Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0248394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248394

Anti-asthmatic effect of nitric oxide metallo-donor FOR811A [cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3] in the respiratory mechanics of Swiss mice

Paula Priscila Correia Costa 1,2,*, Stefanie Bressan Waller 1,*, Gilvan Ribeiro dos Santos 3, Fladimir de Lima Gondim 3, Daniel Silveira Serra 3, Francisco Sales Ávila Cavalcante 3, Florêncio Sousa Gouveia Júnior 4, Valdir Ferreira de Paula Júnior 5, Eduardo Henrique Silva Sousa 4, Luiz Gonzaga de França Lopes 4, Wesley Lyeverton Correia Ribeiro 2,*, Helena Serra Azul Monteiro 2
Editor: Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo6
PMCID: PMC7954307  PMID: 33711054

Abstract

We aimed at evaluating the anti-asthmatic effect of cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3 (FOR811A), a nitrosyl-ruthenium compound, in a murine model of allergic asthma. The anti-asthmatic effects were analyzed by measuring the mechanical lung and morphometrical parameters in female Swiss mice allocated in the following groups: untreated control (Ctl+Sal) and control treated with FOR811A (Ctl+FOR), along asthmatic groups untreated (Ast+Sal) and treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR). The drug-protein interaction was evaluated by in-silico assay using molecular docking. The results showed that the use of FOR811A in experimental asthma (Ast+FOR) decreased the pressure-volume curve, hysteresis, tissue elastance, tissue resistance, and airway resistance, similar to the control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR). However, it differed from the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal, p<0.05), indicating that FOR811A corrected the lung parenchyma and relaxed the smooth muscles of the bronchi. Similar to control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR), FOR811A increased the inspiratory capacity and static compliance in asthmatic animals (Ast+Sal, p<0.05), showing that this metallodrug improved the capacity of inspiration during asthma. The morphometric parameters showed that FOR811A decreased the alveolar collapse and kept the bronchoconstriction during asthma. Beyond that, the molecular docking using FOR811A showed a strong interaction in the distal portion of the heme group of the soluble guanylate cyclase, particularly with cysteine residue (Cys141). In summary, FOR811A relaxed bronchial smooth muscles and improved respiratory mechanics during asthma, providing a protective effect and promising use for the development of an anti-asthmatic drug.

Introduction

Asthma is a respiratory condition characterized by intense inflammation and hyperreactivity of the airways, leading to a significant increase in mucus secretion and respiratory resistance [1]. Therefore, granulocytes–eosinophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, and mast cells–are activated triggering contraction of the airway smooth muscle, in addition to microvascular leakage and mucus secretion [2, 3]. Thus, the main signs of asthma are shortness of breath, wheezing, coughing and tightness in the chest [4], which can even lead to death, mainly in individuals aged 65 and over [5].

According to the Global Initiative for Asthma [6], the current treatments consist of preventing airflow limitation and improving pulmonary conditions. Oral corticosteroids, ß-agonists, anti-inflammatories, and inhaled bronchodilators [7, 8] are examples of drugs available to control the disease. However, severe cases [9] are more difficult to control because said drugs may not be responsive, even at high doses [6, 10], which justifies the need for effective therapeutic alternatives.

One of the strategies for regulating the pathophysiological processes of asthma is the use of nitric oxide (NO), a small molecule of great importance in the modulation of cardiovascular, immunological, nervous, and even pulmonary processes [11]. In the respiratory tract, the nose and paranasal sinuses are the main production sites of exhaled NO [12], which activates the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) to significantly increase the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP).

In turn, the high production of cGMP will activate important protein kinases, which will act in the regulatory functions, such as smooth muscle relaxation, neuronal transmission, inhibition of platelet aggregation and regulation of vascular/bronchial tone and protective function against excessive bronchoconstriction [11, 12]. Having said that, the conditions of bronchoconstriction are modelled by NO, that acts as bronchodilator in the human lungs [13]. However, NO of endogenous origins has a short half-life, and deficiencies in its production that result in its inactivation, generating pathological conditions [11].

The use of compounds able to modulate the NO/sGC/cGMP pathways are valuable therapeutic agents, with emphasis on organic-based molecules complexed with ruthenium. Studies in the murine model have been promising with these potential metallodrugs as NO donors, such as cis-[Ru(bpy)2(ImN)(NO)]3+, where bpy = 2,2’-bipyridine and ImN = imidazole–known as FOR0811 –for the control of arterial hypertension [14]. Moreover, the nitrosyl-ruthenium complexes, such as [Ru(terpy)(bdq)NO+]3+–known as TERPY–, are promising due to the relaxant effect on the smooth muscles of the airways [15] and in the control of asthma [16]. Another nitrosyl-ruthenium complex is cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3 –known as FOR811A–, whose effect on acute inflammation [17] has been promising, however, it had never been studied for allergic asthma.

Given the potential of organic-based compounds of the nitrosyl-ruthenium, this study aimed at evaluating, for the first time, the effect of cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3 –FOR811A –on the mechanics in murine model induced to allergic asthma.

Materials and methods

Synthesis of ruthenium complexes

The ruthenium compound complexed with the nitric oxide (NO) molecule–cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3 –was synthesized at the Laboratory of Bioinorganic (Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza/CE, Brazil), according to Gouveia Júnior et al. [18]. This compound was called FOR811A, and its flat structure is shown in Fig 1. Briefly, 0.4 mmol of the precursor cis-[Ru(bpy)2Cl2] was reacted with equimolar amount of 2-methylimidazole in ethanol under reflux and magnetic stirring. After 2 hours, an equimolar amount of NaNO2 dissolved in water was added, keeping the system in the previous conditions for 2 more hours. After that, the solvent was removed through rotary evaporation and the crude product was mixed with a 10% HPF6 solution, giving the desired product as a light orange solid. Yield: 45%. HRESI-MS (+): [M– 3PF6]2+ theoretical: 263,0459 (C24H22N7ORu2+); experimental: 263,0459. Elemental analysis: Theoretical (C24H22F18N7OP3Ru): C, 30,01; H, 2,31; N, 10,21%. Experimental: C, 30,06; H, 2,38; N, 10,35%.

Fig 1. Chemical structure of the ruthenium complex cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3.

Fig 1

Experimental animals

For the experimental study, 15-weeks-old female Swiss mice (Mus musculus, n = 40) weighing between 25 and 30 grams were used. The animals were obtained from the Central Bioterium (Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza/CE, Brazil) and kept in cages containing five animals each. They were housed in controlled conditions of humidity, temperature (22°C), 12/12h light-dark cycle, and commercial diet and water ad libitum. This murine model was chosen because it does not show consanguinity, similarly to humans [19, 20], and because female mice seem to be more sensitive to develop allergic inflammations [21, 22]. All procedures were approved by the Ethics Committee for Use in Animals (Comitê de Ética para Uso em Animais–CEUA, State University of Ceará, no. 2068307/2018).

Experimental design and treatments

The animals were allocated to four experimental groups (n = 10 each): untreated control receiving saline solution (Ctl+Sal); control treated with FOR811A (Ctl+FOR); untreated asthmatic receiving saline solution (Ast+Sal); asthmatic treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR). On days 0, 7, and 14 of the experiment, the animals were sensitized (intraperitoneal injection, 0.2 mL) with 0.9% of saline solution (NaCl) for control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR) or ovalbumin (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis/MO, USA; 100 μg, dissolved in 5 mg of aluminum hydroxide–AlOH) for asthmatic groups (Ast+Sal; Ast+FOR).

On days 26, 27, and 28, all animals were placed individually in an acrylic box (30 × 15 × 20 cm) coupled to an ultrasonic nebulizer (US-1000, ICEL, São Paulo, Brazil) and submitted to the inhalation challenge. Control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR) were challenged to inhale 0.9% NaCl for 20 minutes, whereas the asthmatics groups (Ast+Sal; Ast+FOR) were challenged to inhale 50 μg ovalbumin at a concentration of 10 mg/mL for 20 minutes. All animals also received tramadol (5 mg/kg/8h, Cronidor 2%®, Agener União Saúde Animal Ltda., São Paulo/SP, Brazil) as an analgesic method to minimize pain, suffering and distress. Additionally, the post-challenge care included the monitoring the animals twice a day by veterinarians (8:00 am and 5:00 pm) for possible behavioral changes through the application of the Grimmace Scale. The researchers were previously trained to apply the "humanitarian endpoint", according to Brazilian legislation, if any animal had its welfare compromised. Normal interaction with other animals, amount of feeding, and volume of water ingested were also monitored.

On day 29, all animals received a single dose of oral treatment by gavage (0.2 mL). Control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR) received 0.9% NaCl, whereas the asthmatics groups (Ast+Sal; Ast+FOR) were treated with FOR811A at the concentration of 0.75 mg/kg. Finally, on day 30, the association between 10% ketamine hydrochloride (300 mg/kg, Cetamin®, Syntec, São Paulo/SP, Brazil) and α2-adrenergic receptor agonists 2% xylazine hydrochloride (30 mg/kg—Sedanew®, Vetnil, São Paulo/SP, Brazil) was used for the euthanasia of the mice by anesthetic overdose.

Evaluation of the mechanical lung measurements

An integrated platform was used for collecting data on pulmonary mechanics measurements (S1 Fig). The use of the mechanical respirator for small animals (FlexiVent, SCIREQ, Montréal, Canada) made it possible to apply arbitrary waveforms to the injected volumes or pressures applied to the lung, with the simultaneous acquisition of all determinant variables in the organ mechanics. Besides, the forced oscillation technique associated with the constant phase model [23] was used to extract the respective quantities, as it performs well in separating the mechanical properties of the airways and lung tissue.

To obtain the pressure-volume curve points, the pressure in the trachea was raised to 30 cmH2O at pre-established equally spaced pressure intervals, with records of the plateau volume values corresponding to these pressures. The same procedure, with decreases in pressure, was performed to obtain the expiratory branch of the curve. Thus, it was possible to simultaneously obtain the measurement of static compliance (Cstat), estimation of inspiratory capacity (IC), and calculation of the curve area. For the measurements of the parameters of the constant phase model, a quick-prime disturbance was applied, which consisted in the imposition of airflow with an amplitude corresponding to the sum of sine waves of frequencies between 1.00 to 20.5 Hz. The pressure and flow obtained from this disturbance were used to calculate the impedance of the respiratory system (Zrs), which was adjusted to the constant phase model [24]. Therefore, the values of airway resistance, also known as Newtonian resistance (RN), and the tissue resistance (G), tissue elastance (H) and hysteresis (η) were obtained.

After the connection of the animal to the ventilator, it was paralyzed with pancuronium bromide (0.5 mg/kg). During the five minutes that elapsed, possible leaks, obstructions, as well as the corrections in the positioning of the animal’s body to the ventilator and the confirmation of the absence of spontaneous inspirations were verified. Therefore, 12 quick-prime perturbations were performed to determine the parameters of the constant phase model (RN, G, H, and η).

Morphometrical parameters

After the pulmonary mechanics measurements, the lungs were perfused with saline, removed en bloc, kept at functional residual capacity and fixed in Millonig’s formaldehyde (100 mL HcHO, 900 mL H2O, 18.6 g NaH2PO4, 4.2 g NaOH) [25]. The pulmonary section slides were stained with Hematoxylin-Eosin (HE) and were examined under optical microscopy by blind reading, in which the experimental groups were unknown during the evaluator’s reading. For the examination, a 100-point reticle with 50 lines was used coupled to the eyepiece of a conventional microscope [26]. The fraction area of normal alveoli (%) and alveolar collapse (%) were analyzed quantitatively by the point-counting technique, whereas the air-space enlargement was quantified by the mean linear intercept length of the distal air spaces. The bronchoconstriction index (BCI) was determined by counting the no. of points in the airway lumen and interceptions through the airway wall, using a reticulum and the following formula:

BCI=AirwaylumenAirwaywallBCI=AirwaylumenAirwaywall

In silico assay

Edition of the protein and FOR811A

For the edition of the protein, a search for the three-dimensional model of the β subunit and the H-NOX domain (PDB: 4U99) was carried out in the Protein Database (PDB, https://www.rcsb.org). These structures were edited in PyMOL 2.0 (Schrödinger, LLC, Nova York, EUA) to add polar hydrogens and remove molecules of water. The FOR811A compound was designed in the MarvinSketch–v17.29 program (ChemAxon, Budapeste, Hungria). The analysis of the optimization of atomic geometry, energy minimization by the Density Functional Theory (DFT), and the refinement by calculating the charges of Gasteiger and Marsili [27] were performed in the AutoDockTools 1.5.6 program [28].

Molecular docking

To explore the drug-protein binding mechanisms, the Molegro Virtual Docker (MVD) was used. The docking parameters were those available in the MVD for anchoring (MolDock: anchoring score, rank score, and interaction energy scores) with information display (GRID). The fitting model had as its starting point the detection of the cavity in the region of the active site of H-NOX, taking into account the Heme group present in the structure. The grid settings (Search Space) obtained the following dimensions: X: -40.03; Y: -93.35; Z: 109.28 with a radius of 11 ångström (Å) to encompass both the distal and proximal site of the Heme group and the cysteine residue (Cys141). The MVD evolutionary algorithm was used for the benchmark, with the following data: number of executions, 10; population size, 50; maximum interaction, 2000; scale factor, 0.50; crossing rate, 90; and variation-based termination configuration. The program’s performance was 500un with the return of 10 promising poses of the FOR811A compound. The simulation was performed in a rigid body system for H-NOX.

Evaluation of interactions between FOR811A and protein

The results were filtered based on the anchoring score, rank score, and interaction energy scores, with the poses with the lowest binding free energy (kcal/mol) [29]. The atoms and residues involved in the ligand’s interactions with the receptor were observed by PyMOL 2.0 (Schrödinger, LLC, Nova York, USA) and Chimera.

Statistical analysis

The data of pulmonary mechanics were evaluated in the One-Way test of variance (ANOVA), followed by the Bonferroni test, using the GraphPad® Prism software, version 7.0. The results were presented as mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM), and values of p<0.05 were considered significant for the analysis.

Results

FOR811A decreased the pressure-volume curve (PV)

The pressure-volume curves (Fig 2A) for the untreated groups were higher in those with asthma (Ast+Sal) compared to healthy ones (Ctl+Sal), differing statistically (p<0.05). Among the asthmatic animals, the PV was 1.68 mL in the animals treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR) and 2.22 mL in the untreated group (Ast+Sal), showing that the metallocompound decreased the PV curve in 37.89% (p<0.05) on asthma pathogenic condition. There was no statistical difference between healthy animals (Ctl+Sal) and those treated with FOR811A. These findings showed that this metallocompound changed the PV curve in asthmatic condition (Ast+FOR), making it similar to that observed in the control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR).

Fig 2. Effect of the FOR811A, a ruthenium nitric oxide donor metallocompound, against experimentally induced asthma in a murine model.

Fig 2

The Swiss mice were divided into four groups (n = 10, each): untreated (Ctl+Sal) and treated (Ctl+FOR) control groups, and untreated (Ast+Sal) and treated (Ast+FOR) asthmatic groups. Using an integrated platform for pulmonary mechanic assay, the pressure-volume curve area (PV; expressed in mL; a) and the behavior of static compliance (Cstat; expressed in mL/cmH2O; b), hysteresis (η; c); inspiratory capacity (IC; expressed in mL; d); tissue resistance (G; expressed in cmH2O.s/mL; e); airway resistance (RN; expressed in cmH2O.s/mL; f) and tissue elastance (H; expressed in cmH2O.s/mL; g). Data were expressed as mean ± SEM. a p<0.05 (Ast+Sal) vs. (Ctl+Sal); b p<0.05 (Ast+FOR) vs. (Ast+Sal); c p<0.05 (Ast+FOR) vs. (Ctl+Sal).

FOR0811A maintained the static compliance (Cstat) normal

The static compliance (Fig 2B) was 0.073 mL/cmH2O in the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal), whereas in the untreated healthy group (Ctl+Sal) was 0.093 mL/cmH2O, showing that asthma decreased the pulmonary Cstat in 21.68% (p<0.05). However, when treated with FOR811A, the Cstat of the control (Ctl+FOR) and asthmatic (Ast+FOR) groups were similar (p>0.05), even when compared to untreated healthy groups (Ctl+Sal). These findings showed that the metallocompound improved the pulmonary Cstat in treated asthmatic animals (Ast+FOR), remaining unchanged under normal conditions.

FOR811A decreased the hysteresis (η)

Among untreated groups, the hysteresis (Fig 2C) was higher in animals with asthma (Ast+Sal) than in healthy animals (Ctl+Sal), showing that this pathogenic condition increased η in 42.46% (p<0.05). Among the asthmatic groups, the animals treated with FOR (Ast+FOR) presented 0.146 η, whereas in untreated animals (Asth+Sal) was 0.184 η. This finding showed that the metallocompound decreased the hysteresis by 32.59% during asthma (p<0.05). There was no statistical difference between the untreated control (Ctl+Sal) and the treated groups (Ctl+FOR; Ast+FOR).

FOR811A maintained the Inspiratory Capacity (IC) normal

The inspiratory capacity (Fig 2D) of the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) was 0.751 mL, whereas in the untreated control group (Ctl+Sal) was 0.988 mL, showing that asthma decreased the IC in 24.04% (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the healthy treated group (Ctl+FOR) and the asthmatic treated group (Ast+FOR) when compared to the healthy untreated group (Ctl+Sal). These results showed that the metallocompound increased the IC in asthmatic condition (Ast+FOR), maintaining normal in a similar way to the control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR).

FOR811A decreased the tissue resistance (G), airway resistance (RN), and tissue elastance (H)

The tissue resistance (Fig 2E) of the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) was 5.54 cmH2O.s/mL, whereas in the healthy untreated group (Ctl+Sal) was 3.05 cmH2O.s/mL, showing that asthma increased the G in 44.95% (p<0.05). However, the G in the treated asthmatic group (Ast+FOR) was 3.36 cmH2O.s/mL, whereas in the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) was 5.54 cmH2O.s/mL, showing that the metallocompound decreased the tissue resistance in 60.65% (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the treated healthy (Ctl+FOR) and the treated asthmatic (Ast+FOR) groups, and neither when both were compared to the untreated healthy group (Ctl+Sal). Based on these results, the metallocompound decreased tissue resistance, improving it even in asthmatic conditions.

The airway resistance (Fig 2F) in the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) was 0.241 cmH2O.s/mL, whereas in the untreated healthy group (Ctl+Sal) it was 0.162 cmH2O.s/mL, showing that asthma increased the RN in 67.2% (p<0.05). However, when comparing the RN of the treated asthmatic group (Ast+FOR), which was 0.162 cmH2O.s/mL, it was observed that the metallocompound promoted a decrease in the airway resistance by 32.8% during asthma (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the healthy (Ctl+FOR) and asthmatic (Ast+FOR) groups that received the metallocompound, nor when both were compared to the untreated healthy group (Ctl+Sal). These data supported that the FOR811A significantly decreased the RN in an asthmatic condition, remaining under normal conditions.

The tissue elastance (Fig 2G) of the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) was 30.29 cmH2O.s/mL, whereas in the untreated healthy group (Ctl+Sal) was 21.26 cmH2O.s/mL, showing that the parameter H was increased by 29.81% (p<0.05) during asthma. However, the H in the treated asthmatic group (Ast+FOR) was 23.36 cmH2O.s/mL, showing that the metallocompound decreased the tissue elastance in 22.82% during asthma condition (p<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the treated healthy (Ctl+FOR) and the treated asthmatic (Ast+FOR) groups, and neither when both were compared to the untreated healthy group (Ctl+Sal). In summary, the metallocompound decreased the pulmonary tissue elastance in asthmatic conditions, remaining under normal conditions.

FOR811A decreased the alveolar collapse and kept the bronchoconstriction

According to Table 1, the control groups (Ctl+Sal and Ctl+FOR) showed a high percentage of normal alveolar pattern with few areas of alveolar collapse, presenting a similar mean alveolar diameter and a similar BCI of 2.05±0.21 (Ctl+Sal) and 2.84±0.39 (Ctl+FOR). For the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal), a smaller normal alveolar area with a large area of the alveolar collapse was expected, resulting in a smaller mean alveolar diameter and a low rate of BCI of 1.99±0.17. Interestingly, the asthmatic group treated with the metallocompound (Ast+FOR) presented standards of normal alveoli, alveolar collapse, and mean alveolar diameter similar to those of the control groups, in which the BCI was 2.33±0.23. The reduction in the fractional area of collapsed alveoli (%), with less airway narrowing (BCI) in asthmatic animals by FOR811A (Ast+FOR) showed that this metallocompound attenuated the bronchoconstriction by promoting relaxation of smooth muscles. This action can be corroborated from data found in pulmonary mechanics, where the respiratory parameters of asthmatic animals treated with the metallocomposite were similar to those of the saline control group. This action likely occurred in the cysteine portion of the GCs enzyme, since these increase cGMP, which is important for smooth muscle relaxation.

Table 1. Morphometric parameters in the respiratory mechanics of asthmatic and non-asthmatic Swiss mice after treatment with the nitric oxide metallo-donor FOR811A.

Experimental groups Normal Alveoli (%) Alveolar Collapse (%) Mean Alveolar Diameter (μm) Bronchoconstriction index (BCI)
Ctl+Sal 90.03±2.36 9.97±2.36 44.56±3.31 2.05±0.21
Ast+Sal 71.58±6.22* 28.42±6.22* 35.54±5.56* 1.99±0.17
Ctl+FOR 94.25±2.26 5.75±2.26 46.11±7.12 2.84±0.39
Ast+FOR 83.31±4.98 16.69±4.98 41.20±5.88 2.33±0.23

Values are mean ± SD of the following groups: control treated with saline solution (Ctl+Sal), asthmatic treated with saline solution (Ast+Sal), control treated with FOR811A (Ctl+FOR) and asthmatic treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR). Data was collected in 10 matched fields per mouse. Values significantly different (p<0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test compared to the Ctl+Sal group (*), and no difference compared to Ctl+Sal group.

FOR811A interaction with the soluble guanylate cyclase enzyme

Through computational investigation of the interaction of the FOR811A on the geometric planes of the Heme group of the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC), it was observed that the distal portion of this group was strongly associated to the binding of the exogenous molecule (Fig 3A) in comparison to the proximal portion. Analysis of the drug-protein binding conformation, types of interactions, residues involved in the stabilization of the system stabilization, mechanisms, and conformational changes of the target enzyme in the FOR811A–H-NOX were performed. The results showed that the MolDock score was 119.282, the rank score was 1993.62 and the interaction score was –1.0376 during the inactive state of H-NOX. At the radius of 6 Å, the presence of six amino-acids–Ile5, Phe69, Gly70, Leu73, Leu77, Leu145 –was defined, which interacted sterically with the Cys141 residue, performing hydrogen bonding interaction with atoms ID N:17, N49 at 1.34 Å (Fig 3B and 3C).

Fig 3. Interaction of the FOR811A compound, a ruthenium nitric oxide donor metallocompound with anti-asthmatic potential, on the Heme portion of the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) enzyme.

Fig 3

Through the exploration of the potential drug-protein binding mechanisms by the molecular docking method, it was observed that FOR811A bound strongly to the distal portion of the Heme group of sGC, specifically interacting with the residue Cys141 (a). In this study with H-NOX, FOR811A was shown to interact with the thiol portion of the cysteine residue at position 141 (Cys 141) (b, c).

Discussion

This study used mice to assess bronchial asthma, as an experimental model that allows a wide allergic response similar to human asthma, including acute and late-phase responses. By using the methods proposed in the literature [30, 31], ovalbumin was used as an antigenic protein to promote systemic sensitization in experimental animals, followed by the inhalation challenge. Thus, for the first time, it was possible to carry out tests regarding the anti-asthmatic effect of the FOR811A on the pulmonary mechanics of Swiss mice successfully.

The analysis of the pressure-volume curve was highly evident in the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal), due to changes in the distribution of the surfactant on the alveolar surface and the presence of alveolar edema in these animals. In turn, this parameter was decreased in those asthmatic animals treated with the metallocompound (Ast+FOR), as well as in the untreated (Ctl+Sal) and treated (Ctl+FOR) control groups. It is known that asthma causes hyperinflation that alters the respiratory mechanics, increasing the functional residual capacity and rectifying the diaphragm position, due to the reduction in the strength of the respiratory muscles [32]. Because of lower muscle strength, due to hyperinflation and greater respiratory effort, the animals are at risk of muscle fatigue and consequent dyspnea and respiratory failure [33]. Therefore, asthma leads to a significant loss of respiratory muscle strength and mass [34], as seen in untreated asthmatic animals (Ast+Sal).

To assess the degree of lung extension for each increase in transpulmonary pressure (Cstat) and the maximum volume of inspiration after a baseline expiration (IC), the equation proposed by Salazar and Knowles was calculated [35] during the upper half of the expiatory branch of the PV curve to adjust these parameters. The results indicated that the untreated asthmatic animals (Ast+Sal) presented low values of Cstat and IC, in comparison to the remaining groups, as well as high values of tissue elastance (H). These data corroborate with pulmonary physiology, in which the static compliance is inversely proportional to tissue elastance [36], showing that this group had high difficulty in breathing inspiration, in addition to stiffening of lung tissue. Interestingly, these parameters–Cstat, CI e H–were statistically identical for the remaining groups (Ast+FOR; Ctl+FOR; Ctl+Sal), showing that the metallocompound improved the capacity for inspiration even in asthmatic conditions, as similarly to healthy animals.

The friction resulting from the detachment of the pulmonary, thoracic, and muscular tissues leads to tissue resistance (G) during the inspiration and expiration process [36], which was highly observed in untreated asthmatic animals (Ast+Sal). This finding results from hyperresponsiveness during allergic inflamed airways, as in asthma. This process occurs because there is a thickening of the airway mucosa and a greater propensity for them to close, even without increasing the degree of shortening of the airway smooth muscle [37].

In the case of airway resistance, which measures the degree of difficulty that airflow must move during the trachea-bronchial path [36], it was also possible to observe high values in the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) compared to the remaining groups (p<0.05). Considering that this parameter is inversely proportional to airflow [36], this finding showed that the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal) had less airflow, resulting in greater difficulty for the airflow to move along the lung tree.

This occurred because, during the pathogenesis of asthma, the high contractility of smooth muscle in the airways contributes to the increase in airway resistance [38]. Due to the reduction in the elastic recoil of the lung and the rupture of fibers, the destruction of alveolar attachments occurs, which limits airflow, causing an increase in airway resistance. Therefore, the air trapping and the new pulmonary morphology reduce the surface available for gas exchange [39]. Interestingly, the treated asthmatic group (Ast+FOR) showed low values of RN, as well as the control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR), revealing the maintenance of pulmonary architecture and smooth muscle relaxation tracheobronchial by FOR811A. This result showed that the metallocompound functioned similarly to conventional treatments, such as bronchodilators and corticosteroids [7, 8], which aim at reducing the airway resistance [6], reversing the asthma crisis.

Tissue resistance (G) and tissue elastance (H) are related to the intrinsic properties of the tissue, and the analysis of these parameters is not as simple as airway resistance (RN). This may be due to the alteration of the rheological properties of the tissue [40] or the influence of the narrowing of the airways on such parameters–G and H. Thus, it would result in a distortion of the lung parenchyma with the closure of small airways, constituting an effectively smaller lung, however, with a proportionally greater tissue elastance [37]. This directly proportional relationship was observed, since the untreated asthmatic animals (Ast+Sal) presented high values of G and H, as a result of the high RN, unlike the other groups (Ast+FOR; Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR). Therefore, the low values of G, H, and RN revealed that FOR811A maintained the pulmonary parenchyma and airway opening, even after the experimental induction of allergic asthma.

Hysteresis (η) occurs due to the resistance of the lung tissue [40], and it is calculated based on the relationship of parameters G and H. Therefore, hysteresis is determined by the elastic forces of the respiratory musculature and by the elastic forces caused by the surface tension of the liquid that lines the inner walls of the alveoli and other air spaces of the lung [36]. Hysteresis is also indicative of ventilatory heterogeneity since the value of η increases proportionally as the lung becomes mechanically heterogeneous [36]. Thus, the pathogenic asthma conditions, as in the untreated asthmatic group (Ast+Sal), cause a greater difference between the pulmonary inflation and deflation curve [40], due to the high resistance of the lung tissue. On the other hand, the treated asthmatic animals (Ast+FOR) showed normal values of η, similarly to the control groups (Ctl+Sal; Ctl+FOR), showing that FOR811A satisfactorily reduced pulmonary heterogeneity and atelectasis in the experimental animals.

The ruthenium-based compound normalized the pulmonary conditions during asthma, since the values of Cstat, IC, RN, G, H, and η were similar to the control groups. Additionally, the morphometric data supported that FOR811A decreased the area of alveolar collapse, allowing the bronchoconstriction, similarly to the control groups. In this way, our findings supported that FOR811A is indeed promising for the development of an anti-asthmatic pharmaceutical product. This anti-asthmatic effect could be explained by the activation of the enzyme sGC through its cysteine residue within the heme site, causing also the release of NO by the metallocompound, and further studies should be performed to confirm this hypothesis. It is known that NO can control the proliferation and differentiation of muscle cells through the activation of sGC and, consequently, increased levels of cGMP. On the other hand, it is also believed that NO can control some of these events through an independent mechanism, such as the formation of S-nitrosothiols, which can modulate the formation of muscle fibers [41].

In this way, the anti-asthmatic effect of FOR811A may be due to the donation of NO from this metallodrug, activating sGC through the rupture of histidine in the proximal site that is linked to iron, a well described process [42]. Beyond that and according to the results of molecular docking, FOR811A interacts with the enzyme sGC in the distal portion of the heme group, more specifically with the cysteine residue Cys141. It is possible that this interaction favors an in situ nitrosylation of this residue, where the RuII-NO+ moiety of FOR811A is prompt for this reaction. Indeed, full activation of sGC was shown to require not only heme Fe-NO formation but also nitrosylation of cysteine for full sGC activation [43]. Thus, NO from this compound along with an in situ nitrosilation of cysteine can fully activate sGC and promote this event [44]. That being said, it is believed that the anti-asthmatic activity of FOR811A was due to its action on the soluble guanylate cyclase enzyme, activating it to increase the production of cGMP. In turn, this would have acted directly on the smooth muscle cells of the airways, causing their relaxation, improving the mechanical pulmonary conditions in animals experimentally induced to asthma and treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR).

Conclusions

The use of the nitrosyl-ruthenium cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3, called FOR811A, allowed the relaxation of bronchial smooth muscles, improving the respiratory mechanics caused by the induction of asthma. Given the smooth muscle relaxation, this potential conferred a protective effect of asthmatic conditions, possibly due to its dual action on the cysteine and heme portion of the sGC enzyme.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Scheme of the integrated platform for data collection regarding pulmonary mechanics measurements.

Through a carbogen cylinder (A), oxygenation was maintained at a ratio of 95%:5% (O2:CO2). An air purification unit (B) was attached to the equipment responsible for maintaining the heating and humidification of the air (C) and the depressurizer (D), mechanical fan for small animals (E) and ultrasonic nebulizer (F). Also, a reservoir containing bronchoconstrictor (G) and a bed with heating support (H) for maintaining the body at a temperature of 37°C were available.

(TIF)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This study was financed by the Brazilian Institutes Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) under Grant CAPES/FUNCAP - 88881.166839/2018-01 (L.G.F. Lopes); and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) under Grant CNPq - 303355/2018-2 (L.G.F. Lopes) and 308383/2018-4 (E.H.S. Sousa).

References

  • 1.Alwarith J, Kahleova H, Crosby L, Brooks A, Brandon L, Levin SM, et al. The role of nutrition in asthma prevention and treatment. Nutr Rev. 2020;nuaa005:1–11. 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.King GG, Farrow CE, Chapman DG. Dismantling the pathophysiology of asthma using imaging. Eur Respir Rev. 2019;28:180111. 10.1183/16000617.0111-2018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Stone KD, Prussin C, Metcalfe DD. IgE, mast cells, basophils, and eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;125(2):S73–S80. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.11.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Moorman JE, Akinbami LJ, Bailey CM, Zahran HS, King ME, Johson CA, et al. National surveillance of asthma: United States, 2001–2010. Vital Health Stat. 2012;35:1–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Akinbami LJ, Moorman JE, Bailey C, Zahran HS, King M, Johnson CA, et al. Trends in asthma prevalence, health care use, and mortality in the United States, 2001–2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;94:1–8. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Global Initiative for Asthma. Diagnosis and Management of Difficult to Treat and Severe Asthma. 2019. Available from: https://www.ginasthma.org/severeasthma/
  • 7.Aljebab F, Choonara I, Conroy S. Systematic review of the toxicity of long-course oral corticosteroids in children. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0170259–e0170259. 10.1371/journal.pone.0170259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chung KF, Wenzel SE, Brozek JL, Bush A, Castro M, Sterk PJ, et al. International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. Eur Respir J. 2014;43(2):343–373. 10.1183/09031936.00202013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Calciano L, Corsico AG, Pirina P, Trucco G, Jarvis D, Janson C, et al. Assessment of asthma severity in adults with ever asthma: A continuous score. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(5):e0177538. 10.1371/journal.pone.0177538 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hekking PP, Wener RR, Amelink M, Zwinderman AH, Bouvy ML, Bel EH. The prevalence of severe refractory asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(4):896–902. 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Seabra AB, Duran N. Nanoparticulated Nitric Oxide Donors and their Biomedical Applications. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2017;17(3):216–223. 10.2174/1389557516666160808124624 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Maniscalco M, Sofia M, Pelaia G. Nitric oxide in upper airways inflammatory diseases. Inflamm Res. 2007;56:58–69. 10.1007/s00011-006-6111-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Karamaoun C, Muylem AV, Haut B. Modeling of the Nitric Oxide Transport in the Human Lungs. Front Physiol. 2016; 7:255. 10.3389/fphys.2016.00255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Costa PPC, Campos R, Cabral PHB, Gomes VM, Santos CF, Waller SB, et al. Antihypertensive potential of cis-[Ru(bpq)2(ImN))]3+, a ruthenium-based nitric oxide donor. Res Vet Sci. 2020;130:153–160. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.03.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Castro PF, Pereira AC, Rogrigues GJ, Batista AC, da Silva RS, Bendhack LM, et al. A new nitrosyl ruthenium complex nitric oxide donor presents higher efficacy than sodium nitroprusside on relaxation of airway smooth muscle. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011;43(5):370–377. 10.1016/j.ejps.2011.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Castro PF, de Andrade DL, Reis CF, Costa SH, Batista AC, da Silva RS, et al. Relaxing effect of a new ruthenium complex nitric oxide donor on airway smooth muscle of an experimental model of asthma in rats. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2016;43(2):221–229. 10.1111/1440-1681.12523 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Carvalho IO. Anti-inflammatory effect of the ruthenium complex FOR 811-A (cis-Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)]3+(PF6)) in the acute inflammation. M.Sc. Thesis, State University of Ceará, Fortaleza/CE, Brazil. 2019.
  • 18.Gouveia Júnior FS. New Ruthenium Complexes Containing Imidazolic Derivatives: Synthesis, Characterization and Therapeutic Potential Evaluation. M.Sc. Thesis, Federal University of Ceará. Fortaleza/CE, Brazil. 2017.
  • 19.Svenson KL, Gatti DM, Valdar W, Welsh CE, Cheng R, Chesler EJ, et al. High-resolution genetic mapping using the Mouse Diversity Outbred population. Genetics. 2012;190:437–447. 10.1534/genetics.111.132597 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Olson E, Graham D. Animal Models in Pharmacogenomics. In: Padmanabhan S, editor. Handbook of Pharmacogenomics and Stratified Medicine. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2014. pp. 73–87. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Letterio JJ, Roberts AB. Regulation of immune responses by TGF-β. Annu Rev Immunol. 1998;16:137–161. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.16.1.137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Blacquière MJ, Hylkema MN, Postma DS, Geerlings M, Timens W, Melgert BN. Airway Inflammation and Remodeling in Two Mouse Models of Asthma: Comparison of Males and Females. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2010;153(2):173–181. 10.1159/000312635 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hantos Z, Daróczy B, Suki B, Nagy S, Fredberg JJ. Input impedance and peripheral inhomogeneity of dog lungs. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1992;72(1):168–178. 10.1152/jappl.1992.72.1.168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Gomes RFM, Shen X, Ramchandani R, Tepper RS, Bates JHT. Comparative respiratory system mechanics in rodents. J Appl Physiol. 2000;89(3):908–916. 10.1152/jappl.2000.89.3.908 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Serra DS, de Sousa AM, Andrade LCS, Gondim FL, dos Santos JEÁ, de Oliveira MLM, et al. Effects of fixed oil of Caryocar coriaceum Wittm. Seeds on the respiratory system of rats in a short-term secondhand-smoke exposure model. J Ethnopharmacol. 2020;252:112633, 10.1016/j.jep.2020.112633 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Lanças T, Kasahara DI, Prado CM, Tibério IFLC, Martins MA, Dolhnikoff M. Comparison of early and late responses to antigen of sensitized guinea pig parenchymal lung strips. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100:1610–1616. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00828.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gasteiger J, Marsili M. Iterative partial equalization of orbital electronegativity—a rapid access to atomic charges. Tetrahedron. 1980;36(22):3219–3228. 10.1016/0040-4020(80)80168-2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, et al. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem. 1998;19(14):1639–1662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2004;3:935–949. 10.1038/nrd1549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Deng Y, Guan M, Xie X, Yang X, Xiang H, Li H, et al. Geniposide inhibits airway inflammation and hyperresponsiveness in a mouse model of asthma. Int Immunopharmacol. 2013;17(3):561–567. 10.1016/j.intimp.2013.06.028 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Misaka S, Sato H, Yamauchi Y, Onoue S, Yamada S. Novel dry powder formulation of ovalbumin for development of COPD-like animal model: Physicochemical characterization and biomarker profiling in rats. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2009;37(3–4):469–476. 10.1016/j.ejps.2009.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Oliveira CMG, Lanza FC, Solé D. Respiratory muscle strength in children and adolescents with asthma: similar to that of healthy subjects? J Bras Pneumol. 2012;38(3):308–314. 10.1590/s1806-37132012000300005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rodrigues F, Bárbara C. Pressões máximas respiratórias. Rev Port Pneumol. 2000;6(4):297–307. 10.1016/S0873-2159(15)30905-3 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Marcelino AM, da Cunha DA, da Cunha RA, da Silva HJ. Respiratory muscle strength in asthmatic children. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2012;16(4):492–496. 10.7162/S1809-97772012000400010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Salazar E, Knowles JH. An analysis of pressure-volume characteristics of the lungs. J Appl Physiol. 1964;19(1):97–104. 10.1152/jappl.1964.19.1.97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guyton AC, Hall JE. Textbook of Medical Physiology. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wagers S, Lundblad LK, Ekman M, Irvin CG, Bates JH. The allergic mouse model of asthma: normal smooth muscle in an abnormal lung? J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004;96(6):2019–2027. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00924.2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kim HR, Hoque M, Hai CM. Cholinergic receptor-mediated differential cytoskeletal recruitment of actin- and integrin-binding proteins in intact airway smooth muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004;287(5):C1375–C1383. 10.1152/ajpcell.00100.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ishizawa K, Kubo H, Yamada M, Kobayashi S, Numasaki M, Ueda S. Bone marrow-derived cells contribute to lung regeneration after elastase-induced pulmonary emphysema. FEBS Lett. 2004;556(1–3):249–252. 10.1016/s0014-5793(03)01399-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bates JT. Lung mechanics: An inverse modeling approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009 [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yamashita AMS, Ancillotti MTC, Rangel LP, Fontenele M, Figueiredo-Freitas C, Possidonio AC, et al. Balance between S-nitrosylation and denitrosylation modulates myoblast proliferation independently of soluble guanylyl cyclase activation. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2017;313(1):C11–C26. 10.1152/ajpcell.00140.2016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ignarro LJ, Wood KS, Wolin MS. Activation of purified soluble guanylate cyclase by protoporphyrin IX. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1982;79(9):2870–2873. 10.1073/pnas.79.9.2870 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hosrt BG, Marletta MA. Physiological activation and deactivation of soluble guanylate cyclase. Nitric Oxide. 2018;77:65–74. 10.1016/j.niox.2018.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Fernhoff NB, Derbyshire ER, Marletta MA. A nitric oxide/cysteine interaction mediates the activation of soluble guanylate cyclase. PNAS. 2009;106(51):21602–21607. 10.1073/pnas.0911083106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo

3 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-30462

Anti-asthmatic effect of nitric oxide metallo-donor FOR811A [cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)]3+(PF6)3] in the respiratory mechanics of Swiss mice

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Stefanie Waller,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

This paper is interesting but it needs a significant revision following reviewers' suggestions.

In conclusion the author should not use the term respiratory failure which means alteration in gas exchange but it is correct the term respiratory mechanics.

In addition, the authors should cite at least 1 or 2 reviews on the role of nitric oxide in respiratory system, especially in a model of bronchoconstriction.

Please submit your revised manuscript by December 15th. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. At this time, we request that you  please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the original source of mice used in the study

(2) Please describe any steps taken to minimize animal suffering and distress from the asthma challenge, such as by administering anaesthesia

(3) Please describe the post-challenge care received by the animals, including the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being.

Thank you for your attention to these requests.

3. In your Methods section, please state the source of the ovalbumin used in your study.

4. Please ensure your Methods and reagents are be described in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce the experiments described. Specifically, please provide further details on the synthesis of FOR811A, including a short summary of the synthesis conditions, and any chemical characterisation that was performed.

5. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide the method of euthanasia in the Methods section of your manuscript.

6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This paper is interesting but it needs a significant revision following reviewers' suggestions.

In conclusion the author should not use the term respiratory failure which means alteration in gas exchange but it is correct the term respiratory mechanics.

In addition, the authors should cite at least 1 or 2 reviews on the role of nitric oxide in respiratory system, especially in a model of bronchoconstriction.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: In their manuscript, Costa and collaborators demonstrated that the administration of FOR811A, a compound containing ruthenium, is able to preserve inspiratory abilities in a mouse model of asthma.

However, the authors mention in their introduction that another ruthenium-containing compound (TERPY) is already capable of controlling asthma. So what are the advantages and disadvantages of FOR811A compared to TERPY?

Why did the authors choose to use female Swiss mice? Have any sampling power studies been performed? Furthermore, the ways of sacrificing animals are not described in the manuscript.

Finally, the interaction studies between molecules seem to have been done exclusively through software simulation. Would it be possible to carry out an experimental analysis in order to actually verify the identified interactions and possibly exclude others that were not detected?

Reviewer #2: Costa and coworkers assessed the effect of a new metallodrug known as FOR811A on allergic asthma murine model. The authors revealed improvements in the pulmonary mechanics in mice treated with FOR811A suggesting that the effectiveness of FOR811A is due to the interaction between the drug and the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). Thus resulting in a significant increase in the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP).

It is an interesting study, but the following should be addressed:

Major comments:

1) In my opinion, the abstract need to be rewritten because of its confusing structure.

2) The authors performed their experiments on 40 Swiss female mice. What was the reasoning behind the choice to use only female mice as a model?

3) In the results section (page 11, lines 301-302) the authors state: “These findings highlighted that the metallodrug FOR811A allowed the bronchoconstriction activity because it decreased alveolar collapse during asthma.” Please explain the meaning of the sentence more clearly.

4) In the discussion section Costa et al., declare that the anti-asthmatic effect of FOR811A can be explained by the activation of the enzyme soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) in the cysteine portion, causing the release of NO by the metallodrug (page 14, lines 421-423). The data reported in this article do not support the conclusion provided by the authors. They should attempt to validate this hypothesis with experimental data. The authors could measure the sGC activity by enzyme assay.

5) The paper needs to be proofread by a native English speaker to correct several inaccuracies in English.

Minor comments:

1) In the “Experimental Design and Treatments” the authors should define the meaning of “Sal” (page 4, line 107).

2) Please rewrite Figure Legend 1 because is confused and unclear.

3) In the caption of Table 1 the authors state: “Values significantly different (p<0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test compared to the Ctl+Sal group (*), and no difference compared to Ctl+Sal group (a).” In my opinion, the authors could avoid indicating the absence of statistically significant differences and remove “a”.

4) Figure 3 (legend): the authors should describe the figure more clearly.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0248394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248394.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Jan 2021

Dear,

The authors are grateful for the suggestions. Please, the responses below.

Editor comments:

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming.

Answer: The authors are grateful for the suggestions. Furthermore, all changes suggested by the Editor are presented in PINK in the manuscript. Additionally, a structural change was made to the subtitles of the results, where “FOR811A decreased the Tissue Resistance (G)” (line 257), “FOR811A decreased the Airway Resistance (RN)” (line 268), and “FOR811A decreased the Tissue Elastance (H)” (line 279) were unified to “FOR811A decreased the Tissue Resistance (G), Airway Resistance (RN), and Tissue Elastance (H)” (lines 283-284).

2. At this time, we request that you please report additional details in your Methods section regarding animal care, as per our editorial guidelines:

(1) Please state the original source of mice used in the study

Answer: The animals were obtained from the central vivarium of Federal University of Ceará (UFC, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil). This information is shown in the text in: “The animals were obtained from the Central Bioterium (Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza/CE, Brazil)” (lines 110-111).

(2) Please describe any steps taken to minimize animal suffering and distress from the asthma challenge, such as by administering anaesthesia

Answer: In order to minimize animal suffering and distress from the asthma challenge, all animals received Tramadol as an analgesic opioid. Therefore, the following sentence has been added to the text: “All animals also received tramadol (5 mg/kg/8h, Cronidor 2%®, Agener União Saúde Animal Ltda., São Paulo/SP, Brazil/SP, Brazil) as an analgesic method to minimize pain, suffering and distress” (lines 134-136).

(3) Please describe the post-challenge care received by the animals, including the frequency of monitoring and the criteria used to assess animal health and well-being.

Answer: Right. The requested information has been added in the text in the following sentence: “Additionally, the post-challenge care included the monitoring of the animals twice a day by veterinarians (8:00 am and 5:00 pm) for possible behavioral changes through the application of the Grimmace Scale. The researchers were previously trained to apply the "humanitarian endpoint", according to the Brazilian legislation, if any animal had its welfare compromised. Normal interaction with other animals, amount of feeding, and volume of water ingested were also monitored” (lines 136-141).

3. In your Methods section, please state the source of the ovalbumin used in your study.

Answer: Right. The sentence “ovalbumin (100 μg, dissolved in 5 mg of aluminum hydroxide – AlOH)” (lines 110-111) was updated to “ovalbumin (Sigma-Aldrich®, St. Louis/MO, USA; 100 μg, dissolved in 5 mg of aluminum hydroxide – AlOH)” (lines 126-127).

4. Please ensure your Methods and reagents are described in sufficient detail for another researcher to reproduce the experiments described. Specifically, please provide further details on the synthesis of FOR811A, including a short summary of the synthesis conditions, and any chemical characterisation that was performed.

Answer: Right. This information has been added in the following sentence: “Briefly, 0.4 mmol of the precursor cis-[Ru(bpy)2Cl2] was reacted with equimolar amount of 2-methylimidazole in ethanol under reflux and magnetic stirring. After 2 hours, an equimolar amount of NaNO2 dissolved in water was added, keeping the system in the previous conditions for 2 more hours. After that, the solvent was removed through rotary evaporation and the crude product was mixed with a 10% HPF6 solution, giving the desired product as a light orange solid. Yield: 45%. HRESI-MS (+): [M – 3PF6]2+ theoretical: 263,0459 (C24H22N7ORu2+); experimental: 263,0459. Elemental analysis: Theoretical (C24H22F18N7OP3Ru): C, 30,01; H, 2,31; N, 10,21%. Experimental: C, 30,06; H, 2,38; N, 10,35%.” (lines 95-103).

5. To comply with PLOS ONE submissions requirements, please provide the method of euthanasia in the Methods section of your manuscript.

Answer: The method of euthanasia was provided in the text. in order to ease the reading, the sentence “Finally, on day 30, all animals were subjected to sedative and anesthetic induction with ketamine (10 mg/kg) associated with xylazine (2 mg/kg), both intraperitoneally, to allow the assessment of pulmonary mechanics measurements.” (lines 122-124) was updated to “Finally, on day 30, the association between 10% ketamine hydrochloride (300 mg/kg, Cetamin®, Syntec, São Paulo/SP, Brazil) and α2-adrenergic receptor agonists 2% xylazine hydrochloride (30 mg/kg - Sedanew®, Vetnil, São Paulo/SP, Brazil) was used for the euthanasia of mice by anesthetic overdose.” (lines 145-148).

6. Your ethics statement should only appear in the Methods section of your manuscript. If your ethics statement is written in any section besides the Methods, please delete it from any other section.

Answer: You are right. The ethics statement presented at the end of the manuscript has been removed. Currently, said information is only shown in the Methods section.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

This paper is interesting but it needs a significant revision following reviewers' suggestions.

In conclusion the author should not use the term respiratory failure which means alteration in gas exchange but it is correct the term respiratory mechanics.

Answer: …You are right. The text was verified, and the term “respiratory mechanics” was preserved. As such, the sentence “…and improved respiratory failure during asthma …” (line 44) has been updated to “…and improved respiratory mechanics during asthma …” (line 41), as well as the sentence “…improving the respiratory failure caused by the …” (lines 443-444) has been updated to “…improving the respiratory mechanics caused by the …” (lines 479-480).

In addition, the authors should cite at least 1 or 2 reviews on the role of nitric oxide in respiratory system, especially in a model of bronchoconstriction.

Answer: Right. The role of nitric oxide in bronchoconstriction condition was briefly described, as shown by Karamaoun et al., 2016 (Modeling of the Nitric Oxide Transport in the Human Lungs. Front Physiol. 7:255. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00255). Hence, the sentence “…against excessive bronchoconstriction [11,12]. However, NO of endogenous origin has …” (lines 71-72) has been updated to “…against excessive bronchoconstriction [11,12]. Having said that, the conditions of bronchoconstriction are modelled by NO, that acts as bronchodilator in the human lungs [13]. However, NO of endogenous origin has …” (lines 68-70). Additionally, all references have been updated in terms of numbering.

Reviewer #1:

In their manuscript, Costa and collaborators demonstrated that the administration of FOR811A, a

compound containing ruthenium, is able to preserve inspiratory abilities in a mouse model of asthma.

However, the authors mention in their introduction that another ruthenium-containing compound (TERPY) is already capable of controlling asthma. So what are the advantages and disadvantages of FOR811A compared to TERPY?

Answer: Thank you for the suggestion. All changes have been presented in YELLOW in the manuscript. In a study evaluating the participation of endogenous nitric oxide (NO) under the relaxation caused by FOR811A under aortic rings of Wistar rats, TERPY presented negative modulation with loss of potency under intact endothelium and preparations devoid of endothelium, unlike FOR811A, which maintained power and effectiveness (BONAVENTURA et al., 2009). This difference was justified by the fact that, in TERPY, the metabolite [Ru(H2O)(bdq)(terpy)]2+ is released along with NO, inducing oxidation of the BH4 cofactor, forming dihydrobiopterine (BH2) and biopterin, which may be responsible for uncoupling nitric oxide endothelial synthase (eNOS). In the vascular environment, eNOs can have a profound effect on the bioavailability of NO, decreasing its production and increasing the production of superoxides (BONAVENTURA et al., 2009; POTJE et al., 2014). In another study with ruthenium complex [Ru(terpy)(bdq)NO+]3+ (TERPY), Bonaventura et al. (2009) observed negative modulation in preparations that contained indomethacin, indicating the involvement of prostanoids in the vasodilator mechanism of this compound. The increase in cGMP levels and the simultaneous activation of PKG reduce the intracellular Ca2+ concentration by different mechanisms, such as the activation of K+ channels and the inhibition of Ca2+ L-type channels (MERY et al., 1991) or direct activation of these channels for K+ by NO (BOLOTINA et al., 1994) indirectly by cGMP (ROBERTSON et al., 1993). These findings demonstrated, therefore, that indomethacin does not modify the potency and effectiveness of FOR811A in relaxing the aortic rings, unlike TERPY, constituting an advantage over the other ruthenium complex. In addition, the opening of these channels in vascular smooth muscle cells causes the efflux of this ion, which generates membrane hyperpolarization. This reduces the influx of Ca2+ via voltage operated channels, with consequent vasodilation (JACKSON, 2017). Thus, the contribution of channels to K+ in relaxation induced by FOR811A was studied using a non-selective blocker of these channels, tetraethylammonium (10 mmol / L). This blocks different types of K+ channels with different degrees of effectiveness (PEREIRA et al., 2013). In preparations pre-incubated with this blocker, there was a shift in the concentration-effect curve to the left, demonstrating a concentration-dependent increase in the power of FOR811A. In TERPY, the concentration-effect curve is shifted to the right, showing a concentration-dependent reduction in TERPY power (Bonaventura 2007). However, the results of tetraethylammonium in FOR811A preparations are a type of finding not yet described in ruthenium complexes.

● BOLOTINA, V. M., et al. Nitric oxide directly activates calcium-dependent potassium channels in vascular smooth muscle cells. Nature, v. 368, p. 850-853, 1994.

● BONAVENTURA, D. et al. Endothelium negatively modulates the vascular relaxation induced by nitric oxide donor, due to uncoupling NO synthase. J. Inorg. Biochem., v. 103, n. 10, p. 1366-1374, 2009.

● JACKSON, W. F. Potassium channels in regulation of vascular smooth muscle contraction and

● growth. Adv. Pharmacol., v. 78, p. 89-144, 2017.

● POTJE, S. R. et al. Mechanisms underlying the hypotensive and vasodilator effects of [Ru(terpy)(bdq)NO]3+, a nitric oxide donor, differ between normotensive and spontaneously hypertensive rats. Eur. J. Pharmacol., v. 741, p. 222-229, 2014.

● MERY, P. F.; LOHMANN, S. M.; FISCHMEISTER, R. Ca2+ current is regulated by cyclic GMP dependent protein kinase in mammalian cardiac myocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., v. 88, n. 4, p. 1197-1201, 1991.

● ROBERTSON, B. E. et al. cGMP-dependent protein kinase activates Ca-activated K channels in cerebral artery smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol., v. 265, n. 1 (pt. 1), c. 299-303, 1993.

Why did the authors choose to use female Swiss mice? Have any sampling power studies been performed?

Answer: The use of Outbred mice (Swiss mice) was used due to the fact that the human species is not consanguineous, in order to facilitate the extrapolation of results in humans (Olson and Graham, 2014 - Animal Models in Pharmacogenomics, Chapter 5, Editor(s): Sandosh Padmanabhan, Handbook of Pharmacogenomics and Stratified Medicine, Academic Press, 2014, Pages 73-87). The use of Diversity Outbred (DO) mice is a new population, whose level of genetic diversity is at the same level as humans and non-human primates (Svenson et al., 2012 - High-resolution genetic mapping using the Mouse Diversity Outbred population. Genetics 2014;190:437–447. doi:10.1534/genetics.111.132597). In relation to sex, it has been shown that female mice are more susceptible to severe allergic inflammation than males (Blacquière et al. 2010 - Airway Inflammation and Remodeling in Two Mouse Models of Asthma: Comparison of Males and Females. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010;153:173-181. doi: 10.1159/000312635). This may be related to the low levels of TGF- β1 observed in female mice (Letterio and Roberts, 1988 - Regulation of immune responses by TGF. Annu Rev Immunol;16:137–161). In order to reduce the number of animals used in our study, we opted for an experimental model in which the inflammation was likely more exacerbated for us to have more reliable results on the effect of FOR811A in experimental asthma. The results obtained with the use of Swiss mice allowed us to understand the anti-asthmatic effect of FOR811A, and set the stage for efforts to discover this compound, which are underway.

For text improvements, the sentence “...and commercial diet and water ad libitum. All procedures...” (lines 102-103) has been updated to “…and commercial diet and water ad libitum. This murine model was chosen because it does not show consanguinity, similarly to humans [19, 20], and because female mice seem to be more sensitive to develop allergic inflammation [21, 22]. All procedures …” (lines 113-116).

Furthermore, the ways of sacrificing animals are not described in the manuscript.

Answer: The method of euthanasia was provided in the text in PINK. The sentence “Finally, on day 30, all animals were subjected to sedative and anesthetic induction with ketamine (10 mg/kg) associated with xylazine (2 mg/kg), both intraperitoneally, to allow the assessment of pulmonary mechanics measurements.” (lines 122-124) has been updated to “Finally, on day 30, the association between 10% ketamine hydrochloride (300 mg/kg, Cetamin®, Syntec, São Paulo/SP, Brazil) and α2-adrenergic receptor agonists 2% xylazine hydrochloride (30 mg/kg - Sedanew®, Vetnil, São Paulo/SP, Brazil) was used for the euthanasia of mice by anesthetic overdose.” (lines 145-148).

Finally, the interaction studies between molecules seem to have been done exclusively through software simulation. Would it be possible to carry out an experimental analysis in order to actually verify the identified interactions and possibly exclude others that were not detected?.

Answer: Unfortunately, due to operational limitations, it is not possible to perform such tests. However, the increase in cGMP expected through the interactions seen in docking was confirmed in experiments carried out by our group: Silveira (2019) and Alves (2018).

● ALVES, N.T.Q. Renal effects of ruthenium complexes and their action in the protection of acute injury induced by ischemia and reperfusion. Thesis, Post-Graduation Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Ceará, 2018. 109 p. [in Portuguese]

● SILVEIRA, J.A.M. Pharmacological characterization of the vasodilating activity of new ruthenium complexes containing imidazole derivatives. Thesis, Post-Graduation Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Ceará, 2019. 147 p. [in Portuguese]

Reviewer #2:

Costa and coworkers assessed the effect of a new metallodrug known as FOR811A on allergic asthma murine model. The authors revealed improvements in the pulmonary mechanics in mice treated with FOR811A suggesting that the effectiveness of FOR811A is due to the interaction between the drug and the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC). Thus resulting in a significant increase in the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). It is an interesting study, but the following should be addressed:

Answer: Thanks for the suggestions. All changes were performed in GREEN in the manuscript.

Major comments:

1) In my opinion, the abstract needs to be rewritten because of its confusing structure.

Answer: Right. We updated the abstract for improvements. Please, see abstract with correction in green color (lines 22-42).

2) The authors performed their experiments on 40 Swiss female mice. What was the reasoning behind the choice to use only female mice as a model?

Answer: The use of female mice was based to the greater susceptibility to develop severe allergic inflammation than males (Blacquière et al. 2010 - Airway Inflammation and Remodeling in Two Mouse Models of Asthma: Comparison of Males and Females. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010;153:173-181. doi: 10.1159/000312635). This may be related to low levels of TGF- β1 observed in female mice (Letterio and Roberts, 1988 - Regulation of immune responses by TGF- $ . Annu Rev Immunol;16:137–161). For text improvements, the sentence “...and commercial diet and water ad libitum. All procedures...” (lines 102-103) has been updated to “…and commercial diet and water ad libitum. This murine model was chosen because it does not show consanguinity, similarly to humans [19, 20], and because female mice seem to be more sensitive to develop allergic inflammation [21, 22]. All procedures …” (lines 113-116). This change was highlighted in YELLOW in the text.

3) In the results section (page 11, lines 301-302) the authors state: “These findings highlighted that the metallodrug FOR811A allowed the bronchoconstriction activity because it decreased alveolar collapse during asthma.” Please explain the meaning of the sentence more clearly.

Answer: Right. The finding indicated that the FOR811A attenuated the bronchoconstriction activity, and this can be explained by the lower narrowing of the airways (Table 1) probably because it prevented the inflammatory process. The morphometric study of the pulmonary parenchyma showed a reduction in the fractional area of collapsed alveoli (%), with less airway narrowing (BCI), showing that FOR811A attenuated the bronchoconstriction of asthmatic animals, by promoting relaxation of smooth muscles. This action probably occurred in the cysteine portion of the GCs enzyme, since this increases cGMP, which is important for smooth muscle relaxation. For text improvements, the sentence “These findings highlighted that the metallodrug FOR811A allowed the bronchoconstriction activity because it decreased alveolar collapse during asthma.” (lines 301-302) has been updated to “The reduction in the fractional area of collapsed alveoli (%), with less airway narrowing (BCI) in asthmatic animals by FOR811A (Ast+FOR) showed that this metallocompound attenuated the bronchoconstriction by promoting relaxation of smooth muscles. This action can be corroborated from data found in pulmonary mechanics, where the respiratory parameters of asthmatic animals treated with the metallocomposite were similar to those of the saline control group. This action probably occurred in the cysteine portion of the GCs enzyme, since these increase cGMP, which is important for smooth muscle relaxation” (lines 326-333).

4) In the discussion section Costa et al., declare that the anti-asthmatic effect of FOR811A can be explained by the activation of the enzyme soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) in the cysteine portion, causing the release of NO by the metallodrug (page 14, lines 421-423). The data reported in this article do not support the conclusion provided by the authors. They should attempt to validate this hypothesis with experimental data. The authors could measure the sGC activity by enzyme assay.

Answer: You are right. Unfortunately, due to operational limitations, it was not possible to measure cGMP during the period of this experiment. In previous experiments carried out by our research group on aortic and kidney rings, an increase in cGMP was demonstrated through docking. In the study by Silveira (2019), the production of tissue cGMP induced by FOR811A was measured in aortic rings and revealed an increase in this nucleotide between the control and the group tested with FOR811A. Another important point is that this increase occurred even in the presence of ODQ, a selective inhibitor of GCs that was used to verify the participation of this enzyme in the relaxation induced by compounds that possibly act in this pathway (ZHAO et al., 2000). Sensitivity to inhibition of vascular relaxation by ODQ indicates a predominant heme mechanism for sGC activation, while resistance to ODQ suggests the possible presence of alternative vasorelaxing mechanisms. When incubating with ODQ, it was observed that there was no significant change in tissue cGMP values between the preparations devoid of this blocker and tested with FOR811A. This could suggest that the FOR811A may possibly act in a different way - such as direct activation of the channels for K+. Another behavior that can be estimated from the molecules is that they are activators of sGC, since, even with the oxidized enzyme, there was no change in the tissue expression of the cyclic nucleotide; a fact that would occur in the opposite way if the compounds were stimulators of sGC, resulting in a reduction of tissue expression of cGMP (PRIVIERO et al., 2005). In another study conducted by our group, the increase in cGMP in renal tissue was also visualized (ALVES, 2018), corroborating the results of Silveira (2019) and the results presented in our article, through docking.

● ALVES, N.T.Q. Renal effects of ruthenium complexes and their action in the protection of acute injury induced by ischemia and reperfusion. Thesis, Post-Graduation Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Ceará, 2018. 109 p. [in Portuguese]

● PRIVIERO, F. B. M. et al. Mechanisms underlying relaxation of rabbit aorta by BAY 41-2272, a nitric oxide independent soluble guanylate cyclase activator. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol., v. 32, n. 9, p. 728-734, 2005.

● SILVEIRA, J.A.M. Pharmacological characterization of the vasodilating activity of new ruthenium complexes containing imidazole derivatives. Thesis, Post-Graduation Program in Pharmacology, Federal University of Ceará, 2019. 147 p. [in Portuguese]

● ZHAO, Y. et al. Inhibition of soluble guanylate cyclase by ODQ. Biochemistry, v. 39, n. 35, p. 10848-10854, 2000.

In this way, we have performed changes for text improvement. therefore, the sentence “This anti-asthmatic effect can be explained by the activation of the enzyme soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) in the cysteine portion, causing the release of NO by the metallodrug.” (lines 421-423) has been updated to “This anti-asthmatic effect could be explained by the activation of the enzyme sGC through its cysteine residue within the heme site, causing also the release of NO by the metallocompound, and further studies should be performed to confirm this hypothesis” (lines 453-456).

5) The paper needs to be proofread by a native English speaker to correct several inaccuracies in English.

Answer: You are right. As required, a professional did the corrections in the present version.

Minor comments:

1) In the “Experimental Design and Treatments” the authors should define the meaning of “Sal” (page 4, line 107).

Answer: You are right. The sentence “…untreated controls (Ctl+Sal); control treated with FOR811A (Ctl+FOR); untreated asthmatic (Ast+Sal); asthmatic treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR).” (lines 106-108) has been updated to “…untreated control receiving saline solution (Ctl+Sal); control treated with FOR811A (Ctl+FOR); untreated asthmatic receiving saline solution (Ast+Sal); asthmatic treated with FOR811A (Ast+FOR).” (lines 121-124).

2) Please rewrite Figure Legend 1 because is confused and unclear.

Answer: Right. The figure legend 1 “Fig. 1. Flat chemical structure of the ruthenium complex cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)]3(PG6)3.” has been updated to “Fig. 1. Chemical structure of the ruthenium complex cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3.”.

3) In the caption of Table 1 the authors state: “Values significantly different (p<0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test compared to the Ctl+Sal group (*), and no difference compared to Ctl+Sal group (a).” In my opinion, the authors could avoid indicating the absence of statistically significant differences and remove “a”.

Answer: Right. The sentence “Values significantly different (p<0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test compared to the Ctl+Sal group (*), and no difference compared to Ctl+Sal group (a).” (lines 309-311) has been updated to “Values significantly different (p<0.05) by one-way ANOVA followed by Student–Newman–Keuls test compared to the Ctl+Sal group (*), and no difference compared to Ctl+Sal group.” (lines 340-342) and the letter “a” was removed.

4) Figure 3 (legend): the authors should describe the figure more clearly.

Answer: Right. The sentence figure legend 3 “Fig. 3. Interaction of the FOR811A compound, a ruthenium oxide donor metallodrug with anti-asthmatic potential, on the Heme portion of the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) enzyme. Through the exploration of the drug-protein binding mechanisms by the molecular docking method, it was observed that FOR811A bound strongly to the distal portion of the Heme group of sGC, specifically in the residue Cys141 (a). When interacted with H-NOX, the FOR811A compound interacted with the hydrogen molecule through the cysteine at position 141 (Cys 141) of the 1.34 Å complex (b, c).” has been updated to “Fig. 3. Interaction of the FOR811A compound, a ruthenium nitric oxide donor metallocompound with anti-asthmatic potential, on the Heme portion of the soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) enzyme. Through the exploration of the potential drug-protein binding mechanisms by the molecular docking method, it was observed that FOR811A bound strongly to the distal portion of the Heme group of sGC, specifically interacting with the residue Cys141 (a). In this study with H-NOX, FOR811A was shown to interact with the thiol portion of the cysteine residue at position 141 (Cys 141) (b, c).”.

Sincerely,

The authors

Attachment

Submitted filename: R1 - PLOS ONE - Response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo

26 Feb 2021

Anti-asthmatic effect of nitric oxide metallo-donor FOR811A [cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)]3+(PF6)3] in the respiratory mechanics of Swiss mice

PONE-D-20-30462R1

Dear Dr. Stefanie Waller,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors responded adequately to the points previously highlighted. No further changes would seem necessary

Reviewer #2: In my opinion, the authors amended the text and answered to the reviewer questions appropriately. I have no further concerns.

The paper is now considered to be suitable for publication in Plos One

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo

3 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-30462R1

Anti-asthmatic effect of nitric oxide metallo-donor FOR811A [cis-[Ru(bpy)2(2-MIM)(NO)](PF6)3] in the respiratory mechanics of Swiss mice

Dear Dr. Waller:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Professor Fabio Luigi Massimo Ricciardolo

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Scheme of the integrated platform for data collection regarding pulmonary mechanics measurements.

    Through a carbogen cylinder (A), oxygenation was maintained at a ratio of 95%:5% (O2:CO2). An air purification unit (B) was attached to the equipment responsible for maintaining the heating and humidification of the air (C) and the depressurizer (D), mechanical fan for small animals (E) and ultrasonic nebulizer (F). Also, a reservoir containing bronchoconstrictor (G) and a bed with heating support (H) for maintaining the body at a temperature of 37°C were available.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: R1 - PLOS ONE - Response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES