Abstract
It has been reported that negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is effective in the treatment of contaminated wounds. We hypothesised that systemically administered antibiotics migrate to wound site effectively by NPWT, which provides the antibacterial effect. We measured and compared the concentrations of vancomycin in the exudate and blood serum. Eight patients with skin ulcers or skin defect wounds who were treated with NPWT and were administered an intravenous drip of vancomycin were enrolled in this study. The wound surfaces were muscle, muscle fascia or adipose tissue. We administered vancomycin intravenously to NPWT patients (1–3 g/day). The exudate was obtained using 500 ml V.A.C. ATS ® canisters without gel. Three days later, the concentrations of vancomycin were measured. The mean concentration of vancomycin in the exudate from NPWT was 67% of the serum vancomycin concentration. We found that concentrations of vancomycin in NPWT exudates are higher than the previously reported concentrations in soft tissue without NPWT. The proactive use of NPWT might be considered in cases of suspected wound contamination when a systemic antibiotic is administered.
Keywords: Exudate, Infection, Negative pressure wound therapy, Vancomycin
Introduction
The use of negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for infected wounds is not universally accepted. However, there are reports that NPWT is effective in the treatment of open sternal wounds and open fractures 1. It can be demonstrated that if there is wound contamination, NPWT has an effect on local infection control and therapy. We consider this effect of NPWT to be obtained through several mechanisms. It has been reported that NPWT resulted in a significant decrease in the number of bacteria 2, 3. We hypothesise that antibiotics that are administered systemically migrate to the wound site effectively by NPWT, resulting a reduction in the number of bacteria. Pharmacokinetically, it is thought that the local concentration of antibiotics works directly to create the antibacterial effect.
To measure the concentration of antibiotics that perfuse to the wound during NPWT, we focused on the exudate that is collected in the canister of the NPWT system. The concentration of vancomycin hydrochloride in the exudate is theoretically equivalent to that in the interstitial fluid surrounding the wound tissue. In addition, we measured the concentration of serum vancomycin (which is frequently measured in clinical practice).
Frequently, methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection of the wound becomes complicated. Healing takes a long time. Vancomycin is the drug of first choice for MRSA. However, it is well known that it has a low penetrance to skin and fat tissue and its effect on wound colonisation and infection is sometimes limited.
We measured and compared the concentrations of vancomycin in the exudates and blood serum to assess the effect of NPWT on the migration of vancomycin from the blood stream to the wound site by comparing its value with previously reported values. Our hypothesis is that there is some effect of NPWT on the vancomycin concentration of the exudates.
Patients
Eight patients with skin ulcers or skin defect wounds (five men and three women; aged 24–83 years) who were treated with NPWT were enrolled in this study after approval of our institutional review board. The wound surfaces were muscle, muscle fascia or adipose tissue. There were no clinical signs of significant infection in any of the wounds.
There was one patient with diabetes and one with hypertension. There were two lower leg ulcer wounds (the wound surface was adipose tissue), two skin/subdermal tumour‐removal wounds (adipose tissue), two fasciotomy wounds secondary to compartment syndrome surgery (muscle and muscle fascia), one third‐degree burn (adipose tissue) and one post‐debridement surgical site infection (adipose tissue). For this last patient, the wound was previously opened and drained and the infection controlled.
Methods
First, we used the Cockcroft–Gault formula‐derived creatinine clearance to determine the dosage of vancomycin, which was then administered intravenously to NPWT patients.
For NPWT, we used the V.A.C. ATS® system (KCI KK, Tokyo, Japan). The exudates were obtained using the 500 ml V.A.C. ATS® canisters without gel. The canisters had a hole at the top that vacuumed the air; a needle was placed through this hole for sampling the exudates. Three layers of protective film were applied when using the V.A.C. ATS® system to prevent water vapour condensation resulting from air leakage.
After the third day, the concentrations of vancomycin were measured. The vancomycin concentration of the exudates was measured along with the trough level prior to vancomycin administration. The fluorescence polarisation immunoassay method was used to measure the concentration of vancomycin. After the exudates were sampled, impurities were precipitated using a centrifuge. The supernatant was measured using the above process.
The verified stability of vancomycin was high. Vancomycin was dissolved in several solutions and stored at 24°C for 24 hours; the final titre of vancomycin was 97–100% of the initial titre. There was essentially no degradation of vancomycin 4.
The pharmacokinetic parameters of vancomycin were calculated by VCM‐TDM Microsoft‐Excel Version2.03 (Practical Pharmacological Program, designed by Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan).
Area under the blood concentration time curve (AUC) was determined using the following equation for AUC 5:
We calculated the average serum vancomycin concentration from the AUC as follows:
Haematocrit and haemoglobin levels in the exudates were measured. The haematocrit was 2–5% and haemoglobin was 0·8–1·5 g/dl. We calculated the theoretical concentration of vancomycin in exudate using the following corrective formula 6:
where CE is the theoretical concentration of vancomycin in exudate, CD the actual concentration of vancomycin in exudate, CB the concentration of vancomycin in serum, HD hematocrit in exudate and HB hematocrit in blood. There was no effect of mixing with blood.
Results
The detailed patient information is provided in Table 1. The mean age was 44·3 years old. The mean daily dosage of vancomycin was 2375 mg. The serum trough concentrations of vancomycin, the concentrations of vancomycin in the exudates and vancomycin clearance values (CLvanco) are shown in Table 2.
Table 1.
Patient background and daily vancomycin dosage
| Age | Sex | Location | Daily vancomycin dosage (mg) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Skin ulcer | 72 | F | Lower leg | 500 × 2 |
| 2 | Skin ulcer | 41 | M | Lower leg | 1500 × 2 |
| 3 | Subdermal tumour removal | 49 | M | Hip | 1500 × 2 |
| 4 | Skin tumour removal | 28 | F | Neck | 1500 × 2 |
| 5 | Post‐fasciotomy due to compartment syndrome | 24 | M | Lower leg | 1000–1500 × 2 |
| 6 | Post‐fasciotomy due to compartment syndrome | 24 | M | Lower leg | 1500 × 2 |
| 7 | Third‐degree burn | 68 | M | Arm | 500 × 2 |
| 8 | Surgical site infection | 48 | F | Chest wall | 1250 × 2 |
| Mean | 44·3 | 2375 |
Table 2.
Serum and exudate vancomycin concentrations and percentages
| Trough serum vancomycin concentration (µg/ml) | Exudate vancomycin concentration (µg/ml) | Vancomycin clearance(l/hour) | Average serum vancomycin concentration (µg/ml)a | Exudate vancomycin/average serum vancomycin (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12·28 | 14·42 | 1·168 | 27·73 | 52 |
| 2 | 17·6 | 14·1 | 4·852 | 27·28 | 52 |
| 3 | 12·46 | 16·11 | 5·216 | 25 | 64 |
| 4 | 73·2 | 71·4 | 0·954 | 115·86 | 62 |
| 5 | 9·5 | 13 | 6·539 | 14·94 | 87 |
| 6 | 6·5 | 17·4 | 7·469 | 16·74 | 104 |
| 7 | 20·1 | 13·5 | 2·338 | 26·73 | 51 |
| 8 | 11·1 | 14 | 4·797 | 21·71 | 64 |
| Mean 67% |
We calculated the average serum vancomycin concentration using the formula: The average serum vancomycin concentration (μg/ml) = {Dose (mg)/CLvanco(l/h)}/h × 1000.
Table 2 also shows the percentages of vancomycin concentration that perfused to the exudate and the average serum vancomycin concentrations. The mean percentage of perfusion was 67%.
Discussion
We investigated the effects of NPWT on the concentration of vancomycin hydrochloride in wound exudate during the therapy. Results showed that the mean vancomycin concentration in exudate from NPWT is 67% of the serum vancomycin concentration. This is higher than the previously reported migration rate of vancomycin into the interstitial fluid without NPWT 7. These reported concentrations of vancomycin in the interstitial fluid were calculated by the microdialysis method. A flexible microdialysis probe with a membrane was inserted under the interstitium of soft tissue and perfused with Ringer's solution by means of a microinfusion pump. Microdialysis samples for determination of vancomycin concentration were collected and measured. It is thought that the measurement of the local tissue concentration of vancomycin by this method is very accurate. This report 7 concluded that the vancomycin interstitial fluid concentration was 10% of the serum concentration in diabetics and 30% of the serum concentration in non‐diabetics.
NPWT has been used in various clinical situations, including trauma such as soft tissue injuries, open fractures and burns; it is also effective for surgical procedures such as cutaneous fixation of split‐thickness skin grafts 1.
There have been various reports regarding the mechanism of the effects exerted on the wound 8, 9. These mechanisms include eliminating excess exudate 10, promoting granulation tissue proliferation 11, decreasing the bacterial count 2, 3, contraction of the wound edge 10 and maintaining a moist environment 10.
We would like to discuss two effects that are related to the mechanisms involved in this investigation. First, elimination of excess exudate is achieved and cutaneous blood flow is also promoted. The exudate is removed from the surface of the wound, and due to the negative pressure gradient applied to the interstitial fluid, interstitial oedema is reduced and the blood flow surrounding the wound is improved. We have found no reports regarding the quantitative improvement in interstitial oedema. Wackenfors et al. reported that blood flow to muscle tissue 2–3 cm away and the skin tissue 2·5–3·5 cm away from the wound margin was increased by 1·5‐fold to 2‐fold 12.
Next, the effects that reduce the bacterial count are present. NPWT has also been demonstrated to be effective against bacteria at the wound surface. A reduction in the bacterial count was observed in the wound tissue culture and results showed that the effects against gram‐negative bacilli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were greater than for S. aureus 2, 3. Clinically, NPWT was used to treat vascular graft infection, and investigators described swabs from the wound surface as being negative 13.
NPWT is indicated for a wide variety of diseases and injuries, but there are also instances where it is contraindicated. Contraindications include cases where necrotic tissue remains in the wound surface, cases where there is haemorrhage, massive infections and cases where there is a fistula to visceral organs 9. There are reports of toxic shock syndrome onset when NPWT was used to treat infected wounds 14, so care should be taken when using NPWT where there is already contamination.
However, there are some cases in which NPWT is recommended once the infection has subsided to a certain extent. In particular, NPWT was effective in the case of mediastinitis or sternal osteomyelitis after debridement was performed and the infection was controlled 1. Furthermore, Lui et al. reported that in cases of Gustilo IIIb open fractures, the rate of infection was significantly reduced within 7 days of NPWT, when bone fixation and debridement were conducted immediately 15. Based on these reports, NPWT is considered useful in preventing infection even if there is bacterial contamination, but not when critical colonisation occurs.
We then considered whether NPWT resulted in more than a mere decrease in the bacterial count and whether systemic administration of antibiotics via the NPWT device contributes to local effects on the wound. In terms of pharmacokinetics, systemically administered antibiotics migrate to the tissues and exercise their effects. Antibiotic effects are dependent on the drug concentration and it is believed that the effects increase when the local concentration increases. We considered whether the amount of antibiotic that migrates to the wound site is increased through NPWT.
Exudate that is obtained from NPWT has approximately the same electrolyte concentrations as that of interstitial fluid 16; thus, exudate and interstitial fluid can be said to be equivalent theoretically. In other words, we can conclude that if the antibiotic concentration in the exudate rises, then the interstitial fluid concentration increases. We decided to compare the antibiotic concentration in the exudate and the plasma concentration in this study.
Furthermore, we measured the concentration of vancomycin, an antibiotic that is commonly used in clinical practice. Vancomycin is a glycopeptide antibiotic and is effective against MRSA infection and critical colonisation, which are becoming clinically problematic. Vancomycin was also selected because the fluorescent antibody assay method can be used with this antibiotic. Vancomycin is known to have a low migration rate into some tissues, with reported migration rates of 86–88% into pleural fluid 17, 41% into the lungs 18, 23·8% into bone tissue and 50·8% into bone marrow blood 19. Migration rates into adipose tissue and interstitial fluid are 21·6% 20 and 30% 7, respectively, with a low migration rate into cutaneous tissue. When these reports of migration rates are compared to our results, the vancomycin concentrations in NPWT exudates are high; this indicates that the migration rate is increased by NPWT.
To the best of our knowledge, the reports that investigated the antibiotic concentration in the exudate of human skin defects and surgical wounds involved penicillins 21, 22, cephalosporins 23, 24, 25 and carbapenems 26, and in terms of anti‐MRSA drugs, the concentration of linezolid was only measured in blisters 27. We did not find any reports that investigated the migration of vancomycin into wound exudates. Apparently, there have been no reports that have measured the antibiotic concentration in exudates from NPWT except for this report.
The mechanisms by which NPWT affects the rate of antibiotic migration can be inferred from the following two points. The first is the effect of filtration under reduced pressure. Normally, substances with a molecular weight of less than 5000 are able to move freely through the capillaries. Vancomycin (molecular weight: 1485·71), which is not bound to plasma proteins, is thought to migrate into the interstitial fluid via passive diffusion along its concentration gradient. The vancomycin protein binding rate is said to be 34% 28 and approximately half of the unbound vancomycin migrates into the interstitium. Negative pressure applied to the interstitial surface results in filtration at reduced pressure. The interstitial fluid is consequently drawn from within the blood vessels, and the low‐molecular‐weight substances are drawn from the capillaries. Filtration itself is not specific to vancomycin but may increase its migration speed.
The second effect of NPWT is the previously mentioned action of increasing perfusion in the surrounding skin. Because of increased perfusion, the amount of vancomycin that is transported to the capillaries increases and this may increase the total amount of vancomycin that migrates into the interstitial tissues. When we investigated the differences in the wound surfaces in this study, some small differences in the migration rate occurred depending on whether there was muscle, muscle fascia or adipose tissue at the wound surface (Figure 1). This suggests that the differences in perfusion between the original tissues may be reflected in the results.
Figure 1.

Vancomycin concentrations in wound exudates are higher than the previously reported migration rate of vancomycin into the interstitial fluid.
: wound surface is muscle or muscle fascia.
, wound surface is adipose tissue.
, previously reported vancomycin migration rate into the interstitial fluid.
Based on the above results, NPWT and systemic administration of antibiotics, at least regarding vancomycin, might be effective in the treatment of wound contamination. However, limitations of this study included the fact that sample size was small and that changes in the migration rate may have occurred according to the wound type and the use of different antibiotics. Further study using a larger sample of cases is required.
In conclusion, we found that vancomycin concentrations in wound exudates from NPWT are higher than the previously reported concentrations without NPWT. The proactive use of NPWT might be considered in cases of suspected wound contamination when a systemic antibiotic is administered.
Acknowledgements
We are indebted to the Department of International Medical Communications of Tokyo Medical University for the editorial review of the English manuscript. All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest associated with this study.
Ida Y, Matsumura H, Onishi M, Ono S, Imai R, Watanabe K. Measurement of vancomycin hydrochloride concentration in the exudate from wounds receiving negative pressure wound therapy: a pilot study.
References
- 1. Krug E, Berg L, Lee C, Hudson D, Birke‐Sorensen H, Deoorter M, Dunn R, Jeffery S, Duteille F, Bruhin A, Caravaggi C, Chariker M, Dowsett C, Ferreira F, Francos Martinez JM, Grudzien G, Ichioka S, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M, Rome P, Vig S, Runkel N, Martin R, Smith J. Evidence‐based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in traumatic wounds and reconstructive surgery: steps towards an international consensus. Injury 2011;42:S1–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Moues CM, Vos MC, Van den bemd GCM, Stijnen T, Hovius SER. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum‐assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:11–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Lalliss SJ, Stinner DJ, Waterman SM, Branstetter JB, Masini BD, Wenke JC. Negative pressure wound therapy reduces Pseudomonas wound contamination more than Staphylococcus aureus . J Orthop Trauma 2010;24:598–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Internal materials from Shionogi & Co., Ltd., Manufacturer of vancomycin. URL http://www.tryx‐ph.co.jp/image/VCM%81@IF%203%20200705.pdf [accessed on 10 February 2014]
- 5. Brunton LL, Lazo JS, Parker KL. Goodman and Gilman's the pharmacological basis of therapeutics, 11th edn. McGraw‐Hill: New York, 2006:13. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kamidono S, Fujii A, Harada M, Arakawa S, Umezu K, Ishigami J. Studies on antibiotics distribution in post‐operative cavity. Acta Urologica Japonica 1985;31:533–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Skhirtladze K, Hutschala D, Fleck T, Thalhammer F, Ehrlich M, Vukovich T, Muller M, Tschernko EM. Impaired target site penetration of vancomycin in diabetic patients following cardiac surgery. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2006;50:1372–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Orgill DP, Sumpio EK, Lee RC, Attinger CE, Gurtner GC, Ehrlich HP. The mechanisms of action of vacuum assisted closure: more to learn. Surgery 2009;146:40–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Banwell PE, Musgrave M. Topical negative pressure therapy: mechanisms and indications. Int Wound J 2004;1:95–106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Banwell PE. Topical negative pressure therapy in wound care. J Wound Care 1999;8:79–84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pinocy J, Albes JM, Wicke C, Ruck P, Ziemer G. Treatment of periprosthetic soft tissue infection of the groin following vascular surgical procedures by means of a polyvinyl alcohol‐vacuum sponge system. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:104–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Fabian TS, Kaufman HS, Lett ED, Thomas JB, Rawl DK, Lewis PL, Summitt JB, Merryman JI, Schaeffer TD, Sargent LA, Burns RP. The evaluation of subatmospheric pressure and hyperbaric oxygen in ischemic full‐thickness wound healing. Am Surg 2000;66:1136–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Wackenfors A, Sjogren J, Gustafsson R, Algotsson L, Ingemansson R, Malmsjo M. Effects of vacuum‐assisted closure therapy on inguinal wound edge microvascular blood flow. Wound Repair Regen 2004;12:600–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Gwan‐Nulla DN, Casal RS. Toxic shock syndrome associated with the use of the vacuum‐assisted closure device. Ann Plast Surg 2001;47:552–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Liu DSH, Sofiadellis F, Ashton M, MacGill K, Webb A. Early soft tissue coverage and negative pressure wound therapy optimizes patient outcomes in lower limb trauma. Injury 2012;43:772–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Wade C, Wolf SE, Salinas R, Jones JA, Rivera R, Hourigan L, Baskin T, Linfoot J, Mann EA, Chung K, Dubick M. Loss of protein, immunoglobulins, and electrolytes in exudates from negative pressure wound therapy. Nutr Clin Pract 2010;25:510–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Byl B, Jacobs F, Wallemacq F, Rossi C, Francquen P, Cappello M, Leal T, Thys J. Vancomycin penetration of uninfected pleural fluid exudate after continuous or intermittent infusion. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2003;47:2015–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Cruciani M, Gatti G, Lazzarini L, Furlan G, Broccali G, Malena M, Franchini C, Concia E. Penetration of vancomycin into human lung tissue. J Antimicrob Chemother 1996;38:865–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kurata K. Bone, marrow blood and joint fluid concentration of Vancomycin. Antibiot Chemother 1993;9:138–43. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Payne CJ, Thomson AH, Stearns AT, Watson DG, Zhang T, Kingsmore DB, Byrne DS, Binning AS. Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of vancomycin continuous infusion as prophylaxis for vascular surgery. J Antimicrob Chemother 2011;66:2624–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Wittle RR, Adam D, Klein HE. Therapeutic results and tissue concentrations of temocillin in surgical patients. Drugs 1985;29(Suppl 5):221–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ingvarsson L, Kamme C, Lundgren K. Concentration of penicillin V in serum and middle ear exudate during treatment of acute otitis media. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1980;89(3 pt 2):275–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gwland HNF, Jamieson CW. Antibiotic concentration in the exudate of venous ulcers: the prediction of ulcer healing rate. Br J Surg 1983;70:532–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Sugiyama H, Hatano T, Takayanagi K, Aoyama H, Goto T. Transfer of cefoperazone into human skin fluid. Clin Ther 1985;7:607–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mizuta E, Kaneko Y, Nishindai H, Yoshimoto M, Nakanishi Y, Hashimoto I, Sawada Y, Nakamura T, Mikami J. Pharmacokinetics of cefotiam in the exudate from wounds of patients with breast cancer operated upon for radical mastectomy. Jpn J Antibiot 1986;39:109–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Wise R, Logan M, Cooper M, Ashby JP, Andrews JM. Meropenem pharmacokinetics and penetration into an inflammatory exudate. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990;34:1515–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. MacGowan AP. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamics profile of linezolid in healthy volunteers and patients with Gram‐positive infections. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;51(Suppl 2):ii17–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nakashima M. Phase studies on vancomycin hydrochloride for injection. Chemotherapy 1992;40:210–24. [Google Scholar]
