Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Mar 11;10(10):e00083-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00083-21

Complete Genome Sequence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Siphophage Salva

Brandi Jefferson a, Guichun Yao b, James Clark c, Tram Le a, Carlos Gonzalez b, Mei Liu c, Ben Burrowes c,✉
Editor: John J Dennehyd
PMCID: PMC7953286  PMID: 33707323

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative pathogen causing severe and often refractory illnesses such as pneumonia and bacteremia. We present the genome of phage Salva, a novel S. maltophilia phage that is not closely related to any phages currently deposited in GenBank. The genome is 60,789 bp, containing 102 putative protein-coding genes.

ABSTRACT

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is a Gram-negative pathogen causing severe and often refractory illnesses such as pneumonia and bacteremia. We present the genome of phage Salva, a novel S. maltophilia phage that is not closely related to any phages currently deposited in GenBank. The genome is 60,789 bp, containing 102 putative protein-coding genes.

ANNOUNCEMENT

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging, Gram-negative, pathogenic bacterium that is often multidrug resistant and is found in environments like animal by-products, food waste, and other water sources (1). Infections of S. maltophilia are normally acquired nosocomially, can cause significant life-threatening conditions like pneumonia and bacteremia, and are associated with high mortality rates among certain populations of patients (2). Antibiotic-refractory S. maltophilia infections are difficult to treat, so further studies into alternative treatment options, such as phage therapy, are necessary.

Phage Salva was isolated in 2019 from a wastewater sample collected in Cincinnati, Ohio, by enriching the sample using a multidrug-resistant S. maltophilia clinical isolate obtained from human sputum in Decatur, GA, as the host strain aerobically grown at 30°C in nutrient broth (BD), followed by plaque purification (3, 4). To purify the genomic DNA, the modified Promega Wizard DNA cleanup kit protocol was used (5). An Illumina TruSeq Nano low-throughput kit was used to prepare DNA libraries, which were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument with paired-end 300-bp reads using 500-cycle v2 chemistry. A total of 788,720 raw reads were visualized using FastQC v0.11.9 (www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc) and then manually trimmed using the FastX Toolkit v0.0.14 (http://hannonlab.cshl.edu/fastx_toolkit). The genome was closed by PCR (with 5′-ATCGCATCTTCGTCCTTTCC-3′ and 5′-CTTGTGGCGAAGGTATTCCA-3′ as the primer set) and confirmed to be complete by Sanger sequencing. Structural annotations were completed using GLIMMER v3 and MetaGeneAnnotator v1.0 (6, 7). tRNAs were detected with ARAGORN v2.36 (8). To calculate genome-wide sequence similarity, progressiveMauve v2.4 was used (9). Gene functions were predicted using InterProScan v5.33, BLAST v2.9.0, and TMHMM v2.0 (10–12). The sequence similarity search was set at an E value of <0.001 against the NCBI nonredundant and Swiss-Prot/TrEMBL databases. All annotation tools were used with their default settings and hosted (except HHpred) by the Center for Phage Technology (CPT) (https://cpt.tamu.edu/galaxy-pub) (13–15).

Phage Salva has a 60,789-bp genome with a GC content of 56.4%, in comparison to its host genome, which has a GC content of 66.7% (16). A long terminal repeat region (3,973 bp) is predicted by PhageTerm (17) analysis. Phage Salva has one tRNA and 102 putative protein-coding genes, of which 24 have predicted function. Genes that are normally associated with the lysogenic life cycle were not identified in the Salva genome. Salva was predicted to be a siphovirus based on genomic analysis, which was confirmed visually by transmission electron micrography. Salva contains two predicted tape measure chaperone genes, not linked by a programed transcriptional frameshift as is common in many tailed phages (18, 19). A typical Gram-negative lysis cassette was identified in the Salva genome, consisting of a class I holin, an antiholin, an endopeptidase endolysin, and a bimolecular spanin complex (20). Comparative genomic analysis revealed that Salva is not closely related to any known phages or prophage elements currently deposited in GenBank. The only phage that is related to phage Salva is Stenotrophomonas phage vB_SmaS_BUCT548 (GenBank accession number MN937349.1), which shares 74.3% nucleotide identity over 55% coverage (distributed across the Salva genome), as determined by BLASTn.

Data availability.

The Salva genome is deposited under GenBank accession number MW393850. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample accession numbers are PRJNA222858, SRR11558346, and SAMN14609643, respectively.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by funding from the National Science Foundation (awards EF-0949351 and DBI-1565146). Additional support came from the CPT, an Initial University Multidisciplinary Research Initiative supported by Texas A&M University and Texas A&M AgriLife Research, and from the Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics of Texas A&M University.

This announcement was prepared in partial fulfillment of the requirements for BICH464 Phage Genomics, an undergraduate course at Texas A&M University.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Brooke JS. 2012. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: an emerging global opportunistic pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 25:2–41. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00019-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moc C. 2020. Current and potential treatment options for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections. Contagion Live 5:10–11. https://cdn.sanity.io/files/0vv8moc6/contagion/89806526aa730c16865f7a2fa841d15a54338ebc.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.van Charante F, Holtappels D, Blasdel B, Burrowes B. 2019. Isolation of bacteriophages. In Harper D, Abedon S, Burrowes B, McConville M (ed), Bacteriophages. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-40598-8_14-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cross T, Schoff C, Chudoff D, Graves L, Broomell H, Terry K, Farina J, Correa A, Shade D, Dunbar D. 2015. An optimized enrichment technique for the isolation of Arthrobacter bacteriophage species from soil sample isolates. J Vis Exp 52781. doi: 10.3791/52781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Summer EJ. 2009. Preparation of a phage DNA fragment library for whole genome shotgun sequencing. Methods Mol Biol 502:27–46. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-565-1_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Delcher AL, Harmon D, Kasif S, White O, Salzberg SL. 1999. Improved microbial gene identification with GLIMMER. Nucleic Acids Res 27:4636–4641. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.23.4636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Noguchi H, Taniguchi T, Itoh T. 2008. MetaGeneAnnotator: detecting species-specific patterns of ribosomal binding site for precise gene prediction in anonymous prokaryotic and phage genomes. DNA Res 15:387–396. doi: 10.1093/dnares/dsn027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laslett D, Canback B. 2004. ARAGORN, a program to detect tRNA genes and tmRNA genes in nucleotide sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 32:11–16. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL. 2009. BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinformatics 10:421. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, Pesseat S, Quinn AF, Sangrador-Vegas A, Scheremetjew M, Yong S-Y, Lopez R, Hunter S. 2014. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics 30:1236–1240. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Krogh A, Larsson B, von Heijne G, Sonnhammer EL. 2001. Predicting transmembrane protein topology with a hidden Markov model: application to complete genomes. J Mol Biol 305:567–580. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dunn NA, Unni DR, Diesh C, Munoz-Torres M, Harris NL, Yao E, Rasche H, Holmes IH, Elsik CG, Lewis SE. 2019. Apollo: democratizing genome annotation. PLoS Comput Biol 15:e1006790. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jalili V, Afgan E, Gu Q, Clements D, Blankenberg D, Goecks J, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A. 2020. Corrigendum: the Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2020 update. Nucleic Acids Res 48:8205–8207. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ramsey J, Rasche H, Maughmer C, Criscione A, Mijalis E, Liu M, Hu JC, Young R, Gill JJ. 2020. Galaxy and Apollo as a biologist-friendly interface for high-quality cooperative phage genome annotation. PLoS Comput Biol 16:e1008214. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Crossman LC, Gould VC, Dow JM, Vernikos GS, Okazaki A, Sebaihia M, Saunders D, Arrowsmith C, Carver T, Peters N, Adlem E, Kerhornou A, Lord A, Murphy L, Seeger K, Squares R, Rutter S, Quail MA, Rajandream M-A, Harris D, Churcher C, Bentley SD, Parkhill J, Thomson NR, Avison MB. 2008. The complete genome, comparative and functional analysis of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia reveals an organism heavily shielded by drug resistance determinants. Genome Biol 9:R74. doi: 10.1186/gb-2008-9-4-r74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garneau JR, Depardieu F, Fortier LC, Bikard D, Monot M. 2017. PhageTerm: a tool for fast and accurate determination of phage termini and packaging mechanism using next-generation sequencing data. Sci Rep 7:8292. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07910-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu J, Hendrix RW, Duda RL. 2004. Conserved translational frameshift in dsDNA bacteriophage tail assembly genes. Mol Cell 16:11–21. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xu J, Hendrix RW, Duda RL. 2014. Chaperone-protein interactions that mediate assembly of the bacteriophage lambda tail to the correct length. J Mol Biol 426:1004–1018. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2013.06.040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cahill J, Young R. 2019. Phage lysis: multiple genes for multiple barriers. Adv Virus Res 103:33–70. doi: 10.1016/bs.aivir.2018.09.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The Salva genome is deposited under GenBank accession number MW393850. The associated BioProject, SRA, and BioSample accession numbers are PRJNA222858, SRR11558346, and SAMN14609643, respectively.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES