Skip to main content
International Wound Journal logoLink to International Wound Journal
. 2013 Jun 7;12(3):313–316. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12109

Role of fibronectin in normal wound healing

Ellie A Lenselink 1,
PMCID: PMC7950333  PMID: 23742140

Abstract

Fibronectin is an adhesive molecule that plays a crucial role in wound healing, particularly in extracellular matrix (ECM) formation and also in reepithelialisation. Fibronectin plays many different roles in the wound healing process because of the presence of specific function domains and binding sites in its structure. Fibronectin interacts with different cell types, cytokines and the ECM. The main role of fibronectin is ECM formation. First, plasma fibronectin forms a provisional fibrin–fibronectin matrix, which will later be replaced by the mature ECM‐containing tissue fibronectin.

Keywords: Adhesive molecule, Extracellular matrix, Fibronectin

Introduction

Wound healing is a complex and dynamic process, which involves interaction between different cells and molecules 1. Normal wound healing consists of different stages: haemostasis, inflammation, proliferation and remodelling 2. An adhesive molecule known as fibronectin plays different roles in different stages of wound healing, with the main role being cellular adhesion 3, 4. Other roles are mediation of cell growth and cell migration 2, 5, 6.

In the last two decades of the 20th century, there has been extensive research into the structure of fibronectin and the role of fibronectin in the extracellular matrix (ECM) in wound healing and tissue repair or formation 3, 7, 8. A number of recently published studies are available that examine the construction of ECM fibronectin in wound repair in vitro 9, 10, 11. This article reviews the role of fibronectin in ECM formation, especially in the proliferative phase, both in wound repair and tissue repair of other connective tissue.

Function and structure of fibronectin

Fibronectin is a large glycoprotein that is found in all kinds of tissues and is essential in many different cell–matrix interactions 12, 13. All fibronectin molecules consist of the same basic functional domains. Although encoded by single genes, the sequence is subdivided into approximately 50 exons 3, exons being a piece of DNA in the gene 14. The fibronectin gene is composed of three general types of homologous repeating units or modules, termed types I, II and III. In the gene, each repeating module of the type I or II homology unit is encoded by a separate exon. In contrast, a type III requires the contribution of two exons each. These modular repeating units are used as building blocks and are organised into larger structural domains with distinct functions. Type I modules are used to bind fibrin, heparin or collagen. The type II modules are found only in the collagen‐binding domain and the type III modules are used in the domain that binds to cells. Type III also has the possibility of alternative splicing. When the exons from genes are built in a different manner during RNA splicing it is called alternative splicing, which will result in different sequence patterns, leading to different variables that give different expressions of fibronectin 3, 13, 14. Because of the specific function domains and binding sites, fibronectin interacts with different cell types, cytokines and the ECM 15. Fibronectin binds to other cell surfaces by integrins. An integrin links the fibronectin outside the cell to the actin filaments inside the cell. When parts of fibronectin molecules are bound together, they form a fibril 3, 13.

There are two forms of fibronectin: plasma fibronectin, which is synthesised in a soluble form by hepatocytes into the blood plasma 4, 16, and cellular or tissue fibronectin, which is produced by different cells such as fibroblasts, endothelial cells and keratinocytes (Hynes and Yamada 1982, cited in Ref. 17). Plasma fibronectin is more important in the early phase of wound healing where it binds to platelets and fibrin, resulting in providing increased strength to the fibrin clot 4. Moreover, fibronectin in this clot is important for various platelet functions such as adhesion, migration and aggregation. Later in wound healing, endothelial cells and fibroblasts enter the wound bed and deposit cellular fibronectin that is important for granulation tissue formation 4. These findings are in concordance with the findings of Clark 7 who demonstrated the role of fibronectin under the migrating epithelium in reepithelialisation. However, later work by Moretti et al. 18 suggested that the major part of tissue fibronectin is plasma‐derived.

Role of fibronectin in ECM formation in the proliferative phase of wound healing

Fibronectin also plays a role in the early phases of wound healing. The first step in haemostasis after wounding is the release of platelets from the blood flow in order to form a platelet plug. Interplatelet binding occurs through integrins via fibrinogen 19. The fibrin clot is further stabilised by factor XIII, where this factor binds fibrins to fibronectin, to form a fibrin–fibronectin clot 20. Fibronectin has been detected in areas of active bleeding in humans following fatal trauma 21. In the inflammatory phase, fibronectin is able to opsonise ECM debris. Beyond that, it activates macrophages so that they can phagocytise the debris 15.

Early research identified the distribution of fibronectin during wound healing by creating rectangular wounds in pigs 22. Biopsies from the animals demonstrated that fibronectin was part of the fibrin clot observed on the surface of mononuclear cells (i.e. macrophages), and that collagen fibrils were covered with fibronectin. From these data, Grinnell et al. suggested that fibronectin formed the substratum for cell migration and that fibronectin was a major component during wound healing.

Furthermore, Clark et al. suggested that fibronectin—when cross‐linked with fibrin—might play a role in epidermal cell migration in vivo 23. Donaldson and Mahan 24 also demonstrated that fibronectin and fibrinogen are mediators for epidermal keratinocytes to migrate through the provisional wound bed, showing the importance of fibronectin in wound healing. However Guo et al. (25) suggest that keratinocytes need to be activated by integrins before migration occurs. A later study by Donaldson et al. 26 attempted to localise the domain of fibronectin that mediates this migration. They demonstrated that new epidermal cell migration is restricted to a domain in the middle third of the gene. The results contrasted with the earlier study by Donaldson and Mahan 24, whose results suggested that cell migration was shared equally by all regions of the molecule. A subsequent study by Igisu 27 demonstrated the role of plasma fibronectin in reepithelialisation in wound healing in vivo. Labelled plasma fibronectin was detected in the wound just 3 hours after wounding, and more remarkably accumulation was visible after 48 hours. Furthermore, they demonstrated migration of new epithelial cells and precipitation of fibrous fibronectin in the upper papillary dermis 3 days after wounding. Based on these findings, Igisu suggested that plasma fibronectin plays an important role in migration and adhesion of epithelial cells in the reepithelialisation process.

Keratinocytes are capable of upregulating the fibronectin‐binding integrins 28. Later on, this was also demonstrated by Ongenae and coworkers 29 by examining the levels of fibronectin mRNA and α5β1 integrin. They demonstrated that the level of fibronectin mRNA in acute wounds was similar to that found in normal skin. Integrin α5 was heavily induced throughout the epidermis of acute wounds. Together, these findings suggest that fibronectin in the provisional matrix enhances epithelialisation mediated by integrins.

Greiling and Clark 30 investigated that fibroblast migration from the periwound collagenous matrix into the wound bed was fibronectin dependent in vitro. They demonstrated that transmigration into the fibrin clot without fibronectin was decreased by about 80%, suggesting that fibroblast migration was fibronectin dependent in the fibrin clot provisional matrix 30. Furthermore, they also demonstrated that fibroblast migration was plasminogen dependent and that fibronectin had to be present in both the collagenous and the provisional matrix to facilitate the transmigration process. Clark 7 suggests that fibronectin is also synthesised by fibroblasts, which is one of the key cells involved in the proliferation phase, the main function being to synthesise the ECM 2.

Along with fibronectin, the ECM is made up of collagens, proteoglycans, laminin and tenascin 31. The synthesis of fibronectin and fibrogenesis is promoted by two important cytokines, namely, the transforming growth factor β and connective tissue growth factor 4. Singh et al. 32 identify that ECM formation requires the creation of fibrils via fibronectin molecules. Subsequently, the fibronectin matrix deposition in wounds stimulates collagen deposition and also contributes to wound contraction 8. Using integrin α5β1, fibronectin is able to bind to other cells to further stabilise the ECM 15. Moreover, fibronectin binds glycosaminoglycans such as heparin sulphate and hyaluronic acid, the promoters of wound healing 7.

Corbett et al. 33 compared fibronectin alone and fibronectin within a fibrin matrix in vitro and demonstrated that there was a different cytoskeletal response from attached cells 33. They also demonstrated that cell morphology and behaviour were dependent on the molecular context of the ECM. On the basis of these findings, they suggested that substrate composition may play a role in regulating cell shape and size. A decade later, Midwood et al. 34 investigated different mechanisms for modulating cell responses to fibronectin matrix in vitro. They studied the complex interplay between adhesion, adhesion modulation and matrix turnover during tissue repair. Their results suggested that tenacin‐C prevented premature wound contraction. They also demonstrated that α4β1 plays a role in fibronectin binding during granulation tissue formation. In normal wound healing, fibroblasts adhere to fibronectin via α5β1 integrin receptors when entering into the fibrin–fibronectin provisional matrix 35. The provisional matrix contains mostly plasma‐derived fibronectin 4. This plasma fibronectin contains predominantly subunits for α5β1 integrin binding in contrast to tissue fibronectin that contains more subunits with a binding site for α4β1 34. When the provisional matrix is degraded and replaced by granulation tissue, fibronectin fragments bind to α4β1. However, for this binding, α4β1 needs to be activated and this activation can be achieved by exogenous treatment, in this case Mn2+. This in vitro study highlighted several ways of modulating fibronectin matrix interaction with cells in tissue repair. This is important because accumulation of fibronectin‐rich fibrillar matrix will stimulate further matrix deposition.

A review by Singh et al. 32 outlined the composition of fibronectin and ECM. They suggested that focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is mandatory for integrin binding. FAK is also needed for fibroblast assembly of fibronectin fibres as well as to maintain matrix association with the cell surface. When a fibril grows, the matrix matures. During that phase the matrix is converted into an insoluble form. Fibronectin matrix assembly is a dynamic and continuous process. Continuous polymerisation of fibronectin is essential in order to stabilise the matrix to the cell surface. Other ECM proteins that depend on fibronectin during their assembly are elastic fibres and type I collagen. Because of the ability of different splicing, Singh et al. 32 concluded that current understanding of the requirements for all of these binding sites is limited because of differences in the experimental approach that yielded different interpretations of function. Whilst Singh et al. produced an excellent review of the function of fibronectin, it is difficult to translate some of this to clinical practice. This might indicate that all the research performed so far was focussed on the exposure of the complex structure and of the different functions of this adhesive molecule.

ECM remodelling is a complex and regulated process and is necessary for regulation of cell migration 10. From their in vitro research in fibronectin polymerisation, Sottile and Hocking 9 demonstrated that polymerisation of fibronectin into the ECM leads to composition and stability of the ECM and to cell‐matrix adhesion 9. Fibronectin polymerisation promotes collagen types I and III deposition into the ECM and regulates the turnover and endocytosis of ECM collagen I, which results in stabilisation of collagen I matrix fibrils 11. A study by Shi and Sottile 36 demonstrated that membrane‐type matrix metalloproteinase 1 (MT1‐MMP/MMP 14) promotes the turnover of ECM fibronectin by regulating the cleavage of large fibronectin fibrils and subsequently regulates endocytoses of the α5β1 integrin. Furthermore, they showed that inhibiting fibronectin polymerisation accelerates myofibroblast migration 36.

Although these studies demonstrated the important role of fibronectin in ECM remodelling, they are all only in vitro studies. The role of fibronectin in vivo has not been assessed. Therefore, it has not been possible to correlate these findings to human wound healing, yet.

Role of fibronectin in clinical practice

Following a number of research studies, the role of fibronectin in wound healing is becoming clear. In normal wound healing, its role is visible in all phases. The levels of plasma fibronectin are critical in haemostasis 18. After wounding it is visible that bleeding stops and that a clot is formed. By promoting aggregation of platelets and adhesion to the damaged endothelial surface, fibronectin gives strength to the clot by forming a fibrin–fibronectin network, also called the fibrin–fibronectin provisional matrix 15, 19. This prevents wounds from subsequent bleeding. Although not always visible in clinical practice, fibronectin plays a role in inflammation by promoting macrophage activation and opsonising debris 1, 15.

In the proliferation phase, the provisional matrix and particularly fibronectin is the main conduit for cell migration. About 4 days after wounding, fibroblasts invade the provisional matrix, followed by the endothelial cells 2, 37. Fibroblasts produce matrix proteins for new ECM formation and the endothelial cells promote neovascularisation 1, 2. Together, the new matrix and capillaries form a reddish, shiny hyperaemic granulation tissue that is clearly visible 2. Indirectly, fibronectin mediates wound contraction by providing a scaffold to which both myofibroblast and collagen fibrils can adhere to and contract 38. In clinical practice, this is demonstrated by a difference in original wound size and the final size of the scar that is much smaller. The decrease in wound size is approximately 40% 38.

Lastly, when the scar matures, fibronectin is broken down to create place for collagen deposition, which gives strength to the final scar 2, 38.

Epithelialisation occurring during all phases of wound healing is probably the most visible action in wound healing and during which new epithelial cells migrate into the wound bed owing to the fibronectin provisional matrix 7, 8.

Conclusion

The role of ECM fibronectin in regulating cell proliferation and cell adhesion and deposition of fibronectin into the ECM is difficult to assess 39. This article has highlighted that fibronectin plays a crucial role in ECM formation and also in reepithelialisation. Although fibronectin has many roles, Donaldson and Mahan 24 have only been able to demonstrate part of the picture, and therefore further research is required. However, it is clear that fibronectin interacts with other cells to form an ECM in all stages of wound healing. In addition, the role of fibronectin in the provisional matrix is better established than the mature ECM. However, most of the work on the mature ECM was in vitro and fibronectin behaves differently in wounds in vivo.

References

  • 1. Singer AJ, Clark RA. Cutaneous wound healing. N Eng J Med 1999;341:738–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Enoch S, Leaper DJ. Basic science of wound healing. Surgery (Oxford) 2005;23(2):37–42. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Yamada KM, Clark RA. Provisional matrix. In: Clark RA, editor. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996:57–70. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. To W, Midwood K. Plasma and cellular fibronectin: distinct and independent functions during tissue repair. Fibrogenesis Tissue Repair 2011;4:21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Potts JR, Campbell ID. Fibronectin structure and assembly. Curr Opin Cell Biol 1994;6:648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Larivière B, Rouleau M, Picard S, Beaulieu AD. Human plasma fibronectin potentiates the mitogenic activity of platelet‐derived growth factor and complements its wound healing effects. Wound Repair Regen 2003;11:79–89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Clark RA. Fibronectin in the skin. J Invest Dermatol 1983;81:475–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Clark RA. Fibronectin matrix deposition and fibronectin receptor expression in healing and normal skin. J Invest Dermatol 1990;94(s6):128s–34s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Sottile J, Hocking DC. Fibronectin polymerization regulates the composition and stability of extracellular matrix fibrils and cell‐matrix adhesions. Mol Biol Cell 2002;13:3546–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Sottile J, Shi F, Rublyevska I, Chiang HY, Lust J, Chandler J. Fibronectin‐dependent collagen I deposition modulates the cell response to fibronectin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2007;293:C1934–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Shi F, Harman J, Fujiwara K, Sottile J. Collagen I matrix turnover is regulated by fibronectin polymerization. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2009;298:C1265–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Stenman S, Vaheri A. Distribution of a major connective tissue protein, fibronectin, in normal human tissues. J Exp Med 1978;147:1054–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Alberts B et al. Cell junctions, cell adhesion, and the extracellular matrix. In: Cells in their social context in molecular biology of the cell, 5 edn. New York Garland Science: Taylor & Francis, 2008:1191. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Black DL. Mechanisms of alternative pre‐messenger RNA splicing. Annu Rev Biochem 2003;72:291–336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Clark RA. Wound repair: overview and general considerations. In: Clark RA, editor. The molecular and cellular biology of wound repair, 2 edn. New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996:25–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Johnson KJ, Sage H, Briscoe G, Erickson HP. The compact conformation of fibronectin is determined by intramolecular ionic interactions. J Biol Chem 1999;274:15473–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Uitto J, Olsen DR, Fazio MJ. Extracellular matrix of the skin: 50 years of progress. J Invest Dermatol 1989;92(4 Suppl):61s–70s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Moretti FA, Chauhan AK, Laconcig A, Porro F, Baralle FE, Muro AF. A major fraction of fibronectin present in the extracellular matrix of tissues is plasma‐derived. J Biol Chem 2007;282:28057–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Batty P, Smith JG. Haemostasis. Surgery (Oxford) 2010;28:530–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Clark RA. Fibrin is a many splendored thing. J Invest Dermatol 2003;121:xxi–xxii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Fieguth A, Feldbrugge H, Gerich T, Kleemann WJ, Troger HD. The time‐dependent expression of fibronectin, MRP8, MRP14 and defensin in surgically treated human skin wounds. Forensic Sci Int 2003;131(2–3):156–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Grinnell F, Billingham RE, Burgess, L . Distribution of fibronectin during wound healing in vivo. J Invest Dermatol 1981;76:181–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Clark RA, Lanigan JM, Dellapelle P, Manseau E, Dvorak HF, Colvin RB. Fibronectin and fibrin provide a provisional matrix for epidermal cell migration during wound reepithelialization. J Invest Dermatol 1982;79:264–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Donaldson DJ, Mahan JT. Fibrinogen and fibronectin as substrates for epidermal cell migration during wound closure. J Cell Sci 1983;62:117–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Guo M, Toda K, Grinnell F. Activation of human keratinocyte migration on type I collagen and fibronectin. J Cell Sci 1990;96(Pt 2):197–205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Donaldson DJ, Mahan JT, Hasty DL, McCarthy JB, Furcht LT. Location of fibronectin domain involved in newt epidermal cell migration. J of Cell Biology 1985;101:73–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Igisu K. The role of fibronectin in the process of wound healing. Thrombosis research 1986;44:455–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Juhasz I, Murphy GF, Yan HC, Herlyn M, Albelda SM. Regulation of extracellular matrix proteins and integrin cell substratum adhesion receptors on epithelium during cutaneous human wound healing in vivo. Am J Pathol 1993;143:1458–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Ongenae KC, Phillips TJ, Park HY. Level of fibronectin mRNA is markedley increased in human chronic wounds. Dermatol Surg 2000;26(5):447–451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Greiling D, Clark RAF. Fibronectin provides a conduit for fibroblast transmigration from collagenous stroma into fibrin clot provisional matrix. J Cell Sci 1997;110:861–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. McAnulty R. Fibroblast and myofibroblast: their source, function and role on disease. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2007;39:666–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Singh P, Carraher C, Schwarzbauer JE. Assembly of fibronectin extracellular matrix. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2010;26:397–419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Corbett SA, Wilson CL, Schwarzbauer JE. Changes in cell spreading and cytoskeletal organization are induced by adhesion to a fibronectin‐fibrin matrix. Blood 1996;88:158–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Midwood KS et al. Modulation of cell‐fibronectin matrix interactions during tissue repair. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc 2006;11:73–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Corbett SA, Schwarzbauer JE. Requirements for alpha 5 beta 1 integrin‐mediated retraction of fibronectin‐fibrin matrices. J Biol Chem 1999;274:20943–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Shi F, Sottile J. MT1‐MMP regulates the turnover and endocytosis of extracellular matrix fibronectin. J Cell Sci 2011;124:4039–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Briggs SL. The role of fibronectin in fibroblast migration during tissue repair. J Wound Care 2005;14:284–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Li J, Chen J, Kirsner R. Pathophysiology of acute wound healing. Clin Dermatol 2007;25:9–18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Sottile J, Hocking DC, Swiatek PJ. Fibronectin matrix assembly enhances adhesion‐dependent cell growth. J Cell Sci 1998;111:2933–43. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Wound Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES