Abstract
Background
Coronary vasospasm can present like an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) with an intense vasoconstriction resulting in total or near-total occlusion of one or more of the coronary vessels. Definitive diagnosis can be made by intracoronary provocation testing.
Case summary
A 37-year-old Caucasian male and smoker was admitted with chest pain. Highly sensitive troponin-I was positive at 63 ng/L (99th percentile upper reference limit, <15 ng/L) with a repeat value of 45 ng/L three and a half hours later which was of clinical significance. Serial electrocardiography (ECG) showed no ischaemic changes. Coronary angiography revealed several distal and side branch stenoses; however, angiographic appearances were atypical of coronary plaque. A differential diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection was suspected although the patient was pain free during the procedure. Computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) demonstrated normal coronary arteries, confirmed on repeat invasive coronary angiography. Cold pressor testing was unsuccessful in reproducing vasospasm. Acute coronary syndrome treatment was discontinued, he received smoking cessation advice and Amlodipine 5 mg daily was started. He has experienced no further episodes of cardiac chest pain on follow-up consultation 7 months later.
Discussion
This is an unusual case of persistent, extensive coronary vasospasm in a patient without ongoing chest pain or ischaemic ECG changes. Intracoronary nitrates are usually effective at relieving coronary spasm. Cold pressor testing has poor sensitivity for diagnosing vasospasm when compared to intracoronary provocation testing using either acetylcholine or ergonovine. Multi-slice CTCA may help to discriminate coronary plaque from coronary vasospasm when there is diagnostic uncertainty.
Keywords: Case report, Coronary vasospasm, Acute coronary syndrome, Coronary angiography, Spontaneous coronary artery dissection, Computed tomography angiography, Multislice computed tomography
Learning points
Extensive, severe coronary vasospasm can present like an acute coronary syndrome and persistent spasm can exist without ongoing chest pain or electrocardiography changes.
Multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography may help to discriminate coronary plaque from vasospasm, thus preventing unnecessary, invasive treatment when there is diagnostic uncertainty.
Intracoronary nitrates are highly effective at relieving coronary vasospasm. Cold pressor testing is poorly sensitive for confirming a diagnosis of vasospasm when compared with pharmacological intracoronary provocation using either acetylcholine or ergonovine.
Introduction
Coronary vasospasm mimics acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in its presentation with chest pain, ischaemic electrocardiography (ECG) changes and elevated cardiac biomarkers.1 Initially described by Prinzmetal et al. in patients with normal or near-normal coronary arteries on invasive coronary angiography; it is characterized by an intense vasoconstriction resulting in total or near-total occlusion of one or more of the coronary vessels.2,3 Its pathophysiology is multifactorial relating to endothelial dysfunction and low-grade inflammation, occurring more frequently in smokers and at sites of significant coronary atherosclerosis.4,5 Definitive diagnosis can be made by intra-coronary provocation testing.6 We describe an unusual case of persistent, extensive coronary vasospasm without ongoing chest pain or ECG changes.
Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 22nd December 2019 | Admitted with troponin positive chest pain and normal electrocardiography findings. |
| 23rd December 2019 | Coronary angiography demonstrates multi-vessel stenoses—appearances are atypical of coronary plaque. |
| 24th December 2019 |
Computed tomography coronary angiography reveals normal coronary arteries—confirmed on repeat invasive coronary angiography. Patient remains pain free and is discharged from hospital. |
| July 2020 | No further episodes of cardiac chest pain on follow-up teleconsultation. |
Case presentation
A 37-year-old Caucasian male presented to the Emergency Department with chest pain. He described awaking with central chest tightness radiating to both arms lasting 20 min. The chest pain was associated with diaphoresis and resolved spontaneously. He smoked 10–15 cigarettes a day and had previously used anabolic steroids some 10–12 years ago, although denied any current drug use. His past medical history included a respiratory arrest following anaphylaxis to NSAIDs, asthma, and pulmonary sarcoidosis.
On examination, his body habitus was of muscular build; cardiac auscultation revealed no murmurs and there were no signs of heart failure. Serial ECGs during his hospital admission showed normal sinus rhythm with no dynamic or ischaemic changes (Figure 1). Full blood count and renal function were normal. High-sensitivity troponin-I was positive at 63 ng/L (99th percentile upper reference limit, <15 ng/L) with a repeat value of 45 ng/L approximately three and a half hours later. Serum cholesterol levels were elevated with a total cholesterol of 5.4 mmol/L, LDL 3.1 mmol/L, and triglycerides 2.9 mmol/L. He was treated as an ACS with dual anti-platelets, statin, and B-blocker therapy.
Figure 1.
Electrocardiography on admission showing no ischaemic changes.
Echocardiogram showed normal biventricular function with no obvious regional wall motion abnormalities (Videos 1–3). Coronary angiography was performed approximately 24 h following admission to the hospital, during which time the patient remained free of chest pain. Severe stenoses were observed at the ostium of a diagonal branch of the left anterior descending artery (LAD), proximal diagonal vessel, proximal intermediate artery, non-dominant circumflex (LCx), distal right coronary artery, and posterior descending artery (Figure 2A,B). There was also a moderate lesion in the mid-LAD at the bifurcation with the diagonal vessel (Supplementary material online, Videos S1 and S2). No ischaemic ECG changes were seen during coronary angiography.
Figure 2.
(A, B) Severe multi-vessel stenosis (indicated by red arrows) seen on invasive coronary angiography.
Angiographic appearances were atypical of coronary plaque and computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) was performed to exclude a differential diagnosis of spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD). This demonstrated normal coronary arteries (Figure 3A–C) and repeat invasive coronary angiography confirmed resolution of the severe coronary vasospasm seen previously (Supplementary material online, Videos S3 and S4). Cold pressor testing during coronary angiography was unsuccessful in reproducing vasospasm.
Figure 3.
(A–C) Three-dimensional reconstruction using computed tomography coronary angiography showing normal coronary arteries.
A drug screen was not performed at this stage as the patient had denied the recent use of illicit drugs and more than 48 h had passed from the time of presentation to the CT findings. Anti-platelet and statin treatment were discontinued; he was commenced on Amlodipine 5 mg daily and received smoking cessation advice prior to discharge from the hospital. At cardiology clinic follow-up, 7 months later, he has experienced no further episodes of cardiac chest pain.
Discussion
The case presented differs from the majority of published literature on coronary vasospasm due to the absence of chest pain and ECG changes at the time of invasive coronary angiography. Mohammed et al.7 reported a case of coronary vasospasm in a patient presenting with ST elevation on ECG and no chest pain. Coronary angiography showed no evidence of coronary vasospasm although provocation testing was not undertaken to confirm the diagnosis. Another study described an asymptomatic patient with an absence of ECG changes and a near-total occlusion of the atrioventricular groove branch of the circumflex artery on coronary angiography, which was relieved by intracoronary nitroglycerine (NTG).8
In our case, widespread severe coronary vasospasm was initially not suspected in a young male patient with few risk factors for coronary artery disease. A variation of >20% in high-sensitivity cardiac troponin is a predictor for adverse cardiac outcomes in ACS, thereby mandating the need for invasive coronary angiography.9 Intracoronary nitrates are almost always effective in relieving coronary vasospasm but were not administered on this occasion due to the low clinical suspicion.10 Although uncommon, type 3 SCAD may present with similar angiographic appearances to coronary atherosclerosis.11
Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is limited in its role in diagnosing SCAD or transient coronary vasospasm associated with small-sized infarcts and preserved left ventricular systolic function.12 Computed tomography coronary angiography has an emerging role for discriminating between coronary plaque, SCAD, and vasospasm due to its high plaque detectability and negative predictive value.13–16
The diagnosis of coronary vasospasm is suggested by a typical history of short-lasting angina attacks at rest, responding promptly to sublingual nitrates. Documentation of transient ST elevation (>1 mm) can confirm a diagnosis although in certain cases provocation testing may be required.6 Cold pressor testing is comparatively less sensitive in diagnosing vasospasm when compared to pharmacological methods using either ergonovine (ER) or acetylcholine (Ach). In a study of 34 patients, ER testing induced angina and ST elevation in 100% and 94% of cases, respectively, whereas cold pressor testing was sensitive in only 15% and 9% of cases.17 Neither ER nor Ach was used in this case due to a lack of familiarity of their use within our department.
Intracoronary imaging tools (IVUS and OCT) may have some benefit in confirming coronary vasospasm although again, clinical utility in severe cases is limited if the probe cannot traverse the lesion.18 As the differential included SCAD, it was not felt safe to use these invasive imaging techniques when an alternative safer investigation, CTCA, was available.
The management of coronary vasospasm involves modification of risk factors for coronary atherosclerosis and the use of vasodilator therapy, ACE inhibitors, and statins (Table 1).19 Calcium channel antagonists are effective in preventing coronary vasospasm in 90% of patients, while the addition of long-acting nitrates is helpful in controlling symptoms and those intolerant to calcium channel blockers.6 Drugs that may exacerbate coronary vasospasm should be avoided (Table 2).20 In severe refractory cases, percutaneous coronary intervention may be considered alongside other coronary vasodilator agents such as Nicorandil.6
Table 1.
Drug therapy for the treatment of coronary vasospasm
| Drug class | Examples and effective dosages | Mechanism of action |
|---|---|---|
| Calcium channel blockers |
|
|
| Long-acting nitrates |
|
|
| Other vasodilators |
|
|
| ACE inhibitors/ARBs |
|
|
| Statins |
|
|
Table 2.
Common and less commonly associated medications and drugs which may exacerbate coronary vasospasm
| Common | |
|---|---|
| 1. | Sumatriptan |
| 2. | Cocaine, amphetamines, ecstasy |
| 3. | Butane, toluene, glue inhalation |
| 4. | Cigarette smoking, nicotine |
| 5. | Alcohol |
| 6. | Acetylcholine |
| 7. | Ergonovine |
| 8. | α-Blockers, β-blockers |
| 9. | Diclofenac, NSAIDs, Aspirin |
| Uncommon | |
|---|---|
| 1. | Marijuana, heroin, khat (herbal ecstasy) |
| 2. | Anaesthetic agents e.g. propofol |
| 3. | Thyroxine |
| 4. | 5-Fluorouracil |
| 6. | Chemotherapeutic agents e.g. Capecitabine |
| 7. | Allopurinol |
| 8. | Bromocriptine |
| 9. | Amoxicillin |
Lead author biography

Dr James Tomlinson is a Cardiology Registrar working at The Royal Bournemouth Hospital in Dorset, United Kingdom. He is in his first year of Cardiology specialty training following achievement of the Membership of the Royal College of Physicians (UK) diploma and completion of Core Medical Training. His previous experience as a Cardiology Clinical Fellow in Bristol, UK has resulted in some early interest in the field of cardiac electrophysiology.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available at European Heart Journal - Case Reports online.
Slide sets: A fully edited slide set detailing these cases and suitable for local presentation is available online as Supplementary data.
Consent The authors confirm that written consent for submission and publication of this case report including images and associated text has been obtained from the patient in line with COPE guidance.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Funding: None declared.
Supplementary Material
References
- 1.Mishra PK. Variations in presentation and various options in management of variant angina. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 2006;29:748–759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Prinzmetal M, Kennamer R, Merliss R, Wada T, Bor N.. Angina pectoris I. A variant form of angina pectoris. Am J Med 1959;27:375–388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oliva PB, Potts DE, Pluss RG.. Coronary arterial spasm in prinzmetal angina. N Engl J Med 1973;288:745–751. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Kusama Y, Kodani E, Nakagomi A, Otsuka T, Atarashi H, Kishida H. et al. Variant angina and coronary artery spasm: the clinical spectrum, pathophysiology, and management. J Nippon Med Sch 2011;78:4–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Maseri A, Severi S, Nes M. D, L'Abbate A, Chierchia S, Marzilli M. et al. “Variant” angina: one aspect of a continuous spectrum of vasospastic myocardial ischaemia. Am J Cardiol 1978;42:1019–1035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lanza’ GA, Crea’ F. (n.d.). Vasospastic angina. [online] www.escardio.org. https://www.escardio.org/Journals/E-Journal-of-Cardiology-Practice/Volume-2/Vasospastic-Angina-Title-Vasospastic-Angina (23 August 2020).
- 7.Mohammed I, Zaatari MSE, Tyrogalas N, Khalid MI.. Asymptomatic coronary artery spasm with acute pathological ST elevation on routine ECG: is it common? BMJ Case Rep 2014:bcr2013202586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Nakad G, Bayeh H.. Unusual vasospastic angina: a documented asymptomatic spasm with normal ECG - a case report and a review of the literature. Case Rep Cardiol 2013;2013:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA. et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;72:2231–2264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Feldman RL, Hill JA, Conti JB, Conti CR, Pepine CJ.. Analysis of coronary responses to nifedipine alone and in combination with intracoronary nitroglycerin in patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 1983;105:651–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saw J, Starovoytov A, Humphries K, Sheth T, So D, Minhas K. et al. Canadian spontaneous coronary artery dissection cohort study: in-hospital and 30-day outcomes. Eur Heart J 2019;40:1188–1197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Saw J. Is there a role for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with SCAD? Eur Heart J 2020;41:2206–2208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Abbara S. Diagnostic performance of 64-multidetector row coronary computed tomographic angiography for evaluation of coronary artery stenosis in individuals without known coronary artery disease: results from the prospective multicenter ACCURACY (Assessment by Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography of Individuals Undergoing Invasive Coronary Angiography) trial. Yearbook Diagn Radiol 2009;2009:346–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kang KM, Choi SI, Chun EJ, Kim JA, Youn TJ, Choi DJ.. Coronary vasospastic angina: assessment by multidetector CT coronary angiography. Kor J Radiol 2012;1:27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ito K, Ogawa T, Yoshimura M.. Severe coronary spasm occasionally detected by coronary computed tomography. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2768–2768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nakayama M, Hirano M, Goto S, Watanabe A, Uchiyama T.. Coronary arterial spasm detected by coronary computed tomography angiography and confirmed by intravascular ultrasound. Radiol Case Rep 2018;13:14–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Waters DD, Szlachcic J, Bonan R, Miller DD, Dauwe F, Theroux P.. Comparative sensitivity of exercise, cold pressor and ergonovine testing in provoking attacks of variant angina in patients with active disease. Circulation 1983;67:310–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tweet MS, Gulati R, Williamson EE, Vrtiska TJ, Hayes SN.. Multimodality imaging for spontaneous coronary artery dissection in women. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2016;9:436–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kunadian V, Chieffo A, Camici PG, Berry C, Escaned J, Maas A.. An EAPCI expert consensus document on ischaemia with non-obstructive coronary arteries in collaboration with European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Coronary Pathophysiology & Microcirculation endorsed by Coronary Vasomotor Disorders International Study Group. Eur Heart J 2020;47:3504–3520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.El Menyar A. Drug-induced myocardial infarction secondary to coronary artery spasm in teenagers and young adults. J Postgrad Med 2006;52:51–56. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.



