Dear Editors,
Circumcisions have been performed for various cultural and medical reasons, and it is the most frequent surgical procedure performed on boys. The procedure is not difficult but it can cause complications, such as haemorrhaging, penile ischaemia, shortening of the skin, meatal stenosis, urethral fistulas and partial or total loss of phallus 1, 2. Keloid formation after circumcision is reported in very few cases in the literature 1, 2, 3.
A 10‐year‐old boy was admitted to our clinic complaining of an enlarged, round scar on the circumcised region, which was causing him pain and itching (Figure 1). The circumcision procedure had been performed 10 months ago. According to his medical history, an unusual lesion appeared on the penile scar 1 month after the operation. Several pomades and topical lotions were applied to the lesion but this did not provide a cure. A circumferential excision was now made at the scar tissue, and the specimen was sent to the pathology department. The histopathological report revealed a large amount of collagen‐rich tissue comprised of irregular, thick, dense collagen bundles (Figures 2 and 3). Topical steroid was applied for 1 month after the surgery, and 6 months later the cosmetic appearance was good (Figure 4).
Figure 1.

Preoperative view of the keloid tissue.
Figure 2.

Hematoxylin eosin (HE) collagen‐rich tissue that have irregular, thick, dense collagen bundles (×10).
Figure 3.

Hematoxylin eosin (HE) close up view of the pathology (×20).
Figure 4.

Postoperative view of the region at 6 months.
Keloids are caracterised as benign, dense collagen proliferations that contain fibroblasts, mast cells, and proliferating endothelial cells. The endothelial cell mass at the vessels causes hypoxia, which leads to revascularisation. Increased vascularisation is responsible for the excessive collagen formation 3, 4. The deltoid, chin, presternal area, back and neck are the commonly affected areas where this benign growth forms 5, 6. Keloids of the circumcision scar are a rare complication. Browne stated that the skin of the penis never forms keloid 7. However, a few cases are reported in the literature by Warwick et al., Erdemir, Gurunluoglu et al., and Isken et al. 1, 2, 3, 8, 9.
Local pressure and irradiation are inappropriate methods for the treatment of this area 10, and excision is the traditional treatment for keloids and hypertrophic scars. However, the keloid‐forming factors must be reduced after excision, and intralesional steroid injection after surgical excision is the other treatment modality. Lee et al. developed the core extirpation technique, which requires no adjuvant therapy after the procedure 11. However, the keloid was excised and topical steroid treatment was used in this instance. After a 6‐month follow‐up period, no further complications or recurrence of the lesion were observed.
Although keloids of the circumcision scar are considered an unusual complication, it is likely that such cases are more common than those reported in the literature.
Hulda R Ozakpinar1, Elif Sari2, Ugur Horoz1, Mustafa
Durgun3, Ali T Tellioglu4, Bilgihan Acikgoz5
1Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Clinic
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey
2Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department
Kirikkale University Faculty of Medicine
Kirikkale, Turkey
3Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department
Dicle University Faculty of Medicine
Diyarbakir, Turkey
4Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery Department
Yildirim Beyazit Faculty of Medicine
Ankara, Turkey
5Pathology Clinic
Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital
Ankara, Turkey
drelifsanli@hotmail.com
References
- 1. Gurunluoglu R, Bayramicli M, Numanoglu A. Keloid of the penis after circumcision. Br J Plast Surg 1996;49:425–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Gurunluoglu R, Bayramicli M, Numanoglu A. Two patients with penile keloids a review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg 1997;39:662–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Warwick DJ, Dickson WA. Keloid of the penis after circumcision. Postgrad Med J 1993;69:236–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Tai‐lan T, Larry SN. The molecular basis of keloid and hypertrophic scar formation. Mol Med Today 1998;4:19–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Weiss SW, Goldblum JR. Soft tissue tumors. Benign fibrous tissue tumors, 4th edn. St. Louis: Mosby, Elsevier, 2001:295–307. [Google Scholar]
- 6. Cohen IK, Peacock EE. Keloids and hypertrophic scars. In: McCarthy JG, May JW, Littler JW, editors. Plastic Surgery. Philadelphia: WB Saunders, 1990:732–47. [Google Scholar]
- 7. Brown D. Hypospadias. Postgrad Med J 1949;25:367–75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Isken T, Sen C, Işil E, Iscen D, Sozubir S, Gürbüz Y. A very rare complication: keloid formation after circumcision, and its treatment. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008;61:1405–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Erdemir F. A rare complication after circumcision: keloid of the penis. Int Urol Nephrol 2006;38:609–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. McGregor IA. Fundamental techniques of plastic surgery, 8th edn. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1989:18–22. [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lee Y, Minn KW, Baek RM, Hong JJ. A new surgical treatment of keloid: keloid core excision. Ann Plast Surg 2001;46:135e40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
