Skip to main content
PLOS Pathogens logoLink to PLOS Pathogens
. 2021 Mar 2;17(3):e1009345. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009345

A Salmonella Typhi RNA thermosensor regulates virulence factors and innate immune evasion in response to host temperature

Susan M Brewer 1, Christian Twittenhoff 2, Jens Kortmann 3, Sky W Brubaker 1, Jared Honeycutt 1, Liliana Moura Massis 1, Trung H M Pham 1, Franz Narberhaus 2, Denise M Monack 1,‡,*
Editor: Leigh Knodler4
PMCID: PMC7954313  PMID: 33651854

Abstract

Sensing and responding to environmental signals is critical for bacterial pathogens to successfully infect and persist within hosts. Many bacterial pathogens sense temperature as an indication they have entered a new host and must alter their virulence factor expression to evade immune detection. Using secondary structure prediction, we identified an RNA thermosensor (RNAT) in the 5’ untranslated region (UTR) of tviA encoded by the typhoid fever-causing bacterium Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi). Importantly, tviA is a transcriptional regulator of the critical virulence factors Vi capsule, flagellin, and type III secretion system-1 expression. By introducing point mutations to alter the mRNA secondary structure, we demonstrate that the 5’ UTR of tviA contains a functional RNAT using in vitro expression, structure probing, and ribosome binding methods. Mutational inhibition of the RNAT in S. Typhi causes aberrant virulence factor expression, leading to enhanced innate immune responses during infection. In conclusion, we show that S. Typhi regulates virulence factor expression through an RNAT in the 5’ UTR of tviA. Our findings demonstrate that limiting inflammation through RNAT-dependent regulation in response to host body temperature is important for S. Typhi’s “stealthy” pathogenesis.

Author summary

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi) is a human-restricted bacterial pathogen that causes 11–21 million new cases of typhoid fever worldwide each year. During acute infection, S. Typhi evades immune detection and rapidly spreads systemically, which has earned it the nickname of a “stealth” pathogen. The transcriptional regulator TviA is unique to S. Typhi and critical for this stealthy phenotype because it represses the expression of major pathogen-associated molecular patterns and induces the important virulence factor Vi capsule, which enable S. Typhi to evade immune detection. We show that S. Typhi regulates virulence factor expression in response to host body temperature via an RNA thermosensor (RNAT) located in the 5’ untranslated region of tviA, which controls production of TviA protein in response to temperature fluctuations. Mutational perturbation of the tviA RNAT causes aberrant virulence factor expression in response to temperature and reveals that a functional RNAT is required for S. Typhi to evade innate immune detection and activation. Our work is the first to describe an RNAT in a critical virulence factor transcriptional regulator in S. Typhi and demonstrates the important role that temperature-sensing plays in S. Typhi pathogenesis.

Introduction

Microbes use environmental cues to modulate their expression profiles to adapt to new niches. Many bacterial pathogens sense temperature as an indication they have entered a new host [1]. At the human body temperature of 37°C, many pathogens upregulate key virulence factors to defend against the immune response and modify or downregulate expression of molecules that may alert the host to their presence. Some bacterial pathogens have evolved RNA thermosensors (RNATs) to rapidly modulate their virulence factor expression in response to temperature [2]. RNATs are typically found in the 5’ untranslated region (UTR) of bacterial genes and post-transcriptionally regulate their translation [2]. For example, at lower temperatures, the mRNA secondary structure obscures the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) region and/or the translation start codon (AUG), preventing ribosomes from binding and translating the downstream gene product (S1A Fig). As the temperature increases, the hydrogen bonds between the nucleotides melt, opening up the structure and enabling ribosome access and translation (S1A Fig) [2]. Using post-transcriptional RNAT-mediated thermoregulation enables bacterial pathogens to rapidly respond to a temperature increase by immediately translating critical transcription factors that impact pathogenesis. Although previous studies have identified RNATs in the 5’ UTR of transcription regulators that control the expression of critical virulence factors, the role of RNATs in Salmonella pathogenesis has been understudied [2]. Indeed, the impact of temperature on Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi (S. Typhi), the causative agent of typhoid fever, has not been extensively explored.

S. Typhi is a human-restricted bacterial pathogen that causes an estimated 11–21 million new cases of typhoid fever worldwide annually [3]. Symptoms of this enteric fever manifest as headache, abdominal pain, and high fever. Although infection occurs through the fecal-oral route by ingesting contaminated food or water, S. Typhi transiently occupies the gastrointestinal niche, causing minimal inflammation, before rapidly disseminating to systemic sites where it can persist chronically [4,5]. In stark contrast to the highly related pathogen S. Typhimurium, which induces intestinal inflammation, leading to a self-limited gastroenteritis, S. Typhi evades immune detection during acute infection and spreads systemically, earning it the nickname of a “stealth” pathogen [4,5]. Despite sharing approximately 89% of genes, and many common virulence factors, the pathologies of the diseases caused by S. Typhi and S. Typhimurium are strikingly different [6]. Studying the genetic differences between these highly related strains has provided insight into how these bacterial pathogens cause such disparate diseases.

S. Typhi encodes a virulence factor locus that is absent in S. Typhimurium called viaB, which consists of the genes to synthesize (tviBCDE) and export (vexABCDE) the virulence factor Vi capsule [7,8]. Vi capsule is an extracellular polysaccharide coating that protects S. Typhi from innate immune responses by preventing TLR4 activation, complement deposition, and neutrophil recruitment [912]. S. Typhi strains that lack Vi capsule are significantly attenuated, indicating the importance of this virulence factor in typhoid pathogenesis [13].

Expression of Vi capsule requires the transcriptional regulator tviA, another viaB locus gene, whose transcription is controlled by environmental osmolarity [14,15]. Under high salt conditions, such as those in the intestinal lumen, tviA transcription is suppressed, and Vi capsule is not expressed (S1B Fig) [1517]. Importantly, TviA also negatively regulates the expression of flagellin, type three secretion system (T3SS)-1, and chemotaxis genes, which are important for motility and invasion of host cells [15]. Thus, in the absence of TviA, these molecules are fully expressed, and S. Typhi has a motile, invasive phenotype. As S. Typhi invades intestinal epithelial cells, the osmolarity decreases and transcription of tviA is induced, leading to Vi capsule expression and repression of flagellin, T3SS-1, and chemotaxis genes (S1B Fig) [15,18]. Repression of flagellin and T3SS-1 is critical upon tissue invasion because these are major pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that activate innate immunity. TLR5 recognizes flagellin, resulting in proinflammatory cytokine and chemokine secretion [19,20]. Cytosolic flagellin and T3SS-1 are recognized by NAIP, which activates the NLRC4 inflammasome, releasing the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 and destroying S. Typhi’s replicative niche via pyroptotic cell death [2129]. Thus, in combination with Vi capsule expression, TviA-mediated suppression of flagellin and T3SS-1 is critical for S. Typhi to evade recognition by and activation of the innate immune system following tissue invasion. Since current vaccines target Vi antigen, it is crucial that we understand how this major virulence factor is regulated in S. Typhi [4]. In this study, we explore the mechanisms by which S. Typhi modulates the expression of major virulence factors in response to temperature. We demonstrate the presence and function of an RNAT in the 5’ UTR of tviA, which modulates virulence factor expression in S. Typhi and is required for evasion of host innate immune responses.

Results

Temperature alters expression of S. Typhi virulence factors

Since S. Typhi can be isolated from environmental reservoirs such as water, we hypothesized that S. Typhi may regulate important virulence factors, such as Vi capsule, in a temperature-dependent manner [30]. To test this, we cultured the common S. Typhi lab strain Ty2 at an “environmental” temperature of 23°C, followed by a 2 hour shift to the human host body temperature of 37°C and looked at Vi capsule expression via immunofluorescence. S. Typhi Vi capsule expression was minimal at 23°C (Fig 1A). In contrast, Vi capsule expression increased following a shift to 37°C (Fig 1A), suggesting temperature-dependent regulation of virulence factor expression. To quantify Vi capsule expression and determine how quickly this expression change occurs, we performed a shorter temperature shift experiment and measured Vi expression via flow cytometry (S2 Fig). A 30 minute exposure to 37°C led to a significant increase in Vi capsule expression in WT Ty2, which was dependent on tviA (Fig 1B and 1C). Since TviA regulates the expression of Vi capsule, we proposed that the mRNA expression of TviA may be regulated by temperature, explaining the increase in Vi capsule expression we observed. To test this idea, we measured tviA mRNA levels in WT and ΔtviA S. Typhi strains following a 30 minute shift to 37°C. Interestingly, tviA mRNA levels did not increase at 37°C (Fig 1D). These data demonstrate that S. Typhi rapidly changes Vi capsule expression at higher temperature. However, this change in Vi capsule expression is not regulated at the tviA transcript level.

Fig 1. Salmonella Typhi Vi capsule expression is elevated after shift from ambient to human body temperature.

Fig 1

A) Immunofluorescence microscopy images of wild-type (WT) or Vi capsule deficient (ΔtviA) S. Typhi Ty2 grown at 23°C (upper panels) or grown at 23°C and shifted to 37°C for 2 hours (lower panels). Bacteria were stained using Vi capsule-specific antibody (red) and DAPI counterstain (blue). Merged images show zoomed in insets of bacteria. Scale bar = 20 μm. B) Vi capsule expression measured by flow cytometry of wild-type (WT) or ΔtviA S. Typhi grown at 23°C or after a 30 minute shift to 37°C. C) Percentage of Vi+ WT or ΔtviA S. Typhi bacteria grown at 23°C or after a 30 minute shift to 37°C as measured by flow cytometry. D) Relative expression levels of tviA mRNA of WT and ΔtviA S. Typhi at ambient temperature (23°C) or following a shift to human body temperature (37°C) for 30 minutes. tviA mRNA levels normalized to 16S mRNA levels. ΔΔCt method used to determine relative expression compared to WT at 23°C. Data shown are representative of 3 (A and B) independent experiments or are the combined results of 3 (C) or 2 (D) independent experiments with triplicate samples for each condition. Symbol shape corresponds with datapoints from different independent experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SD. ND, not detected. NS, not significant. Significance calculated using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

The tviA 5’ UTR modulates translation in response to temperature

Several human pathogens utilize RNA thermosensors (RNATs) to post-transcriptionally regulate the translation of virulence transcription factors in response to host body temperature [3135]. Since TviA is essential for Vi capsule expression and we did not observe changes in tviA mRNA levels following a temperature shift to 37°C (Fig 1D), we hypothesized that an RNAT may be present in the 5’ UTR of tviA.

To investigate whether an RNAT may control S. Typhi’s temperature-dependent virulence factor expression, we used Mfold to predict the secondary structure of the 5’ UTR of tviA mRNA [36]. Analysis revealed that this leader region comprises a potential RNAT, in which the SD sequence (position 123 to 127 within the 5’ UTR) partially pairs with four consecutive uridines (fourU; position 89 to 92 within the 5’ UTR) (Fig 2A). The 5’ UTR is predicted to form a two stem-loop structure, with the 3’-most stem-loop harboring the promising fourU element. Moreover, this needle structure possesses destabilizing structural elements, such as an internal loop, a bulged adenine residue, and non-canonical base-pairings between the fourU element and the SD sequence. The predicted 5’-stem loop comprises a multi loop structure with two individual hairpins. These structural properties are consistent with those of previously described cis-acting RNATs, which have been shown to possess two hairpins with the 3’-most hairpin harboring the thermosensor element, bulged nucleotides or internal loops, and/or the fourU element participating in noncanonical base-pairing [31,32,35,3741]. Thus, these predicted structural properties as well as the observed thermoregulation of Vi capsule expression suggested that the tviA 5’ UTR harbors a cis-regulatory thermosensor.

Fig 2. The tviA 5’ UTR mediates temperature-dependent translation.

Fig 2

A) Secondary structure prediction of the tviA 5’ UTR (132 nt plus AUG codon; 135 nt total) using the Mfold program [36]. The start codon (AUG) is marked in gray. The Shine-Dalgarno (SD) and fourU RNA thermosensor (4U) sequences are indicated. B) Schematic of the RNA thermosensor-containing 5’ UTR and heat-stable β-galactosidase (bgaB) fusion construct under transcriptional control of the arabinose inducible PBAD promoter. C) Effect of temperature on bgaB translation from S. Typhi tviA and Yersinia lcrF 5’ UTRs. D) Effect of altering base-pairing of the fourU region on temperature-dependent translation. Comparison of translation efficiency at different temperatures using the S. Typhi wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT)-, the rep3 (T90,92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (REP)-, and the derep4 (T89,91G;C93G) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (DEREP)-bgaB fusion constructs. E) Relative expression levels of bgaB mRNA of the WT, REP, and DEREP tviA 5’ UTR-bgaB fusion constructs following 30 minute temperature shifts. bgaB mRNA level normalized to 16S rRNA level for each sample. Data shown are representative of 3 (C and D) or are the combined results of 2 (E) independent experiments with triplicate samples for each condition. Symbol shape corresponds with different independent experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SD. NS, not significant. Statistical significance determined using one-way (C and E) or two-way (D) ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

We wanted to test whether the tviA 5’ UTR structure controls tviA translation in response to fluctuating temperature. To do this, we generated a plasmid-based translational fusion of the tviA 5’ UTR and a heat-stable β-galactosidase (i.e., bgaB) under transcriptional control of the arabinose-inducible PBAD promoter (Fig 2B) [37,42]. By growing Escherichia coli DH5α containing this fusion construct at 25, 37, and 42°C and measuring reporter gene activity, we could determine if the putative tviA RNAT confers post-transcriptional regulation of β-galactosidase protein expression. We included the well-characterized lcrF fourU element from Yersinia pseudotuberculosis as a positive control and saw increasing β-galactosidase activity with increasing temperature, as expected (Fig 2C) [31]. The tviA 5’ UTR fusion construct also showed a positive correlation between β-galactosidase activity and temperature, with more than 3-fold or 7-fold induction of BgaB activity from 25°C to 37 or 42°C, respectively (Fig 2C). This temperature-dependent synthesis of BgaB supports the hypothesis that the tviA 5’ UTR contains an RNAT for control of virulence expression.

Point mutations impair tviA thermosensor functionality

Previous studies demonstrated that targeted point mutations disrupt the RNAT structure, causing aberrant expression in response to temperature [31,35,39,41]. Substitution of noncanonical U-G pairs to more stable C-G pairs with stronger bonding between the fourU motif and the SD region creates a stabilized secondary structure in the RNAT, which cannot melt open to enable translation even at elevated temperatures. Conversely, disrupting G-C interactions between the SD and fourU sequences destabilizes the RNAT’s overall structure, resulting in an open conformation and greater translation at low temperature [31,33,41]. Based on the proposed secondary structure, we designed point mutations predicted to either tighten or loosen the structure of the tviA thermosensor and introduced these mutations via site-directed mutagenesis (S3A and S3B Fig). The RNAT variants rep1 (T90C), rep2 (T92C), and rep3 (T90,92C; combination of rep1 and rep2) were predicted to repress the RNAT and prevent it from melting open with increasing temperature by increasing hydrogen bonds between the fourU element and the SD sequence. We also produced a derepressed variant (DEREP; T89,91G;C93G) predicted to weaken the fourU-SD interaction and enable a ribosome-accessible conformation at low temperature by eliminating two A-G and one stable C-G pairings. As described above, we fused the mutated tviA 5’ UTRs to bgaB in pBAD2 and measured β-galactosidase activity at 25, 37, and 42°C (Fig 2D) [42]. While repressive mutations rep1 and rep2 resulted in partial inhibition of bgaB expression (S3C Fig), we observed full repression for the rep3 variant (hereafter referred to as REP) even at 37 and 42°C (Fig 2D). In contrast, the DEREP variant retained its temperature-responsiveness (Fig 2D). Furthermore, BgaB activity levels from the DEREP variant at 37 and 42°C were higher than the wild-type (WT) tviA 5’ UTR fusion construct, indicating a less stable RNAT structure. Importantly, neither the observed temperature-dependent increase in β-galactosidase activity nor the differences in activity between the tviA 5’ UTR variants could be explained by bgaB transcript levels (Fig 2E). Although WT and DEREP showed higher bgaB transcript levels at 42°C compared to 25 and 37°C, this increase was not significant and this pattern was also seen with the REP variant, which showed negligible corresponding β-galactosidase activity levels at this temperature (Fig 2D and 2E). Additionally, the WT and DEREP variants did not show significant increases in bgaB transcript levels at 37°C compared to 25°C, even though we observed significantly more β-galactosidase activity at 37°C with these variants (Fig 2D and 2E). These results demonstrate that the secondary structure surrounding the SD region determines ribosome accessibility and that the thermodynamic interaction of the SD and fourU region enables precise temperature-dependent tviA translation.

The tviA 5’ UTR harbors a temperature-labile RNA structure

We next aimed to validate the proposed secondary structure of the tviA 5‘ UTR (Fig 2A) and to monitor its temperature-dependent unfolding using enzymatic structure probing of in vitro-transcribed, radiolabeled RNA. The properties of RNases T1 and T2, which cleave 3’ of unpaired guanines and predominantly unpaired adenines, respectively, make them ideal for examining the melting behavior of the purine-rich SD sequence within RNAT structures [41,43,44]. Thus, we used these RNases to probe the tviA 5’ UTR at 25, 37, and 42°C. Resolution of the cleavage products on an 8% polyacrylamide gel enabled us to assess temperature-dependent changes to the secondary structure conformation (Fig 3A).

Fig 3. The tviA 5’ UTR fourU RNA thermosensor facilitates temperature-dependent access to the SD sequence.

Fig 3

A) 5’ end-labeled in vitro transcribed RNA containing the wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT), the rep3 (T90,92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (REP), or the derep4 (T89,91G;C93G) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (DEREP) was enzymatically probed with RNases T1 (cuts 3’ of single-stranded guanines) and T2 (cuts 3’ of single-stranded nucleotides with preference order: A > C > U > G) at 25, 37, and 42°C. Fragmented RNA was separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel, a portion of which is shown here. AL: alkaline ladder. LT1: RNase T1 cleavage in sequence buffer at 37°C. C: RNA treated with water instead of RNase at 42°C. B) Secondary structure of the tviA 5’ UTR predicted by Mfold [36]. Cleavage sites of RNase T1 and T2, the fourU RNA thermosensor (4U), the Shine-Dalgarno (SD) sequence, and the start codon (AUG) are indicated. C) Secondary structure of the tviA 5’ UTR predicted by Mfold using cleavage information as constraints for folding. Secondary structures were visualized using VARNA applet 3.93 [45]. Data shown in A are representative of 4 independent experiments. See also S4 Fig.

For many residues, the cleavage pattern fit the predicted secondary structure, with nucleotides susceptible to RNase T1 and T2 cleavage at 25°C; however, some nucleotides that were predicted to be unpaired more likely adopted a double-stranded conformation based on their inability to be cleaved at 25°C (Figs 3A, 3B, and full gel in S4A). While only faint bands were visible at 25°C, the majority of the SD sequence was strongly prone to RNase T1 or T2 cleavage at 37 and 42°C, as indicated by increased band intensity (GGAG124-127; Figs 3A, S4A red highlight, S4B and S4C). This cleavage pattern indicates melting of the ribosome-binding region. Moreover, additional nucleotides (G101, AG117-118; S4A Fig brown highlight) were exclusively sensitive to enzymatic cleavage at 37 and 42°C, suggesting that the whole stem II is thermo-labile (Fig 3B). Apart from the WT tviA 5’ UTR, we also probed the stabilized REP variant. Repressive mutations only affected the structure of stem loop II, resulting in a more stable structure (Figs 3A, 3B, S3A, S3B and S4A). Banding patterns that correspond to an open SD sequence were absent from RNA containing the repressive mutations (Figs 3A and S4A). These data indicate that the RNA structure is clamped in its “low temperature” conformation even at the elevated temperatures of 37 or 42°C. In contrast, the DEREP point mutations likely loosen the RNAT’s structure, as the nucleotides of the SD region were sensitive to RNase T1/T2 cleavage at 25°C (Figs 3A and S4A). Furthermore, new band signals were detected at all three temperatures, corresponding to the anti-SD region (nucleotides 89 to 93; S4A Fig blue highlight) and include the mutated guanine residues.

Since the cleavage pattern of RNase T1/T2 (Figs 3A and S4A) deviated from the predicted secondary structure (Fig 3B), we used the information from enzymatic structure probing as hard constraints to guide folding of the tviA 5’ UTR (Fig 3C and S1 Table). The guided structure prediction still consists of two hairpins, with the 3’-most harboring the SD sequence partially paired to the fourU motif. In contrast to the calculated minimal free energy structure (Fig 3B), the interior loop of hairpin II is enlarged (Fig 3C). We observed more drastic structural alterations within hairpin I with a multiloop comprising three individual hairpins. Taken together, the results clearly point to a temperature-sensitive structure within the tviA 5’ UTR, which enhances accessibility to the ribosome binding site under virulence-relevant conditions. Notably, point mutations within the predicted binding sites manipulate the melting behavior of the RNAT.

Melting of the tviA RNA thermosensor favors ribosome binding at 37°C

The zipper-like melting process of RNATs enables increased ribosome-binding to the SD sequence at elevated temperatures [38]. To address whether the tviA RNAT allows temperature-dependent ribosome-binding, we performed toeprinting experiments [46]. We generated in vitro transcribed RNA fragments consisting of the tviA RNAT as well as 60 nucleotides of the coding region and performed reverse transcription in the presence or absence of the 30S ribosomal subunit at 25, 37, and 42°C. After primer extension, we separated the reverse transcription products on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. If ribosomes do not bind the RNA fragment, polymerase extension will occur unimpeded, resulting in a full-length reverse transcription product (Fig 4A, top of gel). However, ribosomes that bind the RNA fragment prevent polymerase extension, generating shorter products and a “toeprint.” We observed toeprinting signals at position +15 to +17 relative to the translation start codon (AUG) only in the presence of ribosomal subunits (Fig 4A). Toeprint signal intensity also increased with increasing temperature (Fig 4A, 4B and 4C), indicating improved ribosomal binding at higher temperatures. We did not detect a toeprinting signal with the REP variant of the tviA thermometer (Fig 4A), which is consistent with the absence of RNA melting in vitro and translation initiation in vivo. Moreover, a faint signal around the SD sequence was observed similar to previously described repressed RNAT structures [31,44,47,48]. This pattern may be explained by the stabilized secondary structure of the repressed variant causing the reverse transcriptase to prematurely stop or drop off, generating a toeprint signal despite a lack of ribosome binding [49]. There was no difference in band signal intensity between the WT and DEREP RNATs (Fig 4A). Nevertheless, these results demonstrate ribosomal subunit binding in response to elevated temperature. Furthermore, this demonstrates that increased temperature is sufficient for ribosomal binding within the RNAT independent of any additional bacterial factors.

Fig 4. Temperature-dependent binding of ribosomes to the tviA 5’ UTR.

Fig 4

A) Toeprint analysis was performed with in vitro transcribed RNA containing the wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT), the rep3 (T90,92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (REP), or the derep4 (T89,91;C93G) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (DEREP) at 25, 37, and 42°C, as described in Materials and Methods. TGCA indicates the corresponding DNA sequencing reactions, and the positions of the SD sequence and the ATG start codon are indicated. Reverse transcription reactions were performed without (-) and with (+) the 30S ribosomal subunit. The signals corresponding to the full-length transcript and the toeprint corresponding to the position +15 to +17 from the start codon are indicated. B and C) For toeprint positions +15, +16, and +17, the raw band intensity (B) and normalized band intensity (C) was calculated at each temperature tested for the WT 5’ UTR. For normalization, the band intensity of each position at each temperature was normalized to the average band intensity of that position at 25°C. Data shown are representative of 3 independent experiments. Statistical significance determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. * p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

The tviA RNAT regulates S. Typhi virulence factor expression in response to temperature

To determine the biological relevance of the tviA RNAT in its native setting, we introduced the REP (tviA-REP) and DEREP (tviA-DEREP) mutations into the 5’ UTR of tviA in S. Typhi. As we saw previously (Fig 1), Vi capsule expression positively correlated with increasing temperature in WT Ty2 S. Typhi, and, intriguingly, WT S. Typhi expressed even more Vi capsule at 42°C than at 37°C (Fig 5A). RNAT repressing mutations abrogated the temperature-dependent Vi capsule expression phenotype in the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant, resulting in Vi capsule production levels similar to the levels in a S. Typhi ΔtviA mutant (Fig 5A). In contrast, the S. Typhi tviA-DEREP mutant preserved temperature-dependent increases in Vi capsule expression and showed significantly higher levels of Vi capsule at both 23°C and 37°C compared to WT (Fig 5A). Importantly, the temperature-dependent increases in Vi production in WT or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi were not due to temperature-dependent increases in tviA mRNA transcript levels (Fig 5B). We observed lower levels of tviA mRNA in the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant at all temperatures tested. This is most likely explained by transcript instability due to a lack of ribosome binding [37]. Together, these data suggest that the 5’ UTR of tviA in S. Typhi contains a functional RNAT that regulates Vi capsule expression in a temperature-dependent manner.

Fig 5. The tviA 5’ UTR fourU RNA thermosensor regulates virulence factor expression in a temperature-dependent manner.

Fig 5

A) Quantitation of Vi capsule expression by flow cytometry of wild-type (WT), ΔtviA, tviA-REP (T90,92C), or tviA-DEREP (T89,91G;C93G) S. Typhi at ambient temperature (23°C) or following a shift to human body temperature (37°C) or fever-like temperature (42°C) for 30 minutes. B) Relative expression levels of tviA mRNA of WT, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at ambient temperature (23°C) or following a shift to human body temperature (37°C) or fever-like temperature (42°C) for 30 minutes. tviA mRNA levels normalized to 16S rRNA levels for each sample. C) Representative images of WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi grown on motility assay plates (0.3% agar) containing 0 mM or 150 mM NaCl at 37°C for 24 hours. D) Measurement of halo diameter (in cm) of WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi grown on motility assay plates as described in 5C. E) Western blot for flagellin from whole cell lysates of WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi grown for 24 hours statically under the following conditions: low salt media (5 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, low salt media at 37°C, high salt media (300 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, or high salt media at 37°C. F) Quantitation of flagellin from Western blots. Flagellin band intensities were normalized to total protein band intensities for each sample. These values were then further normalized against the “WT low salt 23°C” sample for the purposes of plotting the data. The quantitation results from two independent Western blots are shown. Data shown are combined from 2 (A, B, and F) or 3 (D) independent experiments with triplicate samples for each condition or representative of 2 (E) or 3 (C) independent experiments. Symbol shape corresponds with different independent experiments. Data are represented as mean ± SD. ND, not detected. NS, not significant. Significance calculated using one-way (B and D) or two-way (A) ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, **** p < 0.0001.

Since TviA suppresses expression of flagellin, we wanted to elucidate the role of the tviA RNAT in modulating S. Typhi motility [15]. We inoculated low agar concentration plates containing salt levels that induce (0 mM NaCl) or suppress (150 mM NaCl) tviA transcription with S. Typhi strains, grew them at 37°C, and measured halo size as an indicator of motility (Fig 5C and 5D). In low salt conditions, the halo size produced by WT S. Typhi was significantly smaller than the halo produced in high salt conditions, indicating production of TviA and suppression of flagellin, as expected. In addition, the halo sizes produced by the S. Typhi ΔfliC mutant were small, regardless of salt concentration, consistent with the presence of flagellin being required for motility. In contrast, the halo sizes produced by the S. Typhi ΔtviA mutant were large, indicating that the inability to suppress flagellin expression leads to motility regardless of salt concentration (Fig 5C and 5D). Importantly, the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant produced large halos when grown under both salt concentrations, consistent with the absence of TviA in this S. Typhi strain. In contrast, the S. Typhi tviA-DEREP mutant produced halos that were smaller than the WT S. Typhi strain under low salt conditions. Collectively, our results indicate that a functional tviA RNAT is important for S. Typhi motility via modulation of flagellin.

To further explore the role of the tviA RNAT in modulating flagellin, we investigated flagellin production under growth conditions that combined the effects of both temperature and osmolarity. We probed for flagellin via Western blot using whole cell lysates from S. Typhi strains grown statically under the following conditions: low salt media (5 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, low salt media at 37°C, high salt media (300 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, or high salt media at 37°C. As expected, the ΔfliC mutant of S. Typhi did not produce flagellin under any of the tested conditions (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B). WT S. Typhi produced low levels of flagellin in low salt media at 37°C, which was expected since low salt induces tviA transcription and high temperature melts open the tviA RNAT and allows for maximal translation, leading to high levels of TviA and maximal flagellin suppression (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B). In contrast, WT S. Typhi exhibited the highest levels of flagellin production in high salt media at 23°C (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B). This result was also expected, since these conditions should maximally suppress TviA production, enabling flagellin expression. The remaining two conditions resulted in intermediate levels of flagellin production in WT S. Typhi (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B). This was expected since the low salt low temperature condition should allow for tviA transcription but not translation, and the high salt high temperature condition should allow for translation from any tviA mRNA present but inhibit synthesis of additional transcripts. Similar to WT S. Typhi, the tviA-DEREP mutant produced the lowest levels of flagellin in low salt media at 37°C and the highest levels of flagellin in high salt media at 23°C (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B). These results were expected, since the tviA-DEREP S. Typhi mutant still contains a functional tviA RNAT. It appeared that the tviA-DEREP mutant may have slightly lower levels of flagellin production under conditions of low salt and high temperature compared to WT S. Typhi (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B; compare patterned bars in Figs 5F and S5B). This result would fit with the derepressing mutations opening up the tviA RNAT structure more than in WT S. Typhi, enabling greater production of TviA and more suppression of flagellin expression. However, we cannot conclude based on these data whether the observed difference is significant. Importantly, the tviA-REP mutant produced more flagellin than WT S. Typhi when grown in low salt media at 37°C, and the amount of flagellin produced was comparable to the level produced by the ΔtviA mutant under these conditions (Figs 5E, 5F, S5A and S5B; compare patterned bars in Figs 5F and S5B). This is consistent with the repressing mutations preventing TviA production, leading to an inability to suppress flagellin. Across the tested conditions, both the ΔtviA and tviA-REP mutants appeared to have greater flagellin production than WT S. Typhi, which is consistent with an absence of TviA production. However, we observed some differences in the level of flagellin production in these mutants between the tested conditions. It is possible that another regulatory element involved in flagellin expression may be sensitive to either osmolarity and/or temperature and modulate flagellin expression in the absence of TviA. However, our results suggest that TviA plays a dominant role in modulating flagellin expression. Additionally, our results support the conclusion that a functional tviA RNAT is critical for regulating flagellin expression in response to human host body temperature.

S. Typhi evasion of innate immune signaling in intestinal epithelial cells requires the tviA RNAT

Given that flagellin is a major PAMP that is recognized by the human innate immune system and its expression is modulated by TviA, we wanted to determine the role the tviA RNAT plays in innate immune responses [15]. Before S. Typhi establishes a systemic infection, it must first translocate the intestinal epithelial cell (IEC) barrier. IECs serve as the first line of defense between the gut lumen and systemic tissues, and they basolaterally express TLRs to detect the presence of invasive pathogens [19,50,51]. Previous work has demonstrated that S. Typhi uses TviA to modulate its virulence factor expression to evade detection by TLRs and prevent intestinal inflammation in order to establish successful systemic infection [9,11,18,52]. Thus, we hypothesized that a functional tviA RNAT would be critically important for evasion of TLR-dependent signaling in IECs. To test this, we infected the human colonic epithelial cell line HT-29 with S. Typhi mutants grown under non-invasive conditions (i.e., low salt) and measured secretion of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8 as an indication of TLR-dependent signaling at 6 and 18 hours post-infection (p.i.) (Fig 6A and 6B). As expected, the S. Typhi ΔtviA mutant strain induced significantly higher levels of IL-8 secretion at both 6 and 18 hours p.i. compared to WT S. Typhi. (Fig 6A and 6B). Importantly, the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant induced higher levels of IL-8 secretion at 6 and 18 hours p.i. compared to WT S. Typhi, similar to the TviA-deficient S. Typhi strain (Fig 6A and 6B). To test whether the increased levels of cytokine secretion induced by the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant strain were dependent on flagellin, we deleted the fliC gene in this strain. Indeed, the S. Typhi tviA-REP ΔfliC mutant strain induced significantly lower levels of IL-8 secretion at 6 and 18 hours p.i. (Fig 6A and 6B) compared to the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant strain, demonstrating that the inability of the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant to suppress flagellin expression leads to greater innate immune signaling. We also observed that WT and the tviA-DEREP S. Typhi strains induced secretion of IL-8 at levels that were the same as the S. Typhi ΔfliC mutant (Fig 6A and 6B). This was expected since low salt growth conditions were used, which should induce maximal suppression of flagellin expression in both WT and tviA-DEREP S. Typhi. Taken together, our results indicate that a functional tviA RNAT is important for S. Typhi to modulate flagellin expression in order to evade innate immune signaling upon infection of IECs.

Fig 6. The tviA 5’ UTR fourU RNA thermosensor is required for S. Typhi evasion of innate immune signaling in human intestinal epithelial cells.

Fig 6

A and B) TLR-dependent signaling as measured by IL-8 secretion from the human intestinal epithelial cell line HT-29 following infection for 6 (A) or 18 (B) hours with non-invasive WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, tviA-REP ΔfliC, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at MOI = 25 or left uninfected. Data shown are representative of 2 (B) or 3 (A) independent experiments with triplicate samples for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Significance calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001.

tviA RNAT regulation of virulence factors is critical for evasion of inflammasome activation

Cytosolic flagellin is a potent activator of the NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome, leading to caspase-1 activation and cleavage, pyroptotic cell death, and release of the pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18 [2123,26,29]. Previous work has shown that TviA is important for reducing flagellin-mediated inflammasome activation by S. Typhi [27]. Since the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant cannot suppress flagellin expression, we hypothesized that infection with this strain would lead to greater inflammasome activation compared to WT S. Typhi. To test this, we infected LPS-primed human macrophage-like THP1 cells with S. Typhi mutants and assayed for pyroptotic cell death with lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release and IL-1β release at 2 hours post-infection as well as cell death kinetics using SYTOX Green staining over 10 hours of infection (Fig 7A, 7B and 7C). As predicted, the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant induced significantly higher levels of macrophage death (Fig 7A and 7C) and IL-1β release (Fig 7B) compared to WT S. Typhi. In addition, the tviA-REP mutant and the TviA-deficient S. Typhi strains induced similar increases in the levels of cell death and IL-1β release compared to WT S. Typhi (Fig 7A, 7B and 7C), consistent with the role of the tviA RNAT controlling expression of TviA-regulated genes, such as flagellin. To test whether the increased inflammasome activation in macrophages infected with the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant was dependent on flagellin, we infected macrophages with the S. Typhi tviA-REP ΔfliC mutant strain. The levels of macrophage death (Fig 7A and 7C) and IL-1β release (Fig 7B) from macrophages infected with the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant deficient for flagellin were the same as the very low levels that were induced by the WT S. Typhi strain (Fig 7A, 7B and 7C). Although macrophages infected with WT and tviA-DEREP S. Typhi strains induced similar levels of macrophage death, the S. Typhi tviA-DEREP mutant strain caused significantly less IL-1β release (Fig 7B), suggesting the derepressed tviA RNAT enables S. Typhi to evade inflammasome activation to a greater extent than the wild-type RNAT. Together, these data suggest that a functional tviA RNAT is critical for S. Typhi to suppress flagellin expression upon entering the host cell, preventing inflammasome activation and preserving S. Typhi’s replicative niche.

Fig 7. The tviA 5’ UTR fourU RNA thermosensor enables S. Typhi to evade inflammasome activation during infection of human macrophages.

Fig 7

A) Pyroptotic cell death as measured by lactate dehydrogenase release from the human macrophage-like cell line THP1 primed overnight with 100 ng/ml LPS and following infection for 2 hours with WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, tviA-REP ΔfliC, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at MOI = 10 or left uninfected. B) Corresponding release of IL-1β to infection described in 7A. C) Kinetics of THP1 cell death as measured by SYTOX Green positive staining on an IncuCyte S3 after overnight priming with 100 ng/ml LPS and infection with WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, tviA-REP ΔfliC, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at MOI = 10 or left uninfected. Symbols indicate statistical comparison of ΔtviA or tviA-REP to WT at each time point. D and E) Pyroptotic cell death as measured by lactate dehydrogenase release from primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) from two different donors (Donor 1 D and Donor 2 E) primed overnight with 100 ng/ml LPS and following infection for 2 or 4 hours with WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, tviA-REP ΔfliC, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at MOI = 10 or left uninfected. F and G) Corresponding release of IL-1β to 2 hour post-infection time point described in 7D-E. H) Kinetics of hMDM cell death as measured by SYTOX Green positive staining on an IncuCyte S3 after overnight priming with 100 ng/ml LPS and infection with WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, tviA-REP ΔfliC, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at MOI = 10 or left uninfected. Asterisks and symbols indicate statistical comparison of ΔtviA or tviA-REP to WT at each time point. I) Western blot of caspase-1 (CASP1), IL-1β, and cleaved N-terminal gasdermin D (NT-GSDMD) in cell lysate plus supernatant of hMDM cells primed overnight with 100 ng/ml LPS and following infection for 2 hours with WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, tviA-REP ΔfliC, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi at MOI = 25 or left uninfected. Data shown are pooled from 2 (A, B, and C) independent experiments, are individual experiments with hMDMs from two different primary human blood donors (D, E, F, and G), or representative of 2 (H and I) independent experiments performed with hMDMs derived from two different primary human blood donors. Triplicate samples for each condition were used in the experiments in A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H. Data are represented as mean ± SD. Significance calculated using one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, **** p < 0.0001. In C and H, † indicates *** significance and ‡ indicates **** significance.

To understand better the role of the tviA RNAT in human infection, we infected primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) from two different donors with S. Typhi mutants and assessed inflammasome activation. S. Typhi ΔtviA and tviA-REP mutant strains caused significantly higher levels of cell death (LDH release and SYTOX Green staining) and IL-1β release in hMDMs than WT S. Typhi, and this was due to excessive flagellin expression, since deletion of fliC from the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant strain reduced macrophage death and IL-1β levels to those of WT-infected hMDMs (Fig 7D, 7E, 7F, 7G and 7H). Additionally, the S. Typhi ΔtviA and tviA-REP mutant strains induced higher levels of caspase-1, IL-1β, and gasdermin D cleavage as assessed by Western blot compared to the WT S. Typhi strain, indicating greater inflammasome activation upon infection with these mutants (Figs 7I and S6). This increase in inflammasome activation is most likely due to detection of flagellin by the NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome, since the S. Typhi tviA-REP ΔfliC mutant induced less caspase-1, IL-1β, and gasdermin D cleavage than the S. Typhi tviA-REP mutant. These results suggest that the tviA RNAT is critical for evasion of inflammasome activation during infection of primary human cells.

Conservation of the fourU RNAT in Vi capsule-producing, enteric fever-causing human pathogens

Other Salmonella enterica serovars have acquired the viaB locus and express Vi capsule. These include the human-specific pathogen S. Paratyphi C, which also causes enteric fever, and some isolates of S. Dublin, which causes an enteric fever-like disease in humans with high fever and bacteremia but little gastrointestinal disease [5355]. Interestingly, Vi capsule expression is not constrained to Salmonella spp. Both the opportunistic human pathogens Citrobacter freundii and Bordetella petrii as well as soil bacteria in the genus Achromobacter have homologs of viaB genes and produce Vi capsule [56]. Unlike Vi capsule-producing Salmonella spp., little is known about regulation of capsule expression in B. petrii and Achromobacter spp., but the genomes of these organisms do not contain a tviA homolog [56]. Although C. freundii regulates its Vi capsule expression via an insertion sequence 1-like element that inserts into a recombinational hotspot in the viaB locus, it does have a tviA homolog called vipR [57]. Alignment of the tviA 5’ UTRs from Salmonella spp. as well as the C. freundii vipR 5’ UTR sequence revealed conservation of the fourU RNAT motif within all the tviA sequences, whereas C. freundii vipR lacks the fourU RNAT motif (S7 Fig). Interestingly, the S. Paratyphi C and S. Dublin tviA 5’ UTR sequences lack the bulging adenine immediately 5’ to the SD region in the S. Typhi tviA 5’ UTR, which may stabilize the tviA 5’ UTR structure, requiring higher temperatures to melt the RNAT and enable translation in these serovars (Figs 2A and S7). However, without experimentally testing the S. Paratyphi C and S. Dublin tviA 5’ UTRs against the S. Typhi tviA 5’ UTR, the effect of the bulging adenine on RNAT functionality cannot be definitively concluded. Additionally, although it is possible that the vipR 5’ UTR still functions as an RNAT despite the lack of the fourU motif, the results of this alignment suggest that regulation of virulence factor expression in response to temperature is a key aspect of Salmonella spp. that express Vi capsule and cause enteric fever in humans.

Discussion

Our results demonstrate that S. Typhi modulates virulence factor expression through an RNAT-mediated temperature sensing mechanism. At the human core body temperature of 37°C, S. Typhi synthesizes more Vi capsule than at lower temperatures. Simultaneously, S. Typhi suppresses flagellin expression at 37°C. This coordinated regulation of virulence factor expression in response to temperature is controlled by the transcriptional regulator TviA. Our work shows that one mechanism dictating temperature-dependent control of virulence factor expression is mediated by an RNAT in the 5’ UTR of tviA that exerts post-transcriptional control of TviA protein production. Using in vitro methods and point mutations in the tviA 5’ UTR that either stabilize or destabilize the RNAT structure, we showed that the RNAT melts open at higher temperatures to enable ribosome access to the SD region and subsequent translation of tviA. These same point mutations regulated temperature-dependent virulence factor expression in S. Typhi Ty2 and impacted innate immune responses during in vitro infection. Our results are consistent with previous studies demonstrating that TviA-mediated regulation of flagellin is important for extracellular S. Typhi to evade TLR5 stimulation of IECs and intracellular S. Typhi to evade NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome activation in macrophages [27]. Thus, tviA RNAT-mediated regulation of virulence factor expression enables S. Typhi to rapidly alter its protein expression profile in response to temperature, allowing it to evade detection by the host innate immune response.

Previous work has demonstrated the importance of environmental osmolarity in TviA production [15]. Our work suggests regulation of TviA production integrates multiple environmental stimuli and involves at least two checkpoints. Osmolarity serves as the initial checkpoint, dictating whether or not tviA is transcribed, and temperature serves as the second checkpoint, post-transcriptionally controlling tviA translation (Fig 8). This fine-tuning suggests that S. Typhi has evolved to precisely coordinate its protein expression profile for distinct tissue locations during infection of the human host. Although S. Typhi suddenly experiences an increase in temperature upon ingestion, the high osmolarity of the intestinal lumen prevents transcriptional induction of tviA. Upon trafficking into the intestinal epithelium and establishing intracellular infection, S. Typhi experiences both low salt and high temperature conditions, permitting TviA synthesis. These transcriptional and translational checkpoints ensure that TviA production, and expression of the virulence factors it subsequently modulates, occurs at the optimal spatiotemporal moment during establishment of infection in a new host. Additionally, this two-checkpoint system could benefit S. Typhi outside of the human host. In the external environment, S. Typhi may experience low osmolarity conditions and induce tviA transcription, but the ambient temperature may not be permissive for translation to occur. This could prevent S. Typhi from expending precious energetic resources modulating virulence factor expression in a context where it serves no fitness benefit.

Fig 8. Production of TviA is a two-checkpoint system.

Fig 8

Although EnvZ/OmpR induce tviA transcription under low osmolarity conditions, production of the TviA protein only occurs in low salt environments with high temperature due to thermoregulation of tviA translation by the fourU RNAT. This fine-tuning of TviA expression enables S. Typhi to precisely regulate virulence factor expression (i.e., Vi capsule, flagellin, T3SS-1) for optimal evasion of host innate immune responses.

Typhoid fever derives its name from the characteristic high fever patients exhibit upon acute infection with S. Typhi [4,5]. Fever is an ancient, common innate immune response that helps the host defend against infection by accelerating immune functions and restricting pathogen growth [58,59]. The titratability of Vi capsule expression in response to increasing temperature—and in particular to the high temperature of 42°C—suggests that instead of being blunted by fever, S. Typhi may exploit this host response to further modulate virulence factor expression to evade innate immune detection. Unlike S. Typhimurium, which not only causes high levels of intestinal inflammation but thrives on it, S. Typhi is frequently described as a “stealth” pathogen because of its ability to induce little intestinal inflammation by evading immune detection, enabling it to spread systemically in the host [5]. Utilization of an RNAT to induce Vi capsule and suppress PAMP expression suggests that S. Typhi has evolved to take advantage of the fever response it induces upon systemic infection to further subvert detection and persist within the host.

RNATs have been identified in several critical human bacterial pathogens [2]. Interestingly, many of the characterized RNATs occur in the 5’ UTR upstream of genes encoding transcriptional regulators. These include prfA in Listeria monocytogenes, toxT in Vibrio cholerae, lcrF in Yersinia pseudotuberculosis, and rhlR and ptxS in Pseudomonas aeruginosa [3135]. Our work is the first to identify an RNAT in a critical virulence factor transcriptional regulator in the human-specific pathogen S. Typhi. The evolution of RNAT-mediated post-transcriptional control of transcription factor expression across these bacterial pathogens suggests that this temperature-response mechanism is a rapid and efficient method to adapt to the host environment. Additionally, these transcriptional regulators control the expression of major virulence factors for each of these pathogens. Thus, RNATs specifically enable quick and efficient modulation of virulence factor expression, allowing bacterial pathogens to rapidly subvert and defend against host immune responses. It is striking that a few base pair alterations can completely disrupt the RNAT structure and have significant downstream effects on bacterial protein expression and subsequent pathogenesis. Further study is warranted to gain a deeper understanding of the role of RNATs in bacterial physiology and the interface with the host immune response. Greater knowledge of the role of RNATs in bacterial pathogenesis may reveal novel strategies to target these structures for therapeutic treatment.

Materials and methods

Cell lines and primary cell cultures

HT-29 cells (a kind gift from Dr. Jan Carette, Stanford University) were maintained in DMEM medium supplemented with L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific #11995073) and 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and split every two days or as needed. For infection experiments, HT-29 cells were seeded at 5x104 cells per well in 96-well plates. 24 hours later, the media was removed and replaced with DMEM supplemented with L-glutamine without FBS in order to serum-starve the cells for 24 hours prior to infection.

THP-1 cells were maintained in RPMI medium supplemented with L-glutamine (Thermo Fisher Scientific #11875119) and 10% heat-inactivated FBS and split every two days or as needed. To differentiate to macrophages for inflammasome activation experiments, THP-1 cells were seeded at 5x104 cells per well in 96-well plates in the presence of 100 nM PMA (Invivogen #tlrl-pma). 24 hours later, the media was removed, each well was washed once with RPMI, and the media was replaced with RPMI supplemented with L-glutamine and 10% FBS. The cells were used for infections after 3 days of differentiation. Prior to infection, the differentiated THP-1 cells were primed for 18–24 hours with 100 ng/ml LPS (Invivogen #tlrl-3pelps).

Primary human monocyte-derived macrophages were derived from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) isolated from room temperature LRS chambers of de-identified same-day blood draws purchased through the Stanford Blood Center. Blood was flushed from the LRS chamber using room temperature 1x phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4. The blood-PBS solution was carefully overlayed onto room temperature Ficoll Paque Plus (Fisher Scientific #45-001-749) and then centrifuged at 900 xg for 30 minutes at room temperature in a swing bucket centrifuge with no brakes. Following centrifugation, the buffy coat containing PBMCs was harvested, transferred to new 50 ml conicals, and the volume was brought up to 50 ml with room temperature PBS. This mixture was then centrifuged at 250 xg for 10 min at room temperature in a swing bucket centrifuge with half brake. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was aspirated off and the cells were resuspended in 50 ml room temperature PBS to wash, followed by centrifugation at 250 xg for 10 minutes with high brake. This wash step was repeated until the supernatant was clear, indicating an absence of platelets. Following washes, the PBMCs were resuspended in serum-free RPMI and viable cells were counted using 0.2% Trypan blue staining and a hemacytometer. 2x108 PBMCs were plated in non-tissue culture 15 cm Petri dishes and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 3 hours to allow cells to adhere. After 3 hours, the media was aspirated, and the plates were washed 3 times with room temperature PBS. The media was then replaced with RPMI+10% FBS+30 ng/ml human M-CSF (hM-CSF; PeproTech #300-25-10). Two days after isolation, media was removed, the cells were washed twice with room temperature PBS, and fresh RPMI+10% FBS+30 ng/ml hM-CSF was added. At six days post-isolation, the differentiated macrophages were harvested and plated for infection experiments. The media was removed and the cells were washed once with room temperature PBS. Ice-cold PBS was then added to each dish of cells and the dishes were incubated on ice for 20 minutes. Cells were lifted by gently scraping. The cell suspension was then centrifuged at 250 xg at 4°C for 20 minutes and the supernatant was aspirated. The cell pellets were resuspended in RPMI+10% FBS and counted using a Bio-Rad TC20 cell counter. Human monocyte-derived macrophages (hMDMs) were plated at the following densities for infection experiments in RPMI+10% FBS+30 ng/ml hM-CSF: 5x104 cells per well in 96-well plates (LDH, IL-1β ELISA, and IncuCyte) and 2x106 cells per well in 6-well plates (Western blot). Prior to infection, the hMDMs were primed for 18–24 hours with 100 ng/ml LPS.

Bacterial cultures

Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in S2 Table. E. coli were grown in Luria Bertani (LB) medium (10 g/L tryptone+5 g/L yeast extract+10 g/L NaCl) at indicated temperatures. If required, antibiotics were added to the media at the following final concentrations: ampicillin or carbenicillin, 100 μg/ml. For the induction of the PBAD promoter, the medium was supplemented with L-arabinose to a final concentration of 0.01% (w/v).

S. Typhi strains were routinely cultured in LB medium without antibiotic selection. Prior to each experiment, S. Typhi strains were struck out from glycerol stocks onto LB agar plates without antibiotic selection and grown overnight at 37°C. For culture conditions specific to particular experiments, please see relevant section below. Since S. Typhi can lose the viaB locus genes through lab passaging, S. Typhi strains were routinely tested for retention of these genes by performing Vi agglutination assays and PCR. To test for Vi agglutination, S. Typhi strains were grown overnight in LB broth at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm. In the morning, they were back-diluted 1:50 into low salt (5 mM NaCl) LB broth and grown for a further 3 hours at 37°C at 200 rpm. Salmonella Vi antiserum (BD Difco #228271) was added to the culture at a 1:100 dilution. After a 10 minute incubation, agglutination was assessed visually under a microscope.

Colony PCRs were routinely performed on freshly struck out S. Typhi strains to verify retention of viaB genes. One bacterial colony was suspended in 100 μl 1x PBS pH 7.4 and incubated at 95°C for 10 minutes before being used as the DNA template in PCR reactions using GoTaq polymerase (Promega #M3008) and primers oSMB64/65 and oSMB75/76 (see S3 Table). PCR products were run on a 0.9% agarose TAE gel and visualized on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc.

For low temperature culturing conditions, E. coli or S. Typhi strains were grown at ambient temperature. The average ambient temperature ranged from 23° to 25°C, as indicated in each figure.

Secondary structure prediction

RNA secondary structures were computed via Mfold web server using the default settings [36].

pBAD plasmid construction

Oligonucleotides and plasmids utilized in this study are summarized in S3 or S4 Tables, respectively. Enzymes for cloning were obtained from Thermo Scientific (NheI #ER0971, EcoRI #ER0271, EcoRV #ER0301, SmaI #ER0661). PCR, DNA manipulations, DNA restrictions, and transformations were performed according to standard protocols [60]. Point mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis according to the instruction manual of the QuikChange mutagenesis kit (Agilent Technologies #210505). All constructed plasmids were confirmed by restriction analysis and automated sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany).

The tviA 5’-UTR:bgaB-His fusion plasmid pBO4421 was constructed as follows: First, a 154 bp fragment was amplified via PCR using primer pair tviA_NheI_fw/tviA_EcoRI. Next, the resulting PCR-product was ligated into the NheI and EcoRI restriction sites of pBAD2-bgaB-His resulting in pBO4421 [42]. Mutations rep3 (T90,92C), derep4 (T89,91G,C93G), rep1 (T90C), and rep2 (T92C) were inserted into pBO4421 via site-directed mutagenesis using primer pairs tviA_rep3_fw/ tviA_rep3_rev, tviA_derep4_fw/ tviA_derep4_rev, tviA_rep1_fw/ tviA_rep1_rev, and tviA_rep2_fw/ tviA_rep2_rev obtaining plasmids pBO4424, pBO4426, pBO4427, and pBO4428, respectively.

The run-off plasmid for in vitro transcription of the tviA 5’-UTR (pBO4439) was constructed by blunt-end ligation of a PCR-amplified DNA fragment (primer tviA_RO_T7_fw/tviA_RO_NaeI_rv), comprising the T7 RNA polymerase promoter and the tviA 5’-UTR including 60 bp of the tviA coding region, into the SmaI restriction site of pUC18. Insertion of the stabilizing mutation rep3 (T90,92C) or destabilizing mutation derep4 (T89,91G,C93G) into pBO4439 was achieved by site-directed mutagenesis (primer pair tviA_rep3_fw/tviA_rep3_rv or tviA_derep4_fw/tviA_derep4_rv), resulting in pBO4447 or pBO4448.

Reporter gene activity assays

Reporter gene assays were conducted as described before [42,44]. For β-galactosidase activity assays, E. coli DH5⍺ cells carrying the tviA 5’-UTR:bgaB fusion plasmids (S4 Table) were grown overnight in LB with ampicillin at 25°C. Before being inoculated with an overnight culture to an OD600 = 0.2, LB media supplemented with ampicillin was pre-warmed to 25°C. After growth under continuous shaking to an OD600 = 0.5, transcription was induced with 0.01% w/v L-arabinose. The culture was split up and shifted to pre-warmed 100 ml flasks (temperatures indicated in the respective figure). The cultures were incubated for 30 min and 400 μl samples were subsequently taken for the β-galactosidase assay. The β-galactosidase assay was carried out as described previously [61]. Standard deviations were calculated from three technical replicates.

In vitro transcription

RNAs for structure probing and primer extension inhibition experiments were synthesized in vitro by run-off transcription with T7 RNA polymerase (Thermo Fisher Scientific #EP0111) from NaeI-linearized plasmids (listed in S4 Table) as previously described [42,44].

Enzymatic structure probing

Structure probing of the 5’-UTR and 60 nt of tviA was performed with in vitro transcribed RNA using pBO4439, pBO4447, and pBO4448 as template. The in vitro transcribed RNA was purified and dephosphorylated using calf intestinal phosphatase enzyme (Thermo Fisher Scientific #18009019 or New England Biolabs #M0290). The RNA was labeled with [32P] at the 5′ end as described elsewhere [62]. Partial digestions of radiolabeled RNA with ribonuclease T1 (0.0025 U; cuts 3’ of unpaired guanines; Thermo Fisher Scientific #EN0541 or Invitrogen Ambion #AM2280) and T2 (0.053 U; cuts 3′ of unpaired nucleotides with a slight preference for adenines; MoBiTec #GE-NUC00400-02) were performed according to Waldminghaus et al. (2007) at 25, 37, and 42°C. For digestion with RNase T1 and RNase T2 a 5 x TN buffer (100 mM Tris acetate, pH 7, 500 mM NaCl) was used. An alkaline hydrolysis ladder was prepared as described before [62]. The T1-ladder was generated by using 30000 cpm labeled RNA. The RNA was heated with 1 μl sequencing buffer (provided with RNase T1) at 90°C. Subsequently, the RNA was incubated with the enzyme at 37°C for 5 min. All resulting fragments were separated by size on an 8% polyacrylamide gel.

Toeprinting

Primer extension and primer extension inhibition analysis (i.e., toeprinting) analysis was performed with 30S ribosomal subunit, in vitro transcribed RNA and tRNAfMet (Sigma Aldrich #63231-63-0) according to a protocol described before [46]. A 5’-[32P]-labeled tviA-specific oligonucleotide tviA_RO_NaeI_rv, complementary to nucleotides +49 to +60 (from ATG) of the tviA mRNA, was used as a primer for cDNA synthesis. The radiolabeled primer (0.16 pmol) was annealed to the tviA mRNA (0.08 pmol) and incubated with 30S ribosomal subunit (24 pmol) or Watanabe buffer (60 mM HEPES/KOH; 10.5 mM Mg(COO)2; 690 mM NH4COO; 12 mM β-mercaptoethanol; 10 mM spermidine; 0.25 mM spermine) in the presence of tRNAfMet (8 pmol) at 25, 37 or 42°C for 10 min. The 30S ribosomal subunit was purified from E. coli cells via density gradient centrifugation or FPLC. After addition of 2 μl MMLV-Mix (VD+Mg2+ buffer, BSA, dNTPs and 800 U MMLV reverse transcriptase; Affymetrix #78306), cDNA synthesis was performed for 10 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by addition of formamide loading dye and samples were separated on an 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The Thermo Sequenase Cycle Sequencing Kit (Affymetrix #78500) was used for sequencing reactions with plasmid pBO4439 as template and radiolabeled primer tviA_RO_NaeI_rv.

Band intensity quantification

To quantify band intensities obtained by enzymatic structure probing as well as toe printing experiments we used the SAFA package [63]. These data (peak areas) obtained from structure probing gel quantification were processed as follows. Prior to normalizing each RNase T1 or T2 signals to the respective maximum signal, band signals resulting from RNA degradation were excluded by subtracting each peak area (band intensity) measured in the control lane (minus RNase) from signals of the respective band in the RNase T1/T2 probing lanes. Toe printing signals were corrected by background signals (signals in -30S lanes) and each signal was normalized to the peak areas detected at 25°C.

S. Typhi strain construction

Both gene knockouts and point mutants in S. Typhi were generated using the scarless genome editing technique described [64]. To transform in the helper plasmid pSLTS, which encodes the meganuclease I-SceI under the control of the anhydrotetracycline-inducible tetA promoter and the lambda red recombinase genes under the control of the arabinose-inducible araB promoter and carries a temperature-sensitive origin of replication, an overnight culture of S. Typhi Ty2 was back-diluted into no salt LB broth and grown to an OD600 of ~0.4–0.8 before washing twice with ice-cold ddH2O. Washed cells were resuspended in ice-cold ddH2O and 100 ng of pSLTS plasmid was electroporated into 50 μl of resuspended bacteria. S. Typhi(pSLTS) was recovered in SOC medium shaking at 30°C before plating on LB+50 μg/ml carbenicillin plates and overnight growth at 30°C.

Mutation cassette plasmids were generated using Gibson Assembly (New England Biolabs #E2611S). The mutation cassettes consisted of Ty2 DNA sequence flanking an antibiotic selection cassette for homologous recombination into the S. Typhi Ty2 chromosome. The Ty2 genomic DNA regions were either obtained as gBlocks (IDT DNA; used to make pSMB11) or amplified from Ty2 genomic DNA using PCR (Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase, Thermo Fisher Scientific #F530L) using primers that contained hanging overlap regions for Gibson assembly. The selection cassette containing the antibiotic marker CmR and I-SceI cut site was amplified from pT2SC via PCR (Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase). The plasmid backbone fragment was amplified via PCR (Phusion High-Fidelity DNA polymerase) from pUC19. Following amplification, all PCR products were gel-purified (Qiagen QIAquick Gel Extraction Kit, Qiagen #28706) prior to Gibson assembly. See S3 Table for primers used and S4 Table for mutation cassette plasmid details. Gibson assembly products were transformed into NEB 5-alpha competent E. coli (New England Biolabs #C2987H) and constructs were screened for correct assembly using Sanger sequencing (ElimBio, Hayward, CA, USA) and primers pHA.seq.F and pHA.seq.R. To generate plasmid pSMB12, plasmid pSMB11 was used as the template to perform site-directed mutagenesis (QuikChange Lightning Multi Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit; Agilent #210505) with primers oSMB113 and oSMB114 following the manufacturer’s instructions.

Following sequencing verification, the mutation cassette (i.e., the plasmid region containing Ty2 genomic DNA sequences flanking the CmR and I-SceI cut site) was PCR-amplified using Phusion polymerase and gel-purified (See S3 Table for primers used to amplify mutation cassettes and S4 Table for descriptions of mutation cassette plasmids). An overnight culture of S. Typhi(pSLTS) in no salt LB broth+50 μg/ml carbenicillin grown at 30°C at 200 rpm was back-diluted 1:100 into no salt LB broth+50 μg/ml carbenicillin and grown shaking at 30°C at 200 rpm. One hour after back-dilution, L-arabinose was added to a final concentration of 2 mM to induce expression of the lambda red recombinase, and the culture was incubated for a further 2–3 hours until the OD600 reached ~0.7–0.9. The culture was washed twice with ice-cold ddH2O before being resuspended in ice-cold ddH2O and then electroporated with 1 μg of the mutation cassette. Transformed bacteria were recovered in SOC shaking at 30°C before plating on LB+50 μg/ml carbenicillin+20 μg/ml chloramphenicol plates and overnight growth at 30°C. Transformants were restruck onto LB+50 μg/ml carbenicillin+20 μg/ml chloramphenicol plates and grown overnight at 30°C. Restruck colonies were suspended in 250 μl 1x PBS pH 7.4, spread onto LB+50 μg/ml carbenicillin+100 ng/ml anhydrotetracycline plates, and grown overnight at 30°C to induce I-SceI expression to loop out the selection cassette. Colonies were then repatched twice onto LB plates without any antibiotic selection and grown at 37°C to cure of pSLTS. To verify loss of pSLTS and the selection cassette, isolates were tested for growth on LB+50 μg/ml carbenicillin and LB+20 μg/ml chloramphenicol, respectively, at both 30°C and 37°C. Sensitive isolates were then screened for the desired mutation by PCR and/or Sanger sequencing (see S3 Table for PCR and sequencing verification primers). All verified strains were stored in 15% glycerol at -80°C.

Microscopy and flow cytometry

S. Typhi strains were grown in LB broth for 6 hours shaking at 200 rpm at 37°C and then transferred to an ambient temperature of 23°C for overnight growth shaking at 200 rpm. In the morning, the cultures were back-diluted into low salt (5 mM NaCl) LB broth to an OD600 of 0.2 and grown shaking at 200 rpm at 23°C until the OD600 reached 0.5–0.6. Cultures were then shifted to 37°C or 42°C or left at 23°C while shaking for 30 minutes to 2 hours, as indicated in the figures.

Following the temperature shift, cultures were transferred to ice and then harvested by spinning at 6000 xg at 4°C for 5 min and washed once in 1x PBS pH 7.4. Bacteria were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde in 1x PBS pH 7.4 for 30 minutes at room temperature. Following two washes with 1x PBS pH 7.4, bacteria were incubated with Salmonella Vi antiserum (BD Difco #228271) diluted 1:250 in 1x PBS pH 7.4 for one hour at room temperature. The bacteria were washed twice with PBS and then stained with anti-rabbit-488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific #A-11008) diluted 1:500 in 1x PBS pH 7.4 for one hour at room temperature in the dark. Following secondary antibody staining, bacteria were washed two more times. For flow cytometry analysis, bacteria were resuspended in 1x PBS pH 7.4+2mM EDTA, and run on an Accuri C6 Plus (BD) flow cytometer. Data were analyzed by FlowJo (FlowJo LLC). For immunofluorescence microscopy analysis, bacteria were added to poly-L-lysine-coated glass coverslips and incubated for 30 minutes in the dark. The coverslips were gently washed twice with PBS before being mounted on glass microscope slides with ProLong Diamond Antifade Mountant (Thermo Fisher Scientific #P36970). The slides were cured for 24 hours in the dark at room temperature before being sealed with clear nail polish and stored at -20°C until imaging on a Zeiss LSM 700 confocal microscope with the ZEN 2010 software. Images were processed using Fiji software (i.e., ImageJ).

Motility plate assay

For each assay, fresh low agar concentration plates (0.3% bacto-agar and 10 g/L bacto-tryptone) were made with either 0 mM NaCl or 150 mM NaCl the day before inoculation. Immediately prior to inoculation, the plates were dried in a biosafety cabinet for 20 minutes to reduce excess surface water. Overnight cultures of S. Typhi grown in LB broth were pelleted at 4500 xg for 5 minutes and then resuspended in 1x PBS pH 7.4. The cultures were diluted to an OD600 = 3.0, and the center of each motility plate was inoculated with 5 μl of the respective diluted strain. The inoculum was allowed to fully dry at room temperature before the plates were placed in a 37°C incubator for 24 hours. Halo diameters were measured with a ruler and images of the plates were captured on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc.

Bacterial RNA extraction and qRT-PCR

E. coli DH5⍺ containing the pBAD-bgaB plasmid with different versions of the tviA 5’ UTR were grown as described for the β-galactosidase activity assay. S. Typhi strains were grown as described for the Vi capsule expression analysis via flow cytometry. Following temperature shifts, 1.5 ml of each culture was pelleted at 6000 xg at 4°C for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and each pellet was resuspended in 500 μl of TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific #15-596-018) and stored at -80°C until RNA extractions could be performed.

To extract RNA, samples were thawed on ice and 100 μl of chloroform was added to each sample before mixing by inversion and centrifugation at 20,000 xg at 4°C for 15 minutes. The aqueous phase was transferred to a new tube and then 150 μl of 70% ethanol was add to each sample. The RNA-ethanol mixture was applied to a column from the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen #74106) and centrifuged at 9400 xg at room temperature for 1 min. The RNeasy Mini Kit was then used to complete the extraction with the following modifications. The column was washed with 350 μl of RW1 buffer and spun at 9400 xg at room temperature for 1 min. 80 μl of RNase-free DNase in RDD buffer was add to each column and the columns were incubated for 15 minutes at room temperature. Another 350 μl RW1 was added to the column and the spin was repeated. This was followed by two washes with 500 μl buffer RPE. A final spin was performed to remove residual RPE buffer before the column was transferred to a clean tube and the RNA was eluted in 35 μl Ultrapure RNase- and DNase-free water. RNA concentration was determined using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and the samples were stored at -80°C. cDNA was generated using the SuperScript III First-Strand Synthesis System (Thermo Fisher Scientific #18080051). The same amount of RNA was added to each reaction to normalize across samples and the manufacturer’s protocol was followed using random hexamers. Synthesized cDNA was stored at -20°C.

To assess expression of bacterial genes, FastStart Universal SYBR Green Master mix (Sigma Aldrich #4913850001) was used in combination with the synthesized cDNA and primers listed in S3 Table. The reactions were run on a Bio-Rad CFX Connect. Relative expression values were calculated using the ΔΔCt method. Each experimental value was first normalized to the housekeeping control (i.e., 16S rRNA) for that particular sample, followed by normalization to the average of a control condition (i.e., the low temperature WT condition).

HT-29 infections

S. Typhi strains were cultured overnight in LB broth at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm. In the morning, the cultures were back-diluted 1:50 into low salt (5 mM NaCl) LB broth and grown at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm for 2–3 hours until the OD600 reached 0.6–0.8 for non-invasive conditions. The bacteria were centrifuged at 4500 xg at room temperature for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed and the bacteria were washed once with 1x PBS pH 7.4 before a final resuspension in PBS and OD600 measurement. The bacteria were diluted in DMEM to infect at an MOI of 25. Media was removed from the serum-starved HT-29 cells, the cells were washed once with DMEM, and then the cells were infected with the diluted bacteria in DMEM. Immediately after adding the bacteria to the cells, the plate was spun at 250 xg for 5 minutes at room temperature before placement in a 37°C 5% CO2 incubator for 1 hour. After one hour, the media was removed and the cells were washed twice with PBS. The media was then replaced with DMEM supplemented with L-glutamine, 2% heat-inactivated FBS, and 100 ug/ml gentamicin. After one hour, the media was removed and the cells were washed twice with PBS before the media was replaced with DMEM supplemented with L-glutamine, 2% heat-inactivated FBS, and 10 ug/ml gentamicin. At 6 and 18 hours post-infection, the supernatants from each well were transferred to a new 96-well plate and stored at -20°C until IL-8 secretion could be assessed following the manufacturer’s instructions for a human IL-8 ELISA (Thermo Fisher Scientific #88-8086-22).

THP-1 and hMDM infections

S. Typhi strains were cultured overnight in LB broth at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm. In the morning, the cultures were back-diluted 1:50 into high salt (300 mM NaCl) LB broth and grown at 37°C shaking at 200 rpm for 2–3 hours until the OD600 reached 0.6–0.8 for invasive (i.e., Salmonella Pathogenicity Island-1-inducing) conditions. The bacteria were centrifuged at 4500 xg at room temperature for 5 minutes. The supernatant was removed and the bacteria were washed once with 1x PBS pH 7.4 before a final resuspension in PBS and OD600 measurement. The bacteria were diluted in RPMI without phenol red (Thermo Fisher Scientific #11835030) to infect at an MOI of 10 or 25, as indicated in figure legends. Media was removed from the differentiated and LPS-primed THP-1 or hMDM cells, the cells were washed once with RPMI without phenol red, and the cells were infected with the diluted bacteria in phenol red-free RPMI supplemented with L-glutamine and 10% FBS. For kinetic cell death experiments, SYTOX Green nucleic acid stain (Thermo Fisher Scientific #S7020) was also added to the media at a final concentration of 20 nM. For Western blot sample infections, RPMI media without FBS was used for the infection. Immediately after adding the bacteria to the cells, the plates were spun at 250 xg for 5 minutes at room temperature before placement in a 37°C 5% CO2 incubator for 1 hour. For kinetic cell death experiments, the plate was placed in an IncuCyte S3 (Essen Bioscience) in a 37°C 5% CO2 incubator and two phase and green fluorescence images were taken per well with the 10x objective every 30 minutes. After one hour, gentamicin was added to a final concentration of 10 μg/ml and the plates were returned to the incubator.

At 2 hours post-infection, 50 μl of supernatant from each well was transferred to a new 96-well plate and stored at -20°C until IL-1β levels could be assessed following the manufacturer’s instructions for a human IL-1β ELISA (Thermo Fisher Scientific #88-7261-88). Another 50 μl of supernatant was used to assess LDH release as a measure of pyroptotic cell death following the manufacturer’s instructions for the CytoTox 96 Non-Radioactive Cytotoxicity Assay (Promega #G1780). Absorbance for the LDH assay was measured at 490 nm on a BioTek Synergy HTX. A “% cell death” was calculated as follows:

ExperimentalabsorbanceUntreatedabsorbanceaverageLysisabsorbanceaverageUntreatedabsorbanceaverage*100

For the kinetic cell death experiments, the IncuCyte S3 software was used to analyze SYTOX Green staining. At the beginning of the infection, a set of uninfected wells were treated with 0.1% Triton X-100 to kill all the THP-1 cells and obtain a “100% cell death” SYTOX Green count. A “% cell death” was calculated as follows:

ExperimentalconditionSYTOXGreencount100%celldeathSYTOXGreencount*100

Western blots

For hMDM Western blot samples, at 2 hours post-infection the supernatants were removed and 20% TCA was added to the supernatants to achieve a final concentration of 10%. The supernatant proteins were precipitated on ice for one hour before centrifugation for 30 minutes at 4°C at 20,000 xg. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was removed and the pellets were washed with ice-cold acetone. The spin was repeated for 10 minutes, after which the supernatant was removed and the pellets were allowed to air dry for 10–20 minutes at room temperature. To harvest the cell lysate proteins, 100 μl of RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 0.1% SDS, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100) with cOmplete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Sigma Aldrich #11836153001) was added to each well after the supernatants were removed for protein precipitation. The plates were incubated on ice for 10 minutes followed by scraping and transfer of the cell lysate to 1.5 ml Eppendorf tubes. The samples were incubated on ice for 30 minutes and then centrifuged for 15 minutes at 4°C at 20,000 xg. Following centrifugation, the supernatant was used to resuspend the TCA-precipitated proteins to obtain a cell lysate+supernatant protein sample, and the samples were stored at -20°C. Prior to running the samples on a gel, total protein was determined for each sample using the Pierce Coomassie (Bradford) Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific #23200). The samples were all normalized to the same protein concentration, 6x Laemmli buffer (final concentration 1x) with β-mercaptoethanol (final concentration 2%) was added, and the samples were boiled for 10 minutes at 95°C.

For S. Typhi Western blot samples, strains were cultured statically for 24 hours under the following conditions: low salt media (5 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, low salt media at 37°C, high salt media (300 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, or high salt media at 37°C. To harvest, the OD600 of each culture was measured and 1x109 CFU of each culture was transferred to a fresh tube and spun at 3200 xg for 20 minutes at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, and each bacterial pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of 1x Laemmli buffer diluted in PBS and supplemented with 5% β-mercaptoethanol. The samples were stored at -20°C and boiled for 10 minutes at 95°C prior to running on a gel.

The hMDM samples were run on 4–20% Mini-PROTEAN TGX Precast protein gels (Bio-Rad #4561093). The S. Typhi samples were run on Criterion 26-well (Bio-Rad #3459903) gels made with the 10% TGX FastCast acrylamide gel kit (Bio-Rad #1610173). The Precision Plus Protein Dual Color Standard (Bio-Rad #161–0394) was used for all gels, and they were blotted onto Trans-blot Turbo PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad #1703127) using a Trans-blot Turbo machine (Bio-Rad). For the S. Typhi Western blots, prior to antibody probing total protein was assessed using SYPRO Ruby Protein Blot Stain (Bio-Rad #1703127) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Membranes were blocked with PBS+0.1% Tween 20 (PBST)+5% milk for 1 hour shaking at room temperature followed by overnight incubation with primary antibody shaking at 4°C. Primary antibody was washed off with PBST shaking at room temperature for 5 minutes for a total of three washes. Membranes were incubated with secondary antibody for 1 hour shaking at room temperature followed by three washes with PBST. SuperSignal West Femto Maximum Sensitivity Substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific #34096) was then added to each blot and chemiluminescent signal was visualized on a Bio-Rad ChemiDoc. Prior to probing the membrane with the next primary antibody, it was stripped using Re-blot Plus Mild Antibody Stripping Solution (Sigma Aldrich #2502) while shaking at room temperature for 15 minutes. Primary antibodies used for hMDM samples: anti-human caspase-1 (R&D Systems #AF6215), anti-human IL-1β (Abcam #ab2105), anti-human cleaved N-terminal GSDMD (Abcam #ab215203), and anti-β-actin (Sigma Aldrich #A1978). Primary antibodies used for S. Typhi samples: adsorbed Salmonella H antiserum d (BD Difco #228231) and anti-E. coli RecA (Bio Academia #61–003). Secondary antibodies used: anti-goat IgG, HRP-linked (Thermo Fisher Scientific #61–1620), anti-rabbit IgG, HRP-linked (GE Healthcare #NA934V), and anti-mouse IgG, HRP-linked (GE Healthcare #NA931V).

Antibody adsorption

To reduce nonspecific antibody staining and increase specificity for flagellin, we cleaned up the Salmonella H antiserum d (BD Difco #228231) via adsorption. A 9 ml overnight culture of S. Typhi strain SMB24 (ΔfliC) in LB broth had formalin added to a final concentration of 0.5%. This mixture was incubated at room temperature with shaking for 24 hours to fix the bacteria. Once fixed, the bacteria were split between 5 tubes and spun at 8000 xg at 4°C for 5 minutes, followed by two washes with 1x PBS pH 7.4. After discarding the supernatant from the second wash, one of the fixed bacterial pellets was resuspended in 200 μl of the Salmonella H antiserum d and incubated on ice for 30 minutes. Following incubation, the tube was centrifuged at 10,000 xg at 4°C for 5 minutes and the supernatant was used to resuspend another pellet of fixed bacteria. This incubation and supernatant transfer process was repeated with all 5 tubes of fixed bacterial pellets. Following the final incubation, the supernatant was transferred to a new tube and stored at -20°C until use for Western blotting.

Sequence alignment

For the alignment of tviA/vipR 5’ UTR sequences, nucleotide sequence information for each Salmonella strain and Citrobacter freundii was downloaded from NCBI or BioCyc (https://biocyc.org/). Benchling was used to create and export an alignment of the sequences.

Statistics

Prism v8.4.3 (GraphPad Software, LLC) was used to create graphical figures and perform statistical analyses. Statistical tests performed and corresponding details are indicated in the figure legends.

The numerical data used in all figures are included in S1 Data.

Supporting information

S1 Data. Excel spreadsheet containing numerical data, in separate sheets, for Figure panels 1c, 1d, 2c, 2d, 2e, S4b, S4c, 4b, 4c, 5a, 5b, 5d, 5f, S5b, 6a, 6b, 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7f, 7g, 7h, S6.

(XLSX)

S1 Table. Related to Fig 3.

Hard constraints for RNA structure prediction.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Bacterial strains used in this study.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Plasmids used in this study.

(DOCX)

S1 Fig. Mechanisms of RNAT- and TviA-mediated regulation.

A) Schematic depicting RNAT function in response to temperature. At low temperatures, Watson-Crick base-pairing in the 5’ UTR of the mRNA generates secondary structure that prevents ribosome access to the SD region and translation. As the temperature increases, the nucleotide bonds melt until the structure is fully open, ribosomes can bind, and translation can occur. B) Schematic depicting effect of osmolarity on TviA production and subsequent virulence factor expression. Under high osmolarity conditions (e.g., intestinal lumen), transcription of tviA is repressed, meaning that S. Typhi has high expression of flagellin and type 3 secretion system-1 (T3SS-1) but does not express Vi capsule. This expression pattern renders S. Typhi motile and invasive. Transition to low osmolarity conditions (e.g., intestinal epithelium or intracellular) induces tviA transcription. TviA then induces Vi capsule expression and suppression of flagellin and T3SS-1 expression, which gives S. Typhi an immune evasive phenotype.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Related to Fig 1.

Example of gating strategy used to identify S. Typhi bacteria and quantitate level of Vi capsule expression following temperature shifts.

(TIF)

S3 Fig. Related to Fig 2.

A and B) Schematic representation of the secondary structure of the tviA RNAT stem (nucleotides 85 to 132 plus AUG codon) including the fourU motif (4U; blue nucleotides), the SD region (black nucleotides), and the AUG codon (orange nucleotides). The desired (A) as well as the Mfold-predicted minimum free energy (B) repressed (mutations highlighted in red) and derepressed (mutations highlighted in green) RNAT structures resulting from nucleotide exchanges are depicted as well. C) Effect of altering base-pairing of the fourU region on temperature-dependent translation. Comparison of translation efficiency at different temperatures using the S. Typhi wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT), the rep1 (T90C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant, and the rep2 (T92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant bgaB fusion constructs. Data shown are representative of 4 independent experiments (C) with triplicate samples for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SD. NS, not significant. Statistical significance determined using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001.

(TIF)

S4 Fig. Related to Fig 3.

A) Entire gel from enzymatic structure probing shown in Fig 3A. 5’ end-labeled in vitro transcribed RNA containing the wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT), the rep3 (T90,92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (REP), or the derep4 (T89,91G;C93G) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (DEREP) was enzymatically probed with RNases T1 (cuts 3’ of single-stranded guanines) and T2 (cuts 3’ of single-stranded nucleotides with preference order: A > C > U > G) at 25, 37, and 42°C. Fragmented RNA was separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel. AL: alkaline ladder. LT1: RNase T1 cleavage in sequence buffer at 37°C. C: RNA treated with water instead of RNase at 42°C. For many residues, the cleavage pattern fit the predicted secondary structure, with nucleotides susceptible to RNase T1 and T2 cleavage at 25°C (see also Fig 3B). These nucleotides are frequently located within predicted hairpin loops (e.g., GGG26-28, UAGG106-109; green highlight) or associated with inter-loop regions (e.g., GA74-75, GG97-98; orange highlight). The conformation of hairpin IB (see Fig 3B) deviates from the predicted structure because paired nucleotide stretches UG52-53 and GAAU68-71 were readily digested by the RNases at 25°C (gray highlight). Conversely, nucleotides UG41-42, AA49-50, and GG60-61, which were predicted to be unpaired, more likely adopt a double-stranded conformation because of increased RNase-mediated cleavage at 37°C and 42°C (purple highlight). B) Quantification of band intensities of RNase T1/T2 cleavage products in the region of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the wildtype tviA 5’ UTR at 25, 37, and 42°C. Data shown are representative of 4 independent experiments.

(TIF)

S5 Fig. Related to Fig 5.

A) Entire Western blot with loading controls shown in Fig 5E. Whole cell lysates of WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi were probed for total protein, flagellin expression, and RecA expression after 24 hours of static growth under the following conditions: low salt media (5 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, low salt media at 37°C, high salt media (300 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, or high salt media at 37°C. B) Quantitation of flagellin expression from Western blot in S5A Fig. Flagellin band intensity was normalized to the RecA loading control band intensity for each sample to demonstrate similar results as seen with normalization to total protein (see Fig 5F). Data shown are representative of 2 independent experiments.

(TIF)

S6 Fig. Related to Fig 6.

Quantitation of cleaved caspase-1 (A), cleaved IL-1β (B), and NT-GSDMD (C) from the Western blot shown in Fig 7I. Band intensities of each cleavage product were normalized to the band intensity of β-actin for each sample before being plotted. Data shown are representative of 2 independent experiments.

(TIF)

S7 Fig. Conservation of the fourU RNAT in Vi capsule-producing, enteric fever-causing human pathogens.

Alignment of the tviA (or equivalent homolog vipR in Citrobacter freundii) 5’ UTR nucleotide sequences from lab strain S. Typhi Ty2, vaccine strain S. Typhi Ty21a, multi-drug resistant clinical isolate S. Typhi CT18, clinical isolate S. Paratyphi C RKS4594, S. Dublin isolate SARB13, or opportunistic pathogen C. freundii reveals conservation of the fourU RNA thermosensor in enteric fever-causing human pathogens. FourU RNA thermosensor (4U) highlighted in red. Shine-Dalgarno (SD) highlighted in blue. Start codon highlighted in green. Asterisks indicate conserved residues between strains.

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Manuel Amieva and members of the Monack and Amieva laboratories for valuable discussions.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Research reported in this publication was supported by grant R01-AI116059 from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, United States (to D.M.M.), Paul Allen Stanford Discovery Center on Systems Modeling of Infection (to D.M.M. https://alleninstitute.org/what-we-do/frontiers-group/discovery-centers/allen-discovery-center-stanford-university/), DFG project NA 240/10-2 from the German Research Foundation (to F.N.), and the Stanford Graduate Fellowship (to S.M.B. https://vpge.stanford.edu/fellowships-funding/sgf). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Steinmann R, Dersch P. Thermosensing to adjust bacterial virulence in a fluctuating environment. Future Microbiol. 2013. January;8(1):85–105. 10.2217/fmb.12.129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Loh E, Righetti F, Eichner H, Twittenhoff C, Narberhaus F. RNA Thermometers in Bacterial Pathogens. Microbiol Spectr. 2018. April 5;6(2):1–16. 10.1128/microbiolspec.RWR-0012-2017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.). Antibiotic resistance threats in the United States, 2019. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (U.S.); 2019 Nov pp. 1–150.
  • 4.Dougan G, Baker S. Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and the pathogenesis of typhoid fever. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2014;68:317–36. 10.1146/annurev-micro-091313-103739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Tsolis RM, Young GM, Solnick JV, Bäumler AJ. From bench to bedside: stealth of enteroinvasive pathogens. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2008. October 28;6(12):883–92. 10.1038/nrmicro2012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McClelland M, Sanderson KE, Spieth J, Clifton SW, Latreille P, Courtney L, et al. Complete genome sequence of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature. 2001. October 25;413(6858):852–6. 10.1038/35101614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Johnson EM, Baron LS. Genetic transfer of the Vi antigen from Salmonella typhosa to Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol. 1969. July;99(1):358–9. 10.1128/JB.99.1.358-359.1969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Virlogeux I, Waxin H, Ecobichon C, Popoff MY. Role of the viaB locus in synthesis, transport and expression of Salmonella typhi Vi antigen. Microbiology. 1995. December;141 (Pt 12)(12):3039–47. 10.1099/13500872-141-12-3039 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Raffatellu M, Chessa D, Wilson RP, Dusold R, Rubino S, Bäumler AJ. The Vi capsular antigen of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi reduces Toll-like receptor-dependent interleukin-8 expression in the intestinal mucosa. Infect Immun. 2005. June;73(6):3367–74. 10.1128/IAI.73.6.3367-3374.2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wangdi T, Lee C-Y, Spees AM, Yu C, Kingsbury DD, Winter SE, et al. The Vi Capsular Polysaccharide Enables Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi to Evade Microbe-Guided Neutrophil Chemotaxis. PLoS Pathog. 2014. August 7;10(8):e1004306–9. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004306 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wilson RP, Raffatellu M, Chessa D, Winter SE, Tükel Ç, Bäumler AJ. The Vi-capsule prevents Toll-like receptor 4 recognition of Salmonella. Cell Microbiol. 2008. April;10(4):876–90. 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.01090.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wilson RP, Winter SE, Spees AM, Winter MG, Nishimori JH, Sanchez JF, et al. The Vi capsular polysaccharide prevents complement receptor 3-mediated clearance of Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi. Infect Immun. 2011. February;79(2):830–7. 10.1128/IAI.00961-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hornick RB, Greisman SE, Woodward TE, DuPont HL, Dawkins AT, Snyder MJ. Typhoid fever: pathogenesis and immunologic control. N Engl J Med. 1970. September 24;283(13):686–91. 10.1056/NEJM197009242831306 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Pickard D, Li J, Roberts M, Maskell D, Hone D, Levine M, et al. Characterization of defined ompR mutants of Salmonella typhi: ompR is involved in the regulation of Vi polysaccharide expression. Infect Immun. 1994. September;62(9):3984–93. 10.1128/IAI.62.9.3984-3993.1994 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Winter SE, Winter MG, Thiennimitr P, Gerriets VA, Nuccio S-P, Rüssmann H, et al. The TviA auxiliary protein renders the Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi RcsB regulon responsive to changes in osmolarity. Mol Microbiol. 2009. October;74(1):175–93. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2009.06859.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Arricau N, Hermant D, Waxin H, Ecobichon C, Duffey PS, Popoff MY. The RcsB-RcsC regulatory system of Salmonella typhi differentially modulates the expression of invasion proteins, flagellin and Vi antigen in response to osmolarity. Mol Microbiol. 1998. August;29(3):835–50. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00976.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zhao L, Ezak T, Li ZY, Kawamura Y, Hirose K, Watanabe H. Vi-Suppressed wild strain Salmonella typhi cultured in high osmolarity is hyperinvasive toward epithelial cells and destructive of Peyer’s patches. Microbiol Immunol. 2001;45(2):149–58. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb01283.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Winter SE, Winter MG, Godinez I, Yang H-J, Rüssmann H, Andrews-Polymenis HL, et al. A Rapid Change in Virulence Gene Expression during the Transition from the Intestinal Lumen into Tissue Promotes Systemic Dissemination of Salmonella. PLoS Pathog. 2010. August 19;6(8):e1001060–13. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1001060 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gewirtz AT, Navas TA, Lyons S, Godowski PJ, Madara JL. Cutting Edge: Bacterial Flagellin Activates Basolaterally Expressed TLR5 to Induce Epithelial Proinflammatory Gene Expression. J Immunol. 2001. August 15;167(4):1882–5. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.4.1882 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Hayashi F, Smith KD, Ozinsky A, Hawn TR, Yi EC, Goodlett DR, et al. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature. 2001. April 26;410(6832):1099–103. 10.1038/35074106 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kofoed EM, Vance RE. Innate immune recognition of bacterial ligands by NAIPs determines inflammasome specificity. Nature. 2011. September 19;477(7366):592–5. 10.1038/nature10394 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kortmann J, Brubaker SW, Monack DM. Cutting Edge: Inflammasome Activation in Primary Human Macrophages Is Dependent on Flagellin. J Immunol. 2015. August 1;195(3):815–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1403100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Miao EA, Alpuche-Aranda CM, Dors M, Clark AE, Bader MW, Miller SI, et al. Cytoplasmic flagellin activates caspase-1 and secretion of interleukin 1β via Ipaf. Nat Immunol. 2006. April 30;7(6):569–75. 10.1038/ni1344 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miao EA, Mao DP, Yudkovsky N, Bonneau R, Lorang CG, Warren SE, et al. Innate immune detection of the type III secretion apparatus through the NLRC4 inflammasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010. February 16;107(7):3076–80. 10.1073/pnas.0913087107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rayamajhi M, Zak DE, Chavarria-Smith J, Vance RE, Miao EA. Cutting Edge: Mouse NAIP1 Detects the Type III Secretion System Needle Protein. J Immunol. 2013. October 4;191(8):3986–9. 10.4049/jimmunol.1301549 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reyes Ruiz VM, Ramirez J, Naseer N, Palacio NM, Siddarthan IJ, Yan BM, et al. Broad detection of bacterial type III secretion system and flagellin proteins by the human NAIP/NLRC4 inflammasome. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017. December 12;114(50):13242–7. 10.1073/pnas.1710433114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Winter SE, Winter MG, Atluri V, Poon V, Romão EL, Tsolis RM, et al. The flagellar regulator TviA reduces pyroptosis by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Infect Immun. 2015. April;83(4):1546–55. 10.1128/IAI.02803-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Yang J, Zhao Y, Shi J, Shao F. Human NAIP and mouse NAIP1 recognize bacterial type III secretion needle protein for inflammasome activation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013. August 27;110(35):14408–13. 10.1073/pnas.1306376110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Zhao Y, Yang J, Shi J, Gong Y-N, Lu Q, Xu H, et al. The NLRC4 inflammasome receptors for bacterial flagellin and type III secretion apparatus. Nature. 2011. September 19;477(7366):596–600. 10.1038/nature10510 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karkey A, Jombart T, Walker AW, Thompson CN, Torres A, Dongol S, et al. The Ecological Dynamics of Fecal Contamination and Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi A in Municipal Kathmandu Drinking Water. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016. January 6;10(1):e0004346–18. 10.1371/journal.pntd.0004346 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Böhme K, Steinmann R, Kortmann J, Seekircher S, Heroven AK, Berger E, et al. Concerted Actions of a Thermo-labile Regulator and a Unique Intergenic RNA Thermosensor Control Yersinia Virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2012. February 16;8(2):e1002518–23. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Delvillani F, Sciandrone B, Peano C, Petiti L, Berens C, Georgi C, et al. Tet-Trap, a genetic approach to the identification of bacterial RNA thermometers: application to Pseudomonas aeruginosa. RNA. 2014. November 17;20(12):1963–76. 10.1261/rna.044354.114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Grosso-Becerra MV, Croda-Garcia G, Merino E, Servin-Gonzalez L, Mojica-Espinosa R, Soberon-Chavez G. Regulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors by two novel RNA thermometers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014. October 28;111(43):15562–7. 10.1073/pnas.1402536111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Johansson J, Mandin P, Renzoni A, Chiaruttini C, Springer M, Cossart P. An RNA thermosensor controls expression of virulence genes in Listeria monocytogenes. Cell. 2002. September 6;110(5):551–61. 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00905-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Weber GG, Kortmann J, Narberhaus F, Klose KE. RNA thermometer controls temperature-dependent virulence factor expression in Vibrio cholerae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014. September 30;111(39):14241–6. 10.1073/pnas.1411570111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Zuker M. Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003. July 1;31(13):3406–15. 10.1093/nar/gkg595 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Klinkert B, Cimdins A, Gaubig LC, Roßmanith J, Aschke-Sonnenborn U, Narberhaus F. Thermogenetic tools to monitor temperature-dependent gene expression in bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2012. July 31;160(1–2):55–63. 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2012.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kortmann J, Narberhaus F. Bacterial RNA thermometers: molecular zippers and switches. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2012. March 16;10(4):255–65. 10.1038/nrmicro2730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kouse AB, Righetti F, Kortmann J, Narberhaus F, Murphy ER. RNA-Mediated Thermoregulation of Iron-Acquisition Genes in Shigella dysenteriae and Pathogenic Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE. 2013. May 21;8(5):e63781–13. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Matsunaga J, Schlax PJ, Haake DA. Role for cis-acting RNA sequences in the temperature-dependent expression of the multiadhesive Lig proteins in Leptospira interrogans. J Bacteriol. 2013. November;195(22):5092–101. 10.1128/JB.00663-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Waldminghaus T, Heidrich N, Brantl S, Narberhaus F. FourU: a novel type of RNA thermometer in Salmonella. Mol Microbiol. 2007. July;65(2):413–24. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05794.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Righetti F, Nuss AM, Twittenhoff C, Beele S, Urban K, Will S, et al. Temperature-responsive in vitro RNA structurome of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016. June 28;113(26):7237–42. 10.1073/pnas.1523004113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Waldminghaus T, Gaubig LC, Klinkert B, Narberhaus F. The Escherichia coli ibpA thermometer is comprised of stable and unstable structural elements. RNA Biol. 2009. September;6(4):455–63. 10.4161/rna.6.4.9014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Twittenhoff C, Heroven AK, Mühlen S, Dersch P, Narberhaus F. An RNA thermometer dictates production of a secreted bacterial toxin. PLoS Pathog. 2020. January 17;16(1):e1008184–29. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Darty K, Denise A, Ponty Y. VARNA: Interactive drawing and editing of the RNA secondary structure. Bioinformatics. 2009. April 27;25(15):1974–5. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Hartz D, McPheeters DS, Traut R, Gold L. Extension inhibition analysis of translation initiation complexes. Methods Enzymol. 1988;164:419–25. 10.1016/s0076-6879(88)64058-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Cimdins A, Roßmanith J, Langklotz S, Bandow JE, Narberhaus F. Differential control of Salmonella heat shock operons by structured mRNAs. Mol Microbiol. 2013. August;89(4):715–31. 10.1111/mmi.12308 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Murphy ER, Roßmanith J, Sieg J, Fris ME, Hussein H, Kouse AB, et al. Regulation of OmpA Translation and Shigella dysenteriae Virulence by an RNA Thermometer. Infect Immun. 2020. February 20;88(3). 10.1128/IAI.00871-19 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Brooks EM, Sheflin LG, Spaulding SW. Secondary structure in the 3’ UTR of EGF and the choice of reverse transcriptases affect the detection of message diversity by RT-PCR. Biotechniques. 1995. November;19(5):806–12–814–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Price AE, Shamardani K, Lugo KA, Deguine J, Roberts AW, Lee BL, et al. A Map of Toll-like Receptor Expression in the Intestinal Epithelium Reveals Distinct Spatial, Cell Type-Specific, and Temporal Patterns. Immunity. 2018. September 18;49(3):560–6. 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.07.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stanifer ML, Mukenhirn M, Muenchau S, Pervolaraki K, Kanaya T, Albrecht D, et al. Asymmetric distribution of TLR3 leads to a polarized immune response in human intestinal epithelial cells. Nat Microbiol. 2020. January;5(1):181–91. 10.1038/s41564-019-0594-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Raffatellu M, Santos RL, Chessa D, Wilson RP, Winter SE, Rossetti CA, et al. The Capsule Encoding the viaB Locus Reduces Interleukin-17 Expression and Mucosal Innate Responses in the Bovine Intestinal Mucosa during Infection with Salmonella enterica Serotype Typhi. Infect Immun. 2007. August 17;75(9):4342–50. 10.1128/IAI.01571-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mohammed M, Vignaud M-L, Cadel-Six S. Whole-Genome Sequences of Two Salmonella enterica Serovar Dublin Strains That Harbor the viaA, viaB, and ompB Loci of the Vi Antigen. Thrash JC, editor. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2019. April 4;8(14):389–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Pickard D, Wain J, Baker S, Line A, Chohan S, Fookes M, et al. Composition, Acquisition, and Distribution of the Vi Exopolysaccharide-Encoding Salmonella enterica Pathogenicity Island SPI-7. J Bacteriol. 2003. September 1;185(17):5055–65. 10.1128/jb.185.17.5055-5065.2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Raffatellu M, Chessa D, Wilson RP, Tükel Ç, Akçelik M, Bäumler AJ. Capsule-Mediated Immune Evasion: a New Hypothesis Explaining Aspects of Typhoid Fever Pathogenesis. Infect Immun. 2006. January;74(1):19–27. 10.1128/IAI.74.1.19-27.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liston SD, Ovchinnikova OG, Whitfield C. Unique lipid anchor attaches Vi antigen capsule to the surface of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2016. June 14;113(24):6719–24. 10.1073/pnas.1524665113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ou JT, Baron LS, Rubin FA, Kopecko DJ. Specific insertion and deletion of insertion sequence 1-like DNA element causes the reversible expression of the virulence capsular antigen Vi of Citrobacter freundii in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1988. June;85(12):4402–5. 10.1073/pnas.85.12.4402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Evans SS, Repasky EA, Fisher DT. Fever and the thermal regulation of immunity: the immune system feels the heat. Nat Rev Immunol. 2015. May 15;15(6):335–49. 10.1038/nri3843 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Casadevall A. Thermal Restriction as an Antimicrobial Function of Fever. PLoS Pathog. 2016. May 5;12(5):e1005577–4. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sambrook J and Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 1st ed. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Gaubig LC, Waldminghaus T, Narberhaus F. Multiple layers of control govern expression of the Escherichia coli ibpAB heat-shock operon. Microbiology. 2011. January 1;157(1):66–76. 10.1099/mic.0.043802-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Brantl S, Wagner EG. Antisense RNA-mediated transcriptional attenuation occurs faster than stable antisense/target RNA pairing: an in vitro study of plasmid pIP501. EMBO J. 1994. August 1;13(15):3599–607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Das R, Laederach A, Pearlman SM, Herschlag D, Altmann RB. SAFA: Semi-automated footprinting analysis software for high-throughput quantification of nucleic acid footprinting experiments. RNA. 2005. January 20;11(3):344–54. 10.1261/rna.7214405 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Kim J, Webb AM, Kershner JP, Blaskowski S, Copley SD. A versatile and highly efficient method for scarless genome editing in Escherichia coli and Salmonella enterica. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14(1):84–13. 10.1186/1472-6750-14-84 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Leigh Knodler, Renée M Tsolis

Transfer Alert

This paper was transferred from another journal. As a result, its full editorial history (including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present.

18 Nov 2020

Dear Denise,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "A Salmonella Typhi RNA thermosensor regulates virulence factors and innate immune evasion in response to host temperature" for consideration at PLOS Pathogens. As with all papers reviewed by the journal, your manuscript was reviewed by members of the editorial board and by several independent reviewers. The reviewers appreciated the attention to an important topic. Based on the reviews, we are likely to accept this manuscript for publication, providing that you modify the manuscript according to the review recommendations.

Please prepare and submit your revised manuscript within 30 days. If you anticipate any delay, please let us know the expected resubmission date by replying to this email. 

When you are ready to resubmit, please upload the following:

[1] A letter containing a detailed list of your responses to all review comments, and a description of the changes you have made in the manuscript. 

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out

[2] Two versions of the revised manuscript: one with either highlights or tracked changes denoting where the text has been changed; the other a clean version (uploaded as the manuscript file).

Important additional instructions are given below your reviewer comments.

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive so far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Leigh Knodler

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Renée Tsolis

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Part I - Summary

Please use this section to discuss strengths/weaknesses of study, novelty/significance, general execution and scholarship.

Reviewer #1: In their study, Brewer et al. identify an RNA thermometer (RNAT) in the 5’UTR of the tviA mRNA of Salmonella Typhi, encoding a transcriptional master regulator of a well-defined regulon that comprises motility, virulence and immune evasion factors. Using a combination of genetics, RNA biochemical and phenotypic assays, the authors present mechanistic data that demonstrates that the tviA RNAT regulates translation initiation of TviA in a temperature-dependent manner, which in turn affects motility and Vi capsule expression of S. Typhi, and consequently, the host immune response to infection. Integrated with the previously known transcriptional induction of tviA through the OmpR/EnvZ two-component system, these new data suggest a compelling working model in which TviA expression is coupled to both, elevated temperature and low osmolarity, to ensure that the transition from an invasive, motile lifestyle to immune evasion occurs at the appropriate stage of the S. Typhi infection cycle.

The presented experiments were well-conducted and support the drawn conclusions. Further, the study is both, timely and relevant. I only have a few minor comments that I hope will be useful for the authors to further improve this interesting study.

Reviewer #2: Brewer et al describe the discovery and characterisation of an RNA thermosensor in the 5’ UTR region of the tviA gene of Salmonella Typhi. From the initial observation that the Vi polysaccharide expression was temperature sensitive but not as a result of transcriptional changes to the master regulator tviA, they discover a sequence with structural characteristics consistent with that of a RNAT. Through site directed mutagenesis they construct recombinant strains with altered structural properties that convincingly demonstrate that this is indeed an RNAT. The role of the RNAT in regulating expression of the viaB locus that affected the innate immune response and motility is then addressed.

This is a well written manuscript describing an excellent study that identifies a previously unknown regulatory level in the expression of an important virulence factor in S. Typhi. It is therefore highly novel and important piece of work. The only weakness is the use of three replicates throughout results in low statistical power. In general, this does not affect the major conclusions due to very low variance and large differences in the mean in most data. However, where means are similar, this may have resulted in falsely accepting the null hypothesis.

Reviewer #3: (No Response)

**********

Part II – Major Issues: Key Experiments Required for Acceptance

Please use this section to detail the key new experiments or modifications of existing experiments that should be absolutely required to validate study conclusions.

Generally, there should be no more than 3 such required experiments or major modifications for a "Major Revision" recommendation. If more than 3 experiments are necessary to validate the study conclusions, then you are encouraged to recommend "Reject".

Reviewer #1: (No Response)

Reviewer #2: (No Response)

Reviewer #3: Manuscript by Brewer et al investigates the role of 5’ UTR region of tviA, a transcriptional regulator of the critical virulence factors Vi 
capsule, flagellin, and type III secretion system-1 expression, of S. Typhi. Authors identify a RNA thermosensor (RNAT) in the UTR region and show that this region post-transcriptionally controls the TviA protein. Using in vitro reporter system in E. coli and point mutations in the tviA 5’ UTR that either stabilize or destabilize the RNAT structure, the authors RNAT in UTR region is closed therefore the tviA is repressed at low temperatures. Authors also show that the RNAT melts open at higher temperatures allowing ribosome access and the translation of tviA. Authors go on to show that this system controls the expression of Vi and repression of flagella in a temperature dependent way. However, the growth in high salt (150mM NaCl) conditions can override and induce maximal suppression of flagellin expression.By utilizing mutants where the RNAT structure is stabilized or destabilized, authors show that the regulation of flagellin expression would be detected by the host inflammasome in THP-1 macrophages. Overall this is an elegant investigation of the temperature dependent regulation of tviA. The manuscript is well written. My only concern is the big conclusion drawn in Fig 8 is not fully supported. Although the RNAT function was investigated in high and low temperature or in high and low osmolarity, these experiments were done separately. To conclude the combinatorial effect of these conditions, authors should perform the experiments in the four conditions as proposed in Fig 8, high osmolarity and low temperature, high osmolarity and high temperature, low osmolarity and low temperature, low osmolarity and high temperature. There are no in vivo experiments to support the hypothesis in Fig 8 but at least if the in vitro experiments can mimic what might be happening in vivo, this would increase the impact of the findings

**********

Part III – Minor Issues: Editorial and Data Presentation Modifications

Please use this section for editorial suggestions as well as relatively minor modifications of existing data that would enhance clarity.

Reviewer #1: • Experimental data were typically collected over several independent experiments, each performed in technical replicates. However, it seems as if for the presentation of the data often times just one (representative) biological replicate with all its technical replicates was shown (e.g. Fig. 1). Unless there is a reason against it (e.g. large donor variability for the assays with primary human macrophages), I would however prefer plotting individual biological – rather than technical – replicates.

• Fig. 2E: Do the authors have an explanation for the (RNAT-independent) increase of bgaB mRNA levels at 42°C? Unless the pBAD promoter responds to temperature, this would imply that the mRNA is more stable in the warmth.

• Fig. 7A, D, E: Some data points are below the 0% line. How can the percentage of cell death be negative?

• Western blot in Fig. 7I: The effect of mutating the tviA RNAT (‘tvi-REP’) or deleting the entire gene (‘ΔtviA’) is less clear on the CASP1 and IL1b band signals than it is on GSDMD. Could the authors quantify band intensities for this western blot (as they do for the toeprinting assay in Fig. 4B, C)?

Text edits:

• Line 159: In the main text, the authors use a different numbering system (“position 123 to 127 within the 5’UTR”) than in the referenced figure (“-132 nt to +3 nt from AUG”; line 170 and Fig. 2A). For reasons of consistency, this may be homogenized.

• Lines 184 and 375: Please correct “16S mRNA” to “16S rRNA”.

• Lines 279, 281, 295, 296: The authors may want to label stems/hairpins I and II in Fig. 2A to allow the readers to better follow these text parts.

• Lines 339-341: Please specify to which UTR variant the quantifications in B and C refer. (I assume it’s the wild-type, but since there are additional UTR variants depicted on the gel in panel A, it should probably be mentioned explicitly.)

• The names of the bacterial mutant strains in Fig. 7D and E should be italicized (as done in the remaining panels of this figure).

Reviewer #2: General comment

1. Data in figure 1 includes treatment at 23C and later experiments equivalent low temperature treatments are at 25C. Is this a typo, or were the experiments really performed at different temperatures and if so was there a rationale for this change?

2. At what temperature does the RNAT de-repress translation of TviA?

Specific comments

3. 156 'S' should be italics.

4. 156-158. Please describe the use of Mfold in Materials and Methods.

5. 162-167. Please make it clear why these structural elements were indicative of a cis-regulatory thermosensor. Suggest citing studies in which similar structures were shown to have these functions.

6. 588-590. These are new data analysis and I suggest that they are included in the results section. The tviA 5' UTR of S. Paratyphi C and S. Dublin are included in the alignment in Figure S5 and should also be mentioned in the text. Currently only the presence of the genes in these serovars is mentioned.

7. 163. Please comment on whether the presence of an additional adenine in the S. Typhi sequence (bulging adenine) that is absent in Dublin and Paratyphi C would be expected to affect the thermostability of the secondary structure. Would you expect this to affect thermoregulation in Paratyphi C and Dublin?

8. 809. Please provide information on the source of 30S ribosomal subunit

9. 956-959. A description of how relative expression levels were calculated should be included. Presumably this was the delta delta Ct method?

Reviewer #3: No minor issues detected.

**********

PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Alexander Westermann

Reviewer #2: No

Reviewer #3: No

Figure Files:

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email us at figures@plos.org.

Data Requirements:

Please note that, as a condition of publication, PLOS' data policy requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions outlined in your manuscript. Data must be deposited in an appropriate repository, included within the body of the manuscript, or uploaded as supporting information. This includes all numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.. For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5.

Reproducibility:

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, PLOS recommends that you deposit laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/s/submission-guidelines#loc-materials-and-methods

Decision Letter 1

Leigh Knodler, Renée M Tsolis

28 Jan 2021

Dear Denise,

We are pleased to inform you that your manuscript 'A Salmonella Typhi RNA thermosensor regulates virulence factors and innate immune evasion in response to host temperature' has been provisionally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

Before your manuscript can be formally accepted you will need to complete some formatting changes, which you will receive in a follow up email. A member of our team will be in touch with a set of requests.

Please note that your manuscript will not be scheduled for publication until you have made the required changes, so a swift response is appreciated.

IMPORTANT: The editorial review process is now complete. PLOS will only permit corrections to spelling, formatting or significant scientific errors from this point onwards. Requests for major changes, or any which affect the scientific understanding of your work, will cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript.

Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us now if you or your institution is planning to press release the article. All press must be co-ordinated with PLOS.

Thank you again for supporting Open Access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Leigh Knodler

Guest Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Renée Tsolis

Section Editor

PLOS Pathogens

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

***********************************************************

Reviewer Comments (if any, and for reference):

Acceptance letter

Leigh Knodler, Renée M Tsolis

23 Feb 2021

Dear Dr. Monack,

We are delighted to inform you that your manuscript, "A Salmonella Typhi RNA thermosensor regulates virulence factors and innate immune evasion in response to host temperature," has been formally accepted for publication in PLOS Pathogens.

We have now passed your article onto the PLOS Production Department who will complete the rest of the pre-publication process. All authors will receive a confirmation email upon publication.

The corresponding author will soon be receiving a typeset proof for review, to ensure errors have not been introduced during production. Please review the PDF proof of your manuscript carefully, as this is the last chance to correct any scientific or type-setting errors. Please note that major changes, or those which affect the scientific understanding of the work, will likely cause delays to the publication date of your manuscript. Note: Proofs for Front Matter articles (Pearls, Reviews, Opinions, etc...) are generated on a different schedule and may not be made available as quickly.

Soon after your final files are uploaded, the early version of your manuscript, if you opted to have an early version of your article, will be published online. The date of the early version will be your article's publication date. The final article will be published to the same URL, and all versions of the paper will be accessible to readers.

Thank you again for supporting open-access publishing; we are looking forward to publishing your work in PLOS Pathogens.

Best regards,

Kasturi Haldar

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0001-5065-158X

Michael Malim

Editor-in-Chief

PLOS Pathogens

orcid.org/0000-0002-7699-2064

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Data. Excel spreadsheet containing numerical data, in separate sheets, for Figure panels 1c, 1d, 2c, 2d, 2e, S4b, S4c, 4b, 4c, 5a, 5b, 5d, 5f, S5b, 6a, 6b, 7a, 7b, 7c, 7d, 7e, 7f, 7g, 7h, S6.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Table. Related to Fig 3.

    Hard constraints for RNA structure prediction.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Bacterial strains used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Oligonucleotides used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Plasmids used in this study.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Fig. Mechanisms of RNAT- and TviA-mediated regulation.

    A) Schematic depicting RNAT function in response to temperature. At low temperatures, Watson-Crick base-pairing in the 5’ UTR of the mRNA generates secondary structure that prevents ribosome access to the SD region and translation. As the temperature increases, the nucleotide bonds melt until the structure is fully open, ribosomes can bind, and translation can occur. B) Schematic depicting effect of osmolarity on TviA production and subsequent virulence factor expression. Under high osmolarity conditions (e.g., intestinal lumen), transcription of tviA is repressed, meaning that S. Typhi has high expression of flagellin and type 3 secretion system-1 (T3SS-1) but does not express Vi capsule. This expression pattern renders S. Typhi motile and invasive. Transition to low osmolarity conditions (e.g., intestinal epithelium or intracellular) induces tviA transcription. TviA then induces Vi capsule expression and suppression of flagellin and T3SS-1 expression, which gives S. Typhi an immune evasive phenotype.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Related to Fig 1.

    Example of gating strategy used to identify S. Typhi bacteria and quantitate level of Vi capsule expression following temperature shifts.

    (TIF)

    S3 Fig. Related to Fig 2.

    A and B) Schematic representation of the secondary structure of the tviA RNAT stem (nucleotides 85 to 132 plus AUG codon) including the fourU motif (4U; blue nucleotides), the SD region (black nucleotides), and the AUG codon (orange nucleotides). The desired (A) as well as the Mfold-predicted minimum free energy (B) repressed (mutations highlighted in red) and derepressed (mutations highlighted in green) RNAT structures resulting from nucleotide exchanges are depicted as well. C) Effect of altering base-pairing of the fourU region on temperature-dependent translation. Comparison of translation efficiency at different temperatures using the S. Typhi wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT), the rep1 (T90C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant, and the rep2 (T92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant bgaB fusion constructs. Data shown are representative of 4 independent experiments (C) with triplicate samples for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SD. NS, not significant. Statistical significance determined using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s correction. * p < 0.05, **** p < 0.0001.

    (TIF)

    S4 Fig. Related to Fig 3.

    A) Entire gel from enzymatic structure probing shown in Fig 3A. 5’ end-labeled in vitro transcribed RNA containing the wildtype tviA 5’ UTR (WT), the rep3 (T90,92C) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (REP), or the derep4 (T89,91G;C93G) tviA 5’ UTR mutant (DEREP) was enzymatically probed with RNases T1 (cuts 3’ of single-stranded guanines) and T2 (cuts 3’ of single-stranded nucleotides with preference order: A > C > U > G) at 25, 37, and 42°C. Fragmented RNA was separated on an 8% polyacrylamide gel. AL: alkaline ladder. LT1: RNase T1 cleavage in sequence buffer at 37°C. C: RNA treated with water instead of RNase at 42°C. For many residues, the cleavage pattern fit the predicted secondary structure, with nucleotides susceptible to RNase T1 and T2 cleavage at 25°C (see also Fig 3B). These nucleotides are frequently located within predicted hairpin loops (e.g., GGG26-28, UAGG106-109; green highlight) or associated with inter-loop regions (e.g., GA74-75, GG97-98; orange highlight). The conformation of hairpin IB (see Fig 3B) deviates from the predicted structure because paired nucleotide stretches UG52-53 and GAAU68-71 were readily digested by the RNases at 25°C (gray highlight). Conversely, nucleotides UG41-42, AA49-50, and GG60-61, which were predicted to be unpaired, more likely adopt a double-stranded conformation because of increased RNase-mediated cleavage at 37°C and 42°C (purple highlight). B) Quantification of band intensities of RNase T1/T2 cleavage products in the region of the Shine-Dalgarno sequence of the wildtype tviA 5’ UTR at 25, 37, and 42°C. Data shown are representative of 4 independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S5 Fig. Related to Fig 5.

    A) Entire Western blot with loading controls shown in Fig 5E. Whole cell lysates of WT, ΔfliC, ΔtviA, tviA-REP, or tviA-DEREP S. Typhi were probed for total protein, flagellin expression, and RecA expression after 24 hours of static growth under the following conditions: low salt media (5 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, low salt media at 37°C, high salt media (300 mM NaCl LB broth) at 23°C, or high salt media at 37°C. B) Quantitation of flagellin expression from Western blot in S5A Fig. Flagellin band intensity was normalized to the RecA loading control band intensity for each sample to demonstrate similar results as seen with normalization to total protein (see Fig 5F). Data shown are representative of 2 independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S6 Fig. Related to Fig 6.

    Quantitation of cleaved caspase-1 (A), cleaved IL-1β (B), and NT-GSDMD (C) from the Western blot shown in Fig 7I. Band intensities of each cleavage product were normalized to the band intensity of β-actin for each sample before being plotted. Data shown are representative of 2 independent experiments.

    (TIF)

    S7 Fig. Conservation of the fourU RNAT in Vi capsule-producing, enteric fever-causing human pathogens.

    Alignment of the tviA (or equivalent homolog vipR in Citrobacter freundii) 5’ UTR nucleotide sequences from lab strain S. Typhi Ty2, vaccine strain S. Typhi Ty21a, multi-drug resistant clinical isolate S. Typhi CT18, clinical isolate S. Paratyphi C RKS4594, S. Dublin isolate SARB13, or opportunistic pathogen C. freundii reveals conservation of the fourU RNA thermosensor in enteric fever-causing human pathogens. FourU RNA thermosensor (4U) highlighted in red. Shine-Dalgarno (SD) highlighted in blue. Start codon highlighted in green. Asterisks indicate conserved residues between strains.

    (TIF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Brewer_et al_2021_Response to reviewer comments.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS Pathogens are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES