Skip to main content
Frontiers in Psychology logoLink to Frontiers in Psychology
. 2021 Mar 1;12:645366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.645366

Corrigendum: The Gaze Communications Between Dogs/Cats and Humans: Recent Research Review and Future Directions

Hikari Koyasu 1,2, Takefumi Kikusui 1, Saho Takagi 1,2, Miho Nagasawa 1,*
PMCID: PMC7957064  PMID: 33732198

In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 as published. The references for the entry “Looked alternately at the food and the owner when it could access the food” (section “social reference”) were incorrect. The corrected Table 1 appears below.

Table 1.

Gaze communication between dogs/cats and humans.

Dogs References Cats References
Response to human gaze
Stole food less often Call et al., 2003; Kaminski et al., 2013 Avoided the gaze of familiar human Koyasu and Nagasawa, 2019
Obeyed more commands of their owners Schwab and Huber, 2006 Selected food from humans who looked at them Ito et al., 2016
Fetched the toy that humans could see in the situation with two toys Call et al., 2003
Increased attention-getting behaviors Ohkita et al., 2016
Selected food from humans who looked at them Gácsi et al., 2004
Using human signals
Used human pointing in the task of selecting one of two containers Miklosi et al., 2005 Used human pointing in the task of selecting one of two containers Miklosi et al., 2005
Used human gaze direction with pointing in the task of selecting one of two containers Hare et al., 2002 Looked in the direction indicated by human gaze (with head movements) Pongrácz et al., 2019
Looked in the direction directed by human gaze (with head movements) Hare et al., 1998; Agnetta et al., 2000; Téglás et al., 2012; Met et al., 2014 Followed the container that humans visited in a situation with two food containers Chijiiwa et al., 2020
Followed the container that humans visited in a situation with two food containers Chijiiwa et al., 2020; Nagasawa et al., 2020
Social reference
Looked alternately at the food and the owner when it could access the food Miklosi et al., 2005, Lazzaroni et al., 2020 Did not look alternately at the food and the owner when it could not access the food Miklosi et al., 2005
Looked alternately at the strange object and the owner Merola et al., 2012a,b Looked alternately at the strange object and the owner Merola et al., 2015
The role of gaze in bond formation
Increased attention-getting behaviors in dogs, which function as attachment behaviors in response to human gaze Ohkita et al., 2016 Eyeblink synchronization during mutual gazing Koyasu et al., 2020
Dog owner's oxytocin secretion increased in response to the dog's gaze Nagasawa et al., 2009
An oxytocin-mediated positive loop of bond formation facilitated and modulated by gazing, like mother-infant Nagasawa et al., 2015
Eyeblink synchronization during mutual gazing Koyasu et al., 2020

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

References

  1. Agnetta B., Hare B., Tomasello M. (2000). Cues to food location that domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) of different ages do and do not use. Anim. Cogn. 3, 107–112. 10.1007/s100710000070 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Call J., Bräuer J., Kaminski J., Tomasello M. (2003). Domestic dogs (Canis familiaris) are sensitive to the attentional state of humans. J. Comp. Psychol. 117:257. 10.1037/0735-7036.117.3.257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chijiiwa H., Takagi S., Arahori M., Hori Y., Saito A., Kuroshima H. (2020). Dogs and cats prioritize human action: choosing a now-empty instead of a still-baited container. Anim. Cogn. 10.1007/s10071-020-01416-w [Epub ahead of print]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gácsi M., Miklósi A., Varga O., Topál J., Csányi V. (2004). Are readers of our face readers of our minds? Dogs (Canis familiaris) show situation-dependent recognition of human's attention. Anim. Cogn. 7:144. 10.1007/s10071-003-0205-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hare B., Brown M., Williamson C., Tomasello M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science 298, 1634–1636. 10.1126/science.1072702 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hare B., Call J., Tomasello M. (1998). Communication of food location between human and dog (Canis familiaris). Evol. Commun. 2, 137–159. 10.1075/eoc.2.1.06har [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ito Y., Watanabe A., Takagi S., Arahori M., Saito A. (2016). Cats beg for food from the human who looks at and calls to them: ability to understand humans'attentional states. Psychologia 59, 112–120. 10.2117/psysoc.2016.112 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaminski J., Pitsch A., Tomasello M. (2013). Dogs steal in the dark. Anim. Cogn. 16:385. 10.1007/s10071-012-0579-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Koyasu H., Goto R., Takagi S., Nakano T., Nagasawa M., Kikusui T. (2020). Mutual synchronization of eyeblinks between dogs/cats and humans, in Proceedings of the 80th Annual Meeting of the Japanese Society for Animal Psychology, Suita. [Google Scholar]
  10. Koyasu H., Nagasawa M. (2019). Recognition of directed-gaze from humans in cats. Jpn. J. Anim. Psychol. 69, 2–3. [Google Scholar]
  11. Lazzaroni M., Marshall-Pescini S., Manzenreiter H., Gosch S., Pøibilová L., Darc L. (2020). Why do dogs look back at the human in an impossible task? Looking back behaviour may be over-interpreted. Anim. Cogn. 23:427. 10.1007/s10071-020-01345-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Merola I., Lazzaroni M., Marshall-Pescini S., Prato-Previde E. (2015). Social referencing and cat-human communication. Anim. Cogn. 18, 639–648. 10.1007/s10071-014-0832-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Merola I., Prato-Previde E., Marshall-Pescini S. (2012a). Dogs' social referencing towards owners and strangers. PLoS One 7:e47653. 10.1371/journal.pone.0047653 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Merola I., Prato-Previde E., Marshall-Pescini S. (2012b). Social referencing in dog-owner dyads? Anim. Cogn. 15, 175–185. 10.1007/s10071-011-0443-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Met A., Miklósi Á, Lakatos G. (2014). Gaze-following behind barriers in domestic dogs. Anim. Cogn. 17:1401. 10.1007/s10071-014-0754-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Miklosi A., Pongracz P., Lakatos G., Topal J., Csanyi V. (2005). A comparative study of the use of visual communicative signals in interactions between dogs (Canis familiaris) and humans and cats (Felis catus) and humans. J. Comp. Psychol. 119, 179–186. 10.1037/0735-7036.119.2.179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nagasawa M., Kikusui T., Onaka T., Ohta M. (2009). Dog's gaze at its owner increases owner's urinary oxytocin during social interaction. Horm. Behav. 55, 434–441. 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2008.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Nagasawa M., Mitsui S., En S., Ohtani N., Ohta M., Sakuma Y. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science 348, 333–336. 10.1126/science.1261022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Nagasawa M., Mogi K., Ohtsuki H., Kikusui T. (2020). Familiarity with humans affect dogs' tendencies to follow human majority groups. Sci. Rep. 10:7119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ohkita M., Nagasawa M., Kazutaka M., Kikusui T. (2016). Owners' direct gazes increase dogs' attention-getting behaviors. Behav. Process. 125:96. 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.02.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Pongrácz P., Szapu J. S., Faragó T. (2019). Cats (Felis silvestris catus) read human gaze for referential information. Intelligence 74, 43–52. 10.1016/j.intell.2018.11.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Schwab C., Huber L. (2006). Obey or not obey? Dogs (Canis familiaris) behave differently in response to attentional states of their owners. J. Comp. Psychol. 120:169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Téglás E., Gergely A., Kupán K., Miklósi Á, Topál J. (2012). Dogs' gaze following is tuned to human communicative signals. Curr. Biol. 22:209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES