Skip to main content
Microbiology Resource Announcements logoLink to Microbiology Resource Announcements
. 2021 Mar 11;10(10):e01217-20. doi: 10.1128/MRA.01217-20

Complete Annotated Genome Sequence of the Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium LT7 Strain STK003, Historically Used in Gene Transfer Studies

Julie Zaworski a, Anne Guichard a,*, Alexey Fomenkov a, Richard D Morgan a, Elisabeth A Raleigh a,
Editor: Vincent Brunob
PMCID: PMC7953296  PMID: 33707333

The genome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT7 comprises a chromosome and two plasmids. One plasmid is very close to pSLT of Salmonella Typhimurium LT2; the second harbors a shufflon region. Prophage content is distinct: LT7 lacks Fels-1, while Gifsy-1 and Fels-2 show island-like divergence and likely programmed inversion, respectively.

ABSTRACT

The genome of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT7 comprises a chromosome and two plasmids. One plasmid is very close to pSLT of Salmonella Typhimurium LT2; the second harbors a shufflon region. Prophage content is distinct: LT7 lacks Fels-1, while Gifsy-1 and Fels-2 show island-like divergence and likely programmed inversion, respectively.

ANNOUNCEMENT

The isolates Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium LT7 and LT2 were early model organisms for the study of gene transfer (13). Salmonella taxonomy has varied (4); these two lysotypes differ in prophage content (5). Isolates of LT2 were found to be more genetically stable than those of LT7 (6), which remains a model for its mutator properties (6, 7). Our LT7 isolate, STK003, was MST1656 from Stanley Maloy.

A Pacific Biosciences RS II instrument and the SMRT Analysis pipeline were used for sequencing, contig assembly, and modification analysis as described in reference 8. Briefly, cells were grown in LB and harvested, and DNA was then isolated with phenol-chloroform (9). A SMRTbell library was constructed from 5 µg sheared (Covaris g-TUBE, 5 to 10 kb) DNA; sequencing used polymerase 6, chemistry 4. A total of 1,964 Mb of sequence in 131,952 polymerase reads with mean subread lengths of 3,046 bp and an N50 subread length of 4,016 bp was obtained (∼329× coverage). Assembly (RS_HGAP_Assembly.3; smrtanalysis_2.3.0.140936.p5.167094) specified a 5-Mb expected genome size, minimum subread length (MSL) of 1,000 bp, minimum read accuracy of 0.80, and minimum polymerase read length (MPRL) of 1,000 bp (other parameters were at default settings). Three contigs resulted with sizes of 4,835,584 bp, 115,234 bp, and 109,793 bp. The overall structure was rechecked with RS_HGAP3, resulting in an MSL of 3,000 bp and an MPRL of 9,000 bp.

Annotation, manipulation, and analysis employed Geneious_9.1.8 (Biomatters) with the options “Annotate_from_Database” (resulting in a 100% DNA match to the genome sequences found under the GenBank accession numbers AE006468, AE006471, and NZ_CP012929), “Sequence,” and “change residue numbering.” Circularization employed reference 10 or the procedure described in reference 11, File S1. Coordinates were set to agree with the reference origins. The final circular polished (Quiver) assemblies were a chromosome (4,817,454 bp) and two plasmids (93,946 bp and 88,171 bp). The GC contents are, respectively, 52.2%, 53.1%, and 50%.

The 4.8-Mb chromosome of STK003 shows 98.8% nucleotide identity to LT2 (MAFFT [12]). One plasmid is a close relative of pSLT of LT2; the second most closely resembles p12-4374_96 from Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg (GenBank accession number NZ_CP012929). LT7 lacks prophage Fels-1, which is expected from the lysotype (13, 14). Prophages Fels-2 and Gifsy-1 of the two strains differ in important respects. Gifsy-1 carries a substitution of ∼7.5 kb between LT2 loci STM2620 and STM2630, likely from a different prophage (e.g., serovar Newport [GenBank accession number CP025230]). In contrast, Gifsy-2 is almost identical to the LT2 copy. Inversion of a Fels-2 tail fiber gene (Fig. 1; from the Geneious_Prime_2020.2.4 implementation of Mauve [15]) likely was mediated by pin homolog ITP16_13610 (LT2 locus tag STM2702) (16). Alternative host ranges are conferred by similar inversions mediated by cin of phage P1 and gin of phage Mu (17) and possibly pin of the e14 prophage-like element. The second plasmid harbors an ∼2-kb region related to shufflons of IncI conjugal plasmids, which employ site-specific recombination to generate variation in pilus protein adhesion specificity (18, 19).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Inversion of candidate phage tail fiber coding sequence of Fels-2. Colored blocks represent segments of matching sequence (LCB), with genome coordinates above the blocks. Blocks above the horizontal lines have identity on the same strand; for the one below it, the bottom strand is identical to the top strand of its homolog. Accession numbers are below the horizontal lines; below that are open boxes labeled with locus tags of predicted coding DNA sequences (CDS). CDS STM2702 of LT2 (GenBank accession number AE006468) and its identical homolog, ITP16_13610 (fin) of LT7 (CP064263), adjoin the inversion. Alternative C-terminal segments are fused to identical N termini for STM2703 and ITP16_13615; similarly, identical N termini of STM2706 and ITP16_13630 are fused to alternative C termini. (We observe that notes in the LT2 sequence misleadingly describe STM2703 as similar to pin of e14; a more extensive description of STM2702 accurately notes similarity to site-specific recombinases and invertases.)

The methylation phenotype (from RS_Modification_and_Motif_Analysis) and genotype agree with activities expected for the serovar (Table 1), confirming functionality of methyltransferase (MTase) open reading frames (ORFs). No major single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were found in the restriction-modification (R-M) systems. Partial activity of M.SenLT2IV orthologs was previously reported for LT2 and other Salmonella enterica serovars (20).

TABLE 1.

Methylation specificity of DNA MTases in Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium LT7a

MTaseb Motifc Type of modification Sites with IPD > 2 (%)d
M.SenLT7I (StyLT) 5′ CAG*AG 3′ m6A 99.2
M.SenLT7III (StySA) 5′ GATC*AG 3′ m6A 99.3
M.SenLT7II (StySB) 5′ G*AGNNNNNNRTAYG 3′
3′ CTCNNNNNNY*ATRC 5′
m6A 98.8
100
M.Dam 5′ G*ATC 3′ m6A 99.7
M.Dcm 5′ C*CWGG 3′ (m5C) 0.3
M.SenLT7IV 5′ ATGC*AT 3′ m6A 54.9
a

The PacBio technology does not detect m5C accurately.

b

For MTases associated with restriction activities (R-M), synonyms found in the restriction literature are in parentheses.

c

Modified sequence motifs (* precedes the methylated base).

d

The percentage of recognition sites that were methylated. IPD, interpulse duration (23).

Data availability.

The genome sequences described here have been deposited under GenBank accession numbers CP064263 to CP064265 (assembly number ASM1547561v1) (PGAP annotated [21, 22]) and SRA numbers SRR12788408 and SRR12788409.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Stanley Maloy and Anca Segall (San Diego State University) for Salmonella strains and phages and advice and training in their use.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Miyake T. 1962. Exchange of genetic material between Salmonella Typhimurium and Escherichia coli K-12. Genetics 47:1043–1052. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.8.1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Colson AM, Colson C, Van Pel A. 1969. Host-controlled restriction mutants of Salmonella typhimurium. J Gen Microbiol 58:57–64. doi: 10.1099/00221287-58-1-57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Colson C, Colson AM. 1971. A new Salmonella typhimurium DNA host specificity. J Gen Microbiol 69:345–351. doi: 10.1099/00221287-69-3-345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Brenner FW, Villar RG, Angulo FJ, Tauxe R, Swaminathan B. 2000. Salmonella nomenclature. J Clin Microbiol 38:2465–2467. doi: 10.1128/JCM.38.7.2465-2467.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zinder ND, Lederberg J. 1952. Genetic exchange in Salmonella. J Bacteriol 64:679–699. doi: 10.1128/JB.64.5.679-699.1952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gong J, Liu WQ, Liu GR, Chen F, Li JQ, Xu GM, Wang L, Johnston RN, Eisenstark A, Liu SL. 2007. Spontaneous conversion between mutL and 6 bpΔmutL in Salmonella typhimurium LT7: association with genome diversification and possible roles in bacterial adaptation. Genomics 90:542–549. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2007.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Koch WH, Henrikson E, Eisenstadt E, Cebula TA. 1995. Salmonella typhimurium LT7 and LT2 strains carrying the imp operon on ColIa. J Bacteriol 177:1903–1905. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.7.1903-1905.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stenmark B, Harrison OB, Eriksson L, Anton BP, Fomenkov A, Roberts RJ, Tooming-Klunderud A, Bratcher HB, Bray JE, Thulin-Hedberg S, Maiden MCJ, Mölling P. 2020. Complete genome and methylome analysis of Neisseria meningitidis associated with increased serogroup Y disease. Sci Rep 10:3644. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59509-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hunt M, Silva ND, Otto TD, Parkhill J, Keane JA, Harris SR. 2015. Circlator: automated circularization of genome assemblies using long sequencing reads. Genome Biol 16:2601. doi: 10.1186/s13059-015-0849-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kingston AW, Roussel-Rossin C, Dupont C, Raleigh EA. 2015. Novel recA-independent horizontal gene transfer in Escherichia coli K-12. PLoS One 10:e0130813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0130813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H. 2009. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol Biol 537:39–64. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.McClelland M, Sanderson KE, Spieth J, Clifton SW, Latreille P, Courtney L, Porwollik S, Ali J, Dante M, Du F, Hou S, Layman D, Leonard S, Nguyen C, Scott K, Holmes A, Grewal N, Mulvaney E, Ryan E, Sun H, Florea L, Miller W, Stoneking T, Nhan M, Waterston R, Wilson RK. 2001. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852–856. doi: 10.1038/35101614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liu GR, Edwards K, Eisenstark A, Fu YM, Liu WQ, Sanderson KE, Johnston RN, Liu SL. 2003. Genomic diversification among archival strains of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT7. J Bacteriol 185:2131–2142. doi: 10.1128/jb.185.7.2131-2142.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Darling ACE, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. 2004. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 14:1394–1403. doi: 10.1101/gr.2289704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mehta P, Casjens S, Krishnaswamy S. 2004. Analysis of the lambdoid prophage element e14 in the E. coli K-12 genome. BMC Microbiol 4:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-4-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Grindley NDF, Whiteson KL, Rice PA. 2006. Mechanisms of site-specific recombination. Annu Rev Biochem 75:567–605. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.73.011303.073908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Gyohda A, Funayama N, Komano T. 1997. Analysis of DNA inversions in the shufflon of plasmid R64. J Bacteriol 179:1867–1871. doi: 10.1128/jb.179.6.1867-1871.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Brouwer MSM, Tagg KA, Mevius DJ, Iredell JR, Bossers A, Smith HE, Partridge SR. 2015. IncI shufflons: assembly issues in the next-generation sequencing era. Plasmid 80:111–117. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2015.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Pirone-Davies C, Hoffmann M, Roberts RJ, Muruvanda T, Timme RE, Strain E, Luo Y, Payne J, Luong K, Song Y, Tsai YC, Boitano M, Clark TA, Korlach J, Evans PS, Allard MW. 2015. Genome-wide methylation patterns in Salmonella enterica Subsp. enterica Serovars. PLoS One 10:e0123639. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Haft DH, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Brover V, Chetvernin V, O'Neill K, Li W, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Lu F, Marchler GH, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Zheng C, Thibaud-Nissen F, Geer LY, Marchler-Bauer A, Pruitt KD. 2018. RefSeq: an update on prokaryotic genome annotation and curation. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D851–D860. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx1068. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Flusberg BA, Webster DR, Lee JH, Travers KJ, Olivares EC, Clark TA, Korlach J, Turner SW. 2010. Direct detection of DNA methylation during single-molecule, real-time sequencing. Nat Methods 7:461–465. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The genome sequences described here have been deposited under GenBank accession numbers CP064263 to CP064265 (assembly number ASM1547561v1) (PGAP annotated [21, 22]) and SRA numbers SRR12788408 and SRR12788409.


Articles from Microbiology Resource Announcements are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES