Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0246997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246997

A pilot study of inflammatory mediators in brain extracellular fluid in paediatric TBM

Nicholas W Loxton 1, Ursula K Rohlwink 1,2,3, Mvuwo Tshavhungwe 1, Lindizwe Dlamini 1, Muki Shey 4,5, Nico Enslin 1,2, Anthony Figaji 1,2,*
Editor: Richard Bruce Mink6
PMCID: PMC7954352  PMID: 33711020

Abstract

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is the most fatal form of tuberculosis and frequently occurs in children. The inflammatory process initiates secondary brain injury processes that lead to death and disability. Much remains unknown about this cerebral inflammatory process, largely because of the difficulty in studying the brain. To date, studies have typically examined samples from sites distal to the site of disease, such as spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood. In this pilot study, we examined the feasibility of using direct brain microdialysis (MD) to detect inflammatory mediators in brain extracellular fluid (ECF) in TBM. MD was used to help guide neurocritical care in 7 comatose children with TBM by monitoring brain chemistry for up to 4 days. Remnant ECF fluid was stored for offline analysis. Samples of ventricular CSF, lumbar CSF and blood were collected at clinically indicated procedures for comparison. Inflammatory mediators were quantified using multiplex technology. All inflammatory markers, with the exception of interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12p40, were detected in the ECF. Cytokine concentrations were generally lower in ECF than ventricular CSF in time-linked specimens. Individual cases showed ECF cytokine increases coinciding with marked increases in ECF glycerol or decreases in ECF glucose. Cytokine levels and glycerol were generally higher in patients with more severe disease. This is the first report of inflammatory marker analysis from samples derived directly from the brain and in high temporal resolution, demonstrating feasibility of cerebral MD to explore disease progression and possibly therapy response in TBM.

Introduction

Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) is an often-lethal manifestation of M. tuberculosis infection. Neurological disability and developmental deficit in young children is common in survivors [1]. The poor outcome is usually due to the consequences of brain inflammation, which primarily manifests as an inflammatory infiltrate in the basal subarachnoid space of the brain, causing arachnoiditis, obliterative vasculitis, variable encephalitis, and hydrocephalus [2]. These eventually lead to raised intracranial pressure and brain ischaemia, which lead to poor outcomes. Understanding the neuroinflammatory response in TBM is thus critical in developing novel host-directed therapies.

Concentrations of inflammatory markers are higher in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) than the blood in TBM patients, suggesting compartmentalisation of the immune response at the site of disease in the central nervous system (CNS) [3, 4], although some of the cytokine burden may arise from peripheral sources. Cytokine concentrations are higher in spinal (lumbar) than ventricular CSF (VCSF), possibly due to contributions from spinal pathology and relative stagnation of CSF flow in the spinal subarachnoid space, which increases contributions from systemic sources [57]. Therefore, to understand the inflammatory process occurring in the brain itself, it is preferable to sample as close to brain tissue as possible. This is rarely possible ante-mortem and single samples do not reflect dynamic processes in the brain—temporal profiling has to date been impossible. VCSF may be more informative but high frequency repeated sampling cannot be done without breaking the sterility seal of the ventricular drainage system.

Cerebral microdialysis (MD) may offer a unique opportunity to sample the brain extracellular fluid (ECF) directly and frequently. It involves placement of a semi-permeable dialysis catheter directly in brain tissue, which enables hourly sampling of substances in the ECF over 4–5 days. This may enable high temporal resolution examination of the inflammatory processes occurring at the site of disease during the acute phase of illness.

MD monitoring has been used for various acute brain conditions requiring intensive care unit (ICU) management [8, 9]. This dynamic sampling of the brain ECF may provide a more biologically relevant picture than other fluid compartments as it measures the molecules at their sites of action and secretion [9]. Typical bedside use of MD for clinical purposes is performed by monitoring metabolic markers of energy crisis (glucose, lactate, pyruvate, glutamate) and cellular injury (glycerol) and titrating interventions based on their changes. More recently, inflammatory markers have been examined in traumatic brain injury and have been shown to be associated with outcome [1012]. Although MD has been used in several different forms of neuroinflammation [10, 13], it has not yet been applied in TBM. This pilot study aimed to investigate the feasibility of using MD to detect cytokines in brain ECF of patients with TBM.

Methods and materials

Patients presenting to the Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital with definite or probable TBM [14] who required ICU admission with ventilation and intracranial monitoring were eligible. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Patients were managed as per hospital protocol, described elsewhere [15]. MD was used as part of clinical bedside brain monitoring of brain metabolites. Remnant fluid, after bedside clinical analysis was performed, was stored for research purposes. Other routine brain monitoring included brain physiology (brain oxygenation and intracranial pressure), management of which has been previously described [16].

We reviewed the radiological findings from formal reports of brain computed tomography (CT) scans, documenting the presence and extent of infarction. We classified patients into two groups based on the characteristics of infarcts: Group A comprised patients with either focal infarcts or no infarcts; Group B comprised patients with extensive hemispheric or bilateral infarcts. We examined associations between cytokines and metabolites (lactate-pyruvate ratio, glycerol and glucose) with the two radiological groups and mortality at one year.

This study was approved by the University of Cape Town Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC 564/2012). Written informed consent was obtained from patients’ legal guardians.

Sample collection

The MD catheter, a thin, dual lumen tube with a distal semi-permeable membrane with 100kDa pore size (MDialysis, Stockholm, Sweden), was inserted into right frontal white matter. A perfusion fluid isotonic with CSF (CNS Perfusion fluid, MDialysis) was pumped at 0.3μL/min through the catheter, allowing molecules in the brain ECF to diffuse into the MD perfusate along a concentration gradient [17]. The perfusate was collected and analysed hourly at the bedside for glucose, glutamate, lactate, pyruvate and glycerol (metabolites) as part of clinical care. Remnant fluid was kept on ice and biobanked at -80ᵒC within 6 hours of collection. As MD sample volumes are typically small, hourly samples were pooled over 4-hour epochs to ensure sufficient volume for Luminex Multiplex assay analysis (>25μL). The first 2 hours of sample after the MD catheter placement was not analysed to avoid possible insertion artefacts. We examined a daily ECF sample (usually 3am to 7am) for up to 4 days from admission (the maximum duration of MD monitoring). For time-linked comparisons, we also analysed ECF samples collected at the same time as other clinically indicated procedures that sampled VCSF, lumbar CSF (LCSF) and plasma. These included blood samples, CSF sampling from an external ventricular drainage system, and/or lumbar puncture. In some patients, column tests or air encephalograms were performed to determine the level of CSF obstruction causing hydrocephalus, as per our institutional protocol [15]. This enabled simultaneous sampling of LCSF and VCSF.

Sample analysis

Samples were analysed for Growth-Regulated Oncogene (GRO), Interferon-γ (IFN-γ), Interferon-γ inducible protein-10 (IP-10), Interleukin (IL) -1β, IL-1 Receptor Antagonist (IL-1Ra), IL-6, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12p40, Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 (MCP-1), Macrophage Inflammatory Protein -1α (MIP-1α), Tumour Necrosis Factor-α (TNF-α) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) using Luminex technology on the Bio-Plex platform (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). We used a custom 13 Plex MILLIPLEX Map Human Cytokine / Chemokine Magnetic Bead Panel Kit (EMD Millipore Corporation, Billerica, MA, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions with the serum matrix as previously validated within our lab.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as median, quartiles, minimum and maximum values over the first 4 days of monitoring. Concentrations below the lower limit of detection for the kit were recorded as 0.01pg/mL for analysis. The R statistical package [18] was used to analyse data and generate figures. Due to the small cohort size and the large number of repeated measures, we did not perform statistical analysis of the relationship with radiology and clinical outcome. Rather, we highlighted variables where there was at least a 3-fold difference in cytokines and metabolites between the groups to generate hypotheses.

Results

Demographics and outcomes

Seven patients with a median age of 2.3 (range 0.6–12.6) years were enrolled. Definite TBM was diagnosed by CSF culture in 1 patient, the remaining 6 patients met the definition of probable TBM according to the published case definition [19]. All patients presented in British Medical Research Council TBM Stage 3 [20]; all were comatose and ventilated in the ICU. None was HIV co-infected. Three patients died. Few patients had LCSF samples available for analysis in the first few days of hospitalisation, therefore, VCSF measurements are reported (all patients had external ventricular drainage for hydrocephalus). VCSF is known to be different from LCSF, the latter of which is more commonly reported for TBM [3]. Brain computed tomography (CT) scans showed typical features, namely hydrocephalus, basal meningeal enhancement, and infarcts in all patients (n = 7). Two patients had clinically indicated spinal magnetic resonance imaging, which demonstrated spinal disease in both. Four patients showed features of pulmonary TB on chest radiographs. Demographic-, clinical admission features, admission chemistry- and imaging- characteristics are summarised in Table 1.

Table 1. Demographic, admission clinical, admission chemistry and imaging characteristics.

Characteristic Value
Demographic characteristics
    Age, years 2.3 (0.7–12.6)
    Sex
        Male 5 (71)
Clinical characteristics
    Fever 4 (57)
    Altered level of consciousness 7 (100)
    Focal neurology 6 (86)
    Seizures 5 (71)
    Meningism 1 (14)
    HIV infection 0 (0)
    Immunisations up to date 3 (43)
Surgery performed
    EVD insertion 7 (100)
    VPS insertion 3 (43)
Diagnostics
    CSF Culture Positive 1 (14)
Outcome
    Mortality 3 (43)
VCSF Chemistry
    Glucose (mmol/L) 3.7 (1.5–4.6)
    Chloride (mmol/L) 112 (93–124)
    Protein (g/L) 0.57 (0.27–1.35)
VCSF Cells
    Polymorphonucleocytes (cells/μL) 6 (0–37)
    Lymphocytes (cells/μL) 18 (6–45)
    WCC (cells/μL) 38 (7–58)
Imaging Data
    Hydrocephalus 7(100)
    Enhancement 7(100)
    Tuberculoma 0(0)
    Spinal Disease (n = 2) 2 (100)
    Infarcts 7 (100)
    Chest X-ray suggestive of PTB 4 (57)

Data presented as median (range) or n (%). Imaging data from all in-hospital scans. Only 2 patients were assessed for spinal disease on imaging. VCSF obtained on admission. Abbreviations: EVD, external ventricular drain; VPS, ventriculoperitoneal shunt; VCSF, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid; WCC, White Cell Count.

Inflammatory markers in ECF

Summaries of the ECF data are presented in S1 Table and Fig 1. As per clinical indications for MD, which determined duration of monitoring, ECF samples were available for 5 epochs (Admission; Day 1–4) in 6 patients, and only 3 epochs (Admission; Day 1–2) in patient 7.

Fig 1. Distributions of inflammatory marker concentrations recovered from brain extracellular fluid.

Fig 1

All microdialysis concentration values plotted for each of the 13 markers (n = 33) overall (not parsed by time point or by patient). Points plotted in a quasi-random fashion horizontally to avoid over-plotting. Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; GRO, growth-regulated oncogene; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, interleukin-1 receptor antagonist; IP-10, interferon-γ inducible protein-10; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor.

Inflammatory markers GRO, IFN-γ, IP-10, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, MIP-1α, TNF-α and VEGF were all detected in at least 1 time point in the ECF overall. IL-10 and IL-12p40 were below the kit’s lowest detectable limit for all time points. Relative to the other analytes, MCP-1 consistently showed the highest median concentrations in ECF at each timepoint, IP-10 showed the second highest concentrations for the first 4 time points, and IL-1Ra’s median concentration was highest on the final day of monitoring (Day 4). Median GRO, MIP-1α and TNF-α was usually below the detection limit for all days analysed. Temporal profiles varied across patients as demonstrated for MCP-1 in Fig 2.

Fig 2. Temporal concentrations of inflammatory markers recovered through microdialysis monitoring.

Fig 2

Concentrations (pg/mL) of inflammatory marker MCP-1 recovered from brain ECF obtained through microdialysis monitoring. Patient numbers were arbitrarily assigned. Patient lines are not visible where another is plotted directly on top of it (e.g. both patient’s values remain at baseline). Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein.

There were no obvious differences in the ECF concentrations of patients who survived relative to those who died. However, this study was not powered for an outcome analysis.

Examination of cytokine spikes with ECF metabolic data for individual patients

Time-linked spikes in cytokine concentrations were seen in several patients. To explore the relationship between cytokines and other parameters we examined the time-linked inflammatory, metabolic, and physiological data in individual patients. In patient 2, the spike seen in several cytokines including IL-6 and MIP-1α on day 1 of monitoring occurred simultaneously with a sharp rise in ECF glycerol, a marker of cell membrane breakdown (Fig 3A). Progressive or secondary increases in glycerol may denote ongoing or evolving secondary injury. For patient 6, a spike in inflammatory markers GRO and IL-8 on day 3 coincided with a steady increase in ECF glycerol and a rise in the lactate/pyruvate ratio (from 20 to 40) with critically low brain oxygen levels (<10 mmHg), both of which were in keeping with brain ischaemia (Fig 3B). In Patient 5 a spike in inflammatory markers on the final day of monitoring (Day 4) coincided with the lowest brain glucose concentrations for the monitoring period and intermittent decreases in brain oxygenation (Fig 3C).

Fig 3. Inflammatory marker spikes time-linked with metabolic data.

Fig 3

(A) Patient 2. (A1) Representative inflammatory markers illustrating a temporally linked spike in MIP-1α and IL-6 concentrations on Day 1 in the ECF. (A2) Glycerol concentrations in the ECF of patient 2 which show a peak without a rapid subsequent decline, indicating ongoing injury. (Glycerol is a marker of cellular injury). The time-period during which the Day 1 ECF sample was obtained is shown by the yellow rectangle. (B) Patient 6. (B1) Representative inflammatory markers showing temporally linked spike in GRO and IL-8 concentrations on Day 3 in the ECF. (B2) Upper panel: Glycerol concentrations in the ECF of patient 6. The time-period during which the Day 3 ECF sample was obtained is shown by the yellow rectangle and follows a rise in glycerol. Glycerol levels do not decrease thereafter, indicating ongoing injury. The lower panel shows the brain tissue oxygen monitoring including the time period during which the sample was taken (normal brain oxygen is greater than 20mmHg; 10mmHg is a critical threshold for brain hypoxia). (C) Patient 5. (C1) Representative inflammatory markers showing temporally linked spike in GRO and TNF-α concentrations on Day 4 in the ECF. (C2) Upper panel: Glucose concentrations in the ECF of patient 5. The time-period during which the Day 4 ECF sample was obtained is shown by the yellow rectangle and is associated with the low glucose concentration. The lower panel shows the corresponding fluctuation in the brain tissue oxygen monitoring including the time period during which the sample was taken (normal brain oxygen is greater than 20mmHg; 10mmHg is a critical threshold for brain hypoxia). Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; GRO, growth-regulated oncogene; IL-6, interleukin-6; IL-8, interleukin-8; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α.

Recovery of cytokines in different fluid compartments

VCSF samples were the second most abundant (n = 9) in our dataset and were available for 5 of our patients. Time-linked sample analysis showed lower concentrations in ECF than the VCSF in general (Fig 4). This difference was less clear for IL-1β, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and IL-1Ra, which displayed concentrations that were comparable or even higher than their paired VCSF samples in some patients. In patients who also had time-linked LCSF samples (n = 3) recorded, concentrations tended towards being highest in the LCSF, followed by VCSF, and then ECF (S1 Fig). S2 Fig summarises how the plasma samples compare to their corresponding VCSF and ECF samples, where available (n = 3).

Fig 4. Paired brain extracellular and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid cytokine concentrations.

Fig 4

Each VCSF sample analysed (n = 9) is plotted with its paired ECF which was obtained from the same patient at the same time point. Plotted values have been shifted horizontally to avoid over-plotting. Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; GRO, growth-regulated oncogene; IFN-γ, interferon-γ; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; IP-10, interferon-γ inducible peptide; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VCSF, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.

Associations of MD cytokines and metabolites with radiological and clinical outcome

There were 33 cytokine samples in total and 459 metabolite samples in 7 patients. Two patients demonstrated extensive or bilateral infarction (Group B); 5 patients demonstrated focal [n = 4] or no infarction [n = 1] (Group A). Three patients had died at one year follow up; 4 survivours all achieved a good functional outcome. The relevant values are shown in S2 and S3 Tables.

Radiology

For cytokines:

  1. Median cytokine concentrations in Group B were greater than or equal to corresponding values in Group A for all cytokines.

  2. Cytokines that demonstrated median concentrations at least 3-fold greater: IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, and MCP-1 (in Group B).

For metabolites:

Median glycerol concentrations were 3-fold greater in Group B; the lactate-pyruvate ratio was slightly higher and glucose was slightly lower.

Clinical outcome

For cytokines:

  1. Median cytokine concentrations in patients who died were greater than or equal to corresponding values in survivours for all cytokines, except IL-6.

  2. Cytokines that demonstrated median concentrations at least 3-fold greater: IL-1β and MCP-1 (in patients who died).

For metabolites:

Median glycerol concentrations were 3-fold greater in patients who died; the lactate-pyruvate ratio was slightly higher, and glucose was slightly lower.

Discussion

This pilot study demonstrated the feasibility of 1) detecting a range of inflammatory markers in brain ECF of paediatric TBM patients using MD monitoring, and 2) describing temporal changes in ECF cytokine concentrations over several days. These patterns may associate with the physiological state of the patient, as manifest by corresponding changes in brain chemistry and brain oxygenation. However, the sample size is small, and this requires validation in a larger cohort. Concentrations in samples may be affected by relative recovery rates and anatomical location of catheter placement; however, it offers a potentially useful method for tracking changes over time and in response to conventional or novel therapies.

Recovery of inflammatory markers using cerebral microdialysis

This is the first time that molecules in brain ECF were examined in TBM. Cytokines were in some cases below the lower limit of detection. This mirrors what is seen in traumatic brain injury in a paper by Helmy et al. [11], whose examination included the same cytokines in our study and which similarly showed MCP-1 and IP-10 to be the highest cytokines.

Several factors might affect the recovery of molecules from brain ECF, including placement of the catheter, the relative recovery for a particular molecule, the type of perfusion fluid and flow rate, insertion artefact, occasional local haemorrhage around the probe, and bio-fouling of the catheter by brain particles and blood [11, 2123]. However, in this cohort the MD catheters were placed under direct vision, subsequent imaging confirmed correct position, initial ECF samples were discarded and there were no focal haemorrhages. The low analyte concentrations in our data could, therefore reflect a) that the molecule was not present in the ECF, although this is less likely given that those analytes were present in the VCSF, b) it was not detected due to insufficient sensitivity of the analysis kit for low concentrations or c) the relative recovery of the molecule through the microdialysis testing modality was insufficient to detect low concentrations. The use of dextran or albumin as a perfusion fluid may have increased the yield [24, 25]. It is promising, however, to be able to generate pilot data on ECF cytokine concentrations in TBM.

Temporal profile

The temporal profiles over the course of monitoring were mixed across patients. This contrasts to what has been found in traumatic brain injury [11], and may reflect different pathophysiological dynamics; however, the sample size of this study was small.

It is noteworthy that the spikes observed in the ECF cytokine concentrations coincided with changes in ECF glycerol, ECF glucose, lactate-pyruvate ratio, or brain oxygen. Glycerol is a component of the cell membrane and elevated levels are considered to be associated with brain cell damage and membrane breakdown that may be due to ischaemia [26] and tissue injury [27]. This may also manifest as low brain oxygenation and an increased lactate/pyruvate ratio (a marker of perturbed glucose metabolism). Ischaemia occurs commonly in TBM, often even after starting full therapy, and drives poor patient outcomes, but we still do not have a full understanding of what causes this progression and how it evolves in individual patients. These data may offer insight into the disease processes occurring, and the immediacy of the negative impact on the brain. It may also help determine the cerebral response of the disease to novel therapies.

Compartmental differences

The compartmental comparisons between the VCSF and ECF (n = 9 paired samples) yielded interesting differences. Most cytokines showed higher concentrations in the VCSF, which may reflect true differences [9] or the reduced relative recovery through the MD catheter. The relative variation between ratios of different cytokines, though, suggest that at least some compartmental effects exist, given the static physico-chemical properties of the MD membrane. It is worth noting that MIP-1α and MCP-1 showed relatively high concentrations when compared to the VCSF compartment, potentially suggesting greater expression in the brain. Further interpretation of this is not possible due to the small number of paired samples. The differences in cytokine concentrations between time-linked LCSF and VCSF samples also support our previous work demonstrating CNS compartmental differences [3].

Associations with clinical and radiological outcome

Although the sample size is small, the data suggest some intriguing hypotheses that require examination in a larger cohort. In general, cytokine values were greater in patients who died, and who experienced extensive infarction. In particular, IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, and MCP-1 showed 3-fold higher values in patients with extensive infarction; for patients who died, IL-1β was 3-fold greater and MCP-1 showed just less than a 3-fold difference (S2 Table).

Metabolites showed less marked differences, but glycerol was 3-fold greater in patients who died and patients who developed extensive or bilateral infarction, which may be in keeping with tissue destruction (S3 Table).

These observations require validation in a larger cohort, but suggest there may be differences in the brain cytokine and metabolic profile in patients who develop more severe disease. Patients who do not respond to therapy are arguably the key group for whom new approaches are urgently needed. Importantly, we have demonstrated that cytokines and metabolites can be tracked in real-time. This can be extended to observe responses to treatment: because MD allows repeated measures over several days, it may be a method to attempt targeted immunomodulation in the acute phase of the disease in clinical trials, because it enables quantifiable measures of the intervention’s effect.

Limitations

The sample size for this study was small and the results need validation in a larger cohort. Although we examined the temporal profile of cytokines, we were limited to single daily samples because of the small hourly sample volumes and the use of samples for other studies. Higher frequency monitoring is possible and may be useful given that clinical experience in TBM suggests that pathophysiological events such as seizures and infarction can occur rapidly in a patient’s time course. Although we elected to examine daily samples and selected time-linked samples, up to 6 samples a day is possible if pooling over a 4-hour epoch was used.

A limitation of MD is the relative recovery of molecules and the difficulty of calibrating the catheter in vivo. A further limitation of the technique is the potential difficulty in extrapolating data from the small area of microdialysis monitored brain to the inflammatory state of the entire brain [28]. However, TBM induces a diffuse inflammatory process [29] and the area of MD sampling may be generalisable to the brain as a whole. The important observation is that over the first 4–5 days of monitoring this appears to be a stable methodology that can track the time course of relative concentrations of substances [30]. While it has been suggested that the invasive nature of the MD catheter may itself cause local inflammation that confounds results [31], varying patterns observed in different cerebral pathologies [32, 33] and different patients [34] suggest catheter insertion alone is not responsible for the readings and that after the first hour after insertion the readings are stable. Catheter function over the monitoring time period used in this study is unlikely to be influenced by local disruptions from biofouling, encapsulation or bleeding [11].

This study cohort was biased towards the most severe spectrum of disease, as only very ill patients needed ventilation and intracranial monitoring. Most patients already had infarcts present on their initial scan. Therefore, the data may not generalise to all patients with TBM. Finally, we could not examine for associations with intracranial pressure because patients were undergoing ventricular CSF drainage.

Despite these limitations, this project is the first attempt to analyse inflammatory mediators in brain ECF in patients with TBM, the closest samples to the site of disease in vivo, and offers insight into acute cytokine profiles early in treatment, and their immediate response to pathophysiological events. Additionally, while MD may not be used to directly compare cytokine concentrations between compartments or elucidate exact concentrations, relative changes over time can offer valuable temporal evolution data. Further research in a larger cohort, possibly using higher sensitivity analysis methods such mass spectrometry, could elucidate valuable processes occurring in the early, and most critical, part of the disease. This may help develop novel therapies and allow us to track the cerebral response to these.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated feasibility in detecting inflammatory mediators in brain ECF and their temporal profile in patients with TBM using MD. Despite the limitations, it represents a promising platform to examine disease evolution and possibly the cerebral response to therapies.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Paired brain extracellular, ventricular cerebrospinal and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid cytokine concentrations.

Each LCSF sample analysed (n = 3) is plotted with its paired ECF and VCSF which were obtained from the same patient at the same time point. Plotted values have been shifted horizontally to avoid overplotting. Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; IP-10, interferon-γ inducible protein-10; LCSF, lumbar cerebrospinal fluid; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VCSF, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Paired brain extracellular fluid, plasma, and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory marker concentrations.

Each plasma sample analysed had both a paired ECF and VCSF which were obtained from the same patient at the same time point (n = 3 cases). Plotted values have been shifted horizontally to avoid overplotting. Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; IP-10, interferon-γ inducible protein-10; LCSF, lumbar cerebrospinal fluid; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VCSF, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.

(TIF)

S1 Table. Paired brain extracellular fluid and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid cytokine concentrations.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Cytokine differences between radiological outcome and mortality.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Metabolite differences between radiological outcome and mortality.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the included patients and their guardians. They acknowledge the neurosurgeons at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital for sample collection and the Neurosurgery Research Group who assisted with sample collection, processing, and storage. They also thank the nurses at Red Cross War Memorial Children’s Hospital Cape Town for their assistance with the microdialysis monitoring.

Data Availability

All relevant data are uploaded to the University of Cape Town's Open Data repository ZivaHub and publicly accessible via the following URL: https://doi.org/10.25375/uct.13807943.v1.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by the National Research Foundation SARChI Chair of Clinical Neurosciences, Harry Crossley Foundation and South African Medical Research Council, National Medical Students Research Training Programme received by Nicholas Loxton. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, van Crevel R, Mai NTH, Dooley KE, et al. Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(10):581–98. 10.1038/nrneurol.2017.120 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Davis AG, Rohlwink UK, Proust A, Figaji AA, Wilkinson RJ. The pathogenesis of tuberculous meningitis. J Leukoc Biol. 2019;105(2):267–80. 10.1002/JLB.MR0318-102R [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rohlwink UK, Mauff K, Wilkinson KA, Enslin N, Wegoye E, Wilkinson RJ, et al. Biomarkers of Cerebral Injury and Inflammation in Pediatric Tuberculous Meningitis. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;65(8):1298–307. 10.1093/cid/cix540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Thwaites GE, Simmons CP, Than Ha Quyen N, Thi Hong Chau T, Phuong Mai P, Thi Dung N, et al. Pathophysiology and prognosis in vietnamese adults with tuberculous meningitis. J Infect Dis. 2003;188(8):1105–15. 10.1086/378642 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rohlwink UK, Kilborn T, Wieselthaler N, Banderker E, Zwane E, Figaji AA. Imaging Features of the Brain, Cerebral Vessels and Spine in Pediatric Tuberculous Meningitis With Associated Hydrocephalus. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2016;35(10):e301–10. 10.1097/INF.0000000000001236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reiber H. Dynamics of brain-derived proteins in cerebrospinal fluid. Clin Chim Acta. 2001;310(2):173–86. 10.1016/s0009-8981(01)00573-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Reiber H. Proteins in cerebrospinal fluid and blood: Barriers, CSF flow rate and source-related dynamics. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2003;21(3,4,):79–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Schulz MK, Wang LP, Tange M, Bjerre T. Cerebral microdialysis monitoring: determination of normal and ischemic cerebral metabolisms in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Neurosurg. 2000;93(5):808–14. 10.3171/jns.2000.93.5.0808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Helmy A, De Simoni MG, Guilfoyle MR, Carpenter KL, Hutchinson PJ. Cytokines and innate inflammation in the pathogenesis of human traumatic brain injury. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;95(3):352–72. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hillered L, Dahlin AP, Clausen F, Chu J, Bergquist J, Hjort K, et al. Cerebral microdialysis for protein biomarker monitoring in the neurointensive care setting—a technical approach. Front Neurol. 2014;5:245. 10.3389/fneur.2014.00245 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Helmy A, Carpenter KLH, Menon DK, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJA. The cytokine response to human traumatic brain injury: temporal profiles and evidence for cerebral parenchymal production. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2011;31(2):658–70. 10.1038/jcbfm.2010.142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hutchinson PJ, O’Connell MT, Rothwell NJ, Hopkins SJ, Nortje J, Carpenter KL, et al. Inflammation in human brain injury: intracerebral concentrations of IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, and their endogenous inhibitor IL-1ra. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(10):1545–57. 10.1089/neu.2007.0295 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tabatabaei P, Visse E, Bergström P, Brännström T, Siesjö P, Bergenheim AT. Radiotherapy induces an immediate inflammatory reaction in malignant glioma: a clinical microdialysis study. J Neurooncol. 2017;131(1):83–92. 10.1007/s11060-016-2271-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Marais S, Thwaites G, Schoeman JF, Török ME, Misra UK, Prasad K, et al. Tuberculous meningitis: a uniform case definition for use in clinical research. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2010;10(11):803–12. 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70138-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Figaji AA, Fieggen AG. The neurosurgical and acute care management of tuberculous meningitis: evidence and current practice. Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2010;90(6):393–400. 10.1016/j.tube.2010.09.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Figaji A, Sandler SI, Fieggen AG, Le Roux P, Peter JC, Argent A. Continuous monitoring and intervention for cerebral ischemia in tuberculous meningitis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008;9:e25–e30. 10.1097/PCC.0b013e318172e8b7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ao X, Stenken JA. Microdialysis sampling of cytokines. Methods. 2006;38(4):331–41. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2005.11.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Marais BJ, Heemskerk AD, Marais SS, van Crevel R, Rohlwink U, Caws M, et al. Standardized Methods for Enhanced Quality and Comparability of Tuberculous Meningitis Studies. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64(4):501–9. 10.1093/cid/ciw757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.van Toorn R, Springer P, Laubscher JA, Schoeman JF. Value of different staging systems for predicting neurological outcome in childhood tuberculous meningitis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2012;16(5):628–32. 10.5588/ijtld.11.0648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Benveniste H, Diemer NH. Cellular reactions to implantation of a microdialysis tube in the rat hippocampus. Acta Neuropathol. 1987;74(3):234–8. 10.1007/BF00688186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Woodroofe MN, Sarna GS, Wadhwa M, Hayes GM, Loughlin AJ, Tinker A, et al. Detection of interleukin-1 and interleukin-6 in adult rat brain, following mechanical injury, by in vivo microdialysis: evidence of a role for microglia in cytokine production. J Neuroimmunol. 1991;33(3):227–36. 10.1016/0165-5728(91)90110-s [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Folkersma H, Breve JJ, Tilders FJ, Cherian L, Robertson CS, Vandertop WP. Cerebral microdialysis of interleukin (IL)-1beta and IL-6: extraction efficiency and production in the acute phase after severe traumatic brain injury in rats. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2008;150(12):1277–84; discussion 84. 10.1007/s00701-008-0151-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Giorgi-Coll S, Thelin EP, Lindblad C, Tajsic T, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJA, et al. Dextran 500 Improves Recovery of Inflammatory Markers: An In Vitro Microdialysis Study. J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(1):106–14. 10.1089/neu.2019.6513 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Helmy A, Carpenter KL, Skepper JN, Kirkpatrick PJ, Pickard JD, Hutchinson PJ. Microdialysis of cytokines: methodological considerations, scanning electron microscopy, and determination of relative recovery. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26(4):549–61. 10.1089/neu.2008.0719 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Frykholm P, Hillered L, Långström B, Persson L, Valtysson J, Watanabe Y, et al. Increase of interstitial glycerol reflects the degree of ischaemic brain damage: a PET and microdialysis study in a middle cerebral artery occlusion-reperfusion primate model. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry . 2001;71(4):455–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Clausen T, Alves OL, Reinert M, Doppenberg E, Zauner A, Bullock R. Association between elevated brain tissue glycerol levels and poor outcome following severe traumatic brain injury. 2005;103(2):233. 10.3171/jns.2005.103.2.0233 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Thelin EP, Carpenter KLH, Hutchinson PJ, Helmy A. Microdialysis Monitoring in Clinical Traumatic Brain Injury and Its Role in Neuroprotective Drug Development. The AAPS Journal. 2017;19(2):367–76. 10.1208/s12248-016-0027-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Özateş M, Kemalogˇlu S, Gürkan F, Özkan Ü, Hoşogˇlu S, Şimşek MM. CT OF THE BRAIN IN TUBERCULOUS MENINGITIS. Acta Radiol. 2000;41(1):13–7. 10.1034/j.1600-0455.2000.041001013.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Helmy A, Carpenter KL, Hutchinson P. Microdialysis in the human brain and its potential role in the development and clinical assessment of drugs. Curr Med Chem. 2007;14(14):1525–37. 10.2174/092986707780831113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stenken JA, Church MK, Gill CA, Clough GF. How Minimally Invasive is Microdialysis Sampling? A Cautionary Note for Cytokine Collection in Human Skin and other Clinical Studies. The AAPS Journal. 2010;12(1):73–8. 10.1208/s12248-009-9163-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mellergard P, Aneman O, Sjogren F, Saberg C, Hillman J. Differences in cerebral extracellular response of interleukin-1beta, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10 after subarachnoid hemorrhage or severe head trauma in humans. Neurosurgery. 2011;68(1):12–9; discussion 9. 10.1227/NEU.0b013e3181ef2a40 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mellergård P, Sjögren F, Hillman J. Release of VEGF and FGF in the extracellular space following severe subarachnoidal haemorrhage or traumatic head injury in humans. Br J Neurosurg. 2010;24(3):276–82. 10.3109/02688690903521605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hillman J, Åneman O, Persson M, Andersson C, Dabrosin C, Mellergård P. Variations in the response of interleukins in neurosurgical intensive care patients monitored using intracerebral microdialysis. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(5):820–5. 10.3171/jns.2007.106.5.820 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Richard Bruce Mink

12 Nov 2020

PONE-D-20-25771

A pilot study of inflammatory mediators in brain extracellular fluid in paediatric TBM

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Figaji,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please be sure to respond to the issues raised by Reviewer #2. In particular, can you correlate the findings with measurement of ICP or metabolic factors? 

Please submit your revised manuscript by Dec 27 2020 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Richard Bruce Mink

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. We note that you have stated that you will provide repository information for your data at acceptance. Should your manuscript be accepted for publication, we will hold it until you provide the relevant accession numbers or DOIs necessary to access your data. If you wish to make changes to your Data Availability statement, please describe these changes in your cover letter and we will update your Data Availability statement to reflect the information you provide.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

This work is supported by the National Research Foundation SARChI Chair of Clinical

361 Neurosciences grant held by A.F.

362 N.W.L. received financial support from a Harry Crossley Research Fellowship and by

363 the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its Division of

364 Research Capacity Development under the National Medical Students Research

19

Training Programme from funding received from the South 365 African National Treasury.

366 The content hereof is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily

367 represent the official views of the SAMRC or the funders.

i) We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

ii) Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

 "The author(s) received no specific funding for this work".

 

iii) Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: N/A

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Very well done pilot study on inflammatory mediators in brain ECF in TBM. It would be interesting to see how inflammatory markers would help in identifying or treating patients with TBM to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. This pilot study might assist patients in developing nations where TB is prevalent and causes significant morbidity and mortality. Having said that techniques like MD are available only in tertiary centers, so co-relation between brain ECF and blood markers can be used as indirect co-markers in underdeveloped nations. Overall, very good study, need to see how markers trend in large set of patient population.

Reviewer #2: The article seeks to explore microdialysis fluid as a source for analysis. This is the main aim of the article. It is written appropriately and tests done well.

It additionally measured cytokines in 7 TBM patients; all severe (1 definite, 6 probable). Note CSF glucose (normal) and protein (slightly elevated) were of uncertain origin (ventricular or lumbar)

The findings are referable to the brain area samples as local stress may cause membrane breakdown with associated cytokine change as eco0rede. As this is microdialysis fluid and focal area of abnormality may occur in TBM such as ischemia, the finding is not generalizable to the whole brain unless in the absence of local pathology and related to a systemic process such as raised ICP or general hypoxia for instance.

Thus the cytokine data is of little clinical value in this study. Longitudinal measurements across may time points over days may yield more useful information, particularly correlated to circulatory, metabolic and ICP measures.

Thus although microdialysis fluid may be used for analysis its value and utility still needs elaboration.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Sreenath Meegada MD MPH FACP

Reviewer #2: No

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0246997. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246997.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Dec 2020

We thank the reviewers for the careful assessment of our manuscript and the editorial team for the opportunity to submit a revised version of our manuscript PONE-D-20-25771 A pilot study of inflammatory mediators in brain extracellular fluid in paediatric TBM. We appreciate the supportive comments and below we address the issues raised.

Response to editorial comments:

1. The manuscript has been formatted as per PLOS ONE requirements.

2. Once the manuscript has been formally accepted we will deposit the data in ZivaHub and provide the reference details.

3. We have removed any funding statements from the manuscript, please kindly update our funding statement to include: “This work is supported by the National Research Foundation SARChI Chair of Clinical Neurosciences grant held by A.F.

N.W.L. received financial support from a Harry Crossley Research Fellowship and by the South African Medical Research Council (SAMRC) through its Division of Research Capacity Development under the National Medical Students Research Training Programme from funding received from the South African National Treasury. The content hereof is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the SAMRC or the funders.”

Response to Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer #1: Very well done pilot study on inflammatory mediators in brain ECF in TBM. It would be interesting to see how inflammatory markers would help in identifying or treating patients with TBM to prevent significant morbidity and mortality. This pilot study might assist patients in developing nations where TB is prevalent and causes significant morbidity and mortality. Having said that techniques like MD are available only in tertiary centers, so co-relation between brain ECF and blood markers can be used as indirect co-markers in underdeveloped nations. Overall, very good study, need to see how markers trend in large set of patient population.

Response: We thank the reviewer for their complimentary assessment of our manuscript. We agree that MD is unlikely to be feasible in underdeveloped nations, and we do not intend to promote its use for this purpose. Our aim is to develop pilot data to determine whether MD is feasible and could be a tool which, in addition to having clinical value, also enables the real-time longitudinal study of the brain to examine its response to clinical interventions, especially in advanced centers and in clinical trials. If this is successful we can propose possible underlying mechanisms of action and support the development of clinical trials of specific interventions. We agree that further investigation in a larger cohort will be important in determining its use in this context.

Reviewer #2: The article seeks to explore microdialysis fluid as a source for analysis. This is the main aim of the article. It is written appropriately and tests done well.

It additionally measured cytokines in 7 TBM patients; all severe (1 definite, 6 probable). Note CSF glucose (normal) and protein (slightly elevated) were of uncertain origin (ventricular or lumbar).

Response: We thank the reviewer for their comments. We would like to draw their attention to line 142 of the Results section and to Table 1 in which we state that ventricular CSF data are presented due to limited availability of lumbar CSF for this cohort of patients. These patients alll were in the intensive care unit and had ventricular CSF drainage. We highlight this because of the relatively mild CSF changes as opposed to typical lumbar CSF findings.

The findings are referable to the brain area samples as local stress may cause membrane breakdown with associated cytokine change as eco0rede. As this is microdialysis fluid and focal area of abnormality may occur in TBM such as ischemia, the finding is not generalizable to the whole brain unless in the absence of local pathology and related to a systemic process such as raised ICP or general hypoxia for instance.

Thus the cytokine data is of little clinical value in this study. Longitudinal measurements across may time points over days may yield more useful information, particularly correlated to circulatory, metabolic and ICP measures.

Thus although microdialysis fluid may be used for analysis its value and utility still needs elaboration.

Response: We thank the reviewer for the insightful comment. He/she is correct in stating that microdialysis – like any focal monitoring tool – measures a limited area of the brain; therefore the results may not be generalizable to other areas of the brain. We acknowledge as much in the limitations sections of our manuscript. Based on our experience though – and the global community of specialists involved in advanced neurocritical care – focal monitoring often does detect insults that the whole brain is subjected to. This is our experience also with brain tissue oxygen monitoring, with which we now have experience in almost 300 patients and which mirrors our experience with TBM. The hypothesis is that even though certain focal areas develop infarction, the insult to the brain is often much more widespread (because it is due to increased ICP, hypoxia, or hypotension), and the areas that eventually infarct tend to be in perforator territories that are most vulnerable. This is also consistent with our observation over several years of brain tissue oxygen monitoring in TBM patients where traditional intracranial pressure thresholds may not be applicable because of the underlying vasculitis (being prepared for publication). In these patients, general measures such as intracranial pressure reduction, increased blood pressure and increased systemic oxygenation result are demonstrate in the focal region of examination.

We agree fully though, that these are complicated questions and hypotheses, and the clinical and research role of these tools still require elucidation. This is precisely what we are aiming to do, and this manuscript is part of that process.

We also agree with the reviewer’s comment that the longitudinal examination of these changes over time may yield better information than single values in absolute terms, which we address in the Discussion.

The reviewer specifically mentions the possible association with other measures, such as intracranial pressure and metabolites. We did not do this anlaysis as part of the original manuscript because the patient cohort was small and any statistical analysis would meaningless given the need to adjust for repeated measures. However, in response to the question we have performed a preliminary hypothesis-generating analysis of the cytokines and metabolites in association with radiological and clinical outcome. We could not analyse against intracranial pressure because these patients had ventricular drainage set to normalize the pressure.

We proceeded to analyse radiological features, clinical outcome and metabolites. We reviewed the radiological findings from formal reports of brain computed tomography (CT) scans. In our previous work, we demonstrated that simple classification according to the presence or absence of infarcts alone is not as predictive as might be expected, possibly because infarcts vary substantially in size and location, both of which have important implications for death or disability. Also, 6 of the 7 patients developed infarcts. So we classified patients into two groups based on the characteristics of infarcts: Group A comprised patients with either focal infarcts or no infarcts; Group B comprised patients with extensive hemispheric or bilateral infarcts.

Because the patient cohort was so small and the analysis was preliminary, we felt that group statistics would be unreliable. Any attempt to do so would be meaningless given the small size and the necessary adjustment for repeated measures testing. To generate hypotheses, we highlighted differences in brain cytokines or metabolites in which there was at least a 3-fold difference between groups.

Clinical outcome was mortality at one year follow up.

Metabolites were examined from hourly analysis on the bedside Mdialysis analyzer.

Infarct Group A and B

There were 5 patients in Group A and two patients in Group B (extensive and/ or bilateral infarction).

For cytokines:

1) Median cytokine values in Group B were greater than or equal to corresponding values in Group A for all cytokines.

2) Cytokines that demonstrated median values at least 3-fold greater: IL-1β, IL-1Ra, IL-6, and MCP-1 (in Group B).

For metabolites:

Median glycerol values were 3-fold greater in Group B (145.79 versus 40.28); the lactate-pyruvate ratio was slightly higher (24.24 versus 19.51), and glucose was slightly lower (0.61 versus 1.19).

Clinical Outcome

For clinical outcome, patients were classified as dead (3 patients) or alive (4 patients). All survivours achieved a good functional outcome at one year follow up.

For cytokines:

1) Median cytokine values in patients who died were greater than or equal to corresponding values in survivours for all cytokines, except Il6.

2) Cytokines that demonstrated median values at least 3-fold greater: Il1B and MCP1 (in patients who died).

For metabolites:

Median glycerol values were 3 fold greater in patients who died (76.03 versus 24.62); the lactate-pyruvate ratio was slightly higher (23.43 versus 19.23), glucose was slightly lower (0.93 versus 1.14).

We have added the relevant text above to the Methods and Results sections (see track changes) along with Tables S2 and S3.

We have added the following to the Discussion

‘Although the sample size is small, the data suggest some intriguing hypotheses that require examination in a larger cohort. In general, cytokine values were greater in patients who died, and who experienced extensive infarction. In particular, Il1B, Il1Ra, Il6, and MCP1 showed 3-fold higher values in patients with extensive infarction; for patients who died, Il1B and MCP1 were 3-fold greater.

Metabolites showed less marked differences, but glycerol was 3-fold greater in patients who died and patients who developed extensive or bilateral infarction, which may be in keeping with tissue destruction.

These observations require validation in a larger cohort, but suggest there may be differences in the brain cytokine and metabolic profile in patients who develop more severe disease. Patients who do not respond to therapy are arguably the key group for whom new approaches are urgently needed. Importantly, we have demonstrated that cytokines and metabolites can be tracked in real-time. This can be extended to observe responses to treatment: because MD allows repeated measures over several days, it may be a method to attempt targeted immunomodulation in the acute phase of the disease, because it enables quantifiable measures of the intervention’s effect.’

Once again, we thank the editor and reviewers for their comments and opportunity to strengthen the manuscript. We hope that it is now acceptable for publication.

Decision Letter 1

Richard Bruce Mink

1 Feb 2021

A pilot study of inflammatory mediators in brain extracellular fluid in paediatric TBM

PONE-D-20-25771R1

Dear Dr. Figaji,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Richard Bruce Mink

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: The authours have addressed commnets and adjusted teh limitations to reflect teh value ofteh article. The conclusion appropriately limits itself to the technique suggeted.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: No

Acceptance letter

Richard Bruce Mink

4 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-25771R1

A pilot study of inflammatory mediators in brain extracellular fluid in paediatric TBM

Dear Dr. Figaji:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Richard Bruce Mink

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Paired brain extracellular, ventricular cerebrospinal and lumbar cerebrospinal fluid cytokine concentrations.

    Each LCSF sample analysed (n = 3) is plotted with its paired ECF and VCSF which were obtained from the same patient at the same time point. Plotted values have been shifted horizontally to avoid overplotting. Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; IP-10, interferon-γ inducible protein-10; LCSF, lumbar cerebrospinal fluid; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VCSF, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.

    (TIF)

    S2 Fig. Paired brain extracellular fluid, plasma, and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid inflammatory marker concentrations.

    Each plasma sample analysed had both a paired ECF and VCSF which were obtained from the same patient at the same time point (n = 3 cases). Plotted values have been shifted horizontally to avoid overplotting. Abbreviations: ECF, extracellular fluid; IFN-γ, interferon γ; IL, interleukin; IL-1Ra, interleukin 1 receptor antagonist; IP-10, interferon-γ inducible protein-10; LCSF, lumbar cerebrospinal fluid; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein; MIP-1α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1α; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VCSF, ventricular cerebrospinal fluid.

    (TIF)

    S1 Table. Paired brain extracellular fluid and ventricular cerebrospinal fluid cytokine concentrations.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Cytokine differences between radiological outcome and mortality.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Metabolite differences between radiological outcome and mortality.

    (DOCX)

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are uploaded to the University of Cape Town's Open Data repository ZivaHub and publicly accessible via the following URL: https://doi.org/10.25375/uct.13807943.v1.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES