Skip to main content
ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters logoLink to ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters
. 2021 Mar 1;12(3):502–507. doi: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00045

Peripherally Crowded Cationic Phthalocyanines as Efficient Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy

Marie Halaskova , Asma Rahali ‡,§, Verónica Almeida-Marrero , Miloslav Machacek , Radim Kucera , Bassem Jamoussi §, Tomás Torres ‡,∥,⊥,*, Veronika Novakova †,*, Andrés de la Escosura ‡,∥,*, Petr Zimcik †,*
PMCID: PMC7958147  PMID: 33738078

Abstract

graphic file with name ml1c00045_0006.jpg

Photodynamic therapy is a treatment modality of cancer based on the production of cytotoxic species upon the light activation of photosensitizers. Zinc phthalocyanine photosensitizers bearing four or eight bulky 2,6-di(pyridin-3-yl)phenoxy substituents were synthesized, and pyridyl moieties were methylated. The quaternized derivatives did not aggregate at all in water and retained their good photophysical properties. High photodynamic activity of these phthalocyanines was demonstrated on HeLa, MCF-7, and EA.hy926 cells with a very low EC50 of 50 nM (for the MCF-7 cell line) upon light activation while maintaining low toxicity in the dark (TC50 ≈ 600 μM), giving thus good phototherapeutic indexes (TC50/EC50) above 1400. The compounds localized primarily in the lysosomes, leading to their rupture after light activation. This induced an apoptotic cell death pathway with secondary necrosis because of extensive and swift damage to the cells. This work demonstrates the importance of a bulky and rigid arrangement of peripheral substituents in the development of photosensitizers.

Keywords: Phthalocyanine, singlet oxygen, fluorescence, aggregation, phototoxicity, photodynamic therapy


Cancer is the second leading cause of death globally, accounting for one in six deaths in 2018, and its burdens continue to grow worldwide.1 The treatment of all cancer types has not yet been solved, making investigations in this area of extraordinary high interest. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a modern method of cancer treatment, alternative to surgery or radiation therapy. It is characterized by noninvasive character, the possibility of targeting, and no serious long-term side effects, which may occur during other cancer treatment modalities.25 PDT uses special drugs, i.e., photosensitizers (PSs), along with excitation light and ubiquitous molecular oxygen to generate singlet oxygen that kills the cancer cells.

Previous studies have shown the great potential of phthalocyanines (Pcs) to become optimal PSs and revealed the basic structure–activity relationships.69 Upon light activation, Pcs are able to transfer energy to molecular oxygen, producing toxic singlet oxygen. They typically absorb light in the optical window of tissues (i.e., 650–850 nm), with high extinction coefficients of over 100 000 M–1cm–1. Such light penetrates deeply, which contrasts other well-known PSs, e.g., porphyrins, whose main absorption band (Soret band) lies typically at lower wavelengths (∼400 nm). Bulky substituents on the Pcs’ periphery are necessary to hinder undesirable aggregation, which would otherwise lead to the loss of photodynamic properties. However, this may not be sufficient in aqueous media, where the π–π interactions between planar and strongly hydrophobic Pc cores are extraordinarily strong. Various surfactants10,11 or delivery systems1215 have been reported to solve this obstacle, yet these systems may render in vitro evaluation and practical use difficult. From this point of view, the introduction of bulky charged substituents that suppress aggregation by repulsion forces is the most promising strategy.1620 Among charged species, cationic Pcs have been recently demonstrated to possess better in vitro PDT efficiencies than the anionic Pcs.21,22 This fact was explained by an effect of environmental pH in cell compartments on Pcs’ ionization, by their different binding to serum proteins, interaction with biomembranes, subcellular localization, and relocalization after irradiation.

The motivation of this project was to evaluate how the rigidity of peripheral patterns, their number, and charge state (neutral or quaternized) are fundamental for achieving a high PDT efficiency of Pcs. For this purpose, the peripherally crowded Pcs 1, 1Me, 2, and 2Me containing 8 or 16 pyridyl moieties (neutral or quaternized) were designed (Chart 1), synthesized, and described from the photophysical point of view, and their photodynamic properties were evaluated in detail through in vitro studies. Zinc(II) as a central metal ion was chosen for its known good coordination stability in the Pc core, its straightforward synthetic availability, and, especially, its increasing singlet oxygen production based on the heavy atom effect.6,7,2325 Moreover, the selection of compounds was based on the recent positive preliminary results with 2Me, which was shown to be highly photoactive in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) after immobilization on tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) protein crystals, for use as heterogeneous catalysts in continuous-flow oxidation processes.26

Chart 1. Structures of the Target Pcs.

Chart 1

The preparation of tetrasubstituted Pc 1 started with the synthesis of 4-(2,6-di(pyridin-3-yl)phenoxy)phthalonitrile, using (2,6-di(pyridin-3-yl)phenol)26 and 4-nitrophthalonitrile as precursors, obtaining the product in 71% yield. Cyclotetramerization of this phthalonitrile in pentan-1-ol and with DBU as a base, at 140 °C, afforded Pc 1 in 6% yield, which was purified by column chromatography using a mixture of CHCl3/MeOH (10:0.5) with 1% of pyridine, followed by size exclusion chromatography in Bio-Beads using DCM as an eluent. Alkylation of the pyridyloxy groups using methyl iodide in DMF afforded Pc 1Me in 82% yield (Scheme 1). Pcs 2 and 2Me were prepared using a previously described procedure.26 All products were fully characterized by NMR, mass spectrometry, IR, and UV–vis. Importantly, the correlation of intensities between aromatic protons and the N-methyl groups in the 1H NMR spectrum, together with a clear peak for the molecular ion in the HR-MS spectrum, confirmed the full quaternization of the pyridine moieties in Pcs 1Me and 2Me. The purity of the samples was assessed by HPLC and was found to be over 95% for all samples. Additionally, three peaks of positional isomers with different Q-band shapes of absorption spectra were detected during HPLC analysis of 1 (Figure S8), with abundances of 10, 77, and 11% (the middle peak most likely contained two isomers). However, assignment of the peaks to individual isomers was not possible. The isomers were not separated in 1Me, but a small difference in the absorption spectra in the ascending, top, and descending parts of the chromatographic peak indicated their presence.

Scheme 1. Synthesis of Pcs 1 and 1Me.

Scheme 1

(i) K2CO3, DMSO, 18 h, 90°C, 71%; (ii) Zn(OAc)2, DBU, pentan-1-ol, 48 h, 140°C, 6%; (iii) CH3I, DMF, 12 h, 120°C, 82%.

All the prepared Pcs showed absorption spectra in DMF that are typical for monomeric Pcs, with sharp Q-bands over 680 nm and B-bands at approximately 360 nm (Table 1 and Figure 1). Evidently, quaternization did not affect the position and the shape of the Q-bands. Negligible splitting in the Q-band of 1 was the result of the presence of positional isomers, since these Pcs were prepared from monosubstituted phthalonitrile. The splitting was not observed for 1Me after quaternization. The absorption spectra of nonquaternized Pcs recorded in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, the same results were obtained in water) differed significantly from those in DMF. A significant decrease of the Q-band intensity and appearance of a new blueshifted band of 1 indicated strong aggregation of this Pc under aqueous conditions (Figure 1a). Although the sharp Q-band of Pc 2, with only decreased intensity and slight broadening, suggested its presence in the monomeric form, no fluorescence was emitted from the PBS or water solutions (Figure 1c). Similar observations have been reported for extremely bulky phenoxy-substituted Pcs and were ascribed to the formation of atypical aggregates that do not differ from monomers in the shape of the absorption spectrum.20,27,28 The absorption spectra of quaternized Pcs 1Me and 2Me in PBS, in turn, were also characteristic of the monomeric form and perfectly overlapped the spectra in DMF. In contrast to Pc 2, a strong fluorescence emission was preserved this case. The fully monomeric characters of 1Me and 2Me in water, which are a crucial prerequisite for obtaining good PDT properties in vitro, were further proven spectroscopically based on the accordance of the shape of excitation fluorescence spectra with the corresponding absorption spectra (Figure S13). The shape of the absorption spectra did not change, even at a concentration of 100 μM (Figure S13), indicating a very efficient inhibition of Pc aggregation by this extremely rigid arrangement of quaternized peripheral substituents.

Table 1. Photophysical Properties of Studied Compoundsa.

cpd. solvent λA, nm λF, nm ΦF (absol/comp) τF, ns ΦΔ (phos/chem) τΔ, μs
1 DMF 682 689 0.29/0.25 2.89 0.60/0.59 17.7
1Me DMF 684 692 0.18/0.17 2.19 0.57/0.51 15.2
PBS 684 695 0.17/0.19 2.83 - -
2 DMF 681 687 0.29/0.28 3.15 0.59/0.56 18.7
2Me DMF 693 701 0.16/0.18 2.17 0.58/0.49 17.4
PBS 690 700 0.16/0.16 2.34 - -
a

Absorption maximum (λA); emission maximum (λF); fluorescence quantum yield (ΦF) determined either by the absolute method (absol) or comparative method (comp) (for details, see the Supporting Information); singlet oxygen quantum yield (ΦΔ) determined either by the phosphorescence method (phos) or by the chemical method (chem) (for details, see the Supporting Information); fluorescence lifetime (τF); singlet oxygen lifetime (τΔ). Fluorescence lifetimes (τF) were determined using laser with λexc = 653.9 nm.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Absorption spectra of compounds 1 (a), 1Me (b), 2 (c), and 2Me (d) in water (red), PBS (black), and DMF (blue) at a 1 μM concentration. The solutions of 1 and 2 were diluted from 100 μM DMSO stock solution. The inset in figure (c) shows the fluorescence of the DMF (left) and PBS (right) solutions (1 μM) of compound 2exc = 366 nm).

Photophysical properties, especially quantum yields of singlet oxygen production (ΦΔ), can suggest the impact of the studied Pcs for PDT. Fluorescence emission defined by fluorescence quantum yields (ΦF) may be used for bioimaging and to localize PSs at the subcellular level or in the tissues. Two different methods have been employed for the determination of both ΦΔ and ΦF values in DMF to confirm the accuracy of the obtained data. DMF was a solvent of choice, because it ensures good solubility of the whole series, guarantees the monomeric character of compounds, and provides a relevant published value of ΦΔ of unsubstituted zinc phthalocyanine, used as a reference in the chemical method (see below). The data are summarized in Table 1. The ΦΔ values were determined with unsubstituted zinc Pc as the reference, using either the chemical method with 1,3-diphenylisobenzofuran as a selective scavenger of singlet oxygen or by the phosphorescence method observing phosphorescence of generated singlet oxygen at 1276 nm (Figure S12). The value of the singlet oxygen lifetime (τΔ) was about 17 μs for all the samples, which is in accordance with the data published in the literature.29 All prepared Pcs were characterized by ΦΔ values of 0.49–0.60 in DMF, which is in good agreement with the data previously published for similar zinc Pcs,19,20 confirming their monomeric character and indicating the great potential of these derivatives for photodynamic treatments. For the determination of the ΦF value (in DMF and PBS), an absolute method using an integrating sphere and a relative method using zinc Pc as the reference were used. In addition, in this case, the obtained ΦF values corresponded each other, thus proving the relevance of the measured data. Interestingly, the nonquaternized compounds 1 and 2 possessed a higher ΦF in DMF, close to 0.30, whereas ΦF values of the corresponding quaternized analogues 1Me and 2Me were in the range of 0.16–0.19. The identical values of ΦF for 1Me and 2Me were also determined in PBS, further confirming the monomeric character of 1Me and 2Me under aqueous conditions and making the following in vitro experiments reasonable. Fluorescence lifetimes (τF) ranged from 2.17–3.15 ns and correlated well with ΦF values. For 1 and 2, in turn, no fluorescence was detected in PBS due to aggregation.

All four prepared compounds were subsequently evaluated in vitro on the various cell lines—human cervical carcinoma (HeLa), human breast carcinoma (MCF-7), nonmalignant mouse fibroblasts (3T3), and immortalized human endothelial cells (EA.hy926). Their photodynamic activity after activation by light (λ > 570 nm, 11.2 J cm–2) was expressed as the half-maximal effective concentration (EC50), while the inherent toxicity without activation (dark toxicity) was expressed as the half-maximal toxic concentration (TC50); see Figures 2 and S17. The nonquaternized derivatives 1 and 2 precipitated above a 1 μM concentration in the cell-culture medium without any detectable toxicity toward HeLa cells either in the dark or upon activation. This is a consequence of the above-discussed tendency toward aggregation in water-based media, leading to inactive forms of PSs, for which these compounds were not evaluated further. Conversely, both quaternized Pcs 1Me and 2Me induced concentration-dependent toxicity upon light activation on all cell lines (Table 2). Both Pcs appeared to be most active against MCF-7 cells with EC50 values of ∼0.049 μM. Approximately an order of magnitude lower activity was observed against HeLa cells. The results of both Pcs on nonmalignant 3T3 cells differed substantially. While high toxicity was determined for 2Me, statistically significant lower phototoxicity was observed for 1Me in comparison with MCF-7 cells (p = 0.049, Welch’s t test). This suggests that 1Me may have a beneficial effect in the PDT treatment, and even after light activation, it may efficiently destroy some types of carcinoma cells while preserving surrounding healthy tissues to some degree. Nevertheless, the results do not exclude 2Me from further studies, since the selectivity in PDT is primarily driven by irradiation of the target areas only. Moreover, this compound exerted much better photoactivity than 1Me independently of the type of cell line. In comparison with clinically approved PS, both studied compounds appeared to be very efficient; their activity was much higher than for the sulfonated hydroxyaluminum Pc (S3AlOHPc) that has been approved in clinical practice in Russia under the trade name Photosens. EC50 values determined for S3AlOHPc by our research group under the identical experimental conditions were higher than 2 μM for all cell lines tested (see Table 2). Photodynamic treatment of HeLa cells using both investigated compounds without any previous incubation, i.e., irradiation, started immediately after the application of dyes (Figure S18), resulted in EC50 values of 1.28 ± 0.68 and 0.178 ± 0.024 μM for 1Me and 2Me, respectively. Even though a decrease in activity was expected, both compounds were proven to maintain their photodynamic activity well. This preservation of photodynamic activity may be utilized in PDT modalities where omission of a PS’s uptake (or its ample reduction) is conveniently availed (e.g., in vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy). Therefore, a similar experiment utilizing human endothelial cells (EA.hy926) was conducted, with comparable results (Table 2). The dark toxicities of both quaternized compounds were low (TC50 > 600 μM, Figures 2 and S17 and Table 2) and were either comparable or even lower than those of similar hydrophilic multicationic compounds.21 Phototherapeutic indicies (i.e., TC50/EC50 ratios) revealed very favorable values (HeLa cells) of 1409 and 5691 for 1Me and 2Me, respectively.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

(a) Photodynamic activity of compound 1Me on 3T3 (red), HeLa (black), and MCF-7 (blue) cells (λ > 570 nm, 12.4 mW cm–2, 15 min, 11.2 J cm–2) and dark toxicity of 1Me on HeLa cells (green). (b) Subcellular localization of 1Me (red) in HeLa cells. Cells were stained for mitochondria (green) and lysosomes (blue) by organelle-specific fluorescent probes. (c) The intensity profiles of 1Me (red), lysosomes (blue), and mitochondria (green) alongside the white bar shown in part (b).

Table 2. Comparison of Uptake, Dark Toxicity (TC50 Values), and Photodynamic Activity (EC50 Values) of Studied Pcs in Different Cell Linesa.

    EC50 (μM)
TC50 (μM) TC50/EC50
cpd. uptake (nmol per mg of protein), HeLa HeLa MCF-7 3T3 EA.hy926e HeLae HeLa HeLa
1 - >1b - - -   >1b -
1Me 0.26 0.48 ± 0.25 0.050 ± 0.014 2.12 ± 1.4 3.43 ± 0.61 1.28 ± 0.68 675 ± 17 1409
2 - >1b - - -   >1b -
2Me 0.50 0.11 ± 0.027 0.047 ± 0.016 0.068 ± 0.029 0.50 ± 0.07 0.18 ± 0.024 601 ± 6 5691
S3AlOHPc   2.07 ± 0.29c 2.04 ± 0.31d 2.37 ± 0.63d -   >1500d >725
a

Data are presented as the TC50 or EC50 values ± standard deviations. TC50/EC50 refers to the phototherapeutic index. Irradiation conditions: λ > 570 nm, 12.4 mW cm–2, 15 min, 11.2 J cm–2. At least three independent experiments each in quadruplicate were performed.

b

The compounds precipitated above this concentration.

c

Data from ref (31).

d

Data from ref (21).

e

Without preincubation. The cells were irradiated immediately after application of Pc.

Active Pcs 1Me and 2Me were further studied in detail on HeLa cells. Their uptake after 12 h of incubation reached values of 0.26 and 0.50 nmol per mg of protein, which are comparable with those of other multicationic Pcs.21 Uptake of quaternized compounds led to their accumulation in the endolysosomal compartment of HeLa cells, as confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Figures 2b,c, S15 and S16). Unfortunately, both compounds photobleached quickly in the cells. Together with rather rapid relocalization to the cytoplasm, these aspects made 1Me and 2Me difficult to image in their primary subcellular localization (endosomes and lysosomes). The entire rapid process of photoactivation with a violent burst-like release from lysosomes accompanied by further successive photobleaching is shown in the instructive video of irradiation of HeLa cells treated with 1Me (Supporting Information). This boisterous relocalization process with simultaneous oxidative damage to cellular components can lead to cell death. With lysosomes as the primary site of photodynamic damage, irradiation of the cells leads to activation of extrinsic- and intrinsic-pathway initiator caspases 8 and 9, respectively, and executioner caspases 3/7 at the same time, presumably by lysosomal enzyme cleavage of pro-caspases (Figures 3a and S19). Using annexin V luciferase fusion proteins and a DNA-binding probe allowed for real-time monitoring of cell demise. Exposure of phosphatidylserine, monitored as an increase of the luminescence signal, began readily after irradiation, followed by the increase in fluorescence after an apparent lag as a result of the subsequent loss of membrane integrity during secondary necrosis (Figures 3b–e and S20). This lag between the inception of the increase in both signals can be used to distinguish between apoptosis followed by secondary necrosis (observed as pronounced delay) and primary necrosis (observed as short or absent delay between an increase in luminescence and fluorescence signals).30 A substantial delay (>5 h) is observable in apoptosis-positive controls (camptothecin and bortezomib as the inducers of intrinsic-pathway-mediated apoptosis (Figure S20) and FasL and TRAIL as the extrinsic-pathway inducers (Figures 3e and S20), while both studied compounds displayed evidence of secondary necrosis faster at higher dosages (even within 3.5 h after light activation). Hydrogen peroxide (which is known to induce oxidative damage and necrosis) resulted in initiation of the loss of membrane integrity within half an hour after addition to the cells, which is in accordance with the necrotic type of cell death. Digitonin (necrosis via cellular membrane permeabilization) induced devastating nonapoptotic cell death even more rapidly (Figure 3d). Cell death processes after light-induced photodynamic action of 1Me and 2Me involves the initial induction of apoptosis, but thanks to extensive and swift damage to the cells by a higher dosage of PSs, secondary necrosis might take over even within 3.5 h.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Cell death determinations: (a) Caspases 3/7 (green), 8 (red), and 9 (blue) activities for 2Me in different times after irradiation. (b–e) Annexin V (green) and DNA-binding probe (red) binding profiles for 2Me, at EC15 (b) and EC85 (c), digitonin (d; necrosis control), and FasL (e; apoptosis control).

In conclusion, this work has demonstrated that an efficient rigid arrangement of peripheral cationic substituents on the aromatic core of Pcs efficiently inhibits aggregation, even in water. This keeps the PS molecules exclusively in a monomolecular state, which is very important for providing good photophysical properties and concomitantly high photodynamic activity. This outcome was demonstrated on cancerous cell lines for the cationic compounds 1Me and 2Me, providing much better EC50 values than the clinically approved S3AlOHPc. Further in vitro investigation revealed that the main cell demise pathway is through apoptosis with subsequent secondary necrosis after the rupture of the lysosomal vesicles, i.e., the organelles of primary subcellular localization. Therefore, the concept of introducing charged moieties on the rigid peripheral substituents was confirmed as a highly viable approach for delivering novel, highly active PSs.

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation (19-14758Y), Charles University (PRIMUS/20/SCI/013, GAUK 1620219, SVV 260 550), and by the project EFSA-CDN (No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000841) cofunded by the ERDF. For affiliations ‡, ∥, and ⊥, the work was supported by MINECO-Feder funds (CTQ2017-85393-P (T.T.), CTQ-2014-53673-P and CTQ-2017-89539-P (A.d.l.E.), PCIN-2017-042/EuroNanoMed2017-191, TEMPEAT (T.T.)). Affiliation ⊥ (IMDEA Nanociencia) also acknowledges support from the ‘Severo Ochoa’ Programme for Centres of Excellence in R&D (MINECO, Grant SEV-2016-0686).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.1c00045.

  • Synthesis, full characterization of target products, additional absorption spectra, NMR spectra, experimental parts (PDF)

  • Photodynamic activity of 1Me on HeLa cells (MP4)

Author Contributions

# M.H. and A.R. contributed equally.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ml1c00045_si_002.mp4 (29.3MB, mp4)

References

  1. World Health Organization. Cancer. 2018. https://www.who.int/health-topics/cancer#tab=tab_1.
  2. Hamblin M. R. Photodynamic Therapy for Cancer: What’s Past is Prologue. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020, 96 (3), 506–516. 10.1111/php.13190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. van Straten D.; Mashayekhi V.; de Bruijn H. S.; Oliveira S.; Robinson D. J. Oncologic Photodynamic Therapy: Basic Principles, Current Clinical Status and Future Directions. Cancers 2017, 9 (12), 19. 10.3390/cancers9020019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. MacDonald I. J.; Dougherty T. J. Basic principles of photodynamic therapy. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2001, 5 (2), 105–129. 10.1002/jpp.328. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Frochot C.; Mordon S. Update of the situation of clinical photodynamic therapy in Europe in the 2003–2018 period. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2019, 23 (04n05), 347–357. 10.1142/S1088424619300027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Claessens C. G.; Hahn U.; Torres T. Phthalocyanines: From outstanding electronic properties to emerging applications. Chem. Rec. 2008, 8 (2), 75–97. 10.1002/tcr.20139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lo P. C.; Rodriguez-Morgade M. S.; Pandey R. K.; Ng D. K. P.; Torres T.; Dumoulin F. The unique features and promises of phthalocyanines as advanced photosensitisers for photodynamic therapy of cancer. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2020, 49 (4), 1041–1056. 10.1039/C9CS00129H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Li X.; Zheng B. D.; Peng X. H.; Li S. Z.; Ying J. W.; Zhao Y. Y.; Huang J. D.; Yoon J. Phthalocyanines as medicinal photosensitizers: Developments in the last five years. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 379, 147–160. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.08.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wong R. C. H.; Lo P. C.; Ng D. K. P. Stimuli responsive phthalocyanine-based fluorescent probes and photosensitizers. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019, 379, 30–46. 10.1016/j.ccr.2017.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lau J. T. F.; Lo P.-C.; Jiang X.-J.; Wang Q.; Ng D. K. P. A Dual Activatable Photosensitizer toward Targeted Photodynamic Therapy. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 57 (10), 4088–4097. 10.1021/jm500456e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Chow S. Y. S.; Lo P.-C.; Ng D. K. P. An acid-cleavable phthalocyanine tetramer as an activatable photosensitiser for photodynamic therapy. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45 (33), 13021–13024. 10.1039/C6DT02283A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhen Z.; Tang W.; Guo C.; Chen H.; Lin X.; Liu G.; Fei B.; Chen X.; Xu B.; Xie J. Ferritin Nanocages To Encapsulate and Deliver Photosensitizers for Efficient Photodynamic Therapy against Cancer. ACS Nano 2013, 7 (8), 6988–6996. 10.1021/nn402199g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lucky S. S.; Soo K. C.; Zhang Y. Nanoparticles in Photodynamic Therapy. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115 (4), 1990–2042. 10.1021/cr5004198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Almeida-Marrero V.; van de Winckel E.; Anaya-Plaza E.; Torres T.; de la Escosura A. Porphyrinoid biohybrid materials as an emerging toolbox for biomedical light management. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018, 47 (19), 7369–7400. 10.1039/C7CS00554G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Setaro F.; Wennink J. W. H.; Mäkinen P. I.; Holappa L.; Trohopoulos P. N.; Ylä-Herttuala S.; van Nostrum C. F.; de la Escosura A.; Torres T. Amphiphilic phthalocyanines in polymeric micelles: a supramolecular approach toward efficient third-generation photosensitizers. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8 (2), 282–289. 10.1039/C9TB02014D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brilkina A. A.; Dubasova L. V.; Sergeeva E. A.; Pospelov A. J.; Shilyagina N. Y.; Shakhova N. M.; Balalaeva I. V. Photobiological properties of phthalocyanine photosensitizers Photosens, Holosens and Phthalosens: A comparative in vitro analysis. J. Photochem. Photobiol., B 2019, 191, 128–134. 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2018.12.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Venkatramaiah N.; Pereira P. M. R.; Almeida Paz F. A.; Ribeiro C. A. F.; Fernandes R.; Tome J. P. C. Dual functionality of phosphonic-acid-appended phthalocyanines: inhibitors of urokinase plasminogen activator and anticancer photodynamic agents. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (85), 15550–15553. 10.1039/C5CC06561E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Li X. S.; Ke M. R.; Zhang M. F.; Tang Q. Q.; Zheng B. Y.; Huang J. D. A non-aggregated and tumour-associated macrophage-targeted photosensitiser for photodynamic therapy: a novel zinc(II) phthalocyanine containing octa-sulphonates. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51 (22), 4704–4707. 10.1039/C4CC09934F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Makhseed S.; Machacek M.; Alfadly W.; Tuhl A.; Vinodh M.; Simunek T.; Novakova V.; Kubat P.; Rudolf E.; Zimcik P. Water-soluble non-aggregating zinc phthalocyanine and in vitro studies for photodynamic therapy. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49 (95), 11149–11151. 10.1039/c3cc44609c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Ghazal B.; Machacek M.; Shalaby M. A.; Novakova V.; Zimcik P.; Makhseed S. Phthalocyanines and Tetrapyrazinoporphyrazines with Two Cationic Donuts: High Photodynamic Activity as a Result of Rigid Spatial Arrangement of Peripheral Substituents. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60 (14), 6060–6076. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.7b00272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kollar J.; Machacek M.; Halaskova M.; Lenco J.; Kucera R.; Demuth J.; Rohlickova M.; Hasonova K.; Miletin M.; Novakova V.; Zimcik P. Cationic Versus Anionic Phthalocyanines for Photodynamic Therapy: What a Difference the Charge Makes. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63 (14), 7616–7632. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van de Winckel E.; David B.; Simoni M. M.; González-Delgado J. A.; de la Escosura A.; Cunha Â.; Torres T. Octacationic and axially di-substituted silicon (IV) phthalocyanines for photodynamic inactivation of bacteria. Dyes Pigm. 2017, 145, 239–245. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.06.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Novakova V.; Donzello M. P.; Ercolani C.; Zimcik P.; Stuzhin P. A. Tetrapyrazinoporphyrazines and their metal derivatives. Part II: Electronic structure, electrochemical, spectral, photophysical and other application related properties. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2018, 361, 1–73. 10.1016/j.ccr.2018.01.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Tuhl A.; Makhseed S.; Zimcik P.; Al-Awadi N.; Novakova V.; Samuel J. Heavy metal effects on physicochemical properties of non-aggregated azaphthalocyanine derivatives. J. Porphyrins Phthalocyanines 2012, 16 (7–8), 817–825. 10.1142/S1088424612500800. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Svec J.; Zimcik P.; Novakova L.; Rakitin O. A.; Amelichev S. A.; Stuzhin P. A.; Novakova V. 1,2,5-Chalcogenadiazole-Annulated Tripyrazinoporphyrazines: Synthesis, Spectral Characteristics, and Influence of the Heavy Atom Effect on Their Photophysical Properties. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2015, 2015 (3), 596–604. 10.1002/ejoc.201403329. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Anaya-Plaza E.; Aljarilla A.; Beaune G.; Nonappa; Timonen J. V. I.; de la Escosura A.; Torres T.; Kostiainen M. A. Phthalocyanine–Virus Nanofibers as Heterogeneous Catalysts for Continuous-Flow Photo-Oxidation Processes. Adv. Mater. 2019, 31 (39), 1902582. 10.1002/adma.201902582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Makhseed S.; Tuhl A.; Samuel J.; Zimcik P.; Al-Awadi N.; Novakova V. New highly soluble phenoxy-substituted phthalocyanine and azaphthalocyanine derivatives: Synthesis, photochemical and photophysical studies and atypical aggregation behavior. Dyes Pigm. 2012, 95 (2), 351–357. 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.03.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Anaya-Plaza E.; Joseph J.; Bauroth S.; Wagner M.; Dolle C.; Sekita M.; Gröhn F.; Spiecker E.; Clark T.; de la Escosura A.; Guldi D. M.; Torres T. Synergy of Electrostatic and π–π Interactions in the Realization of Nanoscale Artificial Photosynthetic Model Systems. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2020, 59 (42), 18786–18794. 10.1002/anie.202006014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Wilkinson F.; Helman W. P.; Ross A. B. Rate Constants for the Decay and Reactions of the Lowest Electronically Excited Singlet-State of Molecular-Oxygen in Solution - an Expanded and Revised Compilation. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 1995, 24 (2), 663–1021. 10.1063/1.555965. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kupcho K.; Shultz J.; Hurst R.; Hartnett J.; Zhou W.; Machleidt T.; Grailer J.; Worzella T.; Riss T.; Lazar D.; Cali J. J.; Niles A. A real-time, bioluminescent annexin V assay for the assessment of apoptosis. Apoptosis 2019, 24 (1), 184–197. 10.1007/s10495-018-1502-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Machacek M.; Demuth J.; Cermak P.; Vavreckova M.; Hruba L.; Jedlickova A.; Kubat P.; Simunek T.; Novakova V.; Zimcik P. Tetra(3,4-pyrido)porphyrazines Caught in the Cationic Cage: Toward Nanomolar Active Photosensitizers. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59 (20), 9443–9456. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ml1c00045_si_002.mp4 (29.3MB, mp4)

Articles from ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES