Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Arthrogryposis is among the malformations of congenital Zika syndrome. Similar to the brain, there might exist a spectrum of spinal cord abnormalities. The purpose of this study was to explore and describe in detail the MR imaging features found in the spinal cords, nerve roots, and brains of children with congenital Zika syndrome with and without arthrogryposis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Twelve infants with congenital Zika syndrome (4 with arthrogryposis and 8 without) who had undergone brain and spinal cord MR imaging were retrospectively selected. Qualitative and quantitative analyses were performed and compared between groups.
RESULTS:
At visual inspection, both groups showed reduced thoracic spinal cord thickness: 75% (6/8) of the group without arthrogryposis and 100% (4/4) of the arthrogryposis group. However, the latter had the entire spinal cord reduced and more severely reduced conus medullaris anterior roots (respectively, P = .002 and .007). Quantitative differences were found for conus medullaris base and cervical and lumbar intumescences diameters (respectively, P = .008, .048, .008), with more prominent reduction in arthrogryposis. Periventricular calcifications were more frequent in infants with arthrogryposis (P = .018).
CONCLUSIONS:
Most infants had some degree of spinal cord thickness reduction, predominant in the thoracic segment (without arthrogryposis) or in the entire spinal cord (with arthrogryposis). The conus medullaris anterior roots were reduced in both groups (thinner in arthrogryposis). A prominent anterior median fissure of the spinal cord was absent in infants without arthrogryposis. Brain stem hypoplasia was present in all infants with arthrogryposis, periventricular calcifications, in the majority, and polymicrogyria was absent.
The Zika virus infection is transmitted by a bite from an infected mosquito, with Aedes aegypti being the main vector.1 Zika virus was first discovered in 1947 in monkeys in the Zika forest in Uganda,2 and human infection was identified in 1952.3 The first epidemic of Zika virus occurred only in 2007 in Micronesia and the Yap Islands.4 The second epidemic was found in 2013, in French Polynesia,5 and the third began in Brazil,6,7 where it was initially detected in Bahia, Northeast Brazil, in March 2015.6,8
In September 2015, a substantial increase in the incidence of infants with microcephaly was detected in northeast Brazil.8 For the first time, a strong increase of evidence suggested the association between the Zika virus infection outbreak and microcephaly by congenital infection.9 In Brazil, on December 31, 2016, there were 2366 cases of microcephaly and other central nervous system malformations suggestive of congenital Zika syndrome.10 There are 2 major lineages of Zika virus, the African, reported recently in Guinea-Bissau, and the Asian, reported from Asia and the West Pacific region to the Americas and Cabo Verde, which is the strain currently in Brazil.10 Neurologic complications have been related only to the Asian strains after 2007.10 The explanation as to why and how the Brazilian Zika virus strain could have developed this neurotropism for the central nervous system is still unknown.
The disease has already spread and, according to the World Health Organization, 76 countries and territories, particularly in Latin America, have reported evidence of transmission of the Zika virus by mosquitoes. Cases of microcephalic infants have been reported in 29 countries.10
In addition to microcephaly, other serious brain abnormalities were observed, especially brain calcifications, predominantly in the cortical and subcortical white matter junction, associated with malformations of cortical development (often polymicrogyria or pachygyria with predominant frontal lobe involvement) and a simplified cortical gyral pattern. Other frequent imaging findings are ventriculomegaly; decrease in brain, brain stem, and cerebellar volumes; enlargement of the cisterna magna and the extra-axial subarachnoid space; corpus callosum abnormalities (hypogenesis and hypoplasia); and delayed myelination.11
The congenital Zika syndrome is an entity without a well-known clinical spectrum, probably with only the most severe cases of the spectrum recognized. Other malformations have been described in some infants, such as ophthalmologic alterations12,13 and arthrogryposis.11,13,14 Currently, 8% of the children with presumed congenital Zika virus infection followed by the Association for Assistance of Disabled Children (AACD) in Recife, Brazil have arthrogryposis. Among the children with CSF immunoglobulin M (IgM) who tested positive for Zika virus, 6.6% have arthrogryposis.
Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita, often known simply as arthrogryposis, is a syndrome characterized by joint contractures, present since birth, affecting ≥2 areas of the body.15–20 These joint malformations can be attributed to different disorders, such as defects of uterine environment, disorders of connective tissues, muscular dystrophies, and other abnormalities or conditions that affect the central or peripheral nervous systems in at least one of the components of the motor pathways from the spinal cord to muscles.16,18 Regardless of the cause, children affected by arthrogryposis have onset and severe weakness early in intrauterine life, with immobilization of joints at different developmental stages.16
No study has yet analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively MR imaging of the spinal cord of children with congenital Zika syndrome, to our knowledge. Because there is a spectrum of congenital Zika syndrome for brain abnormalities, a similar spectrum might occur in the spinal cord. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore and describe in detail the MR imaging features found in the spinal cord and nerve roots of infants with congenital Zika syndrome with or without arthrogryposis.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective series included 12 infants diagnosed with congenital Zika syndrome, based on the Brazilian government protocol,8 who had or did not have arthrogryposis and met the following inclusion criteria: 1) brain imaging suggestive of any congenital infection; 2) a complete investigation with negative findings, including laboratory testing, of the other 6 main infectious causes of primary microcephaly (toxoplasmosis, cytomegalovirus, rubella, syphilis, herpes simplex, and HIV); 3) negative results of an investigation, through clinical examination and family history, for causes of microcephaly and brain calcifications such as prenatal and perinatal complications; exposure to licit and illicit drugs, toxic substances, and ionizing radiation; genetic and metabolic diseases; and congenital infections; and 4) the existence of previously performed brain and spinal cord MR imaging.
Since October 2015, infants with suspected microcephaly born in Pernambuco are reported on a government Web site (cievspe.com/microcefalia) by health professionals. The criterion for microcephaly up to December 2015 was a head circumference of ≤33 cm. Therefore, all the infants born before December 2015, including all the ones included in this study, were referred for investigation of congenital Zika syndrome because they had a head circumference of up to 33 cm (currently, the criterion for microcephaly is based on the International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century [INTERGROWTH-21st]). Once microcephaly was detected, the infants in this study were referred to the AACD, where they were evaluated, as needed, by a multidisciplinary team. The AACD has become one of the major referral centers in Pernambuco for the diagnosis and follow-up of children with microcephaly and congenital Zika syndrome.
Besides a noncontrast brain CT scan, obtained in all suspected cases of microcephaly as part of the government protocol, all infants in this study also underwent MR imaging, based on clinical evaluation. The major indications for brain MR imaging were the presence of refractory seizures or suspicion of hydrocephalus, while the major indications for spinal cord MR imaging were suspicions of arthrogryposis or the presence of early-onset abnormal posture of the limbs. A reduced essential protocol for neuroaxis MR imaging was created in our service with a reduced sedation time.
This retrospective study was approved by the Federal University of Pernambuco Research Ethical Committee, and the children's mothers or guardians gave their consent for the publication of the results and images. Infants included in this study were chosen by convenience, following the inclusion criteria. Up to the beginning of the study, 12 infants with congenital Zika syndrome (4 with arthrogryposis and 8 without it) had undergone, postnatally, brain and spinal cord MR imaging at our service.
Inclusion of controls was not possible because the techniques and section thickness of spinal MR imaging of infants up to 1 year found retrospectively at our service (5 cases) were different from the 12 already-included cases, making comparison very difficult. Nevertheless, a brief qualitative comparison, by visual inspection, was still performed (Fig 1).
MR imaging of the whole spinal cord was performed in all 12 children. All the images were T2-weighted. The protocol was optimized to decrease the examination time. Therefore, T1 was not performed in the spinal cord, and the duration of an MR imaging procedure for the brain and spinal cord was 50 minutes, approximately. Of the 12 children, 2 underwent MR imaging in a 1.5T scanner (Intera; Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands); and 10, in a 1.5T scanner (Signa HDxt; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin). The 2 examinations performed in the Philips MR imaging scanner had technical parameters similar to those of the GE scanner, while measurements were performed on balanced fast-field echo sequences. No contrast was used in any of the infants, while sedation was necessary for all of them. Table 1 shows the parameters used for brain and spinal cord MR imaging. The images were analyzed and measured by 2 experienced neuroradiologists (M.F.V.V.A. and A.M.B.-L.), with the final interpretation determined by a consensus between them. Discrepancies between observers were not common, and when they occurred, they were resolved jointly after further review of the images.
Table 1:
MRI Parameters | Brain |
Spinal Cord |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Axial 3D SWAN | Axial 3D FSPGR | Axial T2*GRE | Sagittal 3D Volumetric GRE | Coronal T2 | Axial T2 | |
TE (ms) | 50 | Minimum | 645 | Minimum | 120 | 110 |
TR (ms) | 78.3 | – | 25 | – | 3700 | 5934 |
Flip angle | 15° | 12° | 15° | 45° | – | – |
Bandwidth (kHz) | 41.67 | 31.25 | 31.25 | 50 | 41 | 31.25 |
FOV (cm) | 20 | 20 | 24 | 30 | 25 | 18 |
Section thickness (mm) | 3 | 2 | 5 | 0.8 | 4.5 | 4 |
Spacing (mm) | – | – | 0.5 | – | 0.5 | 1 |
Frequency (Hz) | 288 | 256 | 288 | 320 | 384 | 320 |
Phase | 224 | 256 | 192 | 320 | 224 | 224 |
NEX | – | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Frequency direction | AP | AP | AP | AP | R-L | AP |
Note:—AP indicates anteroposterior; R-L, right-left; FSPGR, fast-spoiled gradient recalled; SWAN, susceptibility-weighted angiography.
Measurements of the spinal cord and spinal canal of these infants were taken by using the PACS software. To account for the spinal cord and spine curvatures, we performed all the measurements on sagittal images, as shown in Fig 2 (sagittal T2 volumetric gradient recalled-echo [GRE] image and balanced fast-field echo, respectively, in the GE Healthcare and Philips scanners).
The anatomic references for measurements of the spinal cord were the following: the smallest anteroposterior diameter of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar segments; and the largest anteroposterior diameter of the cervical and lumbar segments (ie, cervical and lumbar intumescences in adults are from about C4 to T1 and from T9 to T12, respectively)21 determined by visual inspection. The anteroposterior diameter of the conus medullaris base was also measured. It is defined as the inferior portion of the spinal cord, at the location where the spinal cord begin to reduce its thickness to form the conus medullaris. The medullaris cone is usually located, in infants, in the level of L2–L3 or above.22 Similarly, the vertebral canal was measured at approximately the same levels as the spinal cord measurements, to obtain a spinal cord/vertebral canal ratio for each measure of the spinal cord. These measurements were compared between children with and without arthrogryposis.
Other features of the spinal cord were qualitatively evaluated and compared between the 2 groups on axial T2 FSE or volumetric GRE and balanced fast-field echo reconstructions. The features evaluated in the axial plane were reduction of conus medullaris roots (graded as mild, moderate, and severe) and prominence of the anterior median fissure of the spinal cord (absent or present). On the sagittal plane, the thickness for each spinal cord segment (normal or decreased) was evaluated. The hip joints were assessed for developmental dysplasia on coronal FSE T2WI.
Additionally, brain MR imaging findings were compared between the 2 groups. We reviewed the MR images for the following: decreased brain volume (graded as mild, moderate, and severe); cerebral ventricular enlargement due to white matter hypoplasia; malformations of cortical development and sulcation and their locations; abnormalities of the corpus callosum (classified as agenesis, hypogenesis, and hypoplasia); myelination (normal or delayed, based on a previous study); the presence and location of brain calcifications; decreased brain stem and cerebellar volume; an enlarged cisterna magna; an enlarged anterior supratentorial subarachnoid space; and the presence of intraparenchymal cysts.
Symmetry of brain damage was also evaluated. It was determined by visual comparison between the cerebral hemispheres. The criteria used to describe pathologic asymmetry were those used in clinical practice, mainly ventricle size, sulci enlargement, cerebral lobe size, and spatial displacement of the left and right hemispheres with respect to each other. When the differences between the hemispheres were according to the normal pattern, even though they were not equally sized, the damage was considered symmetric.
Statistical Analysis
Absolute and percentage values were calculated to describe the qualitative variables and median and interquartile ranges for continuous variables. For association, we used the Fisher exact test. The Mann-Whitney test was applied to compare continuous variables. A P value < .05 was significant, while a P value < .1 was considered a statistical trend. The authors opted to include the data with a statistical trend because it points to the possibility of finding statistically significant results if the sample size is increased. The statistical analyses were performed with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences software, Version 21.0 (IBM, Armonk, New York).
Results
Of the analyzed sample of 12 children, 7 (58%) were boys, and of the total, 4 (33%) had arthrogryposis. Maternal mean age was 27.4 ± 8.5 years. Gestational age ranged from 35 to 40 weeks, with an average of 38.2 ± 1.6 weeks. Nine of the mothers reported a rash, 6 (66.7%) in the first trimester and 3 (33.3%) in the second trimester. Forty percent of girls in this study had arthrogryposis, while 29% of boys had arthrogryposis, with no statistical difference (P = 1.000). Table 2 shows the individual clinical data of the 12 children and the IgM CSF status positive for Zika virus for all 8 children tested. The mean age at MR imaging was 135.83 days (131.25 days for the arthrogryposis group and 138.16 days for the group without arthrogryposis). The On-line Table shows the individual radiologic data of the 12 children.
Table 2:
No. | Sex | Gestational Age (wk) | HC at Birth (cm) | Mother's Rash during Pregnancy | Joints Affected | IgM ZIKV CSF Statusa |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Congenital Zika syndrome without arthrogryposis | ||||||
1 | F | 35 | 29.5 | 2 mo | Positive | |
2 | M | 36 | 31.5 | 4 mo | No data | |
3 | F | 40 | 30 | No rash | No data | |
4 | M | 39 | 26 | 3 mo | Positive | |
5 | M | 39 | 31 | 3 mo | Positive | |
6 | F | 39 | 28.5 | 2.5 mo | Positive | |
7 | M | 39 wk 5 days | 32 | 4 mo | Positive | |
8 | M | 39 wk 5 days | 28 | 3 mo | Positive | |
Congenital Zika syndrome with arthrogryposis | ||||||
9 | F | 37 | 29 | No rash | Feet, knees, hips, elbows, wrists, fingers | Positive |
10 | M | 37 | 26 | 4 mo | Feet, knees, hips, wrists, fingers | No data |
11 | M | 40 | 27 | No rash | Feet, knees, hips | No data |
12 | F | 38 | 30 | 2 mo | Feet, hips, wrists, fingers | Positive |
Note:—HC indicates head circumference; ZIKV, Zika virus.
Test performed on the infant.
At visual inspection, both groups showed reduction of high thoracic spinal cord thickness: 75% (6/8) without arthrogryposis and 100% (4/4) with arthrogryposis. The thoracic spinal cord segment was frequently the one most severely reduced, as shown in Table 3. Indeed, all children with arthrogryposis had more segments of the spinal cord affected and had severe reduction of the anterior nerve roots of the conus medullaris compared with the children without arthrogryposis, with statistical significance (respectively, P = .002 and .007). However, 6 of the children without arthrogryposis also had reductions of the anterior conus medullaris roots (4 had mild and 2 had moderate reduction), and 6 had congenital hip dysplasia. The groups were also found to be different, with a statistical trend (P =.091), regarding the prominence of the anterior median fissure of the spinal cord, with none of the children without arthrogryposis having this feature.
Table 3:
Ag (n = 4) | No Ag (n = 8) | Pb | |
---|---|---|---|
Sites with spinal cord reduction | |||
Absent | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | .002c |
Thoracic | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (62.5%) | |
Cervical, thoracic | 0 (0.0%) | 1 (12.5%) | |
Cervical, thoracic, conus medullaris | 4 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Site of most severe spinal cord reduction | |||
Absent | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | <.999 |
Thoracic | 4 (100.0%) | 6 (75.0%) | |
Prominence of the anterior median fissure of the spinal cord | |||
Absent | 2 (50.0%) | 8 (100.0%) | .091 |
Present | 2 (50.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Reduction of the anterior nerve roots of the conus medullaris | |||
No reduction | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | .007c |
Mild | 0 (0.0%) | 4 (50.0%) | |
Moderate | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | |
Severe | 4 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Congenital hip dysplasia | |||
Absent | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (25.0%) | .515 |
Present | 4 (100.0%) | 6 (75.0%) |
Note:—Ag indicates arthrogryposis.
Data are number of patients (%).
P = Fisher Exact test.
Statistically significant.
Thus, in summary, the 4 infants with congenital Zika syndrome and arthrogryposis had, at visual inspection, reduced thickness of all segments of the spinal cord, with the thoracic segment its most compromised portion. All of them also had a severe reduction of the anterior nerve roots of the conus medullaris and congenital hip dysplasia. In addition, half of these infants had a prominent anterior median fissure, a feature not identified in any of the children without arthrogryposis.
Overall, the anteroposterior diameters of different levels of the spinal cord were smaller in infants with arthrogryposis compared with those without (Table 4). Statistically significant differences were found between the children with and without arthrogryposis regarding the conus medullaris base and lumbar and cervical intumescence measurements (respectively, P= .008, .008, .048). In addition, a statistical trend was observed regarding the smallest cervical spinal cord diameter (P = .073). No statistical difference was found in the smallest high thoracic spinal cord anteroposterior diameters between the 2 groups.
Table 4:
AP Diameters (mm) | Spinal Cord Measures |
Spinal Cord/Vertebral Canal Ratio |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ag (n = 4) | No Ag (n = 8) | Pb | Ag (n = 4) | No Ag (n = 8) | Pb | |
Smallest spinal cord diameters | ||||||
Cervical | 4.5 (4.4–4.9) | 5.4 (4.7–5.9) | .073 | 0.44 (0.41–0.47) | 0.57 (0.44–0.60) | .154 |
High thoracic | 3.6 (2.8–4.2) | 3.9 (3.6–4.5) | .214 | 0.39 (0.29–0.41) | 0.39 (0.34–0.46) | .570 |
Conus medullaris base | 4.3 (3.5–4.8) | 6.3 (5.7–6.5) | .008c | 0.44 (0.41–0.47) | 0.57 (0.44–0.60) | .016c |
Largest spinal cord diameters | ||||||
Cervical intumescence | 4.7 (4.5–5.0) | 5.6 (5.4–6.2) | .048c | 0.46 (0.41–0.49) | 0.58 (0.47–0.63) | .109 |
Lumbar intumescence | 5.0 (3.9–5.8) | 7.3 (7.1–7.5) | .008c | 0.44 (0.32–0.51) | 0.59 (0.56–0.64) | .008c |
Note:—AP indicates anteroposterior; Ag, arthrogryposis.
Data are median (25th–75th percentile).
P = Mann-Whitney test.
Statistically significant.
The anteroposterior diameter of the vertebral canal was statistically similar between the 2 groups. The ratio between the spinal cord diameters and these vertebral canal measurements, at similar levels of the spinal cord, revealed statistically significant differences in the conus medullaris base and the lumbar intumescence between children with and without arthrogryposis (respectively, P = .016 and .008) (Table 4).
Figures 3 and 4 show children with congenital Zika syndrome with arthrogryposis, while Fig 5 shows a child with congenital Zika syndrome without arthrogryposis. Reduced spinal cord thickness (Figs 3D and 4C), severe reduction of anterior conus medullaris roots (Figs 3E–G and 4G, -H), and congenital hip dysplasia (Fig 3I) were found in all children with arthrogryposis.
Statistically significant differences between the groups with and without arthrogryposis were found only in periventricular calcifications (P = 0.018) when brain abnormalities were compared, and only a statistical trend was observed for cerebellar or brain stem hypoplasia, cerebellar calcifications, and brain stem calcifications (Table 5); those findings were more frequent in infants with arthrogryposis than without it, being brain stem hypoplasia found in all 4 infants, and cerebellar hypoplasia in 2 of them. The cerebral damage was severe in all the children with arthrogryposis, while only 3 without arthrogryposis had severe damage, though there were no statistical differences between the groups.
Table 5:
Variables | Arthrogryposis |
Pb | |
---|---|---|---|
No (n = 8) | Yes (n = 4) | ||
Decreased brain volume | 6 (75.0%) | 4 (100.0%) | .515 |
Grade of brain volume decrease | |||
Mild | 1 (20.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | .876 |
Moderate/severe | 4 (80.0%) | 3 (100.0%) | |
Degree of cerebral damage | .394 | ||
Absent | 1 (12.5%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Mild | 2 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Moderate | 2 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Severe | 3 (37.5%) | 4 (100.0%) | |
Symmetry | 6 (75.0%) | 3 (75.0%) | >.999 |
Cortical development abnormalities | |||
Pachygyria | 3 (37.5%) | 3 (75.0%) | .545 |
Polymicrogyria | 2 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | .515 |
Simplified gyral pattern | 4 (50.0%) | 3 (75.0%) | .576 |
Corpus callosum | >.999 | ||
Normal | 2 (25.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | |
Hypogenesis | 5 (62.5%) | 3 (75.0%) | |
Hypoplasia | 1 (12.5%) | 1 (25.0%) | |
Cortical and subcortical junction calcifications | 7 (85.5%) | 4 (100.0%) | >.999 |
Basal ganglia calcifications | 3 (37.5%) | 3 (75.0%) | .545 |
Periventricular calcifications | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (75.0%) | .018c |
Brain stem calcifications | 1 (12.5%) | 3 (75.0%) | .067 |
Cerebellum calcifications | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (50.0%) | .091 |
Cerebellum or brain stem hypoplasia | 2 (25.0%) | 4 (100.0%) | .061 |
Increased cisterna magna | 8 (100.0%) | 4 (100.0%) | – |
Delayed myelination | 5 (50.0%) | 4 (100.0%) | .208 |
Data are number of patients (%).
P = Fisher Exact test.
Regarding malformations of cortical development, no statistical differences were found. None of the infants with arthrogryposis had polymicrogyria, while this malformation was present in 2 children without arthrogryposis (P =.515). Pachygyria and a simplified gyral pattern were more often seen among the infants with arthrogryposis (both P = .576): One had diffuse pachygyria, one had diffuse simplified gyral pattern, and the other 2 had both malformations, with frontal pachygyria and a simplified parieto-occipital gyral pattern.
Discussion
We analyzed the spinal cords of children with microcephaly with congenital Zika syndrome with and without arthrogryposis. One-third of our sample had arthrogryposis, a figure that is not representative of the entire sample of patients with congenital Zika syndrome in the AACD.
By visual inspection, the arthrogryposis group had significant qualitative reduction of the entire spinal cord and severe reduction in the anterior conus medullaris roots. However, most of the children without arthrogryposis also had mild reduction of the anterior conus medullaris roots, and often just the thoracic spinal cord was reduced. This finding could explain the lack of statistical differences in the thoracic spinal cord segment between the groups evaluated in quantitative analysis.
Significant quantitative differences were found between the groups, with arthrogryposis showing a thinner conus medullaris base, lumbar intumescence, and cervical intumescence. The arthrogryposis group was also significantly thinner at the conus medullaris base and at the lumbar intumescence by the evaluation of ratios with the canal diameter (anteroposterior diameters of the spinal cord/vertebral canal).
These findings support the hypothesis that the congenital Zika syndrome has a disease-severity spectrum. The spectrum is not restricted to the brain, but a disease spectrum is also present in the spinal cord and spinal roots. Clinically, this spectrum would range from absent or mild manifestations to arthrogryposis. Thus, arthrogryposis would be the most severe extreme of the spectrum of spinal cord damage, with thinner thickness of the entire spinal cord and severe anterior nerve root reduction. However, the MRIs of infants without arthrogryposis have also demonstrated some grade of damage in the spinal cord, mainly in the thoracic segment, with some mild anterior spinal root reduction.
Our study has no control group for quantitative analysis. In addition, we have found no references in the literature to normal spinal cord measurements in infants. The control group is a group difficult to obtain retrospectively, especially with the same MR imaging technique for accurate comparison.
Arthrogryposis has been associated with microcephaly in the spectrum of congenital Zika virus infection.11,13,14 Schuler-Faccini et al14 identified arthrogryposis in 4 of 27 children, while Oliveira Melo et al13 mentioned 1 child with the condition. In addition, Melo et al23 also described 3 neonates who died shortly after birth. The MR imaging findings in arthrogryposis were recently reported, but that series of cases did not evaluate the spinal cord of infants without arthrogryposis.24 This study identified apparently reduced spinal cord thickness and reduced ventral roots in comparison with the dorsal roots.24 Regarding neurogenic arthrogryposis in patients without congenital Zika virus infection, Fedrizzi et al17 described brain and spinal cord MR imaging findings in 10 patients without an identified etiology.
The histopathologic changes in neurogenic arthrogryposis are dysgenesis of the anterior medullary horns and cytoarchitectural disorganization, which are more prominent in cervical and lumbosacral intumescences associated with motor function.16 Histopathologic evaluation of the spinal cord of an infant with congenital Zika syndrome and arthrogryposis revealed fewer motor neurons than expected, even though transverse spinal cord sections could not be obtained.23 In addition, the brain stem had nerve cell degeneration and coarse and filamentous calcifications, while the cerebellum was hypoplastic and had focal cortical dysplasia.23
The above-mentioned features were previously suggested by brain and spinal MR imaging evaluation of infants with arthrogryposis and reported by the authors24 and are consistent with what was found in the present study, reinforcing MR imaging being able to demonstrate the physiopathology of the congenital Zika syndrome. In this context, Zika virus probably has a tropism for the brain and also for the motor spinal cord neurons, which could occur initially in the thoracic region and achieve cervical and lumbar intumescences and conus medullaris in more severe cases.
Tropism of the Zika virus for neurons, leading eventually to their death, has been shown in the literature.23 The morphologic brain alterations with multiple calcifications, mainly in the junction between the cortical and subcortical white matter, induced by the Zika virus, suggest serious damage that may cause sudden arrest in the development of the nervous system, resulting in a simplified pattern of cortical circumvolutions, malformations of cortical development (mainly in the frontal lobes), associated with ventriculomegaly, and corpus callosum and brain stem hypoplasia.11,13,25,26 Long tract and spinal cord neuron alterations may occur in congenital Zika virus infection, even in patients without arthrogryposis. This hypothesis is supported by Mlakar et al,26 who described infant brain abnormalities and Wallerian degeneration in the descending tracts of the brain stem and spinal cord, while the ascending tracts of the dorsal columns were well-preserved, in a 32-week-old fetus with confirmed real-time polymerase chain reaction for Zika virus infection without arthrogryposis.
In our study, the arthrogryposis group showed significantly more frequent periventricular calcifications and a trend toward more frequent cerebellar and brain stem hypoplasia and calcifications. One hypothesis that could be taken from these data is that the Zika virus damage to the human neural progenitor cells27 in the periventricular zone will be more pronounced in children with arthrogryposis. Another possible explanation is major damage in the basal ganglia and pyramidal tracts, which could lead to or be associated with brain stem and cerebellar hypoplasia and spinal cord abnormalities. We hypothesized that both primary and secondary damage to the spinal cord are possible. We observed that the virus probably has great tropism for motor neurons, both in the brain (frontal lobes) and spinal cord (ventral spinal cord). In this context, MR imaging is important in understanding the physiopathology of congenital Zika syndrome and clarifying that the joint malformations found in these children are due to the virus tropism for specific motor neurons in related areas of the brain stem, cerebellum, and spinal cord and not to direct action of the virus in the osteoarticular system.
Although without significance, the overall brain damage caused by the Zika virus was more pronounced in the arthrogryposis group. Another interesting observation is that polymicrogyria was absent in the 4 children with arthrogryposis, while pachygyria was present in almost all the infants with arthrogryposis. Polymicrogyria is a feature related to an interruption in the late stages of neuronal migration and cortical organization that originates only after the twentieth gestational week,28 while pachygyria is believed to originate in the early phase of pregnancy, between the twelfth and sixteenth gestational weeks.28 These data can indicate that congenital Zika syndrome with arthrogryposis is more often associated with earlier fetal infection, further supported by the more severe damage found in these infants. However, we did not find an association of the type of malformation of cortical development with the time of the mother's rash.
Nevertheless, the literature has shown that there is an interval between the maternal infection and the sonographic evidence of fetal abnormalities from 2 to 27 weeks.23 We suppose that the month of the mother's rash does not necessarily indicate exactly when the embryo or fetus was infected, whether early or late during infection of the mother in the pregnancy.
On the basis of the findings described in this study, it is important to consider Zika virus infection in the differential diagnosis of congenital spinal cord and anterior nerve root diseases if the infant and mother have a positive epidemiologic context. This is especially important in mild cases in which microcephaly is absent and the only clinical manifestation is, for example, abnormal joints. On the other hand, health professionals should pay close attention during the follow-up of children from an epidemic area with mild or no clinical signs of spinal cord and anterior nerve root damage because they could possibly have future problems in their neuropsychomotor development. This can also be true for children without microcephaly, born in regions with the Zika virus epidemic.
It is difficult to determine the prognosis of the different degrees of the congenital Zika syndrome due to the lack of follow-up studies29; however, congenital Zika virus infection with severe brain damage should have a poor prognosis.29 Knowledge of the spectrum of this syndrome can be helpful in identifying which cases could have higher chances of worse outcomes. It is probable that infants with arthrogryposis will have worse prognoses, especially in motor development, even if they do not have severe brain lesions or microcephaly.
Despite the limitations, especially regarding the small number of patients and lack of a control group for quantitative analysis, this study is the first to analyze spinal cord MR imaging abnormalities in children with congenital Zika virus infection without arthrogryposis. In addition, this study raises the alarming hypothesis that children without clear signs of impairment (eg, microcephaly and arthrogryposis) can have brain and spinal cord imaging abnormalities probably caused by the Zika virus, a possibility that is starting to be seen in clinical practice.
The 8 children with congenital Zika syndrome without arthrogryposis did not have this major clinical manifestation of spinal cord impairment but had mild radiologic spinal cord abnormalities, such as a qualitative decrease in spinal cord thickness, especially at the thoracic segment, and mildly reduced anterior nerve roots at the conus medullaris. Therefore, we can suppose that there are, currently unidentified in the normal population of the epidemic area, more children with a mild degree of damage not only in the brain but also in the spinal cord. The identified cases could correspond to only the “tip of the iceberg,” represented by microcephaly and arthrogryposis, of the congenital Zika syndrome.
Conclusions
Most of the infants with congenital Zika syndrome had some degree of spinal cord thickness reduction, which is predominant in the thoracic segment in cases without arthrogryposis and in the entire spinal cord in cases with arthrogryposis. In addition, there is thickness reduction of anterior nerve roots of the conus medullaris in both groups, being more severe in infants with arthrogryposis. With regard to brain lesions, periventricular calcifications were more frequent in infants with arthrogryposis. Although without statistical significance, the prominence of the anterior median fissure of the spinal cord was found only in infants with arthrogryposis; brain stem hypoplasia was present in all infants with arthrogryposis; brain stem and cerebellum calcifications were more frequent; and polymicrogyria was absent in this group.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are especially grateful to the anesthesiology staff, Drs Antonio Monteiro and Cristovam A. de Lira Terceiro; the neuropediatrician, Dr Ana van der Linden; the medical student, Julia Sales Machado; the MR imaging technician, Edineide Cristina Leite Lopes; and the Centro Diagnostico Multimagem for their help.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- AACD
Association for Assistance of Disabled Children
- GRE
gradient recalled-echo
- IgM
immunoglobulin M
REFERENCES
- 1. Dick GW, Kitchen SF, Haddow AJ. Zika virus. I: isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1952;46:509–20 10.1016/0035-9203(52)90042-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Dick GW. Zika virus, II: pathogenicity and physical properties. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1952;46:521–34 10.1016/0035-9203(52)90043-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Macnamara FN. Zika virus: a report on three cases of human infection during an epidemic of jaundice in Nigeria. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 1954;48:139–45 10.1016/0035-9203(54)90006-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Duffy MR, Chen TH, Hancock WT, et al. Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia. N Engl J Med 2009;360:2536–43 10.1056/NEJMoa0805715 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Cauchemez S, Besnard M, Bompard P, et al. Association between Zika virus and microcephaly in French Polynesia, 2013–15: a retrospective study. Lancet 2016;387:2125–32 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00651-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Campos GS, Bandeira AC, Sardi SI. Zika virus outbreak, Bahia, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:1885–86 10.3201/eid2110.150847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Cardoso CW, Paploski IA, Kikuti M, et al. Outbreak of exanthematous illness associated with Zika, Chikungunya, and Dengue Viruses, Salvador, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 2015;21:2274–76 10.3201/eid2112.151167 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ministério da Saúde (Brazil). Protocolo de vigilância e resposta à ocorrência de microcefalia e/ou alterações do sistema nervoso central (SNC). March 10, 2016. http://combateaedes.saude.gov.br/images/sala-de-situacao/Microcefalia-Protocolo-de-vigilancia-e-resposta-10mar2016–18h.pdf. Accessed December 19, 2016.
- 9. Brito C. Zika virus: a new chapter in the history of medicine. Acta Med Port 2015;28:679–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.World Health Organization. Situation Report. Zika virus, microcephaly, Guillain-Barre syndrome. February 2, 2017. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254507/1/zikasitrep2Feb17-eng.pdf. Accessed February 8, 2017.
- 11. de Fatima Vasco Aragao M, van der Linden V, Brainer-Lima AM, et al. Clinical features and neuroimaging (CT and MRI) findings in presumed Zika virus related congenital infection and microcephaly: retrospective case series study. BMJ 2016;353:i1901 10.1136/bmj.i1901 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ventura CV, Maia M, Ventura BV, et al. Ophthalmological findings in infants with microcephaly and presumable intra-uterus Zika virus infection. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2016;79:1–3 10.5935/0004-2749.20160002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R, et al. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016;47:6–7 10.1002/uog.15831 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Schuler-Faccini L, Ribeiro EM, Feitosa IM, et al. ; Brazilian Medical Genetics Society–Zika Embryopathy Task Force. Possible association between Zika virus infection and microcephaly: Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2016;65:59–62 10.15585/mmwr.mm6503e2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Bamshad M, Van Heest AE, Pleasure D. Arthrogryposis: a review and update. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91(suppl 4):40–46 10.2106/JBJS.I.00281 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Banker BQ. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: spectrum of pathologic changes. Hum Pathol 1986;17:656–72 10.1016/S0046-8177(86)80177-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Fedrizzi E, Botteon G, Inverno M, et al. Neurogenic arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: clinical and MRI findings. Pediatr Neurol 1993;9:343–48 10.1016/0887-8994(93)90102-I [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Gordon N. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. Brain Dev 1998;20:507–11 10.1016/S0387-7604(98)00037-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kalampokas E, Kalampokas T, Sofoudis C, et al. Diagnosing arthrogryposis multiplex congenita: a review. ISRN Obstet Gynecol 2012:264918 10.5402/2012/264918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Mennen U, van Heest A, Ezaki MB, et al. Arthrogryposis multiplex congenita. J Hand Surg Br 2005;30:468–74 10.1016/j.jhsb.2005.06.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Yousem D, Grossman R. Anatomy and degenerative diseases of the spine. In: Neuroradiology: The Requisites. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby/Elsevier; 2010:515–42 [Google Scholar]
- 22. Wilson DA, Prince JR. John Caffey award. MR imaging determination of the location of the normal conus medullaris throughout childhood. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1989;152:1029–32 10.2214/ajr.152.5.1029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Melo AS, Aguiar RS, Amorim MM, et al. Congenital Zika virus infection: beyond neonatal microcephaly. JAMA Neurol 2016;73:1407–16 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.3720 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. van der Linden V, Filho EL, Lins OG, et al. Congenital Zika syndrome with arthrogryposis: retrospective case series study. BMJ 2016;354:i3899 10.1136/bmj.i3899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Hazin AN, Poretti A, Turchi Martelli CM, et al. Computed tomographic findings in microcephaly associated with Zika virus. N Engl J Med 2016;374:2193–95 10.1056/NEJMc1603617 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Mlakar J, Korva M, Tul N, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med 2016;374:951–58 10.1056/NEJMoa1600651 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Tang H, Hammack C, Ogden SC, et al. Zika virus infects human cortical neural progenitors and attenuates their growth. Cell Stem Cell 2016;18:587–90 10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Barkovich AJ, Gressens P, Evrard P. Formation, maturation, and disorders of brain neocortex. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1992;13:423–46 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Vouga M, Baud D. Imaging of congenital Zika virus infection: the route to identification of prognostic factors. Prenat Diagn 2016;36:799–811 10.1002/pd.4880 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.