Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Microbiol Methods. 2020 Dec 29;181:106130. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2020.106130

Exploring the value of MALDI-TOF MS for the detection of clonal outbreaks of Burkholderia contaminans

Selali Fiamanya 1,*, Lucía Cipolla 2, Mónica Prieto 2, John Stelling 3,4
PMCID: PMC7962913  NIHMSID: NIHMS1666172  PMID: 33383044

Abstract

Background

Molecular genetics has risen in both output and affordability to become the gold standard in diagnosis, however it is not yet available for most routine clinical microbiology due to cost and the level of skill it requires. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation – time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) approaches may be useful in bridging the gap between low-resolution phenotypic methods and bulky genotypic methods in the goal of epidemiological source-typing of microbes. Burkholderia has been shown to be identifiable at the subspecies level using MALDI-TOF MS. There have not yet been studies assessing the ability of MALDI-TOF MS to source-type Burkholderia contaminans isolates into epidemiologically relevant outbreak clusters.

Methods

55 well-characterised B. contaminans isolates were used to create a panel for analysis of MALDI-TOF MS biomarker peaks and their relation to outbreak strains, location, source, patient, diagnosis and isolate genetics. Unsupervised clustering was performed and classification models were generated using biostatistical analysis software.

Results

B. contaminans spectra derived from MALDI-TOF MS were of sufficiently high resolution to identify 100% of isolates. Unsupervised clustering methods showed poor evidence of spectra clustering by all characteristics measured. Classification algorithms were discriminatory, with Genetic Algorithm models showing 100% recognition capability for all outbreaks, the pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) typeability model, and 96.63% recognition for the location model. A consistent peak at m/z of approximately 6943 was identified in all non-typeable strains but in none of the typeable strains.

Conclusions

MALDI-TOF MS successfully discriminates B. contaminans isolates into clonal, epidemiological clusters, and can recognise isolates non-typeable by PFGE. Further work should investigate this capability, and include peptide studies and genomic sequencing to identify individual proteins or genes responsible for this non-typeablity, particularly at the peak weight identified.

Keywords: MALDI-TOF, Burkholderia, rapid diagnostics, outbreak

1. Introduction

Microbial diagnostics aim to identify the causative bacterial, fungal and parasitic agents of infectious diseases. Usually this is a lengthy process relying on the biochemical profiling of metabolic traits (A. E. Clark et al., 2013). Although molecular genetics has risen in both output and affordability to become the gold standard in diagnosis, it is not yet available for most routine clinical microbiology due to cost and the level of skill it requires (Barco et al., 2013). Matrix assisted laser ionisation/desorption – time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) approaches may be useful in bridging the gap between low-resolution phenotypic methods and bulky genotypic methods with a goal of epidemiological source-typing of microbes.

MALDI-TOF MS is a high-throughput technology which uses the mass to charge ratio (m/z) of molecules as an analytic tool in microbial identification. It can use simple, whole cell samples from colonies grown overnight on culture plates without pre-fractionation, digestion, separation or cleanup (Dieckmann et al., 2008; Wieser et al., 2012). This means that colonies can be sampled a few hours after inoculation of a mixed culture and still provide a successful pure culture identification (Wieser et al., 2012). Since the time it takes to travel to the detector is proportional to the square root of m/z of an ion, particles are separated as they travel and so frequency distributions of detected particles can be plotted based on TOF up to 100kDa, though most identified biomarkers are small proteins or peptides under 20kDa, due to limited sensitivity of TOF analysers above this mass(Gatlin-Bunai et al., 2007; Van Belkum et al., 2012). A separation step such as liquid chromatography is not necessary, allowing the crude protein extractions and even direct whole cell samples to be used for analysis (Van Belkum et al., 2012). The resultant plots, or “spectral fingerprints”, are characteristic of individual bacterial species, and can be compared with standard or private reference libraries of other spectra of medically relevant bacteria. A cultured sample can be prepared, loaded onto a target plate, and have results generated within hours (Wieser et al., 2012). The easy user interface of MALDI-TOF MS systems and their multifunctionality with regards to broad genera of microbes increase their ability to be integrated into laboratory workflows. Stainless steel plates can subsequently be reused following a simple treatment with ethanol, trichloroacetic acid and mechanical cleansing in a matter of minutes, adding to the ease of maintenance and reducing the cost of consumables (Wieser et al., 2012).

MALDI-TOF MS obtains a proteomic view of a strain, allowing for detection below the species level provided by conventional biochemical identification (Hou et al., 2019). Several studies have explored the discriminatory power of MALDI-TOF MS in strain typing below the species level, with variable results, and more investigation needed (Florio et al., 2018; Sandrin et al., 2013). MALDI-TOF MS has been shown to be as or more effective at discriminating Escherichia coli (C. G. Clark et al., 2013; Novais et al., 2014), Shigella (Khot & Fisher, 2013) and Staphylococcus aureus (Böhme et al., 2012; Josten et al., 2013; Wolters et al., 2011) isolates into phenotypic pathotypes and genetically derived clonal complexes at the sub-species level than some biochemical or genetic methods. Further successes include strain typing of beta haemolytic streptococci, Vibrio spp. (Singhal et al., 2015), Bacteroides fragilis (Nagy et al., 2011) and discrimination of various Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars (Dieckmann & Malorny, 2011; Kuhns et al., 2012).

A major clinical utility of higher typing resolution is in the epidemiological tracing of infections caused by clonal bacteria. For example, MALDI-TOF MS has been used in the real-time tracking of a single plasmid which carried carbapenemase genes in a carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriacaea strain responsible for an outbreak (Lau et al., 2014). In another study, MALDI-TOF MS characterised 33 Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak isolates from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) outbreak into two clonal groups in complete concordance with multilocus sequence typing (MLST) results, also associated with the location of patients in the NICU and their residence in the city of the study (Bar-Meir et al., 2020). Development of this capability in MALDI-TOF MS would allow for rapid detection and tracing of bacterial outbreaks in real-time.

Burkholderia contaminans is a relatively newly identified subspecies of the Burkholderia cepacia complex (Bcc) subgroup (Vanlaere et al., 2009). It is a cause of opportunistic infection, particularly relevant to cystic fibrosis patients in Argentina where prevalence is approximately 10% (Martina et al., 2013). The proportion of B. contaminans among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) with Burkholderia isolates (57%) is also uniquely higher in Argentina compared to other Burkholderia species (Martina et al., 2013) (e.g. 37% in Spain (Medina-Pascual et al., 2015)). MALDI-TOF MS has been shown to accurately identify Bcc isolates at the subspecies level (Cipolla et al., 2019; Degand et al., 2008; Fehlberg et al., 2013; Vanlaere et al., 2008) and it can be used to detect biomarker peaks for B. contaminans specifically (Miñán et al., 2009). To our knowledge there have not yet been studies assessing the ability of MALDI-TOF MS to source-type isolates from any Burkholderia isolates into epidemiologically discrete outbreak clusters.

MALDI-TOF MS has the advantage that reference spectra can be created and quality controlled by laboratory personnel to reflect microbes of local interest, and these can be shared between facilities. This is useful for reflecting trends in the community, research interests, and potentially for resistance and outbreak control. Therefore, if MALDI-TOF MS can consistently differentiate below the species level, it could allow for inexpensive, detailed and dynamic epidemiological analysis of clinical and environmental isolates. Real-time clinical diagnosis will be more feasible, leading to faster commencement of appropriate treatment which is vital in cases of drug-resistant bacteria, while focussed epidemiological interventions for outbreak control could also be developed. This could replace simple threshold measures for outbreak detection that are often poorly specific and sensitive, and time consuming and complex genotyping methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), multi-locus sequence typing (MSLT), whole-genome sequencing (WGS)and restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis that are hard to apply at scale and have a significantly higher financial cost (Grundmann et al., 2011). This project therefore sought to determine if MALDI-TOF MS could be used to classify B. contaminans isolates into source-specific epidemiological clusters.

2. Methods

2.1. Data Collection

2.1.1. Strains

Fifty-five strains were obtained with permission from a previous study which characterised circulating B. contaminans strains across Argentina between 2011 and 2014, in collaboration with the Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Infecciosas, the national reference public health laboratory for Argentina, located in Buenos Aires. Eighteen strains belonged to three outbreaks, and there were a further 37 sporadic strains. Strain numbers were as follows: Outbreak 1 (7 isolates); Outbreak 2 (7 isolates); Outbreak 3 (4 isolates). XbaI-enzyme restricted PFGE had previously been performed on all samples. There were 6 PFGE patterns across the 55 strains, with strains from Outbreaks 1 and 2 showing homology, and strains from Outbreak 3 being non-typeable (Table 1). In the sporadic strains from Cordoba, 18/23 (78%) showed the BX3 pattern (Table 2), and all of the Outbreak 1 isolates, also from Cordoba, exhibited this pattern, consistent with the samples from Cordoba being clonal in origin. Each sporadic strain and representatives of each of the outbreak strains had existing main spectral projections (MSPs) – highly characterised reference spectra of individual samples. 11 strains collected serially from five patients (patients A-E) with cystic fibrosis (CF), and one further strain from a patient with CF were used for the patient-level analysis.

Table 1:

Characteristics of included B. contaminans strains collected from Argentinian patients

Unique Identifier Outbreak PFGE Pattern Origin Diagnosis Location Patient
310–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
311–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
312–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
313–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
314–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
315–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
316–12 1 BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
460–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
461–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
462–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
463–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
464–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
465–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
466–12 2 BX1 Blood Other Misiones
632–13 3 NT Blood N/A CABA
634–13 3 NT Blood N/A CABA
635–13 3 NT Blood N/A CABA
636–13 3 NT Blood N/A CABA
231–12 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba A
384–13 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba A
426–13 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba A
476–14 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba A
512–13 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba A
477–14 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba B
545–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood CF Cordoba B
371–14 Sporadic NT Sputum CF Cordoba C
452–14 Sporadic NT Sputum CF Cordoba C
506–13 Sporadic BX4 Sputum CF CABA D
575–13 Sporadic BX4 Sputum N/A CABA D
311–11 Sporadic NT Sputum CF La Pampa E
465–13 Sporadic NT Sputum CF La Pampa E
026–12 Sporadic BX4 Sputum CF BA
154–12 Sporadic BX7 Blood Other Rio Negro
173–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
191–14 Sporadic BX6 Blood Other BA
193–14 Sporadic BX6 Blood Other BA
211–13 Sporadic BX1 Blood Other Cordoba
212–13 Sporadic BX2 Blood N/A Cordoba
265–11 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba
341–12 Sporadic BX3 Blood Other Cordoba
341–14 Sporadic BX7 Sputum CF CABA
351–12 Sporadic NT Sputum CF BA
353–12 Sporadic BX3 Urine Other BA
369–14 Sporadic NT Sputum CF Cordoba
385–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood N/A Cordoba
386–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood N/A Cordoba
421–12 Sporadic BX1 N/A N/A Misiones
423–14 Sporadic NT Sputum CF BA
425–12 Sporadic NT Sputum CF BA
447–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood N/A Cordoba
450–12 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba
472–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood N/A Cordoba
480–14 Sporadic BX3 Sputum CF Cordoba
497–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood N/A Cordoba
546–13 Sporadic BX3 Blood N/A Cordoba

PFGE: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, NT: non-typeable, CF: cystic fibrosis, N/A: not available, BA: Buenos Aires province, CABA: Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires

Table 2:

PFGE typing of the sporadic B. contaminans isolates originating from different territories

Location BX1 BX2 BX3 BX4 BX6 BX7 NT Total

n % n % n % n % n % n % n % n %

BA 0 0% 0 0% 1 14% 1 14% 2 29% 0 0% 3 43% 7 100%

CABA 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 67% 0 0% 1 33% 0 0% 3 100%

Cordoba 1 4% 1 4% 18 78% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 3 13% 23 100%

La Pampa 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 2 100% 2 100%

Misiones 1 100% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100%

Rio Negro 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 1 100% 0 0% 1 100%

Total 2 5% 1 3% 19 51% 3 8% 2 5% 2 5% 8 22% 37 100%

PFGE: pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, NT: non-typeable, N/A: not available, BA: Buenos Aires province, CABA: Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires

2.1.2. Sample Preparation

MSPs were created for the Outbreak strains which did not previously have one recorded. The protocols used are adopted from those suggested by the manufacturer Bruker Daltonik Inc., to ensure maximal compatibility with established Bruker Biotyper workflows. The author was trained by a Bruker representative before commencing the laboratory work. Briefly, bacteria were taken from frozen stock cultures and plated onto Tryptic Soy Agar (TSA) and grown at 37°C overnight. Single colonies from these plates were re-plated on TSA as confluent cultures and left to grow overnight at 37°C. Samples were prepared for MALDI-TOF MS analysis using the Direct, Extended or Extraction Methods a maximum of 24 hours after culturing using the Bruker Extraction Protocol (Bruker, 2020).

2.1.3. Bruker Daltonik Sample Analysis, Data Acquisition and Cleaning

Following this they were placed into the Bruker Microflex instrument (Bruker Daltonik, GmbH, Leipzig, Germany) for analysis. Bruker FlexControl 3.0 software (Bruker Daltonik) was used to collect mass spectra in the range of 2 to 20kD. Data were collected in an automated fashion using random sampling over individual samples to minimize the effects of operator bias. FlexAnalysis software was used after spectra collection to perform smoothing, normalisation, baseline subtraction and peak picking. Following this, null, low signal to noise ratio (S/N) and outlier spectra were discarded after visual inspection. Spectra were then combined to make MSPs.

2.2. Data Analysis

2.2.1. Confirmation of Species-level Discrimination

Isolates were initially tested to confirm the ability of Bruker RealTime Classification (Bruker Daltonik) to correctly classify them at the species level. This is a software feature of the Microflex instrument which identifies isolates by matching test spectra to spectra in Bruker libraries and in user generated Burkholderia libraries. Quality control was assured if all isolates were correctly classified as B. contaminans.

2.2.2. Assessment of Sub-species-level Discrimination

Samples were analysed according to outbreak (1, 2 or 3), location, clinical source, patient diagnosis, PFGE subtype, and patient ID. Due to the small number of isolates, sub-species variables were collapsed into binary variables to improve discriminatory power: outbreaks were tested per outbreak vs all other samples, location was tested as Cordoba vs all other samples, and PFGE subtype was tested as non-typeable vs all others.

2.2.2.1. Principle Component Analysis (PCA)

ClinProTools3.1 was used to generate PCA graphs. PCA condenses the many dependent variables (i.e. mass peaks) of spectra into three axes (Wold et al., 1987). Each principle component (PC) is a linear combination of the original variables, with the first PC representing the combination with the largest amount of variability. The second and third linear combinations are then created and plotted orthogonal to the previous one meaning there is no redundant information. PC plots show the possible variance of samples for each PC, and more similar spectra are expected to cluster in the same three-dimensional space. The results from this analysis were then used to create MSP dendrograms using Bruker BioTyper3.0. Top Hat Baseline correction was employed, as was Savitzky-Golay smoothing and recalibration.

2.2.2.2. Model Generation

ClinProTools3.1 was used to generate isolate classification models, using the spectra generated from all of the study strains. Three algorithms were available for model development: Genetic Algorithm (GA), Supervised Neural Network (SNN) using 3-nearest neighbours and the QuickClassifier (QC). Recognition capability (RC) is the % of correctly classified spectra for a given model, when all spectra used in the generation of the model are used to test it. Cross-validation (CV) gives an estimate of model reliability and how it will behave in the future and was calculated by randomly selecting 80% of samples to calibrate the model and using 20% to test it, with 10 iterations. If generated models indicated >90% discrimination capacity and further isolates were available, external validation was performed to test model reliability with real-world samples. Due to the large number of hypothesis tests being carried out in model generation, the Benjamini & Hochberg p-value adjustment was automatically run by ClinProTools3.1 to overcome the higher risk of type 1 error.

2.2.2.3. Visual Inspection

Spectra were analysed visually in ClinProTools3.1 for peak shifts which may relate to changes in peptide weight due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or base substitutions.

3. Results

3.1. Strains

Clinical, geographic, outbreak-association, and PFGE pattern for the studied strains are summarized in Table 1. Spectral analysis by the Bruker RealTime Classification software confirmed that all isolates had been correctly identified B. contaminans.

3.2. Unsupervised Clustering

3.2.1. Principle Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA plots show the discriminatory capacity of three orthogonally plotted condensed variables derived from the MS spectra of strains included in the model. Visual groupings of spectra separate from other spectra of a different outbreak signify that they are both similar to others within the group (homologous) as well as different to the other outbreak strains. Whilst there is evidence of homology of outbreak strains (red) in Figure 1 and non-CF patients (green) in Figure 5, this is non-discriminatory, as other strains are present overlap the same area of the graph.

Figure 1:

Figure 1:

PCA plots comparing strains from one outbreak with strains from all other outbreaks.

Figure 5:

Figure 5:

Representative typeable and non-typeable spectra. Purple – sample 312–12, Outbreak 1 (PFGE BX3); sample 464–12, Yellow – Outbreak 2 (PFGE BX1); Green – sample 636–13, Outbreak 3 (PFGE non-typeable)

3.2.2. Dendrograms

Statistics from PCA used in dendrogram formation confirm that sub-species-level variables do not cluster together. A composite dendrogram of all variables used in PCA analysis (Figure 7) displays the heterogenous nature of isolate spectra, with little discriminatory clustering of isolates by any given sub-species-level variable.

Figure 7:

Figure 7:

Representative typeable and non-typeable spectra. Purple – sample 312–12, Outbreak 1 (PFGE BX3); sample 464–12, Yellow – Outbreak 2 (PFGE BX1); Green – sample 636–13, Outbreak 3 (PFGE non-typeable)

3.3. Models

3.3.1. Classification models

Table 3 demonstrates the ability of the different classification algorithms to recognise individual strain samples used to develop the algorithm at the sub-species level. Cross validation further verified this by randomly selecting 80% of the strains to calibrate the algorithm and 20% to test it. High scores for cross-validation indicate high internal validity. The GA algorithm consistently recognised samples at the sub-species level, with 100% recognition for typeability, location and outbreak class, and 88% to 100% recognition for cross validation of these classes. SNN performed the worst of the three, generally recognising around half of the strains correctly, while the QC algorithm performed reasonable successfully, consistently recognising over 80% correctly for all models.

Table 3:

Strain recognition using Genetic Algorithm, Supervised Neural Network and Quick Classifier algorithms in five classification models

Class Model Recognition Capability (%) Cross Validation (%)
Typeable GA 100 93
SNN 50 51
QC 90 88
Location GA 97 90
SNN 83 80
QC 82 80
Outbreak 1 GA 100 95
SNN 52 50
QC 83 83
Outbreak 2 GA 100 88
SNN 51 51
QC 86 74
Outbreak 3 GA 100 93
SNN 51 50
QC 81 80

GA: genetic algorithm, SNN: supervised neural network, QC: quick classifier

3.3.2. External validation

A further 25 typeable and non-typeable strains collected from various hospitals in Argentina were used to test the PFGE typeability models. In this case the QC model performed the best, with 100% (95%CI 74% to 100%) sensitivity and 100% (95%CI 75 to 100) specificity on the samples tested (Table 4).

Table 4:

External validation of PFGE typeability classification model using a further 25 non-typeable Argentinian B. contaminans strains

Sensitivity (%) 95% CI Specificity (%) 95% CI
GA 83 52 to 98 100 75 to 100
QC 100 74 to 100 100 75 to 100
SNN 100 74 to 100 0 0 to 25

CI: confidence interval, GA: genetic algorithm, SNN: supervised neural network, QC: quick classifier

3.4. Visual Inspection

Spectra were examined to identify any relevant peaks in the initial set of isolates which may correlate with the ability or inability of a strain to be typed, and whether this correlation held for the external validation strains. One peak at m/z (mass to charge ratio) of approximately 6943 was found to be present in all non-typeable strains and absent in typeable strains (Figure 8).

Fig. 8.

Fig. 8.

Representative typeable and non-typeable spectra. Purple – sample 312–12, Outbreak 1 (PFGE BX3); sample 464–12, Yellow – Outbreak 2 (PFGE BX1); Green – sample 636–13, Outbreak 3 (PFGE non-typeable).

4. Discussion

4.1. Epidemiological classification

Using unsupervised clustering methods, MALDI-TOF MS was unable to discriminate B. contaminans samples into epidemiological outbreak classes. However, using statistical modelling of the isolate spectra, the GA consistently produced models with 97% - 100% recognition capability and over 88% accuracy when cross validated for classification by outbreak, location and PFGE typeability. This provides proof-of-concept for MALDI-TOF MS clonal, epidemiological recognition, with resultant impacts on public health outbreak monitoring, and in particular, tracing pathogen spread across regions.

4.2. Comparability of PFGE and MALDI-TOF MS methods for typeability of B. contaminans isolates

Externally validating the PFGE typeability model with other routinely collected strains showed promise in the distinction of typeable and non-typeable strains using MALDI-TOF MS, with 100% sensitivity and specificity in the QC model. It is unclear why the QC model surpassed the GA model in the external validation. This may be due to a difference in the model, or to so with the representativeness of the samples used for validation. However the success in both models merits further investigation with larger datasets.

The identification of a unique peak for PFGE non-typeable samples is consistent with reports of biomarkers of other phenotypic variants, including drug resistance and virulence, in a range of bacteria (Flores-Treviño et al., 2019; Hrabák et al., 2013; Oviaño & Bou, 2019). Further examination of the peak weight identified at m/z of approximately 6943 may elucidate a peptide, or peptide mutation, which may be responsible for the non-typeability of certain bacterial strains when using XbaI PFGE. We hypothesise this may be due to an interaction between the peptide of interest and the XbaI restriction endonuclease. This supports a larger aim of identifying phenotypic correlates of MALDI-TOF MS-genetic relationships. MALDI-TOF MS spectra have been used to detect discriminatory peaks which could reliably identify outbreak strains of Shiga-toxigenic E. coli. Using liquid chromatography MS and publicly available databases, the proteins underlying these were identified (Christner et al., 2014). As higher resolution studies are being carried out, it is important to tease out the link between peak weights, proteins and the genome, especially at the lower and higher kDa ranges. High quality genetic analysis will allow correlation of e.g. single nucleotide polymorphisms to MALDI-TOF MS spectra. Other possibilities include the detection of lipids and carbohydrates by MALDI-TOF MS systems, rather than proteins only.

4.3. Clonality in Outbreaks

The outbreaks in this study were classed as such due to their increased frequency at particular locations, however this does not guarantee clonality. Genetic analysis of the recA genes of 120 Argentinian B. contaminans strains from 2004–2010 using BOX-PCR revealed 10 patterns. During a particular outbreak, 55% of strains were found to be of the B8 subtype (implying a nosocomial clonal outbreak strain) whilst the other 45% of the same “outbreak” were thought to be circulating from other sources, such as environmental, but spread simultaneously (Martina et al., 2013), indicating the ambiguous nature of epidemiologically defined outbreak clusters.

There can also be significant genetic diversity within B. contaminans strains in the same patient chronically. In one study, over half of infected CF patients had a change in PCR-BOX subtype, and that multiple subtypes were likely coexistent in the same patient, indicating that at the time of infection or outbreak there is high genetic diversity (Martina et al., 2013). This implies that much of the aforementioned environmental diversity may in fact be due to co-colonization by multiple strains, none of which may be associated with outbreak transmission dynamics. A genetic study by Nunyar et al showed the presence of two concurrent phenotypes in the same patient in both blood and sputum, with different virulence factor expression and genomes, with 1433 mutations detected (Nunvar et al., 2016). This correlates with the lack of obvious clustering of our samples when two samples from the same patient were analysed in unsupervised methods.

Further weakening the link between genetic clonality and outbreak is the possibility that outbreak strains are primarily propagated through methods independent to their genetics, such as patient characteristics or healthcare worker behaviours. This is interesting in the context of the non-typeable strains being correctly characterised by MALDI-TOF MS, as this likely does represent a biochemical or genetic trait affecting XbaI restrictase functioning. The performance of the GA outbreak classification models in our study also suggests that the outbreak strains may share elements such as epigenetic factors, environmental factors driving expression of particular phenotypes, or genotype fragments.

4.4. Limitations and Recommendations

One limitation with the data set was the possible confounding of the CF vs non-CF analysis with the blood vs sputum analysis. All patients with CF had samples collected from sputum, whilst only one patient with a collection from blood samples had CF. Furthermore 11 of the 32 blood samples had an unknown disease aetiology. Therefore, excluding them from the analysis of CF vs non-CF may have also had the effect of disproportionately excluding strains taken from blood samples. A detailed analysis of MALDI-TOF MS discriminatory capacity by PFGE profile would also be useful. It would therefore be worthwhile to carry out a similar project using a larger sample size with strains with complete epidemiological data.

Due to time and resource limitations external validation was unable to be performed on all models. It is unclear how the location models would perform if externally validated using other samples from a similar time and place, and further study should include collecting strains form these regions in order to test this. External validation of outbreak strains is only feasible in real-time studies, where an outbreak has been detected and one wants to know whether a new strain is part of this clonal outbreak or an unrelated sporadic strain appearing at the same time.

5. Conclusion

MALDI-TOF MS successfully discriminates B. contaminans isolates into clonal, epidemiological clusters, and can recognise isolates non-typeable by PFGE. Further work should investigate this capability, including peptide studies and genomic sequencing to identify individual proteins or genes responsible for this non-typeability, which may be linked to the spectra peak identified.

Figure 2:

Figure 2:

PCA plot comparing strains collected from patients with CF (red) with patients without CF (green)

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

PCA plot comparing strains collected from patients from Cordoba (red) with strains from all other locations (green)

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Sample dendrogram demonstrating relationships between strains, using PCA residuals PFGE = Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, CF = Cystic Fibrosis, NT = Non-typeable, BA = Buenos Aires province CABA = Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires

Figure 6:

Figure 6:

Sample dendrogram demonstrating relationships between strains, using PCA residuals PFGE = Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis, CF = Cystic Fibrosis, NT = Non-typeable, BA = Buenos Aires province CABA = Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires

Highlights.

  • MALDI-TOF MS can discriminate between individual Bukholderia contaminans outbreak clusters

  • Strains which are non-typeable by genetic methods are identifiable by MALDI-TOF MS

  • MALDI-TOF MS can elucidate proteomic targets to explain genetic typing relationships

6.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)[grant numbers R01GM103525 and U01CA207167], the Oxford University Clinical Academic Graduate School and the Walter Guinness Charitable Trust. The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the funders, which had role in study design, data collection and analysis, or decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Footnotes

7

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicting affiliations or financial or non-financial interests in the subject matter discussed in this manuscript.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

9 References

  1. Bar-Meir M, Berliner E, Kashat L, Zeevi DA, & Assous MV (2020). The utility of MALDI-TOF MS for outbreak investigation in the neonatal intensive care unit. European Journal of Pediatrics, 179(12), 1843–1849. 10.1007/s00431-020-03696-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barco L, Barrucci F, Olsen JE, & Ricci A. (2013). Salmonella source attribution based on microbial subtyping. In International Journal of Food Microbiology (Vol. 163, Issues 2–3, pp. 193–203). Elsevier B.V. 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2013.03.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Böhme K, Morandi S, Cremonesi P, Fernández No IC, Barros-Velázquez J, Castiglioni B, Brasca M, Cañas B, & Calo-Mata P. (2012). Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from Italian dairy products by MALDI-TOF mass fingerprinting. ELECTROPHORESIS, 33(15), 2355–2364. 10.1002/elps.201100480 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bruker. (2020). MALDI Biotyper® Training Movies - Service | Bruker. https://www.bruker.com/service/education-training/training-courses/microbiology-diagnostics-training-courses/maldi-biotyper-training-movies.html [Google Scholar]
  5. Christner M, Trusch M, Rohde H, Kwiatkowski M, Schlüter H, Wolters M, Aepfelbacher M, & Hentschke M. (2014). Rapid MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry strain typing during a large outbreak of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli. PLoS ONE, 9(7). 10.1371/journal.pone.0101924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cipolla L, Rocca F, Armitano RI, Martinez C, Almuzara M, Faccone D, Vay C, & Prieto M. (2019). Development and evaluation of an in-house database for quick identification of Burkholderia contaminans by MALDI-TOF MS. Revista Argentina de Microbiologia, 51(3), 255–258. 10.1016/j.ram.2018.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Clark AE, Kaleta EJ, Arora A, & Wolk DM (2013). Matrix-Assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry: A fundamental shift in the routine practice of clinical microbiology. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26(3), 547–603. 10.1128/CMR.00072-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Clark CG, Kruczkiewicz P, Guan C, McCorrister SJ, Chong P, Wylie J, van Caeseele P, Tabor HA, Snarr P, Gilmour MW, Taboada EN, & Westmacott GR (2013). Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy methods for determination of Escherichia coli pathotypes. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 94(3), 180–191. 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.06.020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Degand N, Carbonnelle E, Dauphin B, Beretti JL, Le Bourgeois M, Sermet-Gaudelus I, Segonds C, Berche P, Nassif X, & Ferroni A. (2008). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of nonfermenting gram-negative bacilli isolated from cystic fibrosis patients. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 46(10), 3361–3367. 10.1128/JCM.00569-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dieckmann R, Helmuth R, Erhard M, & Malorny B. (2008). Rapid classification and identification of salmonellae at the species and subspecies levels by whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 74(24), 7767–7778. 10.1128/AEM.01402-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dieckmann R, & Malorny B. (2011). Rapid screening of epidemiologically important Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovars by whole-cell matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 77(12), 4136–4146. 10.1128/AEM.02418-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Fehlberg LCC, Andrade LHS, Assis DM, Pereira RHV, Gales AC, & Marques EA (2013). Performance of MALDI-ToF MS for species identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex clinical isolates. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 77(2), 126–128. 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2013.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Flores-Treviño S, Garza-González E, Mendoza-Olazarán S, Morfín-Otero R, Camacho-Ortiz A, Rodríguez-Noriega E, Martínez-Meléndez A, & Bocanegra-Ibarias P. (2019). Screening of biomarkers of drug resistance or virulence in ESCAPE pathogens by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Scientific Reports, 9(1). 10.1038/s41598-019-55430-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Florio W, Tavanti A, Barnini S, Ghelardi E, & Lupetti A. (2018). Recent advances and ongoing challenges in the diagnosis of microbial infections by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. In Frontiers in Microbiology (Vol. 9, Issue MAY). Frontiers Media S.A. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01097 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Gatlin-Bunai CL, Cazares LH, Cooke WE, Semmes OJ, & Malyarenko DI (2007). Optimization of MALDI-TOF MS detection for enhanced sensitivity of affinity-captured proteins spanning a 100 kDa mass range. Journal of Proteome Research, 6(11), 4517–4524. 10.1021/pr0703526 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Grundmann H, Klugman KP, Walsh T, Ramon-Pardo P, Sigauque B, Khan W, Laxminarayan R, Heddini A, & Stelling J. (2011). A framework for global surveillance of antibiotic resistance. Drug Resistance Updates, 14(2), 79–87. 10.1016/j.drup.2011.02.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hou TY, Chiang-Ni C, & Teng SH (2019). Current status of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry in clinical microbiology. In Journal of Food and Drug Analysis (Vol. 27, Issue 2, pp. 404–414). Elsevier Taiwan LLC. 10.1016/j.jfda.2019.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Hrabák J, Chudáčová E, & Walová R. (2013) Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDITOF) mass spectrometry for detection of antibiotic resistance mechanisms: From research to routine diagnosis. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 26(1), 103–114. 10.1128/CMR.00058-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Josten M, Reif M, Szekat C, Al-Sabti N, Roemer T, Sparbier K, Kostrzewa M, Rohde H, Sahl HG, & Bierbaum G. (2013). Analysis of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrum of Staphylococcus aureus identifies mutations that allow differentiation of the main clonal lineages. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 51(6), 1809–1817. 10.1128/JCM.00518-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Khot PD, & Fisher MA (2013). Novel approach for differentiating shigella species and escherichia coli by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 51(11), 3711–3716. 10.1128/JCM.01526-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Kuhns M, Zautner AE, Rabsch W, Zimmermann O, Weig M, Bader O, & Groß U. (2012). Rapid Discrimination of Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhi from Other Serovars by MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e40004. 10.1371/journal.pone.0040004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lau AF, Wang H, Weingarten RA, Drake SK, Suffredini AF, Garfield MK, Chen Y, Gucek M, Youn JH, Stock F, Tso H, DeLeo J, Cimino JJ, Frank KM, & Dekker JP (2014). A rapid matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based method for single-plasmid tracking in an outbreak of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 52(8), 2804–2812. 10.1128/JCM.00694-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Martina P, Bettiol M, Vescina C, Montanaro P, Mannino MC, Prieto CI, Vay C, Naumann D, Schmitt J, Yantorno O, Lagares A, & Bosch A. (2013). Genetic diversity of Burkholderia contaminans isolates from cystic fibrosis patients in Argentina. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 51(1), 339–344. 10.1128/JCM.02500-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Medina-Pascual MJ, Valdezate S, Carrasco G, Villalón P, Garrido N, & Saéz-Nieto JA (2015). Increase in isolation of Burkholderia contaminans from Spanish patients with cystic fibrosis. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 21(2), 150–156. 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Miñán A, Bosch A, Lasch P, Stämmler M, Serra DO, Degrossi J, Gatti B, Vay C, D’Aquino M, Yantorno O, & Naumann D. (2009). Rapid identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex species including strains of the novel Taxon K, recovered from cystic fibrosis patients by intact cell MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Analyst, 134(6), 1138–1148. 10.1039/b822669e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Nagy E, Becker S, Sóki J, Urbán E, & Kostrzewa M. (2011). Differentiation of division I (cfiA-negative) and division II (cfiA-positive) Bacteroides fragilis strains by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of-flight mass spectrometry. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 60(11), 1584–1590. 10.1099/jmm.0.031336-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Novais Â, Sousa C, De Dios Caballero J, Fernandez-Olmos A, Lopes J, Ramos H, Coque TM, Cantón R, & Peixe L. (2014). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry as a tool for the discrimination of high-risk Escherichia coli clones from phylogenetic groups B2 (ST131) and D (ST69, ST405, ST393). European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 33(8), 1391–1399. 10.1007/s10096-014-2071-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Nunvar J, Kalferstova L, Bloodworth RAM, Kolar M, Degrossi J, Lubovich S, Cardona ST, & Drevinek P. (2016). Understanding the pathogenicity of Burkholderia contaminans, an emerging pathogen in cystic fibrosis. PLoS ONE, 11(8). 10.1371/journal.pone.0160975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Oviaño M, & Bou G. (2019). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization–time of flight mass spectrometry for the rapid detection of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and beyond. In Clinical Microbiology Reviews (Vol. 32, Issue 1). American Society for Microbiology. 10.1128/CMR.00037-18 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sandrin TR, Goldstein JE, & Schumaker S. (2013). MALDI TOF MS profiling of bacteria at the strain level: A review. In Mass Spectrometry Reviews (Vol. 32, Issue 3, pp. 188–217). Mass Spectrom Rev. 10.1002/mas.21359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Singhal N, Kumar M, Kanaujia PK, & Virdi JS (2015). MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: An emerging technology for microbial identification and diagnosis. In Frontiers in Microbiology (Vol. 6, Issue AUG). Frontiers Research Foundation. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00791 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Van Belkum A, Welker M, Erhard M, & Chatellier S. (2012). Biomedical mass spectrometry in today’s and tomorrow’s clinical microbiology laboratories. In Journal of Clinical Microbiology (Vol. 50, Issue 5, pp. 1513–1517). American Society for Microbiology Journals. 10.1128/JCM.00420-12 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Vanlaere E, Baldwin A, Gevers D, Henry D, De Brandt E, LiPuma JJ, Mahenthiralingam E, Speert DP, Dowson C, & Vandamme P. (2009). Taxon K, a complex within the Burkholderia cepacia complex, comprises at least two novel species, Burkholderia contaminans sp. nov. and Burkholderia lata sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 59(1), 102–111. 10.1099/ijs.0.001123-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Vanlaere E, Sergeant K, Dawyndt P, Kallow W, Erhard M, Sutton H, Dare D, Devreese B, Samyn B, & Vandamme P. (2008). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time-of of-flight mass spectrometry of intact cells allows rapid identification of Burkholderia cepacia complex. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 75(2), 279–286. 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.06.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wieser A, Schneider L, Jung J, & Schubert S. (2012). MALDI-TOF MS in microbiological diagnostics-identification of microorganisms and beyond (mini review). In Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (Vol. 93, Issue 3, pp. 965–974). Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 10.1007/s00253-011-3783-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wold S, Esbensen K, & Geladi P. (1987). Principal component analysis. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2(1), 37–52. 10.1016/0169-7439(87)80084-9 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wolters M, Rohde H, Maier T, Belmar-Campos C, Franke G, Scherpe S, Aepfelbacher M, & Christner M. (2011). MALDI-TOF MS fingerprinting allows for discrimination of major methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus lineages. International Journal of Medical Microbiology, 301(1), 64–68. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2010.06.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES