Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247277

A genomic variant of ALPK2 is associated with increased liver fibrosis risk in HIV/HCV coinfected women

Alec T McIntosh 1, Renhuizi Wei 1, Jaeil Ahn 2, Brad E Aouizerat 3, Seble G Kassaye 4, Michael H Augenbraun 5, Jennifer C Price 6, Audrey L French 7, Stephen J Gange 8, Kathryn M Anastos 9, Radoslav Goldman 1,10,11,*
Editor: Jason T Blackard12
PMCID: PMC7951908  PMID: 33705408

Abstract

HIV coinfection is associated with more rapid liver fibrosis progression in hepatitis C (HCV) infection. Recently, much work has been done to improve outcomes of liver disease and to identify targets for pharmacological intervention in coinfected patients. In this study, we analyzed clinical data of 1,858 participants from the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) to characterize risk factors associated with changes in the APRI and FIB-4 surrogate measurements for advanced fibrosis. We assessed 887 non-synonymous single nucleotide variants (nsSNV) in a subset of 661 coinfected participants for genetic associations with changes in liver fibrosis risk. The variants utilized produced amino acid substitutions that either altered an N-linked glycosylation (NxS/T) sequon or mapped to a gene related to glycosylation processes. Seven variants were associated with an increased likelihood of liver fibrosis. The most common variant, ALPK2 rs3809973, was associated with liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfected patients; individuals homozygous for the rare C allele displayed elevated APRI (0.61, 95% CI, 0.334 to 0.875) and FIB-4 (0.74, 95% CI, 0.336 to 1.144) relative to those coinfected women without the variant. Although warranting replication, ALPK2 rs3809973 may show utility to detect individuals at increased risk for liver disease progression.

Introduction

The emergence of highly active antiretroviral therapy has transitioned the once acutely fatal human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection to a chronic disease. However, the longer survival of persons living with HIV infection presents a new set of morbidities and increased risk for mortality [13]. Due to common modes of transmission, those infected with HIV are at higher risk of contracting hepatitis C virus (HCV). Accelerated progression of liver disease in HIV/HCV coinfected patients compared to those with HCV monoinfection is well documented and liver disease has become a leading cause of non-AIDS related death in coinfected individuals [4,5]. The pathogenesis of liver disease in coinfected individuals is multifactorial [6]. Despite substantial progress in identifying risk factors for liver disease progression in coinfected persons, our understanding of risk factors remains incomplete, with genomic factors among those that remain ill-defined. Even with the emergence of direct-acting HCV antivirals, the ability of these agents to regress fibrosis upon HCV clearance remains unclear [7] and the cost of treatment is often inaccessible to at-risk populations [8]. Taken together, these considerations document that liver fibrosis remains a challenge in coinfected and HCV monoinfected patients. In this study, we examined the impact of non-synonymous single nucleotide variants (nsSNV) affecting N-glycosylation both directly at the NxS/T sequons of proteins and indirectly through the enzymes and lectins of glycosylation-related pathways.

Glycosylation is one of the most common and structurally diverse protein modifications and affects protein synthesis, structure, and function [9]. Glycosylation enzymes or the glycoproteins they produce are involved in immune surveillance and host-pathogen interactions [10,11] as well as in the progression of viral liver disease [12]. To elucidate the impacts of glycosylation on the pathogenesis of fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfected patients, we focused on nsSNV affecting the NxS/T sequons required for the attachment of N-glycans to proteins and thus the potential to change the number of glycans on the protein surface [13,14]. The Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS) is a longitudinal natural history study of HIV infection that features a sufficient number of HIV/HCV coinfected participants and biomarkers of liver disease to evaluate the impact of risk factors for liver disease progression [15], including genetic risk factors [1618]. Given its longitudinal cohort design, the Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) [19] and the AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) [20] were collected in the WIHS cohort as noninvasive surrogate measures of hepatic fibrosis. These measures were used in lieu of serial tissue biopsy as the means with which to evaluate genetic risk factors in HIV/HCV coinfection [21]. A set of 887 nsSNV were extracted from a genome-wide association study performed in the WIHS cohort. Of these, 278 nsSNV produce an amino acid substitution that alters the potential glycosylation of target proteins by altering the number of N-glycans decorating a protein, which we analyzed in relation to surrogate biomarkers of liver fibrosis. Given that previous work demonstrated that genetic variation in glycosylation-related enzymes and lectins can alter kinetics and binding affinities respectively, the remaining 609 of 887 nsSNV were glycosylation-related proteins evaluated in relation to surrogate biomarkers of liver fibrosis in coinfected participants [22,23].

Methods

Ethics statement

The parent WIHS study and this sub-study conformed to the procedures for informed written consent approved by institutional review boards (IRB) at all sponsoring organizations and to human-experimentation guidelines set forth by the United States Department of Health and Human Services, and finally reviewed and approved by the local IRBs in the Baltimore/DC region. The IRBs at the Chicago site were Cook County CORE Center IRB, Cook County Health & Hospitals System IRB, Northwestern University IRB, Northwestern Memorial Hospital IRB, Rush University IRB, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Lukes IRB, University of Illinois at Chicago IRB. The IRBs at the Los Angeles/Southern California site were University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center IRB, Western IRB, University of Hawaii/Kapi’olani Health Research Institute IRB, University of Southern California IRB. The IRB at the New York Brooklyn site was SUNY Downstate Medical Center Institutional Review Board. The IRBs at the New York Bronx site were Albert Einstein College of Medicine IRB, Beth Israel IRB, Mt. Sinai Medical Center IRB. The IRBs at the San Francisco Bay Area site were Alameda Health System IRB, Sutter Health IRB, University of California, San Francisco IRB, California Committee for the Protection of Human Subjects (CPHS). The IRBs at the Washington District of Columbia site were Georgetown University Medical Center IRB, Howard University IRB, Inova Health Systems IRB, Montgomery County Health Department IRB, Whitman Walker Clinic IRB.

Study population

The WIHS is an active, multicenter prospective study of the natural history of HIV infection among women with or at risk for HIV-infection in the United States. Established in 1994, a total of 4,982 women (3,677 HIV-seropositive) have been enrolled. At semi-annual visits, participants completed socio-demographic and medical questionnaires, laboratory testing, and a limited physical examination. Data included in this analysis include age, race and ethnicity, continuous clinical measures of liver fibrosis (APRI and FIB-4), plasma HIV RNA viral titer, HCV infection status (at all visits), and HCV viral titer (at baseline only) [24]. HCV status was defined as “positive” when participants had both positive HCV antibody and detectable HCV RNA at their baseline visit. Those that were defined as “negative” had no detectable HCV antibody upon testing. Self-reported race and ethnicity was used to define four groups: “White” (non-Hispanic), “African American” (non-Hispanic), “Hispanic”, or “Other”. In addition to self-reported race and ethnicity, genomic estimates of ancestry were derived using principle component analysis of ancestry informative genetic markers [25].

Genotyping

Genotype data in WIHS was generated from genomic DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells using the Infinium Omni2.5 BeadChip (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA) [24]. Of the 10,141 genes (602 glycogene + 9,539 NxS/T-containing genes) known to exist in the human genome, data on 1,029 nsSNVs (698 glycogene + 331 NxS/T) spanning 660 genes (349 glycogene + 311 NxS/T) from 2,120 WIHS participants were available for analysis [13]. Of these 2,120 women, 262 participants were either HCV antibody positive in the absence of detectable HCV RNA (N = 156) or HCV serostatus was never assessed at baseline (N = 106) and therefore excluded (S1 Fig). Of the 331 NxS/T nsSNVs, 44 were mono-allelic (non-polymorphic) and therefore excluded. Among the 287 nsSNVs that remained, missing genotypes across 1,858 patients were imputed with the most common genotype for each nsSNVs (mean participants imputed per nsSNV±SD = 5±6.04). Of the 698 glycogene nsSNVs, 75 were monomorphic and excluded. Among the 623 nsSNVs that remained, missing genotypes across 1,858 patients were imputed with the most common genotype for each nsSNV (mean participants imputed per nsSNV±SD = 5±6.21). A minor allele frequency (MAF) threshold ≥0.001 (≥0.1%) was applied using the MAFs of the coinfected population (N = 661) to further isolate SNVs sufficiently frequent to allow for statistical analysis. Using this method, an additional 9 NxS/T and 14 glycogenes were eliminated from analysis. After applying all exclusion criteria, clinical and genotype (887 glycogene [609 nsSNV, 278 NxS/T nsSNV] spanning 564 genes) data were available for 1,858 women (S1 Fig). The nsSNV reference sequence identifiers (rsID), major (or common) and minor (or rare) alleles, and MAF across serotypes are provided as supplementary tables for the NxS/T (S1 Table) and glycogene (S2 Table) nsSNVs utilized in our analysis.

Serologic markers of fibrosis

Fibrosis-4 Index (FIB-4) and the AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI) were used as measures of hepatic fibrosis as described in previous literature [21]. For the FIB-4 index, scores <1.45 and >3.25 indicate a high negative and a high positive predictive value for advanced fibrosis respectively [19]. For APRI, scores <0.5 have a high negative predictive value for liver disease while scores >0.7 and >2 indicate a high positive predictive value for moderate and severe hepatic fibrosis respectively [20]. Genetic polymorphisms were independently analyzed against each continuous surrogate index (i.e., APRI, FIB-4) at baseline to identify variants with stronger associations that would manifest across both current clinical diagnostic resources.

Statistical analysis

For descriptive summaries, continuous variables were summarized using means and standard deviations while categorical variables were summarized using frequency counts and percentages. HIV and HCV RNA status were categorized into 4 serostatus groups: both HIV/HCV noninfected, HIV monoinfected, HCV monoinfected, and HIV/HCV coinfected. Distributions of APRI, FIB-4, and HIV RNA viral load among the four serostatus groups were summarized using descriptive statistics and were compared using chi-square analyses or one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). APRI and FIB-4 scores used for analysis were obtained at baseline visits (pre-2003) at a time prior to the broad use of HCV therapy. For each variant from the 278 NxS/T and 609 glycogene nsSNV that met inclusion criteria, a separate multiple variable linear regression model was constructed for the HIV/HCV coinfected patient population for continuous APRI and FIB-4 outcomes, respectively. Explanatory variables included each variant, age, race and ethnicity, HIV viral load, and HCV viral load where HIV and HCV viral load were normalized using log2(x+1) transformation. Model results were near indistinguishable when adjusted for either HCV viral load or HCV status. Genomic estimates of racial and ethnicity were estimated using principle component analysis of 185 ancestry informative markers (SNV) selected to differentiate major racial and ethnic groups in the cohort (i.e., European, African, Hispanic) [25] The first three principle components (PC1, PC2, PC3), which explain >90% variation, were utilized to adjust for genomic estimates of race and ethnicity in the aforementioned linear regression models. HIV and HCV viral load were normalized using log2(x+1) transformation. To reassure our findings were not sensitive to confounding factors of liver fibrosis, we performed a sensitivity analysis on the linear regression models with adjustment for additional factors including Hepatitis B (HBV) infection status (categorical variable; positive or negative for chronic infection by serology), participant reported alcohol usage (categorical variable; abstainers [0 drinks/week], mild users [1–7 drinks/week], or heavy users [>7 drinks/week]), and Body Mass Index (BMI, a surrogate marker for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)). The false discovery rate (FDR) was used to account for multiple testing (i.e., 887 linear regression each for FIB-4 and APRI). All reported p-values are two-sided, and SNV associations with FDR<0.05 were considered statistically significant. To investigate whether the impact of SNV varies across the four serogroups, we examined SNV*serostatus interactions and computed 95% confidence intervals for each SNV genotype*serostatus configuration. Statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA) and R version 3.3 (R Core Team, Vienna, Austria).

Results

Of the 75% of women who were HIV seropositive (1386 of 1858), 52% (n = 725) were HIV monoinfected and 48% (n = 661) were HIV/HCV coinfected (Table 1).

Table 1. Baseline population characteristics of patients by serostatus.

Variable Noninfected HIV-/HCV- Monoinfected HIV+/HCV- Monoinfected HIV-/HCV+ Coinfected HIV+/HCV+
Levels N = 368 N = 725 N = 104 N = 661 P
Age at BL, μ ± SD 29.6 ± 8.0 33.2 ± 7.4 39.2 ± 7.2 39.8 ± 6.2 <0.001
HIV load*, μ ± SD 0 11.3 ± 4.4 0 14.0 ± 3.8 <0.001
HCV load*, μ ± SD 0 0 19.1 ± 3.3 20.5 ± 2.8 <0.001
Albumin (g/dL), μ ± SD 4.2 ± 0.4 4.1 ± 0.4 4.3 ± 0.4 4.0 ± 0.5 <0.0001
Race, n(%)
Non-Hispanic White 47 (12.8) 69 (9.5) 13 (12.5) 111 (16.8) <0.001
Non-Hispanic A-A 205 (55.7) 400 (55.2) 63 (60.6) 416 (62.9)
Hispanic 101 (27.5) 227 (31.3) 23 (22.1) 123 (18.6)
Other 15 (4.1) 29 (4.0) 5 (4.8) 11 (1.7)
BMI, n(%)
<18.5: Underweight 8 (2.2) 17 (2.3) 2 (1.9) 26 (3.9) <0.001
18.5–24.9: Normal 128 (34.8) 237 (32.7) 33 (31.7) 275 (41.6)
25–29.9: Overweight 102 (27.7) 215 (29.7) 25 (24.0) 183 (27.7)
≥30: Obese I-III 121 (32.9) 249 (34.3) 37 (35.6) 138 (20.9)
NA 9 (2.5) 7 (1.0) 7 (6.7) 39 (5.9)
Alcohol, n(%)
Abstainer 143 (38.9) 387 (53.4) 41 (39.4) 304 (46.0) <0.001
Mild 169 (45.9) 280 (38.6) 34 (32.7) 222 (33.6)
Heavy 53 (14.4) 43 (5.9) 24 (23.1) 121 (18.3)
NA 3 (0.8) 15 (2.1) 5 (4.8) 14 (2.1)
APRI, n(%)
<0.5 367 (99.7) 633 (87.3) 64 (61.5) 267 (40.4) <0.001
0.5–0.7 0 39 (5.4) 13 (12.5) 135 (20.4)
>0.7 1 (0.3) 53 (7.3) 27 (26.0) 259 (39.2)
FIB-4, n(%)
<1.45 366 (99.5) 657 (90.6) 79 (76.0) 336 (50.8) <0.001
1.45–3.25 2 (0.5) 59 (8.1) 20 (19.2) 255 (38.6)
>3.25 0 9 (1.2) 5 (4.8) 70 (10.6)
HBV status, n(%)
Negative, Non-infected 248 (67.4) 457 (63.1) 39 (37.5) 147 (22.2) <0.001
Negative, Anti-HBc Only 8 (2.2) 40 (5.5) 28 (26.9) 256 (38.7)
Negative, Immunized 63 (17.1) 113 (15.6) 5 (4.8) 28 (4.2)
Negative, Resolution 41 (11.1) 99 (13.7) 32 (30.8) 217 (32.8)
Positive, Chronic Infection 4 (1.1) 15 (2.1) 0 13 (2.1)
NA 4 (1.1) 1 (0.07) 0 0
HIV treatment, n(%)
No therapy 0 290 (40.0) 0 252 (38.1) <0.001
Mono therapy 0 47 (6.5) 0 220 (33.3)
Combination therapy 0 88 (12.1) 0 161 (24.4)
HAART 0 300 (41.4) 0 26 (3.9)
NA 368 (100.0) 0 104 (100.0) 2 (0.3)

Percentages based off columns.

*Viral loads are log2 transformed (copies/mL).

Abbreviations: BL, Baseline; A-A, African-American; BMI, Body Mass Index; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy.

The remaining 25% of women (N = 472) were HCV/HIV noninfected and 22% (N = 104) were HCV monoinfected. The proportion of non-Hispanic African-Americans differed significantly between the four serogroups (P<0.001) (Table 1). Post-hoc contrasts indicate that, in comparison to non-Hispanic African Americans, Hispanics were less likely (OR = 0.66 [95% CI, 0.499 to 0.881], PFDR = 0.03) and non-Hispanic Whites were more likely (OR = 1.82 [95% CI, 1.272 to 2.609], PFDR = 0.006) to be in the coinfected serogroup as compared to the HIV monoinfected group. HCV-infected women were older on average (P<0.001) than those not infected with the virus (Table 1). Post-hoc contrasts indicate that in comparison to the noninfected serogroup, older subjects were more likely to be monoinfected with HIV (OR = 1.08 [95% CI, 1.059 to 1.100], PFDR <0.001), monoinfected with HCV (OR = 1.21 [95% CI, 1.172, to 1.252], PFDR <0.001) or coinfected (OR = 1.22 [95% CI, 1.197 to 1.252], PFDR <0.001). Distribution of the APRI and FIB-4 fibrotic indexes, stratified by their clinically relevant cutoffs, also differed between the groups (P<0.001) (Table 1). Six pairwise comparisons of mean liver scores were performed between designated serogroups for each fibrosis metric (Fig 1). On average, coinfected participants had higher APRI and FIB-4 measures when compared to the HCV monoinfected population (APRI, 0.36, 95% CI, 0.064 to 0.651; FIB-4, 0.78, 95% CI, 0.375 to 1.184) and the HIV monoinfected population (APRI, 0.64, 95% CI, 0.487 to 0.786; FIB-4, 1.19, 95% CI, 0.984 to 1.397) (Fig 1). All other comparisons between serogroups were found to be statistically significant (95% confidence interval) except the mean APRI scores for noninfected vs. HIV monoinfected (-0.15, 95% CI, -0.325 to 0.031) and HIV monoinfected vs. HCV monoinfected (-0.28, 95% CI, -0.571 to 0.012) which follow the expected trend but do not achieve statistical significance (Fig 1). With regard to possible confounding factors, BMI, HBV serological status, and alcohol usage are also shown stratified between the four HIV/HCV serostatuses (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Mean liver fibrosis scores for each viral serotype.

Fig 1

The mean APRI and FIB-4 scores at baseline visit + SD are shown for 1,858 women stratified by definitive viral serostatus. The number of patients (n) for each viral serostatus are indicated in Table 1. Pairwise comparisons of liver outcomes were performed for all viral-serotype group-comparisons within each liver metric. Apart from those comparisons labeled not significant (ns), all other comparisons within fibrosis index aside from those labeled as significant were also below the 0.05 p-value threshold.

Utilizing the larger cohort for race and age adjustment helped to ensure that we had the population size to account for the impact of these variables on liver fibrosis. Whereas the first principle component of the PCA of genomic markers of ancestry (PC1) appeared to adequately differentiate African-Americans (non-Hispanic), Hispanics, and Whites (non-Hispanic) (Fig 2A), we took a conservative approach and included the first three principle components (PC1, PC2, PC3). Although adjusting for race/ethnicity using self-report identified the same genetic associations, we opted to employ the 3 PCs to better account for confounding that can occur with self-reported race and ethnicity. For example, many participants self-reporting as “Hispanic” or “Other” in the coinfected subgroup present with a genetic background more consistent with the African-American (non-Hispanic) and White (non-Hispanic) clusters (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Genomic estimates of race/ethnicity using principle component analysis.

Fig 2

The 1,858 WIHS participants utilized in this study were stratified using 185 ancestral SNV markers from across the genome. PC1 and PC2 are depicted above. Genomic estimates of race and ethnicity were compared to reported race and ethnicity (A) and the distribution of HIV/HCV coinfected participants of focus are displayed (B).

After adjustment for multiple testing, seven nsSNV mapping to separate genes met the a priori criterion of PFDR <0.05 for at least one of the biomarkers of liver fibrosis (Table 2). Of these, only rs52828316 (MAN2A2) was significant by PFDR for both indices. For all nsSNV, two copies of the minor allele (i.e., minor allele homozygotes) was associated with increases in APRI and/or FIB-4 (Table 2). Upon sensitivity analysis of additional adjustable factors of HBV Status, alcohol usage, and BMI (N = 616), all statistically significant nsSNVs were maintained, and APRI and FIB-4 estimates for all but rs1800472 (TGFB1) were within 10% of that of the initial model (S3 Table). Two additional nsSNV were found to be significant when additionally adjusting for HBV status, alcohol, and BMI, namely rs3745925 (MADCAM1) and rs2307145 (IL12RB2) (S3 Table). ALPK2 rs3809973 was evaluated further in relation to hepatic fibrosis among the four viral serogroups because it was the only variant sufficiently frequent (n>100) to result in all three genotypic groups (i.e., major allele homozygotes, heterozygotes, minor allele homozygotes), and the ALPK2 variant was not sensitive to adjustable factors on the linear regression model.

Table 2. Baseline screen of multiple linear regression models.

Model Fit (N = 661) SNV + Age + PC1-3 + HIV Load + HCV Load Study Sample MAF
Outcome APRI FIB-4
SNV Alleles (N) Estimate P PFDR Estimate P PFDR
rs3809973 CC (154) 0.61 <0.01 <0.01 0.74 <0.01 0.08 0.48
ALPK2 AC (321) 0.10 0.39 0.15 0.40
(K829N) AA (186) 0 0
rs17035120 TT (4) 2.00 <0.01 0.42 3.77 <0.01 0.05 0.07
GLT8D2 TC (81) -0.03 0.84 0.16 0.48
(A37T) CC (576) 0 0
rs1800450 AA (6) 1.52 <0.01 0.15 3.28 <0.01 0.01 0.06
MBL2 AG (66) -0.32 0.06 -0.42 0.10
(G54D) GG (589) 0 0
rs77452813 TT (2) 3.40 <0.01 0.08 5.90 <0.01 0.01 0.04
MCOLN2 TC (50) -0.13 0.50 -0.16 0.58
(V20I) CC (609) 0 0
rs52828316 AA (2) 7.55 <0.01 <0.01 6.43 <0.01 <0.01 0.03
MAN2A2 AG (42) -0.24 0.24 -0.30 0.33
(R1039H) GG (617) 0 0
rs2228015 TC (20) 1.02 <0.01 0.08 1.75 <0.01 0.01 0.02
CCR7 TT (641) 0 0
(M7V)
rs1800472 TC (13) 1.77 <0.01 <0.01 1.26 0.02 0.66 0.01
TGFB1 CC (648) 0 0
(T263I)

Bold Indicates Significant P Values.

Multiple Linear Regression of each SNV adjusted for Age (continuous), Race (PC1-PC3), HIV/HCV Load (log2 copies/mL; continuous).

Single Letter Amino Acid Abbreviation and Position of Resulting Substitution.

Potential Gain or Loss of an NxS/T Caused by Substitution.

Abbreviations: PC, Principle Component; NxS/T, N-linked Glycosylation Sequon; SNV, Single Nucleotide Variant; MAF, Minor Allele Frequency, FDR, False Discovery Rate.

In order to see if the ALPK2 variant’s tentative association with increased liver fibrosis in coinfected women was preferentially impacted by the effects of either virus, we analyzed each genotype of the ALPK2 variant across all viral serostatuses utilized in the cohort. For the ALPK2 rs3809973, HIV/HCV coinfected participants who were homozygous for the minor allele had significantly higher mean APRI and FIB-4 scores relative to the coinfected participants homozygous for the major allele (APRI, 0.61, 95% CI, 0.334 to 0.875; FIB-4, 0.74, 95% CI, 0.336 to 1.144) and compared to those HCV monoinfected participants homozygous for the minor allele (APRI, 0.79, 95% CI, 0.370 to 1.200; FIB-4, 1.24, 95% CI, 0.820 to 1.650) (Fig 3A and 3B). Evaluation of the association of ALPK2 rs3809973 with APRI and FIB-4 by racial and ethnic group (i.e., non-Hispanic African-American, non-Hispanic Caucasian, Hispanic) revealed similar patterns of association with one exception in non-Hispanic African-American where no difference by genotypic group was observed with FIB-4 (data not shown). The heterozygotes of coinfected individuals displayed no significant increases in APRI or FIB-4 relative to the coinfected major allele homozygotes (APRI, 0.10, 95% CI, -0.128 to 0.332; FIB-4, 0.15, 95% CI, -0.195 to 0.492). These coinfected population findings for the ALPK2 nsSNV (rs3809973) were observed against a background of similar CD4+ T-cell percentage, measured relative to other leukocyte types, and detectable HIV viral loads at baseline (Fig 3C and 3D). HIV monoinfected participants homozygous for the minor allele displayed significantly increased FIB-4 (0.45, 95% CI, 0.028 to 0.879) scores relative to noninfected participants homozygous for the minor allele, but the finding was not significant for the same comparison using APRI (0.00, 95% CI, -0.422 to 0.429) (Fig 3A and 3B). For the HIV monoinfected genotype, a slight significant difference in the CD4+ T-cell percentage (P = 0.007) accompanied this FIB-4 finding. Impacts of variant ALPK2 allele burden between genotypes in the noninfected and HCV monoinfected serogroups were unremarkable (Fig 3A and 3B). A parallel set of analyses were conducted with adjustment for the additional factors of HBV status, alcohol use, and BMI. Overall, little differences from the present analysis was observed (S2 Fig). However, when comparing the heterozygotes of coinfected individuals to the coinfected major allele homozygotes, FIB-4 was found to be significantly increased (0.19, 95% CI, 0.006 to 0.382) with the APRI measure of the same comparison borderline insignificant (0.17, 95% CI, -0.022 to 0.353) when adjusting for these additional factors (S2 Fig).

Fig 3. rs3809973 (ALPK2) impact on APRI and FIB-4 outcomes.

Fig 3

Mean baseline APRI (A) and FIB-4 (B) score with 95% confidence interval shown for the allele pairs of each serotype (Total N = 1,858). The number of samples representing each genotype for the respective serogroups is displayed as follows: homozygous for the major allele (green), heterozygous (orange), and homozygous for the minor allele (blue). Comparisons were shown, for reference, relative to the major allele homozygote of the noninfected serogroup. ANOVA was used to compare relative CD4+ T-cell percentages (C) or HIV/HCV viral loads (D) between the genotypes of each serogroup. Asterisks indicate two-sided P-values below 0.05 (*) and 0.01 (**) respectively.

Discussion

This study identified several novel genetic associations among glycogenes and biomarkers of liver fibrosis. Average liver fibrosis scores in the coinfected serogroup analyzed at baseline were significantly higher than that of either HIV or HCV monoinfected participants as shown in Fig 1, recapitulating the fibrotic trends described in the literature for coinfected populations [6,26]. Of the 887 nsSNV assessed that either directly (nsSNV affecting NxS/T sequons) or indirectly (nsSNV in glycosylation or lectin genes) alter glycosylation pathways or products, we found seven nsSNV that were associated with an increased risk of hepatic fibrosis among the HIV/HCV coinfected population. We observed higher APRI and FIB-4 values (indicative of greater fibrosis) in coinfected participants homozygous for the ALPK2 rs3809973 minor allele when compared with participants homozygous for the ALPK2 rs3809973 major allele irrespective of HIV and HCV viral load, BMI, HBV Status, or alcohol usage (Fig 3 and S2 Fig). As elevations in viral HIV titers have been correlated with increased liver injury in the coinfected [27], our findings suggest that the genetic risk of hepatic fibrosis among coinfected individuals carrying the ALPK2 rs3809973 risk allele is not confounded by these titers. The lack of association in coinfected participants between the ALPK2 variant heterozygote and increased liver fibrosis suggested the need for variant homozygosity for the detrimental impacts of the variant to manifest in the coinfected and conforms with a recessive mode of inheritance. As shown in Fig 3, among HIV monoinfected participants, the relative CD4+ T-cell percentage among leukocytes was inversely associated with FIB-4. Furthermore, coinfected participants that were homozygous for the minor allele were significantly increased in terms of fibrosis risk when compared to HCV monoinfected participants of the same genotype; suggesting a need for general HIV-associated immunosuppression to produce the detrimental fibrosis risk increase. Our comparisons of ALPK2 rs3809973 among serogroups at baseline therefore leads us to speculate that the risk allele’s impact on liver fibrosis is reliant on both HCV-mediated liver damage and its perpetuation by HIV-mediated immunosuppression.

The ALPK2 gene and rs3809973 have not been linked to a pathological liver phenotype to date. Although the association of ALPK2 rs3809973 with fibrosis in the setting of HIV/HCV coinfection warrants replication, some circumstantial evidence suggests a potential role for ALPK2 in risk for viral hepatic fibrosis. Hepatic Stellate cells (HSC) lining the perisinusoidal space of the liver are the fibrogenic cell type responsible for extracellular matrix deposition and subsequent fibrosis in the setting of hepatic inflammation. Although this fibrogenic response is designed to protect against liver injury and typically reverses after the hepatic insult subsides, progressive inflammation and the chronic activation of HSCs can lead to cirrhosis and an increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma [28,29]. Signaling molecules and pathways involved in HSC activation have been described, but most notable is the expression of toll-like receptors on HSCs enables their activation upon exposure to structurally conserved microbial-derived products such as lipopolysaccharide [30]. Although incompletely characterized, the ALPK2 protein was first identified in cardiomyocytes as an integral regulator of heart development [31]. However, most studies of ALPK2 have focused on the pathological processes of the gastrointestinal tract. ALPK2 is associated with luminal apoptosis in colorectal cancer cell lines [32]. Luminal shedding is a phenomenon of the enteric innate immune system designed to maintain the function of the gut barrier by preventing the invasion of virulent microbes into systemic circulation. The increased apoptosis of enterocytes in the absence of their concomitant replacement can yield an increasingly permeable intestinal membrane that leaves the host vulnerable to augmented translocation of microbial products [33]. Since increased microbial translocation is a hallmark of HIV infection and lipopolysaccharide activates HSCs [34], any augmentation of this translocation process would exacerbate liver fibrosis in the context of existing hepatitis. In addition, a genome-wide association study of inflammatory bowel disease, a condition in which pathological epithelial shedding is observed, found the mRNA of ALPK2 to be up-regulated in inflamed mucosa compared to control samples [35]. Therefore, we speculate that ALPK2 rs3809973 could enhance liver fibrosis by interfering with enteric immunity. Even though this variant generates a novel NxS/T sequon, augmentation of glycan attachment onto the amino acid substitution encoded by the minor allele has not been demonstrated. Structural studies indicate that the variant does not interrupt the kinase domain nor any residues known to be post-translationally modified, glycosylation or otherwise [31,36]. Therefore, the impact of the K829N substitution encoded by rs3809973 on ALPK2 structure and function warrant investigation.

Although the low minor allele frequency of the remaining 6 nsSNV associated with increased liver fibrosis (i.e., CCR7 rs2228015, GLT8D2 rs17035120, MAN2A2 rs52828316, MBL2 rs1800450, MCOLN2 rs77452813, and TGFB1 rs1800472) precluded detailed modeling, their previous associations with liver disease, metabolism, and viral immunity in other literature provide impetus for further investigation. TGFB1 has long been linked to enhanced hepatocyte destruction and HSC activation [37]. GLT8D2 and MAN2A2 have been implicated in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease [38] and coinfected liver disease [39], respectively. Finally, CCR7, MBL2, and MCOLN2 have all been connected to the modulation of host cellular and immune responses in viral infection [4042]. Taken together, all seven nsSNV and their cognate genes have plausible roles in liver disease pathology and warrant replication in an independent sample(s).

We note that there are limitations to this study. As this is an exclusively female cohort, future studies should aim to validate these findings in men. Although we identified that there are potentially more than 42,000 nsSNV that either directly altered N-linked glycosylation sites (NxS/T) or that may indirectly alter the function of enzymes or lectins interacting with glycoproteins, only a subset (2.5%) were available for analysis in the cohort due to a combination of low nsSNV allele frequency in the population and/or lack of inclusion of the majority of nsSNV on the commercial array used. A number of factors hindered our attempts at a longitudinal assessment of the genetic risk factors on the coinfected population. For one, as the standard of care for HIV treatment changed for coinfected WIHS participants longitudinally (S3A and S3B Fig), adjusting for shifting antiviral treatment regimens at different time points to meet this standard of care was a challenge. Secondly, as this cohort was initially designed to investigate HIV progression, the HCV virologic status was only determined at baseline and HCV clearance was not assessed further, thereby making longitudinal analyses of HCV-infection status susceptible to misclassification bias. In addition, we had no way of determining the duration of HCV infection at the time of serologic assessment. Along similar lines, survival bias and the availability of more effective and less toxic HIV treatments for new enrollees over time in WIHS may have attenuated the relationship between susceptibility alleles and fibrosis [27]. The rate of loss to follow-up was also problematic in that nearly one third of the coinfected participants at baseline were no longer in the cohort after four visits (2 years) (S3C and S3D Fig). With regard to our sensitivity analysis, only 32 patients (2%) were chronically infected with HBV and this may not have been sufficient power to account for the influence of HBV on liver fibrosis in the linear regression model. Although BMI is a practical means of estimating obesity, it was used in the sensitivity analysis as an imperfect measure of NAFLD and may not fully account for the impact of the condition of liver fibrosis. Along similar lines, alcohol usage was self-reported and may be subject to under reporting in the sensitivity analysis, as the largest fraction of subjects from each of the virally infected serogroups in Table 1 reported to abstain from all alcohol consumption. Finally, APRI and FIB-4 scores are correlated with liver fibrosis risk, but both are imperfect surrogate measures. The utility of these surrogate fibrosis metrics has been validated against biopsy and other measures (i.e. transient elastography) in previous studies [43], but were not validated by such methods at present.

Given the goal of improving the prognosis of liver disease in the HIV/HCV coinfected population, we have identified candidate genes that may participate in hepatic fibrosis. Although these genetic associations require replication, demonstration of the impact of each of the seven nsSNVs on N-linked glycosylation of the site and its cognate protein warrants investigation. Longitudinal HCV testing and assessment of viremia along with additional studies in other HIV/HCV coinfected cohorts may permit better stratification of serogroups and to perform longitudinal analysis of these candidate gene nsSNV.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Genotyping and data processing workflow.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. rs3809973 (ALPK2) impact on APRI and FIB-4 outcomes with additional HBV, alcohol, and BMI adjustment.

Mean baseline APRI (A) and FIB-4 (B) score with 95% confidence interval shown for the allele pairs of each serotype (Total N = 1,790). The number of samples representing each genotype for the respective serogroups is displayed as follows: homozygous for the major allele (green), heterozygous (orange), and homozygous for the minor allele (blue). Comparisons were shown, for reference, relative to the major allele homozygote of the noninfected serogroup. Different from Fig 3, Outcome was additionally adjusted for factors influencing liver fibrosis including HBV infection status, Alcohol usage, and BMI. ANOVA was used to compare relative CD4+ T-cell percentages (C) or HIV/HCV viral loads (D) between the genotypes of each serogroup. Asterisks indicate two-sided P-values below 0.05 (*) and 0.01 (**) respectively.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Longitudinal trends characterizing the HIV/HCV coinfected population.

The values are summarized annually at every second visit. (A) Composition of the anti-HIV drug regimens changing in line with treatment guidelines; no therapy (red), monotherapy (blue), combination therapy (green), or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (purple). (B) Mean CD4+ percentages (black symbols) and mean HIV viral load (red symbols). (C) The median APRI and (D) FIB-4 indexes.

(TIF)

S1 Table. NxS/T nsSNV utilized in analysis.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Glycogene nsSNV utilized in analysis.

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Baseline screen of multiple linear regression models with additional adjustment for Alcohol, HBV, and BMI (NAFLD).

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

Data in this manuscript were collected by the Women’s Interagency HIV Study, now the MACS/WIHS Combined Cohort Study (MWCCS). The contents of this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). MWCCS (Principal Investigators): Atlanta CRS (Ighovwerha Ofotokun, Anandi Sheth, and Gina Wingood), U01-HL146241; Bronx CRS (Kathryn Anastos and Anjali Sharma), U01-HL146204; Brooklyn CRS (Deborah Gustafson and Tracey Wilson), U01-HL146202; Data Analysis and Coordination Center (Gypsyamber D’Souza, Stephen Gange and Elizabeth Golub), U01-HL146193; Chicago-Cook County CRS (Mardge Cohen and Audrey French), U01-HL146245; Connie Wofsy Women’s HIV Study, Northern California CRS (Bradley Aouizerat and Phyllis Tien), U01-HL146242; Metropolitan Washington CRS (Seble Kassaye and Daniel Merenstein), U01-HL146205; Miami CRS (Maria Alcaide, Margaret Fischl, and Deborah Jones), U01-HL146203; UAB-MS CRS (Mirjam-Colette Kempf and Deborah Konkle-Parker), U01-HL146192; UNC CRS (Adaora Adimora), U01-HL146194. Additionally, the authors would like to thank Jing Wu and Yiwen Wang for their data assembly and analysis efforts.

Data Availability

As described in the manuscript, the cohort is in active follow-up. The cohort has been identified as one with multiple vulnerabilities (e.g., racial/ethnic minority women, coinfected). Whereas participants from the cohort who contributed to the findings summarized in this manuscript provided written consent for genetic studies, said consent was collected prior to the most recent guidelines and requirements for data sharing. The WIHS cohort operates under an alternative data sharing plan registered with the National Institutes of Health and access to phenotypic and genomic data can be requested by submitting a Concept Sheet, which can be found along with instructions for Concept Sheet submission, at https://statepi.jhsph.edu/mwccs/. The accession number for the WIHS in dbGaP genomic data is now provided in the manuscript (phs001503). The cohort is currently being re-approached to obtain informed consent for sharing of their data. This has been consistent with other genomic studies in the WIHS cohort.

Funding Statement

Research reported in this publication was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health to RG (awards R01CA135069 and R01CA238455). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The MWCCS is funded primarily by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), with additional co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child Health & Human Development (NICHD), National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI), National Institute On Aging (NIA), National Institute Of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke (NINDS), National Institute Of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute On Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). MWCCS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 (UCSF CTSA), P30-AI-050409 (Atlanta CFAR), P30-AI-050410 (UNC CFAR), and P30- AI-027767 (UAB CFAR). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Sherman KE, Peters MG, Thomas D. Human immunodeficiency virus and liver disease: A comprehensive update. Hepatol Commun. 2017;1(10):987–1001. 10.1002/hep4.1112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cahill S, Valadéz R. Growing older with HIV/AIDS: new public health challenges. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):e7–e15. 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Palella FJ, Baker RK, Moorman AC, et al. Mortality in the highly active antiretroviral therapy era: changing causes of death and disease in the HIV outpatient study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006;43(1):27–34. 10.1097/01.qai.0000233310.90484.16 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Salmon-Ceron D, Lewden C, Morlat P, et al. Liver disease as a major cause of death among HIV infected patients: role of hepatitis C and B viruses and alcohol. J Hepatol. 2005;42(6):799–805. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Avihingsanon A, Jitmitraparp S, Tangkijvanich P, et al. Advanced liver fibrosis by transient elastography, fibrosis 4, and alanine aminotransferase/platelet ratio index among Asian hepatitis C with and without human immunodeficiency virus infection: role of vitamin D levels. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29(9):1706–1714. 10.1111/jgh.12613 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chrysanthidis T, Loli G, Metallidis S, Germanidis G. Mechanisms of accelerated liver fibrosis in HIV-HCV coinfection. AIDS Rev. 2017;19(3):148–155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lledó GM, Carrasco I, Benítez-Gutiérrez LM, et al. Regression of liver fibrosis after curing chronic hepatitis C with oral antivirals in patients with and without HIV coinfection. AIDS. 2018;32(16):2347–2352. 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001966 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Henry B. Drug Pricing & Challenges to Hepatitis C Treatment Access. J Health Biomed Law. 2018;14:265–283. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Schwarz F, Aebi M. Mechanisms and principles of N-linked protein glycosylation. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2011;21(5):576–582. 10.1016/j.sbi.2011.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Rudd PM. Glycosylation and the Immune System. Science. 2001;291(5512):2370–2376. 10.1126/science.291.5512.2370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Crocker PR, Paulson JC, Varki A. Siglecs and their roles in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2007;7(4):255–266. 10.1038/nri2056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van Breedam W, Pöhlmann S, Favoreel HW, de Groot RJ, Nauwynck HJ. Bitter-sweet symphony: glycan-lectin interactions in virus biology. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38(4):598–632. 10.1111/1574-6976.12052 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mazumder R, Morampudi KS, Motwani M, Vasudevan S, Goldman R. Proteome-Wide Analysis of Single-Nucleotide Variations in the N-Glycosylation Sequon of Human Genes. Dalby AR, ed. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(5):e36212. 10.1371/journal.pone.0036212 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fan Y, Hu Y, Yan C, et al. Loss and gain of N-linked glycosylation sequons due to single-nucleotide variation in cancer. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4322. 10.1038/s41598-018-22345-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bacon MC, von Wyl V, Alden C, et al. The Women’s Interagency HIV Study: an observational cohort brings clinical sciences to the bench. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005;12(9):1013–1019. 10.1128/CDLI.12.9.1013-1019.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Sarkar M, Aouzierat B, Bacchetti P, et al. Association of IFNL3 and IFNL4 polymorphisms with liver-related mortality in a multiracial cohort of HIV/HCV-coinfected women. J Viral Hepat. 2015;22(12):1055–1060. 10.1111/jvh.12431 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.French AL, Martin JW, Evans CT, et al. Macrophage Activation and the Tumor Necrosis Factor Cascade in Hepatitis C Disease Progression Among HIV-Infected Women Participating in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2017;76(4):438–444. 10.1097/QAI.0000000000001524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Urabe Y, Ochi H, Kato N, et al. A genome-wide association study of HCV-induced liver cirrhosis in the Japanese population identifies novel susceptibility loci at the MHC region. J Hepatol. 2013;58(5):875–882. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43(6):1317–1325. 10.1002/hep.21178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin Z-H, Xin Y-N, Dong Q-J, et al. Performance of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index for the staging of hepatitis C-related fibrosis: an updated meta-analysis. Hepatology. 2011;53(3):726–736. 10.1002/hep.24105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kuniholm MH, Gao X, Xue X, et al. The relation of HLA genotype to hepatitis C viral load and markers of liver fibrosis in HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected women. J Infect Dis. 2011;203(12):1807–1814. 10.1093/infdis/jir192 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hansen L, Lind-Thomsen A, Joshi HJ, et al. A glycogene mutation map for discovery of diseases of glycosylation. Glycobiology. 2015;25(2):211–224. 10.1093/glycob/cwu104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bouwman LH, Roos A, Terpstra OT, et al. Mannose binding lectin gene polymorphisms confer a major risk for severe infections after liver transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2005;129(2):408–414. 10.1016/j.gastro.2005.06.049 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shendre A, Wiener HW, Irvin MR, et al. Genome-wide admixture and association study of subclinical atherosclerosis in the Women’s Interagency HIV Study (WIHS). PLoS ONE. 2017;12(12):e0188725. 10.1371/journal.pone.0188725 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Frasco MA, Mack WJ, Van Den Berg D, et al. Underlying genetic structure impacts the association between CYP2B6 polymorphisms and response to efavirenz and nevirapine. AIDS. 2012;26(16):2097–2106. 10.1097/QAD.0b013e3283593602 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mohsen AH, Easterbrook PJ, Taylor C, et al. Impact of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection on the progression of liver fibrosis in hepatitis C virus infected patients. Gut. 2003;52(7):1035–1040. 10.1136/gut.52.7.1035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Bräu N, Salvatore M, Ríos-Bedoya CF, et al. Slower fibrosis progression in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients with successful HIV suppression using antiretroviral therapy. J Hepatol. 2006;44(1):47–55. 10.1016/j.jhep.2005.07.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lee YA, Wallace MC, Friedman SL. Pathobiology of liver fibrosis: a translational success story. Gut. 2015;64(5):830–841. 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-306842 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.O’Rourke JM, Sagar VM, Shah T, Shetty S. Carcinogenesis on the background of liver fibrosis: Implications for the management of hepatocellular cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(39):4436–4447. 10.3748/wjg.v24.i39.4436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Tsuchida T, Friedman SL. Mechanisms of hepatic stellate cell activation. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;14(7):397–411. 10.1038/nrgastro.2017.38 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ryazanov AG, Pavur KS, Dorovkov MV. Alpha-kinases: a new class of protein kinases with a novel catalytic domain. Curr Biol. 1999;9(2):R43–45. 10.1016/s0960-9822(99)80006-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yoshida Y, Tsunoda T, Doi K, et al. ALPK2 is crucial for luminal apoptosis and DNA repair-related gene expression in a three-dimensional colonic-crypt model. Anticancer Res. 2012;32(6):2301–2308. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yu LC-H, Wang J-T, Wei S-C, Ni Y-H. Host-microbial interactions and regulation of intestinal epithelial barrier function: From physiology to pathology. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol. 2012;3(1):27–43. 10.4291/wjgp.v3.i1.27 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Brenchley JM, Price DA, Schacker TW, et al. Microbial translocation is a cause of systemic immune activation in chronic HIV infection. Nat Med. 2006;12(12):1365–1371. 10.1038/nm1511 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Palmieri O, Creanza TM, Bossa F, et al. Genome-wide Pathway Analysis Using Gene Expression Data of Colonic Mucosa in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2015;21(6):1260–1268. 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hornbeck PV, Zhang B, Murray B, Kornhauser JM, Latham V, Skrzypek E. PhosphoSitePlus, 2014: mutations, PTMs and recalibrations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D512–520. 10.1093/nar/gku1267 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Dooley S, ten Dijke P. TGF-β in progression of liver disease. Cell Tissue Res. 2012;347(1):245–256. 10.1007/s00441-011-1246-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhan Y, Zhao F, Xie P, et al. Mechanism of the effect of glycosyltransferase GLT8D2 on fatty liver. Lipids Health Dis. 2015;14:43. 10.1186/s12944-015-0040-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Gupta P, Liu B, Wu JQ, et al. Genome-wide mRNA and miRNA analysis of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) reveals different miRNAs regulating HIV/HCV co-infection. Virology. 2014;450–451:336–349. 10.1016/j.virol.2013.12.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Hayasaka H, Kobayashi D, Yoshimura H, Nakayama EE, Shioda T, Miyasaka M. The HIV-1 Gp120/CXCR4 axis promotes CCR7 ligand-dependent CD4 T cell migration: CCR7 homo- and CCR7/CXCR4 hetero-oligomer formation as a possible mechanism for up-regulation of functional CCR7. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(2):e0117454. 10.1371/journal.pone.0117454 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Eisen S, Dzwonek A, Klein NJ. Mannose-binding lectin in HIV infection. Future Virol. 2008;3(3):225–233. 10.2217/17460794.3.3.225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Rinkenberger N, Schoggins JW. Mucolipin-2 Cation Channel Increases Trafficking Efficiency of Endocytosed Viruses. mBio. 2018;9(1). 10.1128/mBio.02314-17 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Papadopoulos N, Vasileiadi S, Papavdi M, et al. Liver fibrosis staging with combination of APRI and FIB-4 scoring systems in chronic hepatitis C as an alternative to transient elastography. Ann Gastroenterol. 2019;32(5):498–503. 10.20524/aog.2019.0406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Jason T Blackard

8 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-31305

A genomic variant of ALPK2 is associated with increased liver fibrosis risk in HIV/HCV coinfected women

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Goldman,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jan 15 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Jason Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent.

In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed).

If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians.

If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

'The MWCCS is funded primarily by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI),

with additional co-funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute Of Child

Health & Human Development (NICHD), National Human Genome Research Institute

(NHGRI), National Institute On Aging (NIA), National Institute Of Dental & Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute Of Allergy And Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institute Of Neurological Disorders And Stroke (NINDS), National Institute Of Mental Health (NIMH), National Institute On Drug Abuse (NIDA), National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), National Cancer Institute (NCI), National Institute on Alcohol

Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK). MWCCS data collection is also supported by UL1-TR000004 (UCSF CTSA), P30-AI-050409 (Atlanta CFAR), P30-AI-050410 (UNC CFAR), and P30-AI-027767 (UAB CFAR).'

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

a. Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

'The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.'

b. Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

5. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

'The authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI; https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov) provided grant support to the following co-authors: U01-HL146242 (BEA, JCP); U01-HL146205 (SGK); U01-HL146202 (MHA); U01-HL146245 (ALF); U01-HL146193 (SJG); and U01-HL146204 (KMA).'

a. Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

b. Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Please know it is PLOS ONE policy for corresponding authors to declare, on behalf of all authors, all potential competing interests for the purposes of transparency. PLOS defines a competing interest as anything that interferes with, or could reasonably be perceived as interfering with, the full and objective presentation, peer review, editorial decision-making, or publication of research or non-research articles submitted to one of the journals. Competing interests can be financial or non-financial, professional, or personal. Competing interests can arise in relationship to an organization or another person. Please follow this link to our website for more details on competing interests: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests

Additional Editor Comments:

This is a study of genetic factors associated with liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV co-infected women.

Data on HIV treatment status, as well as HCV genotype should be included.

In all analyses, HCV mono-infected means HCV RNA positive, correct?

Figure 1 would be easier to view with white/black columns for APRI/FIB-4 rather than the hatched/dashed columns.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In this report, Mclntosh AT, et al describes ALPK2 rs3809973 single nucleotide variant

was associated with liver fibrosis in HIV/HCV coinfected patients. These data are very interesting and might be new important knowledge, however there are several concerns as reviewer describes below.

Major points:

1. Authors described in introduction section, HCV and HIV are at high risk of coinfection due to common models of transmission. HBV is also common models of transmission and important and indispensable virus associated with liver fibrosis. You should show present or absence of HBV infection in all your patients.

2. Liver biopsy is certainly an invasive examination, however you should investigate elastography (for example fibroscan or others) to evaluate liver fibrosis.

3. You focused proteins associated with glycosylation. Actually these proteins may associate with liver fibrosis and evaluated in relation to surrogate biomarkers of that. This reviewer cannot understand why you focused only genes associated with glycosylation. You should investigate gene ontology analysis or other and show other gene groups associated with liver fibrosis in your results of nsSNV examination.

4. In Table 1, you should show unit of HIV or HCV load, and also platelet count, ALT, AST needed to calculate FIB-4 or APRI score. Moreover, it is better to show factors associated with hepatic function for example total bilirubin, albumin or prothrombin time.

5. In Table 2, you showed multiple linear regression used SNV, age, PC1-3, HIV load and HCV load. Why do you select these factors? HIV load or HCV load are not associated with degree of liver fibrosis. Moreover, you should show why you select only ALPK2 among SNV listed in this table.

5. You described in method section, you obtained continuous clinical measured of APRI or FIB-4. What time point is data showed in results?

You should also show present or absence of anti-HIV or HCV therapy in your patients.

6. Why do you investigate only female patients? You need to describe differences between female and male patients.

7. Figure 2 and 3 are low resolution and low quality.

Minor point:

In Figure 1, you need to show which group were significantly different.

Reviewer #2: The study is overall well performed and manuscript well written. Authors have suggested a possible mechanism for their positive findings in the discussion section.

However there are major limitations in regards to clinical implications. Some of these have already been identified by authors in the discussion section including one time HCV testing, FIB-4 and APRI not being the gold standard of liver fibrosis, lack of serial testing and high drop out rate, all female cohort.

Other major limitation is that significant confounding factors have not been accounted for. These include duration of HCV infection, presence of other liver disease, in particular, NAFLD which has high prevalence in the general population as well as HIV infected patients, as well chronic Hepatitis B and alcohol consumption. Lack of these data significantly limit the ability to draw definite conclusions regarding association of ALPK2 and liver fibrosis but might be worthwhile exploring in prospective manner.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 11;16(3):e0247277. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247277.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Jan 2021

Response to Editor:

1. "Data on HIV treatment status, as well as HCV genotype should be included."

We have included HIV treatment status as the Editor has requested. HCV genotype is available for roughly 15% of the coinfected population and none of the HCV monoinfected population. As such, we opted to exclude it from table 1.

2. "In all analyses, HCV mono-infected means HCV RNA positive, correct?"

Yes, we made sure to note this in the methods section that HCV monoinfection was determined by anti-HCV serum antibodies and detectable HCV RNA titers.

3. "Figure 1 would be easier to view with white/black columns for APRI/FIB-4 rather than the hatched/dashed columns."

The authors agree and the changes have been made to Figure 1 accordingly.

________

Response to Reviewer #1

1. "Authors described in introduction section, HCV and HIV are at high risk of coinfection due to common models of transmission. HBV is also common models of transmission and important and indispensable virus associated with liver fibrosis. You should show present or absence of HBV infection in all your patients."

The authors are in agreement with the reviewers on the necessity of HBV inclusion. In initial analyses, we excluded it because only 32 patients (2% of the 1,858 participants in the study) were found to have chronic HBV infection. In the revised manuscript, we have incorporated this into our Table 1 and have adjusted for HBV in sensitivity analyses found in Table S3/Figure S2. We observed no major changes in our results and we have added this discussion in Discussion Section.

2. "Liver biopsy is certainly an invasive examination, however you should investigate elastography (for example fibroscan or others) to evaluate liver fibrosis."

We fully agree that elastography would complement the surrogate fibrosis indices of APRI and FIB-4 presently used. Unfortunately, elastography was not done when patients were recruited. The baseline evaluation predates elastography and is not feasible in this study. Although our surrogate markers of liver fibrosis have their disadvantages, elastography and the associated technology also require some refinement. Several studies have shown that results from elastography can vary from operator to operator on the same individual, and that extremes in patient adiposity can also influence the attainment of a reliable scan/result. As such, the authors find that the surrogate fibrosis indices utilized were practical and appropriate for the time frame and cohort size necessary to investigate the present research questions.

3. "You focused proteins associated with glycosylation. Actually these proteins may associate with liver fibrosis and evaluated in relation to surrogate biomarkers of that. This reviewer cannot understand why you focused only genes associated with glycosylation. You should investigate gene ontology analysis or other and show other gene groups associated with liver fibrosis in your results of nsSNV examination."

The now combined WIHS/MACS consortium is made up of multiple research groups across the country, as well as multiple sites of data collection. The process for obtaining data for analysis requires the submission and approval of a data request form to the cohort’s executive committee. We were granted the permission to study the glycosylation related genes as described in the manuscript. The authors believe that the selection of SNPs impacting glycosylation and its related processes are highly relevant to infections diseases and understudied at the same time. Finally, as mentioned in the manuscript, not all of the SNPs we requested from the WIHS executive committee were detected in the population, or, were detected but were being investigated by another research group.

4. "In Table 1, you should show unit of HIV or HCV load, and also platelet count, ALT, AST needed to calculate FIB-4 or APRI score. Moreover, it is better to show factors associated with hepatic function for example total bilirubin, albumin or prothrombin time."

The units of HIV and HCV load are denoted in the subtext of Table 1. We attempted to show factors influencing hepatic function in table 1 per the reviewer’s suggestion, however, very few patients had PT/INR, PTT, or total bilirubin reported. We did show average albumin levels, however, this one measure might only be a small viewing window into hepatic function.

5. "In Table 2, you showed multiple linear regression used SNV, age, PC1-3, HIV load and HCV load. Why do you select these factors? HIV load or HCV load are not associated with degree of liver fibrosis. Moreover, you should show why you select only ALPK2 among SNV listed in this table."

The reviewer asks a great question. Factors we adjusted for:

1. SNV: The main factor we were trying to assess for contribution to outcome.

2. Age: Age is built into the FIB-4 liver fibrosis score calculation. Therefore, the authors wanted to ensure that WIHS participants with higher ages did not confound the association of a increased liver fibrosis risk with any given SNV.

3. PC1-3 (Race/Ethnicity): The prevalence of liver fibrosis in various races/ethnicities varies widely. In genome wide association studies, it is becoming commonplace to adjust for race in terms of principal components if available. In our study, PC1-3 explain more than 90% variation

4. HIV load: Increased HIV load, and therefore increased immunosuppression in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection, has been shown previously to be positively correlated with liver fibrosis1,2. Higher HIV viral load equates to more immune dysregulation and a higher chance of liver fibrosis in the coinfected.

5. HCV load: We agree that little evidence is present in the literature that shows HCV RNA load to be associated with increasing severity of liver fibrosis. However, results did not change in SNV identification irrespective of adjusting for chronic HCV infection as a continuous or categorical variable.

1. Pokorska-Śpiewak M, Stańska-Perka A, Popielska J, Ołdakowska A, Coupland U, Zawadka K, Szczepańska-Putz M, Marczyńska M. Prevalence and predictors of liver disease in HIV-infected children and adolescents. Scientific Reports. 2017;7(1):12309. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-11489-2

2. Mohr R, Schierwagen R, Schwarze-Zander C, Boesecke C, Wasmuth J-C, Trebicka J, Rockstroh JK. Liver Fibrosis in HIV Patients Receiving a Modern cART: Which Factors Play a Role? Medicine. 2015;94(50):e2127. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000002127

What risk factors we have added to the model in the sensitivity analysis:

6. NAFLD: We used Body Mass Index as a continuous surrogate marker in an attempt to adjust for the risk NAFLD poses to increased liver fibrosis risk. Although an imperfect marker for NAFLD (the reason we didn’t incorporate it into the original model) it should help quell the reviewers concerns that we did not adjust for this population of liver disease patients.

7. HBV Infection: We added HBV Status to our list of factors for adjustment. Active HBV infections in the entire sample size equaled to roughly 2%. This low value is ultimately why we didn’t incorporate it into the final model, however it is included in our sensitivity analysis now in the manuscript supplement.

8. Alcohol Consumption: We used alcohol consumption as a categorical variable and grouped patients into: 1) abstain, 2) mild drinker (1-7drinks per week), and 3) heavy drinker (>7 drinks per week). Self-reported values made the authors a bit nervous, as what is classified as a single alcoholic drink could differ from person to person. Also, people tend to report lower amounts of consumption than reality. This is why alcohol consumption was excluded from the previous model, but has been included in the sensitivity analysis.

What risk factors we didn’t adjust for in the original model or sensitivity analysis:

9. HIV drugs that could cause hepatotoxicity: Since the exact drugs utilized in the anti-viral regimens of participants were not listed, we were unable to determine the impact of the liver toxicity secondary to select HIV drugs within classes. As such, simply accounting for these drugs, stratified into 1) No therapy, 2) Monotherapy, 3) Combination therapy, or 4) HAART, to indirectly account for the possibilities of hepatic toxicity from these drugs without specifics seemed futile.

Finally, we focused on ALPK2 because it was a variant frequently found in the population and therefore had enough sample size to parse the variant across all serogroups in comparison to the HIV/HCV coinfected. The low frequency of the other SNVs obtained by the linear regression model would not have allowed this to occur. Also, after adjusting for multiple combinations of factors in the linear regression model, the ALPK2 nsSNV was an anchor that did not appear to fluctuate in estimate or significance regardless of the adjustment.

6. "You described in method section, you obtained continuous clinical measured of APRI or FIB-4. What time point is data showed in results? You should also show present or absence of anti-HIV or HCV therapy in your patients."

Our study reports APRI and FIB-4 measures obtained at baseline (or the first visit for each participant), Subsequent measurements were obtained inconsistently, and patient dropout prevented inclusion of these measures at later timepoints. Presence of HIV therapy has been added to Table 1. Data for HCV therapy was not available.

7. "Why do you investigate only female patients? You need to describe differences between female and male patients."

Before the WIHS and male equivalent, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS), merged into one cohesive overview committee, data had to be requested from a specific cohort. We selected the WIHS because of the completed genotyping data (absent in MACS) and a general lack of studies of this subject in women. Expanding our findings to HIV/HCV coinfected men will be the grounds for future studies, data requests, and analyses.

8. "Figure 2 and 3 are low resolution and low quality."

Adjustments have been made to improve the resolution and quality of Figures 2 and 3.

9. "In Figure 1, you need to show which group were significantly different."

This action has been completed upon reviewer request. With many comparisons significant in one graph, we elected to only show those that were not significant as opposed to significant. In lieu of this, we have added the more relevant stats upon request.

_________

Response to Reviewer #2

“The study is overall well performed and manuscript well written. Authors have suggested a possible mechanism for their positive findings in the discussion section.

However there are major limitations in regards to clinical implications. Some of these have already been identified by authors in the discussion section including one time HCV testing, FIB-4 and APRI not being the gold standard of liver fibrosis, lack of serial testing and high drop out rate, all female cohort. Other major limitation is that significant confounding factors have not been accounted for. These include duration of HCV infection, presence of other liver disease, in particular, NAFLD which has high prevalence in the general population as well as HIV infected patients, as well chronic Hepatitis B and alcohol consumption. Lack of these data significantly limit the ability to draw definite conclusions regarding association of ALPK2 and liver fibrosis but might be worthwhile exploring in prospective manner.”

The authors appreciate the insight of reviewer 2. Many of the concerns of this reviewer have been newly incorporated into our model (HBV, BMI (Surrogate for NAFLD), and Alcohol consumption) in a sensitivity analysis. We observe that with our original list of SNV targets being upheld after these additional adjustments (Please refer to Supplementary Table 3/Table 2). For those factors not addressed, reviewer 2 offers many ways that have allowed the authors to expand their discussion section regarding the limitations of the study.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Responses_To_Editors_Reviewers_FINAL.docx

Decision Letter 1

Jason T Blackard

4 Feb 2021

A genomic variant of ALPK2 is associated with increased liver fibrosis risk in HIV/HCV coinfected women

PONE-D-20-31305R1

Dear Dr. Goldman,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Jason T. Blackard, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

None

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: Despite some limitations in the data due to the nature of the study, authors have addressed most of the major concerns

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Jason T Blackard

2 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-31305R1

A genomic variant of ALPK2 is associated with increased liver fibrosis risk in HIV/HCV coinfected women

Dear Dr. Goldman:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Jason T. Blackard

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Genotyping and data processing workflow.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. rs3809973 (ALPK2) impact on APRI and FIB-4 outcomes with additional HBV, alcohol, and BMI adjustment.

    Mean baseline APRI (A) and FIB-4 (B) score with 95% confidence interval shown for the allele pairs of each serotype (Total N = 1,790). The number of samples representing each genotype for the respective serogroups is displayed as follows: homozygous for the major allele (green), heterozygous (orange), and homozygous for the minor allele (blue). Comparisons were shown, for reference, relative to the major allele homozygote of the noninfected serogroup. Different from Fig 3, Outcome was additionally adjusted for factors influencing liver fibrosis including HBV infection status, Alcohol usage, and BMI. ANOVA was used to compare relative CD4+ T-cell percentages (C) or HIV/HCV viral loads (D) between the genotypes of each serogroup. Asterisks indicate two-sided P-values below 0.05 (*) and 0.01 (**) respectively.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Longitudinal trends characterizing the HIV/HCV coinfected population.

    The values are summarized annually at every second visit. (A) Composition of the anti-HIV drug regimens changing in line with treatment guidelines; no therapy (red), monotherapy (blue), combination therapy (green), or highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) (purple). (B) Mean CD4+ percentages (black symbols) and mean HIV viral load (red symbols). (C) The median APRI and (D) FIB-4 indexes.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. NxS/T nsSNV utilized in analysis.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Glycogene nsSNV utilized in analysis.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Table. Baseline screen of multiple linear regression models with additional adjustment for Alcohol, HBV, and BMI (NAFLD).

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Responses_To_Editors_Reviewers_FINAL.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    As described in the manuscript, the cohort is in active follow-up. The cohort has been identified as one with multiple vulnerabilities (e.g., racial/ethnic minority women, coinfected). Whereas participants from the cohort who contributed to the findings summarized in this manuscript provided written consent for genetic studies, said consent was collected prior to the most recent guidelines and requirements for data sharing. The WIHS cohort operates under an alternative data sharing plan registered with the National Institutes of Health and access to phenotypic and genomic data can be requested by submitting a Concept Sheet, which can be found along with instructions for Concept Sheet submission, at https://statepi.jhsph.edu/mwccs/. The accession number for the WIHS in dbGaP genomic data is now provided in the manuscript (phs001503). The cohort is currently being re-approached to obtain informed consent for sharing of their data. This has been consistent with other genomic studies in the WIHS cohort.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES