Expansion microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid

Eloïse Bertiaux; Aurélia C Balestra; Lorène Bournonville; Vincent Louvel; Bohumil Maco; Dominique Soldati-Favre; Mathieu Brochet; Paul Guichard; Virginie Hamel

doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020

. 2021 Mar 11;19(3):e3001020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020

Expansion microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid

Eloïse Bertiaux ^1,^#, Aurélia C Balestra ^2,^#, Lorène Bournonville ¹, Vincent Louvel ¹, Bohumil Maco ², Dominique Soldati-Favre ², Mathieu Brochet ^2,^*, Paul Guichard ^1,^*, Virginie Hamel ^1,^*

Editor: Michael Duffy³

PMCID: PMC7951857 PMID: 33705377

Abstract

Malaria is caused by unicellular Plasmodium parasites. Plasmodium relies on diverse microtubule cytoskeletal structures for its reproduction, multiplication, and dissemination. Due to the small size of this parasite, its cytoskeleton has been primarily observable by electron microscopy (EM). Here, we demonstrate that the nanoscale cytoskeleton organisation is within reach using ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM). In developing microgametocytes, U-ExM allows monitoring the dynamic assembly of axonemes and concomitant tubulin polyglutamylation in whole cells. In the invasive merozoite and ookinete forms, U-ExM unveils the diversity across Plasmodium stages and species of the subpellicular microtubule arrays that confer cell rigidity. In ookinetes, we additionally identify an apical tubulin ring (ATR) that colocalises with markers of the conoid in related apicomplexan parasites. This tubulin-containing structure was presumed to be lost in Plasmodium despite its crucial role in motility and invasion in other apicomplexans. Here, U-ExM reveals that a divergent and considerably reduced form of the conoid is actually conserved in Plasmodium species.

An expansion microscopy study of Plasmodium species, parasites that cause malaria, unveils novel cytoskeletal features including a remnant conoid - a tubulin structure that was presumed to be lost in these organisms despite its crucial role in host cell invasion by related apicomplexan parasites.

Introduction

Malaria is caused by unicellular Plasmodium parasites that belong to the phylum Apicomplexa. More than 6,000 species have been described in this phylum [1] including numerous human and animal pathogens such as Toxoplasma gondii and Cryptosporidia. During their life cycle, apicomplexan parasites undergo multiple differentiation steps into morphologically distinct forms sustaining either (i) sexual reproduction; (ii) asexual replication; or (iii) dissemination via egress and invasion of host cells [2]. Each of the stages relies on diverse microtubule cytoskeletal structures that either share general characteristics with those of other eukaryotic organisms or are unique to these parasites.

A unique cytoskeletal feature that distinguishes Apicomplexa from other eukaryotes is the apical complex. This complex is assembled in polarised invasive stages, called zoites. It includes specialised secretory organelles and a microtubule organising centre (MTOC) called the apical polar ring (APR). The secretory organelles release various factors necessary for egress, motility, and invasion [3]. An array of subpellicular microtubules nucleates from the APR and confers the shape and stability to the parasite [3]. Two additional electron dense rings have been described above the large and thick APR in multiple apicomplexan parasites, including Plasmodium zoites [4,5]. The fine structure and molecular composition of the apical complex differ among apicomplexan parasites and probably reflect different mechanical or functional requirements linked to the range of invaded host cells. For example, the presence or absence of a hollow tapered barrel structure composed of tubulin called the conoid [6] has defined 2 classes within the Apicomplexa. The Conoidasida, such as coccidia, including T. gondii and gregarines, possess a conoid [7]. Based on ultrastructural data, Plasmodium has been traditionally considered to lack a conoid and belongs to the Aconoidasida [8]. While the structure of the apical complex is relatively well characterised in some apicomplexan parasites such as T. gondii [9], its molecular composition remains elusive and difficult to visualise in Plasmodium.

Our understanding of Plasmodium microtubule-based structures heavily relies on electron microscopy (EM). Fluorescent light microscopy is instrumental to complement EM with the possibility of using multiple markers to infer the dynamic and the molecular composition of Plasmodium cytoskeletons. However, owing to the small size of the parasites, subcellular imaging by fluorescent light microscopy still poses a major challenge in Plasmodium. Super-resolution techniques have recently been implemented, but structured illumination microscopy (SIM) provides only slightly improved resolution (approximately 120 nm) in comparison to diffraction-limited light microscopy (approximately 240 nm), while stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy can reach a resolution of up to 35 nm [10,11]. However, the iron-rich hemozoin crystals present in the asexually replicating blood stages and sexual stages cause cell disintegration when illuminated with the high-power STED laser [12,13]. The implementation of guided or rescue STED has partly circumvented this issue by automatically deactivating the STED depletion laser in highly reflective regions of the sample to prevent local damage [12,13]. Because of the limit of resolution of fluorescent microscopy or the technical limitations of super-resolution microscopy, the structure and molecular composition of the Plasmodium microtubule cytoskeleton remain difficult to interrogate.

Here, we reasoned that physical expansion of Plasmodium cells in an isotropic fashion by ultrastructure expansion microscopy (U-ExM) [14] could provide an accessible bridge between traditional fluorescent microscopy and EM, as previously shown in T. gondii [15,16]. We expanded multiple Plasmodium stages and species including 2 zoite stages, Plasmodium falciparum schizonts, Plasmodium berghei schizonts, and P. berghei ookinetes, as well as developing P. berghei microgametes. We show that U-ExM resolves the structure of the axonemes, the mitotic hemispindles as well as the subpellicular microtubules. Importantly, it reveals the existence of an apical tubulin ring (ATR) colocalising with markers of the conoid in other parasites that is atop the APR of motile ookinetes, suggesting that the remnant of a conoid was retained in this genus. In conclusion, U-ExM enables visualisation of cytoskeletal structures at a nanoscale resolution in Plasmodium and represents an accessible method without the need of specialised microscopes.

Results

U-ExM is effective in diverse stages of the Plasmodium life cycle

To test the potential of U-ExM [14] to image Plasmodium, we compared protocols for fluorescent microscopy of tubulin structures with or without expansion on multiple life cycle stages (Fig 1). Briefly, Plasmodium parasites were first sedimented on poly-D-lysine coated coverslips prior to cold methanol fixation. Next, proteins of the samples were anchored to a swellable polymer, followed by denaturation and expansion. Immunostaining was subsequently performed post-expansion as previously described [14] (Fig 1A).

Fig 1 — (A) Schematic illustration of U-ExM protocol applied to *Plasmodium* samples. (**B, D, F**) Epifluorescence images of a P. *berghei* gametocyte (B), a P. *berghei* ookinete (D), and a P. *falciparum* schizont (F) stained for α- and β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and DNA (cyan). Scale bar: 5 μm. (**C, E, G**) Same stages as above expanded using U-ExM and stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568). Scale bar: 5 μm. (H) Average size of the different studied stages before (IFA) and after expansion (U-ExM). Numbers of Gametocytes: IFA, 25; U-ExM, 28; Ookinetes (length): IFA, 11; U-ExM, 18; Ookinetes (width): IFA, 11; U-ExM, 17; Schizonts: IFA, 30; U-ExM, 47. Orange: ratio between the size before and after expansion are indicated. Blue: gel expansion factor. The raw data can be found in S1 Data. IFA, immunofluorescence assay; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy.

We first imaged the development of P. berghei microgametocytes into microgametes, a process that is essential for sexual reproduction and establishment of infection in the mosquito (Fig 1B). During microgametogenesis, the component parts of 8 axonemes are assembled within the gametocyte cytoplasm to form flagellated male gametes in a process called exflagellation. Confocal imaging of cells stained for α/β-tubulin showed a bundle of undistinguishable axonemes coiled around the octoploid nucleus. In contrast, expanded gametocytes resolved individual axonemes (Fig 1C), featuring the gain of resolution obtained using U-ExM. Importantly, comparison of the average diameters of cells with or without expansion indicated an approximately 4.2-fold size increase in the linear dimension, from around 5 to 20 μm (Fig 1H, S1 Fig).

We then applied U-ExM to P. berghei ookinete, a large motile extracellular zoite of 10 to 12 μm in length, responsible for colonisation of the mosquito midgut that displays a subpellicular microtubule network radiating from the APR. Non-expanded ookinetes stained for α/β-tubulin showed a diffuse cytoplasmic signal with an enrichment at the cell periphery and no visible microtubule structures (Fig 1D). Expanded cells showed an approximately 4.2-fold increase in both width and length, highlighting the isotropic expansion of the specimen (Fig 1E and 1H, S1 Fig). This resulted in the clear resolution of individual subpellicular microtubules that radiate from the APR (Fig 1E, S1 Fig).

Next, we stained schizonts of P. falciparum. During erythrocytic schizogony, the parasite undergoes multiple rounds of replications to form up to 32 merozoites per schizont. Merozoites are approximately 1 to 2 μm long zoites that upon rupture of the host erythrocyte quickly reinvade erythrocytes. Confocal imaging of late stage schizonts prior to expansion showed a punctuate signal for α/β-tubulin (Fig 1F). Sample expansion showed a 4.3-fold increase in global size without apparent major morphological distortions and highlighted the previously described mitotic hemispindles [13] (Fig 1G and 1H, S1 Fig).

Altogether, expansion of 3 stages from 2 Plasmodium species indicates a consistent approximately 4.2-fold size increase in the linear dimension (Fig 1H) and demonstrates that U-ExM can be readily applied to multiple Plasmodium stages, revealing subtle details of its internal cytoskeleton organisation.

U-ExM allows visualisation of axonemal microtubules and their polyglutamylation in fully reconstructed gametocytes

Plasmodium assembles a flagellum exclusively prior to the formation of the microgamete in the midgut of the mosquito vector [17]. Microgametogenesis is an explosive development with 3 rounds of genome replication and endomitosis, paralleled by the assembly of 8 axonemes to form 8 microgametes within 10 to 20 minutes of activation [18,19]. The axonemes display the classical organisation with 9 doublets of microtubules arranged in a circular pattern surrounding a central pair of singlet microtubules [20]. Flagellum formation in Plasmodium is remarkably different from known models [21]. Axonemes are assembled within the cytoplasm of the microgametocyte independently of intraflagellar transport [22], and the flagellum is formed later, after the initiation of axoneme beating [23]. EM observations indicate that this atypical and rapid synthesis is associated with frequent axoneme misassembly [23]. As the exact mode of assembly remains unknown, an understanding as to the specific origins of these presumed errors might inform us of the molecular mechanisms of axoneme pattern determination [23].

Therefore, we undertook the analysis of axonemal assembly in cellulo in microgametocytes using U-ExM (Fig 2A–2D). To do so, we immunolabelled for α/β tubulin microgametocytes that were fixed 15 minutes after gametogenesis activation, when the first exflagellation events are observed. This revealed snapshots of axonemal assembly that have only been visible by EM observations of serial sections. We observed a wide range of patterns, ranging from incomplete axoneme formation where fan-shaped arrays of short microtubules radiate from the basal body (Fig 2A, S2 Fig) to apparently fully assembled axonemes (Fig 2C). A detailed analysis of 25 whole-cell projections revealed that only 4% (1/25) of 15-minute activated gametocytes showed fully formed axonemes, while the others cells presented 3 main and nonexclusive intermediate states. First, 80% of cells (20/25) showed less than 8 axonemes, which could reflect defects in basal body replication or other early impairment of microtubule polymerisation (Fig 2A and 2B, S2 Fig). Second, we observed that within single gametocytes, both incomplete and fully assembled axonemes coexist within a shared cytoplasm (Fig 2B, S2 Fig). Third, 44% (11/25) of the imaged axonemes displayed apparently free microtubule singlets or doublets (Fig 2A–2C, white arrows; S2 Fig). In contrast to the frequent observation of misassembled axonemes in developing gametocytes, the axoneme of free microgametes did not show such apparent defects (Fig 2D). To ascertain that the observed structures correspond to non-assembled axonemes, we imaged Kin8B-KO microgametocytes where full-length singlet or doublet microtubules are formed but not assembled into the 9+2 pattern [24,25]. As previously reported, we could not observe assembled axonemes in Kin8B-KO microgametocytes (0%; 27/27) 15 minutes after activation (Fig 2E and 2F), demonstrating that U-ExM allows visualisation of microtubule singlets or doublets not incorporated into the 9+2 pattern.

To take advantage of the versatility of U-ExM, we then stained gametocytes for polyglutamylated tubulin a posttranslational modification that stabilises microtubules with various roles in regulating flagellar motility [26]. Polyglutamylation (PolyE) was observed on both assembling and full-length axonemes (Fig 2A–2D), although we also observed that some microtubules that were not incorporated into mature flagella were lacking PolyE (Fig 2A–2C, white arrows; S2 and S3 Figs). These results suggest that PolyE is added onto assembling axonemes and is more strongly detected in fully formed axonemes (S3 Fig). To test whether PolyE is dependent on axonemal formation, we specifically stained Kin8B-KO microgametocytes and detected a signal of PolyE on microtubules from non-assembled axonemes as well as a high background in the cytoplasm of the gametocytes, possibly reflecting unincorporated polyglutamylated tubulin dimers or cross-reactivity with other glutamylated proteins whose distribution is altered in the mutant. Consistent with this, polyglutamylated tubulin was not affected in the mutant line (S3 Fig). Altogether, these results suggest that PolyE deposition occurs in a timely manner during axoneme formation, but that is independent from complete assembly (Fig 2E).

Altogether, U-ExM unveils details of axoneme formation in whole cells to levels that have only been accessible by EM. Based on these results, we anticipate that expansion microscopy will reveal new aspects of Plasmodium gametogenesis that have been overlooked by conventional fluorescence microscopy.

U-ExM resolves the hemispindles and reveals a distinct organisation of subpellicular microtubules in P. falciparum and P. berghei schizonts

We then analysed expanded 40 to 48 hours P. falciparum schizonts stained for α/β tubulin (Fig 3). Two distinct microtubule structures were observed in this stage by U-ExM: the mitotic hemispindles and the subpellicular microtubules. In late schizonts, we observed the hemispindles that form an array of microtubules, which radiate from single MTOCs, as revealed by centrin staining (Fig 3A and 3B arrowheads indicate centrin dots at the mitotic spindle pole). Per centriolar plaque, we observed an average of 4 hemispindles ranging from 0.5 to 2 μm (Fig 3C and 3F), as previously described [27]. Interestingly, the hemispindles were not polyglutamylated as opposed to mitotic spindles in other eukaryotic cells [28], possibly suggesting a requirement for dynamic spindles in Plasmodium (Fig 3D and 3E).

In P. falciparum segmenter schizonts, U-ExM resolved 1 to 2 subpellicular microtubules per merozoite that were on average 0.7 μm long (Fig 3G, 3J and 3K), as previously described by EM [4,5] or STED microscopy[13]. As opposed to the hemispindles, subpellicular microtubules exhibited a polar distribution of PolyE (Fig 3G–3I). Expansion of P. berghei segmenter schizonts revealed a similar pattern where PolyE is observed towards the apical end of the parasite. However, intracellular or free P. berghei merozoites contained up to 9 subpellicular microtubules (Fig 3H and 3K). To ascertain that the observed structures corresponded to subpellicular microtubules, we labelled proteins of expanded parasites in bulk with N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) ester dye conjugates, which bind to amines (S4 Fig). NHS-ester staining delineated the merozoite shape as well as contrasted structures with different protein density that likely correspond to the APR and the 2 secretory vesicles named rhoptries. As expected, the microtubules appeared to be located underneath the pellicle and nucleating from the APR, further confirming that they correspond to subpellicular microtubules. These differences between P. falciparum and P. berghei schizonts highlight the diversity of the apical complex organisation across species within the Plasmodium genus.

The P. berghei ookinete possesses a remnant conoid

The apical complex of P. falciparum merozoites was shown to contain 3 electron dense concentric rings (referred to as polar rings [5]), with the smallest directly adjacent to the apical tip [4,5]. The third proximal ring, the APR, is much thicker than the 2 other apical rings and serves as a MTOC for the subpellicular microtubules. Despite previous observations of the apical complex by ultrastructural studies, there is relatively limited knowledge of its molecular composition and variation across the different zoite stages in Plasmodium [29]. We thus analysed expanded P. berghei ookinetes similarly stained for α/β tubulin and polyglutamylated tubulin (Fig 4A). A significantly larger number of subpellicular microtubules (>40) that radiate from the APR and covering most of the ookinete body were distinctly observed in expanded ookinetes, a number consistent with previous EM observations ranging from 47 to 59 [30–33]. As in segmented schizonts, the subpellicular microtubules were polyglutamylated (Fig 4A, S5 Fig). A less intense signal for PolyE was observed at the apical extremity of the ookinete, likely corresponding to the electron dense collar structure region [34] (Fig 4A, S5 Fig).

Importantly, the improved resolution of U-ExM in ookinetes allowed us to observe a ring of tubulin above the APR that we named the ATR (Fig 4A). We then separately stained for α and β tubulin and found that both are present at the ATR, suggesting that it is composed by α-β heterodimers (S6 Fig). The observation of the ATR was unexpected as such a ring of tubulin is reminiscent of a conoid found in coccidian but thought to be lost in the Haemosporidia order containing Plasmodium [2]. In T. gondii tachyzoites, the conoid is a central component of the apical complex and consists in a set of tubulin fibres that form a cone-shaped structure located between the APR and 2 additional apical rings called the preconoidal rings [35]. A pair of intra-conoidal microtubules additionally traverses the preconoidal rings and the conoid. We thus wondered whether the ATR could represent a structure related to the conoid in Plasmodium.

First, we noticed that the ATR is not polyglutamylated consistent with previous observations for the conoid of T. gondii [16] (Fig 4A). Of relevance, some proteins associated with the conoid in T. gondii [29, 35] are also conserved in Plasmodium [29]. This includes the SAS-6-like (SAS6L) protein that has been demonstrated to form an apical ring in Plasmodium ookinetes [36]. In expanded ookinetes, endogenously tagged SAS6L- green fluorescent protein (GFP) [36] colocalised with the ATR (Fig 4B). While the distance between the SAS6L-GFP/ATR ring and the APR was the same, the diameter of the SAS6L-GFP ring was slightly shorter suggesting that SAS6L-GFP or at least its carboxyl terminus is facing the interior of the ATR (Fig 4D and 4E). In Plasmodium, MyoB was also shown to localise at a discrete apical location in merozoite and ookinete [37] and was suggested to fulfil, at least in part, a similar role as the conoid-associated myosin H in T. gondii [38]. U-ExM revealed that endogenously tagged MyoB-GFP [37] formed a dotty ring at the ookinete apex (Fig 4C). However, this ring was larger and slightly above the ATR/SAS6L-GFP ring, further suggesting the presence of multiple apical rings in ookinetes (Fig 4C–4E). However, despite the presence of the ATR, no intra-conoidal microtubule could be observed.

Another characteristic of the T. gondii conoid lies in its ability to protrude through the APR upon stimulation of egress and motility [9]. We thus tested whether the ATR position was linked to the motility of ookinete by comparing its position in motile and nonmotile ookinetes (Fig 4F–4J). Ookinetes rely on the cGMP-dependent protein kinase G (PKG) to sustain productive secretion and gliding motility [39,40]. To determine the position of the ATR upon PKG activation in wild-type parasites, we imaged mutants of the cGMP-producing guanylyl cyclase beta (GCβ) that show severely reduced motility, with only rare bouts of slow gliding [39,41,42]. In motile wild-type ookinetes, the distance between the APR and the ATR was of 200 nm, while in 34% of GCβ⁻ ookinetes, the ATR was in close proximity to the APR (Fig 4H). The remaining mutant parasites showed a significantly reduced distance of 145 nm between the ATR and the APR (Fig 4J, S7 Fig). These results suggest that the position of the ATR relative to the APR depends on the activation of motility in ookinetes.

To determine the position of both the APR and the ATR in a morphological spatial context, we labelled proteins of expanded ookinetes in bulk with NHS ester dye conjugates. NHS-ester staining delineated the ookinete shape as well as contrasted regions with different protein density that likely correspond to the collar, the apical termini of the inner membrane complex (IMC, also termed alveoli) and the subpellicular microtubules (Fig 5A, S8 Fig). Further staining for α/β tubulin revealed that the APR is located within the third upper end of the collar, while the ATR is likely in line with the IMC and the collar as inferred by EM (Fig 5C–5J, S1 Video). An additional protrusion was also observed above the ATR by NHS-ester staining, which may correspond to a small protrusion of the plasma membrane frequently observed by EM (Fig 5C–5F).

Fig 5 — (A) Merged representative confocal image of an expanded ookinete stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta) and NHS-ester (grey). The magenta arrow indicates the position of the ATR. Scale bar: 1 μm. (B) Insets of the apical region from (A) highlighting the position of the ATR relative to the general ookinete structural features. (C) EM image of the apical region of an ookinete. Black arrowhead points to the apical protrusion. Scale bar: 250 nm. (**D, E**) Section (D) or maximum intensity projection (E) of the apical region of an expanded ookinete stained for NHS-ester from an entire image stack. Black arrowhead points to the apical protrusion. Scale bar: 250 nm. (F) Schematic representation of the apical region highlighting the apical protrusion, the collar, and subpellicular microtubules. (G) Section of a stack of an expanded ookinete stained with NHS-ester (grey) and α/β-tubulin (magenta). Dotted square indicates the position of the zoom shown in H. Scale bar: 500 nm. (H) Zoom in from image in G. Dotted line with the open arrowhead indicates the position of the ATR, the black arrowhead shows the apical protrusion, the magenta arrowhead points to the ATR, and the black arrow to the position of the plot profile (I). Scale bar: 250 nm. (I) Plot profile intensity over length in nm showing the position of the ATR relative to the apical protrusion. Note that the ATR position is in line with the end of the collar and/or the IMC, below the apical protrusion. The underlying data can be found in S1 Data. (J) Three-dimensional rendering of an NHS-ester/tubulin overlay (grey and magenta, respectively) of an expanded ookinete. Black and magenta arrowheads indicate the apical protrusion and ATR, respectively. ATR, apical tubulin ring; EM, electron microscopy; IMC, inner membrane complex; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that U-ExM can be applied successfully to several Plasmodium species and life cycle stages to unveil ultrastructural details of the microtubule cytoskeleton that was, up to now, only reachable by EM. Imaging axoneme formation during microgametogenesis gave new insights into their mode of assembly (Fig 6A). For example, we show that posttranslational modifications such as PolyE occur in forming axonemes. We also observed different and nonexclusive states with either less than 8 axonemes per microgametocyte, axonemes with different lengths within a cell, or frequent misincorporation of microtubules towards the distal extremity of the axoneme. It remains unknown whether these observations reflect transient intermediate stages of assembly or terminal errors, as previously suggested [23]. However, as free gametes did not show obvious defects in axoneme assembly, it is tempting to speculate that microtubules may still grow and bundle upon the initiation of beating. Another possibility would be that only fully formed mature axonemes initiate efficient beating to form motile microgametes even in the presence of other defective axonemes in the same microgametocyte (S2 Fig). Further experimental characterisations will be required to test these hypotheses.

Fig 6 — (A) Proposed model of axonemal assembly in microgametocytes featuring the coexistence of short fan-shaped or basket-like microtubules with partly assembled and fully assembled axonemes. Basal bodies are represented at the base of axonemes. Microtubules: magenta and PolyE: green. (B) Proposed models of the apical complex organisation in P. *falciparum* and P. *berghei* merozoites illustrating the diversity of the subpellicular microtubules organisation. The orientation of the polyglutamylation profile of the subpellicular microtubules in the P. *berghei* merozoite is based on **Fig 3H**. Grey denotes the presence of additional electron dense rings observed by EM whose molecular composition remains unknown. The relative position of MyoB (dotted yellow) in merozoite is currently unknown. (C) Model of the apical complex organisation in P. *berghei* ookinete superimposed on an NHS-ester stained expanded ookinete. This model highlights a conoid-like structure present in ookinete, composed of an ATR (magenta) and SAS6L (cyan) above the APR (grey). An additional MyoB ring is also detected in ookinete (yellow). The complex made of the ATR and SAS6L/MyoB rings is in line with the collar and/or the IMC, below the apical protrusion and above the APR. APR, apical polar ring; ATR, apical tubulin ring; IMC, inner membrane complex; SAS6L, SAS-6-like.

The most striking feature revealed by U-ExM was the presence of an ATR in ookinetes that most likely corresponds to a remnant conoid. The structure of the ATR appears significantly reduced or compacted compared with the spiralling tubulin fibres that form the conoid in other members of Apicomplexa. It remains unknown whether the ATR is of the same nature as the tubulin fibres forming the conoid that adopt a curvature that is not compatible with microtubules [6]. Altogether, multiple lines of evidence indicate that the ATR is related to the conoid (Fig 6B). First, the ATR colocalises closely with the SAS6L ring [36] that is associated with the conoid in T. gondii [29,35]. Second, the ATR position relative to the APR depends on the activation of ookinete motility and secretion, a characteristic reminiscent of the enigmatic protrusion of the conoid that happens upon activation of secretion and motility in T. gondii tachyzoites [9]. Third, the ATR is associated with at least 1 additional tightly apposed ring that may correspond to one of the so-called preconoidal rings in T. gondii. This additional ring is composed of MyoB, which was proposed to fulfil, at least in part, a similar role as the conoid-associated myosin H in T. gondii [38]. Interestingly, while MyoB is also expressed in schizonts [37], the ATR/SAS6L ring is not observed at this stage [36], further confirming that the Plasmodium apical complex shows stage-specific variations in its composition, as previously proposed [29,36]. In line with this, our results also reveal additional species specificities at given stages with the observation of different numbers of subpellicular microtubules between P. berghei and P. falciparum merozoites.

While the ATR likely corresponds to a remnant conoid, its position in line with the IMC and the collar in ookinete is remarkable. This suggests that when the ATR moves away from the APR, the whole apex of the ookinete does so, including the IMC and the collar. It thus seems that the apical complex is internalised within the Plasmodium ookinete. As in T. gondii tachyzoites, no obvious structure between the APR and the ATR can be highlighted by NHS-ester staining or EM, and it remains unknown how the relative position between the ATR and the APR is maintained. We also observed that a small protrusion of the plasma membrane frequently observed by EM is above the ATR. It is possible that additional preconoidal ring proteins create this extension but that the associated structures are not as electron dense as known preconoidal rings in T. gondii tachyzoites or P. falciparum merozoites to be assigned as such by EM or NHS-ester U-ExM. In addition to SAS6L and MyoB, several other proteins associated with the conoid in T. gondii have been recently shown to be expressed in Plasmodium schizonts, ookinetes, and sporozoites [9,29] and may localise at different locations in the apical complex. For example, the recently described PBANKA_1334800 that shows radial spines at the apical end of ookinetes [29] is likely one of the proteins in between the IMC and the apical ends of the subpellicular microtubules. We expect that U-ExM will allow defining the exact position of apical complex proteins in multiple Plasmodium stages.

We thus propose that Plasmodium parasites retained a conoid that is significantly divergent and reduced compared to the best described T. gondii conoid, which likely prevented its identification. Our results also suggest that the tubulin structure that initially defined the conoid is not expressed in all Plasmodium zoites, raising new questions on the molecular nature of the conoid. It now appears that the conoid is likely a conserved organelle in Plasmodium. However, its molecular composition is more diverse than initially expected, and the physiological requirements associated with this diversity remain mysterious. It was suggested that the conoid plays a mechanical role in the invasion by enteric apicomplexan parasites that must penetrate the thick barrier of the intestinal epithelium of vertebrates [2]. The observed variations in the molecular composition of the conoid between schizont and ookinete or the different numbers of subpellicular microtubules between P. berghei and P. falciparum schizonts thus likely reflect adaptations of the apical complex to the different host cells or environment encountered by these zoites.

Here, expansion microscopy reveals new features of the Plasmodium apical complex that have not been characterised before. Moreover, expansion microscopy methods have been successfully coupled with super-resolution approaches, leading to a further increase in resolution [14]. Such approaches might pave the way for further investigation of the Plasmodium cytoskeleton and its molecular organisation. Finally, the recently developed membrane-based expansion microscopy protocols [43, 44] could also provide other exciting insights into the membrane biology of Plasmodium. In summary, the use of expansion microscopy can nicely complement electron and super-resolution microscopy as it provides molecular details to the available structural information.

Material and methods

All primary and secondary antibodies used in this study can be found in S1 Table.

Ethics statement

All animal experiments were conducted with the authorisation numbers GE/82/15 and GE/41/17, according to the guidelines and regulations issued by the Swiss Federal Veterinary Office.

P. berghei maintenance and production

P. berghei ANKA strain-derived [45] clone 2.34 [46] together with derived transgenic lines Kin8B-KO [24], SAS6L-GFP [36], and MyoB-GFP [37] were grown and maintained in CD1 outbred mice as previously described [47]. Moreover, 6- to 10-week-old mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (France), and females were used for all experiments. Mice were specific pathogen free (including Mycoplasma pulmonis) and subjected to regular pathogen monitoring by sentinel screening. They were housed in individually ventilated cages furnished with a cardboard mouse house and Nestlet, maintained at 21 ± 2°C under a 12-hour light/dark cycle, and given commercially prepared autoclaved dry rodent diet and water ad libitum. The parasitaemia of infected animals was determined by microscopy of methanol-fixed and Giemsa-stained thin blood smears.

Schizonts were purified from overnight in vitro culture (RPMI1640 with 25 mM glutamine, HEPES + 10 mM NaHCO₃, 20% foetal bovine serum and 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin) on a Histodenz cushion made from 55% of the Histodenz stock and 45% PBS. Parasites were harvested from the interface and collected by centrifugation at 500 g for 3 minutes. Gametocyte production and purification was performed as previously described [47]. Parasites were grown in mice that had been phenyl hydrazine-treated 3 days before infection. One day after infection, sulfadiazine (20 mg/L) was added in the drinking water to eliminate asexually replicating parasites. For gametocyte purification, parasites were harvested in suspended animation medium (SA; RPMI 1640 containing 25 mM HEPES, 5% fetal calf serum [FCS], 4 mM sodium bicarbonate, pH 7.20) and separated from uninfected erythrocytes on a Histodenz cushion made from 48% of a Histodenz stock (27.6% [w/v] Histodenz [Sigma/Alere Technologies, Germany] in 5.0 mM TrisHCl, 3.0 mM KCl, 0.3 mM EDTA, pH 7.20) and 52% SA, final pH 7.2. Gametocytes were harvested from the interface. Gametocytes were activated in RPMI 1640 containing 25 mM HEPES, 4 mM sodium bicarbonate, 5% FCS, 100 μM xanthurenic acid, pH 7.4).

For western blot analyses, gametocytes were lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 8, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS), supplemented with 1 × protease inhibitor cocktail (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life Technologies Europe BV) on ice for 30 minutes. Proteins were detected using the primary antibodies α-tubulin (1:1,000) and α-PolyE (1:2,000) and secondary antibodies α-mouse (1:3,000) and α-rabbit (1:3,000). Ookinete cultures were performed as previously described [40]. Parasites were maintained in phenyl hydrazine-treated mice. Ookinetes were produced in vitro by adding 1 volume of high gametocytaemia blood in 30 volumes of ookinete medium (RPMI1640 containing 25 mM HEPES, 10% FCS, 100 μM xanthurenic acid, pH 7.5) and incubated at 19°C for 18 to 24 hours. Ookinetes were purified using paramagnetic anti-mouse IgG beads (Life Technologies Europe BV) coated with anti-p28 mouse monoclonal antibody (13.1).

P. falciparum culture

P. falciparum strain 3D7, a clone from the NF54 isolate [48], was grown in human erythrocytes in RPMI-1640 medium with glutamine (Gibco, Life Technologies Europe BV), 0.2% sodium bicarbonate, 25 mM HEPES, 0.2% glucose, 5% human serum, and 0.1% Albumax II (Life Technologies Europe BV). Parasite cultures were kept synchronised by double sorbitol treatments. Late stage parasites were purified from synchronous cultures using Percoll (GE Healthcare, Sigma, Germany).

U-ExM

Ookinetes and schizonts were centrifuged at 1,000 rpm during 5 minutes at 24°C and resuspended in 500 μL of PBS 1X. Parasites were sedimented on poly-D-lysine (A-003-E, Sigma) coverslips (150 μL/coverslip) during 10 minutes at room temperature (RT). To stop the activation of the gametocytes, the same protocol was used but keeping the parasites at 4°C. Then parasites were fixed in −20°C methanol during 7 minutes and prepared for U-ExM as previously published [14]. Briefly, coverslips were incubated for 5 hours in 2X 1.4% AA/ 2% FA mix at 37°C prior gelation in APS/Temed/Monomer solution (19% Sodium Acrylate; 10% AA; 0,1% BIS-AA in PBS 10X) during 1 hour at 37°C. Then denaturation was performed during 1 hour and 30 minutes at 95°C [49]. After denaturation, gels were incubated in ddH2O at RT during 30 minutes. Next, gels were incubated in ddH2O overnight for complete expansion. The following day, gels were washed in PBS twice for 15 minutes to remove excess water before incubation with primary antibody solution. They were stained 3 hours at 37°C with primary antibodies against PolyE (1:500), α-tubulin and β-tubulin (1:200), centrin (1:300), anti-GFP (1:250). Gel were washed 3 × 10 minutes in PBS-Tween 0.1% prior incubation with secondary antibodies (anti-mouse Alexa 568, Anti-mouse 488, anti-rabbit Alexa 488, Anti-guinea pig Alexa 568–1:400) during 3 hours at 37°C and 3 washes of 10 minutes in PBS-Tween. Overnight, a second round of expansion was done in water before imaging.

NHS-ester staining

Directly after antibody staining, the gel where incubated in NHS Ester (Thermo Fisher Scientific catalog number: 46402) and diluted at 10 μg/mL in PBS for 1 hour and 30 minutes at RT on a rocking platform. The gels where then washed 3 times for 15 minutes with PBS-Tween 0.1% then expanded overnight in ultrapure water.

Imaging was performed on a Leica Thunder inverted microscope (Germany) using 63X 1.4NA oil objective with Small Volume Computational Clearing mode to obtain deconvolved images. Three-dimensional stacks were acquired with 0.21 μm z-interval and x,y pixel size of 105 nm. Images were analysed and merged using ImageJ software.

Confocal microscopy was performed on a Leica TCS SP8 (Germany) with a 63×/1.4-NA (numerical aperture) oil immersion objective, using the HyVolution mode20 to generate deconvolved images, with the following parameters: “HyVolution Grade” at max resolution, Huygens Essential as “Approach,” water as “Mounting Medium,” and Best Resolution as “Strategy.”

Measurements

The diameter and distance between the ring of tubulin and the microtubules were always measured from dual staining experiments. After applying a maximum projection of the stack, we used the homemade plug-in pickCentrioleDim on Fiji software developed by M. Le Guennec to measure the peak-to-peak distance for each fluorescent channel for each parasite. The expansion factor of each gel was after applied to the value to obtain the real distance.

To measure the length of microtubules, we used Fiji to draw a line to define our region of interest (ROI) following tubulin staining and determined its associated length. The expansion factor of each gel was after applied to the value to obtain the real size.

Transmission electron microscopy

EM was performed as previously described [40]. RBCs infected with P. berghei extracellular ookinetes were fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences, United States of America) and 2.0% paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 10 mM PBS pH 7.4 for 1 hour at room temperature. Pelleted cells were embedded in 3% low-melted agarose (Eurobio, France) in 10 mM PBS and dissected in small pieces in order of easier handling and to prevent loss of cells during subsequent processing steps. After extensive washing (5 × 5 minutes) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH7.4 (Sigma), samples were postfixed with 1% osmium tetroxide (Electron Microscopy Sciences) reduced with 1.5% ferrocyanide (Sigma) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 for 1 hour at room temperature, followed by postfixation with 1% osmium tetroxide alone (Electron Microscopy Sciences) in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer pH 7.4 for 1 hour at room temperature. After washing with double distilled water (2 × 5 minutes) samples were en-block post-stained with 1% aqueous uranyl acetate (Electron Microscopy Sciences) for 1 hour at room temperature. Samples were then washed with double distilled water for 5 minutes and dehydrated in graded ethanol series (2 × 50%, 1 × 70%, 1 × 90%, 1 × 95%, and 2 × 100% for 3 minutes each wash). Samples were then infiltrated at room temperature with Durcupan resin (Sigma) mixed 100% ethanol at 1:2, 1:1, and 2:1 for 30 minutes each step, followed by fresh pure Durcupan resin for 2 × 30 minutes and transferred into fresh pure Durcupan resin for 2 hours. Finally, samples were embedded in fresh Durcupan resin filled small thin-wall PCR tubes and polymerised and cured at 60°C for 24 hours. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were cut with Leica Ultracut UCT microtome (Leica Microsystems, Germany) and diamond knife (DiATOME) and collected onto 2 mm single slot copper grids (Electron Microscopy Sciences) coated with 1% Pioloform plastic support film. Sections were then examined and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images collected using Tecnai 20 TEM (FEI) electron microscope operating at 80 kV and equipped with a side-mounted MegaView III CCD camera (Olympus Soft Imaging Systems, Germany) controlled by iTEM acquisition software (Olympus Soft Imaging Systems).

Supporting information

S1 Data. Raw data and statistical analyses for Figs 1H, 3C, 3F, 3I–3K, 4D, 4E, 4H–4J and 5I and S1H, S3B–S3E and S4E Figs.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(72.3KB, xlsx)}

S2 Data. Original scans of the western blot shown in S3 Fig.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(9.4MB, tif)}

S1 Fig. Measurements to assess the isotropicity of U-ExM expanded specimens.

Measurement skills to evaluate parasite size before and after expansion. Dotted lines represent the ROI used for the measurements for each parasite stage: microgametocytes, non-expanded (A), and expanded (B); ookinetes, non-expanded (C), and expanded (D); schizonts, non-expanded (E), and expanded (F). Scale bar: 5 μm. (G) Ratio between the size before and after expansion and the average expansion factor (gel size/coverslip size). Averages and standard deviations are given in the table from at least 3 independent experiments for each stage. Related to Fig 1 (n are indicated in the legend of Fig 1H). (H) Plot profile of the ROI extracted from 1 ookinete image stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) showing the resolution limit of U-ExM. The example of ROI used for this plot profile is indicated in green on panel D. The average distance between 2 microtubules is of 137 nm +/− 17. The corresponding raw data can be found in S1 Data. ROI, region of interest; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(988.5KB, tiff)}

S2 Fig. Gallery of U-ExM expanded WT Plasmodium microgametocytes.

Expanded WT microgametocytes and gametes stained for α- and β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and PolyE (green, Alexa 488). Arrows show apparent differences between tubulin and PolyE staining. The white asterisk denotes fully formed axonemes. The white arrowhead indicates an exflagellated gamete. Scale bar: 5 μm. U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy; WT, wild-type.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.1MB, tiff)}

S3 Fig. Quantification of polyglutamylated tubulin in expanded microgametocytes.

(A) Wide-field representative image of an expanded microgametocyte stained for α- and β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and PolyE (green, Alexa 488). White arrows (1, 2, 3) indicate the position and orientation of the plot profiles shown in B to D. (B–D) Plot profiles across axonemes and tubulin structures/MTs showing a higher level of PolyE signal in complete axonemes in comparison with tubulin structures/microtubules (MT). (E) Western blot analysis showing tubulin and polyglutamylated tubulin in WT and P. berghei Kin8B-KO gametocytes 15 minutes post-activation by XA. The histograms show the relative values from 3 independent biological replicates. The raw data for B, C, D, and E can be found in S1 Data and the original scans in S2 Data, respectively. MT, microtubule; WT, wild-type.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.5MB, tiff)}

S4 Fig. NHS-ester staining coupled with U-ExM of P. berghei schizonts.

(A–C) Merge wide-field image (A) of an expanded schizont stained for NHS-ester (grey) (B) and α- and β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) (C). Arrowheads indicate the position of the APR seen as a grey ring. Dotted square boxes corresponds to the insets. Scale bar: 4 μm. (D) Confocal image of a free expanded merozoite stained with NHS-ester (grey) and α- and β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568). The arrowhead indicates the position of the APR seen as a grey ring. Scale bar: 2 μm. (E) Plot profile along the dotted line in D. Note that the measured APR have an average diameter of 183 nm +/ 12 (n = 13). The corresponding raw data can be found in S1 Data. APR, apical polar ring; NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.5MB, tiff)}

S5 Fig. U-ExM of WT Plasmodium ookinetes.

(A) Representative confocal image of WT ookinete expanded using the U-ExM protocol and stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and PolyE (green, Alexa 488). The 2 channels are represented independently. Scale bar: 5 μm. (B) Representative gallery of confocal images of WT ookinetes. Ookinetes were expanded using the U-ExM protocol and stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and PolyE (green, Alexa 488). Scale bar: 5 μm. Insets show the delineated white-boxed region. The ATR is not polyglutamylated, while the subpellicular microtubules are PolyE positive. ATR, apical tubulin ring; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy; WT, wild-type.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.8MB, tiff)}

S6 Fig. The ATR is composed of both α- and β-tubulin.

(A, B) Representative wide-field images of WT ookinete expanded using the U-ExM protocol and stained for α- (A) or β- (B) tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568). Scale bar: 2 μm. ATR, apical tubulin ring; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy; WT, wild-type.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1MB, tiff)}

S7 Fig. U-ExM of expanded GCβ⁻ Plasmodium ookinetes.

Representative confocal images of a GCβ⁻ ookinete mutant. Ookinetes were expanded using the U-ExM protocol and stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and PolyE (green, Alexa 488). Scale bar: 5 μm. The ATR is closely associated with the APR in contrast with WT ookinetes. APR, apical polar ring; ATR, apical tubulin ring; U-ExM, ultrastructure expansion microscopy; WT, wild-type.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.2MB, tiff)}

S8 Fig. NHS-ester staining of expanded ookinetes.

(A–C) Representative confocal image of an expanded ookinete stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and NHS-ester (grey). Merge (A), α/β-tubulin staining (B) and NHS-staining (C). Scale bar: 5 μm. NHS-ester staining reveals the position of the collar and the nucleus. Microtubules are only weakly detected, and micronemes are not stained by NHS-ester in contrast with the collar. NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.5MB, tiff)}

S1 Video

Three-dimensional rendering of an expanded ookinete stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and NHS-ester (grey). NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide.

(MOV)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, mov)}

S1 Table. Antibodies and parasite lines used in this study.

All cell lines as well as primary and secondary antibodies used in this study are listed, including the dilution used, the source or reference, and the catalogue number.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.2KB, docx)}

Acknowledgments

We thank the BioImaging Center at Unige as well as Philippe Bastin, Linda Kohl, Nicolas Dos Santos Pacheco, Julien Guizetti, and Nikolai Klena for critical reading of the manuscript and insightful comments. We also would like to thank Rita Tewari for generously sharing the P. berghei Kin8B-KO, SAS6L-GFP, and MyoB-GFP lines.

Abbreviations

APR: apical polar ring
ATR: apical tubulin ring
EM: electron microscopy
FCS: fetal calf serum
GCβ: guanylyl cyclase beta
GFP: green fluorescent protein
IFA: immunofluorescence assay
IMC: inner membrane complex
MTOC: microtubule organising centre
NHS: N-hydroxysuccinimide
PKG: protein kinase G
ROI: region of interest
RT: room temperature
SAS6L: SAS-6-like
SIM: structured illumination microscopy
STED: stimulated emission depletion
TEM: transmission electron microscopy
U-ExM: ultrastructure expansion microscopy

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) PP00P3_187198 attributed to PG, BSSGI0_155852 and 31003A_179321 to MB, and by the European Research Council ERC ACCENT StG 715289 attributed to PG. MB is an INSERM investigator. MB and PG are EMBO young investigators. EB is supported by an EMBO long-term fellowship (ALTF-284-2019). BM is funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Grant agreement no. 695596. VH is funded by the European Research Council ERC ACCENT StG 715289 and PG by the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) PP00P3_187198. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

1.Adl SM, Leander BS, Simpson AGB, Archibald JM, Anderson OR, Bass D, et al. Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):684–9. 10.1080/10635150701494127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
2.Morrissette NS, Sibley LD. Cytoskeleton of apicomplexan parasites. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(1):21–38. 10.1128/mmbr.66.1.21-38.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
3.Frénal K, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M, Soldati-Favre D. Gliding motility powers invasion and egress in Apicomplexa. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(11):645–60. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
4.Bannister LH, Hopkins JM, Fowler RE, Krishna S, Mitchell GH. Ultrastructure of rhoptry development in Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic schizonts. Parasitology. 2000;121(3):273–87. 10.1017/s0031182099006320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
5.Hanssen E, Dekiwadia C, Riglar DT, Rug M, Lemgruber L, Cowman AF, et al. Electron tomography of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites reveals core cellular events that underpin erythrocyte invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15(9):1457–72. 10.1111/cmi.12132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
6.Hu K, Roos DS, Murray JM. A novel polymer of tubulin forms the conoid of Toxoplasma gondii. J Cell Biol. 2002;156(6):1039–50. 10.1083/jcb.200112086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7.Levine ND. The Protozoan Phylum Apicomplexa. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1988. 10.1201/9781351076104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
8.Mehlhorn H, Peters W, Haberkorn A. The formation of kinetes and oocysts in Plasmodium gallinaceum and considerations on phylogenetic relationships between Haemosporidia, Piroplasmida and other Coccidia. Protistologica. 1980;16:135–54. [Google Scholar]
9.Dos Santos Pacheco N, Tosetti N, Koreny L, Waller RF, Soldati-Favre D. Evolution, Composition, Assembly, and Function of the Conoid in Apicomplexa. Trends Parasitol. 2020. 10.1016/j.pt.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
10.De Niz M, Burda P-C, Kaiser G, del Portillo HA, Spielmann T, Frischknecht F, et al. Progress in imaging methods: insights gained into Plasmodium biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(1):37–54. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
11.Heine J, Reuss M, Harke B, D’Este E, Sahl SJ, Hell SW. Adaptive-illumination STED nanoscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(37):9797–802. 10.1073/pnas.1708304114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
12.Schloetel J-G, Heine J, Cowman AF, Pasternak M. Guided STED nanoscopy enables super-resolution imaging of blood stage malaria parasites. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4674. 10.1038/s41598-019-40718-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
13.Mehnert A-K, Simon CS, Guizetti J. Immunofluorescence staining protocol for STED nanoscopy of Plasmodium-infected red blood cells. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2019;229:47–52. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2019.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
14.Gambarotto D, Zwettler FU, Le Guennec M, Schmidt-Cernohorska M, Fortun D, Borgers S, et al. Imaging cellular ultrastructures using expansion microscopy (U-ExM). Nat Methods. 2019;16(1):71–4. 10.1038/s41592-018-0238-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
15.Pavlou G, Touquet B, Vigetti L, Renesto P, Bougdour A, Debarre D, et al. Coupling Polar Adhesion with Traction, Spring, and Torque Forces Allows High-Speed Helical Migration of the Protozoan Parasite Toxoplasma. ACS Nano. 2020;14(6):7121–39. 10.1021/acsnano.0c01893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
16.Tosetti N, Dos Santos Pacheco N, Bertiaux E, Maco B, Bournonville L, Hamel V, et al. Essential function of the alveolin network in the subpellicular microtubules and conoid assembly in Toxoplasma gondii. Elife. 2020;9:e56635. 10.7554/eLife.56635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
17.Garnham PCC, Bird RG, Baker JR. Electron microscope studies of motile stages of malaria parasites V. Exflagellation in Plasmodium, Hepatocystis and Leucocytozoon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1967;61(1):58–68. 10.1016/0035-9203(67)90054-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
18.Sinden RE, Canning EU, Spain B. Gametogenesis and fertilization in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis: a transmission electron microscope study. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976;193(1110):55–76. 10.1098/rspb.1976.0031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
19.Sinden RE, Smalley ME. Gametocytogenesis of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro: the cell-cycle. Parasitology. 2009;79(2):277–96. 10.1017/S003118200005335X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
20.Mitchell DR. Speculations on the evolution of 9+2 organelles and the role of central pair microtubules. Biol Cell. 2004;96(9):691–6. 10.1016/j.biolcel.2004.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
21.Avidor-Reiss T, Leroux Michel R. Shared and Distinct Mechanisms of Compartmentalized and Cytosolic Ciliogenesis. Curr Biol. 2015;25(23):R1143–R50. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
22.Briggs LJ, Davidge JA, Wickstead B, Ginger ML, Gull K. More than one way to build a flagellum: comparative genomics of parasitic protozoa. Curr Biol. 2004;14(15):R611–R2. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
23.Sinden RE, Talman A, Marques SR, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE. The flagellum in malarial parasites. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(4):491–500. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
24.Zeeshan M, Ferguson DJ, Abel S, Burrrell A, Rea E, Brady D, et al. Kinesin-8B controls basal body function and flagellum formation and is key to malaria transmission. Life Sci Alliance. 2019;2(4) (pii):2/4/e201900488. 10.26508/lsa.201900488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
25.Depoix D, Marques S, Ferguson D, Duguet T, Vucanovic T, Sinden R, et al. An essential role of Plasmodium berghei kinesin 8 in axoneme assembly and male gametogenesis. Cilia. 2015;4(Suppl 1):P46–P. 10.1186/2046-2530-4-S1-P46 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
26.Kubo T, Yanagisawa HA, Yagi T, Hirono M, Kamiya R. Tubulin polyglutamylation regulates axonemal motility by modulating activities of inner-arm dyneins. Curr Biol. 2010;20(5):441–5. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
27.Gerald N, Mahajan B, Kumar S. Mitosis in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10(4):474–82. 10.1128/EC.00314-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
28.Backer CB, Gutzman JH, Pearson CG, Cheeseman IM. CSAP localizes to polyglutamylated microtubules and promotes proper cilia function and zebrafish development. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(11):2122–230. 10.1091/mbc.E11-11-0931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
29.Koreny L, Zeeshan M, Barylyuk K, Tromer EC, van Hooff JJE, Brady D, et al. Molecular characterization of the conoid complex in Toxoplasma reveals its conservation in all apicomplexans, including Plasmodium species. PLoS Biol. 2021;19(3):e3001081. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
30.Bounkeua V, Li F, Vinetz JM. In vitro generation of Plasmodium falciparum ookinetes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(6):1187–94. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
31.Wang X, Qian P, Cui H, Yao L, Yuan J. A protein palmitoylation cascade regulates microtubule cytoskeleton integrity in Plasmodium. EMBO J. 2020;39(13):e104168. 10.15252/embj.2019104168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
32.Kan A, Tan YH, Angrisano F, Hanssen E, Rogers KL, Whitehead L, et al. Quantitative analysis of Plasmodium ookinete motion in three dimensions suggests a critical role for cell shape in the biomechanics of malaria parasite gliding motility. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(5):734–50. 10.1111/cmi.12283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
33.Deligianni E, Silmon de Monerri NC, McMillan PJ, Bertuccini L, Superti F, Manola M, et al. Essential role of Plasmodium perforin-like protein 4 in ookinete midgut passage. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201651–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
34.Sinden RE, Hartley RH, Winger L. The development of Plasmodium ookinetes in vitro: an ultrastructural study including a description of meiotic division. Parasitology. 1985;91:227–44. 10.1017/s0031182000057334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
35.de Leon JC, Scheumann N, Beatty W, Beck JR, Tran JQ, Yau C, et al. A SAS-6-like protein suggests that the Toxoplasma conoid complex evolved from flagellar components. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12(7):1009–19. 10.1128/EC.00096-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
36.Wall RJ, Roques M, Katris NJ, Koreny L, Stanway RR, Brady D, et al. SAS6-like protein in Plasmodium indicates that conoid-associated apical complex proteins persist in invasive stages within the mosquito vector. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28604. 10.1038/srep28604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
37.Yusuf NA, Green JL, Wall RJ, Knuepfer E, Moon RW, Schulte-Huxel C, et al. The Plasmodium Class XIV Myosin, MyoB, Has a Distinct Subcellular Location in Invasive and Motile Stages of the Malaria Parasite and an Unusual Light Chain. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(19):12147–64. 10.1074/jbc.M115.637694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
38.Graindorge A, Frénal K, Jacot D, Salamun J, Marq JB, Soldati-Favre D. The Conoid Associated Motor MyoH Is Indispensable for Toxoplasma gondii Entry and Exit from Host Cells. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(1):e1005388. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
39.Brochet M, Collins MO, Smith TK, Thompson E, Sebastian S, Volkmann K, et al. Phosphoinositide metabolism links cGMP-dependent protein kinase G to essential Ca²⁺ signals at key decision points in the life cycle of malaria parasites. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(3):e1001806. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
40.Fang H, Gomes AR, Klages N, Pino P, Maco B, Walker EM, et al. Epistasis studies reveal redundancy among calcium-dependent protein kinases in motility and invasion of malaria parasites. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4248. 10.1038/s41467-018-06733-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
41.Moon RW, Taylor CJ, Bex C, Schepers R, Goulding D, Janse CJ, et al. A cyclic GMP signalling module that regulates gliding motility in a malaria parasite. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(9):e1000599. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
42.Hirai M, Arai M, Kawai S, Matsuoka H. PbGCbeta is essential for Plasmodium ookinete motility to invade midgut cell and for successful completion of parasite life cycle in mosquitoes. J Biochem. 2006;140(5):747–57. 10.1093/jb/mvj205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
43.Götz R, Kunz TC, Fink J, Solger F, Schlegel J, Seibel J, et al. Nanoscale imaging of bacterial infections by sphingolipid expansion microscopy. bioRxiv. 2020. 10.1038/s41467-020-19897-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
44.Karagiannis ED, Kang JS, Shin TW, Emenari A, Asano S, Lin L, et al. Expansion Microscopy of Lipid Membranes. bioRxiv. 2019:829903. 10.1101/829903 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
45.Vincke L, Lips M. Un nouveau Plasmodium d’un rongeur sauvage du Congo. Plasmodium berghei n.sp. Ann Soc Belg Med Trap. 1948;28:97–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
46.Billker O, Dechamps S, Tewari R, Wenig G, Franke-Fayard B, Brinkmann V. Calcium and a calcium-dependent protein kinase regulate gamete formation and mosquito transmission in a malaria parasite. Cell. 2004;117(4):503–14. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00449-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
47.Balestra AC, Zeeshan M, Rea E, Pasquarello C, Brusini L, Mourier T, et al. A divergent cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase complex controls the atypical replication of a malaria parasite during gametogony and transmission. Elife. 2020;9:e56474. 10.7554/eLife.56474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
48.Walliker D, Quakyi IA, Wellems TE, McCutchan TF, Szarfman A, London WT, et al. Genetic analysis of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Science. 1987;236(4809):1661–6. 10.1126/science.3299700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
49.Le Guennec M, Klena N, Gambarotto D, Laporte MH, Tassin AM, van den Hoek H, et al. A helical inner scaffold provides a structural basis for centriole cohesion. Sci Adv. 2020;6(7):eaaz4137. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 11;19(3):e3001020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020.r001

Author response to previous submission

8 Oct 2020

Attachment

Submitted filename: 108700_1_rebuttal_1882459_qhjlvn.pdf

Click here for additional data file.^{(873KB, pdf)}

PLoS Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020.r002

Decision Letter 0

Paula Jauregui, PhD

30 Oct 2020

Dear Dr. Hamel,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Expansion Microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid" for consideration as a Research Article by PLOS Biology.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise and I am writing to let you know that we will accept it without further review, but we will need to do some reporting and formatting checks first.

For this, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please, delete the part where you say this is an update article, since it is not updating a previous PLOS Biology paper and then our system will be categorizing this manuscript wrong.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by Nov 01 2020 11:59PM.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Paula

---

Paula Jauregui, PhD,

Associate Editor

PLOS Biology

PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 11;19(3):e3001020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020.r003

Author response to Decision Letter 0

3 Nov 2020

Attachment

Submitted filename: 108700_1_rebuttal_1882459_qhjlvn.pdf

Click here for additional data file.^{(873KB, pdf)}

PLoS Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020.r004

Decision Letter 1

Paula Jauregui, PhD

5 Nov 2020

Dear Dr. Hamel,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Expansion Microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid" for consideration as a Research Article by PLOS Biology. This paper was a Review Commons paper that was evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors as well as by an Academic Editor with relevant expertise.

We're delighted to let you know that we're editorially satisfied with your manuscript. However before we can formally accept your paper and consider it "in press", we also need to ensure that your article conforms to our guidelines. A member of our team will be in touch shortly with a set of requests. As we can't proceed until these requirements are met, your swift response will help prevent delays to publication. Please also make sure to address the data and other policy-related requests noted at the end of this email.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following:

- a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests, if applicable

- a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable)

- a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript.

*Copyediting*

Upon acceptance of your article, your final files will be copyedited and typeset into the final PDF. While you will have an opportunity to review these files as proofs, PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling or significant scientific errors. Therefore, please take this final revision time to assess and make any remaining major changes to your manuscript.

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Paula

---

Paula Jauregui, PhD,

Associate Editor,

pjaureguionieva@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY:

You may be aware of the PLOS Data Policy, which requires that all data be made available without restriction: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability. For more information, please also see this editorial: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797

Note that we do not require all raw data. Rather, we ask that all individual quantitative observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures and results of your paper be made available in one of the following forms:

1) Supplementary files (e.g., excel). Please ensure that all data files are uploaded as 'Supporting Information' and are invariably referred to (in the manuscript, figure legends, and the Description field when uploading your files) using the following format verbatim: S1 Data, S2 Data, etc. Multiple panels of a single or even several figures can be included as multiple sheets in one excel file that is saved using exactly the following convention: S1_Data.xlsx (using an underscore).

2) Deposition in a publicly available repository. Please also provide the accession code or a reviewer link so that we may view your data before publication.

Regardless of the method selected, please ensure that you provide the individual numerical values that underlie the summary data displayed in the following figure panels as they are essential for readers to assess your analysis and to reproduce it: Figures 1H, 3C, 3F, 3I, 3J, 3K, 4D, 4E, 4H, 4I, 4J, 5I, Supplementary figures 1H, 3B, 3C, 3D, 3E, and 4E.

NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values).

Please also ensure that figure legends in your manuscript include information on where the underlying data can be found, and ensure your supplemental data file/s has a legend.

Please ensure that your Data Statement in the submission system accurately describes where your data can be found.

------------------------------------------------------------------------

BLOT AND GEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

For manuscripts submitted on or after 1st July 2019, we require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare and upload them now. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

------------------------------------------------------------------------

OTHER REMARKS:

Please, remove the data in the system where you say that this is an Update Article. This is only applicable for papers updating Articles published at PLOS Biology.

Please, remove any priority claims such as on page 10 "highlight for the first time". We consider that this is not necessary to highlight your work.

PLoS Biol. 2021 Mar 11;19(3):e3001020. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020.r005

Author response to Decision Letter 1

24 Nov 2020

Attachment

Submitted filename: 108700_1_rebuttal_1882459_qhjlvn.pdf

Click here for additional data file.^{(873KB, pdf)}

PLoS Biol. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001020.r006

Decision Letter 2

Paula Jauregui, PhD

21 Jan 2021

Dear Dr. Hamel,

I am writing concerning your manuscript submitted to PLOS Biology, entitled “Expansion Microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid.”

We have now completed our final technical checks and have approved your submission for publication. You will shortly receive a letter of formal acceptance from the editor.

Kind regards,

PLOS Biology

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Data. Raw data and statistical analyses for Figs 1H, 3C, 3F, 3I–3K, 4D, 4E, 4H–4J and 5I and S1H, S3B–S3E and S4E Figs.

(XLSX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(72.3KB, xlsx)}

S2 Data. Original scans of the western blot shown in S3 Fig.

(TIF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(9.4MB, tif)}

S1 Fig. Measurements to assess the isotropicity of U-ExM expanded specimens.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(988.5KB, tiff)}

S2 Fig. Gallery of U-ExM expanded WT Plasmodium microgametocytes.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.1MB, tiff)}

S3 Fig. Quantification of polyglutamylated tubulin in expanded microgametocytes.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.5MB, tiff)}

S4 Fig. NHS-ester staining coupled with U-ExM of P. berghei schizonts.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1.5MB, tiff)}

S5 Fig. U-ExM of WT Plasmodium ookinetes.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.8MB, tiff)}

S6 Fig. The ATR is composed of both α- and β-tubulin.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(1MB, tiff)}

S7 Fig. U-ExM of expanded GCβ⁻ Plasmodium ookinetes.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(3.2MB, tiff)}

S8 Fig. NHS-ester staining of expanded ookinetes.

(TIFF)

Click here for additional data file.^{(2.5MB, tiff)}

S1 Video

Three-dimensional rendering of an expanded ookinete stained for α/β-tubulin (magenta, Alexa 568) and NHS-ester (grey). NHS, N-hydroxysuccinimide.

(MOV)

Click here for additional data file.^{(13.3MB, mov)}

S1 Table. Antibodies and parasite lines used in this study.

All cell lines as well as primary and secondary antibodies used in this study are listed, including the dilution used, the source or reference, and the catalogue number.

(DOCX)

Click here for additional data file.^{(14.2KB, docx)}

Attachment

Submitted filename: 108700_1_rebuttal_1882459_qhjlvn.pdf

Click here for additional data file.^{(873KB, pdf)}

Attachment

Submitted filename: 108700_1_rebuttal_1882459_qhjlvn.pdf

Click here for additional data file.^{(873KB, pdf)}

Attachment

Submitted filename: 108700_1_rebuttal_1882459_qhjlvn.pdf

Click here for additional data file.^{(873KB, pdf)}

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

[pbio.3001020.ref001] 1.Adl SM, Leander BS, Simpson AGB, Archibald JM, Anderson OR, Bass D, et al. Diversity, Nomenclature, and Taxonomy of Protists. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):684–9. 10.1080/10635150701494127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref002] 2.Morrissette NS, Sibley LD. Cytoskeleton of apicomplexan parasites. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002;66(1):21–38. 10.1128/mmbr.66.1.21-38.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref003] 3.Frénal K, Dubremetz JF, Lebrun M, Soldati-Favre D. Gliding motility powers invasion and egress in Apicomplexa. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(11):645–60. 10.1038/nrmicro.2017.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref004] 4.Bannister LH, Hopkins JM, Fowler RE, Krishna S, Mitchell GH. Ultrastructure of rhoptry development in Plasmodium falciparum erythrocytic schizonts. Parasitology. 2000;121(3):273–87. 10.1017/s0031182099006320 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref005] 5.Hanssen E, Dekiwadia C, Riglar DT, Rug M, Lemgruber L, Cowman AF, et al. Electron tomography of Plasmodium falciparum merozoites reveals core cellular events that underpin erythrocyte invasion. Cell Microbiol. 2013;15(9):1457–72. 10.1111/cmi.12132 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref006] 6.Hu K, Roos DS, Murray JM. A novel polymer of tubulin forms the conoid of Toxoplasma gondii. J Cell Biol. 2002;156(6):1039–50. 10.1083/jcb.200112086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref007] 7.Levine ND. The Protozoan Phylum Apicomplexa. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1988. 10.1201/9781351076104 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref008] 8.Mehlhorn H, Peters W, Haberkorn A. The formation of kinetes and oocysts in Plasmodium gallinaceum and considerations on phylogenetic relationships between Haemosporidia, Piroplasmida and other Coccidia. Protistologica. 1980;16:135–54. [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref009] 9.Dos Santos Pacheco N, Tosetti N, Koreny L, Waller RF, Soldati-Favre D. Evolution, Composition, Assembly, and Function of the Conoid in Apicomplexa. Trends Parasitol. 2020. 10.1016/j.pt.2020.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref010] 10.De Niz M, Burda P-C, Kaiser G, del Portillo HA, Spielmann T, Frischknecht F, et al. Progress in imaging methods: insights gained into Plasmodium biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2017;15(1):37–54. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.158 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref011] 11.Heine J, Reuss M, Harke B, D’Este E, Sahl SJ, Hell SW. Adaptive-illumination STED nanoscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(37):9797–802. 10.1073/pnas.1708304114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref012] 12.Schloetel J-G, Heine J, Cowman AF, Pasternak M. Guided STED nanoscopy enables super-resolution imaging of blood stage malaria parasites. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):4674. 10.1038/s41598-019-40718-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref013] 13.Mehnert A-K, Simon CS, Guizetti J. Immunofluorescence staining protocol for STED nanoscopy of Plasmodium-infected red blood cells. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2019;229:47–52. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2019.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref014] 14.Gambarotto D, Zwettler FU, Le Guennec M, Schmidt-Cernohorska M, Fortun D, Borgers S, et al. Imaging cellular ultrastructures using expansion microscopy (U-ExM). Nat Methods. 2019;16(1):71–4. 10.1038/s41592-018-0238-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref015] 15.Pavlou G, Touquet B, Vigetti L, Renesto P, Bougdour A, Debarre D, et al. Coupling Polar Adhesion with Traction, Spring, and Torque Forces Allows High-Speed Helical Migration of the Protozoan Parasite Toxoplasma. ACS Nano. 2020;14(6):7121–39. 10.1021/acsnano.0c01893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref016] 16.Tosetti N, Dos Santos Pacheco N, Bertiaux E, Maco B, Bournonville L, Hamel V, et al. Essential function of the alveolin network in the subpellicular microtubules and conoid assembly in Toxoplasma gondii. Elife. 2020;9:e56635. 10.7554/eLife.56635 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref017] 17.Garnham PCC, Bird RG, Baker JR. Electron microscope studies of motile stages of malaria parasites V. Exflagellation in Plasmodium, Hepatocystis and Leucocytozoon. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1967;61(1):58–68. 10.1016/0035-9203(67)90054-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref018] 18.Sinden RE, Canning EU, Spain B. Gametogenesis and fertilization in Plasmodium yoelii nigeriensis: a transmission electron microscope study. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1976;193(1110):55–76. 10.1098/rspb.1976.0031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref019] 19.Sinden RE, Smalley ME. Gametocytogenesis of Plasmodium falciparum in vitro: the cell-cycle. Parasitology. 2009;79(2):277–96. 10.1017/S003118200005335X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref020] 20.Mitchell DR. Speculations on the evolution of 9+2 organelles and the role of central pair microtubules. Biol Cell. 2004;96(9):691–6. 10.1016/j.biolcel.2004.07.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref021] 21.Avidor-Reiss T, Leroux Michel R. Shared and Distinct Mechanisms of Compartmentalized and Cytosolic Ciliogenesis. Curr Biol. 2015;25(23):R1143–R50. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.11.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref022] 22.Briggs LJ, Davidge JA, Wickstead B, Ginger ML, Gull K. More than one way to build a flagellum: comparative genomics of parasitic protozoa. Curr Biol. 2004;14(15):R611–R2. 10.1016/j.cub.2004.07.041 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref023] 23.Sinden RE, Talman A, Marques SR, Wass MN, Sternberg MJE. The flagellum in malarial parasites. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2010;13(4):491–500. 10.1016/j.mib.2010.05.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref024] 24.Zeeshan M, Ferguson DJ, Abel S, Burrrell A, Rea E, Brady D, et al. Kinesin-8B controls basal body function and flagellum formation and is key to malaria transmission. Life Sci Alliance. 2019;2(4) (pii):2/4/e201900488. 10.26508/lsa.201900488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref025] 25.Depoix D, Marques S, Ferguson D, Duguet T, Vucanovic T, Sinden R, et al. An essential role of Plasmodium berghei kinesin 8 in axoneme assembly and male gametogenesis. Cilia. 2015;4(Suppl 1):P46–P. 10.1186/2046-2530-4-S1-P46 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref026] 26.Kubo T, Yanagisawa HA, Yagi T, Hirono M, Kamiya R. Tubulin polyglutamylation regulates axonemal motility by modulating activities of inner-arm dyneins. Curr Biol. 2010;20(5):441–5. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.12.058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref027] 27.Gerald N, Mahajan B, Kumar S. Mitosis in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Eukaryot Cell. 2011;10(4):474–82. 10.1128/EC.00314-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref028] 28.Backer CB, Gutzman JH, Pearson CG, Cheeseman IM. CSAP localizes to polyglutamylated microtubules and promotes proper cilia function and zebrafish development. Mol Biol Cell. 2012;23(11):2122–230. 10.1091/mbc.E11-11-0931 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref029] 29.Koreny L, Zeeshan M, Barylyuk K, Tromer EC, van Hooff JJE, Brady D, et al. Molecular characterization of the conoid complex in Toxoplasma reveals its conservation in all apicomplexans, including Plasmodium species. PLoS Biol. 2021;19(3):e3001081. 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001081 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref030] 30.Bounkeua V, Li F, Vinetz JM. In vitro generation of Plasmodium falciparum ookinetes. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2010;83(6):1187–94. 10.4269/ajtmh.2010.10-0433 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref031] 31.Wang X, Qian P, Cui H, Yao L, Yuan J. A protein palmitoylation cascade regulates microtubule cytoskeleton integrity in Plasmodium. EMBO J. 2020;39(13):e104168. 10.15252/embj.2019104168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref032] 32.Kan A, Tan YH, Angrisano F, Hanssen E, Rogers KL, Whitehead L, et al. Quantitative analysis of Plasmodium ookinete motion in three dimensions suggests a critical role for cell shape in the biomechanics of malaria parasite gliding motility. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(5):734–50. 10.1111/cmi.12283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref033] 33.Deligianni E, Silmon de Monerri NC, McMillan PJ, Bertuccini L, Superti F, Manola M, et al. Essential role of Plasmodium perforin-like protein 4 in ookinete midgut passage. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(8):e0201651–e. 10.1371/journal.pone.0201651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref034] 34.Sinden RE, Hartley RH, Winger L. The development of Plasmodium ookinetes in vitro: an ultrastructural study including a description of meiotic division. Parasitology. 1985;91:227–44. 10.1017/s0031182000057334 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref035] 35.de Leon JC, Scheumann N, Beatty W, Beck JR, Tran JQ, Yau C, et al. A SAS-6-like protein suggests that the Toxoplasma conoid complex evolved from flagellar components. Eukaryot Cell. 2013;12(7):1009–19. 10.1128/EC.00096-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref036] 36.Wall RJ, Roques M, Katris NJ, Koreny L, Stanway RR, Brady D, et al. SAS6-like protein in Plasmodium indicates that conoid-associated apical complex proteins persist in invasive stages within the mosquito vector. Sci Rep. 2016;6:28604. 10.1038/srep28604 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref037] 37.Yusuf NA, Green JL, Wall RJ, Knuepfer E, Moon RW, Schulte-Huxel C, et al. The Plasmodium Class XIV Myosin, MyoB, Has a Distinct Subcellular Location in Invasive and Motile Stages of the Malaria Parasite and an Unusual Light Chain. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(19):12147–64. 10.1074/jbc.M115.637694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref038] 38.Graindorge A, Frénal K, Jacot D, Salamun J, Marq JB, Soldati-Favre D. The Conoid Associated Motor MyoH Is Indispensable for Toxoplasma gondii Entry and Exit from Host Cells. PLoS Pathog. 2016;12(1):e1005388. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref039] 39.Brochet M, Collins MO, Smith TK, Thompson E, Sebastian S, Volkmann K, et al. Phosphoinositide metabolism links cGMP-dependent protein kinase G to essential Ca²⁺ signals at key decision points in the life cycle of malaria parasites. PLoS Biol. 2014;12(3):e1001806. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001806 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref040] 40.Fang H, Gomes AR, Klages N, Pino P, Maco B, Walker EM, et al. Epistasis studies reveal redundancy among calcium-dependent protein kinases in motility and invasion of malaria parasites. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):4248. 10.1038/s41467-018-06733-w [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref041] 41.Moon RW, Taylor CJ, Bex C, Schepers R, Goulding D, Janse CJ, et al. A cyclic GMP signalling module that regulates gliding motility in a malaria parasite. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5(9):e1000599. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000599 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref042] 42.Hirai M, Arai M, Kawai S, Matsuoka H. PbGCbeta is essential for Plasmodium ookinete motility to invade midgut cell and for successful completion of parasite life cycle in mosquitoes. J Biochem. 2006;140(5):747–57. 10.1093/jb/mvj205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref043] 43.Götz R, Kunz TC, Fink J, Solger F, Schlegel J, Seibel J, et al. Nanoscale imaging of bacterial infections by sphingolipid expansion microscopy. bioRxiv. 2020. 10.1038/s41467-020-19897-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref044] 44.Karagiannis ED, Kang JS, Shin TW, Emenari A, Asano S, Lin L, et al. Expansion Microscopy of Lipid Membranes. bioRxiv. 2019:829903. 10.1101/829903 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref045] 45.Vincke L, Lips M. Un nouveau Plasmodium d’un rongeur sauvage du Congo. Plasmodium berghei n.sp. Ann Soc Belg Med Trap. 1948;28:97–104. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref046] 46.Billker O, Dechamps S, Tewari R, Wenig G, Franke-Fayard B, Brinkmann V. Calcium and a calcium-dependent protein kinase regulate gamete formation and mosquito transmission in a malaria parasite. Cell. 2004;117(4):503–14. 10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00449-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref047] 47.Balestra AC, Zeeshan M, Rea E, Pasquarello C, Brusini L, Mourier T, et al. A divergent cyclin/cyclin-dependent kinase complex controls the atypical replication of a malaria parasite during gametogony and transmission. Elife. 2020;9:e56474. 10.7554/eLife.56474 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref048] 48.Walliker D, Quakyi IA, Wellems TE, McCutchan TF, Szarfman A, London WT, et al. Genetic analysis of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Science. 1987;236(4809):1661–6. 10.1126/science.3299700 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

[pbio.3001020.ref049] 49.Le Guennec M, Klena N, Gambarotto D, Laporte MH, Tassin AM, van den Hoek H, et al. A helical inner scaffold provides a structural basis for centriole cohesion. Sci Adv. 2020;6(7):eaaz4137. 10.1126/sciadv.aaz4137 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

PERMALINK

Expansion microscopy provides new insights into the cytoskeleton of malaria parasites including the conservation of a conoid

Eloïse Bertiaux

Aurélia C Balestra

Lorène Bournonville

Vincent Louvel

Bohumil Maco

Dominique Soldati-Favre

Mathieu Brochet

Paul Guichard

Virginie Hamel

Roles

Abstract

Introduction

Results

U-ExM is effective in diverse stages of the Plasmodium life cycle

Fig 1. U-ExM applied to Plasmodium.

U-ExM allows visualisation of axonemal microtubules and their polyglutamylation in fully reconstructed gametocytes

Fig 2. Axonemes formation in microgametocytes visualised by U-ExM.

U-ExM resolves the hemispindles and reveals a distinct organisation of subpellicular microtubules in P. falciparum and P. berghei schizonts

Fig 3. U-ExM resolves mitotic hemispindles and subpellicular microtubules in P. falciparum schizonts.

The P. berghei ookinete possesses a remnant conoid

Fig 4. Identification and characterisation of a conoid-like structure in P. berghei ookinetes.

Fig 5. U-ExM coupled with NHS-ester/Tubulin staining reveals the position of the ATR.

Discussion

Fig 6. Current models.

Material and methods

Ethics statement

P. berghei maintenance and production

P. falciparum culture

U-ExM

NHS-ester staining

Measurements

Transmission electron microscopy

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

Abbreviations

Data Availability

Funding Statement

References

Author response to previous submission

Decision Letter 0

Paula Jauregui, PhD

Roles

Author response to Decision Letter 0

Decision Letter 1

Paula Jauregui, PhD

Roles

Author response to Decision Letter 1

Decision Letter 2

Paula Jauregui, PhD

Roles

Associated Data

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

ACTIONS

PERMALINK

RESOURCES

Similar articles

Cited by other articles

Links to NCBI Databases