Skip to main content
International Wound Journal logoLink to International Wound Journal
editorial
. 2009 Mar 6;6(1):2–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-481X.2009.00587.x

Diabetes and landmine‐related amputations: a call to arms to save limbs

M Bharara 1, J L Mills 2, K Suresh 3, H L Rilo 4, D G Armstrong 5
PMCID: PMC7951273  PMID: 19291109

The effects of landmine‐related morbidity have long been the subject of intense attention by the media, governments and non‐governmental organizations alike 1, 2, 3. While much remains to be done in this area, it can be argued that major advances have been made 4, 5, 6. At the other end of the spectrum, the epidemic of diabetes‐related limb amputations continues its inexorable rise; despite a surprisingly high 5‐year mortality associated with this preventable scourge, the lay public and press seem largely unaware and policy‐makers have failed to appropriately respond (7).

In many ways, diabetes‐related amputations are strikingly similar to those associated with landmines. This intriguing comparison emphasizes the silent nature of the ‘warfare’ and the sinister consequences on the life of patients/victims. From a pubic health standpoint, diabetes‐related amputations are now more common than those resulting from exploding hidden landmines, leading to 70% of the lower extremity amputations around the world (8). Certainly, huge progress has been made in the areas of offloading, aggressive wound healing protocols and prevention 9, 10. But how does this progress compare to the magnitude of the problem, especially when considering the developing and developed nations on the same scale?(11) Undoubtedly, we are currently losing this silent war and much needs to be done at various levels (community, providers, media, government and non‐government organizations) if we want to win.

Diabetes is a worldwide‐epidemic; in 2006, there were more than 230 million individuals with diabetes; in 20 years, this number is expected to reach 350 million. This high incidence of diabetes, coupled with the associated 43–55% 5‐year mortality rates after new‐onset diabetic limb ulceration, which increase up to 74% for patients with lower‐extremity amputation, will mount significant pressure on global healthcare infrastructure. It is striking to note that these mortality rates are higher than those for several types of cancer including prostate, breast, colon, and Hodgkin’s disease 7, 8, 12. While it is inexpensive to produce a landmine(3), the consequences invariably lead to lower extremity amputations, with subsequent loss of livelihood and poor quality of life. ‘A single landmine might cost $1, but once in the ground locating it and making it safe can cost up to $1000.’13, 14

We face a daunting uphill task in combating an even more treacherous and formidable foe. Diabetes is often silent, lurking beneath the clinical surface; a foot ulceration or infection is a common early manifestation during the course of the disease. It is usually underlying neuropathy, which leads to foot ulceration. A Semmes‐Weinstein filament costs pennies to produce and is often provided free to diabetes care clinics around the world; its more widespread use to detect diabetic neuropathy in its early stages would be an enormously cost‐effective equivalent of expensive detectors to search for unexploded landmines.

Extensive new initiatives by the World Diabetes Federation (WDF) and World Health Organization (WHO), especially in developing countries, to improve the treatment of diabetes and implement targeted and proven prevention strategies have certainly helped to combat this epidemic. Organized prevention efforts coupled with timely and aggressive interventions when needed can improve patient outcomes and reduce amputation rates. (15)

Landmine‐related amputations are a global problem affecting 84 countries and eight territories worldwide. It is estimated that approximately 800 people die each month, while 1200 sustain non‐fatal injuries from landmine related injuries 2, 3.

Diabetes around the globe results in one major limb amputation every 30 seconds, over 2500 limbs lost per day! In India alone, 40 000 amputations are performed annually (16). These staggering figures underline the enormous scale of the problem. This appears to be more than 50 times more frequent than reported landmine casualties. Therefore, a joint perspective that aims to develop awareness in both developing and developed nations about the truth that surrounds us in this modern day silent war against diabetes can help shape our strategies and support further research in this area. As with landmines, the effects of diabetes are irreversible. They both lurk silently before suddenly exploding, destroying the limbs and lives of their innocent victims. The authors wish to sound the alarm. To save limbs, we call to arms the public, the media, the health care community, and policymakers throughout the world to join together in battle.

References

  • 1. International Campaign to Ban Landmines (ICBL) . The online version of landmine monitor report: towards a mine free world, Vol. 2008. ICBL, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Red Cross. Anti‐personnel mines: an overview. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Office of International Security and Peacekeeping Operations . Hidden killer: the global landmines crisis. In: US Department of State Bureau of Political‐Military Affairs, editors. Washington, DC: US Government, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Smith WK, Wu Y, Pitkin M. Rehabilitation after landmine injury. Pain Med 2006;7 Suppl 2:S218–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Soroush A, Falahati F, Zargar M, Soroush M, Khateri S, Khaji A. Amputations due to landmine and unexploded ordnances in post‐war Iran. Arch Iran Med 2008;11:595–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Wiffen P, Meynadier J, Dubois M, Thurel C, De Smet J, Harden RN. Diagnostic and treatment issues in postamputation pain after landmine injury. Pain Med 2006;7 Suppl 2:S209–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Armstrong DG, Wrobel J, Robbins JM. Guest Editorial: are diabetes‐related wounds and amputations worse than cancer? Int Wound J 2007;4:286–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Boulton AJ, Vileikyte L, Ragnarson‐Tennvall G, Apelqvist J. The global burden of diabetic foot disease. Lancet 2005;366:1719–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Rogers LC, Lavery LA, Armstrong DG. The right to bear legs—an amendment to healthcare: how preventing amputations can save billions for the US Health‐care System. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2008;98:166–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lavery LA, Peters EJ, Armstrong DG. What are the most effective interventions in preventing diabetic foot ulcers? Int Wound J 2008;5:425–33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Van Houtum WH. Amputations and ulceration; pitfalls in assessing incidence. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2008;24 Suppl 1:S14–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Mills JL, Beckett WC, Taylor SM. The diabetic foot: consequences of delayed treatment and referral. South Med J 1991;84:970–4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Red Cross. Conference document of certain conventional documents. Geneva: International Committee of the Red Cross, 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Daily S. Simple and inexpensive landmine detection system is under development, Vol 2008. Rockville: Science Daily, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Canavan RJ, Unwin NC, Kelly WF, Connolly VM. Diabetes‐ and nondiabetes‐related lower extremity amputation incidence before and after the introduction of better organized diabetes foot care: continuous longitudinal monitoring using a standard method. Diabetes Care 2008;31:459–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Federation ID. Put feet first: prevent amputations. Chennai: International Diabetes Federation, 2005. [Google Scholar]

Articles from International Wound Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES