Skip to main content
Springer logoLink to Springer
. 2021 Feb 12;166(4):1183–1191. doi: 10.1007/s00705-021-04975-6

Discovery of a phylogenetically distinct poxvirus in diseased Crocodilurus amazonicus (family Teiidae)

Kerstin Seitz 1, Anna Kübber-Heiss 2, Angelika Auer 1, Nora Dinhopl 3, Annika Posautz 2, Marlene Mötz 1, Alexandra Kiesler 1, Claudia Hochleithner 4, Manfred Hochleithner 4, Gregor Springler 5, Annika Lehmbecker 6, Herbert Weissenböck 3, Till Rümenapf 1, Christiane Riedel 1,
PMCID: PMC7952365  PMID: 33580379

Abstract

A novel poxvirus was discovered in Crocodilurus amazonicus (Teiidae) presenting with a debilitating skin disease. The generated first genome sequence of a reptilian poxvirus revealed the closest phylogenetic relationship to avipoxviruses, highlighting potential virus exchanges between avian and reptilian species.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00705-021-04975-6.


Poxviruses are large enveloped viruses containing a double-stranded DNA genome of 130-360 kb. They are important pathogens of high public health and economic impact and are able to infect a wide range of host species, ranging from insects to mammals. Within the family Poxviridae, two subfamilies (Chordopoxvirinae and Entomopoxvirinae) have been defined based on their hosts, which are either vertebrates or insects [1, 2]. The subfamily Chordopoxvirinae is divided into 18 genera, which include a total of 52 species [3].

Poxviruses infecting non-mammalian species belong to the genera Avipoxvirus and Crocodylidpoxvirus. As also observed in mammalian hosts, poxviruses of avian and crocodilian species are primarily associated with skin lesions but can also affect the upper respiratory and gastrointestinal tract [4, 5]. Poxvirus infections of reptiles other than crocodilians have been described in the literature, but no sequence information or further characterization of these viruses is available [611].

The species affected in this study, Crocodilurus amazonicus (“crocodile tegu”), is part of the family Teiidae. These lizards are native to the Amazon and Orinoco basins in South America [12] and belong to one of only two genera of living semi-aquatic teiids, and as such, they inhabit seasonally flooded forested areas near riverbanks or other watercourses. Their mean body temperature, 31.2°C, is higher than the environmental temperature but relatively low compared to that of other teiids, which could be due to their association with water habitats. Their variable diet consists of insects, other small reptiles, and frogs [13, 14].

In 2019, five C. amazonicus, owned by a private collector in Austria, were presented with skin lesions and weight loss. Due to the severity of the clinical signs, one animal had to be euthanized and was sent for further diagnostic evaluation to the pathologists of the Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria. The animal was underweight and had multiple elevated, partially ulcerated skin lesions with a diameter of up to 4 mm on the back and the dorsal areas of head, neck, and tail that did not extend into the underlying muscle (Fig. 1A). Lesions were subsequently analyzed histologically, revealing multifocally and focally extensive epidermal hyperplasia of up to 10-15 times the normal thickness with a severely thickened stratum spinosum forming rete ridges. Keratinocytes showed ballooning degeneration and contained large eosinophilic, intracytoplasmic viral inclusion bodies (Bollinger bodies) up to 20 µm in size (Fig. 1B). Large numbers of poxvirus-like particles were detected within these lesions by transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 1C).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Pathologic and histologic examination. (A) Macroscopic presentation of skin lesions, represented by multiple, up to lentil-sized, elevated, partially ulcerated foci. This scale bar is in centimeters. (B) Hematoxylin-eosin-stained tissue section of an affected area of skin, displaying severe ballooning of the cells and prominent, eosinophilic intracytoplasmatic inclusion bodies. (C) Multiple poxvirus-like particles in skin lesions detected by transmission electron microscopy of uranyl-acetate-stained tissue sections.

A sample taken from a skin lesion tested positive for the presence of poxvirus DNA when a pan-poxvirus PCR for high-GC-content poxviruses developed by Li et al. was used [15]. Comparison of this 630-bp amplicon, which corresponded to part of the gene encoding the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase subunit rpo147 ortholog, to sequences available in public databases revealed the closest relationship, with 80% sequence identity, to members of the genus Avipoxvirus. This isolate was tentatively named "teiidaepox virus 1" (TePV-1). Cultivation in freshly isolated chicken embryo fibroblasts was attempted at different temperatures (22, 28 and 37°C), but this did not result in detectable virus replication, either by PCR testing of the supernatant or the development of a cytopathic effect. In order to characterize the virus further, we determined the sequence of the virus genome, employing a combination of Illumina sequencing technology (150-bp paired-end reads) and nanopore sequencing (MinION, Oxford Nanopore Technologies [ONT]) using DNA extracted from skin. Briefly, an aseptically dissected piece of skin containing lesions of approximately 10 mg was mechanically homogenized in 60 µl of PBS in a TissueLyser II at 30 Hz for 3 min (QIAGEN). For nanopore sequencing, 120 µl of lysis buffer was added, and the rest of the DNA preparation was performed following the manufacturer’s instructions for preparation of DNA from tissues using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit. For Illumina sequencing, DNA was extracted using an NEB genomic DNA extraction kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The quality of the DNA preparation was checked using Genomic DNA ScreenTape (Agilent) on a 4200 TapeStation (Agilent) at the VetCore genomics facility. The library for Illumina sequencing was prepared using an NEBNext Ultra II DNA Library Prep Kit (New England Biolabs) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and quality controlled using a fragment analyzer at the Vienna BioCenter Core Facilities before being sequenced using Illumina MiSeq chemistry. The raw reads were quality controlled, and adapter sequences were removed before commencing data analysis. For nanopore sequencing, the DNA was processed according to the protocol for sequencing of genomic DNA by ligation (SQK-LSK109) provided by ONT, and the library was loaded onto a Nanpore Flongle Flowcell (ONT).

Before contig assembly, the nanopore reads were aligned to the genome sequence of penguinpox virus using bowtie2-2.2.8 [16]. Nanopore reads aligning to this sequence were subsequently used for contig assembly of the Illumina reads with SPAdes 3.14.0 [17]. This straightforward approach, combining short reads with reads of up to 30 kb length, resulted in the ab initio assembly of two contigs with a length of 116,666 and 46,221 bp, respectively. These contigs had overlapping ends and could therefore easily be merged into one genome assembly with a final length of 166,425 bp and a GC content of 35.5%. The overlap between the two contigs was confirmed by site-specific PCR and Sanger sequencing. The coverage of the Illumina reads was 124 (138,058 aligned reads), and that of the nanopore sequencing reads was 125 (11,248 aligned reads out of 94,061; average length of aligned reads = 1848). The length distribution of the aligned reads and a histogram of the coverage distribution are shown Supplementary File 1.

Phylogenetic analysis of the genome sequence of TePV-1 and the amino acid sequences of the putative DNA polymerase (highest amino acid sequence identity, 74.3%, to flamingopox virus, MF678796.1) and DNA topoisomerase (highest amino acid sequence identity, 76.0%, to fowlpox virus, NC_002188.1) revealed that TePV-1 is most closely related to members of the genus Avipoxvirus (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Phylogenetic relationship of TePV-1 to other members of the subfamily Chordopoxvirinae. (A) Neighbor-joining tree based on the DNA polymerase protein sequence. (B) Neighbor-joining tree based on the DNA topoisomerase protein sequence. (C) Neighbor-joining tree of the full genome sequences based on avipoxviruses. All branches had a bootstrap value of 100. All trees were generated after multiple sequence alignment in CLC Workbench with 1,000 replicates. The GenBank accession numbers for sequences employed in this analysis are as follows: canarypox virus, NC_005309.1; eptesipox virus, NC_035460.1; flamingopox virus, MF678796.1; fowlpox virus, NC_002188.1; hypsugopox virus, MK860688.1; lumpy skin disease virus, NC_003027.1; magpiepox virus, MK903864.1; myxoma virus, NC_001132.2; Nile crocodilepox virus, DQ356948.1; penguinpox virus, KJ859677.1; pigeonpox virus: KJ801920.1; pteropox virus, NC_030656.1; saltwater crocodile poxvirus 1, MG450915.1; saltwater crocodile poxvirus 2, MG450916.1; shearwaterpox virus 1, KX857216.1; shearwaterpox virus 2, KX857215.1; squirrelpox virus, NC_022563.1; tanapox virus, EF420157.1; turkeypox virus, KP728110.2; vaccinia virus, NC_006998.1; variola virus, NC_001611.1; Yaba-like disease virus, NC_002642.1.

Using CLC Workbench, 154 open reading frames coding for ≥100 amino acids were detected, and these sequences were compared to the proteome of other avipoxviruses, using BLASTp. The results of this analysis are presented in Table 1. Apart from the presence of ankyrin repeat proteins at the very beginning and the end of the coding region of the TePV-1 genome, the ORF arrangement was the same as in other avipoxviruses, even though the TePV-1 genome is significantly shorter. Interestingly, nine reading frames coding for proteins of 101-206 aa could not be related to any other sequences based on amino acid sequence identity or the presence of conserved domains. Seven ORFs were found to encode proteins that are not related to other poxvirus proteins but are related to proteins found in eukaryotes (see Supplementary Table 1) and could have been acquired by horizontal gene transfer [18]. These sequences, as well as the assembly site of the two contigs and the transitions to the inverted terminal repeats were confirmed by specific PCR and Sanger sequencing.

Table 1.

Annotation of ORFs in the genome of TePV-1 encoding proteins larger than 100 aa. The start and end of ORFs located on the positive strand are shown in bold. The length of each ORF is given in base pairs. "Protein" indicates the highest-rated BLAST hit for this ORF, which is further specified by its accession number (GenBank no.), location in the genome (ref loc), the % amino acid sequence identity (% identity), the alignment length (ali), the e-value and the species. AC, Anolis carolinensis; CG, Cricetulus griseus; CNPV, canarypox virus; EA, Equus asinus; FePV2, pigeonpox virus; FGPV, flamingopox virus; FWPV, fowlpox virus; LA, Lingula anatina; MPPV, magpiepox virus; N., ORF number; PEPV, penguinpox virus; PM, Protobothrops mucrosquamatus; SWPV, shearwaterpox virus; TKPV, turkeypox virus

N Start End Length Protein GenBank no. ref loc % identity ali e-value Species
1 843 1463 621 SWPV1-308, conserved hypothetical protein ARF02867.1 323041..323703 59.545 220 2.43E-87 SWPV-1
2 1841 3643 1803 Ankyrin repeat family protein AUD40350.1 271364..273295 33.667 600 4.68E-93 FGPV
3 3583 4626 1044 Serpin family protein AUD40336.1 256018..257064 34.582 347 2.93E-74 FGPV
4 4670 6163 1494 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046459.1 264529..266415 41.04 519 2.61E-122 FeP2
5 6183 7934 1752 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046459.1 264529..266415 42.484 612 1.26E-157 FeP2
6 7991 8368 378 EFc-like protein ALA62542.1 185548..185937 34.711 121 2.27E-25 TKPV
7 8412 8969 558 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046231.1 281304..281861 39.572 187 8.05E-45 PEPV
8 9035 9832 798 Ankyrin repeat protein AYO89833.1 274191..275423 42.146 261 9.34E-66 FWPV
9 9321 9668 348 No similarity found
10 9853 11604 1752 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046027.1 33882..35669 46.259 588 6.97E-175 PEPV
11 11632 12234 603 Hypothetical protein YP_009046028.1 35800..36411 55.051 198 5.22E-85 PEPV
12 12608 13561 954 G-protein-coupled receptor family protein AUD40130.1 29544..30545 36.824 296 3.84E-67 FGPV
13 13541 15733 2193 alkaline phosphodiesterase AUD40134.1 33068..35515 42.665 743 0 FGPV
14 15749 16861 1113 SWPV1-041, DNase II-like protein ARF02656.1 47782..48978 41.842 380 2.09E-97 SWPV-1
15 16866 17279 414 Hypothetical protein AUD40139.1 40555..40962 52.239 134 1.03E-48 FGPV
16 17303 17776 474 Hypothetical protein ALA62391.1 22080..22559 43.312 157 4.06E-44 TKPV
17 17779 18213 435 dUTP pyrophosphatase AUD40142.1 41945..42382 68.056 144 4.29E-72 FGPV
18 18219 18749 531 B-cell lymphoma 2 AUD40143.1 42434..42961 34.078 179 2.11E-28 FGPV
19 18785 19798 1014 Serpin family protein YP_009046279.1 49969..50982 46.154 338 1.91E-111 FeP2
20 20154 21833 1680 DNA ligase AYP74252.1 247565..249259 62.186 558 0 FWPV
21 21865 22923 1059 Putative serpin AYP74251.1 246462..247523 50.992 353 1.06E-133 FWPV
22 22961 24649 1689 Semaphorin YP_009046047.1 57639..59369 48.772 570 0 PEPV
23 24724 25494 771 GNS1/SUR4 AUD40150.1 51121..51906 78.516 256 1.57E-157 FGPV
24 25547 26011 465 Late transcription factor VLTF-2 AXY04490.1 52429..52893 76.623 154 5.41E-89 FWPV
25 25648 25971 324 Rifampicin resistance protein AXY04491.1 52647..52856 76.562 64 1.14E-27 FWPV
26 26032 27693 1662 Rifampicin resistance protein ALA62402.1 33712..35373 75.769 553 0 TKPV
27 27710 28579 870 mRNA capping enzyme YP_009046288.1 61089..61958 79.585 289 1.20E-174 FeP2
28 28576 29709 1134 Class I histocompatibility antigen, F10 alpha chain-like XP_015684078.2 46 164 5.00E-20 PM
29 29667 30548 882 Major histocompatibility complex class I-related gene protein XP_008122411.1 35 172 2.00E-16 CNPV
30 30526 32436 1911 NPH-1 transcription termination factor AUD40154.1 55108..57021 78.74 635 0 FGPV
31 32409 33104 696 muT motif expression regulator YP_009046053.1 65721..66398 62.667 225 3.39E-102 PEPV
32 33088 33723 636 mutT motif containing protein AXY04496.1 58126..58821 71.226 212 3.25E-109 FWPV
33 34048 34533 486 RNA polymerase subunit RPO18 YP_009046293.1 66549..67034 83.23 161 8.20E-98 FeP2
34 34520 36421 1902 Early transcription factor small subunit AUD40159.1 60145..62046 90.047 633 0 FGPV
35 36402 38759 2358 NTPase AUD40160.1 62027..64402 79.267 791 0 FGPV
36 38788 39444 657 Uracil DNA glycosylase AXY04504.1 67861..68517 76.389 216 6.82E-127 FWPV
37 39461 40600 1140 SWPV1-075, conserved hypothetical protein ARF02682.1 81697..82893 41.071 392 1.85E-88 SWPV-1
38 40859 41215 357 Putative glutathione peroxidase QGM48717.1 80344..80754 68.908 119 1.91E-59 MPPV
39 41169 41540 372 Hypothetical protein NP_955112.1 100368..100847 44.898 98 4.02E-29 CNPV
40 41859 42653 795 Virion protein YP_009046067.1 80684..81493 47.212 269 3.94E-82 PEPV
41 42841 43218 378 Glutaredoxin ALA62425.1 53825..54202 68 125 9.15E-62 TKPV
42 43161 43859 699 Putative transcriptional elongation factor AUD40182.1 80826..81503 64 225 8.93E-102 FGPV
43 43853 44164 312 Hypothetical protein AXY04521.1 79590..79901 66.019 103 3.22E-48 FWPV
44 44188 46041 1854 SWPV1-097, putative metalloprotease ARF02699.1 95995..97896 65.561 633 0 SWPV-1
45 46028 48064 2037 RNA helicase NPH-II AYP74219.1 203411..205456 72.485 676 0 FWPV
46 48079 49338 1260 Virion core proteinase AYP74218.1 202111..203376 75.059 421 0 FWPV
47 49339 50508 1170 DNA-binding protein YP_009046080.1 94650..95822 63.333 390 0 PEPV
48 50376 50708 333 No similarity found
49 51076 51828 753 DNA-binding phosphoprotein ALA62437.1 65235..66116 50.883 283 3.47E-101 TKPV
50 52033 52968 936 DNA-binding virion protein QGM48748.1 99500..100432 81.935 310 0 MPPV
51 53112 55055 1944 Hypothetical protein AUD40195.1 92674..94644 48.558 659 0 FGPV
52 54985 55380 396 Virion core protein QGM48751.1 102503..102898 51.145 131 2.17E-47 MPPV
53 55688 58654 2967 DNA polymerase AUD40198.1 95291..98260 74.291 988 0 FGPV
54 58646 59452 807 Hypothetical protein AUD40199.1 98252..99100 71.269 268 3.94E-141 FGPV
55 59454 61169 1716 Hypothetical protein AUD40200.1 99093..100808 71.979 571 0 FGPV
56 61190 66739 5550 B22R family protein YP_009046096.1 118822..124590 47.199 1928 0 PEPV
57 64481 64939 459 No similarity found
58 66827 67372 546 RNA polymerase subunit AYP74202.1 171000..171548 79.006 181 1.84E-105 FWPV
59 67375 69501 2127 Hypothetical protein AUD40205.1 118803..120956 55.23 717 0 FGPV
60 69473 70891 1419 PolyA polymerase large subunit PAP-L YP_009046336.1 126407..127825 79.025 472 0 FeP2
61 70885 71202 318 DNA binding virion core phosphoprotein AUD40207.1 122355..122699 70.175 114 9.14E-54 FGPV
62 71281 71880 600 Hypothetical protein AYO89698.1 121669..122301 38.756 209 3.96E-46 FWPV
63 71929 72375 447 Hypothetical protein YP_009046339.1 128991..129440 81.081 148 1.22E-88 FeP2
64 72732 73865 1134 SWPV1-124, putative palmitylated EEV envelope lipase ARE67652.1 142768..143904 75.067 373 0 SWPV-1
65 73897 75696 1800 EEV maturation protein AXY04551.1 129455..131347 46.825 630 0 FWPV
66 75727 77052 1326 Ser/Thr kinase AYP74192.1 153725..155065 75.688 436 0 FWPV
67 77030 77671 642 Hypothetical protein AXY04554.1 134129..134770 69.484 213 6.53E-106 FWPV
68 78116 78655 540 HAL3 domain containing protein AXY04556.1 135430..135981 68.306 183 6.98E-96 FWPV
69 79127 79822 696 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1 alpha hydroxylase, mitochondrial XP_003216736.1 38 121 1.00E-07 AC
70 79860 80702 843 Glutamate-rich protein 3 isoform X3 XP_013402139.1 37 101 6.00E-06 LA
71 80169 80498 330 No similarity found
72 80787 82091 1305 Hypothetical protein NP_955168.1 170735..172057 60.277 433 0 CNPV
73 82286 82864 579 SWPV1-137, conserved hypothetical protein ARE67661.1 158056..158622 71.123 187 1.15E-98 SWPV-1
74 82817 83839 1023 Putative virion core protein NP_955171.1 172777..173823 77.011 348 0 CNPV
75 83894 84676 783 Late transcription factor VLTF-1 AYP74173.1 129528..130310 87.308 260 3.61E-177 FWPV
76 84681 85688 1008 Poxvirus myristoylprotein AXY04569.1 160397..161407 60.417 336 1.45E-159 FWPV
77 85689 86420 732 SWPV2-ORF161, putative myristylated IMV envelope protein ARE67397.1 201657..202388 86.364 242 4.06E-165 SWPV-2
78 86699 87607 909 Hypothetical protein YP_009046124.1 171203..172108 75.908 303 0 PEPV
79 87633 88391 759 DNA-binding virion core VP8 YP_009046362.1 156784..157545 67.984 253 1.64E-132 FeP2
80 88392 88772 381 Hypothetical protein AYO89725.1 164799..165188 62.016 129 1.32E-54 FWPV
81 88729 89169 441 Putative IMV membrane protein QGM48809.1 169617..170063 76.224 143 4.18E-80 MPPV
82 89186 90079 894 PolyA polymerase small subunit AUD40238.1 158947..159873 70.27 296 4.29E-158 FGPV
83 90076 90636 561 RNA polymerase subunit 22 AUD40239.1 159870..160430 75.275 182 3.22E-102 FGPV
84 90629 91039 411 Membrane protein AXY04578.1 166439..166852 77.686 121 4.38E-70 FWPV
85 91075 94941 3867 RNA polymerase subunit RPO147 YP_009046131.1 175641..179504 88.276 1288 0 PEPV
86 94945 95445 501 Protein tyrosine phosphatase YP_009046369.1 164161..164661 79.518 166 1.86E-100 FeP2
87 95459 96028 570 Putative viral membrane protein AXY04581.1 171281..171853 79.894 189 1.78E-117 FWPV
88 96025 96891 867 Virion envelope protein (p35) YP_009046371.1 165428..166429 50.617 324 1.64E-121 FeP2
89 96892 99279 2388 RNA polymerase-associated protein 94 AUD40245.1 166990..169389 79.099 799 0 FGPV
90 99382 99870 489 VLTF-4 YP_009046373.1 168979..169503 46.286 175 3.66E-34 FeP2
91 99871 100821 951 SWPV2-ORF177, DNA topoisomerase ARE67414.1 217385..218335 75.633 316 0 SWPV-2
92 100826 101287 462 SWPV1-166, conserved hypothetical protein ARE67699.1 196050..196511 58.17 153 5.47E-61 SWPV-1
93 101533 104082 2550 mRNA capping enzyme large subunit AXY04588.1 177778..180333 75.972 849 0 FWPV
94 104052 104474 423 CNPV194 virion protein NP_955217.1 228919..229341 56.835 139 4.89E-50 CNPV
95 104492 105904 1413 Sodium-dependent lysophosphatidylcholine symporter 1 isoform X2 XP_027254970.1 47 473 2.00E-135 CG
96 106631 107491 861 p28-like protein AYP74141.1 99505..100464 51.736 288 5.16E-114 FWPV
97 107493 108848 1356 CNPV206 putative photolyase NP_955229.1 237537..238955 65.778 450 0 CNPV
98 108875 109471 597 N1R/p28 family protein YP_009046151.1 198797..199537 33.166 199 2.99E-29 PEPV
99 109519 110163 645 CNPV209 N1R/p28-like protein NP_955232.1 240422..241354 33.005 203 9.90E-36 CNPV
100 110429 110941 513 Hypothetical protein ALA62492.1 122400..122924 34.969 163 6.26E-24 TKPV
101 110916 112124 1209 SWPV1-208, C4L/C10L-like protein ARF02782.1 232534..233796 43.796 411 1.05E-115 SWPV-1
102 110927 111544 618 No similarity found
103 112126 112803 678 Late transcription factor VLTF-3 AXY04607.1 198622..199299 88.889 225 2.66E-149 FWPV
104 113020 114966 1947 Virion core protein P4b AXY04609.1 199529..201502 80.864 648 0 FWPV
105 115027 115521 495 Immunodominant virion protein ALA62497.1 130871..131458 34.01 197 6.65E-30 TKPV
106 115560 116054 495 RNA polymerase subunit RPO19 YP_009046400.1 196511..197020 76.923 169 1.69E-89 FeP2
107 116049 117170 1122 SWPV2-ORF229, conserved hypothetical protein ARE67480.1 268134..269255 65.952 373 2.06E-179 SWPV-2
108 116797 117099 303 No similarity found
109 117173 119299 2127 Early transcription factor large subunit VETF-L AYO90282.1 203339..205468 83.216 709 0 FWPV
110 118121 118438 318 No similarity found
111 119354 120256 903 Intermediate transcription factor 3 AUD40279.1 203735..204640 79.07 301 0 FGPV
112 120449 123115 2667 Virion core protein P4a AXY04616.1 207389..210064 73.46 893 0 FWPV
113 123132 123908 777 Hypothetical protein AXY04617.1 210082..210906 74.088 274 3.08E-142 FWPV
114 123903 124352 450 Virion protein QGM48882.1 229297..229803 56.875 160 7.46E-54 MPPV
115 125401 126492 1092 Putative myristoylated membrane protein AUD40289.1 210114..211220 69.919 369 0 FGPV
116 126500 127078 579 Phosphorylated virion membrane protein AXY04624.1 213785..214381 72.727 198 2.15E-100 FWPV
117 127096 128472 1377 CNPV257 DNA helicase, transcriptional elongation NP_955280.1 286822..288210 74.891 458 0 CNPV
118 128696 129028 333 Conserved hypothetical protein QGM48893.1 234410..234748 82.143 112 1.09E-62 MPPV
119 129027 130310 1284 Processivity factor YP_009046183.1 227993..229291 59.767 430 0 PEPV
120 130313 130765 453 Holliday junction resolvase AUD40295.1 215103..215588 67.105 152 1.83E-75 FGPV
121 130785 131936 1152 Intermediate transcription factor VITF-3 QGM48896.1 236523..237674 74.413 383 0 MPPV
122 131963 135436 3474 RNA polymerase subunit RPO132 YP_009046420.1 213357..216830 90.147 1157 0 FeP2
123 135425 136993 1569 A-type inclusion like protein NP_955287.1 295207..297018 55.017 598 0 CNPV
124 135968 136303 336 No similarity found
125 137029 138375 1347 A-type inclusion protein YP_009046188.1 236280..237698 49.895 477 4.20E-170 PEPV
126 138376 138798 423 Hypothetical protein AYP74103.1 57016..57438 72.857 140 2.63E-78 FWPV
127 138802 139713 912 RNA polymerase subunit RP035 AXY04635.1 226511..227419 60.726 303 2.60E-138 FWPV
128 140010 140351 342 Hypothetical protein YP_009046427.1 221822..222163 61.947 113 6.59E-48 FeP2
129 140352 140714 363 Hypothetical protein AYP74099.1 55034..55393 45.763 118 1.49E-35 FWPV
130 140703 141446 744 Virion assembly protein YP_009046195.1 240113..241027 84.836 244 6.67E-161 PEPV
131 141490 142044 555 SWPV1-245, C-type lectin-like EEV protein ARF02806.1 267315..267863 61.932 176 4.63E-81 SWPV-1
132 142089 142520 432 Hypothetical protein NP_955296.1 302592..303416 38.095 147 4.07E-24 CNPV
133 142505 143281 777 Hypothetical protein AXY04907.1 232786..233643 48 250 1.63E-75 FWPV
134 143273 143875 603 Hypothetical protein AYP74093.1 49333..50022 37.864 206 1.42E-35 FWPV
135 143925 145406 1482 Prostacyclin synthase isoform X1 XP_008108335.1 45 486 1.00E-128 AC
136 145447 145944 498 SWPV2-ORF270, putative interleukin binding protein ARE67521.1 302929..303510 35.897 117 7.90E-11 SWPV-2
137 145928 146287 360 Epidermal growth factor like protein YP_009046207.1 251214..251585 40 100 3.24E-22 PEPV
138 146287 147168 882 Ser/Thr protein kinase ALA62528.1 164710..165612 59.932 292 7.44E-135 TKPV
139 147451 148422 972 Hypothetical protein AXY04659.1 243703..244689 48.287 321 1.65E-102 FWPV
140 148454 149758 1305 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046446.1 240328..241650 40.139 431 2.75E-99 FeP2
141 149820 152030 2211 Ankyrin repeat protein AXY05185.1 248089..250332 41.384 737 0 FWPV
142 152033 152608 576 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046450.1 247134..248219 48.408 157 7.36E-51 FeP2
143 152568 153041 474 Zinc finger protein 709-like isoform X3 XP_014701435.1 48 119 9.00E-19 EA
144 153057 154364 1308 SWPV1-279, ankyrin repeat protein ARF02838.1 294643..295941 39.25 400 4.78E-96 SWPV-1
145 154387 155430 1044 Serpin family protein AUD40336.1 256018..257064 39.093 353 2.95E-80 FGPV
146 155482 156876 1395 Ankyrin repeat family protein AUD40338.1 257748..259259 50 462 2.60E-153 FGPV
147 156861 157838 978 CNPV039 G protein-coupled receptor-like protein NP_955062.1 46721..47704 40.122 329 2.49E-85 CNPV
148 157330 157659 330 No similarity found
149 158212 159471 1260 Ankyrin repeat family protein ALA62540.1 178533..179828 33.412 422 1.17E-67 TKPV
150 159473 159784 312 Late transcription factor VLTF-1 ALA62543.1 186082..186339 31.325 83 4.97E-09 TKPV
151 159825 161417 1593 Ankyrin repeat protein YP_009046233.1 282988..284919 38.214 560 9.22E-117 PEPV
152 161398 163155 1758 SWPV2-ORF300, ankyrin repeat protein ARE67552.1 332667..334556 38.548 620 1.06E-126 SWPV-2
153 163142 164908 1767 SWPV2-ORF300, ankyrin repeat protein ARE67552.1 332667..334556 41.977 617 2.20E-157 SWPV-2
154 165195 165815 621 SWPV1-308, conserved hypothetical protein ARF02867.1 323041..323703 59.545 220 2.43E-87 SWPV-1

Poxvirus-like lesions and infections have been described in various reptiles, including crocodilians, tortoises, chameleons, and tegus [611, 19]. Despite their description in the literature, they have not yet been characterized at the genetic level, except for poxviruses in Nile and saltwater crocodiles (Nile crocodilepox virus [CRV] and saltwater crocodilepox virus subtypes 1 and 2 [SwCRV1/2], respectively) [10, 11]. This first report of the genome sequence of a poxvirus causing disease in a lizard reveals it to be most closely related to avipoxviruses. This is surprising, considering the phylogenetic distance between avian and reptilian species and the differences in homeostasis. The GC content of TePV-1 (35%) is also more similar to that of avipoxviruses than to the known crocodile-infecting poxviruses (62% for CRV, Sw-CRV-1 and -2) [10, 11]. Interestingly, the initial diagnostic PCR only was positive when a primer set for high-GC-content poxviruses was employed. This might indicate that poxviruses of Reptilia are quite variable. Therefore, additional research is warranted to examine the diversity of poxviruses of Reptilia and their species specificity and zoonotic potential.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

705_2021_4975_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13.6KB, docx)

Supplementary file1 Coverage of the assembled genome sequence for the short- and long-read next-generation sequencing approaches. The read length distribution for the long-read sequencing approach is shown (DOCX 14 KB)

705_2021_4975_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (484.9KB, jpg)

Supplementary file2 ORFs encoding proteins related to eukaryotic proteins (JPG 485 KB)

Acknowledgments

This research was supported using resources of the VetCore Facility (Transcriptomics Unit) of the University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna.

Author contributions

CR, KS and TR designed the study; MH and CH examined the animals; AKH, AL, AP and GS performed the pathological and histopathological examination; HW and ND provided the electron micrographs; and AA, AK, CR, KS and MM performed the diagnostic PCRs, generated the full genome sequence, analyzed the data and prepared the figures. CR and KS wrote the manuscript and all authors commented on it.

Funding

Open Access funding provided by University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna. It is not applicable for this publication.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Availability of data and material

The sequence of TePV-1 has been submitted to the GenBank database (accession number MT712273). The raw data are available at SRA (BioProject ID: PRJNA681025).

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Haller SL, Peng C, McFadden G, Rothenburg S. Poxviruses and the evolution of host range and virulence. Infect Genet Evol. 2014;21:15–40. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.10.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lefkowitz EJ, Wang C, Upton C. Poxviruses: Past, present and future. Virus Res. 2006;117:105–118. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2006.01.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lefkowitz EJ, Dempsey DM, Hendrickson RC, et al. Virus taxonomy: the database of the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses (ICTV) Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46:D708–D717. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Weli SC, Tryland M. Avipoxviruses: Infection biology and their use as vaccine vectors. Virol J. 2011;8:49. doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-8-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ariel E. Viruses in reptiles. Vet Res. 2011;42:1–12. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-42-100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jacobson ER, Popp JA, Shields RP, Gaskin JM. Poxlike skin lesions in captive caimans. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 1979;175:937–940. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Jacobson ER, Telford SR. Chlamydial and poxvirus infections of circulating monocytes of a flap-necked chameleon (Chamaeleo dilepis) J Wildl Dis. 1990;26:572–577. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-26.4.572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stauber E, Gogolewski R. Poxvirus dermatitis in a Tegu lizard (Tupinambis teguixin) J Zoo Wildl Med. 1990;21(2):228–230. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Penrith ML, Nesbit JW, Huchzermeyer FW. Pox virus infection in captive juvenile caimans (Caiman crocodilus fuscus) in South Africa. J S Afr Vet Assoc. 1991;62:137–139. doi: 10.4102/jsava.v62i3.1612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Afonso CL, Tulman ER, Delhon G, et al. Genome of Crocodilepox Virus. J Virol. 2006;80:4978–4991. doi: 10.1128/jvi.80.10.4978-4991.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sarker S, Isberg SR, Milic NL, et al. Molecular characterization of the first saltwater crocodilepox virus genome sequences from the world’s largest living member of the Crocodylia. Sci Rep. 2018 doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23955-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Avila-Pires TCS De (1995) Lizards of Brazilian Amazonia, Nationaal Natuurhistorisch Museum, Leiden.
  • 13.Mesquita DO, Colli GR, Costa GC, et al. At the water’s edge: ecology of semiaquatic teiids in Brazilian Amazon. J Herpetol. 2006;40:221–229. doi: 10.1670/123-05a.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tattersall GJ, Leite CAC, Sanders CE, et al. Seasonal reproductive endothermy in tegu lizards. Sci Adv. 2016;2:e1500951. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Li Y, Meyer H, Zhao H, Damon IK. GC content-based pan-pox universal PCR assays for poxvirus detection. J Clin Microbiol. 2010;48:268–276. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01697-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bankevich A, Nurk S, Antipov D, et al. SPAdes: A new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J Comput Biol. 2012;19:455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bratke KA, McLysaght A. Identification of multiple independent horizontal gene transfers into poxviruses using a comparative genomics approach. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:67. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-8-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marschang RE. Viruses infecting reptiles. Viruses. 2011;3:2087–2126. doi: 10.3390/v3112087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

705_2021_4975_MOESM1_ESM.docx (13.6KB, docx)

Supplementary file1 Coverage of the assembled genome sequence for the short- and long-read next-generation sequencing approaches. The read length distribution for the long-read sequencing approach is shown (DOCX 14 KB)

705_2021_4975_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (484.9KB, jpg)

Supplementary file2 ORFs encoding proteins related to eukaryotic proteins (JPG 485 KB)


Articles from Archives of Virology are provided here courtesy of Springer

RESOURCES