Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 13.
Published in final edited form as: Dev Med Child Neurol. 2020 May 10;62(8):926–932. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.14559

Effect of pain on mood affective disorders in adults with cerebral palsy

Daniel G Whitney 1,2, Sarah Bell 1, Daniel Whibley 1,3, Wilma MA van der Slot 4,5, Edward A Hurvitz 1, Heidi Haapala 1, Mark D Peterson 1,2, Seth A Warschausky 1
PMCID: PMC7955588  NIHMSID: NIHMS1675592  PMID: 32388867

Abstract

Aim:

To determine if pain is associated with 12-month incidence of mood affective disorders (MAD) among adults with cerebral palsy (CP).

Method:

Data from Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart, years 2013-2016, were used for this retrospective cohort study. Diagnostic codes were used to identify adults (18+ years) with CP, incident cases of MAD, and covariates (other neurodevelopmental conditions, sleep disorders, arthritis). Pain (any type, location) was identified between 10/01/2014 and 09/30/2015. The pain group was divided into new or consistent pain if they had a history of pain (i.e., consistent) in the 12-months prior to their first pain claim date between 10/01/2014 and 09/30/2015. Crude incidence rates (IR) of MAD (expressed per 100 person-years) were estimated. Cox regression was used to estimate hazard ratio (HR and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of MAD after adjusting for covariates.

Results:

Adults that had new pain (n=859; IR=15.5) or consistent pain (n=1,303; IR=17.9) had greater crude IR of MAD compared to adults without pain (n=3,726; IR=5.9). The elevated rate of MAD remained after adjusting for covariates, for new pain (HR=2.4; 95%CI=1.9-3.0) and consistent pain (HR=2.1; 95%CI=1.7-2.7).

Interpretation:

Pain is associated with greater incidence of MAD among adults with CP. This association remained after accounting for potential confounding factors.


The wide array of complications associated with cerebral palsy (CP) increases risk for developing a variety of physiological changes,1,2 including mental health disorders.3 Given that CP is a chronic condition with evidence of accelerated decline in health and function throughout the lifespan,46 the risk of mental health disorders is likely increased throughout adulthood.7 Indeed, emerging evidence has started to shed light on mental health-related risks for individuals with CP.3,811 In a nationwide study in the United States, adults with CP were found to have a higher prevalence of a variety of mental health disorders compared to adults without CP, with mood affective disorder (MAD) the most prevalent mental health disorder for adults with CP.9 In a nationwide study from the United Kingdom, the incidence of MAD was higher for adults with vs. without CP.8 This is concerning because mental health disorders, and particularly MAD, are implicated in the pathogenesis of unhealthful aging, and are therefore of great public health concern.12

While attention towards understanding the burden of MAD for adults with CP is growing, there is a dearth of evidence identifying longitudinal risk factors for predicting MAD. Recent cross-sectional work suggest a clustering of many commonly reported clinical factors with MAD among individuals with CP, including pain, sleep disorders, and arthritis, among other factors (e.g., fatigue, loneliness).3,10,1316 The mechanisms linking these factors are complex and dynamic, and may be driven by unique attributes of the individual, cognitive ability, health history, or a shared neurobiological etiology. Further, the temporal sequence of developing these clinical factors can differ across clinical populations,17,18 making clinical diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of MAD challenging.

To date, the temporal sequence of pain, sleep disorders, arthritis, and MAD is unknown for adults with CP. In other populations, there is mixed evidence of bidirectional causal relations between pain and MAD, with evidence to suggest that medical (or biological), psychological, and social factors, mediate the association as well as to drive the causal direction.19,20 Limited longitudinal studies of the effects of pain treatment suggest positive effects of pain reduction on MAD symptoms.21 In the population with CP, the association between pain and MAD may be influenced by the underlying mechanism causing CP and comorbid neurodevelopmental conditions, including intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, and epilepsy, each associated with mental health disorders.2224

The objective of this study was to determine the association between pain and 12-month incidence of MAD among adults with CP. We hypothesized that pain would be associated with higher 12-month incidence of MAD, even after accounting for neurodevelopmental conditions, sleep disorders, and arthritis.

Method

Data source

Data from 2013-2016 were extracted from the Optum Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (OptumInsight™, Eden Prairie, MN, USA), a U.S. nationwide de-identified single private payer administrative claims database.25 This database contains data from beneficiaries who have either commercial or Medicare Advantage health plans, and includes all service utilization (e.g., inpatient, outpatient) throughout their enrollment on the insurance plan. Medicare beneficiaries can opt to enroll in a private Medicare Advantage health plan. These plans can offer additional coverage not available in the public Medicare program (e.g., vision, hearing, dental). To be enrolled in a private payer health plan, beneficiaries of any age, income, or disability status either pay for coverage or are covered through their employer or parents up to the age of 26. To preserve patient identity, researchers leveraging this database are allowed either the Date of Death or Socioeconomic Status table. The current investigation was developed under a larger project in which the Date of Death table was obtained. Therefore, some information regarding socioeconomic status (i.e., income, education) were not available. Since data are de-identified, the University Institutional Review Board approved this study as non-regulated.

Sample selection

Medical conditions were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth and Tenth Revision (ICD-9 and ICD-10), Clinical Modification codes to account for the shift in reporting codes on October 1st, 2015, and are presented in Table I.

Table I.

Diagnostic codes for all medical conditions using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth or Tenth revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9/ICD-10) system.

Medical conditions ICD-9 family or individuals codes ICD-10 family or individuals codes
Neurodevelopmental conditions
 Cerebral palsy 333.71, 343 family G80 family
 Intellectual disabilities 317-19 families, 758.0-2, 758.31 F70-73 families, F78, F79
 Autism spectrum disorders 299.00, 299.01, 299.10, 299.11, 299.80, 299.81, 299.90, 299.91 F84.0, F84.3, F84.5, F84.8, F84.9
 Epilepsy 345 family G40 family
Pain
 Central pain syndrome; other chronic pain; chronic pain syndrome; abdominal pain; dorsalgia, including panniculitis affecting regions of the neck and back, radiculopathy, cervicalgia, sciatica, lumbago with sciatica, low back pain, pain in thoracic spine, other or unspecified dorsalgia; pain in joint, including shoulder, elbow, wrist, hand, hip, knee, ankle/foot; other or unspecified pain 338.0, 338.29, 338.4, 719.4 family, 724.1-5, 729.5, 780.96, 789.0 family G89.0, G89.29, G89.4, M54 family, M25.5 family, R10 family, R52 family
Substance abuse
Mood [affective] disorders
 Manic episode; bipolar disorder; major depressive disorder, single episode and recurrent; persistent mood [affective] disorders; unspecified mood [affective] disorders 296 family, 300.4, 301.12, 311 family F30-34 families, F39
Sleep disorders
 Insomnia; hypersomnia; circadian rhythm sleep disorders; sleep apnea; narcolepsy and cataplexy; parasomnia; sleep related movement disorders; other or unspecified sleep disorders; sleep disorders not due to a substance or known physiological condition, including insomnia, hypersomnia, sleepwalking, sleep terrors, nightmare disorder, other or unspecified sleep disorder 307.4 family, 327.0-5 families, 347.00, 347.01, 347.10, 347.11, 327.8, 780.51-54, 780.57-59 *
Arthritis
 Rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory polyarthropathies; osteoarthritis and allied disorders 714 family, 715 family *
*

ICD-9 version was used only.

The period of October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015 was initially used to identify eligible participants: adults ≥18 years of age with CP with at least one service utilization (to limit detection bias among persons who were not seen by a physician). We defined CP by at least one claim for any CP diagnosis.25 Data regarding severity of CP are not available in claims and >70% had “other” or “unspecified” CP, thereby preventing stratification of the sample by clinical CP subtypes.

The exposure variable was pain, including, but not limited to, central pain syndrome, chronic pain conditions, dorsalgia, and pain in joints. We defined pain in three steps. First, we identified the first claim for pain during the period of October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015. Second, individuals had to have at least one more claim for pain on a subsequent day within 12 months after their first pain claim date in step 1, to rule out initial claims that may have been for screening. Third, we categorized our sample based on “new” or “consistent” pain using a look-back period of 12 months. Therefore, further eligibility criteria involved continuous enrollment in a health plan and at least one of any service utilization types (e.g., inpatient) in the 12-months prior to their first pain claim date in step 1: new pain was defined as not having any claim for pain within 12 months before the first pain claim date in step 1; consistent pain was defined as having at least one claim for pain (any type or location) within 12 months before the first pain claim date in step 1. We grouped all pain conditions into a single dichotomous variable (i.e., yes/no) because the majority of diagnosed pain conditions are presumed to come from physicians that have little knowledge on how to adequately treat and/or monitor health for their adult patients with CP. Therefore, the accuracy of diagnosing pain (e.g., etiology, chronicity) in this database may be lower than the accuracy of identifying the presence/absence of any type of pain. We designated “new” and “consistent” pain as a proxy for new onset vs. chronic of any of the included pain conditions.

The comparison group in this study consisted of adults with CP that did not have any claims for pain between October 1, 2014 to September 30, 2015, and that also had at least one service utilization in the look-back period. The start date of follow up was the date of the first claim for pain or a randomly assigned date for adults without pain by using a uniform distribution to randomly assign a date during the individual’s enrollment period.

Outcome measure

The outcome event was the occurrence of incident MAD up to 12 months after the start date of follow up, defined by at least one claim.9 Individuals were excluded of they had at least one claim for MAD in their 12-month look-back period.

Covariates

Sociodemographic covariates included age, sex, ethnic group, and U.S. region. Neurodevelopmental conditions included intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, and epilepsy. Baseline sleep disorders and arthritis and other inflammatory polyarthropathies (hereafter referred to as “arthritis”) were identified in the look-back period. Healthcare utilization was determined as the number of all service visits (e.g., inpatient) during the look-back period.

Statistical analysis

Crude incidence rates (IR) of MAD were estimated as the number of outcome events divided by the amount of person-years, expressed per 100/year. Crude IR ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were estimated using the group without pain as the reference. Individuals were right censored at death, loss to follow-up, or end of study period (12 months after start date of follow-up).

Cox proportional hazard regression models were fitted to adjust for covariates when comparing IR, by estimating hazard ratios (HR, 95% CI) of MAD incidence, comparing each exposure group with the reference group. Three sets of covariates were used to explain the difference in crude rates between groups: model 1 – age (continuous), sex, US region, and healthcare utilization (quintiles); model 2 – model 1 covariates plus neurodevelopmental conditions; and model 3 – model 2 covariates plus baseline sleep disorders and arthritis. Possible interactions between exposure status and age or sex were assessed by conducting separate analyses for age or sex strata and including product terms in the Cox models. Proportional hazards assumption was visually inspected and was met.

Sensitivity analysis

Ethnic group was not adjusted for in the Cox regression models to limit potential bias due to missing ethnic group data. We conducted two sensitivity analyses to assess for possible confounding and selection bias in the main analysis. Sensitivity analysis #1 was a complete case analysis that did not adjust for ethnic group; sensitivity analysis #2 was a complete case analysis that adjusted for ethnic group. Results were compared from sensitivity analyses #1 and #2 to assess possible confounding by ethnic group. Results were also compared from sensitivity analysis #1 and the main analysis to assess for possible selection bias attributable to exclusion of adults without ethnic group data.

We excluded individuals from the main analysis that had one claim for pain between October 1, 2014 and September 30, 2015 and without a subsequent claim for pain 12 months after that met other inclusion criteria (n=349). We conducted a sensitivity analysis using the procedures described above after adding these individuals to the respective pain group, to assess for possible selection bias.

Due to the observational design and lack of medication information (e.g., anti-epileptic drugs, pain medication), which is a limitation to the current study, results are subject to bias from unmeasured confounding. We estimated the extent of unmeasured confounding by computing e-values, which measures the minimum strength of association needed to explain away a specific exposure-outcome association, conditional on the set of covariates.26

Analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Baseline descriptive characteristics of adults without pain (n=3,726), new pain (n=859), and consistent pain (n=1,303) are presented in Table II.

Table II.

Baseline descriptive characteristics of adults with cerebral palsy by pain status.

Without pain
(n=3,726)
New pain
(n=859)
Consistent pain
(n=1,303)

% (n) % (n) % (n)
Age, mean (SD) 44.9 (19.3) 52.7 (19.0) 56.7 (17.2)
 18-40 years 45.5 (1,697) 29.3 (252) 18.6 (242)
 41-64 years 35.1 (1,309) 39.6 (340) 47.4 (618)
 ≥65 years 19.3 (720) 31.1 (267) 34 (443)
Sex
 Women 44.7 (1,667) 50.4 (433) 50.3 (655)
 Men 55.3 (2,059) 49.6 (426) 49.7 (648)
Ethnic group
 White 64.0 (2,385) 67.5 (580) 61.2 (798)
 Black 9.2 (344) 10.5 (90) 11.4 (148)
 Hispanic 10.0 (372) 8.4 (72) 8.4 (110)
 Asian 3.6 (135) 2.3 (20) 1.6 (21)
 Unknown/missing 13.2 (490) 11.3 (97) 17.3 (226)
US region
 West 27.7 (1,031) 28.1 (241) 25.1 (327)
 Midwest 24.0 (896) 23.4 (201) 23.4 (305)
 South 38.7 (1,441) 37.1 (319) 37.2 (485)
 Northeast 9.2 (342) 10.9 (94) 14.0 (183)
 Unknown/missing 0.4 (16) 0.5 (4) 0.2 (3)
Intellectual disabilities 22.4 (836) 16.6 (143) 12.3 (160)
Autism spectrum disorders 4.6 (173) 2.4 (21) 1.6 (21)
Epilepsy 29.1 (1,083) 22.4 (192) 21.6 (281)
Sleep disorders 4.5 (169) 6.1 (52) 10.1 (131)
Arthritis 4.1 (152) 5.7 (49) 20.3 (265)
Healthcare utilization (# of visits)
 Median (IQR) 8 (4-19) 11 (5-22) 24 (13-42)
 Quintiles
 1-4 29.3 (1,093) 22.2 (191) 3.6 (47)
 >4-8 22.7 (846) 17.1 (147) 10.0 (130)
 >8-15 18.6 (694) 24.2 (208) 17.4 (227)
 >15-31 15.2 (566) 20.0 (172) 30.5 (397)
 >31 14.1 (527) 16.4 (141) 38.5 (502)

SD, standard deviation; IQR, interquartile range.

Incidence rate of MAD

The crude IR was 5.86 for adults without pain, 15.52 for new pain, and 17.92 for consistent pain (Table III). Compared to adults without pain, the crude IRR was elevated for adults with new pain (IRR=2.65; 95% CI=2.10-3.34) and consistent pain (IRR=3.06; 95% CI=2.51-3.73). Compared to adults with consistent pain, the crude IRR was similar for adults with new pain (IRR=0.87; 95% CI=0.69-1.09) (data not shown).

Table III.

Crude incidence rate (IR) and rate ratio (IRR) and adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of mood affective disorders (MAD) among adults with cerebral palsy by pain status.

MAD cases Crude IR Crude IRR Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
N N per 100/years IRR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Without pain 193 5.86 Reference Reference Reference Reference
New pain 114 15.52 2.65 (2.10, 3.34) 2.35 (1.86, 2.97) 2.34 (1.85, 2.96) 2.35 (1.86, 2.97)
Consistent pain 196 17.92 3.06 (2.51, 3.73) 2.22 (1.79, 2.76) 2.18 (1.75, 2.72) 2.13 (1.71, 2.67)

CI, confidence interval. Model 1- age, sex, US region, healthcare utilization. Model 2- model 1 variables and intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, epilepsy. Model 3- model 2 variables and baseline sleep disorders, baseline arthritis.

Cox regression analysis of MAD

Compared to adults without pain, the HR (95% CI) adjusting for demographic variables and healthcare utilization (model 1) was 2.35 (1.86-2.97) for adults with new pain and 2.22 (1.79-2.76) for adults with consistent pain (Table III). The HRs were not largely affected when further adjusting for comorbid neurodevelopmental conditions (model 2). After further adjustment for sleep disorders and arthritis (model 3), the HR was unaffected compared to model 1 for adults with new pain (HR=2.35; 95% CI=1.86-2.97) and decreased slightly from model 1 for adults with consistent pain, but remained elevated (HR=2.13; 95% CI=1.71-2.67). The adjusted rate of MAD was not different for adults with new vs. consistent pain when adjusting for covariates in model 1 (HR=1.06; 95% CI=0.83-1.35), model 2 (HR=1.07; 95% CI=0.84-1.37), and model 3 (HR=1.10; 95% CI=0.86-1.41) (data not shown).

Sensitivity analysis

For individuals with complete data on ethnic group (n=5,075), the MAD cases, IR, and IRR (reference: without pain) were 161 and 5.63 for adults without pain, 102 and 15.58 for new pain (IRR=2.77; 95% CI=2.16-3.55), and 160 and 17.67 for consistent pain (IRR=3.14; 95% CI=2.52-3.91). Adjusted HRs of MAD are presented in Table IV. Crude IR and IRR were similar to the main analysis. A comparison of HR estimates from sensitivity analysis #1 and #2 show similar results, suggesting that ethnic group is not a confounder in the main analysis. A comparison of HR estimates from sensitivity analysis #1 and the main analysis show similar results, providing no evidence to suggest selection bias.

Table IV.

Adjusted hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval of mood affective disorders (MAD) among adults with cerebral palsy by pain status with complete data on ethnic group (n=5,075).

Model 1 Model 1 + ethnic group Model 2 Model 2 + ethnic group Model 3 Model 3 + ethnic group
Without pain Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference Reference
Consistent pain 2.27 (1.79, 2.88) 2.21 (1.74, 2.81) 2.18 (1.71, 2.78) 2.24 (1.76, 2.84) 2.19 (1.72, 2.78) 2.16 (1.69, 2.75)
New pain 2.42 (1.88, 3.11) 2.40 (1.87, 3.09) 2.39 (1.86, 3.08) 2.41 (1.87, 3.10) 2.39 (1.86, 3.07) 2.38 (1.85, 3.07)

CI, confidence interval. Model 1- age, sex, US region, healthcare utilization. Model 2- model 1 variables and intellectual disabilities, autism spectrum disorders, epilepsy. Model 3- model 2 variables and baseline sleep disorders, baseline arthritis.

The results of the sensitivity analysis that included individuals with at least one claim for pain (n=1,080 new pain; n=1,431 consistent pain) were in accordance with the main analysis for the new pain group (IR=13.93; IRR=2.38, 95% CI=1.90-2.97; model 3 HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.70-2.66) and consistent pain group (IR=17.02; IRR=2.91, 95% CI=2.39-3.54; model 3 HR=2.00, 95% CI=1.61-2.48), providing no evidence to suggest selection bias.

The e-value (lower 95% CI) was 4.13 (3.12) for new pain vs. no pain and 3.68 (2.81) for consistent pain vs. no pain. Given the large e-values, it appears unlikely that unmeasured confounding or lack of medication information largely biased effect estimates for the exposure variables.

Discussion

The main finding of this study is that pain, whether new onset or consistent, was associated with greater 12-month incidence of MAD among adults with CP, which was largely unaffected by comorbid neurodevelopmental conditions, sleep disorders, and arthritis. Mental health disorders, and particularly MAD, are a primary driver of the burden of disease for adults12 and can be prevented or treated if adequate clinical knowledge is established leading to detection and response. Knowing that pain increases risk of MAD suggests the need for improved screening strategies and opportunities for intervention to mitigate risk of both pain and MAD specific to the heterogeneous and medically complex nature of CP.

In the current study, the prevalence of pain was ~37%, consistent with the range of 33%–75% previously reported for individuals with CP.10,27 The 12-month incidence of MAD for the entire CP cohort was ~9%, which is lower than the 18% for depression previously reported.8 However, the study by Smith et al.8 examined incidence over a 28-year period. In the current study, there were considerable differences in age and healthcare utilization. We therefore used Cox regression to adjust for age, sex, U.S. region, and healthcare utilization. The adjusted HR were more than 2-fold higher compared to adults without pain. Further adjustment for comorbid neurodevelopmental conditions, sleep disorders, and arthritis, which are all implicated in the pathogenesis of pain and MAD, had little-to-no impact on HRs for both pain groups. After adjusting for all covariates, pain was associated with a 2.1- to 2.4-fold higher rate of MAD compared to no pain among adults with CP, with no difference between the pain groups.

The link between pain, sleep disorders, arthritis, and MAD is complex, especially for CP, and may be affected by patient (e.g., comorbidities, resilience, loneliness) and environmental (e.g., socioeconomic status, adverse events) characteristics. This study was designed to investigate the pathway of pain to incident MAD, and we found a robust association; however, this study does not rule out the possibility that sleep disorders or other factors may be involved early in the pathogenic pathway leading to pain (or pain exacerbation) and/or MAD for a different sector of the CP population, or that MAD leads to these factors. Studies in different clinical populations suggest unique pathways where pain impedes sleep, with a subsequent effect on depressive symptoms.17 On the other hand, sleep disorders may contribute to exacerbating pain, and consequently, heighten depressive symptoms.28 Also, depressive symptoms have been suggested as a mediator of the sleep-pain association.18 Further longitudinal investigation of the temporal sequence of pain, sleep disorders, arthritis, and MAD will be essential in establishing causal arguments and developing an understanding of the possible mechanisms that link these factors among adults with CP.

There are a number of limitations of this study. First, data were from a private payer claims database, which likely reflects the higher-functioning segment of the CP population. This speculation is based on differences in enrollment criteria between private and public insurance types, medical needs of individuals with CP based on insurance coverage, and prevalent chronic diseases for adults with pediatric-onset disabilities (higher among publicly vs privately insured), including CP.25,29 It is important to note that while the prevalence estimates of the exposure and outcome may reflect the higher-functioning segment of the CP population, it is plausible that the direction, and even the strength, of the exposure-outcome association observed in this study is representative of what occurs in the general CP population. Nevertheless, study conclusions should be considered within the scope of this particular population of privately insured adults with CP. Second, in order to be identified as having pain in claims data, the individual must be cognizant of their pain levels and communicate this to their healthcare provider. Some individuals with more severe forms of CP, cognitive or communication impairments, or who have become de-sensitized to their chronic pain condition may not have communicated their pain. Same holds true for MAD, which often goes unrecognized in CP. Third, we did not stratify the pain group by pain type. Pain can be driven by peripheral or central mechanisms, or a combination of both. Historically, pain is not well assessed or characterized for the CP population. Pain may be assumed to be more peripherally-driven from muscles and joints due to altered mechanical loading patterns, a history of orthopedic abnormalities and surgical interventions, or higher prevalence of arthritis.30 Therefore, a medical professional with little experience treating adults with CP may be more likely to incorrectly diagnose pain, and thus be incorrectly reflected in claims data. In addition, consistent pain was defined as a claim for any pain condition, not necessarily the same pain condition, in the 12-months prior to the first pain claim. Future studies are warranted to identify which pain conditions are associated with MAD incidence. Fourth, although we were following traditional claims-based methods, the relatively short time period may have missed those that had MAD prior to pain. Fifth, MAD based on ICD codes instead of DSM may either underscore or overrate MAD. Sixth, we did not adjust for other mental health disorders (e.g., anxiety) or substance abuse. Future studies are needed to investigate how these conditions factor into the association between pain and MAD, which could assist in clinical monitoring and treatment of mental health disorders for adults with CP.

In conclusion, pain is associated with greater 12-month incidence of MAD among privately insured adults with CP. The pain-MAD association was largely unaffected by the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, sleep disorders, and arthritis. Future studies are needed to determine whether effective pain management reduces the risk of onset of MAD.

What this paper adds.

  • Pain was associated with higher 12-month incidence of mood affective disorders (MAD)

  • The 12-month MAD incidence was similar between new and consistent pain groups

  • The MAD incidence remained higher adjusting for neurodevelopmental comorbidities, sleep-disorders, and arthritis

Acknowledgements

All authors declare no conflict of interest. Daniel G. Whitney is supported by the University of Michigan Office of Health Equity and Inclusion Diversity Fund and American Academy of Cerebral Palsy and Developmental Medicine. Seth A. Warschausky is funded by the National Institutes of Health [5 UL1 TR002240-05] and the Mildred E. Swanson Foundation. The funding sources had no role in the design or conduct of the study; collect, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

References

  • 1.Whitney DG, Singh H, Miller F, et al. Cortical bone deficit and fat infiltration of bone marrow and skeletal muscle in ambulatory children with mild spastic cerebral palsy. Bone. 2017;94:90–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Whitney DG, Miller F, Pohlig RT, Modlesky CM. BMI does not capture the high fat mass index and low fat-free mass index in children with cerebral palsy and proposed statistical models that improve this accuracy. Int J Obes (Lond). 2019;43(1):82–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Whitney DG, Warschausky SA, Peterson MD. Mental health disorders and physical risk factors in children with cerebral palsy: a cross-sectional study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(5):579–585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Day SM, Wu YW, Strauss DJ, Shavelle RM, Reynolds RJ. Change in ambulatory ability of adolescents and young adults with cerebral palsy. Developmental medicine and child neurology. 2007;49(9):647–653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whitney DG, Hurvitz EA, Devlin MJ, et al. Age trajectories of musculoskeletal morbidities in adults with cerebral palsy. Bone. 2018;114:285–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Peterson MD, Kamdar N, Hurvitz EA. Age-related trends in cardiometabolic disease among adults with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019;61(4):484–489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pine DS, Cohen P, Gurley D, Brook J, Ma Y. The risk for early-adulthood anxiety and depressive disorders in adolescents with anxiety and depressive disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998;55(1):56–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Smith KJ, Peterson MD, O’Connell NE, et al. Risk of Depression and Anxiety in Adults With Cerebral Palsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(3):294–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Whitney DG, Warschausky SA, Ng S, Hurvitz EA, Kamdar NS, Peterson MD. Prevalence of Mental Health Disorders Among Adults With Cerebral Palsy: A Cross-sectional Analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Der Slot WM, Nieuwenhuijsen C, Van Den Berg-Emons RJ, et al. Chronic pain, fatigue, and depressive symptoms in adults with spastic bilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(9):836–842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Weber P, Bolli P, Heimgartner N, Merlo P, Zehnder T, Katterer C. Behavioral and emotional problems in children and adults with cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2016;20(2):270–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2012;380(9859):2197–2223. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Whitney DG. Racial differences in skeletal fragility but not osteoarthritis among women and men with cerebral palsy. Bone Rep. 2019;In Press. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jensen MP, Engel JM, Schwartz L. Coping with cerebral palsy pain: a preliminary longitudinal study. Pain Med. 2006;7(1):30–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Engel JM, Schwartz L, Jensen MP, Johnson DR. Pain in cerebral palsy: the relation of coping strategies to adjustment. Pain. 2000;88(3):225–230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jaremka LM, Andridge RR, Fagundes CP, et al. Pain, depression, and fatigue: loneliness as a longitudinal risk factor. Health Psychol. 2014;33(9):948–957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Diaz-Piedra C, Catena A, Miro E, Martinez MP, Sanchez AI, Buela-Casal G. The impact of pain on anxiety and depression is mediated by objective and subjective sleep characteristics in fibromyalgia patients. Clin J Pain. 2014;30(10):852–859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pavlova M, Ference J, Hancock M, Noel M. Disentangling the Sleep-Pain Relationship in Pediatric Chronic Pain: The Mediating Role of Internalizing Mental Health Symptoms. Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:1586921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Amtmann D, Askew RL, Kim J, et al. Pain affects depression through anxiety, fatigue, and sleep in multiple sclerosis. Rehabil Psychol. 2015;60(1):81–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lerman SF, Rudich Z, Brill S, Shalev H, Shahar G. Longitudinal associations between depression, anxiety, pain, and pain-related disability in chronic pain patients. Psychosom Med. 2015;77(3):333–341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hassett AL, Marshall E, Bailey AM, et al. Changes in Anxiety and Depression Are Mediated by Changes in Pain Severity in Patients Undergoing Lower-Extremity Total Joint Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(1):14–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Austin KL, Hunter M, Gallagher E, Campbell LE. Depression and anxiety symptoms during the transition to early adulthood for people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2018;62(5):407–421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Simonoff E, Pickles A, Charman T, Chandler S, Loucas T, Baird G. Psychiatric disorders in children with autism spectrum disorders: prevalence, comorbidity, and associated factors in a population-derived sample. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2008;47(8):921–929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kanner AM, Schachter SC, Barry JJ, et al. Depression and epilepsy: epidemiologic and neurobiologic perspectives that may explain their high comorbid occurrence. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(2):156–168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Whitney DG. Prevalence of High-Burden Medical Conditions Among Young and Middle-Aged Adults With Pediatric-Onset Medical Conditions: Findings From US Private and Public Administrative Claims Data. International Journal of Health Policy and Management. 2019;8(11):629–635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.VanderWeele TJ, Ding P. Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value. Ann Intern Med. 2017;167(4):268–274. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Russo RN, Miller MD, Haan E, Cameron ID, Crotty M. Pain characteristics and their association with quality of life and self-concept in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy identified from a population register. Clin J Pain. 2008;24(4):335–342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hamilton NA, Pressman M, Lillis T, Atchley R, Karlson C, Stevens N. Evaluating Evidence for the Role of Sleep in Fibromyalgia: A Test of the Sleep and Pain Diathesis Model. Cognit Ther Res. 2012;36(6):806–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.French ZP, Caird MS, Whitney DG. Osteoporosis Epidemiology Among Adults With Cerebral Palsy: Findings From Private and Public Administrative Claims Data. JBMR Plus. 2019;3(11):e10231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.French ZP, Torres RV, Whitney DG. Elevated prevalence of osteoarthritis among adults with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(8):575–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES