Skip to main content
Frontiers in Medicine logoLink to Frontiers in Medicine
. 2021 Mar 2;7:582272. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.582272

Glomerulonephritis in AKI: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Intervention

Francesco Pesce 1,, Emma D Stea 1,, Michele Rossini 1, Marco Fiorentino 1, Fausta Piancone 1, Barbara Infante 2, Giovanni Stallone 2, Giuseppe Castellano 2, Loreto Gesualdo 1,*
PMCID: PMC7960664  PMID: 33738291

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is increasingly emerging as a global emergency. Sepsis, major surgery, and nephrotoxic drugs are the main causes of AKI in hospitalized patients. However, glomerulonephritis accounts for about 10% of AKI episodes in adults, mainly related to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis resulting from granulomatous polyangiitis (GPA, Wegener granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), and anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease. Also, diffuse proliferative lupus nephritis, immunoglobulin A nephropathy, post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis, mixed cryoglobulinemia, mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis, membranous nephropathy, hemolytic uremic syndrome, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and scleroderma can induce acute renal failure. Early diagnosis of AKI due to glomerulonephritis is crucial for prompt, effective management to improve short- and long-term outcomes. Kidney biopsy is the gold standard for the diagnosis of glomerular disease, but it is not frequently performed in critically ill patients because of their clinical conditions. In this setting, a growing number of diagnostic assays can support the working hypothesis, including antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCAs), anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies, anti-GBM antibodies, antistreptolysin O and anti-DNase B antibodies, cryoglobulins, antiphospholipid antibodies, and complement levels. Therapeutic strategies in AKI patients with glomerulonephritis include high-dose corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, and plasma exchange. This article reviews the wide spectrum of glomerulopathies associated with AKI, describing the immunological mechanisms underlying glomerular diseases and presenting an overview of the therapeutic options.

Keywords: AKI, glomerulonephritis, antibodies, complement, immunosuppression

Introduction

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe medical condition involving up to 10 million people worldwide (1), with an increasing global incidence especially in hospitalized patients (2). AKI affects ~10–15% of hospital inpatients and more than 50% of patients hospitalized in the intensive care units (ICUs) (2, 3). Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is necessary in 5–6% of critically ill patients and is characterized by an increased risk of progression to chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) (about 10% annually) (46). The definition of AKI is based on standard criteria such as serum creatinine and/or urine output (7, 8), although several biomarkers have recently been proposed in this clinical setting (9). Severe short- and long-term consequences are frequently associated with AKI, and the mortality rate in critically ill patients is still significant, ranging from 37% to 60% (4, 1012). Moreover, patients who survive AKI present a major long-term mortality rate and an increased risk of developing CKD (13) and other chronic comorbidities (1419).

Glomerulonephritis accounts for about 10% of AKI in adults (20). AKI episodes in glomerular disease are usually due to rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis (RPGN), in which the renal function declines over days or weeks. The most common causes are small-vessel vasculitis and anti-glomerular basement membrane (GBM) disease, although other glomerular diseases may manifest with acute renal impairment, including IgA nephropathy (IgAN), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), lupus nephritis, and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis (16). Furthermore, acute renal failure in glomerulonephritis can also result from non-glomerular conditions such as acute tubular necrosis (ATN) from renal hypoperfusion or the nephrotic syndrome and drug- or radiocontrast agent-induced tubular epithelial cell injury.

Early diagnosis and prompt, effective treatment of glomerular disease may dramatically change the disease course and improve patient outcomes (21). In this scenario, kidney biopsy remains the gold standard for the diagnosis of kidney disease when the patient's clinical condition allows the performance of this procedure (22). This article reviews the main glomerular diseases manifesting with AKI (summarized in Table 1), describing the immunological mechanisms underlying glomerular diseases and the potential therapeutic strategies, summarizing the main features.

Table 1.

Summary of key features for each disease.

Disease Specific mechanisms of acute damage Diagnosis Kidney biopsy Treatment Apheresis Prognostic markers
Anti- GBM disease Autoantibody against the NC1 domain of the α3-chain of type IV collagen (46, 47) Clinical signs
Anti-GBM antibody
CT
Kidney/lung biopsy
Diffuse proliferative GN, crescents, necrosis
± tubular loss
IF: Linear deposition of IgG and C3
CYC (2 mg/kg/day) + Methylprednisolone (1 g/day for 3 days followed by tapering with oral prednisone) ± TPE TPE (Category III, Grade 2B)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: Daily or every other day
Duration: at least 10–20 days, or until resolution of evidence of ongoing glomerular or pulmonary injury
Glomerular lesions:
- crescents necrosis
- Tubular damage
Dialysis dependent
sCr > 600 μmol/L
Small Vessel Vasculitis ANCAs (PR3; MPO) and Neutrophils activation Clinical signs
ANCA antibody
Radiological investigations
Tissues biopsies/Kidney biopsy
Necrotizing and extra-capillary crescentic GN
Vascular segmental fibrinoid necrosis, sclerosis, thrombosis
Induction therapy: Methylprednisolone (7 mg/Kg/day for 3 days followed by oral prednisolone 1 mg/Kg/day) + CYC (2 mg/kg/day) or, in alternative, RTX (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks)
Maintenance therapy: AZA (1–2 mg/kg/day) or MMF (up to 1 g twice daily) or MTX (0.3 mg/kg/wk, maximum 25 mg/wk) or RTX
TPE (Category I, Grade 1A)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: Daily or every other day
Duration: median number is 7, over a median period of 14 days, up to 12 for further improvement of renal function BVAS
Glomerular lesions:
- focal
- crescents
- mixed
- sclerotic
SLE: lupus nephritis class IV Immunocomplexes, complement, leucocytes, TMA Kidney biopsy Endocapillary or extracapillary GN, glomerulosclerosis, sub-endothelial immune deposits, tubular atrophy, interstitial fibrosis
IF: “full house” pattern
Induction therapy: CYC (low-dose: 500 mg every 2 weeks for 3 months or high-dose: 0.5–1 g/m2 monthly for 6 months)/MMF (2–3 g/daily) + Corticosteroids. In alternative, RTX (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks)
Maintenance therapy: Low dose Prednisone (<10 mg/day) + AZA (1.5–2 mg/kg/day) or MMF (1–2 g/day in two doses) for at least 12 months after complete remission. CNIs (in patients intolerant to MMF or AZA)
TPE (Category II, Grade 2C)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: LN or DAH: daily or every other day; Other severe complications: 1–3 times per week
Duration: course of 3–6 TPE
Glomerular lesions:
- crescents
- necrosis
Heavy proteinuria
Racial background
IgAN Massive hematuria; erytro-phagocytosis process, crescents Kidney biopsy Mesangial hypercellularity, focal segmental necrotizing GN, crescents, glomerulosclerosis, tubule-interstitial inflammation ± fibrosis High-dose corticosteroids (Methylprednisolone 1 g/daily for three consecutive days, followed by oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/day and subsequent tapering/Oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 2 months followed by tapering) for 6 months + CYC (1–2 mg/kg/day) for 3 months, followed by AZA (1–2 mg/kg/day) for 3 months TPE (Category III, Grade 2C)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: 4–11 over 21 days
Duration: until clinical resolution
High sCr
Crescents
Duration of hematuria
Post-streptococcal GN Immunocomplexes, complement, leucocytes Clinical signs
Antistreptolysin O and anti–DNase B antibodies
Diffuse endocapillary GN, monocytes and lymphocytes infiltration No specific immunosuppressive treatment TPE (Category III, Grade 2B)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: Daily or every other day
Duration: 3–6 TPE over 1–2 weeks
Deficiency of complement regulatory proteins
Nephrotic proteinuria
Age
Diabetic nephropathy
TMA TMA TTP: ADAMTS 13 activity, Anti ADAMTS13 autoantibody
STEC-HUS: STEC (cultured test) or STX (P.C.R.)
aHUS: microangiopathic haemolytic anemia, acute kidney injury, ADAMTS13 and STEC-HUS negativity
Intraluminal platelet thrombi, partial or complete obstruction of vessel lumina, myointimal proliferation and reduplication of the lamina densa, sever ischemic change TTP: ADAMTS 13 auto-antibodies: TPE +/prednisone/prednisolone or RTX
Maintenance therapy: PI: Caplacizumab + TPE + immunosuppressive therapy
STEC-HUS: i.v 10–15 ml/kg/h of isotonic solution; Eculizumab (900 mg/ weakly for 4 weeks, followed by 1,200 mg every 2 weeks) and/or TPE/PI
aHUS: Eculizumab (900 mg/ weakly for 4 weeks, followed by 1,200 mg every 2 weeks)
FHAA-mediated aHUS: TPE + immunosuppressive therapy
TPE (Category III, Grade 2C)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: Daily
Duration: No standardized approach, duration and schedule should be made based upon patient response and condition
TTP: ADAMTS 13 activity; severe neurological signs; haemolysis
STEC-HUS: severe neurological signs; haemolysis
aHUS: genetic background
MPGN and Mixed Cryoglobulinemia Immunocomplexes Cryoglobulins, HCV markers; clinical signs/ symptoms Mesangial and endocapillary proliferation, extracellular matrix expansion, diffuse leucocytes and monocytes infiltration, double-contouring of the GBM, intraluminal thrombi TPE + RTX(375 mg7m2/week for 4 weeks)/CYC (2 mg/Kg/day for 2–4 months), + i.v. methylprednisolone (0.5/1 g/Kg/day for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone), + antiviral therapy TPE (Category II, Grade 2B)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: Every 1–3 days
Duration: 3–8 procedures for acute symptoms, weekly or monthly maintenance treatments to prevent recurrent symptoms
High sCr
Nephrotic proteinuria
Severe hypertension
>50% crescents
Marked interstitial fibrosis
Membranous nephropathy Volume depletion
Ischemic tubular damage
Kidney biopsy Uniform increase in thickness of glomerular capillary walls, double-contouring and “spikes” of the GBM.
IF: Diffuse, finely granular deposition of IgG along outer surface of all capillary walls
Volume correction Severe hypoalbuminemia, age, male sex
Scleroderma Ischemia, microangiopathy Clinical signs; ANA and anti scl-70 antibody Malignant hypertensions lesions, TMA in small interlobular and arcuate arteries Glomerular ischemic collapse; fibrinoid necrosis ± tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis ACE-i
TPE/ECP
TPE (Category III, Grade 2C)
Volume treated: 1–1.5 TPV
Frequency: 1–3 per week
Duration: course of 6 TPE over the 2–3 weeks followed by 4 weekly treatments. Long-term TPE protocol (2–3 weekly for 2 weeks, 1 TPE weekly for 3 months, and 1 TPE every other week as a maintenance therapy) was also used. ECP
Volume treated: Typically, 1.5 L of whole blood processed
Frequency and Duration: Two procedures on consecutive days (one series) every 4–6 wk for 6–12 months
Anti-DNA polymerase

GBM, Glomerular Basement Membrane; CT, Computer Tomography; GN, glomerulonephritis; IF, immunofluorescence; CYC, cyclophosphamide; TPE, therapeutic plasma exchange; sCr, serum creatinine; ANCAs, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies, PR3, proteinase 3; MPO, myeloperosidase; RTX, Rituximab; AZA, azathioprine; MMF, mycophenolate; MTX, methotrexate; BVAS, Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score; SLE, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; TMA, Thrombotic Microangiopathy; IgA N, IgA nephropathy; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura; STEC-HUS, Shiga-toxin producing E. coli-associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; STEX, Shiga-toxin; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; aHUS: atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; PI, Plasma Infusion; i.v., intravenous; FHAA-HUS, Factor H antibody associated Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome; MPGN, Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis; ANA, Anti-nuclear antibody; anti scl-70, anti-topoisomerase antibody, ACE-i, ACE inhibitors; ECP, Extracorporeal photopheresis.

Anti-GBM Disease

Epidemiology and Disease Pathogenesis

Anti-GBM disease is a rare but severe immunological disorder manifesting with RPGN and pulmonary complications (lung hemorrhage). It accounts for about 5% of all cases of RPGN and affects especially young males and the elderly (23, 24). A genetic predisposition has been reported: anti-GBM disease is strongly associated with class II human leukocyte antigen (HLA), including DRB1*1501 and DR4 alleles, whereas DR1 and DR7 confer strong protection (25). Furthermore, several environmental triggers (smoking, hydrocarbon exposure, and drugs) appear to be important in the disease etiology (24, 26). The pathogenesis of the disease is immunological and related to the formation of antibodies specifically targeting the NC1 domain of the α3-chain of type IV collagen localized in the glomerular and alveolar basement membranes (24, 27, 28): complement activation, phagocyte accumulation, and T-cell recruitment after immunocomplex deposition contribute to the extent of the glomerular damage (29).

Clinical Presentations and Diagnosis

Patients typically present a mild prodromal phase followed by severe clinical features with macroscopic hematuria and/or AKI. Lung involvement is often characterized by hemoptysis and dyspnea that characterize the Goodpasture syndrome. Kidney and respiratory functions decline more rapidly than in any other form of RPGN, and mortality is often due to renal failure requiring RRT or to massive alveolar bleeding (30). The clinical suspicion, based on the simultaneous renal and pulmonary involvement, is a critical step to improve patient outcomes. The rapid renal function decline, the presence of a very active urinary sediment, and the scarce systemic involvement differentiate anti-GBM disease from vasculitis and lupus nephritis. An atypical variant of the disease, with no significant pulmonary involvement and undetectable serum anti-GBM antibodies, has also been described (30). Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) can be detected in rare cases showing double antibody positivity. This double-positive variant presents a bad prognosis requiring early and more aggressive treatment (30).

The diagnosis is confirmed by the detection of circulating anti-GBM antibodies, although their levels do not correlate with disease severity (27). Kidney biopsy is essential as it indicates the extent and severity of the renal lesions. The histological picture in anti-GBM disease is usually characterized by diffuse extracapillary proliferation with extensive crescent formation, often with associated fibrinoid necrosis of the glomerular tuft. Different degrees of glomerulosclerosis (as a result of previous proliferative lesions), tubular necrosis, and interstitial inflammation can also be observed. A pathognomonic sign of the disease is the linear deposition of IgG and, often, C3 (75%) along the glomerular and sometimes (10–67%) also distal tubular basement membranes and the alveolar basal membrane in the lung. The extent of glomerular involvement (percentage of crescents and fibrinoid necrosis) is correlated with the prognosis (29, 30).

Treatment

Since the clinical course is rapidly progressive, early treatment is needed, to remove circulating anti-GBM antibodies and reduce renal inflammation. Immunosuppressive therapy should be started immediately, except in patients with minimal renal involvement or irreversible kidney disease without lung involvement (31). The Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) clinical practice guidelines for glomerulonephritis recommend the use of corticosteroids (usually intravenous pulses of methylprednisolone up to 1,000 mg/day for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone of 1 mg/kg/day tapered to 20 mg/day for 6 weeks), oral cyclophosphamide (CYC, 2 mg/kg/day), and plasmapheresis (daily exchange of 1–1.5 volume of plasma against 5% human albumin for 14 days) in patients affected by anti-GBM disease (3133). Lung hemorrhage is usually responsive to this treatment, and hemoptysis resolves within a few days. Renal recovery is more variable, and the clinical response to therapy is usually slower in patients requiring RRT and/or with serum creatinine values exceeding 600 μmol/L and in patients with histological evidence of a high proportion of crescents (34, 35). Oral prednisone and CYC are generally discontinued after 6 and 3 months, respectively, while plasmapheresis is continued for at least 14 days or until anti-GBM antibodies become undetectable.

Small-Vessel Vasculitis

Epidemiology and Disease Pathogenesis

Small-vessel vasculitis is a group of inflammatory systemic diseases characterized by a segmental necrotizing polyangiitis of small vessels, including GPA (Wegener granulomatosis), microscopic polyangiitis (MPA), eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Churg–Strauss syndrome), and renal-limited vasculitis (36). The first two diseases account for the majority of cases of RPGN, presenting as an emergency in the critical care setting (37, 38). The diseases can occur at any age, but the prevalence is greatest at ages 50–70 years, with a slight predominance in Caucasians and male gender (36). Small-vessel vasculitis is associated with the production of ANCAs, which have a central role in the disease pathogenesis, since they are directed against specific enzymes found within the cytoplasmic granules of neutrophils and monocytes, proteinase 3 (PR3), and myeloperoxidase (MPO) antigens (39, 40). Genetic background (specific α1-antitrypsin and neutrophil FcRγ111 receptor genotypes) and environmental triggers (in particular, infections and drugs) are reported as potential co-players in disease pathogenesis (4145); specific HLA polymorphisms are associated with disease predisposition (46). After expression of PR3 and MPO on the surface following trigger conditions (infections), ANCAs bind these antigens, inducing neutrophil degranulation and the release of inflammatory mediators (cytokines, reactive oxygen species, and lytic enzymes), leading to endothelial damage (47, 48). Neutrophils also release PR3 and MPO, which adhere to the endothelium and induce in situ immunocomplex formation. Monocytes/macrophages, T cells, and complement system are also involved in the pathogenic process (4952).

Clinical Presentations and Diagnosis

Wegener granulomatosis is characterized by a wide range of clinical manifestations, including RPGN with the formation of extracapillary crescents, alveolar hemorrhage, episcleritis, rhinitis, sinusitis, hearing loss, purpura, peripheral neuropathy, subglottic tracheal stenosis, and angina abdominis (53). The disease course is often recurrent, with relapses occurring within a few years after disease remission. In patients with MPA, renal involvement is always reported, while respiratory tract diseases are less common; moreover, the frequency of relapses is lower than that in Wegener granulomatosis.

The clinical manifestations drive the diagnosis, which is supported by the detection of circulating ANCA. Anti-PR3 autoantibodies [cytoplasmic ANCA (c-ANCA)] are positive in about 90% of patients with active Wegener granulomatosis, and anti-MPO autoantibodies [perinuclear ANCA (p-ANCA)] are typically detected in about 80% of patients with active MPA (54, 55). Typically, ANCA levels are higher at the onset, and their levels are directly correlated with disease activity; in fact, a significant increase in ANCA levels is reported in relapses. These antibodies are also found in other immunological disorders (inflammatory bowel disease, autoimmune liver disease, and rheumatoid arthritis). A limited percentage of patients (10–20%) affected by small-vessel vasculitis does not show ANCA positivity (56). Thus, ANCA negativity may not exclude the diagnosis in the presence of clinical symptoms. Radiological investigations and tissue biopsies can support the diagnosis.

Although kidney biopsy in these patients is considered to be at high risk, since bleeding complications are frequent due to vessel inflammation, histology can be very useful for predicting the response to treatment and clinical outcome.

ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis is histologically characterized by necrotizing and crescentic glomerulonephritis, with a variable degree of glomerular involvement (57). Granulomas are a specific feature of Wegener granulomatosis (58, 59). Immunofluorescence shows little or no glomerular staining for immunoglobulins or complement, and this feature is typically termed a “pauci-immune” staining pattern. Electron microscopy demonstrates subendothelial edema, microthrombosis, and degranulation of neutrophils, without immune deposits (60). Vascular lesions feature fibrinoid necrosis, sclerosis, and thrombosis. Apart from glomerular and vascular lesions, acute and chronic tubulointerstitial lesions are critical risk factors indicating disease severity and progression. A recent histological classification comprises four categories of glomerular lesions, which correlate the loss of function with increasing degrees of severity: focal, crescentic, mixed, and sclerotic. Kidney survival at 5 years is 93% in the focal, 76% in the crescentic, 61% the mixed, and 50% in the sclerotic class (55). A growing number of studies have investigated the utility of TIMP 1, C–X–C motif chemokine ligand 13, and matrix metalloproteinase-3 as biomarkers of ANCA-associated vasculitis and for treatment assessment (61, 62).

Treatment

A prompt diagnosis and early, appropriate treatment are essential to prevent loss of renal function and progression to CKD. Kidney and patient survival rates range between 65 and 75% at 5 years after appropriate treatment (63). KDIGO guidelines recommend the use of high-dose corticosteroids (intravenous methylprednisolone ar 7 mg/kg/day for 3 days followed by oral prednisone at 1 or 1 mg/kg/day of oral prednisone tapered to 0.25 mg/day for 3 months) plus oral or intravenous CYC (2 mg/kg/day or 0.5 g/m2 monthly, respectively. Combined treatment induces remission in about 90% of patients at 6 months. When CYC is contraindicated or the disease is resistant to this regime, the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) (375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 weeks) plus steroids is recommended (2729). In this context, the RAVE and RITUXIVAS studies have shown that RTX is equivalent to CYC in terms of efficacy, with a similar risk profile (64, 65).

The addition of plasma exchange is recommended for patients requiring dialysis, with rapid increases of serum creatinine, diffuse pulmonary hemorrhage, and/or with an overlap syndrome of ANCA vasculitis and anti-GBM disease (3133). Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) reduces the development of ESKD by ~40% (66), but the true efficacy is still questioned (67).

During maintenance therapy, CYC is replaced by azathioprine (AZA, 1–2 mg/kg/day) or alternatively mycophenolate (MMF, up to 1 g twice daily) or methotrexate (initially 0.3 mg/kg/week, maximum 25 mg/week). An alternative regimen includes the use of CYC for the induction treatment and perhaps RTX for maintenance (32, 33). Patients should be monitored for general symptoms and laboratory data, as well as urinary RBC counts, C-reactive protein, renal function, and ANCA levels. A rapid response to treatment is typical, with a significant improvement of the clinical condition within few weeks. High ANCA levels may persist for several months. The maintenance treatment is carried out for at least 18 months up to 3 years in Wegener granulomatosis and 2 years in MPA if no relapses occur (68), which can often happen during immunosuppression tapering and may require a further short course of high-dose corticosteroids or CYC.

In ANCA-associated pauci-immune glomerulonephritis, the mortality rate within the first year of diagnosis is reported to be about 20% of cases: ESKD occurs in up to 25% of the patients within 4 years after diagnosis (63).

Other Glomerulonephritis Forms That Cause AKI

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Renal involvement in patients with SLE disease is associated with a worse outcome and higher mortality. Kidney damage is characterized by the deposition of immunocomplexes, complement activation, leukocyte infiltrations, and microangiopathic thrombosis probably driven by the type I interferon signature, involving all renal compartments (glomeruli, vessels, and tubule interstitium) (69). The histological findings in patients with lupus nephritis (LN) may range from initial mesangial immune deposits [class I in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification] to diffuse global glomerulosclerosis (class VI) (70); however, <10% of all patients with LN develop RPGN, which is associated with the diffuse proliferative glomerulonephritis form (Class IV).

Clinically, LN should be suspected in the presence of urinary abnormalities (hematuria) and nephrotic proteinuria; in addition, patients with Class IV LN typically exhibit acute impairment of renal function and hypertension. Low complement levels and positivity for anti-dsDNA antibodies may confirm the clinical suspicion. However, renal biopsy is crucial to assess the extent of renal lesions and to tailor appropriate treatment (21, 71, 72). In class IV LN, more than 50% of the glomeruli exhibit endocapillary hypercellularity and/or cellular crescents associated with other active (i.e., fibrinoid necrosis, karyorrhexis, presence of neutrophils, abundant subendothelial immunocomplex deposits, and interstitial inflammation) and chronic lesions (global and segmental glomerulosclerosis, adhesions, fibrous crescents, interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy). Immunofluorescence shows a typical “full house” pattern, characterized by the evidence of IgG, IgM, IgA, C3, and C1q immune deposits. Electron microscopy reveals abundant electron-dense subendothelial deposits conferring a “wire loop” profile to the capillary walls (70, 73).

In patients with class IV LN, induction therapy can be based on intravenous CYC (low dose: 500 mg every 2 weeks for 3 months or high dose: 0.5–1 g/m2 monthly for 6 months) or MMF (2–3 g/day) combined with oral glucocorticoids (0.5–1.0 mg/kg/day) with or without three pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone (32, 33). In addition, RTX and other biological agents may be useful in class IV LN and in refractory LN as induction therapy (71). The induction therapy may be associated with TPE, as reported in Table 1 (67). After the induction treatment, maintenance therapy is required; oral AZA (1.5–2.5 mg/kg/day) or MMF (1–2 g/day in divided doses) is recommended and effective, combined with low-dose oral prednisone (≤10 mg/day) (3133). The maintenance therapy should be continued for at least 1 year after complete remission is achieved, while a repeat kidney biopsy is required when complete remission has not been achieved. The maintenance phase of the Aspreva Lupus Management Study (ALMS) showed that regardless of the induction therapy, MMF was superior to AZA in maintaining the renal response and preventing relapse of proliferative LN: the overall treatment failure rate in the MMF group was half that observed in the AZA group (16.4 vs. 32.4%), and renal flares were significantly higher in patients treated with AZA (12.9 vs. 23.4%) (74). The superiority of MMF demonstrated in the ALMS was not apparent in the MAINTAIN nephritis trial, published in 2010 (probably due to differences in the study design): however, renal flares occurred in 19% of the MMF group, compared with 25% of the AZA group, suggesting that MMF should be considered the drug of choice (75). Finally, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) should be used for maintenance therapy in patients intolerant to MMF and AZA.

IgAN

IgAN is the most common primary glomerulonephritis worldwide; it is characterized by persistent microscopic hematuria, mild proteinuria, and episodes of gross hematuria concurrently with upper respiratory tract infections (76). However, RPGN has been described in one third of patients with IgAN where histology reveals >50% crescents. Crescentic IgAN is a critical condition, leading to CKD and ESKD in a few years and so requiring prompt, efficacious treatment (77, 78). High-dose corticosteroids and CYC are recommended (79, 80). Corticosteroid treatment can be based on methylprednisolone (1 g/day for three consecutive days), followed by oral prednisone 0.5 mg/kg/day and subsequent tapering or, alternatively, on oral prednisone 1 mg/kg/day for 2 months followed by tapering (0.2 mg/kg monthly) within 6 months. CYC [1–2 mg/kg/day, based on the patient's glomerular filtration rate (GFR)] should be administered for 3 months, followed by AZA (1–2 mg/kg/day) for the following 3 months. TPE can be combined with immunosuppressive treatments until clinical improvement is achieved (67).

In addition, AKI episodes in IgAN patients can be due to massive hematuria of glomerular origin (81). In cases of massive hematuria, tubular cell damage has been described as the consequence of red blood cell cast formation and intratubular obstructions, combined with erythrophagocytosis processes (81). The hemoglobin products released by red blood cells induce oxidative stress, inflammation, podocytes, and tubular cell apoptosis and consequently cell detachment and fibrosis (82). In this setting, adequate and sustained hydration is crucial to prevent renal damage and enhance renal recovery. Renal biopsy should be performed in cases of persistent kidney function impairment despite supportive care and massive hydration.

Post-streptococcal Glomerulonephritis

Post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis typically occurs in children in developing countries at 1–3 weeks after upper respiratory tract infections (83). Clinically, 20% of affected patients develop a classic nephritic syndrome characterized by hematuria, hypertension, oliguria, and worsening renal function. The diagnosis is based on the presence of these symptoms associated with the detection of antistreptolysin O and anti-DNase B antibodies and low C3 (83). In this setting, renal biopsy is not mandatory since the prognosis is usually excellent and no specific treatments are needed (21). However, 1% of patients develop crescentic glomerulonephritis, which is sometimes associated with ANCA (83). The role of immunosuppression in these patients is debated. Although there is no evidence yet from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the use of high-dose corticosteroids can be considered in patients with extensive glomerular crescents and RPGN.

TMA

TMA is a clinical phenotype which includes multiple diseases leading to thrombosis of arterioles and capillary vessels. Laboratory findings (thrombocytopenia with microangiopathic hemolytic anemia) lead to a suspicion of TMAs and reflect the mechanical disruption of red blood cells and platelets in the microvasculature (84). Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) are the two classic TMA disorders (85). TTP is mainly characterized by neurological involvement, while only a limited proportion of patients (25%) show renal involvement; TTP patients usually exhibit congenital or acquired ADAMTS 13 deficiency leading to the accumulation of the ultra-large multimers of von Willebrand factors (vWFs) that cause platelet aggregation and consequently microvascular thrombosis (86). Conversely, kidney injury typically occurs in all patients with HUS, as a consequence of the massive thrombotic capillaries' occlusion (87). The histological features comprise microvascular thrombosis, swelling, and detachment of the endothelial cells from the GBM; patchy cortical necrosis; and focal-segmental sclerosis, which is a long-term sequela of acute HUS (88, 89).

HUS includes STEC-HUS due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection (9092), pneumococcal HUS caused by infections with Streptococcus pneumoniae, and genetic HUS, also called aHUS (93). STEC-HUS occurs most frequently in pediatric patients (the incidence is five to six children per 10,000 children population per year). Patients typically present bloody diarrhea and gastroenteritis 6–10 days before the development of TMA. STX closely adheres to gut epithelial cells, causing apoptosis and destruction of the brush border of the villi. Then, the toxin enters the circulation: in the kidney, STX is internalized via the Gb3 receptor and releases a protease into the cytoplasm. This protease inhibits protein synthesis and activates inflammatory pathways, inducing cell death (92). The diagnosis is driven by the clinical suspicion and the detection of STEC (cultured test) or STEX (polymerase chain reaction). Prompt intravenous hydration (10–15 ml/kg/h of isotonic solution) is recommended as soon as E. coli infection is suspected, in order to reduce the systemic effects of STX (94, 95). The use of antibiotics must be avoided, because they increase STX gene expression and induce massive STX release. Only azithromycin can be administered to a very limited number of children presenting with bacteremia (94). Supportive management of anemia, renal failure, and hypertension is required in these patients. In cases of severe clinical manifestations and neurological involvement, eculizumab and/or plasma exchange can be used as rescue therapy (88). The prognosis in children is generally favorable, and up to 70–85% of patients recover renal function.

aHUS is a multifactorial rare disease linked to an uncontrolled activation of the alternative complement pathway. About 60% of aHUS patients carry genetic variants or risk haplotypes in genes of the alternative pathway (CFH, CFI, CFB, MCP, C3, CFHR1-5, and THBD) and/or in diacylglycerol kinase E (DGKE). Genetic background accounts for different outcomes, as response to therapy and risk of relapses may vary depending on the underlying mutation; in addition, specific environmental factors (pregnancy, drugs, infections, etc.) have been reported as triggers in disease pathogenesis (93). aHUS is a life-threatening disorder requiring immediate diagnosis and treatment, often in the ICU. In addition, 50% of aHUS patients progress to ESKD, and the mortality rate during the acute phase of the disease is significant. The diagnosis of aHUS is made on exclusion of STEC infection and ADAMTS 13 deficiency; moreover, a genetic screening should be recommended, particularly in patients who are candidates for kidney transplantation. Treatment should be promptly started. The use of eculizumab in the aHUS treatment has dramatically changed short- and long-term outcomes in this setting and is currently the first-line treatment. The attack dose is 900 mg weekly for 4 weeks, followed by 1,200 mg at week 5 and then every 2 weeks: however, the duration of treatment is not yet well established. The Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency have recently approved a long-acting anti-C5 antibody (ravulizumab) for the treatment of aHUS, to be administered every 8 weeks (half-life of approximately 51 days).

It is important to remember that patients with DGKE variants do not respond to eculizumab therapy and thus pose an open challenge for scientists and physicians (96). Finally, 3–8% of aHUS patients present antibodies to complement factor H protein (FHAA), which are associated with a homozygous deficiency of FHR1 (85%) and homozygous deletion of CFHR3-CFHR1 (97). In this setting, plasma exchange alone was associated with disease recurrence (58%), CKD (39%), ESKD (27%), and death (9%) (98). A combination of TPE and immunosuppression reduces the antibody production and improves patient outcomes (99, 100).

Membranoproliferative Glomerulonephritis (MPGN) and Mixed Cryoglobulinemia

In MPGN, the histological pattern includes a group of chronic immune-mediated diseases characterized by GBM thickening and proliferative changes (101). On the basis of the pathophysiological processes, MPG is currently classified as immunocomplex-mediated MPGN and complement-mediated GNs (DDD and C3GN) (102). Among these disorders, mixed cryoglobulinemia is the most prevalent disorder in older adults (103). Mixed cryoglobulinemia is a small-vessel vasculitis characterized by the precipitation of circulating immunocomplexes after cold exposure (polyclonal IgG with or without monoclonal IgM with rheumatoid factor activity), involving several organs such as the skin, the joints, the peripheral nervous system, and the kidneys (103). Hepatitis C virus (HCV) disease is the main cause of mixed cryoglobulinemia. In HCV-positive patients, renal involvement accounts for about 30–40% of all cases (104). Clinical symptoms are weakness, arthralgias, and purpura, followed by a nephritic/nephrotic syndrome and rapidly deteriorating kidney function (104, 105). Kidney histology is characterized by mesangial and endocapillary proliferation, extracellular matrix expansion, diffuse leukocyte and monocyte infiltration, double contouring of the GBM, and the presence of intraluminal PAS-positive thrombi. On electron microscopy, electron-dense deposits (cryo-immunocomplexes) can be detected in subendothelial and mesangial regions (104, 106). The diagnosis is based on specific laboratory findings (detection of serum cryoglobulins and serologic hepatitis C markers) combined with the clinical signs and symptoms (104). In this scenario, KDIGO guidelines suggest the use of TPE combined with immunosuppressive treatment, such as RTX (375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks) or CYC (2 mg/kg/day for 2–4 months), combined with intravenous methylprednisolone (0.5/1 g/kg/day for three consecutive days followed by oral prednisone). Importantly, concomitant antiviral therapy should be performed in HCV-positive patients (3133).

Glomerulonephritis Manifesting With Nephrotic Syndrome

Several forms of glomerulonephritis are associated with a nephrotic syndrome, characterized by heavy proteinuria, severe hypoalbuminemia, edema, weight gain due to fluid retention, and dyslipidemia. Membranous nephropathy is the main cause of nephrotic syndrome in adults (107); in addition, diabetic nephropathy, minimal change disease, focal-segmental glomerulosclerosis, SLE, and amyloidosis usually manifest with nephrotic syndrome. AKI episodes have been in rare cases described as a potential complication of nephrotic syndrome, independently of the underlying pathogenesis (108, 109). The AKI pathogenesis in this setting is multifactorial. Some clinical observations supported the hypothesis that the massive urinary albumin loss induces microvascular injury due to volume depletion (109), leading to a massive expression of endothelin 1, inducing a decrease in blood flow and GFR (110). In addition, ischemic tubular damage and cell necrosis have been reported in some cases. Recent studies have shown that some urine biomarkers (NGAL and alpha 1-microglobulin) are elevated in patients with AKI and nephrotic syndrome (111). Although the pathogenesis still needs to be clarified, AKI in NS is generally reversible. The majority of patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome have a complete recovery of kidney function after volume depletion correction. Severe hypoalbuminemia, older age, and male sex are risk factors (109).

Scleroderma

Scleroderma is an autoimmune systemic disorder characterized by uncontrolled expansion of connective tissue in skins and other visceral organs. Kidney involvement is usually characterized by the presence of low-grade proteinuria, but AKI episodes can occur (112, 113). The so-called scleroderma renal crisis is a life-threatening complication of scleroderma and typically presents with the abrupt onset of hypertension and rapid progressive renal insufficiency, followed by encephalopathy, heart failure, and signs and symptoms of TMA (113, 114). The typical histological features are ischemic glomerular changes, malignant hypertension lesions, and TMA in small interlobular and arcuate arteries: glomeruli may show ischemic collapse and fibrin thrombi; various degrees of tubular atrophy and interstitial fibrosis have also been reported (115). Clinical presentation, along with the detection of speckled ANA (positive in 90% of cases) and anti-topoisomerase I antibodies (scl-70) (positive in 20% of cases), supports the diagnosis (113). Renal biopsy should be performed in patients with atypical presentations (increased serum creatinine in normotensive patients or in the presence of active urine sediment or nephrotic range proteinuria). Activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) is crucial in the pathogenesis of scleroderma renal crisis. Thus, the introduction of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors has substantially improved the prognosis of patients with scleroderma crisis, reducing the mortality associated with scleroderma crisis to <10% (113). Calcium channel blockers and, as third line, diuretics and alpha-blockers could be used as additional therapy if blood pressure control remains suboptimal despite maximum doses of ACE inhibitors (116). In addition, recent evidence suggests a role of complement activation and endothelin-1 in the pathogenesis of scleroderma crisis, thus suggesting the use of C5 inhibitors and endothelin receptor antagonists, particularly in refractory cases. Finally, TPE seems to confer some benefits in patients with scleroderma crisis with evidence of TMA or in patients with ACE inhibitor intolerance (116): a typical course of six TPE over 2–3 weeks followed by 4-weekly treatments is a reasonable therapeutic approach, resulting in long-lasting improvements in symptoms (67).

Conclusions

Several glomerular diseases have been reported to manifest with AKI episodes: early diagnosis is crucial since different conditions have a similar clinical profile but require different, often aggressive, treatment in order to preserve renal function and delay the onset of ESKD. In this scenario, renal biopsy is essential for an accurate diagnosis and to describe the extent of reversible/irreversible renal lesions.

Author Contributions

FPe and ES wrote the manuscript. MR provided histological images. MF, FPi, GS, GC, and LG revised the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Mehta RL, Burdmann EA, Cerdá J, Feehally J, Finkelstein F, García-García G, et al. Recognition and management of acute kidney injury in the International Society of Nephrology 0by25 Global Snapshot: a multinational cross-sectional study. Lancet. (2016) 387:2017–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)30240-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Al-Jaghbeer M, Dealmeida D, Bilderback A, Ambrosino R, Kellum JA. Clinical decision support for In-Hospital AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2018) 29:654–60. 10.1681/ASN.2017070765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hoste EA, Bagshaw SM, Bellomo R, Cely CM, Colman R, Cruz DN, et al. Epidemiology of acute kidney injury in critically ill patients: the multinational AKI-EPI study. Intens Care Med. (2015) 41:1411–23. 10.1007/s00134-015-3934-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Uchino S, Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Doig GS, Morimatsu H, Morgera S, et al. Acute renal failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA. (2005) 294:813–8. 10.1001/jama.294.7.813 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hsu RK, McCulloch CE, Dudley RA, Lo LJ, Hsu CY. Temporal changes in incidence of dialysis-requiring AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2013) 24:37–42. 10.1681/ASN.2012080800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fiaccadori E, Regolisti G, Cademartiri C, Cabassi A, Picetti E, Barbagallo M, et al. Efficacy and safety of a Citrate-based protocol for sustained low-efficiency dialysis in AKI using standard dialysis equipment. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2013) 8:1670–8. 10.2215/CJN.00510113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, Molitoris BA, Ronco C, Warnock DG, et al. Acute Kidney Injury Network: report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. (2007) 11:R31. 10.1186/cc5713 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kellum JA, Lameire N, Aspelin P, Barsoum RS, Burdmann EA, Goldstein SL, et al. Kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) acute kidney injury work group. KDIGO clinical practice guideline for acute kidney injury. Kidney Int Suppl. (2012) 2:1–138. 10.1038/kisup.2012.1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fiorentino M, Castellano G, Kellum JA. Differences in acute kidney injury ascertainment for clinical and preclinical studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2017) 32:1789–805. 10.1093/ndt/gfx002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hsu CY, Chertow GM, McCulloch CE, Fan D, Ordonez JD, Go AS. Nonrecovery of kidney function and death after acute on chronic renal failure. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2009) 4:891–8. 10.2215/CJN.05571008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kistler BM, Khubchandani J, Wiblishauser M, Wilund KR, Sosnoff JJ. Epidemiology of falls and fall-related injuries among middle-aged adults with kidney disease. Int Urol Nephrol. (2019) 51:1613–21. 10.1007/s11255-019-02148-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stasi A, Intini A, Divella C, Franzin R, Montemurno E, Grandaliano G, et al. Emerging role of lipopolysaccharide binding protein insepsis-induced acute kidney injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2017) 32:24–31. 10.1093/ndt/gfw250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Fiorentino M, Grandaliano G, Gesualdo L, Castellano G. Acute kidney injury to chronic kidney disease transition. Cont Nephrol. (2018) 193:45–54. 10.1159/000484962 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fiorentino M, Tohme FA, Wang S, Murugan R, Angus DC, Kellum JA. Long-term survival in patients with septic acute kidney injury is strongly influenced by renal recovery. PLoS ONE. (2018) 13:e0198269. 10.1371/journal.pone.0198269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Moore PK, Hsu RK, Liu KD. Management of acute kidney injury: Core Curriculum 2018. Am J Kidney Dis. (2018) 72:136–48. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lafrance J-P, Miller DR. Acute kidney injury associates with increased long-term mortality. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2010) 21:345–52. 10.1681/ASN.2009060636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coca SG, Yusuf B, Shlipak MG, Garg AX, Parikh CR. Long-term risk of mortality and other adverse outcomes after acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. (2009) 53:961–73. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2008.11.034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Fani F, Regolisti G, Delsante M, Cantaluppi V, Castellano G, Gesualdo L, et al. Recent advances in the pathogenetic mechanisms of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury. J Nephrol. (2018) 31:351–9. 10.1007/s40620-017-0452-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Regolisti G, Maggiore U, Cademartiri C, Belli L, Gherli T, Cabassi A, et al. Renal resistive index by transesophageal and transparietal echo-doppler imaging for the prediction of acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major heart surgery. J Nephrol. (2017) 30:243–53. 10.1007/s40620-016-0289-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thervet É. Insuffisance rénale aiguë d'origine glomérulaire [Acute renal failure of glomerular origin]. Rev Prat. (2018) 68:160–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fiorentino M, Bolignano D, Tesar V, Pisano A, Van Biesen W, D'Arrigo G, et al. Renal biopsy in 2015–From epidemiology to evidence-based indications. Am J Nephrol. (2016) 43:1–19. 10.1159/000444026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Fiorentino M, Bolignano D, Tesar V, Pisano A, Biesen W Van, Tripepi G, et al. Renal biopsy in patients with diabetes: a pooled meta-analysis of 48 studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2017) 32:97–110. 10.1093/ndt/gfw070 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.McAdoo SP, Pusey CD. Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 12:1162–72. 10.2215/CJN.01380217 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Cui Z, Zhao M-H. Advances in human antiglomerular basement membrane disease. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2011) 7:697–705. 10.1038/nrneph.2011.89 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rees AJ, Peters DK, Compston DA, Batchelor JR. Strong association between HLA-DRW2 and antibody-mediated Goodpasture's syndrome. Lancet. (1978) 1:966–8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(78)90252-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Donaghy M, Rees AJ. Cigarette smoking and lung haemorrhage in glomerulonephritis caused by autoantibodies to glomerular basement membrane. Lancet. (1983) 2:1390–3. 10.1016/S0140-6736(83)90923-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Jayne DR, Marshall PD, Jones SJ, Lockwood CM. Autoantibodies to GBM and neutrophil cytoplasm in rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. (1990) 37:965–70. 10.1038/ki.1990.72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Saus J, Wieslander J, Langeveld JP, Quinones S, Hudson BG. Identification of the Goodpasture antigen as the alpha 3(IV) chain of collagen IV. J Biol Chem. (1988) 263:13374–80. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Lahmer T, Heemann U. Anti-glomerular basement membrane antibody disease: a rare autoimmune disorder affecting the kidney and the lung. Autoimmunity Rev. (2012) 12:169–73. 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.04.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.McAdoo SP, Tanna A, Hrušková Z, Holm L, Weiner M, Arulkumaran N, et al. Patients double-seropositive for ANCA and anti-GBM antibodies have varied renal survival, frequency of relapse, and outcomes compared to single-seropositive patients. Kidney Int. (2017) 92:693–702. 10.1016/j.kint.2017.03.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Beck L, Bomback AS, Choi MJ, Holzman LB, Langford C, Mariani LH, et al. KDOQI US commentary on the 2012 KDIGO clinical practice guideline for glomerulonephritis. Am J Kidney Dis. (2013) 62:403–41. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Floege J, Barbour SJ, Cattran DC, Hogan JJ, Nachman PH, Tang SCW, et al. Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 1): conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. (2019) 95:268–80. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.10.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rovin BH, Caster DJ, Cattran DC, Gibson KL, Hogan JJ, Moeller MJ, et al. Management and treatment of glomerular diseases (part 2): conclusions from a Kidney Disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. (2019) 95:281–95. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.11.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lockwood CM, Rees AJ, Pearson TA, Evans DJ, Peters DK, Wilson CB. Immunosuppression and plasma-exchange in the treatment of Goodpasture's syndrome. Lancet. (1976) 1:711–5. 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)93089-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Savige JA, Dowling J, Kincaid-Smith P. Superimposed glomerular immune complexes in anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Am J Kidney Dis. (1989) 14:145–53. 10.1016/S0272-6386(89)80190-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Villacorta J, Diaz-Crespo F, Acevedo M, Cavero T, Guerrero C, Praga M, et al. Renal vasculitis presenting with acute kidney injury. Rheumatol Int. (2017) 37:1035–41. 10.1007/s00296-017-3697-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Semple D, Keogh J, Forni L, Venn R. Clinical review: vasculitis on the intensive care unit–part 1: diagnosis. Crit Care. (2005) 9:92–7. 10.1186/cc2936 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Griffith M, Brett S. The pulmonary physician in critical care * illustrative case 3: pulmonary vasculitis. Thorax. (2003) 58:543–6. 10.1136/thorax.58.6.543 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.van der Woude FJ, Rasmussen N, Lobatto S, Wiik A, Permin H, van Es LA, et al. Autoantibodies against neutrophils and monocytes: tool for diagnosis and marker of disease activity in Wegener's granulomatosis. Lancet. (1985) 1:425–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(85)91147-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Savage CO, Winearls CG, Jones S, Marshall PD, Lockwood CM. Prospective study of radioimmunoassay for antibodies against neutrophil cytoplasm in diagnosis of systemic vasculitis. Lancet. (1987) 1:1389–93. 10.1016/S0140-6736(87)90591-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Falk RJ, Hogan S, Carey TS, Jennette JC. Clinical course of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated glomerulonephritis and systemic vasculitis. The Glomerular Disease Collaborative Network. Ann Int Med. (1990) 113:656–63. 10.7326/0003-4819-113-9-656 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Choi HK, Merkel PA, Walker AM, Niles JL. Drug-associated antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-positive vasculitis: prevalence among patients with high titers of antimyeloperoxidase antibodies. Arthrit Rheumatol. (2000) 43:405–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tse WY, Abadeh S, Jefferis R, Savage CO, Adu D. Neutrophil FcgammaRIIIb allelic polymorphism in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-positive systemic vasculitis. Clin Exp Immunol. (2000) 119:574–7. 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2000.01182.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liu M, Chen X, Sun X, Zhou J, Zhang X, Zhu H, et al. Validation of a differential diagnostic model of diabetic nephropathy and non-diabetic renal diseases and the establishment of a new diagnostic model. J Diabetes. (2014) 6:519–26. 10.1111/1753-0407.12150 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Esnault VL, Testa A, Audrain M, Rogé C, Hamidou M, Barrier JH, et al. Alpha 1-antitrypsin genetic polymorphism in ANCA-positive systemic vasculitis. Kidney Int. (1993) 43:1329–32. 10.1038/ki.1993.186 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Merkel PA, Xie G, Monach PA, Ji X, Ciavatta DJ, Byun J, et al. Identification of functional and expression polymorphisms associated with risk for antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated vasculitis. Arthrit Rheumatol. (2017) 69:1054–66. 10.1002/art.40034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Xiao H, Heeringa P, Hu P, Liu Z, Zhao M, Aratani Y, et al. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies specific for myeloperoxidase cause glomerulonephritis and vasculitis in mice. J Clin Investig. (2002) 110:955–63. 10.1172/JCI0215918 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Falk RJ, Terrell RS, Charles LA, Jennette JC. Anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies induce neutrophils to degranulate and produce oxygen radicals in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (1990) 87:4115–9. 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jennette JC, Xiao H, Falk RJ. Pathogenesis of vascular inflammation by anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2006) 17:1235–42. 10.1681/ASN.2005101048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kallenberg CGM, Heeringa P, Stegeman CA. Mechanisms of Disease: pathogenesis and treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitides. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. (2006) 2:661–70. 10.1038/ncprheum0355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Couser WG, Johnson RJ. What is myeloperoxidase doing in ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis? Kidney Int. (2015) 88:938–40. 10.1038/ki.2015.259 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.O'Sullivan KM, Lo CY, Summers SA, Elgass KD, McMillan PJ, Longano A, et al. Renal participation of myeloperoxidase in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated glomerulonephritis. Kidney Int. (2015) 88:1030–46. 10.1038/ki.2015.202 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.DeRemee RA. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody-associated diseases: a pulmonologist's perspective. Am J Kidney Dis. (1991) 18:180–3. 10.1016/S0272-6386(12)80877-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Savige J, Gillis D, Benson E, Davies D, Esnault V, Falk RJ, et al. International Consensus statement on testing and reporting of Antineutrophil Cytoplasmic Antibodies (ANCA). Am J Clin Pathol. (1999) 111:507–13. 10.1093/ajcp/111.4.507 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Savige J, Davies D, Falk RJ, Jennette JC, Wiik A. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies and associated diseases: a review of the clinical and laboratory features. Kidney Int. (2000) 57:846–62. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.057003846.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Eisenberger U, Fakhouri F, Vanhille P, Beaufils H, Mahr A, Guillevin L, et al. ANCA-negative pauci-immune renal vasculitis: histology and outcome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2005) 20:1392–9. 10.1093/ndt/gfh830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Aasarød K, Bostad L, Hammerstrøm J, Jørstad S, Iversen BM. Renal histopathology and clinical course in 94 patients with Wegener's granulomatosis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2001) 16:953–60. 10.1093/ndt/16.5.953 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Hauer HA, Bajema IM, Hagen EC, Noël L-H, Ferrario F, Waldherr R, et al. Long-term renal injury in ANCA-associated vasculitis: an analysis of 31 patients with follow-up biopsies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2002) 17:587–96. 10.1093/ndt/17.4.587 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Berden AE, Ferrario F, Hagen EC, Jayne DR, Jennette JC, Joh K, et al. Histopathologic classification of ANCA-associated glomerulonephritis. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2010) 21:1628–36. 10.1681/ASN.2010050477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Joh K, Muso E, Shigematsu H, Nose M, Nagata M, Arimura Y, et al. Renal pathology of ANCA-related vasculitis: proposal for standardization of pathological diagnosis in Japan. Clin Exp Nephrol. (2008) 12:277–91. 10.1007/s10157-008-0052-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Monach PA, Warner RL, Tomasson G, Specks U, Stone JH, Ding L, et al. Serum proteins reflecting inflammation, injury and repair as biomarkers of disease activity in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Ann Rheumat Dis. (2013) 72:1342–50. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-201981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ishizaki J, Takemori A, Suemori K, Matsumoto T, Akita Y, Sada K-E, et al. Targeted proteomics reveals promising biomarkers of disease activity and organ involvement in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthrit Res Therapy. (2017) 19:218. 10.1186/s13075-017-1429-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Little MA, Nightingale P, Verburgh CA, Hauser T, De Groot K, Savage C, et al. Early mortality in systemic vasculitis: relative contribution of adverse events and active vasculitis. Ann Rheumat Dis. (2010) 69:1036–43. 10.1136/ard.2009.109389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stone JH, Merkel PA, Spiera R, Seo P, Langford CA, Hoffman GS, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide for ANCA-associated vasculitis. New Engl J Med. (2010) 363:221–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909905 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Jones RB, Tervaert JWC, Hauser T, Luqmani R, Morgan MD, Peh CA, et al. Rituximab versus cyclophosphamide in ANCA-associated renal vasculitis. New Engl J Med. (2010) 363:211–20. 10.1056/NEJMoa0909169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Walters G. Role of therapeutic plasmapheresis in ANCA-associated vasculitis. Pediatr Nephrol. (2016) 31:217–25. 10.1007/s00467-014-3038-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Padmanabhan A, Connelly-Smith L, Aqui N, Balogun RA, Klingel R, Meyer E, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice - evidence-based approach from the writing committee of the american society for apheresis: the eighth special issue. J Clin Apheresis. (2019) 34:171–354. 10.1002/jca.21705 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hruskova Z, Stel VS, Jayne D, Aasarød K, De Meester J, Ekstrand A, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (Wegener) and Microscopic polyangiitis requiring renal replacement therapy: results from the European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association Registry. Am J Kidney Dis. (2015) 66:613–20. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2015.03.025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Castellano G, Cafiero C, Divella C, Sallustio F, Gigante M, Pontrelli P, et al. Local synthesis of interferon-alpha in lupus nephritis is associated with type I interferons signature and LMP7 induction in renal tubular epithelial cells. Arthrit Res Therapy. (2015) 17:72. 10.1186/s13075-015-0588-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Almaani S, Meara A, Rovin BH. Update on lupus nephritis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2017) 12:825–35. 10.2215/CJN.05780616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Chan TM. Treatment of severe lupus nephritis: the new horizon. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2015) 11:46–61. 10.1038/nrneph.2014.215 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mok CC. Towards new avenues in the management of lupus glomerulonephritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. (2016) 12:221–34. 10.1038/nrrheum.2015.174 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Wilhelmus S, Bajema IM, Bertsias GK, Boumpas DT, Gordon C, Lightstone L, et al. Lupus nephritis management guidelines compared. Nephroogyl Dial Transplanat. (2016) 31:904–13. 10.1093/ndt/gfv102 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Dooley MA, Jayne D, Ginzler EM, Isenberg D, Olsen NJ, Wofsy D, et al. Mycophenolate versus azathioprine as maintenance therapy for lupus nephritis. New Engl J Med. (2011) 365:1886–95. 10.1056/NEJMoa1014460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Houssiau FA, D'Cruz D, Sangle S, Remy P, Vasconcelos C, Petrovic R, et al. Azathioprine versus mycophenolate mofetil for long-term immunosuppression in lupus nephritis: results from the MAINTAIN Nephritis Trial. Ann Rheumat Dis. (2010) 69:2083–9. 10.1136/ard.2010.131995 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wyatt RJ, Julian BA. IgA nephropathy. New Engl J Med. (2013) 368:2402–14. 10.1056/NEJMra1206793 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Roberts ISD, Cook HT, Troyanov S, Alpers CE, Amore A, Barratt J, et al. The Oxford classification of IgA nephropathy: pathology definitions, correlations, and reproducibility. Kidney Int. (2009) 76:546–56. 10.1038/ki.2009.168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lv J, Yang Y, Zhang H, Chen W, Pan X, Guo Z, et al. Prediction of outcomes in crescentic IgA nephropathy in a multicenter cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2013) 24:2118–25. 10.1681/ASN.2012101017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Saglimbene VM, Craig JC, Vecchio M, et al. Immunosuppressive agents for treating IgA nephropathy. Cochr Database Syst Rev. (2020) CD003965. 10.1002/14651858.CD003965.pub3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rauen T, Eitner F, Fitzner C, Sommerer C, Zeier M, Otte B, et al. Intensive supportive care plus immunosuppression in IgA nephropathy. New Engl J Med. (2015) 373:2225–36. 10.1056/NEJMoa1415463 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Schulman G, Berl T, Beck GJ, Remuzzi G, Ritz E, Shimizu M, et al. Risk factors for progression of chronic kidney disease in the EPPIC trials and the effect of AST-120. Clin Exp Nephrol. (2018) 22:299–308. 10.1007/s10157-017-1447-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rubio-Navarro A, Sanchez-Niño MD, Guerrero-Hue M, García-Caballero C, Gutiérrez E, Yuste C, et al. Podocytes are new cellular targets of haemoglobin-mediated renal damage. J Pathol. (2018) 244:296–310. 10.1002/path.5011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Eison TM, Ault BH, Jones DP, Chesney RW, Wyatt RJ. Post-streptococcal acute glomerulonephritis in children: clinical features and pathogenesis. Pediatr Nephrol. (2011) 26:165–80. 10.1007/s00467-010-1554-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Remuzzi G. HUS and TTP: variable expression of a single entity. Kidney Int. (1987) 32:292–308. 10.1038/ki.1987.206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Noris M, Mescia F, Remuzzi G. STEC-HUS, atypical HUS and TTP are all diseases of complement activation. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2012) 8:622–33. 10.1038/nrneph.2012.195 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Moake JL. Moschcowitz, multimers, and metalloprotease. New Engl J Med. (1998) 339:1629–31. 10.1056/NEJM199811263392210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Eknoyan G, Riggs SA. Renal involvement in patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. Am J Nephrol. (1986) 6:117–31. 10.1159/000167066 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Goodship THJ, Cook HT, Fakhouri F, Fervenza FC, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Kavanagh D, et al. Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference. Kidney Int. (2017) 91:539–51. 10.1016/j.kint.2016.10.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Brocklebank V, Wood KM, Kavanagh D. Thrombotic microangiopathy and the kidney. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2018) 13:300–17. 10.2215/CJN.00620117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bruyand M, Mariani-Kurkdjian P, Gouali M, de Valk H, King LA, Le Hello S, et al. Hemolytic uremic syndrome due to Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infection. Méd Maladies Infect. (2018) 48:167–74. 10.1016/j.medmal.2017.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Giordano M, Castellano G, Messina G, Divella C, Bellantuono R, Puteo F, et al. Preservation of renal function in atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome by Eculizumab: a case report. Pediatrics. (2012) 130:e1385–e8. 10.1542/peds.2011-1685 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Obrig TG. Escherichia coli Shiga toxin mechanisms of action in renal disease. Toxins. (2010) 2:2769–94. 10.3390/toxins2122769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Zipfel PF, Wiech T, Stea ED, Skerka C. CFHR gene variations provide insights in the pathogenesis of the kidney diseases atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome and C3 glomerulopathy. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2020) 31:241–56. 10.1681/ASN.2019050515 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Loconsole D, Giordano M, Laforgia N, Torres D, Santangelo L, Carbone V, et al. Case-management protocol for bloody diarrhea as a model to reduce the clinical impact of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli infections. Experience from Southern Italy. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. (2020) 39:539–47. 10.1007/s10096-019-03755-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Corogeanu D, Willmes R, Wolke M, Plum G, Utermöhlen O, Krönke M. Therapeutic concentrations of antibiotics inhibit Shiga toxin release from enterohemorrhagic E. coli O104:H4 from the 2011 German outbreak. BMC Microbiol. (2012) 12:160. 10.1186/1471-2180-12-160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nester CM, Barbour T, de Cordoba SR, Dragon-Durey MA, Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Goodship THJ, et al. Atypical aHUS: state of the art. Mol Immunol. (2015) 67:31–42. 10.1016/j.molimm.2015.03.246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Zipfel PF, Mache C, Müller D, Licht C, Wigger M, Skerka C. DEAP-HUS: deficiency of CFHR plasma proteins and autoantibody-positive form of hemolytic uremic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. (2010) 25:2009–19. 10.1007/s00467-010-1446-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Dragon-Durey M-A, Sethi SK, Bagga A, Blanc C, Blouin J, Ranchin B, et al. Clinical features of anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol. (2010) 21:2180–7. 10.1681/ASN.2010030315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Fremeaux-Bacchi V, Fakhouri F, Garnier A, Bienaimé F, Dragon-Durey M-A, Ngo S, et al. Genetics and outcome of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome: a nationwide French series comparing children and adults. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. (2013) 8:554–62. 10.2215/CJN.04760512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Sinha A, Gulati A, Saini S, Blanc C, Gupta A, Gurjar BS, et al. Prompt plasma exchanges and immunosuppressive treatment improves the outcomes of anti-factor H autoantibody-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome in children. Kidney Int. (2014) 85:1151–60. 10.1038/ki.2013.373 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Bomback AS, Appel GB. Pathogenesis of the C3 glomerulopathies and reclassification of MPGN. Nat Rev Nephrol. (2012) 8:634–42. 10.1038/nrneph.2012.213 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Sethi S, Fervenza FC. Membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis–a new look at an old entity. New Engl J Med. (2012) 366:1119–31. 10.1056/NEJMra1108178 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Terrier B, Cacoub P. Cryoglobulinemia vasculitis: an update. Curr Opin Rheumatol. (2013) 25:10–8. 10.1097/BOR.0b013e32835b15f7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Roccatello D, Saadoun D, Ramos-Casals M, Tzioufas AG, Fervenza FC, Cacoub P, et al. Cryoglobulinaemia. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2018) 4:11. 10.1038/s41572-018-0009-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Spatola L, Generali E, Angelini C, Badalamenti S, Selmi C. HCV-negative mixed cryoglobulinemia and kidney involvement: in-depth review on physiopathological and histological bases. Clin Exp Med. (2018) 18:465–471. 10.1007/s10238-018-0514-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.D'Amico G, Colasanti G, Ferrario F, Sinico RA. Renal involvement in essential mixed cryoglobulinemia. Kidney Int. (1989) 35:1004–1014. 10.1038/ki.1989.84 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Glassock RJ. The pathogenesis of idiopathic membranous nephropathy: a 50-year odyssey. Am J Kidney Dis. (2010) 56:157–67. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2010.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Meyrier A, Niaudet P. Acute kidney injury complicating nephrotic syndrome of minimal change disease. Kidney Int. (2018) 94:861–9. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.04.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Chen T, Lv Y, Lin F, Zhu J. Acute kidney injury in adult idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Renal Fail J. (2011) 33:144–9. 10.3109/0886022X.2011.553301 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Koomans HA. Pathophysiology of acute renal failure in idiopatic nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant. (2001) 16:221–4. 10.1093/ndt/16.2.221 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Fujigaki Y, Tamura Y, Nagura M, Arai S, Ota T, Shibata S, et al. Unique proximal tubular cell injury and the development of acute kidney injury in adult patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome. BMC Nephrol. (2017) 18:339. 10.1186/s12882-017-0756-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Steen VD. Kidney involvement in systemic sclerosis. La Presse Méd. (2014) 43:e305–14. 10.1016/j.lpm.2014.02.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Bose N, Chiesa-Vottero A, Chatterjee S. Scleroderma renal crisis. Semin Arthrit Rheumat. (2015) 44:687–94. 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2014.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Ghossein C, Varga J, Fenves AZ. Recent developments in the classification, evaluation, pathophysiology, and management of Scleroderma renal crisis. Curr Rheumatol Rep. (2016) 18:5. 10.1007/s11926-015-0551-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Guillevin L, Mouthon L. Scleroderma renal crisis. Rheumat Dis Clin N Am. (2015) 41:475–88. 10.1016/j.rdc.2015.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Zanatta E, Polito P, Favaro M, Larosa M, Marson P, Cozzi F, et al. Therapy of scleroderma renal crisis: state of the art. Autoimmun Rev. (2018) 17:882–9. 10.1016/j.autrev.2018.03.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Medicine are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES