In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The references for the entry “Looked alternately at the food and the owner when it could access the food” (section “social reference”) were incorrect. The corrected Table 1 appears below.
Table 1.
Dogs | References | Cats | References |
---|---|---|---|
Response to human gaze | |||
Stole food less often | Call et al., 2003; Kaminski et al., 2013 | Avoided the gaze of familiar human | Koyasu and Nagasawa, 2019 |
Obeyed more commands of their owners | Schwab and Huber, 2006 | Selected food from humans who looked at them | Ito et al., 2016 |
Fetched the toy that humans could see in the situation with two toys | Call et al., 2003 | ||
Increased attention-getting behaviors | Ohkita et al., 2016 | ||
Selected food from humans who looked at them | Gácsi et al., 2004 | ||
Using human signals | |||
Used human pointing in the task of selecting one of two containers | Miklosi et al., 2005 | Used human pointing in the task of selecting one of two containers | Miklosi et al., 2005 |
Used human gaze direction with pointing in the task of selecting one of two containers | Hare et al., 2002 | Looked in the direction indicated by human gaze (with head movements) | Pongrácz et al., 2019 |
Looked in the direction directed by human gaze (with head movements) | Hare et al., 1998; Agnetta et al., 2000; Téglás et al., 2012; Met et al., 2014 | Followed the container that humans visited in a situation with two food containers | Chijiiwa et al., 2020 |
Followed the container that humans visited in a situation with two food containers | Chijiiwa et al., 2020; Nagasawa et al., 2020 | ||
Social reference | |||
Looked alternately at the food and the owner when it could access the food | Miklosi et al., 2005, Lazzaroni et al., 2020 | Did not look alternately at the food and the owner when it could not access the food | Miklosi et al., 2005 |
Looked alternately at the strange object and the owner | Merola et al., 2012a,b | Looked alternately at the strange object and the owner | Merola et al., 2015 |
The role of gaze in bond formation | |||
Increased attention-getting behaviors in dogs, which function as attachment behaviors in response to human gaze | Ohkita et al., 2016 | Eyeblink synchronization during mutual gazing | Koyasu et al., 2020 |
Dog owner's oxytocin secretion increased in response to the dog's gaze | Nagasawa et al., 2009 | ||
An oxytocin-mediated positive loop of bond formation facilitated and modulated by gazing, like mother-infant | Nagasawa et al., 2015 | ||
Eyeblink synchronization during mutual gazing | Koyasu et al., 2020 |
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
- Agnetta B., Hare B., Tomasello M. (2000). Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim. Cogn. 3, 107–112. 10.1007/s100710000070 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Call J., Bräuer J., Kaminski J., Tomasello M. (2003). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J. Comp. Psychol. 117:257. 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chijiiwa H., Takagi S., Arahori M., Hori Y., Saito A., Kuroshima H. (2020). Dogs and cats prioritize human action: choosing a now-empty instead of a still-baited container. Anim. Cogn. 10.1007/s10071-020-01416-w [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gácsi M., Miklósi A., Varga O., Topál J., Csányi V. (2004). Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human's attention. Anim. Cogn. 7:144. 10.1007/s10071-003-0205-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hare B., Brown M., Williamson C., Tomasello M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 1634–1636. 10.1126/science.1072702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hare B., Call J., Tomasello M. (1998). Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris). Evol. Commun. 2, 137–159. 10.1075/eoc.2.1.06har [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ito Y., Watanabe A., Takagi S., Arahori M., Saito A. (2016). Cats beg for food from the human who looks at and calls to them: ability to understand humans'attentional states. Psychologia 59, 112–120. 10.2117/psysoc.2016.112 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kaminski J., Pitsch A., Tomasello M. (2013). Dogs steal in the dark. Anim. Cogn. 16:385. 10.1007/s10071-012-0579-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koyasu H., Goto R., Takagi S., Nakano T., Nagasawa M., Kikusui T. (2020). Mutual synchronization of eyeblinks between dogs/cats and humans, in Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Animal Psychology, Suita. [Google Scholar]
- Koyasu H., Nagasawa M. (2019). Recognition of directed-gaze from humans in cats. Jpn. J. Anim. Psychol. 69, 2–3. [Google Scholar]
- Lazzaroni M., Marshall-Pescini S., Manzenreiter H., Gosch S., Pøibilová L., Darc L. (2020). Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted. Anim. Cogn. 23:427. 10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merola I., Lazzaroni M., Marshall-Pescini S., Prato-Previde E. (2015). Social referencing and cat-human communication. Anim. Cogn. 18, 639–648. 10.1007/s10071-014-0832-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merola I., Prato-Previde E., Marshall-Pescini S. (2012a). Dogs' social referencing towards owners and strangers. PLoS One 7:e47653. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merola I., Prato-Previde E., Marshall-Pescini S. (2012b). Social referencing in dog-owner dyads? Anim. Cogn. 15, 175–185. 10.1007/s10071-011-0443-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Met A., Miklósi Á, Lakatos G. (2014). Gaze-following behind barriers in domestic dogs. Anim. Cogn. 17:1401. 10.1007/s10071-014-0754-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miklosi A., Pongracz P., Lakatos G., Topal J., Csanyi V. (2005). A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J. Comp. Psychol. 119, 179–186. 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagasawa M., Kikusui T., Onaka T., Ohta M. (2009). Dog's gaze at its owner increases owner's urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Horm. Behav. 55, 434–441. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagasawa M., Mitsui S., En S., Ohtani N., Ohta M., Sakuma Y. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science 348, 333–336. 10.1126/science.1261022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nagasawa M., Mogi K., Ohtsuki H., Kikusui T. (2020). Familiarity with humans affect dogs' tendencies to follow human majority groups. Sci. Rep. 10:7119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohkita M., Nagasawa M., Kazutaka M., Kikusui T. (2016). Owners' direct gazes increase dogs' attention-getting behaviors. Behav. Process. 125:96. 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pongrácz P., Szapu J. S., Faragó T. (2019). Cats (Felis silvestris catus) read human gaze for referential information. Intelligence 74, 43–52. 10.1016/j.intell.2018.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Schwab C., Huber L. (2006). Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J. Comp. Psychol. 120:169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Téglás E., Gergely A., Kupán K., Miklósi Á, Topál J. (2012). Dogs' gaze following is tuned to human communicative signals. Curr. Biol. 22:209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]