five patients with CLI (17·2%) showed poor outcomes, and enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) test showed very high levels of MMP‐1 and MMP‐8 (Table 3). Data are expressed as absolute values.

Table 3.

Characteristic of patients with poor outcomes. (MMPs levels are expressed in ng/ml)

Group of enrollment Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5
I I II II II
MMP‐1 T0 6·3 6·4 5·9 6·1 6·5
MMP‐8 T0 8·5 8·7 8·9 8·1 8·3
MMP‐1 T1 6·2 7·4 5·8 6·0 7·2
MMP‐8 T1 8·6 8·4 8·6 8·2 8·4
Outcomes (complications) Major amputation Died for heart stroke Major amputation Major amputation Died for heart stroke
Time point at which the complication occurred After 4 months After 5 months After 8 months After 15 months After 17 months

MMP, matrix metalloproteinases.

We did not record any significant correlation between serum MMPs levels and characteristic of the enrolled patients (data not shown).

The 2‐year overall survival rate was 93·1% (85·7% for group I and 95·4% for group II) and the 2‐year overall limb salvage rate was 89·6% (85·7% for group I and 90·9% for group II).

The major complications occurred between the 4th and the 17th month from the inclusion in the study, during the follow‐up period (Table 3).

Discussion

PAD is defined as a clinical disorder caused by stenosis or occlusion of the aorta or the arteries of the limbs 19. Atherosclerosis is by far the leading cause of peripheral arterial occlusion in patients aged 40 years or more; however, atheroembolic or thromboembolic disease, in situ thrombosis due to inherited thrombophilia, vasculitis, fibromuscular dysplasia, cystic adventitial disease, entrapment and trauma represent other possible aetiologies. The highest prevalence of PAD occurs in the seventh decade of life, reaching 15% of the persons in this age and, as for other cardiovascular diseases, in certain high‐risk populations (e.g. smokers, persons with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolaemia and hyperhomocysteinaemia) 20. Fewer than 50% of these patients are symptomatic, while many others present slow or impaired gait. The two most important manifestations of the PAOD are: (i) intermittent claudication, defined as a muscle discomfort presenting with pain, ache, cramp, numbness or fatigue, that occurs during exercise and is relieved by rest within 10 minutes 21 and (ii) CLI, defined as limb pain occurring at rest, or impending limb loss caused by a severe blood flow insufficiency of the affected extremity 22. CLI is chronic and complex in its nature and should not be confused with an acute occlusion of the distal arterial tree. With a long‐lasting (i.e. months to years) lack of blood supply to the legs, a number of macrovascular and microvascular changes that go further than the simple issue of supply versus demand that characterises PAD occur. Among these, vasomotor paralysis, oedema and endothelial changes of the arterial blood vessels represent the important phenomena that, ultimately, lead to rest pain and/or trophic lesions of the lower limbs 23. In such a scenario, CLI can be considered the end stage of PAD in which the patient complains chronic ischaemic rest pain, ulcers, or gangrene attributable to objectively proven arterial occlusive disease 21 and can be operatively defined as the more severe ends of the Fontaine classification of the PAOD (stage III–IV). However, CLI does not always follow such classification system and can occur even in asymptomatic patients 23.

PAD is a frequent cause of significant morbidity and mortality and can be considered as a marker of subclinical coronary heart disease and stroke, which in turn represent common causes of death in such patients 24, 25. The risk of cardiovascular events in these subjects is higher than that in those with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) and is increased by threefold to sixfold when compared with individuals without PAD 25, 26. Although they represent approximately only the 1% of those with PAD, patients with CLI have an even greater risk of ischaemic issues than those with PAD alone 22. The overall mortality is 25% at 1 year, 50% at 5 years and 70% at 10 years 1, 27, 28, while 25–30% undergo major amputation of the affected limbs 2.

In view of the above, an early diagnosis and optimal management are mandatory in CLI. However, whether treating CLI by a surgical or medical way is still a matter of debate: no defined guidelines have been released because of the complex comorbidities (which vary from patient to patient) and the different risks for each procedure 23. In any case, one should be focused on pain relief, improvement of healing rates of ischaemic ulcers, limb salvage, functional outcomes, Quality of Life (QOL) levels and improvement of patient's survival probability. With such aims, predictive indices and risk‐stratification of patients with CLI can guide the physician in choosing and tailoring the treatment of PAD. This is even more valiant when newer and ancillary approaches to PAD such as angiosome‐targeted revascularisation 29, 30, extreme distal bypass 31, gene therapy 32, 33, vacuum‐assisted closure (VAC) therapy 34, 35, spinal cord stimulation 36, 37 and prostaglandin E1 infusions 38, 39 are considered.

To this date, clinical and biochemical markers have been used as predictors of the functional and prognostic outcomes for patients undergoing intervention for CLI; among these, the most commonly reported are (i) certain intrinsic patient comorbidities at the time of presentation such as diabetes mellitus, CAD, foot gangrene and urgent need of operation40; (ii) preoperative and postoperative living situation and ambulatory status 41, 42; (iii) chronic kidney insufficiency in dialysis regimen, presence of non‐healing ulcer or gangrene, individuals aged ≥75 years, a low haematocrit (≤30%), a positive history of advanced CAD 43 and (iv) gender, mode of admission, age on admission, urea, sodium, potassium, haemoglobin, white cell count, creatinine, urea/creatinine 44.

As previously seen, the large majority of aetiological events that result in PAD are somehow linked to inflammation 4. Because of this, inflammatory mediators such as IL‐6, tumour necrosis factor‐α (TNF‐α), neopterin, CRP and IL‐23 represent other independent prognostic factors eligible for clinical practice 5, 6, 7, 45, 46.

MMPs are a family of zinc‐dependent endopeptidases with proteolytic activity against a wide range of extracellular proteins 9 that contribute extensively to normal physiology (e.g. cell migration, wound healing and tissue resorption). They also seem to play an important role in a number of pathological conditions, both vascular 10, 11, 12, 13, 47, 48, 49, 50 and non‐vascular in origin 47, 49, 50, 51. Among the former, alterations in MMP activity have been detected in the course of the atherosclerotic lesion formation 8, this being speculated to be linked to plaque rupture 52, leukocyte infiltration, VSMC migration into the sub‐intimal space and intra‐plaque matrix remodelling 14, 15. In addition, MMPs seem to be involved in intimal hyperplasia and constrictive remodelling, both responsible for re‐stenosis after endoluminal treatment of atherosclerotic lesions 16. Finally, even if no selective drug has yet been developed, MMP inhibition using sulodexide 53, 54, cilostazol 55, 56, minocycline 57 and doxycycline 58 showed to be a useful aid for ulcer prevention and healing in both venous and arterial disease.

With this evidence, an intimate relationship between MMPs and PAD can be presumed; however, human data on MMP activity in CLI is limited. Yet, previous published studies have linked the high levels of both MMP‐1 and MMP‐8 to a greater risk of endurance of chronic venous and mixed ulcers 59, 60. Tayebjee et al. demonstrated a linear correlation between plasma MMP‐9 levels and the severity of ischaemia in patients with varying degrees of PAD 13. Recent clinical studies showed an association between PAD and circulating levels of MMP‐2, MMP‐9, MMP‐8 and MMP‐10, compared with healthy controls 11, 12, 17, 18. A recent study showed the association between MMP‐10 serum levels and the severity and poor outcome in patients affected by PAD 18.

In the present study, we have evaluated the variations in the serum levels of MMP‐1, MMP‐2, MMP‐8, MMP‐9 and MMP‐10 in patients affected by CLI, before and after lower limb surgical revascularisation through venous or prosthetic bypass. Our aim was to firmly relate these values with the 2‐year probability of survival and limb salvage of such patients. We documented higher levels of MMP‐1 and MMP‐8 in patients with poor outcomes in both groups. Interestingly, MMP‐1 and MMP‐8 are collagenases that are able to initiate cleavage of triple helical collagens I, II and III 61. As type I and III collagens represent the major components of the fibrous cap of atherosclerotic plaques 62, 63, we could also speculate a pathogenetic role of these MMPs in such poor outcomes.

In our study, MMP‐1 and MMP‐8 serum levels were related to all the major complications that occurred in CLI patients during the follow‐up period.

The limitation in our study was the relatively small number of patients enrolled. Nevertheless, such sharp results strongly suggest examining in depth the role of MMPs as prognostic factors in the treatment of CLI in terms of probability of survival, limb salvage, QOL and functional outcomes. Furthermore, encouraged by the preliminary results, we also hope that in the future, more selective MMP inhibitors will be introduced in the clinical practice of ulcer healing.

In conclusion, MMP serum levels seem to be effective in predicting poor outcomes in patients with CLI identifying in such way a subcategory of critical patients that need to be monitored more strictly in order to avoid important or fatal complications.

Acknowledgement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. This work received no funding.

References

  • 1. Escobar C, Blanes I, Ruiz A, Vinuesa D, Montero M, Rodríguez M, Barbera G, Manzano L. Prevalence and clinical profile and management of peripheral arterial disease in elderly patients with diabetes. Eur J Intern Med 2011;22:275–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Falluji N, Mukherjee D. Critical and acute limb ischemia: an overview. Angiology 2014;65:137–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. American Association for Vascular Surgery; Society for Vascular Surgery; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society of Interventional Radiology; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter‐Society Consensus; Vascular Disease Foundation. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): a collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease): endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter‐Society Consensus; and Vascular Disease Foundation. Circulation 2006;113:463–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Signorelli SS, Fiore V, Malaponte G. Inflammation and peripheral arterial disease: the value of circulating biomarkers [review]. Int J Mol Med 2014;33:777–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Ridker PM, Cushman M, Stampfer MJ, Tracy RP, Hennekens CH. Plasma concentration of C‐reactive protein and risk of developing peripheral vascular disease. Circulation 1998;97:425–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. David A, Saitta S, De Caridi G, Benedetto F, Massara M, Risitano DC, Venuti FS, Spinelli F, Gangemi S. Interleukin‐23 serum levels in patients affected by peripheral arterial disease. Clin Biochem 2012;45:275–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. David A, Saitta S, De Caridi G, David T, Noto A, Minciullo PL, Spinelli F, Gangemi S. Different serum levels of interleukin‐23 in patients affected by peripheral arterial disease. Vascular 2014;22:471–2. DOI: 10.1177/1708538113498590 Epub 2013 Sep 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Plutzky J. The vascular biology of atherosclerosis. Am J Med 2003;115(8A Suppl):55S–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rodriguez JA, Orbe J, Martinez de Lizarrondo S, Calvayrac O, Rodriguez C, Martinez‐Gonzalez J, Paramo JA. Metalloproteinases and atherothrombosis: MMP‐10 mediates vascular remodeling promoted by inflammatory stimuli. Front Biosci 2008;13:2916–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Back M, Ketelhuth DF, Agewall S. Matrix metalloproteinases in atherothrombosis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2010;52:410–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Pradhan‐Palikhe P, Vikatmaa P, Lajunen T, Palikhe A, Lepantalo M, Tervahartiala T, Salo T, Saikku P, Leinonen M, Pussinen PJ, Sorsa T. Elevated MMP‐8 and decreased myeloperoxidase concentrations associate significantly with the risk for peripheral atherosclerosis disease and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Scand J Immunol 2010;72:150–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Signorelli SS, Malaponte G, Libra M, Di Pino L, Celotta G, Bevelacqua V, Petrina M, Nicotra GS, Indelicato M, Navolanic PM, Pennisi G, Mazzarino MC. Plasma levels and zymographic activities of matrix metalloproteinases 2 and 9 in type II diabetics with peripheral arterial disease. Vasc Med 2005;10:1–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Tayebjee MH, Tan KT, MacFadyen RJ, Lip GY. Abnormal circulating levels of metalloprotease 9 and its tissue inhibitor 1 in angiographically proven peripheral arterial disease: relationship to disease severity. J Intern Med 2005;257:110–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Lijnen HR. Metalloproteinases in development and progression of vascular disease. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2003;33:275–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Galis ZS, Khatri JJ. Matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling and atherogenesis: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Circ Res 2002;90:251–62. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kuzuya M, Iguchi A. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in vascular remodeling. J Atheroscler Thromb 2003;10:275–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Signorelli SS, Anzaldi M, Fiore V, Simili M, Puccia G, Libra M, Malaponte G, Neri S. Patients with unrecognized peripheral arterial disease (PAD) assessed by ankle‐brachial index (ABI) present a defined profile of proinflammatory markers compared to healthy subjects. Cytokine 2012;59:294–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Martinez‐Aguilar E, Gomez‐Rodriguez V, Orbe J, Rodriguez JA, Fernandez‐Alonso L, Roncal C, Paramo JA. Matrix metalloproteinase 10 is associated with disease severity and mortality in patients with peripheral arterial disease. J Vasc Surg 2015;61:428–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Dolan NC, Liu K, Criqui MH, Greenland P, Guralnik JM, Chan C, Schneider JR, Mandapat AL, Martin G, McDermott MM. Peripheral artery disease, diabetes, and reduced lower extremity functioning. Diabetes Care 2002;25:113–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2000. Circulation 2004;110:738–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FGR, on behalf of the TASC II Working Group . Inter‐society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007;33:S1–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Hirsch AT, Haskal ZJ, Hertzer NR, Bakal CW, Creager MA, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Murphy WR, Olin JW, Puschett JB, Rosenfield KA, Sacks D, Stanley JC, Taylor LM Jr, White CJ, White J, White RA, Antman EM, Smith SC Jr, Adams CD, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, Nishimura R, Ornato JP, Page RL, Riegel B. American Association for Vascular Surgery; Society for Vascular Surgery; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology; Society of Interventional Radiology; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines Writing Committee to Develop Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease; American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; Society for Vascular Nursing; TransAtlantic Inter‐Society Consensus; Vascular Disease Foundation. ACC/AHA 2005 Practice guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease (lower extremity, renal, mesenteric, and abdominal aortic): Executive summary—A collaborative report from the American Association for Vascular Surgery/Society for Vascular Surgery, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology, Society of Interventional Radiology, and the ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing committee to develop guidelines for the management of patients with peripheral arterial disease). Circulation 2006;113:1474–547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Varu VN, Hogg ME, Kibbe MR. Critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2010;51:230–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Criqui MH, Denenberg JO, Langer RD, Fronek A. The epidemiology of peripheral arterial disease: importance of identifying the population at risk. Vasc Med 1997;2:221–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Criqui MH, Langer RD, Fronek A, Feigelson HS, Klauber MR, McCann TJ, Browner D. Mortality over a period of 10 years in patients with peripheral arterial disease. N Engl J Med 1992;326:381–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Caro J, Migliaccio‐Walle K, Ishak KJ, Proskorovsky I. The morbidity and mortality following a diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease: long‐term follow‐up of a large database. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 2005;5:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nehler MR, Peyton BD. Is revascularization and limb salvage always the treatment for critical limb ischemia? J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2004;45:177–84. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Watelet J, Soury P, Menard JF, Plissonnier D, Peillon C, Lestrat JP, Testart J. Femoropopliteal bypass: in situ or reversed vein grafts?: Ten‐year results of a randomized prospective study. Ann Vasc Surg 1997;11:510–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Serra R, Grande R, Scarcello E, Buffone G, de Franciscis S. Angiosome‐targeted revascularisation in diabetic foot ulcers. Int Wound J 2013. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12162[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Spillerova K, Biancari F, Leppäniemi A, Albäck A, Söderström M, Venermo M. Differential impact of bypass surgery and angioplasty on angiosome‐targeted infrapopliteal revascularization. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2015;49:412–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. De Caridi G, Massara M, Villari S, Martelli E, Spinelli F, Grande R, Butrico L, de Franciscis S, Serra R. Extreme distal bypass to improve wound healing in Buerger's disease. Int Wound J 2014. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12241[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Robertson KE, McDonald RA, Oldroyd KG, Nicklin SA, Baker AH. Prevention of coronary in‐stent restenosis and vein graft failure: does vascular gene therapy have a role? Pharmacol Ther 2012;136:23–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Serra R, de Franciscis S. Gene Therapy to prevent thrombosis and anastomotic restenosis after vascular bypass procedures. Thromb Res 2014;134:215–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. De Caridi G, Massara M, Greco M, Pipitò N, Spinelli F, Grande R, Butrico L, de Franciscis S, Serra R. VAC therapy to promote wound healing after surgical revascularisation for critical lower limb ischaemia. Int Wound J 2014. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12301[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Lejay A, Creton O, Thaveau F, Bajcz C, Stephan D, Kretz JG, Chakfé N. Current clinical applications of vacuum‐assisted closure (VAC) in vascular surgery. J Mal Vasc 2008;33:196–201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. De Caridi G, Massara M, David A, Giardina M, La Spada M, Stilo F, Spinelli F, Grande R, Butrico L, de Franciscis S, Serra R. Spinal cord stimulation to achieve wound healing in a primary lower limb critical ischaemia referral centre. Int Wound J 2014. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12272[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. De Caridi G, Massara M, Benedetto F, Tripodi P, Spinelli F, David A, Grande R, Butrico L, Serra R, de Franciscis S. Adjuvant spinal cord stimulation improves wound healing of peripheral tissue loss due to steal syndrome of the hand: clinical challenge treating a difficult case. Int Wound J 2014. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12233[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. De Caridi G, Massara M, Stilo F, Spinelli F, Grande R, Butrico L, de Franciscis S, Serra R. Effectiveness of prostaglandin E1 in patients with mixed arterial and venous ulcers of lower limbs. Int Wound J 2014. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Cassar K. Peripheral arterial disease. BMJ Clin Evid 2011;2011:0211. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Biancari F, Salenius JP, Heikkinen M, Luther M, Ylonen K, Lepantalo M. Risk‐scoring method for prediction of 30‐day postoperative outcome after infrainguinal surgical revascularization for critical lower‐limb ischemia: a Finnvasc registry study. World J Surg 2007;31:217–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. AbouZamzam AM, Lee RW, Moneta GL, Taylor LM, Porter JM. Functional outcome after infrainguinal bypass for limb salvage. J Vasc Surg 1997;25:287–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Taylor SM, Kalbaugh CA, Blackhurst DW, Cass AL, Trent EA, Langan EM, Youkey JR. Determinants of functional outcome after revascularization for critical limb ischemia: an analysis of 1000 consecutive vascular interventions. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:747–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Schanzer A, Mega J, Meadows M, Samson RH, Bandyk DF, Conte MS. Risk stratification in critical limb ischemia: derivation and validation of a model to predict amputation‐free survival using multicenter surgical outcomes data. J Vasc Surg 2008;48:1464–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Tang TY, Prytherch DR, Walsh SR, Athanassoglou V, Seppi V, Sadat U, Lees TA, Varty K, Boyle JR, Association with the Audit and Research Committee of the Vascular Society of Great Britain & Ireland . The development of a VBHOM‐based outcome model for lower limb amputation performed for critical ischaemia. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009;37:62–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Ridker PM, Stampfer MJ, Rifai N. Novel risk factors for systemic atherosclerosis: a comparison of C‐reactive protein, fibrinogen, homocysteine, lipoprotein(a), and standard cholesterol screening as predictors of peripheral arterial disease. JAMA 2001;285:2481–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Barani J, Nilsson JA, Mattiasson I, Lindblad B, Gottsäter A. Inflammatory mediators are associated with 1‐year mortality in critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg 2005;42:75–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. de Franciscis S, Mastroroberto P, Gallelli L, Buffone G, Montemurro R, Serra R. Increased plasma levels of metalloproteinase‐9 and neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin in a rare case of multiple artery aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg 2013;27:1185.e5–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Serra R, Grande R, Montemurro E, Butrico L, Caliò FG, Mastrangelo D, Scarcello E, Gallelli L, Buffone G, de Franciscis S. The role of matrix metalloproteinases and neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin in central and peripheral arterial aneurysms. Surgery 2015;157:155–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Serra R, Buffone G, Costanzo G, Montemurro R, Scarcello E, Stillitano DM, Damiano R, de Franciscis S. Altered metalloproteinase‐9 expression as the least common denominator between varicocele, inguinal hernia and chronic venous disorders. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:705–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Serra R, Buffone G, Falcone D, Molinari V, Scaramuzzino M, Gallelli L, de Franciscis S. Chronic venous leg ulcers are associated with high levels of metalloproteinases‐9 and neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin. Wound Repair Regen 2013;21:395–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Serra R, Grande R, Montemurro E, Butrico L, Caliò FG, Mastrangelo D, Scarcello E, Gallelli L, Buffone G, de Franciscis S. The role of matrix metalloproteinases and neutrophil gelatinase‐associated ;ipocalin in central and peripheral arterial aneurysms. Surgery 2015;157:155–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Loftus IM, Naylor AR, Goodall S, Crowther M, Jones L, Bell PR, Thompson MM. Increased matrix metalloproteinase‐9 activity in unstable carotid plaques. A potential role in acute plaque disruption. Stroke 2000;31:40–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Serra R, Gallelli L, Conti A, De Caridi G, Massara M, Spinelli F, Buffone G, Caliò FG, Amato B, Ceglia S, Spaziano G, Scaramuzzino L, Ferrarese AG, Grande R, de Franciscis S. The effects of sulodexide on both clinical and molecular parameters in patients with mixed arterial and venous ulcers of lower limbs. Drug Des Devel Ther 2014;8:519–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Hoppensteadt DA, Fareed J. Pharmacological profile of sulodexide. Int Angiol 2014;33:229–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. de Franciscis S, Gallelli L, Battaglia L, Molinari V, Montemurro R, Stillitano DM, Buffone G, Serra R. Cilostazol prevents foot ulcers in diabetic patients with peripheral vascular disease. Int Wound J 2013. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12085[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Sheu JJ, Lin PY, Sung PH, Chen YC, Leu S, Chen YL, Tsai TH, Chai HT, Chua S, Chang HW, Chung SY, Chen CH, Ko SF, Yip HK. Levels and values of lipoprotein‐associated phospholipase A2, galectin‐3, RhoA/ROCK, and endothelial progenitor cells in critical limb ischemia: pharmaco‐therapeutic role of cilostazol and clopidogrel combination therapy. J Transl Med 2014;12:101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Serra R, Grande R, Buffone G, Gallelli L, De Franciscis S. The effects of minocycline on extracellular matrix in patients with chronic venous leg ulcers. Acta Phlebologica 2013;14:99–107. [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Serra R, Gallelli L, Buffone G, Molinari V, Stillitano DM, Palmieri C, de Franciscis S. Doxycycline speeds up healing of chronic venous ulcers. Int Wound J 2015;12:179–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Serra R, Grande R, Buffone G, Molinari V, Perri P, Perri A, Amato B, Colosimo M, de Franciscis S. Extracellular matrix assessment of infected chronic venous leg ulcers: role of metalloproteinases and inflammatory cytokines. Int Wound J 2014. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12225[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Amato B, Coretti G, Compagna R, Amato M, Buffone G, Gigliotti D, Grande R, Serra R, de Franciscis S. Role of matrix metalloproteinases in non‐healing venous ulcers. Int Wound J 2013. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12181[Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Billinghurst RC, Dahlberg L, Ionescu M, Reiner A, Bourne R, Rorabeck C, Mitchell P, Hambor J, Diekmann O, Tschesche H, Chen J, Van Wart H, Poole AR. Enhanced cleavage of type II collagen by collagenases in osteoarthritic articular cartilage. J Clin Invest 1997;99:1534–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Shah PK, Galis ZS. Matrix metalloproteinase hypothesis of plaque rupture: players keep piling up but questions remain. Circulation 2001;104:1878–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Molloy KJ, Thompson MM, Jones JL, Schwalbe EC, Bell PR, Naylor AR, Loftus IM. Unstable carotid plaques exhibit raised matrix metalloproteinase‐8 activity. Circulation 2004;110:337–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Wound Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES