Abstract
Preterm birth is a complex syndrome and remains a substantial public health problem globally. Its common complications include periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Despite great advances in the comprehension of the pathogenesis and improvements in neonatal intensive care and associated medicine, preterm birth-related diseases remain essentially without adequate treatment and can lead to high morbidity and mortality. The therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) appears promising as evidenced by their efficacy in preclinical models of pathologies relevant to premature infant complications. MSC-based therapeutic efficacy is closely associated with MSC secretomes and a subsequent paracrine action response to tissue injuries, which are complex and abundant in response to the local microenvironment. In the current review, we summarize the paracrine mechanisms of MSC secretomes underlying diverse preterm birth-related diseases, including PVL, BPD, NEC and ROP, are summarized, and focus is placed on MSC-conditioned media (CM) and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) as key mediators of modulatory action, thereby providing new insights for future therapies in newborn medicine.
Keywords: Extracellular vesicles, Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells, Premature infant disease, Secretome
Introduction
Preterm birth, defined by the World Health Organization as birth before 37 weeks of pregnancy, is a complex syndrome and remains a substantial global public health problem [1,2]. Approximately 15 million babies are born preterm annually [3], accounting for 11% of all live births worldwide [4]. However, the rate of preterm births varies from 5 to 6% in several European nations to ≥15% in some parts of Africa [4]. In 2013, Guo et al. [5] investigated the birth outcomes of pregnant women from 132 cities in China and found that 7.2% of live births were preterm. The incidence of preterm birth is continuously increasing in many countries [6]. Another study performed by Chawanpaiboon et al. [7] estimated that the global preterm birth rate was between 8.3 and 10.9% in 2000 and between 9.0 and 12.0% in 2014. Additionally, premature labor directly leads to approximately 1 million neonatal deaths annually, contributing to a major cause of childhood morbidity [8].
Severe complications of prematurity include bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). The poor outcomes of these diseases have improved over the past decade due to significant advances in neonatal intensive care, especially for premature newborns, and the use of glucocorticoids and pulmonary surfactants. At present, the clinical treatment of premature diseases mainly includes auxiliary ventilation, drug therapy, supportive therapy and surgical treatment [9–11]. For example, the application of glucocorticoid in BPD can inhibit the occurrence of inflammatory reaction, reduce bronchial and pulmonary edema, promote the production of antioxidant enzymes and pulmonary surfactants in the lung, rapidly improve lung function and help to remove the ventilator as soon as possible [12]. However, many studies have reported that glucocorticoid can increase the risk of adverse reactions, such as those by the nervous system, in the early or late stages, and its dose and course of treatment are not certain [13,14]. In terms of surgical treatment, preterm infants with surgical NEC are at risk of significant growth reduction and neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), including cerebral palsy, deafness and blindness [15,16]. These sequelae and complications of prematurity-related diseases affect not only the neonatal period, but also infancy and childhood, and even adolescence and adulthood [17–19]. Currently, although various treatment methods have been found to achieve certain curative effects, there still exist several side effects and disputes above. Thus, it is necessary to explore and develop new therapies for the treatment and prevention of premature infant diseases.
Accumulating studies have established the importance and feasibility of stem cell-based therapies to ameliorate many degenerative and inflammatory diseases. Among these stem/progenitor cell types, mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) have received more extensive attention because they are easily extracted, exert anti-inflammatory effects, have low immunogenicity and can renew themselves. The therapeutic potential of MSCs has been demonstrated in many diseases such as cancer [20,21] and cardiovascular [22,23] and lung [24–26] diseases. MSCs also represent a promising and growing approach to the targeting of various pathological processes and cellular impairments underlying the major abnormalities in premature infant and preterm-associated neonatal diseases [27–29]. Therefore, the mechanisms of MSC action have been hypothesized and researched. Initially, MSCs were thought to work via regenerative effects by homing to injured tissues to engraft and replace damaged cells. However, evidence suggests that the benefits of MSCs are primarily derived from their secretomes and paracrine action [30–33], which exert immunomodulatory, anti-inflammatory, angiogenic, antibacterial and proregenerative effects. This review summarizes the effects of MSC secretomes in diverse preterm birth-related diseases, including PVL, BPD, NEC and ROP, and focuses on MSC-conditioned media (CM) and MSC-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) as the key mediators of modulatory action, thereby providing new insight for future therapies in newborn medicine.
Characterization of MSCs and their secretomes
Since MSCs were first reported as being derived from human bone marrow (BM) in 1999 [34], they have been isolated from multiple tissues, including adipose tissue, amniotic fluid, umbilical cord blood, umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly, placental amnion, and placenta [35–37]. Unlike the strong differentiation potential of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) into various cells from three embryonic germ layers, MSCs can multidifferentiate and be induced into mesenchymal cells, adipose tissue, skeletal muscle cells, bone, and cartilage [38]. The characteristics of MSCs include being plastic-adherent and presenting a typical fibroblast phenotype. Further, they can differentiate into adipocytes, osteoblasts, and chondroblasts in vitro under the appropriate conditions and simultaneously express surface antigens such as CD105, CD90, and CD73; however, they lack CD34, CD45, CD14, CD19, and HLA-DR markers [35,36]. Researchers initially assumed that MSCs benefit cells by homing to damaged cells; however, studies gradually found that the transplanted cells either did not differentiate into resident injured cells, or their survival rate was very low [39]. Previous studies have suggested that the MSC-derived cell-free secretomes may be responsible for many of the properties and effects of MSCs. MSC-derived secretomes primarily include bioactive factors and cell-secreted vesicles which can be secreted into extracellular fluid, and then into the blood [40]. These biomolecules can be divided into the following categories, and have protective functions in different tissues: (1) angiogenesis factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), insulin-like growth factor (IGF-1), and hepatocyte growth factor (HGF); (2) anti-apoptotic factors, such as basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), transforming growth factor (TGF), and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF); (3) anti-inflammatory factors, such as TNF-a-stimulated gene/protein (TSG), interleukin (IL-10), and heme oxygenase (HO) [41,42]. Additionally, soluble factors such as immunoregulatory protein produced by cells can be found to be sealed in vesicles [43]. These secretomes can mediate diverse functions via a cross-talk between different cell types, and are easily affected by organism environment in vivo [44–46]. Many studies have profiled secretomes on the CM and EVs derived from in vitro cultures [47] to identify the components responsible for the beneficial effects of MSC-derived secretomes. In the present study, the focus is placed on these two aspects.
MSC-derived CM
The cell-free CM derived from MSCs is enriched in various soluble factors, including growth factors, immunomodulatory molecules, cytokines, and chemokines [40,48,49]. MSC-derived CM has shown to have beneficial effects both in vivo and in vitro [50–53]. In addition, preconditioning strategies such as the environmental variations and stimulatory conditions of MSCs can change the composition of CM active factors and influence the CM’s therapeutic effect. Waszak et al. [54] showed that after preconditioning in hyperoxic conditions (95% oxygen), stanniocalcin-1 (STC1) expression significantly increased in MSC-derived CM as compared with that in the normoxic group. Jun et al. [55] revealed that VEGF and TGF β 1 (TGF-β1) expressions increased in either amniotic fluid-derived MSCs (AF-MSCs) or AF-MSC-derived CM in response to hypoxic conditions. Further, hypoxic MSC-derived CM accelerated human dermal fibroblast migration and proliferation compared with that of normal CM [55]. In addition, tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α)-preconditioned MSC-derived CM has been found to accelerate proliferation, angiogenesis, wound closure, and the infiltration of immune cells into cutaneous wounds in vivo [56]. Chemokine, cytokine, and protease secretions are increased in MSC-derived CM after TNF-α-pretreatment, as revealed by proteomic analysis [57]. Bartosh et al. [58] observed that the secretion of anti-inflammatory molecules, namely TNF-α-stimulated gene-6 (TSG-6) and STC-1, by MSCs was increased after three-dimensional spheroid culturing, which decreased inflammation in vivo and macrophage activation in vitro. In addition, TGF-β and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) stimulation [30], the overexpression of angiopoietin-1 [59], HO-1 or other genes [43], and neutralizing antibodies can also change the secretory composition of MSCs and affect their functions.
MSC-derived EVs: A therapeutic vector of MSCs?
EVs, including exosomes, microvesicles and apoptotic bodies, have been identified as mediators in various physiological and pathophysiological processes [60]. Current studies have revealed that EVs act on target cells by fusing with the target membrane to enter the cell and release the cellular contents, interacting with the receptor–ligand, and inducing the target cells to ingest exosomes via endocytosis [61,62]. Accumulating evidence has shown that MSC-derived EVs effectively restore injured organs and tissues, such as the kidneys, heart, liver, and brain, in animal models, and the substance contained in EVs may play a role in their functioning [60,63,64]. Wang et al. [65] reported that MSC-derived EVs significantly promoted angiogenesis and cardiac function via miR-210 in a mouse myocardial infarction model. Ahn et al. [65,66] explained that the EVs released from MSCs, but not from MSCs with VEGF knockdown, reduced hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced rat alveolar epithelial cell (L2 cell) death in vitro and improved impaired alveolarization, angiogenesis, and inflammatory response in the lungs of hyperoxia-induced rats. This demonstrates that EV-transferred VEGF may be a key paracrine factor that induces protective effects [66]. These observations help explain the therapeutic benefits of EVs in diseases, which may further lead to potential treatments for premature infant diseases.
EVs, once considered cellular debris, range in size from 50 to 200 nm in diameter, are much smaller than cells in diameter (10–30 µm) but larger than proteins, thereby making it difficult to define and isolate them [61]. As analytical technologies for EV detection have improved, investigators have differentiated EVs into three types, namely exosomes, microvesicles, and apobodies, according to their size and morphology [61]. Among them, exosomes have received the most attention from researchers. Exosomes, range in size from 30 to 100 nm in diameter and are membranous particles secreted by MSCs [67]. Mass spectrometry and sequencing analyses have revealed that exosomes secreted by MSCs from different origins share similar constitutions, including DNA, lncRNA, tRNA (transfer RNA), microRNA, and proteins [67,68]. The functions and regulatory pathways of exosome-derived miRNAs and proteins from MSCs have been fully characterized. For miRNAs, Mao et al. [69] demonstrated that exosomes secreted by MSCs that overexpress miR-92a-3p maintained articular chondrocyte functions in vitro and reduced cartilage matrix loss in an osteoarthritis (OA) mouse model by decreasing the expressions of collagen type II α 1 (COL2A1), and aggrecan in cartilage. Shi et al. [70] observed that miR-21 was more highly enriched in exosomes derived from H2O2-treated BM-MSCs as compared with that of normal MSC-derived exosomes. Additionally, Fang et al. [71] demonstrated that UC-MSC-derived exosomes enriched in specific microRNAs (miR-21, miR-23a, miR-125b, and miR-145) played key roles in promoting myofibroblast formation during wound healing. The proteins contained in exosomes also have crucial functions in alleviating organ damage. Wang et al. demonstrated that exosomes secreted by indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO)-overexpressing BM-MSCs (IDO-BM-MSCs) up-regulated the immunoregulatory protein four-and-a-half LIM domain 1 (FHL-1), and that these exosomes reduced the immunoreaction after transplantation and improved cardiac allograft function in rats that received transplants [43]. Yan et al. demonstrated that human umbilical cord MSC (hUC-MSC) exosomes promoted hepatocyte recovery from oxidative stress via the antioxidant and antiapoptotic effects of exosomal glutathione peroxidase1 (GPX1) both in vitro and in vivo, however, GPX1 knockdown was found to delay this hepatoprotective effect [72]. MSC exosomes have also been reported to mediate several known functions of MSCs in premature infant diseases, including modulating inflammatory/immune responses and reducing fibrosis, apoptosis, and oxidative stress [73–76]. However, more in-depth research is required to explore the mechanisms underlying the effects of exosomes.
MSC-derived secretomes as a therapeutic strategy for premature diseases
MSC-derived secretomes for BPD therapy
BPD is a serious long-term complication of preterm birth that leads to significant morbidity and mortality during the neonatal period and is a leading cause of chronic lung disease in children. The incidence of BPD in surviving infants aged ≤ 28 gestational weeks has remained approximately 40% over the last few decades [77–79]. A retrospective study found that the survival rates of infants aged 22–28 gestational weeks has increased from 70 to 79% over the past 20 years in the U.S.A., while the incidence of BPD increased from 32 to 45% [80]. In 2017, in Jiangsu, China, the survival rate for babies with BPD and very low birth weights was 24.9% [81]. However, all present approaches for BPD, including ventilation, oxygen supplementation, fluid intake, nutrition, glucocorticoids, surfactants, vitamin A, and caffeine remain supportive [9]. Thus, further studies are necessary to explore new treatments for BPD, such as cell-based therapy.
Early clinical trials (NCT01297205 [82] and NCT01632475 [83]) have demonstrated the therapeutic effects of MSC engraftment in the treatment of BPD. Accumulating evidence has shown that MSC-derived secretomes may be a potential therapy for BPD (Table 1). MSC-derived CM has also been found to improve BPD-associated vascular injury and parenchyma in vivo [54,84–86]. Several studies have indicated that soluble factors, such as macrophage colony-stimulating factor 1, osteopontin [86], and STC1 [54], may be principally responsible for the therapeutic abilities of MSC-derived CM. MSC-derived EV [87] and exosome [73,74,88] treatments also block inflammation and reduce fibrosis and pulmonary vascular remodeling, resulting in improved lung function and the amelioration of pulmonary hypertension in hyperoxia-induced BPD. Willis et al. [73] showed that MSC-derived exosomes modulated the lung macrophage phenotype by suppressing the pro-inflammatory ‘M1’ state and enhancing an anti-inflammatory ‘M2-like’ state both in vitro and in vivo. Interestingly, another study demonstrated the repair effect of MSC-derived exosomes in a BPD animal model [74]. MSC-derived exosomes can repair the lung injury and improve BPD-associated brain injury as revealed by decreased brain cell death and reversed hypomyelination. TSG-6 has also been detected in MSC-derived exosome fractions and can decrease the pro-inflammatory cytokines, IL-6, TNF-α, and IL-1β; it can also decrease cell death in lungs and reverse BPD-associated cardiac and brain pathologies in BPD mouse models. However, the knockdown of TSG-6 in MSC-derived exosomes abolishes the therapeutic effects of the exosomes [74]. Furthermore, Braun et al. [88] demonstrated that MSC-derived exosomes in vitro stimulated the extensive capillary network formation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) in vitro, but this function was diminished by anti-VEGF antibodies. The presence of the VEGF protein has also been revealed in the MSC-derived CM, but not in the exosome-depleted media [88]. Increased comprehension of the MSC-derived secretomes will contribute to the development of new strategies for BPD therapy.
Table 1. Summary of therapeutic benefits of MSC secretome in premature diseases.
MSCs source | Injury model | Outcomes | Key factor | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|
Human WJ-MSC | Neonatal mouse BPD-Hyperoxia |
Improved pulmonary development ↓Lung fibrosis ↓Loss of peripheral pulmonary blood vessels and peripheral pulmonary arterial remodeling ↑Lung function ↓Inflammation ↓PVH |
Exosome | [73] |
Human UCMSC and BM-MSC | Neonatal mouse BPD-Hyperoxia |
Improved the pulmonary phenotype ↓Pulmonary inflammation and alveolar–capillary leak ↓Loss of peripheral pulmonary blood vessels ↓Pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular hypertrophy ↓Cell death in brain and hypomyelination |
Exosome Exosome-TSG-6 |
[74] |
Rat BM-MSC | Neonatal rat BPD-Hyperoxia |
Prevented disruption of alveolar growth ↑Lung blood vessel density ↓RVH |
Exosome/exosome-VEGF | [88] |
Human UC-MSC | Neonatal Rat BPD-Hyperoxia |
↑Surface area of alveolar air spaces and the number of alveoli ↓Mean alveolar volume ↓Medial thickness index of small pulmonary vessels |
EV | [87] |
Mouse BM-MSC | Neonatal mice BPD-Hyperoxia |
↓Muscularization of intrapulmonary arterioles Improved lung alveolar architecture ↓Alveolar septal thickness ↓Number of polymorphonuclear cells and macrophages in BALF ↓TNF-α, IL-5 and ↑IL-17 in BALF |
CM CM-Opn and Csf1 |
[86] |
Mouse BM-MSC | Neonatal mice BPD-Hyperoxia |
↓Parenchymal fibrosis and peripheral PA devascularization ↓Loss of peripheral pulmonary blood vessels ↓Alveolar injury improved lung function ↓Moderate PAH and RVH ↓Peripheral PA muscularization |
CM | [84] |
Mouse BM-MSC | Neonatal mice BPD-Hyperoxia |
Ameliorated parenchymal injury ↑Number of BASCs |
CM | [85] |
Hyperoxia preconditioned rat BM-MSC | Neonatal rat BPD-Hyperoxia |
↓ PAH and RVH ↓ Pulmonary artery medial wall thickness Improved lung architecture |
CM CM-STC-1 |
[54] |
IFN-γ preconditioned human UC-MSC | Neonatal rat PVL-LPS |
↓IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1β and MCP-1 in the brain ↓MBP-positive area of white matter |
CM | [89] |
Term UC-MSCs | NPCs | ↑GFAP expression profile of NPCs ↑oligodendroglial differentiation in NPCs |
CM | [90] |
MSCs | NPCs | ↑GFAP expression profile of NPCs ↑Olig1 and Olig2 ↓Hes1 ↑Oligodendroglial differentiation in NPCs |
CM | [91] |
Rat BM-MSC and AF-MSC | Rat NEC-hypertonic feeding and LPS and hypoxia and hypothermia |
↓Incidence and severity ↑Intestinal mucosa permeability |
Exosome | [92] |
Mouse BM-MSC | Neonatal rat NEC-hypertonic feeding and hypoxia and hypothermia |
↓Incidence and severity ↑Intestinal mucosa permeability ↑Wound healing in IEC-6 cells in vitro |
Exosome | [75] |
Hypoxic preconditioned human BM-MSC | Mouse ROP-Hyperoxia |
↓Retinal ischemia and retinal neovascularization ↑Retinal thickness |
Exosome | [76] |
Abbreviations: BALF, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid; BASC, bronchioalveolar stem cell; Csf1, macrophage colony stimulating factor 1; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; Hes1, hairy enhancer of split-1; IEC-6, intestinal epithelial epithelial cells of rat small intestine; MBP, myelin basic protein; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; NPC, neural progenitor cell; Olig1, oligodendrocyte transcription factor 1; Olig2, oligodendrocyte transcription factor 2; Opn, osteopontin; PA, pulmonary arterial; PAH, pulmonary arterial hypertension; RVH, right ventricular hypertrophy.
MSC-derived secretomes for PVL therapy
PVL, also called periventricular white matter damage (PWMD), is characterized by a loss of oligodendrocytes and their progenitor cells and is the most common antecedent of cerebral palsy and the main form of brain injury in premature infants [93,940]. Importantly, PVL accounts for 5% of premature births in China [95]. PVL involves focal periventricular necrosis and diffuse gliosis in the surrounding white matter and adversely affects social, adaptive, motor, and cognitive functions in preterm children [96,97]. The factors predisposing infants to PVL mainly include birth trauma, asphyxia, hypoxia–ischemia and immature cerebrovascular development [98]. However, PVL treatment primarily includes symptomatic management and rehabilitation, which cannot effectively improve the PVL prognosis. Therefore, more researchers have focused on the effects of MSCs in PVL therapy.
Zhu et al. [99] demonstrated that hUC-MSCs administered intraperitoneally migrated mainly into the injured cerebral hemisphere in a PWMD model. Importantly, hUC-MSC treatment was found to improve the sensorimotor defects and cognitive behavioral abilities in rats. Moreover, mature oligodendrocyte counts were increased, and the amounts of activated microglia and reactive astrocytes were decreased in the hypoxia–ischemia-induced premature brain [99]; however, whether the paracrine mechanism of the transplanted hUC-MSCs was effective was undetermined. Few studies have focused on MSC secretomes and their regulatory pathway in neonatal brain injury (Table 1). Morioka et al. [89] conducted a cytokine and growth factor array and demonstrated that hUC-MSCs secreted various growth factors and cytokines. These authors found that CM extracted from IFN-γ-pretreated UC-MSCs significantly suppressed IL-1β expression in the brain and reversed brain damage in a lipopolysaccharide-induced PVL-like brain injury rat model [89]. The expressions of anti-inflammatory factors, IDO and TSG-6, in MSCs were simultaneously increased after stimulating IFN-γ and may play an important role in the MSC-derived secretomes [89]. Oppliger et al. [90] found that term UC-MSCs presented a stronger oligodendroglial differentiation effect in neural progenitor cells (NPCs) than in preterm UC-MSCs, and proteome analysis of the CM identified the laminin-α2 subunit (LAMA2) as a potential trigger for the differences. In in vitro functional study, LAMA2 knockdown in term Wharton's jelly mesenchymal stem cells (WJ-MSCs) reduced marker gene expression in NPCs co-cultured with WJ-MSCs [90]. Similarly, BM-MSC-derived CM has also been found to induce oligodendroglial differentiation in NPCs [91]. However, because of the difficulty in establishing animal models, the therapeutic benefits of MSC-derived secretomes for PVL and the underlying mechanisms are unclear and should be further investigated to explore more effective treatments.
MSC-derived secretomes for NEC
NEC is the most common neonatal gastrointestinal emergency, mainly occurring in premature newborns with birth weights less than 1500 g [100]. NEC is treated with surgery and conservative and symptomatic treatment, including fasting with total parenteral nutrition, gastrointestinal decompression and drainage, and fluid balance. Approximately 7–10% of very-low birth weight infants will develop NEC, and, among them, 27–52% will require surgical intervention [101–104]. However, the mortality rate of very-low birth weight infants with surgical NEC is approximately 50% [105]. Surviving infants with surgical NEC have poor neurodevelopmental outcomes and may develop short bowel syndrome and require long-term nutritional management because of malabsorption and growth deficiencies [106–108]. Previously published studies have described primary peritoneal drainage as an alternative treatment to open laparotomy [109]. Moss et al. [110] randomly assigned 117 preterm infants (<34 gestational weeks and birth weight < 1500 g) with NEC complicated with intestinal perforation in a multicenter controlled study; no significant differences in mortality were found between open surgery and primary peritoneal drainage. However, due to the very small sample size, clinically significant differences may have been easily ignored. There are no clear recommendations for clinicians. Other studies also have shown that drug therapy such as postnatal minimal enteral feeding with amniotic fluid, decreased the severity of NEC in pig and mouse models [111–113]. Although a number of studies have been conducted to determine novel preventive and therapeutic interventions [10], large multicenter randomized controlled trials are required for clinical application.
Evidence suggests that MSCs can improve the disease course in experimental NEC [29,114,115], and research on MSC therapy for NEC has been promising. Via histopathological and immunohistochemical evaluation, Tayman et al. [29] and Yang et al. [29] found that MSCs significantly reduced bowel damage severity and improved survival rates in an experimental rat NEC model. Rats with NEC showed significant weight gains and amelioration in their clinical sickness scores after intraperitoneal or intravenous MSC injection. Table 1 summarizes the reported studies on MSC-derived secretomes. McCulloh et al. [92] confirmed that MSC-derived exosomes are equivalent to their derived MSCs in decreasing NEC incidence and severity. Terrence et al. [92] also confirmed that BM-MSC-derived exosomes decreased the incidence and severity of experimental NEC and preserved gut barrier function after NEC exposure in vivo. Significantly improved healing rates have been shown in intestinal epithelial cells from rat small intestines (IEC-6 cells) exposed to BM-MSC-derived exosomes [75]. These are important findings, as they support a potential future therapy for this disease that uses MSC-derived exosomes. However, the detailed components of MSC-derived secretomes require identification.
MSC-derived secretomes for ROP
ROP is a potentially blinding retinal vascular disease that occurs mainly in premature infants, especially in infants of low birth weight (LBW), and is the second-leading cause of childhood blindness in the U.S.A. [116]. Along with the development of perinatal medicine, the survival rates of premature infants and those with LBW have increased, while the prevalence of ROP has increased annually. In the U.K., the incidence of ROP increased in LBW infants from 12.8% in 1990 to 12.5% in 2011 [11]. A collaborative ROP research group enrolled 6091 patients from 22 hospitals in seven administrative regions in China from 2010 to 2012 in a multicenter survey. The overall ROP incidence was found to be 15.2%; there was a 46.9% ROP incidence in babies born at a gestational age of <30 weeks and 30.6% at a birth weight of <1500 g [117]. ROP treatment primarily includes laser photocoagulation therapy, scleral cerclage, vitrectomy, and anti-VEGF treatment [118,119]. Traditional therapy has drawbacks, such as destructiveness and irreversible peripheral vision loss, and the optimal dose of anti-VEGF remains uncertain [120]. The most commonly used dose of anti-VEGF in neonates is half the adult dose, while lower doses have been demonstrated to be effective [120]. However, lower doses require special compounding, and may lead to higher rates of relapse. In addition, it is not clear whether dosing should be decreased with bilateral injections or prior laser or inflammation [120].
The therapeutic effect of MSCs in ROP has been reported in an oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) model. Wang et al. [121] and Zhao et al. [122] revealed that the area of retinal neovascularization was significantly smaller in OIR mice with intravitreally injected BM-MSCs on postnatal day 12; the injected MSCs were located in retinal neovascularized areas but did not integrate into the vascular network. Kim et al. [123] showed that human placental amniotic membrane-derived MSCs (AM-MSCs) secreted high levels of TGF-β1 and suppressed endothelial cell proliferation under pathological conditions in vitro. Moreover, TGF-β1 siRNA nullified the benefits of MSCs both in vivo and in vitro; TGF-β1 is a key secretory factor in the regulation of MSC-mediated angiogenesis [123]. Another study described the protective effects of human BM-MSC-derived exosomes against ROP [76]. In vivo experiments showed that retinal ischemia severity and the development of retinal neovascularization in the eyes of OIR models were reduced by the intravitreal injection of human BM-MSC-derived exosomes using retinal imaging techniques, fluorescein angiography, and phase-variance optical coherence tomography angiography. Although the exosomes did not completely retard retinal ischemia or neovascularization, the OIR severity was found to be significantly attenuated both qualitatively and quantitatively. Moisseiev et al. [76] also indicated that these human BM-MSC-derived exosomes encapsulated prosurvival-associated proteins from the cAMP response element-binding protein signaling pathway, which is the compensatory response of retinal ischemia. Although the current studies listed in Table 1 explored new approaches to the use of MSC-derived secretomes for the treatment of ROP, the secretome function in ROP and the underlying mechanisms should be further validated.
Conclusion and future perspectives
The health of premature infants is a complex event, and its related diseases can have continuous and unpredictable adverse effects on infant growth and development, and even on adulthood. Recent data have demonstrated that MSCs have aroused much interest due to their therapeutic effects in neonatology and premature diseases, and this type of therapeutic potential is derived from their secretomes. However, the specific mechanism is not completely understood, and may involve multiple pathways mediated by the secretion of soluble factors and exosomes/microvesicles. In the present study, the development and knowledge of MSC-derived secretomes relevant to neonatology and premature diseases were summarized. Recent reports about the complex components and beneficial effects of MSC-derived secretomes in the premature diseases were also included. Specifically, focus was placed on the therapeutic effects of MSC-derived secretomes, which arise from their capacity to deliver growth factors, immunomodulatory factors, and genetic material to target cells, thereby further promoting the activation of prosurvival and antiapoptotic pathways to enhance tissue repair and regeneration. Thus, MSC-derived secretomes have been demonstrated to display their possible advantages in future regenerative medicine as compared to cell-based therapies.
Based on MSC-derived secretomes, exosomes/microvesicles-based therapies may represent a potential and ideal drug delivery system that provides efficacy for the treatment of premature diseases that lack efficient pharmacotherapies. However, their clinical application and development remain hampered by technological, mechanistic, and safety concerns. Several issues that affect the clinical application of MSC-sourced exosomes/microvesicles must be considered. First, the isolation and characterization of MSC-derived exosomes/microvesicles must be standardized. Second, the immunogenicity of the MSC-derived exosomes/microvesicles remains debatable. Furthermore, various methods adopted to pretreat MSCs via the regulation of their functional properties, such as cytokine priming and hypoxia, present differential effects on the components and therapeutic benefits of MSC-derived secretomes. Finally, more efforts are required to better characterize the biology of MSC-released exosomes/microvesicles, and to fully explore the molecular and epigenetic mechanisms underlying their action of repair on premature diseases, including PVL, BPD, NEC, and ROP.
Abbreviations
- AF-MSC
amniotic fluid-derived MSC
- BM
bone marrow
- BPD
bronchopulmonary dysplasia
- CM
conditioned media
- Csf1
macrophage colony stimulating factor 1
- EV
extracellular vesicle
- GPX1
glutathione peroxidase1
- HO
heme oxygenase
- hUC-MSC
human umbilical cord MSC
- HUVEC
human umbilical vein endothelial cell
- IDO
indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase
- IEC-6
intestinal epithelial epithelial cells of rat small intestine
- IFN-γ
interferon-γ
- IL
interleukin
- LAMA2
laminin-α2 subunit
- LBW
low birth weight
- MSC
mesenchymal stem/stromal cell
- NEC
necrotizing enterocolitis
- NPC
neural progenitor cell
- OIR
oxygen-induced retinopathy
- PVL
periventricular leukomalacia
- PWMD
periventricular white matter damage
- ROP
retinopathy of prematurity
- RVH
right ventricular hypertrophy
- STC1
stanniocalcin-1
- TGF
transforming growth factor
- tRNA
transfer RNA
- TNF-α
tumor necrosis factor
- TSG
TNF-a-stimulated gene/protein
- VEGF
vascular endothelial growth factor
- WJ-MSC
Wharton's jelly MSC
Contributor Information
Lianghui You, Email: y_lianghui@126.com.
Yuru Fan, Email: fyr1889@njmu.edu.cn.
Competing Interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81600687], the Jiangsu Province Natural Science Foundation [grant number BK20191126], the Jiangsu Provincial Key Research and Development Program [grant number BE2019619], Six Talent Peaks Project of Jiangsu Province [grant number YY-112] and the Nanjing Medical Science and Technique Development Foundation [grant numbers QRX17160, YKK18159].
Author Contribution
W.Y. and W.L. wrote the original draft preparation. L.Y. and Y.F. constructed the main conceptual ideas and outlined the proof. J.Y.L. and Y.C. gathered and sorted the literatures. L.Y. provided the funding. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Goldenberg R.L.et al. (2008) Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet 371, 75–84 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Muglia L.J. and Katz M. (2010) The enigma of spontaneous preterm birth. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 529–535 10.1056/NEJMra0904308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Chang H.H.et al. (2013) Preventing preterm births: analysis of trends and potential reductions with interventions in 39 countries with very high human development index. Lancet 381, 223–234 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61856-X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Blencowe H.et al. (2012) National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet 379, 2162–2172 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Guo T.et al. (2018) The association between ambient temperature and the risk of preterm birth in China. Sci. Total Environ. 613–614, 439–446 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.104 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tielsch J.M. (2015) Global incidence of preterm birth. Nestle Nutr. Inst. Workshop Ser. 81, 9–15 10.1159/000365798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chawanpaiboon S.et al. (2019) Global, regional, and national estimates of levels of preterm birth in 2014: a systematic review and modelling analysis. Lancet Glob. Health 7, e37–e46 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30451-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Brink L.T.et al. (2019) The association between preterm labour, perinatal mortality and infant death (during the first year) in Bishop Lavis, Cape Town, South Africa. S. Afr. Med. J. 109, 102–106 10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i2.13438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Principi N., Di Pietro G.M. and Esposito S. (2018) Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: clinical aspects and preventive and therapeutic strategies. J. Transl. Med. 16, 36 10.1186/s12967-018-1417-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Eaton S., Rees C.M. and Hall N.J. (2017) Current research on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of necrotizing enterocolitis. Neonatology 111, 423–430 10.1159/000458462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Painter S.L.et al. (2015) Incidence and treatment of retinopathy of prematurity in England between 1990 and 2011: database study. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 99, 807–811 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2014-305561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zeng L.et al. (2018) Corticosteroids for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants: a network meta-analysis. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 103, F506–F511 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313759 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Poets C.F. and Lorenz L. (2018) Prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely low gestational age neonates: current evidence. Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed. 103, F285–F291 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314264 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bassler D. and van den Anker J. (2017) Inhaled drugs and systemic corticosteroids for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatr. Clin. North Am. 64, 1355–1367 10.1016/j.pcl.2017.08.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Lin G.C.et al. (2017) Nutritional practices and growth in premature infants after surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 65, 111–116 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinson J.R.et al. (2018) Neurodevelopmental considerations in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 27, 52–56 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Brosch-Fohraheim N.et al. (2019) The influence of preterm birth on expressive vocabulary at the age of 36 to 41 months. Medicine (Baltimore) 98, e14404 10.1097/MD.0000000000014404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.You J.et al. (2019) Late preterm infants’ social competence, motor development, and cognition. Front. Psychiatry 10, 69 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Platt M.J. (2014) Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health 128, 399–403 10.1016/j.puhe.2014.03.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Christodoulou I.et al. (2018) Mesenchymal stem cells in preclinical cancer cytotherapy: a systematic review. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 9, 336 10.1186/s13287-018-1078-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang S.et al. (2018) The dynamic roles of mesenchymal stem cells in colon cancer. Can. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2018, 7628763 10.1155/2018/7628763 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Yun C.W. and Lee S.H. (2019) Enhancement of functionality and therapeutic efficacy of cell-based therapy using mesenchymal stem cells for cardiovascular disease. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20, 982 10.3390/ijms20040982 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ward M.R., Abadeh A. and Connelly K.A. (2018) Concise review: rational use of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of ischemic heart disease. Stem. Cells Transl. Med. 7, 543–550 10.1002/sctm.17-0210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Monsel A.et al. (2015) Therapeutic effects of human mesenchymal stem cell-derived microvesicles in severe pneumonia in mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 192, 324–336 10.1164/rccm.201410-1765OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Morrison T.J.et al. (2017) Mesenchymal stromal cells modulate macrophages in clinically relevant lung injury models by extracellular vesicle mitochondrial transfer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 196, 1275–1286 10.1164/rccm.201701-0170OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.de Mendonca L.et al. (2017) Mesenchymal stromal cell therapy reduces lung inflammation and vascular remodeling and improves hemodynamics in experimental pulmonary arterial hypertension. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 8, 220 10.1186/s13287-017-0669-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Curley G.F.et al. (2012) Mesenchymal stem cells enhance recovery and repair following ventilator-induced lung injury in the rat. Thorax 67, 496–501 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2011-201059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang Z.et al. (2018) Timing of erythropoietin modified mesenchymal stromal cell transplantation for the treatment of experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 22, 5759–5763 10.1111/jcmm.13843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tayman C.et al. (2011) Mesenchymal stem cell therapy in necrotizing enterocolitis: a rat study. Pediatr. Res. 70, 489–494 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31822d7ef2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Gabrielyan A.et al. (2017) Metabolically conditioned media derived from bone marrow stromal cells or human skin fibroblasts act as effective chemoattractants for mesenchymal stem cells. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 8, 212 10.1186/s13287-017-0664-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Ionescu L.et al. (2012) Stem cell conditioned medium improves acute lung injury in mice: in vivo evidence for stem cell paracrine action. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 303, L967–L977 10.1152/ajplung.00144.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vizoso F.J.et al. (2017) Mesenchymal stem cell secretome: toward cell-free therapeutic strategies in regenerative medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1852 10.3390/ijms18091852 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Harrell C.R.et al. (2019) Molecular mechanisms responsible for therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cell-derived secretome. Cells 8, 467 10.3390/cells8050467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Pittenger M.F.et al. (1999) Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science 284, 143–147 10.1126/science.284.5411.143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Dominici M.et al. (2006) Minimal criteria for defining multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells. The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy 8, 315–317 10.1080/14653240600855905 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kern S.et al. (2006) Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, umbilical cord blood, or adipose tissue. Stem Cells 24, 1294–1301 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Da S.M.L., Chagastelles P.C. and Nardi N.B. (2006) Mesenchymal stem cells reside in virtually all post-natal organs and tissues. J. Cell Sci. 119, 2204–2213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Via A.G., Frizziero A. and Oliva F. (2012) Biological properties of mesenchymal stem cells from different sources. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J. 2, 154–162 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Lesage F. and Thebaud B. (2018) Nanotherapies for micropreemies: stem cells and the secretome in bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin. Perinatol. 42, 453–458 10.1053/j.semperi.2018.09.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Villatoro A.J.et al. (2019) Comparative analysis and characterization of soluble factors and exosomes from cultured adipose tissue and bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in canine species. Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 208, 6–15 10.1016/j.vetimm.2018.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marolt P.D.et al. (2019) Mesenchymal stromal cell-based bone regeneration therapies: from cell transplantation and tissue engineering to therapeutic secretomes and extracellular vesicles. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 7, 352 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Maumus M., Jorgensen C. and Noel D. (2013) Mesenchymal stem cells in regenerative medicine applied to rheumatic diseases: role of secretome and exosomes. Biochimie 95, 2229–2234 10.1016/j.biochi.2013.04.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.He J.G.et al. (2018) Exosomes derived from IDO1-overexpressing rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells promote immunotolerance of cardiac allografts. Cell Transplant 27, 1657–1683, 10.1177/0963689718805375 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Waszak P.et al. (2012) Preconditioning enhances the paracrine effect of mesenchymal stem cells in preventing oxygen-induced neonatal lung injury in rats. Stem Cells Dev. 21, 2789–2797 10.1089/scd.2010.0566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Salgado A.J.et al. (2010) Adipose tissue derived stem cells secretome: soluble factors and their roles in regenerative medicine. Curr. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 5, 103–110 10.2174/157488810791268564 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Meirelles L.S.et al. (2009) Mechanisms involved in the therapeutic properties of mesenchymal stem cells. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 20, 419–427 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ferreira J.R.et al. (2018) Mesenchymal stromal cell secretome: influencing therapeutic potential by cellular pre-conditioning. Front. Immunol. 9, 2837 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02837 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gabrielyan A.et al. (2017) Metabolically conditioned media derived from bone marrow stromal cells or human skin fibroblasts act as effective chemoattractants for mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 8, 212 10.1186/s13287-017-0664-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ionescu L.et al. (2012) Stem cell conditioned medium improves acute lung injury in mice: in vivo evidence for stem cell paracrine action. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 303, L967–L977 10.1152/ajplung.00144.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu B.et al. (2018) Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell conditioned medium attenuates renal fibrosis by reducing inflammation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition via the TLR4/NF-kappaB signaling pathway in vivo and in vitro. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 7 10.1186/s13287-017-0760-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tsai M.J.et al. (2014) Recovery of neurological function of ischemic stroke by application of conditioned medium of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells derived from normal and cerebral ischemia rats. J. Biomed. Sci. 21, 5 10.1186/1423-0127-21-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Yang C.et al. (2014) Conditioned media from human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells efficiently induced the apoptosis and differentiation in human glioma cell lines in vitro. Biomed Res. Int. 2014, 109389 10.1155/2014/109389 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yoshida K.et al. (2018) Serum-free medium enhances the immunosuppressive and antifibrotic abilities of mesenchymal stem cells utilized in experimental renal fibrosis. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 7, 893–905 10.1002/sctm.17-0284 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Waszak P.et al. (2012) Preconditioning enhances the paracrine effect of mesenchymal stem cells in preventing oxygen-induced neonatal lung injury in rats. Stem Cells Dev. 21, 2789–2797 10.1089/scd.2010.0566 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Jun E.K.et al. (2014) Hypoxic conditioned medium from human amniotic fluid-derived mesenchymal stem cells accelerates skin wound healing through TGF-beta/SMAD2 and PI3K/Akt pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 15, 605–628 10.3390/ijms15010605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Heo S.C.et al. (2011) Tumor necrosis factor-alpha-activated human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells accelerate cutaneous wound healing through paracrine mechanisms. J. Invest. Dermatol. 131, 1559–1567 10.1038/jid.2011.64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Lee M.J.et al. (2010) Proteomic analysis of tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced secretome of human adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. J. Proteome Res. 9, 1754–1762 10.1021/pr900898n [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Bartosh T.J.et al. (2010) Aggregation of human mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) into 3D spheroids enhances their antiinflammatory properties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 13724–13729 10.1073/pnas.1008117107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Huang Z.W.et al. (2017) Angiopoietin-1 modified human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell therapy for endotoxin-induced acute lung injury in rats. Yonsei Med. J. 58, 206–216 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.1.206 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Borger V.et al. (2017) Mesenchymal stem/stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles and their potential as novel immunomodulatory therapeutic agents. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 18, 1450 10.3390/ijms18071450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shao H.et al. (2018) New technologies for analysis of extracellular vesicles. Chem. Rev. 118, 1917–1950 10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00534 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Mushahary D.et al. (2018) Isolation, cultivation, and characterization of human mesenchymal stem cells. Cytometry A 93, 19–31 10.1002/cyto.a.23242 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Bonafede R. and Mariotti R. (2017) ALS pathogenesis and therapeutic approaches: the role of mesenchymal stem cells and extracellular vesicles. Front. Cell Neurosci. 11, 80 10.3389/fncel.2017.00080 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Aghajani N.A., Lerman L.O. and Eirin A. (2017) Mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles for kidney repair: current status and looming challenges. Stem. Cell Res. Ther. 8, 273 10.1186/s13287-017-0727-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Wang N.et al. (2017) Mesenchymal stem cells-derived extracellular vesicles, via miR-210, improve infarcted cardiac function by promotion of angiogenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis. Dis. 1863, 2085–2092 10.1016/j.bbadis.2017.02.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Ahn S.Y.et al. (2018) Vascular endothelial growth factor mediates the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles against neonatal hyperoxic lung injury. Exp. Mol. Med. 50, 26 10.1038/s12276-018-0055-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lai R.C.et al. (2016) MSC secretes at least 3 EV types each with a unique permutation of membrane lipid, protein and RNA. J. Extracell. Vesicles 5, 29828 10.3402/jev.v5.29828 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Baglio S.R.et al. (2015) Human bone marrow- and adipose-mesenchymal stem cells secrete exosomes enriched in distinctive miRNA and tRNA species. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 6, 127 10.1186/s13287-015-0116-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Mao G.et al. (2018) Exosomes derived from miR-92a-3p-overexpressing human mesenchymal stem cells enhance chondrogenesis and suppress cartilage degradation via targeting WNT5A. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 247 10.1186/s13287-018-1004-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Shi B.et al. (2018) Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal miR-21 protects C-kit+ cardiac stem cells from oxidative injury through the PTEN/PI3K/Akt axis. PLoS One 13, e0191616 10.1371/journal.pone.0191616I [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Fang S.et al. (2016) Umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomal micrornas suppress myofibroblast differentiation by inhibiting the transforming growth factor-beta/SMAD2 pathway during wound healing. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 5, 1425–1439 10.5966/sctm.2015-0367 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Yan Y.et al. (2017) hucMSC exosome-derived GPX1 is required for the recovery of hepatic oxidant injury. Mol. Ther. 25, 465–479 10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.11.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Willis G.R.et al. (2018) Mesenchymal stromal cell exosomes ameliorate experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia and restore lung function through macrophage immunomodulation. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 197, 104–116 10.1164/rccm.201705-0925OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Chaubey S.et al. (2018) Early gestational mesenchymal stem cell secretome attenuates experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia in part via exosome-associated factor TSG-6. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 9, 173 10.1186/s13287-018-0903-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Rager T.M.et al. (2016) Exosomes secreted from bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells protect the intestines from experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Pediatr. Surg. 51, 942–947 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.02.061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Moisseiev E.et al. (2017) Protective effect of intravitreal administration of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells on retinal ischemia. Curr. Eye Res. 42, 1358–1367 10.1080/02713683.2017.1319491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Zysman-Colman Z.et al. (2013) Bronchopulmonary dysplasia - trends over three decades. Paediatr. Child Health 18, 86–90 10.1093/pch/18.2.86 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Day C.L. and Ryan R.M. (2017) Bronchopulmonary dysplasia: new becomes old again! Pediatr. Res. 81, 210–213 10.1038/pr.2016.201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lapcharoensap W.et al. (2015) Hospital variation and risk factors for bronchopulmonary dysplasia in a population-based cohort. JAMA Pediatr. 169, e143676 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.3676 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Stoll B.J.et al. (2015) Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993-2012. JAMA 314, 1039–1051 10.1001/jama.2015.10244 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Jiangsu Multicenter Study Collaborative Group for Breastmilk Feeding in Neonatal Intensive Care Units (2019) Clinical characteristics and risk factors of very low birth weight and extremely low birth weight infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia: multicenter retrospective analysis. Chinese J. Pediatr. 57, 33–39, [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Chang Y.S.et al. (2014) Mesenchymal stem cells for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: phase 1 dose-escalation clinical trial. J. Pediatr. 164, 966–972.e6 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Ahn S.Y.et al. (2017) Two-year follow-up outcomes of premature infants enrolled in the phase i trial of mesenchymal stem cells transplantation for bronchopulmonary dysplasia. J. Pediatr. 185, 49–54.e2 10.1016/j.jpeds.2017.02.061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Hansmann G.et al. (2012) Mesenchymal stem cell-mediated reversal of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and associated pulmonary hypertension. Pulm. Circ. 2, 170–181 10.4103/2045-8932.97603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Tropea K.A.et al. (2012) Bronchioalveolar stem cells increase after mesenchymal stromal cell treatment in a mouse model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 302, L829–L837 10.1152/ajplung.00347.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Aslam M.et al. (2009) Bone marrow stromal cells attenuate lung injury in a murine model of neonatal chronic lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 180, 1122–1130 10.1164/rccm.200902-0242OC [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Porzionato A.et al. (2019) Intratracheal administration of clinical-grade mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles reduces lung injury in a rat model of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 316, L6–L19 10.1152/ajplung.00109.2018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Braun R.K.et al. (2018) Intraperitoneal injection of MSC-derived exosomes prevent experimental bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 503, 2653–2658 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Morioka C.et al. (2017) Neuroprotective effects of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells on periventricular leukomalacia-like brain injury in neonatal rats. Inflamm. Regen. 37, 1 10.1186/s41232-016-0032-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Oppliger B.et al. (2017) Mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord Wharton’s jelly trigger oligodendroglial differentiation in neural progenitor cells through cell-to-cell contact. Cytotherapy 19, 829–838 10.1016/j.jcyt.2017.03.075 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rivera F.J.et al. (2006) Mesenchymal stem cells instruct oligodendrogenic fate decision on adult neural stem cells. Stem Cells 24, 2209–2219 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.McCulloh C.J.et al. (2018) Treatment of experimental necrotizing enterocolitis with stem cell-derived exosomes. J. Pediatr. Surg. 53, 1215–1220 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.02.086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Folkerth R.D. (2006) Periventricular leukomalacia: overview and recent findings. Pediatr. Dev. Pathol. 9, 3–13 10.2350/06-01-0024.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Leviton A. and Paneth N. (1990) White matter damage in preterm newborns–an epidemiologic perspective. Early Hum. Dev. 24, 1–22 10.1016/0378-3782(90)90002-Z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Chen H.J.et al. (2013) Incidence of brain injuries in premature infants with gestational age = 34 weeks in ten urban hospitals in China. World J. Pediatr. 9, 17–24 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Choi J.Y., Rha D.W. and Park E.S. (2016) The effects of the severity of periventricular leukomalacia on the neuropsychological outcomes of preterm children. J. Child Neurol. 31, 603–612 10.1177/0883073815604229 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Kurahashi N.et al. (2018) Is hiragana decoding impaired in children with periventricular leukomalacia? Brain Dev. 40, 850–856 10.1016/j.braindev.2018.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Rezaie P. and Dean A. (2002) Periventricular leukomalacia, inflammation and white matter lesions within the developing nervous system. Neuropathology 22, 106–132 10.1046/j.1440-1789.2002.00438.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Zhu L.H.et al. (2014) Improvement of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on glial cell and behavioral function in a neonatal model of periventricular white matter damage. Brain Res. 1563, 13–21 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Bellodas S.J. and Kadrofske M. (2019) Necrotizing enterocolitis. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 31, e13569 10.1111/nmo.13569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Holman R.C.et al. (2006) Necrotising enterocolitis hospitalisations among neonates in the United States. Paediatr. Perinat. Epidemiol. 20, 498–506 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2006.00756.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.Ellsbury D.L.et al. (2016) A multifaceted approach to improving outcomes in the NICU: The Pediatrix 100 000 Babies Campaign. Pediatrics 137, e20150389 10.1542/peds.2015-0389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.Hull M.A.et al. (2014) Mortality and management of surgical necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight neonates: a prospective cohort study. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 218, 1148–1155 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.11.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Meinzen-Derr J.et al. (2009) Epidemiology of necrotizing enterocolitis temporal clustering in two neonatology practices. J. Pediatr. 154, 656–661 10.1016/j.jpeds.2008.11.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Blakely M.L.et al. (2006) Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation in extremely low birth weight infants: outcomes through 18 months adjusted age. Pediatrics 117, e680–e687 10.1542/peds.2005-1273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Robinson J.R.et al. (2018) Neurodevelopmental considerations in surgical necrotizing enterocolitis. Semin. Pediatr. Surg. 27, 52–56 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2017.11.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bazacliu C. and Neu J. (2019) Necrotizing enterocolitis: long term complications. Curr Pediatr Rev. 15, 15–124 10.2174/1573396315666190312093119 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Lin P.W., Nasr T.R. and Stoll B.J. (2008) Necrotizing enterocolitis: recent scientific advances in pathophysiology and prevention. Semin. Perinatol. 32, 70–82 10.1053/j.semperi.2008.01.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Rao S.C.et al. (2011) Peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy as initial surgical treatment for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis or spontaneous intestinal perforation in preterm low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2011, CD006182 10.1002/14651858.CD006182.pub2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Moss R.L.et al. (2006) Laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage for necrotizing enterocolitis and perforation. N. Engl. J. Med. 354, 2225–2234 10.1056/NEJMoa054605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Zani A.et al. (2015) International survey on the management of necrotizing enterocolitis. Eur. J. Pediatr. Surg. 25, 27–33 10.1055/s-0034-1387942 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112.Ostergaard M.V.et al. (2014) Modulation of intestinal inflammation by minimal enteral nutrition with amniotic fluid in preterm pigs. JPEN J. Parenter. Enteral Nutr. 38, 576–586 10.1177/0148607113489313 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Siggers J.et al. (2013) Postnatal amniotic fluid intake reduces gut inflammatory responses and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm neonates. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 304, G864–G875 10.1152/ajpgi.00278.2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Yang J.et al. (2012) Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor-like growth factor and mesenchymal stem cells act synergistically to prevent experimental necrotizing enterocolitis. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 215, 534–545 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.05.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115.McCulloh C.J.et al. (2017) Stem cells and necrotizing enterocolitis: a direct comparison of the efficacy of multiple types of stem cells. J. Pediatr. Surg. 52, 999–1005 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.03.028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Sommer A.et al. (2014) Challenges of ophthalmic care in the developing world. JAMA Ophthalmol. 132, 640–644 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Collaboration Group of Retinopathy of Premature Infants (2015) Multicenter survey on the clinical features and fundus lesions of retinopathy in premature infants in mainland China. Chinese J. Evid. Based Pediatr. 10, 161–165 [Google Scholar]
- 118.Stahl A. and Gopel W. (2015) Screening and treatment in retinopathy of prematurity. Dtsch. Arztebl. Int. 112, 730–735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Leng Y.et al. (2018) The treatment and risk factors of retinopathy of prematurity in neonatal intensive care units. BMC Ophthalmol. 18, 301 10.1186/s12886-018-0973-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Tran K.D., Cernichiaro-Espinosa L.A. and Berrocal A.M. (2018) Management of retinopathy of prematurity–use of anti-VEGF therapy. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. (Phila.) 7, 56–62 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Wang J.D.et al. (2017) Human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells for retinal vascular injury. Acta Ophthalmol. 95, e453–e461 10.1111/aos.13154 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Mu Q.J.et al. (2017) Effects of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell transplantation on retinal neovascularization in neonatal rats with oxygen-induced retinopathy. Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi 19, 1202–1207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Kim K.S.et al. (2016) Retinal angiogenesis effects of TGF-beta1 and paracrine factors secreted from human placental stem cells in response to a pathological environment. Cell Transplant. 25, 1145–1157 10.3727/096368915X688263 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]