Correlates of Adherence in a Home-Based, Self-Managed Exercise Program Tailored to Wheelchair Users with Spinal Cord Injury

Abstract

Study design:

Cross-sectional design.

Objectives:

To examine personal factors, secondary health conditions, and environmental factors as potential correlates of adherence to a 12-week home-based exercise trial in people with spinal cord injury.

Setting:

Home

Methods:

Participants (n=28) were prescribed a set of exercise videos that they were asked to complete three times each week for 12 weeks (36 total sessions). The videos were accessible through a custom-designed mobile application and included movements targeting strength, cardiorespiratory fitness, and balance that were accompanied with music. Watched video minutes were automatically recorded on the web-based platform. At baseline, participants completed self-report questionnaires that measured personal (e.g., age, self-efficacy) and environmental (e.g., barriers) factors and secondary health conditions (e.g., depression). Data were analyzed using quantile (median) regression analysis.

Results:

Race (African American; β = −65.62, p = 0.004), community barriers (β = −9.12, p = 0.026), anxiety (β = −3.84, p = <0.001), depression (β = −1.42, p = 0.038), physical function (β = −1.35, p = 0.048), and self-efficacy (β = −0.61, p = 0.007) were associated with a lower number of exercise video minutes. Pain intensity (β = 2.03, p = 0.032), pain interference (β = 1.84, p = 0.012), and age (β = 1.13, p = 0.013) were associated with a higher number of exercise video minutes. Total variance explained by the model was 77% (pseudo R² = 0.77).

Conclusions:

Factors associated with lower and higher adherence to home-based exercise should guide future research efforts in creating more precision-based approaches for self-managed home exercise.

Introduction

In recent years, internet-based interventions targeting health issues such as nutrition, smoking, physical activity, or multiple health behaviors have become popular [1]. These interventions have several advantages for people with spinal cord injury (SCI) because of their interactive designs, ability to tailor information to individual users, the potential to reach large groups of people with SCI at relatively low cost, and the ease with which users can get involved, that is, people with SCI can use the intervention at home, which is the most convenient place to obtain regular lifestyle health guidance [2]. Other benefits of home-based programs include their low cost (compared to onsite programs), the elimination of travel time, and the ability for individuals to work at a self-selected pace in a comfortable environment [2, 3].

It is well documented that people with SCI engage in lower levels of physical activity compared to groups without disabilities [4, 5]. Systematic reviews have documented that people who use wheelchairs, in particular, experience a plethora of physical activity barriers that span across each level of the socioecological model: intrapersonal (e.g., lack of self-efficacy, fear, pain, or fatigue); interpersonal (e.g., lack of social support, negative attitudes); institutional (e.g., lack of knowledge of individuals within institutions/organizations); community (e.g., lack of accessible features in fitness and recreation venues); and policy (e.g., poor/no transportation systems, lack of funding for exercise programs) [4].

Given the low rate of physical activity participation among people with SCI, new strategies for promoting this important health behavior are critically needed. Technology is a strategy that can play a substantial role in addressing exercise barriers in the delivery of home-based exercise to people with SCI. Advances in information and communication technology (ICT) such as ubiquitous videoconferencing software, mobile phones and their applications, and wearable monitoring devices enhance the ability of health professionals to better disseminate and monitor the implementation of exercise programs in the community [6]. For people with SCI, ICT can enhance the convenience and accessibility of exercise programs [7]. Such technology is relevant since most people with SCI have a computer with access to the Internet [8]. However, to our knowledge, no study has implemented a remotely delivered, self-managed exercise program using an innovative form of adapted exercise, such as movement-to-music (M2M).

M2M consists of routines choregraphed to music that follow a systematic framework to ensure every muscle group is used to progressively improve physical functioning by targeting three fitness components: balance, cardiorespiratory endurance, and strength. The program has demonstrated significant improvements in physical outcomes among people with multiple sclerosis when compared to adapted yoga [9], but the program has not been used in people with SCI. The SUPER-HEALTH project [10], which stands for Scale-Up Project Evaluating Responsiveness to Home Exercise And Lifestyle Tele-Health, is a 48-week ongoing exercise trial assessing the utilization of M2M remotely delivered to various disability groups, including wheelchair users with either a traumatic SCI or non-traumatic SCI (spina bifida).

SUPER-HEALTH was designed to circumvent the majority of barriers confronted by people with SCI. The study did this by promoting home exercise that can be done conveniently at any time of the day; eliminating the need for transportation to engage in exercise; customizing routines to the unique functional needs of the participant; and using music to facilitate enjoyment. While the assumption is that eliminating common barriers to participating in exercise will provide individuals with SCI a stable and consistent pathway to being regularly active, there are no studies that have examined participant adherence to home exercise (i.e., completion of the prescribed exercise volume) in people with SCI. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the potential mediators/moderators of home-based exercise adherence in a group of adults with SCI. We hypothesized that a model of regression for predicting exercise video minutes in this population would include significant predictors for personal factors, secondary health conditions, and environmental factors.

Methods

The intervention protocol was approved by the University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB-160923002) and was registered with ClinicialTrials.gov (#NCT03024320) as a phase III clinical trial. We certify that all applicable institutional and governmental regulations concerning the ethical use of human volunteers were followed during the course of this research. The study design is cross sectional, including data from participants throughout the first 12 weeks. The first 12-week period was chosen because it is the critical phase that determines whether participants will adopt physical activity behavior into their lifestyle.

Study Procedures

Data were obtained from a cohort of 28 people with SCI (traumatic SCI, n=20; spina bifida, n=8) from an ongoing scale-up, hybrid type 1 effectiveness trial. These 28 participants were randomized to receive 12-weeks of intervention (as opposed to a 12-week non-intervention control group). Intervention participants were given a computer tablet that came preinstalled with a custom-designed web application [11]. The application released a new M2M exercise video each week for the participant to use to meet their weekly exercise goal. When a new routine was introduced, the routine was guided by an M2M instructor that provided verbal instruction and explained each movement pattern. The following week, the same routine was guided by an M2M instructor with SCI but with no verbal instruction, and a new guided routine was also delivered. The routines delivered to participants were designed specifically for wheelchair users and choregraphed to music. The M2M videos incorporated ‘public domain’ music to avoid copyright issues. The first week of the intervention included a prescription of 48 minutes of exercise video content, which was progressed up to 112 minutes at week 12. Additionally, the application included health promotion articles. Participants were provided with a tablet stand to position their tablet for an easy view of the videos, as well as a Fitbit charge HR 2/3 to monitor their daily step/push counts (see figure 1). Further intervention details can be found elsewhere [10].

Figure 1.

Picture of person with SCI participating in the home-based exercise intervention using the provided tablet on an adjustable stand.

Participants

Participants were primarily recruited from the Integrating Biology and Bedside (i2B2) database, which included over 400 patients with SCI from the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation outpatient clinics affiliated with a university-based medical rehabilitation center. In addition to the mail-outs, there were multiple methods of recruitment at the rehabilitation clinics. First, passive recruitment involved informational brochures and a study advertisement in the waiting area of the clinics. The second method for clinic-based recruitment involved informing the physicians and physicians’ staff of the study for them to encourage patients to join.

Participants in this study met the following inclusion criteria: 1) traumatic or non-traumatic spinal cord injury, 2) aged 18–70 yrs., and 3) use of wheelchair as primary means of mobility. The study included the following exclusion criteria: 1) accumulating more than 60 minutes of moderate/vigorous physical activity per week; 2) not within working age (18 to 70 yrs. of age); 3) enrolled in a structured exercise program over the past 6 months; 4) unable to use at least one set of extremities to exercise; 5) unable to converse and read English; 6) medically unstable to perform home exercise as determined by their physician; or 7) cognitive impairment that may preclude self-directed daily activities.

Measures

Questionnaires were automatically emailed to participants at baseline by the REDCap system. Data for the present study were categorized into personal factors, secondary health conditions, and environmental factors. Personal factors included disability type (spinal cord injury or spina bifida), age in years, sex, race, and physical function measured via the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) short form. Other questionnaires for personal factors supported constructs of the Social Cognitive Theory and included exercise goal-setting (Exercise Goal-setting Scale) [12], exercise planning (Exercise Planning and Scheduling Scale) [13], outcome expectations for exercise (Multidimensional Outcomes Expectations for Exercise Scale) [12], and exercise self-efficacy (Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale) [14]. Questionnaires for secondary conditions included anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, and pain, which were measured via NIH PROMIS short forms [15]. Lastly, measures on environmental factors included Ability to Participate in Social Roles (NIH PROMIS), barriers (Barriers to Physical Activity Questionnaire for People with Mobility Impairment) [16], and social support (Social Provisions Scale) [17].

Analysis

For the dependent variable, the median number of minutes of exercise video viewed were first calculated for each week then the total median across the 12-week period (adherence). Independent variables included personal factors (disability type, age, sex, race, self-efficacy, self-regulation, outcome expectations, physical functioning), secondary health conditions (anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, pain interference, and pain intensity), and environmental factors (barriers, social support). Descriptive statistics include medians and interquartile ranges of the continuous variables and frequencies and percentages of categorical variables. The dependent variable was positively skewed due to outliers, a few people who spent more than an hour a week watching videos; therefore quantile (median) regression was used to analyze the data. Quantile (median) regression is more robust to outliers, and it does not rely on the assumption about the distribution of the residuals [18]. The model is specified below:

$${\text{Q}}_{0.5}={\beta }_0+{\beta }_{1\text{disability type}}+{\beta }_{2\text{sex}}+{\beta }_{3\text{race}}+{\beta }_{4\text{race}}+{\beta }_{5\text{SCTconstructs}}+{\beta }_{6\text{PROMIS measures }+}{\beta }_{7\text{barriers}}$$

Data were analyzed using Stata 16. Significance level of 0.05 was used in evaluating the statistical tests.

For descriptive purposes, participants were categorized as high adherence, sub-optimal adherence, low adherence, and non-adherence to the 12-week home-based exercise intervention. High adherence was operationally defined as video minutes viewed at or above 80% of what was prescribed (≥ 80%); sub-optimal adherence between 80% and 40%; low adherence between 40% and 20%; and non-adherence at less than 20%.

Results

Recruitment for the study included 460 flyers sent out to people with SCI with 47 responding to the flyers and an additional 18 from other sources (see figure 2). For enrollment, 65 people were screened, 43 people completed baseline, and 28 people were randomized to the exercise intervention (M2M).

Figure 2.

CONSORT diagram of study

Participant Data

There were 19 females and 9 males in the study (table 1). The median age of participants was 44 years with the majority being white while four were African Americans. Participants scored one standard deviation below the mean on PROMIS physical functioning (median=37) and ability to participate in social roles measures (median=42). Their pain (median=54) and fatigue (median=55) scores were a half standard deviation above the mean.

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the sample (N=28)

Variables	Frequency (%) / Median (IQR)a
Personal Factors
Disability type
Traumatic SCI	19 (68%)
Spina Bifida	9 (32%)
Sex
Male	8 (29%)
Female	20 (71%)
Race
White	24 (85%)
African American	4 (15%)
Age	44.00 (30.50 – 54.00)
Exercise goal setting	22.00 (15.50 – 28.00)
Exercise planning and scheduling	26.50 (24.00 – 29.00)
Exercise self-efficacy	87.50 (62.50 – 100.00)
Outcomes expectations	4.27 (3.83 – 4.57)
Physical function	37.20 (29.80 – 44.85)
Secondary Health Conditions
Anxiety	53.20 (43.20 – 57.40)
Depression	50.90 (38.20 – 55.50)
Fatigue	54.60 (46.90 – 59.40)
Sleep disturbance	50.10 (47.90 – 54.30)
Pain interference	54.05 (40.70 – 64.15)
Pain intensity	46.30 (40.20 – 52.10)
Environmental Factors
Social provision scale	82.50 (75.00 – 89.50)
Able to participate in social roles	42.00 (36.10 – 44.50)
Barriers
Intrapersonal	1.94 (1.04 – 3.15)
Interpersonal	0.76 (0 – 1.92)
Organizational	0 (0 – 1.92)
Community	0.35 (0 – 1.09)

^aIQR = Interquartile Range

Correlates of Exercise Video Minutes

Median regression analysis demonstrated that self-efficacy, depression, anxiety, physical functioning, and community barriers had statistically significant negative correlations with average exercise video minutes, whereas age and pain were identified as positive correlates (see table 2). African Americans, relative to Whites, spent less time viewing exercise videos (β=−65.62, p-value=0.004). A one unit increase in the exercise self-efficacy scale (β=−0.6, p-value=0.007) was associated with shorter minutes of video viewed. Similarly, depression (β=−1.4, p-value=0.038), anxiety (β=−3.84, p-value=0.000), physical functioning (β=−1.35, p-value=0.048), and community barriers (β=−9.12, p-value=0.026) were associated with shorter viewed video minutes. In contrast, each additional year in age was associated with longer periods of viewing exercise videos (β=1.1, p-value=0.013). Additionally, higher pain intensity (β=1.89, p-value=0.022) and pain interference (β=1.84, p-value=0.012) scores were associated with longer minutes of video watched. A notable trend included lower video minutes for participants able to participate in social activity (β=−1.84, p-value=0.052).

Table 2.

Median regression of exercise video minutes with personal and environmental factors and secondary health conditions (n=28)

Variables	Coefficients	p-value
Personal Factors
Disability type
Traumatic SCI	ref
Spina Bifida	9.76	0.443
Sex
Male	ref
Female	4.00	0.674
Race
White	Ref
African American	−65.62	0.004c
Age	1.13	0.013b
Physical functioning	−1.35	0.048b
Exercise goal-setting	−1.02	0.188
Exercise planning and scheduling	1.75	0.134
Exercise self-efficacy	−0.61	0.007c
Outcome expectations for exercise	6.01	0.220
Environmental Factors
Social Support	−0.70	0.221
Able to participate in social activities	−1.84	0.052a
Barriers
Intrapersonal	0.49	0.861
Interpersonal	−3.47	0.354
Organizational	0.95	0.609
Community	−9.12	0.026b
Secondary Health Conditions
Anxiety	−3.84	0.000c
Depression	−1.42	0.038b
Fatigue	−0.35	0.513
Sleep disturbance	−1.80	0.111
Pain interference	1.84	0.012b
Pain intensity	1.89	0.022b

^ap <0.1;

^bp < 0.05;

^cp < 0.01;

Psuedo-R² = 0.77;

Descriptive Adherence

Regarding adherence (number of minutes of exercise performed weekly), the median minutes of exercise videos watched per week for the 12-week period was 21 minutes (figure 3). Median minutes of exercise video prescribed across the 12-week intervention was 93 minutes. For the adherence groups, 2 people (7%) were classified as high adherence (>74 minutes), 7 as sub-optimal adherence (25%; 37–74 minutes), 5 as low adherence (18%; 18–37 minutes), and 14 as non-adherence (50%; <18 minutes).

Figure 3.

Average minutes of exercise video viewed for the 12-week period

Discussion

This is the first study to examine predictors of adherence to a self-managed and home-based exercise program using rhythmic movement patterns to music. The M2M program incorporated telehealth technology to bypass common barriers to exercise, such as lack of transportation and access to knowledgeable staff. Despite removing these barriers, study findings demonstrated that adherence was low and could be predicted by certain demographic, health, functional, and environmental factors.

The current study included potential predictors of physical activity among people with SCI based on those that have been analyzed in previous studies [20, 21]. In agreement with those studies, personal factors accounted for the strongest predictors [21]. In contrast, self-regulatory behaviors (goal setting and planning) were not identified as significant predictors of participation as shown in previous studies [20]. This may have been due to the nature of the intervention, which was home-based, included built-in goals and schedule (e.g., videos delivered weekly 3 times a week), and provided participants with all of the resources needed to perform exercise so their planning was minimized (i.e., exercise videos, tablet, wrist weights).

Another contrasting finding from previous studies was that higher self-efficacy values were correlated with lower exercise minutes. Previous research demonstrated that higher self-efficacy was associated with higher rates of physical activity in people with SCI [20]. However, this may have been due to participants with higher levels of self-efficacy having more opportunities or access to physical activity outside the home, something that could be explored in future research.

Another finding was that community barriers (e.g., accessible facilities, equipment, and cost) were associated with lower exercise minutes. Given that the exercise intervention was focused on eliminating these self-reported barriers, the perceived notion of community barriers among our participants may have had an indirect effect on their level of interest in participating in the home-based exercise program. Lastly, higher scores of pain interference and pain intensity were correlated with more exercise video minutes, which could possibly be interpreted that people who were experiencing pain were more motivated to improve their pain levels by participating in more exercise [22].

Adherence to video minutes was lower than expected across the sample with half of the participants adhering to less than 20 percent of the prescribed video minutes. However, using the physical activity guidelines for people with SCI of 20 minutes of aerobic exercise twice per week [23], one third of our sample met these international guidelines. This is a positive finding given that our target group was not getting any regular exercise and increasing that to 33% of participants obtaining enough minutes of exercise that provides cardiorespiratory benefits is a good starting point upon which to build future research [23].

Not surprisingly, higher scores for anxiety, depression, and physical functioning at baseline were associated with lower exercise video minutes among study participants. An opportunity is being missed when baseline factors such as these are not being used to individualize the intervention (i.e., behavior change techniques, dosing, delivery) in order to improve participant adherence. These findings provide researchers and health professionals with an opportunity to design intervention strategies that are tailored based upon baseline data [24].

Researchers interested in exercise adherence in SCI populations should consider using adaptive intervention designs in home and community-based interventions (e.g., stepped-care designs). These designs can serve as a mechanism for tailoring and ‘titrating’ the intervention based on participant data that are obtained during early intervention stages. Adaptive designs have become popular for targeting low-response behaviors such as smoking cessation and weight loss [25, 26]. Almirall et al. [27] introduced the Sequential Multiple Assignment Randomized Trial (SMART), a type of research design for creating adaptive interventions. These SMART designs help investigators determine when and how to alter treatment variables such as dose, time, and delivery method in order to develop an adaptive intervention [27]. Adaptive intervention designs are also purposed to increase adherence to the intervention by augmenting or switching programs for low- or non-responders.

The SMART design entails a first-stage treatment decision that either compares the length of the first stage or compares the effect of two evidence-based interventions, which can be individualized based on baseline measures associated with adherence (e.g., personal factors, secondary health conditions). A primary tailoring variable (e.g., weeks of first treatment stage) is tested that leads to a second stage treatment decision (i.e., adherence level), which compares an augmentation of the current treatment versus switching to an alternative evidence-based intervention. There is considerable evidence that under the right circumstances and with the appropriate dosing and monitoring, exercise behavior can be modified in cohorts with low and non-participation rates [28]. To our knowledge, these designs have not been utilized in exercise interventions for people with SCI.

There is a clear and pressing need for designing future home-based exercise interventions that have a greater level of customization/tailoring for participants who have low to non-participation rates. With the growing popularity of SMART interventions, use of baseline variables and decision support tools that use algorithmic technology to provide greater customization of exercise interventions to people with SCI may increase their rates of exercise adherence and participation.

Strengths and Limitations

This study analyzed preliminary data from a remotely delivered exercise program aimed at improving access to exercise for people with SCI including spina bifida. There are several limitations that should be considered as part of this study. Given the sample size, the generalizability of the study findings was limited. The sample consisted of people living in the Deep South of the United States, where the study was conducted, and thus, the findings may only apply to people living in similar settings (e.g., limited access to healthcare, high disability prevalence, and high prevalence of chronic disease). Another limitation was the higher percentage of females to males, which differs from the higher incidence of SCI among men [29]. A third limitation was the lack of some potential predictors of participation, such as enjoyment, which is a primary component of M2M but was not part of our regression model.