Skip to main content
Journal of Tropical Pediatrics logoLink to Journal of Tropical Pediatrics
. 2019 Apr 21;65(6):592–602. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmz019

Children Born to Mothers with Rash During Zika Virus Epidemic in Brazil: First 18 Months of Life

Renata Artimos de Oliveira Vianna 1,#, Kathryn Lynn Lovero 2,#, Solange Artimos de Oliveira 1, Alexandre Ribeiro Fernandes 1, Teresa Cristina Sarmet dos Santos 1, Luiz Cláudio Santos de Souza Lima 1, Fabiana Rabe Carvalho 1, Maria Dolores Salgado Quintans 1, Arnaldo Costa Bueno 1, Ana Flávia Malheiros Torbey 1, Aurea Lucia Alves Azevedo Grippa de Souza 1, Armanda de Oliveira Pache de Farias 1, Luiz Antonio Bastos Camacho 3, Lee Woodland Riley 4, Claudete Aparecida Araújo Cardoso 1,
PMCID: PMC7962762  PMID: 31006031

Abstract

Objective

To better understand the clinical spectrum and course of congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) during the first 18 months of life of children whose mothers had rash during pregnancy.

Methods

This longitudinal observational study evaluated the clinical progress from birth until 18 months of life of children of mothers who developed rash during or up to 3 months before gestation. Maternal rash occurred from November 2015 to May 2017. The study subjects were divided into three groups: children whose mothers tested positive by RT-qPCR for Zika virus (ZIKV) (Group 1), children whose mothers tested negative by RT-qPCR for ZIKV (Group 2), and children whose mothers did not undergo any testing for ZIKV (Group 3) but tested negative for other congenital infections.

Results

Between April 2016 and July 2018, we studied 108 children: 43 in Group 1, 26 in Group 2 and 39 in Group 3. The majority of children were admitted into the study within 6 months of life. CZS was diagnosed in 26 children, equally distributed in Groups 1 and 3. Of 18 children with microcephaly, 6 were in Group 1 (1 postnatal) and 12 were in Group 3 (5 postnatal). Maternal rash frequency was 10 times higher during the first trimester than in the other trimesters (OR: 10.35; CI 95%: 3.52–30.41). CZS was diagnosed during the follow-up period in 14 (54%) cases. Developmental delays and motor abnormalities occurred in all children and persisted up to 18 months. Epilepsy occurred in 18 (69%) of the cases.

Conclusions

Infants born of mothers exposed to ZIKV during pregnancy showed progression of developmental, motor and neurologic abnormalities even if they were born asymptomatic. Continued postnatal monitoring of such newborns is necessary to preclude disability-associated complications.

Keywords: Zika virus, Congenital Zika syndrome, microcephaly, RT-PCR

INTRODUCTION

Zika virus (ZIKV) infection, previously considered a mild febrile rash illness, took another form of clinical manifestation in Brazil that led the World Health Organization (WHO) to declare it a public health emergency of international concern in 2016 [1]. The epidemic of ZIKV infection at the beginning of 2015 and the increase in microcephaly notifications at the end of the same year in Brazil alerted health professionals to better understand the natural history of ZIKV infection. Over time, investigators have found that microcephaly is just one of a variety of neurological and developmental abnormalities associated with in utero ZIKV infection, mainly in the first or early second trimester, collectively referred to as congenital Zika syndrome (CZS) [2–4]. Based on this evidence, the Brazilian Ministry of Health (BMoH) proposed a protocol for diagnosing ZIKV infection, emphasizing not only microcephaly, but other neurological manifestations to monitor potential risk factors for adverse child development during the follow-up period [5].

In April 2016, the Hospital Universitário Antônio Pedro at Universidade Federal Fluminense (HUAP/UFF) began receiving suspected cases of congenital ZIKV infection, along with reports from other regions of Brazil [2, 3, 6–9]. Here, we describe and compare clinical manifestations during the first 18 months of life of 108 children whose mothers had rash during pregnancy.

METHODS

Study design and participants

A longitudinal, observational study was carried out on children whose mothers reported developing rash during pregnancy coinciding with the period of ZIKV Public Health Emergency of National Concern in Brazil (from November, 2015 to May, 2017) [10]. Children born to mothers with rash during pregnancy were referred from Health Units to the pediatric outpatient clinic of the HUAP/UFF, a reference center for suspected ZIKV infection cases in the Niterói area, a city in the Rio de Janeiro metropolitan area with approximately 500000 inhabitants. Children were admitted into the study through July 2018.

Laboratory evidence for ZIKV infection during pregnancy was based on mother’s positive RT-qPCR test results on serum and/or urine samples, done during the BMoH recommended period at the flavivirus reference laboratory of Rio de Janeiro State (LACEN, RJ, Brazil), based on Lanciotti et al. [11]. A RT-qPCR positive test result at any point after maternal rash onset confirmed ZIKV infection; a negative test result excluded ZIKV infection if the blood sample was tested within the first five days of rash and/or the urine sample was tested by the 14th day [5]. Children were classified to belong to a ‘suspected group’, if no laboratory confirmation of ZIKV infection was made but if they tested negative for other congenital infections [5]. Maternal clinical records were used to assess prenatal syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and HIV infection. Serological screening for syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and HIV infection was done by the Liaison XL® equipment as part of routine procedures in the neonatal care clinic or, if lacking neonatal care, was conducted at their first visit to our clinic (Diasorin, Saluggia, Italia). Children with perinatal asphyxia, other etiology of microcephaly or other congenital infectious diseases were excluded from this study, as their outcomes may be similar to those associated with ZIKV exposure in utero.

After a written consent form was signed by children’s legal guardian, the participants were classified into three groups:

  1. Group 1: children whose mothers tested positive for ZIKV by RT-qPCR;

  2. Group 2: children whose mothers tested negative for ZIKV by RT-qPCR;

  3. Group 3: children whose mothers did not receive any laboratory testing for ZIKV.

CZS clinical diagnosis was based on the standard definition proposed by BMoH [5]. Briefly, suspected CZS was defined by the presence of neuroanatomical or neurosensory abnormalities, associated with maternal rash during pregnancy.

Head circumference (HC) data, obtained within 24–48 hours of birth, were collected from maternity hospital records. Microcephaly at birth was defined as HC more than two standard deviations (SD) below the mean for sex and gestational age and severe microcephaly as HC more than three SD [5]. HC was re-measured with a non-stretch Teflon tape at each visit. Head growth analyses were based on intergrowth fetal growth standards and the WHO child growth standards for infants [12, 13].

Clinical evaluations

After their admission, children were evaluated by a pediatrician, pediatric neurologist, ophthalmologist, otolaryngologist, orthopedist and speech therapist. The frequency of the evaluations depended on a child’s disease severity, but usually were trimestral. WHO growth indicators were used to evaluate weight gain in children [12]. Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST-II) was used to evaluate development: language, psychosocial, gross motor and fine/adaptive motor skills [14]. Neurological abnormalities were classified into three stages: (a) mild, when a child had delays based on DDST-II; (b) moderate, when a child had DDST-II delays and motor abnormalities, such as hypertonia or hypotonia, spasticity, dysphagia, dyskinesia or dystonia; and (c) severe, when a child had (a) and (b) plus epilepsy, based on classification of the International League Against Epilepsy [15]. Neurological examination was done every 6 months or earlier, depending on disease severity.

Children underwent at least one neuroimaging test, including cranial ultrasound (CUS), computer tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance (MR). CUS was completed in infants less than 6 months of age; CT scans were done in children referred after 6 months, those who showed alterations in CUS, and those with a severe neurological damage. MR was done to clarify CUS and CT images. Auditory brainstem response (ABR), echocardiogram, and hip radiography were completed to assess auditory, heart, and joint development, respectively. Electroencephalogram was conducted on children with seizures.

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. Categorical variables were expressed as frequencies and compared by chi-squared test, where p < 0.05 was considered significant. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to estimate the association of categorical variables among the study groups. Analyses were performed with Epi Info 2015 version 7.1.5.2 (Centers for Diseases Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA).

The study was approved by the ethics committee of the UFF.

Results

During the study period, 114 children were referred to our hospital (Fig. 1). Six were excluded: two with perinatal asphyxia, two with congenital syphilis, one with listeriosis and one with primary microcephaly. The remaining 108 children were classified into three groups: 43 (40%) whose mother had laboratory-confirmed ZIKV infection (Group 1), 26 (24%) whose mother was excluded for ZIKV infection (Group 2), and 39 (36%) whose mother was suspected to have been infected with ZIKV without a laboratory test (Group 3).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Flowchart of study population.

ZIKV, Zika virus; RT-qPCR, real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Overall, most mothers were less than 30 years old and had at least 9 years of schooling. Thirty-seven percent of families earned one or less Brazilian monthly minimum wage, and 54% were residents of informal human settlements designated by the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics as aglomerados subnormais (AGSN) [16], which were more frequent in Groups 1 and 2 compared to Group 3 (p = 0.008) (Table 1).

Table 1.

Maternal sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the study population

Characteristics Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Total p valuea
(n = 43) (n = 26) (n = 39) (n = 108)
n. (%) n. (%) n. (%) n. (%)
Age group (years) 0.406
 <30 26 (61) 17 (65) 29 (74) 72 (67)
 ≥30 17 (39) 9 (35) 10 (26) 36 (33)
Mean (years)b 27.7 (19–40) 25.7 (17–40) 25.9 (15–43) 26.7
Education (years) 0.642
 ≤9 years 15 (35) 12 (46) 16 (41) 43 (40)
 >9 years 26 (61) 13 (50) 21 (54) 60 (56)
 Unknown 2 (4) 1 (4) 2 (5) 5 (4)
Household monthly income 0.286
 ≤1 MMWc 14 (33) 9 (35) 17 (44) 40 (37)
 >1MMWc 26 (60) 14 (54) 15 (38) 55 (51)
  Unknown 3 (7) 3 (11) 7 (18) 13 (12)
AGSN residenced 0.008
 Yes 28 (65) 17 (65) 13 (33) 58 (54)
 No 12 (28) 8 (31) 22 (56) 42 (39)
 Unknown 3 (7) 1 (4) 4 (10) 8 (7)
Smoking 4 (9) 7 (27) 6 (15) 17 (16) 0.150
Alcohol 3 (7) 5 (19) 8 (21) 16 (15) 0.174
Rash 0.015e
 Before pregnancy 2 (4) 0 4 (10) 6 (6)
 1st trimester 10 (23) 3 (11) 18 (46) 31 (29)
 2nd trimester 22 (52) 15 (58) 12 (31) 49 (45)
 3rd trimester 9 (21) 8 (31) 5 (13) 22 (20)
Fever 14 (32) 11 (42) 18 (46) 43 (40) 0.435
Myalgia 12 (28) 10 (39) 15 (38) 37 (34) 0.527
Arthralgia 25 (58) 13 (50) 21 (54) 59 (55) 0.799
Headache 8 (19) 7 (27) 11 (28) 26 (24) 0.553
Conjunctival hyperemia 10 (23) 8 (31) 5 (13) 23 (21) 0.206
a

Pearson Chi-square test.

b

Mean range.

c

MMW = monthly minimum wage; 1 MMW in Brazil is BRL$880.00, the equivalent of USD$361.26 (based on average USD–BRL exchange rate during the enrollment period of 2016).

d

AGSN = aglomerados subnormais (informal settlements defined by Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics).

e

1st trimester versus other trimesters.

The highest frequency of maternal rash (96%) occurred from November 2015 to May 2016 (Fig. 2). Rash was reported in 31 (29%) of mothers during the first trimester, compared to 49 (45%) in the second trimester, 22 (20%) in the third trimester and six (5.5%) before pregnancy (p = 0.015). The highest frequency of rash in the first trimester of pregnancy occurred among mothers without a laboratory confirmation (46%). Other maternal symptoms of ZIKV infection were similar across groups (Table 1).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Frequency of maternal rash by year and month, and CZS patients’ month of birth.

CZS, congenital Zika syndrome.

Clinical characteristics of children during the first year of life

The majority (70%) of children were recruited before 6 months of age. Median age (in months) at inclusion was 5 (IQR = 1–8), 4 (IQR = 0–7) and 1 (IQR = 0–5), in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Ninety-two percent of the infants were born term.

Twenty-six (24%) of 108 children were diagnosed with CZS; 13 in Group 1 and 13 in Group 3. Group 2 (RT-qPCR negative mothers) did not have CZS newborns. Nineteen (73%) of 26 CZS children were male whereas among non CZS 15% were female (OR: 15.8; CI 95%: 4.9–53.2). Eighteen (58%) of the CZS cases occurred among children of 31 mothers who developed rash in the first trimester compared to 8 (10%) in those whose mother developed rash later (OR: 11.9; CI 95%: 3.9–38.0). CZS was diagnosed at birth in 12 children (46%) and 14 (54%) children were diagnosed during the follow-up period until 10 months of life (Table 2).

Table 2.

Clinical features up to 12 months of children of mothers who developed rash during pregnancy

Clinical features Group 1 RT-qPCR+ Group 2 RT-qPCR- Group 3 No RT-qPCR Total
n = 43 n = 26 n = 39 n = 108
no. (%) no. (%) no. (%) no. (%)
Small for gestational age 5 (12) 5 (19) 4 (10) 14 (13)
CZS 13 (30) 0 13 (33) 26 (24)
Time of diagnosis of CZS (n= 13) (n= 0) (n= 13) (n= 26)
 At birth 5 (38) 0 7 (54) 12 (46)
 Up to 10 months of life 8 (62) 0 6 (46) 14 (54)
Microcephaly 6 (14) 0 12 (31) 18 (16)
Time of diagnosis of microcephaly
 At birtha 8 (19) 1 (4) 7 (18) 16 (15)
 After birth 1 (3) 0 5 (13) 6 (6)
Neurological findings  b (n= 43) (n= 25) (n= 38) (n= 106)
 Normal 27 (62) 24 (96) 22(58) 73 (69)
 Mild 1 (3) 1 (4) 0 2 (2)
 Moderate 10 (23) 0 6 (16) 16 (15)
 Severe 5 (12) 0 10 (26) 15 (14)
Ophthalmologic examination (n= 38) (n= 25) (n= 34) (n=97)
 Optic nerve abnormalitiesc 5 (13) 0 4 (12) 9 (9)
 Choriorretinal abnormalitiesc 5 (13) 0 6 (18) 11 (11)
Orthopedic examination
 Arthrogryposisd 1 (3) 0 7 (18) 8 (7)
 Clubfoot 4 (9) 1 (4) 7 (18) 12 (11)
 Congenital hip dysplasia 1 (3) 0 1(3) 2 (2)
Dysphagiae 13 (30) 0 14 (37) 27 (25)
Low weight for agef 6 (14) 0 4 (10) 10 (9)
Time of maternal rash / CZS children (n=13) (n= 0) (n= 13)
 before pregnancyg 1 (8) 0 0 1 (4)
 1st trimester 7 (54) 0 11 (84) 18 (69)
 2nd trimester 4 (30) 0 1 (8) 5 (19)
 3rd trimester 1 (8) 0 1 (8) 2 (8)
a

HC of three children in Group 1 and one in Group 2 normalized during the follow-up period.

b

Eight CZS children in Group 1 and three in Group 3 had moderate neurological findings. All severe neurological findings were observed in CZS children.

c

Observed in 12 CZS children.

d

Only seen in CZS children.

e

Observed in 11 CZS children of Group 1 and 13 of Group 3.

f

Seven CZS children had low weight for age (<−2 z score; WHO, 2016).

g

Up to 3 months before pregnancy.

CZS, congenital Zika syndrome; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction.

Eighteen (69%) CZS children had microcephaly: six (33%) in Group 1 and 12 (67%) in Group 3. The other eight children did not have microcephaly, but all had abnormalities related to CZS. Sixteen (15%) infants had microcephaly diagnosed at birth (Table 2) and 12 of them had severe microcephaly. During the follow-up, four infants’ HC normalized: three in Group 1 and one in Group 2. None of the children whose HC normalized had other neurologic, radiologic or anatomical abnormalities. Five children in Group 3 and one in Group 1 developed postnatal microcephaly, all with CZS. All HC reclassifications occurred before 10 months of life. At 1 year of follow-up, 12 of the 18 microcephaly confirmed cases were diagnosed at birth and the other six after birth (Table 2).

All CZS children had motor abnormalities and developmental delays. Epilepsy was diagnosed in 16 (61.5%) CZS children with mean onset of 4.4 months (range: 0–10 months). By neurological classification, 11 (42%) CZS children were considered moderate and 15 (58%) severe. Twenty-four (92%) CZS children had dysphagia, three of them needed gastrostomy tube and seven had low weight for age. Ophthalmologic abnormalities (optic nerve hypoplasia, macular scarring, pigmentary retinal mottling or coloboma) were observed in 12 CZS children. Eleven CZS children had clubfoot, eight had arthogryposis and two congenital hip dysplasia (Table 2).

At 12 months, seven (8.5%) of 82 children with no CZS had isolated abnormalities by physical examination that did not fulfill the criteria for CZS (Table 2).

Follow-up until 18 months of age

By 18 months, 91 (84%) of 108 children were evaluated. All CZS children persisted with different levels of developmental delays and motor abnormalities. Two new diagnosis of epilepsy were made in CZS children at 16 and 18 months, totaling 18 cases of epilepsy. Of 26 CZS children, 18 had microcephaly; 15 of them had severe neurological findings and three had moderate manifestations. Two of eight CZS children without microcephaly had severe neurological signs and the other six had moderate findings. Epilepsy was more frequently seen in children with microcephaly (OR: 15; CI 95%: 1.98–113.16). Dysphagia and ophthalmological abnormalities remained unchanged. Two more children with CZS developed low weight for age, totaling nine (35%), all with dysphagia. Two of eight arthrogryposis cases showed clinical improvements after physiotherapy sessions (Table 3).

Table 3.

Clinical features of the study population by 18 months

Clinical features (CZS) Group 1
Group 2 Group 3
Total
n = 39
n = 20 n = 32
n = 91
CZS No CZS No CZS CZS No CZS CZS No CZS
n = 13 (%) n = 26 (%) n = 20 (%) n = 13 (%) n = 19 (%) n = 26 (%) n = 65 (%)
Low weight for agea 4 (31) 1 (4) 0 5 (38) 1 (5) 9 (35) 2 (3)
Neurological Examination
 Normal 0 22 (85) 16 (80) 0 16 (84) 0 54 (83)
 Mild 0 4 (15) 3 (15) 0 1 (5) 0 8 (12)
 Moderate 6 (46) 0 1 (5) 2 (15) 2 (10) 8 (31) 3 (5)
 Severe 7 (54) 0 0 11 (85) 0 18 (69) 0
Dysphagia 11 (85) 1 (4) 0 13 0 24 (92) 1 (2)
Arthrogryposis 1 (8) 0 0 5 (38) 0 6 (23) 0
Ophthalmological abnormalitiesb 6 (46) 0 0 6 (46) 0 12 (46) 0
a

Low weight for age < −2 z score (WHO, 2006).

b

Total of 67 children.

None of 65 children without CZS at 12 months were diagnosed with CZS at 18 months (Table 3). Eleven of them had isolated abnormalities by physical examination that did not fulfill the criteria for CZS (Table 3). The mean of frequency of evaluations was 5 (range: 2–10), with no differences between groups 1, 2 and 3 (p = 0.400).

Complementary tests

Four of 87 ABR examinations showed abnormalities, two of them in CZS children with neurosensorial hearing loss. All 70 echocardiograms were normal, but one CZS child had an interatrial communication.

All children completed at least one neuroimaging test. The most common CT findings in CZS children were: calcifications (77%), predominantly in the transitional area between the cortex and the white matter; cerebral cortex thinning (73%), abnormalities of sulci and/or gyri (69%); and ventriculomegaly (61.5%). Seven (8.5%) of 82 children without CZS had some neuroimaging findings, but all of them were asymptomatic. All MRI done in children without CZS were normal (Table 4).

Table 4.

Neuroimaging findings of the study populationa

Neurimaging findings Group 1
Group 2 Group 3
Total
CUS CZS n = 9 No CZS n = 17 No CZS n = 12 CZS n = 9 No CZS n = 14 CZS n = 18 n (%) No CZS n = 43
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
 Cerebral cortex thinning 2 (22) 0 0 4 (44) 0 6 (33) 0
 Ventriculomegaly 3 (33) 0 0 3 (33) 0 6 (33) 0
 Calcifications 1 (11) 0 0 4 (44.4) 0 5 (28) 0
 Corpus callosum hypoplasia 1 (11) 0 0 0 1 (7.1) 1 (6) 1 (2)
 Subependymal cist 0 1 (5.9) 0 0 1 (7.1) 1 (6) 2 (5)
 Brain stem hypoplasia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Cerebellar hypoplasia 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
 Normal 5 (56) 16 (94.1) 12 (100) 3 (33.3) 12 (85.7) 8 (44) 40 (93)

CT n = 13 n = 25 n = 18 n = 13 n = 16 n = 26 n =59
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

 Calcifications 8 (62) 1 (4) 1 (6) 12 (92) 3 (18.8) 20 (77) 5(9)
 Cerebral córtex thinning 8 (62) 0 0 11 (85) 0 19 (73) 0
 Abnormalities of sulci or gyri 7 (54) 0 0 11 (85) 0 18 (69) 0
 Ventriculomegaly 7 (54) 0 0 9 (69) 0 16 (62) 0
 Corpus collosum hypoplasia 3 (23) 0 0 4 (31) 0 7 (27) 0
 Cerebellar hypoplasia 2 (15) 0 0 2 (15) 0 4 (15) 0
 Brain stem hypoplasia 0 0 0 2 (15) 0 2 (8) 0
 Normal 3 (23) 24 (96) 17 (94) 0 13 (81.2) 3 (12) 54 (92)

MRI n = 11 n = 17 n =2 n = 13 n = 6 n = 24 n = 25
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)

 Cerebral córtex thinning 6 (55) 0 0 12 (92) 0 18 (75) 0
 Ventriculomegaly 6 (55) 0 0 12 (92) 0 18 (75) 0
 Abnormalities of sulci or gyri 6 (55) 0 0 12 (92) 0 18 (75) 0
 Cranial facial disproportion 5 (46) 0 0 11 (85) 0 16 (67) 0
 Calcifications 5 (46) 0 0 10 (77) 0 15 (63) 0
 Corpus callosum hypoplasia 6 (55) 0 0 9 (69) 0 15 (63) 0
 Brain stem hypoplasia 2 (18) 0 0 7 (54) 0 9 (38) 0
 Cerebellar hypoplasia 3 (27) 0 0 4 (31) 0 7(29) 0
 Other 2 (18) 0 0 0 0 2 (4) 0
 Normal 0 17 (100) 2 (100) 1 (8) 6 (100) 1 (8) 25 (100)
a

Some children had more than one neuroimaging test.

CUS, cranial ultrasound; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging.

All included children had negative screening test results for syphilis, toxoplasmosis, rubella, cytomegalovirus and HIV infection.

DISCUSSION

In our study 26 (24%) of 108 children born of mothers with rash during pregnancy were diagnosed with CZS, 69% of whom had microcephaly. We found 12 children diagnosed to have microcephaly at birth and another six developed postnatal microcephaly, emphasizing that children whose mother had rash during pregnancy with confirmed or suspected exposure to ZIKV in utero need to be monitored beyond birth even if they initially do not present with microcephaly. We should also emphasize that 54% of CZS cases were diagnosed during the first year of life. Van der Linden et al. [7] reported that 11 of 13 infants with laboratory evidence of CZS and normal HC at birth developed postnatal microcephaly during the first year of life. Eight CZS children without microcephaly had other clinical and neuroimaging abnormalities, findings also described by other authors [3, 17].

Figure 2 shows that the timing of study cases is consistent with the Zika epidemic period in Brazil, with the incidence of gestational rash reaching a maximum during the rainy season (November 2015–March 2016), followed by a wave of CZV diagnoses a few months later. The rash epidemic correlated more clearly with the distribution of RT-qPCR-positive mothers, but negative and untested mothers were also identified during the same period. The cluster of RT-qPCR-negative mothers without CZS newborns may have resulted from heightened alert to gestational rash during the ZIKV epidemic in Brazil. During this period, the positive predictive value of rash for CZS was 24% at our study site.

Mothers in Group 3 were younger, less educated, had lower income, had more smokers and alcohol users, but differences were not significant except for the lower proportion of residents living in AGSN. Unfavorable sociodemographic conditions might partly explain why women in Group 3 did not undergo laboratory testing for ZIKV. Moreover, they might have not been aware of the pregnancy, especially in the first trimester, did not have medical request for test, did not seek medical care during the rash period or attributed the rash to allergy [18]. Among children of mothers who tested positive or were suspected to have been exposed to ZIKV in utero (presence of rash during pregnancy), 10 (38%) of 26 children with CZS and 31 (63%) of 49 children without CZS were residents of AGSN.

A negative RT-qPCR test in a mother with rash done during the recommended period had 100% predictive value for the absence of CZS in the newborn. These results suggest that, during an epidemic of Zika, efforts need to be made to test with RT-qPCR all pregnant mothers with rash, especially during the first trimester. Otherwise, 67% of ZIKV exposed mothers did not have a child with CZS at 18 months of follow-up. Therefore, children with no CZS signs/symptoms or with nonspecific findings at birth of mothers with rash during pregnancy who tested positive by RT-qPCR should be closely monitored after birth, because clinical abnormalities may appear later.

First trimester maternal rash history occurred in 69% of CZS cases, showing that early occurrence of maternal infection was associated with worst prognosis. In addition, severe neurological presentation and arthrogryposis were also associated with first trimester maternal rash. Meneses et al. [9] described maternal rash during first trimester in 54% of 87 children with CZS. Hoen et al. [19] analyzed ZIKV outbreak in French Territories in the Americas and found that the risk of CZS was 6.9%, 1.2%, and 0.9%, when the infection occurred in the first, second and third trimester, respectively.

In this study, microcephaly was a determining factor for the severity of other neurological manifestations, significantly associated with the higher frequency of epilepsy. Epilepsy occurred in 69% of the CZS children, corroborating other studies, which report similar frequency [20, 21]. All CZS children persisted with developmental delay and motor abnormalities up to 18 months of age, demonstrating the devastating progressive effect on central nervous system. Alves et al. [22], in a study in Pernambuco, observed similar results with severe impairment of neuropsychomotor development of children with microcephaly and CZS during the second year of life, even with supportive therapies.

Ocular lesions occurred in 46% of CZS cases and remained unchanged during follow-up. Similar results were observed by Zin et al. [23]. These authors also described ocular abnormalities in children without CZS, which was not found in our study. High frequency (92%) of persistent dysphagia, compromised weight gain and low weight for age were seen during the follow-up. Similar results were reported by França et al. [24] that observed an insufficient weight gain in CZS children with microcephaly by 20 months of age compared to children without CZS at the same age.

No new CZS cases were detected in Groups 1 and 3 during the follow-up at 18 months of life. Children without CZS did not have clinical features or neuroimaging abnormalities. However, as clinical spectrum and long-term impact of ZIKV infection are not totally understood, longitudinal studies are important, especially for children with early mild CZS manifestations.

This study has limitations. Adherence to all examinations and appointments was made difficult by the low socioeconomic status of the majority of families involved. Additionally, as ZIKV infection is thought to be symptomatic in 27%–50% of cases [25], we were unable to evaluate all children exposed to ZIKV in utero, and thus we cannot draw conclusions on precise incidence of CZS outcomes associated with in utero ZIKV exposure. Information about maternal dengue fever or Chikungunya infection, which may have signs and symptoms similar to those of Zika and share the same vector and seasonal distribution, was not routinely collected in prenatal care; thus, we were unable to evaluate in utero exposure to other flaviviruses. In our study, pregnant mothers who were not tested by RT-qPCR and developed rash during the first trimester, were more likely to have children with CZS than those who were tested. The former group of mothers was identified only after their children were diagnosed with CZS and hence this observation is biased. Untested mothers who developed rash during the first trimester who did not give birth to a child with CZS would not have entered the study. Because children were seen at a referral center, there is likely a selection bias, with the more severely affected children being referred. Thus, these findings cannot be generalized to all children at risk for Zika exposure. Since the affected children in this study are still young (18 months of age), precise predictions about their future developmental and functional status cannot be made.

While Brazil has ended its state of Zika epidemic as a public health emergency in May of 2017 [10], the large number of children with CZS is only the beginning of another type of epidemic of major national concern. The CZS cumulative cases in Brazil are currently estimated as 3279 [26]. Transmission of ZIKV in the Americas may now have entered a low-endemic pattern, which means that RT-qPCR tests to detect ZIKV infection will have lower positive predictive value. Nevertheless, the test’s negative predictive value should remain high and thus, concentrated efforts at increasing screening mothers, especially those with rash during pregnancy, should be made to monitor future occurrence of CZS in newborns. Recently developed ZIKV-specific serological tests may also play an important role in clinical investigation and surveillance [27].

Infants born of mothers who develop rash during pregnancy need to be monitored beyond birth even if they are born asymptomatic. Early identification of developmental, cognitive, neurologic and motor abnormalities facilitates intervention and supportive care that may slow disability progression or improve quality of life of these children and their families.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank children and their families that participated in the study, Laboratório Multiusuário de Apoio à Pesquisa em Nefrologia e Ciências Médicas/LAMAP, Unidade de Pesquisa Clínica/UPC, and Zika Collaborative Group/UFF.

Funding

This work was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES) – Finance Code 001, and Fulbright Commission and Global Health Equity Scholars Program (Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health), grant number R25 TW009338.

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article to disclose.

References

  • 1.World Health Organization. WHO Director-General Summarizes the Outcome of the Emergency Committee Regarding Clusters of Microcephaly and Guillain-Barré syndrome. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/detail/01-02-2016-who-director-general-summarizes-the-outcome-of-the-emergency-committee-regarding-clusters-of-microcephaly-and-guillain-barr%C3%A9-syndrome (26 October 2018, date last accessed).
  • 2. Araujo  TVB, Rodrigues  LC, Ximenes  RAA, et al.  Association between microcephaly, Zika virus infection, and other risk factors in Brazil: final report of a case-control study. Lancet Infect Dis  2018;18:328–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Brasil  P, Pereira  JP, Moreira  ME, et al.  Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro. N Engl J Med  2016;375:2321–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Moore  CA, Staples  JE, Dobyns  WB, et al.  Characterizing the pattern of anomalies in congenital Zika syndrome for pediatric clinicians. JAMA Pediatr  2017;171:288–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Orientações Integradas de Vigilância e Atenção à Saúde no Âmbito da Emergência de Saúde Pública de Importância Nacional. http://portalarquivos.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2016/dezembro/12/orientacoes-integradas-vigilancia-atencao.pdf (26 October 2018, date last accessed).
  • 6. França  GV, Schuler-Faccini  L, Oliveira  WK, et al.  Congenital zika virus syndrome in Brazil: a case series of the first 1501 livebirths with complete investigation. Lancet  2016;388:891–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Van der Linden  V, Pessoa  A, Dobyns  W, et al.  Description of 13 infants born during October 2015 – January 2016 with congenital Zika Infection without microcephaly at birth- Brazil, 2016. MMWR Morb Wkly Rep  2016;65:1–142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Aragão  M, Holanda  AC, Brainer-Lima  AM, et al.  Nonmicrocephalic infants with congenital Zika syndrome suspected only after neuroimaging evaluation compared with those with microcephaly at birth and postnatally: how large is the Zika virus “Iceberg”?  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol  2017;38:1427–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Meneses  JDA, Ishigami  AC, Mello  LM, et al.  Lessons learned at the epicenter of Brazil's congenital Zika epidemic: evidence from 87 confirmed cases. Clin Infect Dis  2017;64:1302–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Brasil 2017. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Ministério da Saúde declara fim da Emergência Nacional para Zika e Microcefalia. Publicado em 11 de maio de 2017. http://portalms.saude.gov.br/noticias/svs/28348-ministerio-da-saude-declara-fim-da-emergencia-nacional-para-zika-e-microcefalia (26 October 2018, date last accessed).
  • 11. Lanciotti  RS, Kosoy  OL, Laven  JJ, et al.  Genetic and serologic properties of Zika vírus associated with an epidemic, Yap State, Micronesia, 2007. Emerg Infect Dis  2018;14:1232–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.WHO Multicentre Growth Reference Study Group. WHO Child Growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatr Suppl  2006;95:S76–85. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Villar  J, Altman  DG, Purwar  M, et al.  The objectives, design and implementation of the Intergrowth 21st project. BJOG  2013;120:9–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Frankenburg  WK, Dodds  J, Archer  P, et al.  DENVER II: Training Manual. 2nd edn. Denver, USA: Denver Developmental Materials; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Fisher  RS, Acevedo  C, Arzimanoglou  A, et al.  A practical clinical definition of epilepsy. Epilepsia  2014;55:475–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Aglomerados Subnormais Informações Territoriais, 2010. https://ww2.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/imprensa/ppts/00000015164811202013480105748802.pdf (February 2019, date last accessed).
  • 17. Nogueira  ML, Nery Junior  NRR, Estofolete  CF, et al.  Adverse birth outcomes associated with Zika virus exposure during pregnancy in São José do Rio Preto, Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect  2018;24:646–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Snyder  RE, Boone  CE, Cardoso  CAA, et al.  Zika: a scourge in urban slums. PLoS Negl Trop Dis  2017;11:e0005287.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Hoen  B, Schaub  B, Funk  AL, et al.  Pregnancy outcomes after ZIKV infection in French territories in the Americas. N Engl J Med  2018;378:985–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Van der Linden  H, Carvalho  MD, Van der Linden  V, et al.  Epilepsy profile in infants with congenital Zika virus infection. N Engl J Med  2018;379:891–2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Pessoa  A, Van der Linden  V, Yeargin-Allsopp  M, et al.  Motor abnormalities and Epilepsy in infants and children with evidence of congenital Zika virus infection. Pediatrics  2018;141:S167.. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Alves  L, Paredes  CE, Silva  GC, et al.  Neurodevelopment of 24 children born in Brazil with congenital Zika syndrome in 2015: a case series study. BMJ Open  2018;8:e021304.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Zin  AA, Tsui  I, Rossetto  J, et al.  Screening criteria for ophthalmic manifestations of congenital zika virus infection. JAMA Pediartr  2017;171:847–54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. França  TLB, Medeiros  WR, Souza  NL, et al.  Growth and development of children with microcephaly associated with congenital Zika virus syndrome in Brazil. Int J Environ Res Public Health  2018;15. pii:E1990.. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Mitchell  PK, Mier-Y-Teran-Romero  L, Biggerstaff  BJ, et al.  Reassessing Serosurvey-Based Estimates of the Zika Symptomatic Proportion. Am J Epidemiol  2019;188:206–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Boletim Epidemiológico 54. Monitoramento Integrado de Alterações no Crescimento e Desenvolvimento Relacionadas à Infecção pelo Vírus Zika e Outras Etiologias Infecciosas, até a Semana Epidemiológica 45 de 2018. http://portalarquivos2.saude.gov.br/images/pdf/2018/dezembro/14/2018-061.pdf (February 2019, date last accessed).
  • 27. Balmaseda  A, Zambrana  JV, Collado  D, et al.  Comparison of four serological methods and two reverse transcription-PCR assays for diagnosis and surveillance of Zika virus infection. J Clin Microbiol  2018;56:e01785–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Tropical Pediatrics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES