Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Juvenile xanthogranuloma is a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis primarily affecting children. The purpose of this study was to characterize the imaging features of histologically confirmed pediatric head and neck juvenile xanthogranuloma.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A retrospective review was performed of medical records and imaging of histologically confirmed head and neck juvenile xanthogranuloma.
RESULTS:
Ten patients (6 girls, 4 boys) 1 month to 12 years of age were imaged with ultrasound only (n = 1), CT only (n = 2), CT and ultrasound (n = 1), MR imaging only (n = 3), or MR imaging and CT (n = 3). Masses were solitary in 9 patients and multiple in 1. Solitary masses were located in the external auditory canal, infra-auricular region, infratemporal fossa with intracranial extension, frontal scalp, and subperiosteal space eroding the calvaria and along the dura. One patient with disseminated disease had scalp-, calvarial-, and dural-based masses. Clinical presentation included a mass or alteration in function. On sonography, juvenile xanthogranuloma appeared hypoechoic. On contrast-enhanced CT, masses appeared homogeneous and isoattenuating with muscle and sometimes eroded bone. On MR imaging, compared with the cerebral cortex, the masses appeared hyper- or isointense on T1 and hypo- or isointense on T2, had decreased diffusivity, and enhanced homogeneously. Juvenile xanthogranuloma was not included in the differential diagnosis in any case.
CONCLUSIONS:
Head and neck juvenile xanthogranuloma has varied manifestations. Mild hyperintensity on T1, hypointensity on T2 compared with the cerebral cortex, decreased diffusivity, and homogeneous enhancement are characteristic. Awareness of these features should prompt radiologists to include juvenile xanthogranuloma in the differential diagnosis of pediatric head and neck masses.
Juvenile xanthogranuloma (JXG) is a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis that typically presents as a well-circumscribed nodule or mass, containing attenuated infiltrates of histiocytes and a variable number of admixed multinucleate Touton giant cells and inflammatory cells. The cell of origin in JXG is debated; the cells have immunohistochemical features of both macrophages and dendritic cells.1 Approximately 20% of JXGs are noted at birth; 70%, in the first year of life; and only 10%, in adulthood. Localized dermal involvement is the most common presentation; two-thirds of the lesions are solitary.2 Extracutaneous involvement is less common, with approximately 50% of lesions located within the head and neck (HN) region.2 Extracutaneous HN JXG has been reported in locations such as the tympanic membrane, nasal cavity, tongue, orbit and paranasal sinus, subglottis, cervical spine, skull base including the temporal bone, intracranial compartment, and HN muscles.2–21
Cutaneous JXG typically presents as a solitary macule or papule with a flesh-colored, erythematous, or yellowish hue.2 In such cases, radiographic imaging is not indicated. In extracutaneous sites, JXG is more difficult to diagnose and imaging can be misleading because an infiltrative appearance may mimic malignancy.2,22 Previous reports detailing the radiographic features of JXG are limited to case reports and several small series or to a limited description of imaging within the context of a clinicopathologic report.2–21
The purpose of this study was to provide detailed characterization of the ultrasound (US), CT, and MR imaging features of JXG in the HN region.
Materials and Methods
Boston Children's Hospital institutional review board approval was obtained for a retrospective review of pathologically confirmed pediatric cases of JXG. The pathology data base at Boston Children's Hospital was searched for all reports containing the text “xanthog” in patients younger than 19 years of age from December 1997 to December 2013. Cases were included only if the incisional or excisional biopsy met histologic criteria for JXG. The site of each biopsy was recorded. Patients with biopsies showing JXG involving the HN were studied further by review of their pathology and radiology records. Pathology was reviewed by a pediatric pathologist. Radiology examinations were reviewed by a pediatric neuroradiologist with approximately 20 years of experience and a neuroradiology fellow. For patients who were imaged with sonography, CT, and/or MR imaging, original images were reviewed in detail. The maximum lesion diameter on the presenting imaging examination was recorded. The attenuation of the lesions was compared with that of muscle by visual inspection on available noncontrast and postcontrast CT images. MR imaging technical parameters were as follows: T1-weighted images: TR/TE, 427–667/10–25 ms; NEX, 2; matrix, 205–256 × 256–512; FOV, 15–22 × 18–27 cm; T2-weighted sequences: TR/TE, 2693–5800/86–120 ms; NEX, 1–2; matrix, 179–256 × 320–512; FOV, 15–20 × 18–25 cm; fast spin-echo inversion recovery sequences: TR/TE, 4000/45 ms; NEX, 2; matrix, 256 × 512; FOV, 22 × 28 cm; and diffusion-weighted sequences: TR/TE, 8300/93 ms; NEX, 1; matrix, 128 × 128; FOV, 18–26 × 22–32 cm; b-value, 1000). Contrast-enhanced images of extracranial lesions were obtained with similar parameters with fat-suppression. Lesion signal intensity on T1-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted or fast spin-echo inversion recovery sequences was designated as hypointense, isointense, or hyperintense with respect to the signal intensity of the cerebral cortex, based on visual inspection. The presence of enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted sequences within the lesions was characterized as homogeneous versus heterogeneous. ADC maps were generated from diffusion-weighted images, and whole-lesion average ADC measurements were obtained by using a freehand ROI. The differential diagnosis provided on the original radiology reports was assessed for the 9 patients for whom the histopathologic diagnosis of JXG was not known at the time of imaging.
Results
During a 16-year period, there were 114 children with a histologic diagnosis of JXG. Lesions involved the skin in 107 (94%) of these patients. Multiple lesions were present in 8 patients. Imaging was performed in 14 of 114 (12%) patients. Imaged lesions involved the skin and subcutaneous tissues (back, chest, neck, scalp, and groin), abdominal wall rectus sheath, paraspinal muscles, liver, neck, skull, and external auditory meatus. The HN was involved in 67 of 114 (59%) patients. Sites of cutaneous HN involvement included the forehead, cheek, nose, chin, ear, eyelid, lip, neck, and scalp. Review of pathologic features in all cases revealed diagnostic features of JXG (Fig 1). The features included an infiltrate of variably xanthomatized mononuclear histiocyte-like cells. Touton giant cells were seen in all except 1 case, and eosinophils and lymphocytes were seen in most cases.
Ten patients had imaging of HN lesions. The 6 female and 4 male patients ranged in age from 1 month to 12 years at the time of imaging, with 8 children younger than 1 year of age. Their clinical presentations and initial radiologic diagnoses based on the imaging findings are summarized in Table 1. US only was performed in 1 patient; US and CT, in 1 patient; CT only, in 2 patients; MR imaging only, in 3; and both MR imaging and CT, in 3. Imaging characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Lesions were solitary in 9 children and multiple in 1 patient who had disseminated disease. Maximum diameters of the lesions in the 10 patients ranged from 2 to 60 mm.
Table 1:
Case | Age, Sex | Clinical Presentation | Location | Radiographic Diagnosis |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 10 yr, F | Mass and bloody otorrhea for 10 days | External auditory canal, polypoid mass | Polyp |
2 | 4 mo, M | Mass and bloody discharge for 1 month | External auditory canal, subcutaneous tissues | Sebaceous cyst, dermoid or branchial cleft cyst |
3 | 3 mo, M | Reddish-blue nodule for 2 days | Infra-auricular, subcutaneous, and cutaneous | Lymph node, pilomatrixoma, nontuberculous mycobacterial infection |
4 | 1 mo, M | Facial weakness, otorrhea for 1 month | Infratemporal fossa, middle ear space, bony erosion, intracranial, temporal lobe edema | LCH, neuroblastoma |
5 | 7 mo, F | Scalp mass for 2 weeks | Subperiosteal with outer table erosion, parietal bone | Neuroblastoma metastasis, LCH, fibromatosis, other malignant tumor |
6 | 4 mo, F | Enlarging scalp mass for 6 weeks | Cutaneous edema, subcutaneous scalp mass over coronal suture | Dermoid |
7 | 1 mo, F | Mass over nose since birth | Subcutaneous tissue, midline nasofrontal | Neuroglial heterotopia |
8 | 10 mo, F | Enlarging mass over nose for 3 weeks | Subperiosteal with outer table erosion, midline frontal | LCH, metastasis such as neuroblastoma, other malignant tumor |
9 | 12 yr, F | Tremor for 6 months, recent seizure | Intracranial, extra-axial; frontal lobe edema | Tumor not otherwise specified |
10 | 9 mo, M | Multiple skin lesions since birth, occipital lesion for 4 weeks | Innumerable scalp lesions; occipital calvarial, epidural; intracranial parietal dural-based | Referred for imaging with known diagnosis of JXG |
Table 2:
Case | Size (mm) | US | CT Attenuationa without Contrast | CT Attenuationa with Contrast | Bony Erosion | Relative Signal Intensity on T1b | Relative Signal Intensity on T2b | Enhancement Postgadolinium | ADC (×10−3 mm2/s) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6 | NA | NA | Iso | – | NA | NA | NA | NA |
2 | 5 | NA | NA | Iso | – | NA | NA | NA | NA |
3 | 10 | Hypoechoic | NA | Iso | – | NA | NA | NA | NA |
4 | 43 | NA | Iso | NA | + | Hyper | Hypo | Homogeneous | 0.739 |
5 | 34 | NA | Iso | NA | + | Hyper | Hypo | Homogeneous | NA |
6 | 15 | Hypoechoic | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
7 | 27 | NA | NA | Iso | + | Hyper | Hypo | Homogeneous | 0.534 |
8 | 4 | NA | NA | NA | + | Iso | Hypo | Homogeneous | 0.596 |
9 | 8 | NA | NA | NA | – | Iso | Iso | Homogeneous | NA |
10 | 2–17 | NA | NA | NA | + | Iso | Iso | Homogeneous | 0.777 (largest) |
Note:—Iso indicates isoattenuating; Hyper, hyperintense; Hypo, hypointense; –, absent; +, present; NA, not available.
Compared with muscle.
Compared with gray matter.
Doppler US examinations performed for evaluation of each of the superficial lesions, one adjacent to the coronal suture and the other in the infra-auricular region (Fig 2), revealed sharply defined, ovoid, slightly heterogeneous, hypoechoic masses without demonstrable internal blood flow.
On contrast-enhanced CT, the lesions appeared as homogeneous, solid soft-tissue masses without calcifications and isoattenuating compared with muscle (Fig 2). Bony erosion was present in 3 of 5 children (Figs 3 and 4). CT in 1 patient with a right parietal subperiosteal mass showed an irregular and somewhat aggressive-appearing erosion of the calvarial outer table with a peripheral periosteal reaction (Fig 4). CT in another patient showed mild, smooth, benign-appearing thinning of the frontal bone outer table in the midline above the nasofrontal suture. CT in a third patient showed lytic destruction of the temporal bone affecting the floor of the middle ear space, the tegmen tympani, and the lateral retroauricular mastoid cortex. There was also erosion of the ossicles and otic capsule region of the petrous bone (Fig 3). Bony erosion was not identified in 3 of 6 children. All of these children had small, nonspecific, enhancing soft-tissue masses projecting into the external auditory canal or involving the skin and subcutaneous tissues beneath the ear (Fig 2).
As suggested by the range of technical parameters, the MR imaging technique has evolved considerably during the study period, with a more recent trend toward imaging on 3T systems using multichannel phased array coils with an FOV optimized for the ROI and higher resolution imaging. Nevertheless, on T2-weighted MR images, the JXG ranged from hypointense (3 of 6 patients) to isointense (3 of 6 patients) relative to gray matter (Figs 3–5), while on T1-weighted sequences before administration of contrast, the lesions ranged from isointense (3 of 6 patients) to hyperintense (3 of 6 patients) relative to gray matter (Figs 4 and 5). Diffusion-weighted imaging was available in 4 cases, and the lesions demonstrated decreased diffusivity (Figs 3 and 5), appearing hypointense relative to the cortex on ADC maps, with average ADC values of the lesions ranging from 0.53 to 0.78 × 10−3s/mm2. Enhancement on postcontrast T1-weighted MR imaging was homogeneous in all patients (Figs 3–7).
Two patients had extra-axial lesions associated with edema in the adjacent brain parenchyma with seizures in one of these children (Figs 3 and 6). The other child presented a few weeks after birth with left facial weakness, and imaging revealed temporal bone erosion, as detailed earlier, with progressive enlargement in the soft-tissue components extending inferiorly into the infratemporal fossa and superiorly into the middle cranial fossa on serial imaging (Fig 3). One patient had disseminated disease with innumerable cutaneous and subcutaneous lesions; a calvarial mass; and lobulated, plaquelike dural-based lesions (Fig 7). This patient also had abdominal visceral involvement.
A diagnosis of JXG before head and neck imaging was known in only 1 patient who had cutaneous lesions and disseminated disease. For the remaining 9 patients, the radiologic differential diagnosis provided for the tumor varied depending on the location of the tumor (Table 1). Proposed differential diagnoses included Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) or neuroblastoma (masses with bony erosion), neuroglial heterotopia (midline nasofrontal mass), granulomatous inflammation, lymph node or nonmineralized pilomatrixoma (subcutaneous infra-auricular lesion), epidermoid or dermoid (lesion over a coronal suture and external auditory canal lesion), and first branchial cleft cyst or polyp (external auditory canal lesion). Most interesting, JXG was not included in the initial radiologic differential diagnosis for any of these 9 patients.
Discussion
Our study confirmed that the HN is a favored location for both cutaneous and extracutaneous JXG; the latter included the calvaria, midline nasofrontal region, periauricular region, and temporal bone. Intracranial disease in our series manifested as a dural-based mass or masses. Multifocal disease is rarely encountered. A small but important proportion of all pediatric JXG cases (12%) of this classic pediatric disease undergo preoperative imaging. Our study demonstrated the range of US, CT, and MR imaging findings in primarily extracutaneous JXG of the pediatric HN. We also showed that while only a small fraction of all pediatric JXGs were imaged, this entity was seldom included by the radiologist in the differential diagnosis of HN masses.
Our findings, based on the evaluation of a very limited number of patients, suggest that on US, the presence of a solid, sharply circumscribed, superficial, nonmineralized mass should prompt consideration of JXG in the differential diagnosis. Hypoechoic and relatively avascular sonographic characteristics help distinguish JXG from lymph nodes. Bone erosion associated with JXG was not an uncommon finding in this series and could be depicted on both CT and MR imaging. Indeed, the presence of bone involvement has been described as a feature of JXG, but not of adult xanthogranuloma.17 Tumors that demonstrated punched-out lytic destruction resembled LCH most closely. However, 1 tumor demonstrated irregular calvarial destruction simulating a higher grade primary or metastatic tumor.
On CT, JXGs have been described as masses of soft-tissue attenuation with central areas of hypoattenuation in the muscles, lungs, kidney, liver, and adrenal glands and as small hypoattenuating nodules in the spleen.23 In this series, the cases for which contrast-enhanced CT was performed were homogeneously isoattenuating compared with muscle, without central areas of hypoattenuation. Because the examination protocol did not include precontrast imaging, the true determination of enhancement could not be made with certainty.
The MR imaging appearance of JXGs involving the extremities and CNS has been previously described. Intramuscular JXG may have slightly high signal intensity on T2-weighted images and isointense with muscle on T1-weighted images.24 Likewise, the MR signal intensity of intracranial and spinal JXG has been reported as similar to that of neural tissue with faint homogeneous enhancement after gadolinium administration.25 The higher signal intensity on T1-weighted images compared with the cortex in many of the JXGs in our series is presumably attributable to the presence of lipid within these lesions. Lipid-rich zones correspond to xanthomatized areas that are seen histologically, characterized by abundant intracellular fat within histiocytes, and they occur as a variably prominent component of JXG.2 The low signal intensity compared with the cortex on T2-weighted images may be attributable to attenuated cellularity, which is a common histologic feature, or collagenous matrix, which is thought to develop with time in JXG.26 Decreased diffusivity is also likely attributable to attenuated cellularity and/or collagenous matrix, a feature that simulates higher grade lesions such as neuroblastomas or atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors. Ultimately, imaging is useful for delineating the extent of disease and for narrowing the differential diagnosis.17
Our review of radiology reports for differential diagnoses provided at the time of imaging highlighted some of the diagnostic pitfalls that can be posed by JXG. The size and location of the JXG affected the radiographic differential diagnosis. For example, the small, nonerosive lesions projecting into the external auditory meatus simulated polyps or dermoids. The cutaneous and subcutaneous infra-auricular lesion was mistaken for a benign tumor of hair follicles or possibly a granulomatous infection. Two cases of midline nasal region JXGs mimicked neuroglial heterotopia, encephalocele, or dermoid/epidermoid on physical examination. One of these lesions was thought to be a neuroglial heterotopia at the time of imaging by virtue of the midline nasofrontal location and similar signal characteristics compared with the cortex. In retrospect, a clue as to the correct diagnosis lay in the relative high signal on T1-weighted imaging before contrast, the relatively low signal intensity on T2, and homogeneous enhancement following the administration of contrast. Three lesions (midline frontal, parietal, and infratemporal fossa eroding temporal bone) that demonstrated bony erosion were originally interpreted at the time of imaging as LCH, metastasis (eg, neuroblastoma), fibrous tumor, or other malignant tumor. Reinterpretation of the imaging for this study revealed intrinsic T1 shortening in 2 of 3 of these lesions that again would have been atypical for entities mentioned in the differential diagnosis. Thus, imaging provides information for surgical planning and can be useful in differentiating JXG from other lesions in the clinical differential diagnosis or at least should prompt inclusion of JXG in the differential diagnosis.
Histologic misclassification can be a pitfall in studies requiring histologic-radiologic correlation. In the current study, we believe the histologic diagnoses to have been ascertained with a high level of certainty. When classic histologic features including Touton giant cells are observed, the microscopic findings in JXG are quite distinctive. When Touton giant cells are lacking, the histologic differential may sometimes expand to include other lesions that can show histiocytic differentiation, as can be observed in a subset of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors and fibrous histiocytomas; however, immunohistologic and sometimes genetic information can be discriminating in these more difficult cases.
Intracranial involvement in JXG is uncommon and, in our limited experience, includes solitary or multiple dural-based lesions and secondary extension from extracranial sites, as demonstrated in the present series. In some cases, there may be parenchymal edema adjacent to the lesions, which can be associated with seizure activity. Multiple intraparenchymal and subarachnoid foci of JXG are rare but are also described in the literature.8 Intracranial involvement in JXG is associated with increased mortality and morbidity.8 The intracranial lesions tend to grow and require follow-up imaging.11 While cutaneous lesions usually resolve spontaneously, extracutaneous lesions may require medical or surgical intervention.8 Optimal treatment for unresectable, systemic disease is currently undefined; however, treatment regimens similar to those used for LCH have been used successfully.27–29
Conclusions
JXG of the HN has a variety of manifestations and can simulate LCH, fibrous tumors, and high-grade, highly cellular lesions such as neuroblastoma or other malignant neoplasms. The presence of a soft-tissue mass with intrinsically high signal intensity on T1-weighted images and relatively low signal intensity on T2-weighted MR images relative to the cerebral cortex, homogeneous enhancement, and decreased diffusivity may suggest the diagnosis of JXG. Familiarity with the common locations, typical imaging appearances, and recognized diagnostic pitfalls outlined herein may prompt radiologists to include JXG in the radiographic differential diagnosis for head and neck masses.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- HN
head and neck
- JXG
juvenile xanthogranuloma
- LCH
Langerhans cell histiocytosis
- US
ultrasound
Footnotes
Disclosures: Sara O. Vargas—UNRELATED: Expert Testimony: Previous testimony as an expert witness for medical malpractice cases. Medical issues involved were unrelated to the topic of the current work.
Previously presented as a poster at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Head and Neck Radiology, September 25–29, 2013; Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
References
- 1. Jaffe R, Fletcher CD, Burgdorf WH. Disseminated juvenile xanthogranuloma. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, et al., eds. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues. 4th ed. Lyon: IARC; 2008:366–67 [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dehner LP. Juvenile xanthogranulomas in the first two decades of life: a clinicopathologic study of 174 cases with cutaneous and extracutaneous manifestations. Am J Surg Pathol 2003;27:579–93 10.1097/00000478-200305000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Konar S, Pandey P, Yasha TC. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in cervical spine: case report and review of the literature. Turk Neurosurg 2014;24:102–07 10.5137/1019-5149.JTN.7712-13.0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Baik FM, Andeen NK, Schmechel SC, et al. A large juvenile xanthogranuloma within the tongue. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2014;150:332–33 10.1177/0194599813514534 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Puerta P, Candela S, Rovira C, et al. Juvenile xanthogranuloma of skull base: case report and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2013;155:1039–40 10.1007/s00701-013-1718-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Chiba K, Aihara Y, Eguchi S, et al. Diagnostic and management difficulties in a case of multiple intracranial juvenile xanthogranuloma. Childs Nerv Syst 2013;29:1039–45 10.1007/s00381-013-2100-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Chu MW, Werner A, Moody-Antonio SA. Juvenile xanthogranuloma of the tympanic membrane: a case report. Ear Nose Throat J 2012;91:364, 366,, 368 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lalitha P, Reddy MCh, Reddy KJ. Extensive intracranial juvenile xanthogranulomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:E132–33 10.3174/ajnr.A2209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Johnson TE, Alabiad C, Wei L, et al. Extensive juvenile xanthogranuloma involving the orbit, sinuses, brain, and subtemporal fossa in a newborn. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 26:133–34 10.1097/IOP.0b013e3181b8f2b6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Sun LP, Jin HM, Yang B, et al. Intracranial solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in an infant. World J Pediatr 2009;5:71–73 10.1007/s12519-009-0015-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kasliwal MK, Suri A, Rishi A, et al. Symptomatic bilateral cerebellar mass lesions: an unusual presentation of intracranial xanthogranuloma. J Clin Neurosci 2008;15:1401–04 10.1016/j.jocn.2007.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Cao D, Ma J, Yang X, et al. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma in the upper cervical spine: case report and review of the literatures. Eur Spine J 2008;17(suppl 2):S318–23 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Margulis A, Melin-Aldana H, Bauer BS. Juvenile xanthogranuloma invading the muscles in the head and neck: clinicopathological case report. Ann Plast Surg 2003;50:425–28 10.1097/01.SAP.0000029628.20606.05 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Behne K, Casey T. Ulcerated juvenile xanthogranuloma of the scalp. Australas J Dermatol 2003;44:74–75 10.1046/j.1440-0960.2003.00643.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Thevasagayam MS, Ghosh S, O'Neill D, et al. Isolated juvenile xanthogranuloma of the subglottis: case report. Head Neck 2001;23:426–29 10.1002/hed.1053 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Saravanappa N, Rashid AM, Thebe PR, et al. Juvenile xanthogranuloma of the nasal cavity. J Laryngol Otol 2000;114:460–61 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Miszkiel KA, Sohaib SA, Rose GE, et al. Radiological and clinicopathological features of orbital xanthogranuloma. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:251–58 10.1136/bjo.84.3.251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shapiro NL, Malis DJ, Charon CC, et al. Giant juvenile xanthogranuloma of the tongue. Am J Otolaryngol 1999;20:241–44 10.1016/S0196-0709(99)90007-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Hidayat AA, Mafee MF, Laver NV, et al. Langerhans' cell histiocytosis and juvenile xanthogranuloma of the orbit: clinicopathologic, CT, and MR imaging features. Radiol Clin North Am 1998;36:1229–40, xii [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Tamir I, Davir R, Fellig Y, et al. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma mimicking intracranial tumor in children. J Clin Neurosci 2013;20:183–88 10.1016/j.jocn.2012.05.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Deisch JK, Patel R, Koral K, et al. Juvenile xanthogranulomas of the nervous system: a report of two cases and review of the literature. Neuropathology 2013;33:39–46 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2012.01323.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cornips EM, Cox KE, Creytens DH, et al. Solitary juvenile xanthogranuloma of the temporal muscle and bone penetrating the dura mater in a 2-month-old boy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2009;4:588–91 10.3171/2009.7.PEDS09230 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Yeh BM, Nobrega KT, Reddy GP, et al. Juvenile xanthogranuloma of the heart and liver: MRI, sonographic, and CT appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:W202–04 10.2214/AJR.05.1398 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. David JK, Anupindi SA, Deshpande V, et al. Intramuscular juvenile xanthogranuloma: sonographic and MR findings. Pediatr Radiol 2003;33:203–06 10.1007/s00247-002-0813-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Rampini PM, Alimehmeti RH, Egidi MG, et al. Isolated cervical juvenile xanthogranuloma in childhood. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2001;26:1392–95 10.1097/00007632-200106150-00026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Patterson JW, Wick MR. Nonmelanocytic Tumors of the Skin: AFIP Atlas of Tumor Pathology. Washington: American Registry of Pathology; 2006:389–413 [Google Scholar]
- 27. Auvin S, Cuvellier JC, Vinchon M, et al. Subdural effusion in a CNS involvement of systemic juvenile xanthogranuloma: a case report treated with vinblastin. Brain Dev 2008;30:164–68 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Nakatani T, Morimoto A, Kato R, et al. Successful treatment of congenital systemic juvenile xanthogranuloma with Langerhans cell histiocytosis-based chemotherapy. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol 2004;26:371–74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Simko SJ, Tran HD, Jones J, et al. Clofarabine salvage therapy in refractory multifocal histiocytic disorders, including Langerhans cell histiocytosis, juvenile xanthogranuloma and Rosai-Dorfman disease. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2014;61:479–87 10.1002/pbc.24772 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]