Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are considered a relevant therapeutic product for various clinical applications. They have generated great interest as cell therapies for a range of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions [1]. Residing in different niches, these progenitor cells are involved in tissue homeostasis. Though largely debated, the presence of circulating endogenous MSCs (native MSCs) has been reported in multiple pathophysiological conditions, but the significance of such cell circulation is not known and therapeutically untapped [2]. In vitro, they are fibroblast-like cells with a great ability to adhere to plastic and they display a specific phenotype. The immunological profile of MSCs should be carefully evaluated, particularly regarding their immunogenicity. MSCs can be virtually found in almost all tissues, which makes easy their isolation and expansion. The sources of MSCs must be acknowledged and optimized to ensure their appropriate identity and properties. However, there are still many limitations and unresolved problems regarding stem cell therapy in terms of ethical barriers, immune rejection, tumorigenicity, and cell sources [3]. Depending on their origin, they can exert several functions including support of hematopoiesis, tissue repair, immunomodulation, and the stimulation of resident progenitor cells. Although these cells possess robust therapeutic properties that can be applied in the treatment of different diseases, variables in preclinical and clinical trials lead to inconsistent outcomes [4]. Historically applied for regenerative medicine, the capacity of MSCs to differentiate into multiple lineages was linked to their therapeutic function. As proposed, they may act as trophic and anti-inflammatory signaling cells rather than by differentiating cells. MSCs are not immune cells but tissue precursor cells with immunomodulatory features that show important interplay and interactions with other tissue progenitor cells. It is likely that the beneficial effects of MSCs result from their paracrine pathways affected by either local environment or culture conditions [5]. Indeed, MSCs, by sensing different signals within the local tissue, are environmentally responsive cells that show plasticity in their functions. The influence of the environment allows MSCs to adapt their fate when facing tissue challenges. It is now recognized that they release different mediators including growth factors, cytokines, and genetic material underlying the therapeutic effects of MSCs. These molecules may be secreted or packaged within extracellular vesicles (EVs). EVs are nano-sized membrane-bound vesicles that shuttle important signals between cells to maintain physiological homeostasis. By selectively isolating these MSC-derived vesicles, they can be infused instead of the cells for different clinical purposes [6]. EVs not only have the same effects as MSCs, but they also have the advantages of targeted delivery, low immunogenicity, and high repairability. Pre-clinical studies using animal models of disease have been conducted with MSC-derived EVs. The effectiveness of these strategies is associated with the presence of several parameters that might impact the quantity and quality of the released EVs. The mechanism of action of EVs, which is required for translating preclinical data to clinics, remains to be determined [7]. Whereas many characteristics of MSCs have been reported, other aspects of their biological, immunological, and trophic features during tissue healing need to be more clarified. All these features will contribute in improving the safety and efficiency of MSC-based therapy.
Acknowledgments
We thank the authors for their help and support during the editorial process of this special issue.
Funding
This study was supported by Generation For Life Foundation, “Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS)”, “Télévie”, “Les Amis de l’Institut Jules Bordet”, “La Chaire en Arthrose de l’Université de Montréal” and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wobma H., Satwani P. Mesenchymal stromal cells: Getting ready for clinical primetime. Transfus. Apher. Sci. 2021;11:103058. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2021.103058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Girousse A., Mathieu M., Sastourné-Arrey Q., Monferran S., Casteilla L., Sengenès C. Endogenous Mobilization of Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: A Pathway for Interorgan Communication? Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021;8:1534. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.598520. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Liu Q.W., Huang Q.M., Wu H.Y., Zuo G.S., Gu H.C., Deng K.Y., Xin H.B. Characteristics and Therapeutic Potential of Human Amnion-Derived Stem Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:970. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Miceli V., Bulati M., Iannolo G., Zito G., Gallo A., Conaldi P.G. Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells: The Need of Cell Priming for Cell-Free Therapies in Regenerative Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:763. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Samal J.R.K., Rangasami V.K., Samanta S., Varghese O.P., Oommen O.P. Discrepancies on the Role of Oxygen Gradient and Culture Condition on Mesenchymal Stem Cell Fate. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2021:e2002058. doi: 10.1002/adhm.202002058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tang Y., Zhou Y., Li H.J. Advances in mesenchymal stem cell exosomes: A review. Stem Cell Res. Ther. 2021;12:71. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02138-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Shekari F., Nazari A., Kashani S.A., Hajizadeh-Saffar E., Lim R., Baharvand H. Pre-clinical investigation of mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles: A systematic review. Cytotherapy. 2021 doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2020.12.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
