Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Bioscience Reports logoLink to Bioscience Reports
. 2020 May 7;40(5):BSR20200514. doi: 10.1042/BSR20200514

Identification of co-expressed genes associated with MLL rearrangement in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Hao Zhang 1, Bei Liu 1, Juan Cheng 1, Haizhen Ma 1, Zijian Li 1, Yaming Xi 1,✉
PMCID: PMC7953500  PMID: 32347296

Abstract

Rearrangements involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene are common adverse prognostic factors of pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Even allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation does not improve the outcome of ALL cases with some types of MLL rearrangements. The aim of the present study was to identify the co-expressed genes that related to MLL rearrangement (MLL-r) and elucidate the potential mechanisms of how MLL-r and their partner genes lead to leukemogenesis. Gene co-expression networks were constructed using the gene expression data and sample traits of 204 pretreated pediatric ALL patients, and co-expression modules significantly related to the MLL-r were screened out. Gene ontology annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway analysis of the module genes were performed. Hub genes were identified and their expression levels were analyzed in samples with or without MLL-r and the results were validated by an independent investigation. Furthermore, the relationships between the hub genes and sample traits were analyzed. In total, 21 co-expression modules were identified. The green module was positively correlated with MLL-r. PROM1, LGALS1, CD44, FUT4 and HOXA10 were identified as hub genes, which were involved in focal adhesion, calcium-dependent phospholipid binding, connective tissue development and transcriptional misregulation in cancer. The expression levels of the five hub genes were significantly increased in MLL-r samples, and the results were further validated. PROM1, LGALS1, CD44 and HOXA10 were positively related to the leukocyte count. These findings might provide novel insight regarding the mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for pediatric ALL with MLL-r.

Keywords: acute lymphoblastic leukemia, MLL rearrangement, pediatric, WGCNA

Introduction

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common cancer diagnosed in children and represents approximately 25% of cancer diagnoses among children [1]. Approximately 98% of patients with pediatric ALL achieve remission, and 85% of patients aged 1–18 years with newly diagnosed ALL treated on current regimens are expected to be long-term event-free survivors, with over 90% surviving at 5 years [2,3]. Unfortunately, despite advances in treatments according to risk stratification, ALL remains the most common cause of death due to malignancy in children [4,5]. Several high-risk cytogenetic and molecular subtypes of ALL are associated with unfavorable outcomes. Rearrangements involving the mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) gene (also known as the KMT2A gene), which occur in approximately 5–10% of overall childhood ALL cases, are common adverse prognostic factors of ALL [6,7]. MLL gene rearrangement (MLL-r) is significantly associated with high risks of treatment failure, relapse and CNS involvement [8]. The 5-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) rates of these patients are worse than those of patients without MLL rearrangement (non-MLL-r). MLL-AF4 or MLL-AF9 is associated with poorer outcome (5-year EFS<60%) than other types of MLL-r [9]. Even worse, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with HLA-matched related or unrelated donors has failed to improve the outcome of ALL cases with MLL-AF4 [7,9,10]. The MLL gene codes for large nuclear protein histone lysine methyltransferase 2A (KMT2A) functions as a transcriptional regulator that catalyzes the methylation of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4). It has been confirmed that MLL participates in the regulation of hematopoietic differentiation, while MLL-r leads to hematological abnormalities, further contributing to leukemogenesis [11,12]. However, MLL fusion proteins are unable to promote leukemogenesis on their own [13]; some additional events such as high levels of MEIS1 and HOX gene expression [7,14]; and FLT3 activation [15], K-Ras mutations [16] and epigenetic abnormalities [17] are required. Not only that, these cooperative events have only been found in a portion of leukemia cases with MLL-r, indicating that these abnormities might not be essential events for the MLL-dependent leukemogenic process. Thus far, the exact mechanisms of how MLL-r causes leukemogenesis remain unclear.

Because traditional approaches, including chemotherapy and allo-HSCT, are curative for few patients with pediatric ALL and MLL-r. Several novel targeted treatment options are emerging. FLT-3 inhibitors, including lestaurtinib [18] and quizartinib [19], have been used in clinical trials of patients with leukemia and MLL-r. The results failed to demonstrate that FLT-3 inhibitors are a beneficial therapeutic approach. The proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has been used alone in five leukemia patients with MLL-r, while only three cases showed temporary hematologic responses and the other two cases showed no response. Pinometostat, which is an inhibitor of the H3K79 methyltransferase DOT1L, has shown promising efficacy in a preclinical study of MLL-r leukemia [20,21]. However, the result was disappointing when it was used in patients with pediatric ALL and MLL-r [22]. Another epigenetic agent, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, has been used in a clinical trial for the treatment of MLL-r acute leukemias in pediatric patients, but its efficacy has yet to be demonstrated. Immunotherapy, particularly chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell technology, is a promising therapeutic regimen for high-risk B-ALL. However, the application is limited due to the low/negative expression levels of targeted antigens, such as CD19 and CD22, in ALL cases with MLL-r [23–25]. In a word, only a minority of pediatric ALL patients with MLL-r may benefit from these directed strategies. Thus, it is urgently necessary to identify innovative treatment approaches to improve the unfavorable prognosis of these patients.

In the present study, a co-expression network was constructed by weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to identify co-expressed gene modules. The aim of the present study is to investigate the genes significantly related to MLL-r ALL and elucidate the mechanisms of how MLL fusions and their partner genes lead to leukemogenesis, which may provide novel therapeutic targets for ALL with MLL-r.

Materials and methods

Gene expression data and sample trait collection

The dataset GSE68735, containing microarray data and clinical phenotype information from 207 pretreated patients with pediatric ALL, was downloaded from the GEO database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/). The gene expression data were generated by an Affymetrix Human Genome U133 Plus 2.0 Array. The sample traits, including the age, sex, leukocyte count, MLL-r, TEL-AML, E2A-PBX1, combined trisomy 4 and 10 and central nervous system (CNS) statuses, of 207 ALL cases were extracted.

Co-expression network construction and module identification

Scale-free gene co-expression networks were constructed using the WGCNA package in R [26]. Outlier samples were identified and removed before co-expression analysis. A similarity matrix of all pairwise genes was constructed based on Pearson’s correlation analysis. The soft-thresholding power β was used when the scale-free topology fit index was approximately 0.90, which caused the matrix to achieve a scale-free network. The similarity matrix was converted into an adjacency matrix, and the adjacency matrix was then transformed into a topological overlap matrix (TOM). The dynamic tree cut method was used to identify co-expressed gene modules with a minimum gene group size of 30. The module eigengene (ME) was used to represent the expression profiles of the module genes [27]. Similar modules with correlations > 0.75 were merged.

Module–trait relationship analysis

Relationships between the modules and sample traits were identified by calculating the correlation coefficient. In the present study, the MLL-r status was selected as a target sample trait. Co-expression modules significantly related to the MLL-r status were screened out for the subsequent analysis. The correlation between a specific gene and the eigengene of a module (module membership, MM) and the correlation between a specific gene and sample traits (gene significance, GS) were calculated in the candidate modules.

Gene functional annotation and pathway enrichment analysis

Gene ontology (GO) functional annotation and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of the module genes mentioned above were performed with the clusterProfiler package in R [28] with an adjusted threshold of P < 0.05.

Hub gene identification and validation

Genes with high connectivity in the network were identified by their kME (eigengene connectivity) values. Genes with |kME| ≥ 0.8 were identified as candidate hub genes. A protein–protein interaction (PPI) network of the module genes was constructed using the STRING online database (version 10.5, http://www.string-db.org/) [29], with a minimum required interaction score > 0.4 (median confidence). Hub genes were screened out by the CytoHubba plug-in (version 2.1.6, http://apps.cytoscape.org/apps/cytohubba) in Cytoscape [30]. The same hub genes identified by the two methods were selected and defined as hub genes. The hub gene mRNA expression in samples with or without MLL-r was analyzed, and the results were validated by the Coustan-Smith leukemia study [31] in the Oncomine database (https://www.oncomine.org/).

The relationship between hub genes and sample traits

To reveal the relationship between the hub genes and sample traits, correlation analysis was performed using Spearman’s correlation method.

Results

Gene expression data and sample traits

The dataset GSE68735 contained expression values for 207 patients diagnosed with pediatric ALL. Three cases, which included GSM1679955, GSM1680005 and GSM1680015, were excluded because the TEL-AML and trisomy 4 and 10 statuses were unknown. A total of 204 cases with a median age of 13 years were selected for further analysis. MLL-r was identified in approximately 10% of the patients. Three of the 207 cases had TEL-AML, 23 cases had E2A-PBX1, and 5 cases had combined trisomy 4 and 10. The clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients according to the MLL rearrangement status are shown in Table 1.

Table 1. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of patients according to MLL rearrangement status.

Characteristics MLL-r (n = 21) non-MLL-r (n = 183) P-value
Age (days) 1704.0 (681.0–4950.5) 4918.0 (1914.0–5867.0) 0.005*
Gender (n)
  Male 11 123 0.175#
  Female 10 60
Leukocyte count (×109/l) 125.8 (44.3–241.7) 45.1 (12.7–137.8) 0.011*
CNSL (n)
  No 20 163 0.378#
  Yes 1 20
Open in a new tab
*

The difference of age and Leukocyte count between MLL-r and non-MLL-r group was compared by Mann–Whitney U test.

#

The difference of gender and CNSL between MLL-r and non-MLL-r group was compared by chi-square test. CNSL: central nervous system leukemia; MLL-r: mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement; Non-MLL-r: without mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement.

Co-expression network construction and module identification

Two outlier samples were removed based on the sample clustering result. The top 25% (13669) of the most variant genes were selected to construct the co-expression network. The scale-free topology fit index reached 0.85 when β was set to 7 (Figure 1). As a result, 21 different co-expression modules clustered from 37 to 3654 genes were identified (Figure 2).

Figure 1. Determination of soft-thresholding power β.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(A) The scale-free topology fit index for various value of β. (B) The mean connectivity for various value of β. (C) Checking the scale-free network when β = 7.

Figure 2. Gene clustering dendrogram based on dissimilarity measure.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Co-expression modules were identified by the dynamic tree cut method and similar modules were merged when the correlation higher than 0.75. Each co-expression module was assigned a distinctive color, and each vertical line represents a gene.

Module–trait relationship analysis

The green module was positively related to the MLL-r status (r = 0.8, P = 5e-47) and leukocyte count (r = 0.31, P = 7e-06) (Figure 3). Moreover, the GS for the MLL-r status and the MM of genes in the green module were calculated, and a scatter plot of the correlation was generated. The result showed that there was a significantly positive correlation between the GS for the MLL-r status and the MM of genes in the green module (Figure 4).

Figure 3. Correlation between co-expression modules and sample traits.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Each row represents a module eigengene and each column represents a sample trait. Each cell contains a correlation (the first line) and P-value (the second line). The cells are color-coded by correlation according to the color legend. CNSL: central nervous system leukemia; MLL: mixed lineage leukemia.

Figure 4. Scatter plot of GS for MLL gene rearrangement status versus MM in green module.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

GS: gene significance; MLL: mixed lineage leukemia; MM: module membership.

GO annotation and pathway enrichment analysis of the genes in the green module

All 213 genes in the green module were analyzed by the clusterProfiler package in R for GO annotation and KEGG analysis. The results revealed that most significant terms for cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF) and biological processes (BPs) were focal adhesion (GO:0005925), calcium-dependent phospholipid binding (GO:0005544) and connective tissue development (GO:0061448), respectively (Figure 5A–C). The KEGG analysis indicated that 11 genes in the green module were significantly enriched in transcriptional misregulation in cancer (hsa05202) (Figure 5D).

Figure 5. GO functional annotation and KEGG pathway enrichment of genes in green module.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Each orange circle represents a term and gray circle represents a gene. (A) GO-CC terms. (B) GO-MF terms. (C) GO-BP terms. (D) KEGG pathway. BP: biological processes; CC: cellular component; KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes; MF: molecular function.

Hub gene identification and validation

PROM1 (ENSG00000007062; chr4:15,963,076-16,084,378), LGALS1 (ENSG00000100097; chr22:37,675,636-37,679,802), CD44 (ENSG00000026508; chr11:35,138,870-35,232,402), FUT4 (ENSG00000196371; chr11:94,543,840-94,549,898) and HOXA10 (ENSG00000253293; chr7:27,170,592-27,180,261) with kME values > 0.8 were simultaneously identified as hub genes by the CytoHubba plug-in in Cytoscape. The expression levels of all five hub genes were significantly increased in the samples with MLL-r compared with the samples without MLL-r (Figure 6). Only one study that compared the expression levels of the five hub genes in patients with pediatric ALL with or without MLL-r was identified in the Oncomine database. Similarly, all five hub genes showed significantly higher expression levels in patients with pediatric ALL and MLL-r (Figure 7).

Figure 6. Analysis of the mRNA expression value of five hub genes in pediatric ALL patients with or without MLL rearrangement.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

P values are the results according to Mann–Whitney U test. MLL-r: mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement; non-MLL-r: without mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement.

Figure 7. Validation of the hub genes’ expression level in the Oncomine database.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

P values are the results according to Mann–Whitney U test. MLL-r: mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement; non-MLL-r: without mixed lineage leukemia gene rearrangement

The relationship between hub genes and sample traits

As mentioned above, the green module was positively correlated with the MLL-r status and leukocyte count. The results of the correlation analysis revealed that PROM1, LGALS1, CD44 and HOXA10 were positively correlated with the leukocyte count with P-values less than 0.05 (Figure 8).

Figure 8. Heatmap of relationship between hub genes and sample traits.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Circles in the cells upper right represent correlation of hub genes and sample traits; red represents positive correlation; blue represents negative correlation; the gradual color change from blue to red represents the correlation coefficients change from low to high; the size of circles represents size of correlation coefficients. Numbers in the cells lower left represent the correlation P-values. Insignificant correlations with P-value lower than 0.05 are leaved blank. The correlation coefficients were calculated using Spearman’s correlation method; CNSL: central nervous system leukemia; MLL: mixed lineage leukemia.

Discussion

MLL-r remains a major unfavorable prognostic factor in ALL. The EFS and OS of pediatric ALL with MLL-r are inferior to those of patients without MLL-r due to chemotherapeutic refractoriness and relapse. It remains challenging to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of MLL-r leukemia and identify new therapeutic targets. Therefore, WGCNA was carried out to identify co-expressed genes associated with MLL-r in pediatric ALL. The green module was screened for further analysis because it had the highest correlation coefficient with the MLL-r status of pediatric ALL. To understand the biological functions of the co-expressed gene module, GO annotation and pathway enrichment analysis were performed. The results showed that the most significant GO-CC term enriched by the co-expressed genes was focal adhesion, which is a crucial step in cell migration [32]. The calcium-dependent phospholipid binding (MF term) and connective tissue development (BP term) were mainly involved in the green module genes. The most significantly enriched KEGG pathway in the green module was transcriptional misregulation in cancer, which is involved in ALL with MLL-r.

To distinguish important genes in the green module, a PPI network of the module genes was constructed. Then, hub genes, which included PROM1, LGALS1, CD44, FUT4 and HOXA10, were identified by CytoHubba based on the PPI network, and all hub genes had kME values ≥ 0.8. The expression levels of all five hub genes were significantly increased in the samples with MLL-r compared with the samples without MLL-r, and the results were validated by an independent investigation in the Oncomine database. Furthermore, the results of the correlation analysis revealed that PROM1, LGALS1, CD44 and HOXA10 were positively correlated with the leukocyte count, which is an adverse prognostic factor of pediatric ALL. The HOXA10 gene, which is a member of the homeobox gene family, is typically expressed in decidualizing stromal cells and hematopoietic stem cells. It codes a transcription factor that participates in hematopoietic cell differentiation and normal implantation [33–35]. The abnormal expression of homeoboxgenes, which contributed to oncogenesis and progression of cancers, were found in breast, colon and ovarian cancers [36]. HOXA10, HOXA9 and HOXC6 were consistently up-regulated in cell lines and primary cells from ALL patients with MLL-r [14,37]. Importantly, HOX genes, including HOXA10, HOXA9 and HOXC6, are significantly up-regulated in both T- and B-lineage ALLs with MLL translocations. Conversely, homeobox genes knockdown decreased the proliferation of leukemia cells of acute leukemia with MLL-r [38]. These results strongly indicated that these genes are involved in MLL-r ALL as central factors. The possible mechanism could be that the dysregulation of HOX genes directly caused by MLL fusion proteins promotes the excessive self-renewal of hematopoietic cells, which is associated with the origin and maintenance of leukemogenic events [39].

CD44, which encodes a cell adhesion glycoprotein, is crucial to various physiological processes, such as cell migration, limb development, extracellular binding, lymphocyte homing and hematopoiesis. Additionally, CD44 plays crucial roles in pathological processes, particularly in tumor progression, metastasis and chemoresistance, suggesting that it is a potential marker of stem cells in solid tumors and leukemia-initiating cells. At present, CD44 was identified as a stemness-related gene of several cancers including glioblastoma, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, colorectal cancer and acute myeloid leukemia [40]. Significantly higher expression levels were observed in patients with ALL compared with umbilical cord blood precursor cells [41] and contributed to chemoresistance by increasing drug efflux [42]. Interestingly, the gene expression level of CD44 in ALL cases with MLL-r was much greater than that in ALL cases without MLL-r [43,44], which was consistent with the results of our study. These findings demonstrated that MLL-r may participate in the maturation arrest of early lymphoid progenitors because CD44 expression is involved in early steps of lymphoid development [45]. Previous studies have shown that anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies inhibit the proliferation and reverse the differentiation arrest of acute myeloid leukemia cell lines and primary acute myeloid leukemia cells by increasing the expression level and stability of the p27 protein [46–48]. Moreover, anti-CD44 monoclonal antibodies have also shown the promising potential of eradicating acute myeloid leukemia stem cells by inhibiting acute myeloid leukemia stem cell homing [49]. Whether CD44-targeted therapy is an effective strategy for the treatment of ALL with MLL-r and acute myeloid leukemia requires further investigation. The PROM1 gene encodes the surface antigen CD133, which acts as a marker of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells [50]. In addition, CD133 was used for identifying many types of cancer stem cells (CSCs) [40]. And CD133+ cells were characterized by self-renewal, proliferation, invasion and multi-drug resistance, the mechanism was associated with activation of the CSCs-related signaling such as PI3K/Akt, epidermal growth factor receptor and src-focal adhesion kinase [51]. Overexpression of the PROM1 gene has been identified in ALL with MLL-AF4 [37]. PROM1 transcription, which is required for the growth of ALL cells and is regulated by AF4, is downregulated due to the knockdown of AF4 [52]. However, few studies have focused on the expression level and effect of PROM1 in ALL with other MLL translocations. Recently, a bispecific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) targeting CD19 and CD133 was designed, and tandem CAR (TanCAR) T cells were then applied to cell lines and a mouse model with MLL-AF4 B-cell ALL, which is frequently accompanied by the loss of CD19 expression. The results showed that TanCAR T cells selectively kill CD19+CD133+ and CD19-CD133+ leukemia cells with slight cytotoxicity against normal hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells [53]. But other investigators have highlighted concerns regarding CAR targeting CD133 as a suitable approach for treating MLL-r leukemia because their data indicated that the expression level of PROM1/CD133 in early normal hematopoietic stem cells is equal to or greater than that in B-cell ALL with MLL-AF4 or MLL-AF9 [54]. Thus, the potential of PROM1/CD133 as a target for immunotherapy requires further confirmation. The LGALS1 gene encodes galectin-1 (Gal-1), which is acarbohydrate-binding protein with the ability to bind β-D-galactopyranoside glycans and is involved in glycosylation [55,56]. The ligation of galectin and glycan contributes to cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and tumor immunity [56]. However, the dysregulation of glycosylation and galectin expression have been shown to be significant events in oncogenesis, metastasis and resistance to chemotherapy [55,57,58]. The gene and protein expression levels of LGALS1 have been shown to be significantly higher in MLL-r B-ALL due to MLL-dependent epigenetic modifications [59]. Several inhibitors designed to target galectin-1 have shown therapeutic potential in different tumors and inflammatory disorders [60]. PTX008, which is an inhibitor of Gal-1, have been shown to reduce the proliferation and migration of B-cell precursor cells in ALL [61]. However, the challenge is that cancer cells produce different galectin isoforms by alternative splicing, which may result in resistance to galectin inhibitors [62]. Coincidentally, the fucosyltransferase-4 (FUT4) gene encode sanα-1,3-fucosyl transferase named Fut-IV and participates in fucosylation, which is an important type of glycosylation. Aberrant fucosylation has been shown in a number of pathological events, including the proliferation, invasion and metastasis of cancer cells and chemoresistance [63,64]. FucT-IV is distributed in leukocytes and myeloid cells and contributes to the final step of Lewis (Le) antigen biosynthesis [65]. The high expression levels of FucTs accompanied by the overexpression of certain glycan structures have been identified in several cancers. Similarly, increased expression levels of Lex have been observed in various solid tumors [66]. To date, few studies have examined the relationship between the FUT4 gene and leukemia, and most of these studies focused on myeloid leukemia cell lines [67,68]. Recently, a study revealed that FUT4 is overexpressed in patients with ALL [69]. However, the relationship between the FUT4 gene and MLL-r status remains unknown and requires further exploration.

In conclusion, a scale-free co-expression network was constructed by WGCNA. The green module was identified as a meaningful module that is significantly related to MLL-r, and PROM1, LGALS1, CD44, FUT4 and HOXA10 in this module were identified as hub genes with higher mRNA expression levels in MLL-r cases than in non-MLL-r cases. Additionally, the results were validated in other independent database. Interestingly, among these hub genes, HOXA10, CD44 and PROM1 were all recognized as important markers of hematopoietic stem cells and progenitor cells. Both LGALS1 and FUT4 are involved in the dysregulation of glycosylation. Their overexpression may play dominant roles in the leukemogenesis, development, chemoresistance and relapse of MLL-r ALL by promoting the characteristic self-renewal of leukemia stem cells. Overall, these findings might provide novel insights regarding the mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for patients with pediatric ALL and MLL-r.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the Oncomine and the Gene Expression Omnibus for providing all data in this research.

Abbreviations

ALL

acute lymphoblastic leukemia

allo-HSCT

allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

CAR

chimeric antigen receptor

CSC

cancer stem cell

EFS

event-free survival

FUT4

fucosyltransferase-4

GO

gene ontology

H3K4

histone H3 lysine 4

HDAC

histone deacetylase

KEGG

Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes

KMT2A

histone lysine methyltransferase 2A

MLL

mixed lineage leukemia

MLL-r

MLL rearrangement

OS

overall survival

PPI

protein–protein interaction

WGCNA

weighted gene co-expression network analysis

Competing Interests

The authors declare that there are no competing interests associated with the manuscript.

Funding

The authors declare that there are no sources of funding to be acknowledged.

Author Contribution

H.Z. and Y.X. designed the study. H.Z., B.L., J.C., H.M. and Z.L. analyzed the data. H.Z. wrote the manuscript. Y.X. revised the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Pui C.H. and Evans W.E. (2013) A 50-year journey to cure childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Semin. Hematol. 50, 185–196 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2013.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moricke A., Zimmermann M., Valsecchi M.G., Stanulla M., Biondi A., Mann G.et al. (2016) Dexamethasone vs prednisone in induction treatment of pediatric ALL: results of the randomized trial AIEOP-BFM ALL 2000. Blood 127, 2101–2112 10.1182/blood-2015-09-670729 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pieters R., de Groot-Kruseman H., Van der Velden V., Fiocco M., van den Berg H., de Bont E.et al. (2016) Successful Therapy Reduction and Intensification for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Based on Minimal Residual Disease Monitoring: Study ALL10 From the Dutch Childhood Oncology Group. J. Clin. Oncol. 34, 2591–2601 10.1200/JCO.2015.64.6364 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chessells J.M., Veys P., Kempski H., Henley P., Leiper A., Webb D.et al. (2003) Long-term follow-up of relapsed childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 123, 396–405 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04584.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Gaynon P.S. and Sun W. (2016) Oligoclonality and new agent evaluation in acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br. J. Haematol. 173, 950–957 10.1111/bjh.14143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Behm F.G., Raimondi S.C., Frestedt J.L., Liu Q., Crist W.M., Downing J.R.et al. (1996) Rearrangement of the MLL gene confers a poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia, regardless of presenting age. Blood 87, 2870–2877 10.1182/blood.V87.7.2870.bloodjournal8772870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Winters A.C. and Bernt K.M. (2017) MLL-Rearranged Leukemias-An Update on Science and Clinical Approaches. Front. Pediatr. 5, 4 10.3389/fped.2017.00004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pui C.H. (2000) Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. Curr. Opin. Oncol. 12, 3–12 10.1097/00001622-200001000-00002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pui C.H., Gaynon P.S., Boyett J.M., Chessells J.M., Baruchel A., Kamps W.et al. (2002) Outcome of treatment in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with rearrangements of the 11q23 chromosomal region. Lancet 359, 1909–1915 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08782-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Pui C.H., Chessells J.M., Camitta B., Baruchel A., Biondi A., Boyett J.M.et al. (2003) Clinical heterogeneity in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with 11q23 rearrangements. Leukemia 17, 700–706 10.1038/sj.leu.2402883 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guenther M.G., Jenner R.G., Chevalier B., Nakamura T., Croce C.M., Canaani E.et al. (2005) Global and Hox-specific roles for the MLL1 methyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 8603–8608 10.1073/pnas.0503072102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yagi H., Deguchi K., Aono A., Tani Y., Kishimoto T. and Komori T. (1998) Growth disturbance in fetal liver hematopoiesis of Mll-mutant mice. Blood 92, 108–117 10.1182/blood.V92.1.108.413k11_108_117 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Stam R.W. (2013) The ongoing conundrum of MLL-AF4 driven leukemogenesis. Blood 121, 3780–3781 10.1182/blood-2013-03-491738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Armstrong S.A., Golub T.R. and Korsmeyer S.J. (2003) MLL-rearranged leukemias: insights from gene expression profiling. Semin. Hematol. 40, 268–273 10.1016/S0037-1963(03)00196-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bueno C., Ayllon V., Montes R., Navarro-Montero O., Ramos-Mejia V., Real P.J.et al. (2013) FLT3 activation cooperates with MLL-AF4 fusion protein to abrogate the hematopoietic specification of human ESCs. Blood 121, 3867–3878, S3861-S3863 10.1182/blood-2012-11-470146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tamai H., Miyake K., Takatori M., Miyake N., Yamaguchi H., Dan K.et al. (2011) Activated K-Ras protein accelerates human MLL/AF4-induced leukemo-lymphomogenicity in a transgenic mouse model. Leukemia 25, 888–891 10.1038/leu.2011.15 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Guest E.M. and Stam R.W. (2017) Updates in the biology and therapy for infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 29, 20–26 10.1097/MOP.0000000000000437 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Brown P., Levis M., Shurtleff S., Campana D., Downing J. and Small D. (2005) FLT3 inhibition selectively kills childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia cells with high levels of FLT3 expression. Blood 105, 812–820 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cooper T.M., Cassar J., Eckroth E., Malvar J., Sposto R., Gaynon P.et al. (2016) A Phase I Study of Quizartinib Combined with Chemotherapy in Relapsed Childhood Leukemia: A Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia & Lymphoma (TACL) Study. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 4014–4022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Daigle S.R., Olhava E.J., Therkelsen C.A., Basavapathruni A., Jin L., Boriack-Sjodin P.A.et al. (2013) Potent inhibition of DOT1L as treatment of MLL-fusion leukemia. Blood 122, 1017–1025 10.1182/blood-2013-04-497644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Daigle S.R., Olhava E.J., Therkelsen C.A., Majer C.R., Sneeringer C.J., Song J.et al. (2011) Selective killing of mixed lineage leukemia cells by a potent small-molecule DOT1L inhibitor. Cancer Cell 20, 53–65 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Shukla N., O'Brien M.M., Silverman L.B., Pauly M., Wetmore C., Loh M.L.et al. (2015) Preliminary Report of the Phase 1 Study of the DOT1L Inhibitor, Pinometostat, EPZ-5676, in Children with Relapsed or Refractory MLL-r Acute Leukemia: Safety, Exposure and Target Inhibition. Blood 126, 3792–3792 10.1182/blood.V126.23.3792.3792 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Aoki Y., Watanabe T., Saito Y., Kuroki Y., Hijikata A., Takagi M.et al. (2015) Identification of CD34+ and CD34- leukemia-initiating cells in MLL-rearranged human acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 125, 967–980 10.1182/blood-2014-03-563304 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gardner R., Wu D., Cherian S., Fang M., Hanafi L.A., Finney O.et al. (2016) Acquisition of a CD19-negative myeloid phenotype allows immune escape of MLL-rearranged B-ALL from CD19 CAR-T-cell therapy. Blood 127, 2406–2410 10.1182/blood-2015-08-665547 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Shah N.N., Stevenson M.S., Yuan C.M., Richards K., Delbrook C., Kreitman R.J.et al. (2015) Characterization of CD22 expression in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Pediatr. Blood Cancer 62, 964–969 10.1002/pbc.25410 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Langfelder P. and Horvath S. (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 10.1186/1471-2105-9-559 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Langfelder P. and Horvath S. (2007) Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between co-expression modules. BMC Syst. Biol. 1, 54 10.1186/1752-0509-1-54 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yu G., Wang L.G., Han Y. and He Q.Y. (2012) clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 10.1089/omi.2011.0118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Szklarczyk D., Gable A.L., Lyon D., Junge A., Wyder S., Huerta-Cepas J.et al. (2019) STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D607–D613 10.1093/nar/gky1131 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Chin C.H., Chen S.H., Wu H.H., Ho C.W., Ko M.T. and Lin C.Y. (2014) cytoHubba: identifying hub objects and sub-networks from complex interactome. BMC Syst. Biol. 8, S11 10.1186/1752-0509-8-S4-S11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Coustan-Smith E., Song G., Clark C., Key L., Liu P., Mehrpooya M.et al. (2011) New markers for minimal residual disease detection in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Blood 117, 6267–6276 10.1182/blood-2010-12-324004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Balaban N.Q., Schwarz U.S., Riveline D., Goichberg P., Tzur G., Sabanay I.et al. (2001) Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat. Cell Biol. 3, 466–472 10.1038/35074532 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Das S.K. (2010) Regional development of uterine decidualization: molecular signaling by Hoxa-10. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 77, 387–396 10.1002/mrd.21133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rahman M.A., Li M., Li P., Wang H., Dey S.K. and Das S.K. (2006) Hoxa-10 deficiency alters region-specific gene expression and perturbs differentiation of natural killer cells during decidualization. Dev. Biol. 290, 105–117 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sauvageau G., Lansdorp P.M., Eaves C.J., Hogge D.E., Dragowska W.H., Reid D.S.et al. (1994) Differential expression of homeobox genes in functionally distinct CD34+ subpopulations of human bone marrow cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 91, 12223–12227 10.1073/pnas.91.25.12223 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bhatlekar S., Fields J.Z. and Boman B.M. (2014) HOX genes and their role in the development of human cancers. J. Mol. Med. (Berl.) 92, 811–823 10.1007/s00109-014-1181-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Guenther M.G., Lawton L.N., Rozovskaia T., Frampton G.M., Levine S.S., Volkert T.L.et al. (2008) Aberrant chromatin at genes encoding stem cell regulators in human mixed-lineage leukemia. Genes Dev. 22, 3403–3408 10.1101/gad.1741408 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Orlovsky K., Kalinkovich A., Rozovskaia T., Shezen E., Itkin T., Alder H.et al. (2011) Down-regulation of homeobox genes MEIS1 and HOXA in MLL-rearranged acute leukemia impairs engraftment and reduces proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 7956–7961 10.1073/pnas.1103154108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ferrando A.A., Armstrong S.A., Neuberg D.S., Sallan S.E., Silverman L.B., Korsmeyer S.J.et al. (2003) Gene expression signatures in MLL-rearranged T-lineage and B-precursor acute leukemias: dominance of HOX dysregulation. Blood 102, 262–268 10.1182/blood-2002-10-3221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Najafi M., Farhood B. and Mortezaee K. (2019) Cancer stem cells (CSCs) in cancer progression and therapy. J. Cell. Physiol. 234, 8381–8395 10.1002/jcp.27740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Marques L. V.C., Noronha E.P., Andrade F.G., Dos Santos-Bueno F.V., Mansur M.B., Terra-Granado E.et al. (2018) CD44 Expression Profile Varies According to Maturational Subtypes and Molecular Profiles of Pediatric T-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. Front. Oncol. 8, 488 10.3389/fonc.2018.00488 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hoofd C., Wang X., Lam S., Jenkins C., Wood B., Giambra V.et al. (2016) CD44 promotes chemoresistance in T-ALL by increased drug efflux. Exp. Hematol. 44, 166e117–171e117 10.1016/j.exphem.2015.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Armstrong S.A., Staunton J.E., Silverman L.B., Pieters R., den Boer M.L., Minden M.D.et al. (2002) MLL translocations specify a distinct gene expression profile that distinguishes a unique leukemia. Nat. Genet. 30, 41–47 10.1038/ng765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tsutsumi S., Taketani T., Nishimura K., Ge X., Taki T., Sugita K.et al. (2003) Two distinct gene expression signatures in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with MLL rearrangements. Cancer Res. 63, 4882–4887 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hardy R.R. and Hayakawa K. (2001) B cell development pathways. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19, 595–621 10.1146/annurev.immunol.19.1.595 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Charrad R.S., Li Y., Delpech B., Balitrand N., Clay D., Jasmin C.et al. (1999) Ligation of the CD44 adhesion molecule reverses blockage of differentiation in human acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 5, 669–676 10.1038/9518 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Gadhoum Z., Leibovitch M.P., Qi J., Dumenil D., Durand L., Leibovitch S.et al. (2004) CD44: a new means to inhibit acute myeloid leukemia cell proliferation via p27Kip1. Blood 103, 1059–1068 10.1182/blood-2003-04-1218 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Morath I., Hartmann T.N. and Orian-Rousseau V. (2016) CD44: More than a mere stem cell marker. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 81, 166–173 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jin L., Hope K.J., Zhai Q., Smadja-Joffe F. and Dick J.E. (2006) Targeting of CD44 eradicates human acute myeloid leukemic stem cells. Nat. Med. 12, 1167–1174 10.1038/nm1483 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Toren A., Bielorai B., Jacob-Hirsch J., Fisher T., Kreiser D., Moran O.et al. (2005) CD133-positive hematopoietic stem cell “stemness” genes contain many genes mutated or abnormally expressed in leukemia. Stem Cells 23, 1142–1153 10.1634/stemcells.2004-0317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Jang J.W., Song Y., Kim S.H., Kim J. and Seo H.R. (2017) Potential mechanisms of CD133 in cancer stem cells. Life Sci. 184, 25–29 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mak A.B., Nixon A.M. and Moffat J. (2012) The mixed lineage leukemia (MLL) fusion-associated gene AF4 promotes CD133 transcription. Cancer Res. 72, 1929–1934 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3589 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li D., Hu Y., Jin Z., Zhai Y., Tan Y., Sun Y.et al. (2018) TanCAR T cells targeting CD19 and CD133 efficiently eliminate MLL leukemic cells. Leukemia 32, 2012–2016 10.1038/s41375-018-0212-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bueno C., Velasco-Hernandez T., Gutierrez-Aguera F., Zanetti S.R., Baroni M.L., Sanchez-Martinez D.et al. (2019) CD133-directed CAR T-cells for MLL leukemia: on-target, off-tumor myeloablative toxicity. Leukemia 33, 2090–2125 10.1038/s41375-019-0418-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Laaf D., Bojarova P., Elling L. and Kren V. (2019) Galectin-Carbohydrate Interactions in Biomedicine and Biotechnology. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 402–415 10.1016/j.tibtech.2018.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wdowiak K., Francuz T., Gallego-Colon E., Ruiz-Agamez N., Kubeczko M., Grochola I.et al. (2018) Galectin Targeted Therapy in Oncology: Current Knowledge and Perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 19, 210 10.3390/ijms19010210 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Christiansen M.N., Chik J., Lee L., Anugraham M., Abrahams J.L. and Packer N.H. (2014) Cell surface protein glycosylation in cancer. Proteomics 14, 525–546 10.1002/pmic.201300387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Greville G., McCann A., Rudd P.M. and Saldova R. (2016) Epigenetic regulation of glycosylation and the impact on chemo-resistance in breast and ovarian cancer. Epigenetics 11, 845–857 10.1080/15592294.2016.1241932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Juszczynski P., Rodig S.J., Ouyang J., O'Donnell E., Takeyama K., Mlynarski W.et al. (2010) MLL-rearranged B lymphoblastic leukemias selectively express the immunoregulatory carbohydrate-binding protein galectin-1. Clin. Cancer Res. 16, 2122–2130 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-2765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Blanchard H., Bum-Erdene K., Bohari M.H. and Yu X. (2016) Galectin-1 inhibitors and their potential therapeutic applications: a patent review. Exp. Opin. Ther. Pat. 26, 537–554 10.1517/13543776.2016.1163338 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Paz H., Joo E.J., Chou C.H., Fei F., Mayo K.H., Abdel-Azim H.et al. (2018) Treatment of B-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the Galectin-1 inhibitor PTX008. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 37, 67 10.1186/s13046-018-0721-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Thijssen V.L., Heusschen R., Caers J. and Griffioen A.W. (2015) Galectin expression in cancer diagnosis and prognosis: A systematic review. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1855, 235–247 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Miyoshi E., Moriwaki K. and Nakagawa T. (2008) Biological function of fucosylation in cancer biology. J. Biochem. 143, 725–729 10.1093/jb/mvn011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Shan M., Yang D., Dou H. and Zhang L. (2019) Fucosylation in cancer biology and its clinical applications. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 162, 93–119 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2019.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tu Z., Lin Y.N. and Lin C.H. (2013) Development of fucosyltransferase and fucosidase inhibitors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42, 4459–4475 10.1039/c3cs60056d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Dube D.H. and Bertozzi C.R. (2005) Glycans in cancer and inflammation–potential for therapeutics and diagnostics. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 4, 477–488 10.1038/nrd1751 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Robinson N.E., de Vries T., Davis R.E., Stults C.L., Watson S.R., van den Eijnden D.H.et al. (1994) Expression of fucosylated antigens and alpha 1,3 fucosyltransferases in human leukaemia cell lines. Glycobiology 4, 317–326 10.1093/glycob/4.3.317 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Taniguchi A., Suga R. and Matsumoto K. (2000) Expression and transcriptional regulation of the human alpha1, 3-fucosyltransferase 4 (FUT4) gene in myeloid and colon adenocarcinoma cell lines. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 273, 370–376 10.1006/bbrc.2000.2929 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Yi L., Hu Q., Zhou J., Liu Z. and Li H. (2019) Alternative splicing of Ikaros regulates the FUT4/Le(X)-alpha5beta1 integrin-FAK axis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 510, 128–134 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Bioscience Reports are provided here courtesy of Portland Press Ltd

RESOURCES