Skip to main content
Health Research Alliance Author Manuscripts logoLink to Health Research Alliance Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 16.
Published in final edited form as: J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2020 Jun 8;5(3):93–99. doi: 10.1177/2475530320924009

Anticipated and Perceived Stigma Among Patients With Psoriasis

Marilyn T Wan 1, Rebecca L Pearl 2, Zelma C Chiesa Fuxench 1, Junko Takeshita 1,3, Joel M Gelfand 1,3
PMCID: PMC7963348  NIHMSID: NIHMS1625199  PMID: 33733037

Abstract

Background:

Perceived stigma among patients with psoriasis (PWP) is associated with poorer quality of life.

Objective:

To determine the prevalence and predictors of stigmatizing attitudes that PWP expect and experience from others.

Methods:

We conducted a survey using validated outcome measures to assess the extent to which PWP anticipate and perceive stigma from others. Demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained from electronic medical records.

Results:

Patients (n = 106) were 48.11% female, 70.75% white, and had a mean age ± SD of 47.90 ± 16.19 years old. Of all, 25.47% self-reported their psoriasis as severe. Mean physician global assessment score ± SD was 2.98 ± 1.81. Two-thirds (66.98%) of patients reported that, in response to seeing their psoriasis-affected skin, they anticipated others to stereotype them as “contagious.” Linear regression analyses demonstrated that patient-reported severe psoriasis, compared to mild psoriasis, was associated with greater anticipation of negative stereotypes, social avoidance, and perceived stigma from others (P values < .05). Physician-measured body surface area and global assessment scores were not significantly associated with any outcome.

Conclusion:

Prevalence of anticipated and perceived stigma among PWP is high. Our results suggest that objective measures of severity may not identify patients at risk of stigma-related distress. Additional methods, such as directly inquiring about stigmatizing experiences, may be needed.

Keywords: psoriasis, stigma, attitudes, quality of life, medical education

Introduction

Psoriasis is a chronic immune-mediated disease that affects approximately 1% to 3% of the population worldwide.1,2 Similar to other chronic conditions, such as cancer and diabetes, psoriasis can lead to loss of employment, physical and mental disability, and financial hardship resulting in impaired quality of life.37 However, patients with chronic dermatologic diseases carry an additional burden from social stigma due to the visibility of disease. In one study, over 90% of patients with psoriasis reported some level of perceived stigma due to their condition.8

Discrimination and stigma may exacerbate the negative psychological consequences experienced by patients with psoriasis.914 Indeed, psoriasis has a stronger association with mental health outcomes (eg, depression and anxiety) compared to other dermatologic diseases such as acne, atopic dermatitis, and alopecia areata.1519 Identifying patients with psoriasis who may be vulnerable to stigma and its associated health outcomes is essential for improving patient care. There are limited data from the United States reporting the anticipation of stigma among patients with psoriasis. The current study aimed to quantitatively assess the extent to which patients with psoriasis anticipate and perceive stigma from others. Specifically, this study assessed patients’ anticipated stigma (ie, patients’ expectations of how laypersons would respond to seeing their psoriasis lesions); perceived stigma from others (eg, mistreatment from others due to their visible skin disease); engagement in avoidance or escape coping behaviors to prevent stigmatization; and characteristics associated with anticipated, perceived, and avoidance of stigma.

Methods

Patient and Study Design

Patients with psoriasis were recruited from dermatology clinics at the University of Pennsylvania. Patients were consecutively approached at their routine clinic visit and asked to complete a 5-minute survey about “skin and health,” for which they would be compensated with a 1 of 20 chance to win US$50 in a raffle. Participants had to be at least 18 years old with a diagnosis of psoriasis. Interested patients were led to a private room, where they provided informed consent and completed the survey on an electronic tablet. After completing the survey, participants received a written debriefing statement about psoriasis and had the opportunity to ask questions of the study staff. The institutional review board of University of Pennsylvania approved all procedures.

Outcome Measures

Outcome measures were based on scales previously used to study other types of health-related stigma and adapted for psoriasis.2026 Psoriasis subspecialists (J.M.G., J.T., Z.C.F.) were consulted for the development of psoriasis-specific items. To assess anticipated stigma, patients rated how they thought “others” would respond to seeing their own psoriatic lesions. The first outcome measurement was a stereotype endorsement scale,23 which allowed for semantic differential ratings of 11 pairs of adjectives (eg, dirty and clean). Of 5 potential circles (coded 1–5), patients were asked to mark the circle closest to the adjective they believed “others” would use to describe them if they were to see their psoriasis lesions. Item scores were averaged, and higher scores indicated a greater anticipated stereotype endorsement. Anticipated stigma was also assessed with a social distance scale that assessed the extent to which patients thought others would desire to avoid them should they see their lesions (9 items ranging from 1–5, scores were averaged, and higher scores indicated greater anticipated social distance).21 Lastly, anticipated stigma was measured by emotional response items,24 where patients were asked to rate from 1 to 5 the extent to which they thought “others” would feel compassion, pity, disgust, blame, contempt, and curiosity in response to seeing their psoriasis lesions. Item scores were averaged, and higher scores indicated a greater emotional response.

Patients’ perceived stigma (ie, the extent to which patients observed that others avoided them or treated them poorly because of their skin) was assessed with a 6-item validated questionnaire, rated on a 1 to 4 scale, with a higher score indicating greater perceived stigma.27 Patients also reported whether they had ever felt judged by a physician because of their psoriasis.

To measure avoidance of psoriasis-related stigma, patients were asked if they take measures to hide their psoriasis. As a secondary measure, patients ranked, from first to eighth place, their preference for having psoriasis in relation to 7 other stigmatized conditions (obesity, depression, alcoholism, HIV/AIDS, diabetes, facial disfigurement, and missing a limb).26

Patients reported their demographic characteristics, self-reported disease severity in general (mild, moderate, or severe), visibility (scale of 1–7, with a higher score indicating more psoriasis visible), and duration of disease. Additional clinical details from the visit/survey date, such as comorbidities, Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score (the overall score was an average of 3 characteristics (erythema, induration, and scale) on a 6-point scale ranging from 0–5),28 and physician-assessed body surface area affected by psoriasis, were obtained from electronic medical records.

Statistical Analyses

Demographics was summarized with descriptive statistics. In addition to computing continuous mean scores, for ratings of anticipated social distance, stereotype endorsement, and emotional responses, the percentage of participants scoring a 4 or 5 on each item (indicating stronger item endorsement) was computed to create dichotomous measurements. For the perceived stigma rating, the percentage of participants scoring a 3 or 4 on each item (indicating greater perceived stigma) was computed to create dichotomous measurements (in addition to a continuous mean score). Binary questions assessing perceived and avoidance of stigma were reported descriptively. Linear regression was used to test the effects on all outcomes of age, gender, race, education, employment status, income, duration of disease, disease severity, disease visibility, and a diagnosis of psoriatic arthritis.

Results

Participant Characteristics

Consent was obtained from 117 patients, of which 111 completed at least 1 outcome measure. Five patients were excluded for not having a confirmed diagnosis of psoriasis, leaving a total of 106 participants. Demographics and psoriasis-related characteristics are presented in Table 1. Most patients were male (51.89%), white (70.75%), and had a mean age ± SD of 47.90 ± 16.19 years. Approximately one quarter (24.04%) of patients had concomitant psoriatic arthritis and 25.47% of patients self-reported their psoriasis as severe. Mean PGA score ± SD was 2.98 ± 1.81, the average physician-assessed body surface area affected ± SD was 2.78% ± 4.68%, and mean duration of psoriasis ± SD was 18.60 ± 14.27 years.

Table 1.

Participant Characteristics (Mean ±SD or n [%]).

Variable Patients (N = 106)
Age 47.90 ± 16.19
Sex
 Men 55 (51.89%)
 Women 51 (48.11%)
Body mass index (m/kg2) 30.12 (9.99)
Race/ethnicity
 White 75 (70.75%)
 Black/African American 11 (10.38%)
 Asian 14 (13.21%)
 Other 3 (2.83%)
 Hispanic/Latino/a 3 (2.83%)
 Employed 68 (64.15%)
 College-education or higher 92 (86.79%)
 Income of $50 000 or more 80 (75.47%)
Psoriasis characteristics
 Psoriatic arthritis 25 (24.04%)
 Duration of disease 18.60 ± 14.27
History of psoriasis medicationa
 Topicals 32 (30.19%)
 Biologics 40 (37.74%)
 Phototherapy 39 (36.79%)
 Oral systemic 24 (36.79%)
Current psoriasis medicationa
 Topicals 55 (51.89%)
 Biologics 50 (47.17%)
 Phototherapy 24 (22.64%)
 Oral systemic 11 (10.38%)
Self-reported affected areas at time of study examination
 Nails 22 (22.75%)
 Scalp 59 (55.66%)
 Face 32 (30.19%)
 Arms 60 (30.19%)
 Trunk 44 (41.51%)
 Breasts 16 (15.09%)
 Groin 23 (21.70%)
 Genitals 20 (18.87%)
 Legs 75 (70.75%)
 Hands 23 (21.70%)
 Feet 25 (23.58%)
 Self-reported visibility, range 1–7 2.98 (1.81)
Patient self-reported severity (in general)
 Mild 34 (32.08%)
 Moderate 43 (40.57%)
 Severe 27 (25.47%)
 Physician-reported body surface area %, mean (SD) 2.78% (4.68%)
 Physician global assessment, range 0–5, mean (SD) 2.98 (1.81)
Patient adjusts behavior to hide psoriasis
 Yes 49 (46.23%)
 No 38 (35.85%)
 Missing 19 (17.92%)
a

Adds up to more than 100% due to concomitant medications.

Anticipated Stigma

Approximately two-thirds of patients reported that, in response to seeing their psoriasis-affected skin, they anticipated others to stereotype them as “contagious” (66.98%, 95% CI: 57.18%−75.81%) and “unattractive” (66.0%, 95% CI: 56.20%−74.96%; Figure 1). A notable minority of patients also reported anticipation that others would socially avoid them. For example, 17.92% (95% CI: 11.16%−26.57%) of patients thought others would not want to date them, and 16.03% (95% CI:9.6%−24.43%) thought others would avoid shaking hands with them, in response to seeing their psoriasis lesions. About one-third of patients (28.30%, 95% CI: 19.98%−37.88%) thought their psoriasis lesions would elicit negative emotions such as “disgust” from others.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Anticipation of negative stigma from others. The percentages of individuals who “agree” (4) or “strongly agree” (5) are shown. Item scores were averaged, with higher scores indicating that patients had a stronger anticipation of stereotypes (orange), social distance (blue), and emotions (gray) from other people.

Perceived Stigma

The mean score ± SD of the perceived stigma scale was 2.10 ± 0.70 (range 1–3.83). Approximately 39.62% (95% CI:30.25%−49.59%) reported the belief that others “stare at their skin disease” (Figure 2). Perceived stigma correlated significantly with anticipated overall mean scores of social distance (r = 0.51, P < .001) and of stereotype endorsement (r = 0.61, P < .001). A significant portion of patients (20.75%, 95% CI:13.49%−29.72%) reported feeling judged negatively by a physician due to their psoriasis. However, only 2.83% (95% CI:0.59%−8.05%) reported having this experience with a previous dermatologist.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The percentages of individuals reporting general perceived stigma patients’ general perceived stigma (ie, the extent to which patients observed that others avoided them or treated them poorly because of their skin) was assessed with a 6-item validated survey, rated on a 1 to 4 scale, which a higher score indicating more negatively perceived stigma.

Correlates of Anticipated and Perceived Stigma

Linear regression analyses (Table 2) demonstrated that patient-reported generally severe psoriasis, compared to self-reported generally mild psoriasis was associated with greater anticipation of stereotype endorsement (b = 0.32, SE = 0.13, β = 0.47, P < .001), greater anticipation of social distance (b = 0.42, SE = 0.16, β = 0.72, P < .001), and greater perceived stigma (b = 0.23, SE = 0.15, β = 0.36, P = .017 Younger participants, compared to older participants, and participants with income less than $50 000 (vs greater than $50 000) anticipated more stereotyping and reported more perceived stigma from others (P values < .05). Longer duration of disease was also associated with greater anticipation of stereotype endorsement from others (b = 0.23, SE = 0.04, β = 0.09, P = 0.03). Physician-reported psoriasis severity as determined by body surface area affected and Physical Global Assessment score was not associated with any outcome.

Table 2.

Beta Coefficients From Regression Analyses Testing Predictors of Anticipated and Perceived Stigmatizing Attitudes in Patients With Psoriasis.a

Anticipated stereotype endorsement Anticipated social distance Perceived stigma
Age −0.36b −0.06 −0.30c
Female −0.13 −0.05 0.10
Body mass index −0.07 −0.07 0.05
White non-Hispanic/Non-Latino(a) −0.05 −0.07 −0.12
College graduate or higher education 0.16 −0.06 −0.07
Income $50k or more −0.32c −0.07 −0.22d
Employed 0.01 −0.05 −0.02
Patient-reported disease as severe (generally) 0.33b 0.42b 0.23d
Duration of disease (deciles) 0.23d 0.10 0.12
History of biologic use 0.03 0.02 0.26c
a

Continuous variables were centered at their means.

b

P < .001

c

P < .01.

d

P < .05.

Psoriasis severity was reported as perceived severity over the entire time the patient has had psoriasis (mild, moderate, or severe).

Stigma Avoidance

Almost half (42.23%) of patients stated that they take measures to hide their psoriasis in their daily life. Over one-third of patients (35.85%, 95% CI: 26.77%−45.74%) reported that they would prefer having another stigmatizing disease, such as HIV or obesity, as their first choice disease over psoriasis.

Discussion

Stigma is prevalent among patients with psoriasis, as determined by the anticipation of future stigmatizing experiences (ie, social distancing or negative stereotyping), the perception of adverse treatment (ie, perceived stigma), and the extent to which patients avoid or prevent consequences of having a visible stigma.29,30 Two-thirds of patients reported that, in response to seeing their psoriasis-affected skin, others would stereotype them as “contagious.” Approximately 1 in every 3 patients reported that others would experience negative emotions such as “disgust” in response to seeing their psoriatic lesions. Of note, the validated measure of perceived stigma significantly correlated with the measures of stereotype endorsement and social distance that were adapted for the present study. Almost half of the patients reported that they modify their behavior to hide their psoriasis in their daily life (ie, using mechanisms to avoid stressful situations). At least 1 in every 3 patients with psoriasis reported a desire to have another stigmatizing disease over psoriasis. Patient-reported severe psoriasis, compared to mild psoriasis, was associated with greater anticipation of negative stereotypes, social avoidance, and perceived stigma from others (P values < .05). Longer duration of psoriasis was associated with a higher expectation of being negatively stereotyped by others. It is possible that stigmatizing experiences accumulate the longer someone has psoriasis, leading to greater anticipated stigma in the future.

Physician-reported measures of disease severity such as body surface area affected and PGA score were not associated with any outcome. This may be attributed to the cross-sectional nature of the severity measures. However, this finding is consistent with previous literature that reported physician-assessed measures of psoriasis severity correlated poorly with patient-reported quality of life measures.31,32

We note that participants in this study completed the same social distance scale, stereotype semantic scale, emotion ratings, and disease rank list as those completed by a layperson sample in a previous study.9 Patients with psoriasis anticipated more negative emotional responses to their visible lesions and stronger endorsement of negative stereotypes from the public than was reported by actual laypersons.9 Layperson responses may have been biased by social desirability pressures, leading them to underreport their stigmatizing attitudes. However, laypersons reported a greater desire for social distance than expected by patients, and less preference for having psoriasis (compared to other stigmatized diseases) than did patients with psoriasis, suggesting that social desirability bias may not have been strong enough to override genuine responses to seeing psoriasis lesions. Thus, while patients may overestimate some aspects of stigma against them due to their skin disease, they may underestimate the extent to which others may want to avoid them or may think that psoriasis is an undesirable disease. A significant minority of patients with psoriasis and laypersons chose other stigmatizing diseases (eg, HIV or losing a limb; Supplemental Figure 1) over having psoriasis. Altogether, these findings suggest that patients may have heightened anticipated stigma in relation to true layperson attitudes, yet their concerns also have validity with respect to how they are treated by others.

Our findings are similar to previous research that have found sociodemographic factors (eg, younger age) and disease-related variables (eg, longer duration of disease)33 as predictors of anticipated and perceived stigma among patients with psoriasis. Social rejection, as reported by our participants were consistent with previous qualitative34 and quantitative35 studies. Finally, previous studies have shown that patients avoid social situations to avoid experiencing others’ negative reactions in response to their psoriasis lesions. The authors postulated that stress contributed significantly7 to disease impact and, in fact, even greater than the visibility of disease itself.7 Furthermore, the stress resulting from perceived stigma may be a trigger for psoriasis exacerbation,36 and the relationship between stigma and psoriasis flares can become a vicious, perpetual cycle, highlighting the pervasiveness of stigma. Indeed, in studies of weight stigma, anticipated stigma, particularly, has been shown increase markers of cardiovascular reactivity (ie, higher blood pressure) and therefore contribute to cardiovascular disease.37

This study is unique as it is the first to our knowledge to directly assess the extent to which patients expect others to respond to their psoriatic lesions. To our knowledge, this is the largest survey of stigma in US patients with psoriasis. Another strength of this study is that the outcome measures of anticipated social distance and stereotype endorsement correlated with a widely used, validated measure of perceived stigma that was developed for individuals with skin diseases, thus suggesting the validity and utility of the stigma measures that we adapted from other kinds of stigma measures for use in future studies. As with all observational studies, our study may be affected by limitations such as generalizability. It is possible that patients who experience stigma may be more motivated to seek treatment and achieve disease clearance, contributing to higher reports of anticipated and perceived stigma in our sample. Alternatively, previous literature supports an inverse relationship between perceived stigma and the likelihood of seeking treatment.38 Our findings may not be representative of the general psoriatic population as we recruited patients from a single institution. Although we assessed how patients perceive others’ responses to their psoriasis, future studies are needed to assess self-stigma (ie, internalization of stigma), including the degree of agreement with negative stereotypes and the application of these negative societal attitudes to self in order to develop targeted strategies to reduce stigma.39

In conclusion, there is a high prevalence of anticipated and perceived stigma reported by adult patients with psoriasis. Our results suggest that objective measures of disease severity documented in routine clinical care do not reflect a patient’s experience of stigma and that additional methods of accurately screening and monitoring patients for stigmatization are needed to understand the impact of stigma on patients with psoriasis. Future research may investigate the potential benefits of incorporating discussions of anticipated and perceived stigma into routine care visits for patients with psoriasis to improve quality of life.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Figure 1

Funding

The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Supported by a grant from the Edwin and Fannie Gray Hall Center for Human Appearance at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. Supported in part by a grant (P30AR069589-03) from NIH, a grant (K23HL140176) from NIH/NHLBI (RLP), and a medical dermatology fellowship from the National Psoriasis Foundation (MTW).

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr Gelfand served as a consultant for Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Biologics, Novartis Corp, Regeneron, UCB (Data Safety and Monitoring Board), and Sanofi and Pfizer Inc, receiving honoraria. In addition, Dr Gelfand is a copatent holder of resiquimod for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and he is a deputy editor for the Journal of Investigative Dermatology, receiving honoraria from the Society for Investigative Dermatology. Dr Gelfand receives research grants (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis Corp, Sanofi, Celgene, Ortho Dermatologics, and Pfizer Inc, and he has received payment for CME work related to psoriasis that was supported indirectly by Eli Lilly and Company and Ortho Dermatologics. Dr Takeshita receives a research grant from Pfizer Inc (to the Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania) and has received payment for CME work related to psoriasis that was supported indirectly by Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company and Novartis.

Footnotes

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material for this article is available online.

References

  • 1.Kurd SK, Gelfand JM. The prevalence of previously diagnosed and undiagnosed psoriasis in US adults: results from NHANES 2003–2004. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(2):218–224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Griffiths CE, Barker JN. Pathogenesis and clinical features of psoriasis. Lancet. 2007;370(9583):263–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.deKorte J, Mombers F, Bos J, Sprangers M. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis: A systematic literature review. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2004;9(2):140–147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Finlay AY, Coles EC. The effect of severe psoriasis on the quality of life of 369 patients. Br J Dermatol. 1995;132(2):236–244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krueger G, Koo J, Lebwohl M, Menter A, Stern RS, Rolstad T. The impact of psoriasis on quality of life: results of a 1998 National Psoriasis Foundation patient-membership survey. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(3):280–284. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rapp SR, Feldman SR, Exum ML, Fleischer AB Jr, Reboussin DM. Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41(3 Pt 1):401–407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Richards HL, Fortune DG, Griffiths CE, Main CJ. The contribution of perceptions of stigmatisation to disability in patients with psoriasis. J Psychosom Res. 2001;50(1):11–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hrehorow E, Salomon J, Matusiak L, Reich A, Szepietowski JC. Patients with psoriasis feel stigmatized. Acta Derm Venereol. 2012;92(1):67–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pearl RL, Wan MT, Takeshita J, Gelfand JM. Stigmatizing attitudes toward persons with psoriasis among laypersons and medical students. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1556–1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vardy D, Besser A, Amir M, Gesthalter B, Biton A, Buskilas D. Experiences of stigmatization play a role in mediating the impact of disease severity on quality of life in psoriasis patients. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147(4):736–742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Richards H, Fortune D, Griffiths C, Main C. The contribution of perceptions of stigmatisation to disability in patients with psoriasis. J Psychosom Res. 2001;50(1):11–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Schmid-Ott G, Schallmayer S, Calliess I. Quality of life in patients with psoriasis and psoriasis arthritis with a special focus on stigmatization experiences. Clin Dermatol. 2007;25(6): 547–554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ginsburg I, Link B. Psychosocial consequences of rejection and stigma feelings in psoriasis patients. Int J Dermatol. 1993;32(8): 587–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hawro M, Maurer M, Weller K, et al. Lesions on the back of hands and femal gender predispose to stigmatization in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;76(4):648–654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ferreira B, Abreu J, Reis J, Figueiredo A. Psoriasis and associated psychiatric disorders: a systematic review on etiopathogenesis and clinical correlation. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2016;9(6):36–43. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kurd S, Troxel A, Crits-Cristoph P, Gelfand J. The risk of depression, anxiety, and suicidality in patients with psoriasis: a population-based cohort study. Arch Dermatol. 2010; 146(8)891–895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Eckert L, Gupta S, Amand C, Gadkari A, Mahajan P, Gelfand JM. The burden of atopic dermatitis in US adults: health care resource utilization data from the 2013 National Health and Wellness Survey. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(1):54–61 e51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rieder E, Tausk F. Psoriasis, a model of dermatologic psychosomatic disease: psychiatric implications and treatments. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(1):12–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gupta MA, Gupta AK. Depression and suicidal ideation in dermatology patients with acne, alopecia areata, atopic dermatitis and psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(5):846–850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Link BG, Phelan JC, Bresnahan M, Stueve A, Pescosolido BA. Public conceptions of mental illness: labels, causes, dangerousness, and social distance. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(9): 1328–1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Pearl RL, Puhl RM, Brownell KD. Positive media portrayals of obese persons: impact on attitudes and image preferences. Health Psychology. 2012;31(6):821–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Watson D, Clark LA. The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form. University of Iowa; 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bacon JG, Scheltema KE, Robinson BE. Fat phobia scale revisited: the short form. Int J Obesity. 2001;25(2):252–257. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ruttan RL, McDonnell M, Nordgren LF. Having “been there” doesn’t mean I care: when prior experience reduces compassion for emotional distress. J Pers Socl Psychol. 2015;108(4):610–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Allison DB, Basile VC, Yuker HE. The measurement of attitudes toward and beliefs about obese persons. Int J Eat Disord. 1991; 10(5):599–607. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Latner J, Stunkard A. Getting worse: the stigmatization of obese children. Obesity. 2003;11(3):452–456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Schmid-Ott G, Burchard R, Niederauer HH, Lamprecht F, Kunsebeck HW. Stigmatization and quality of life of patients with psoriasis and atopic dermatitis. Hautarzt. 2003;54(9): 852–857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Viswanathan HN, Chau D, Milmont CE, et al. Total skin clearance results in improvements in health-related quality of life and reduced symptom severity among patients with moderate to severe psoriasis. J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26(3):235–239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Corrigan PW, Watson AC. Understanding the impact of stigma on people with mental illness. World Psychiatry. 2002;1(1):16–20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Berger BE, Ferrans CE, Lashley FR. Measuring stigma in people with HIV: psychometric assessment of the HIV stigma scale. Res Nurs Health. 2001;24(6):518–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Alpsoy E, Polat M, FettahlioGlu-Karaman B, et al. Internalized stigma in psoriasis: a multicenter study. J Dermatol. 2017;44(8): 885–891. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Paul C, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Mallbris L, Mamolo C. Do patients and physicians agree in their assessment of the severity of psoriasis? Insights from Tofacitinib phase 3 clinical trials. J Dermatol Clin Res. 2015;3(3):1048. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ginsburg IH, Link BG. Feelings of stigmatization in patients with psoriasis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;20(1):53–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ghorbanibirgani A, Fallahi-Khoshknab M, Zarea K, Abedi H. The lived experience of psoriasis patients from social stigma and rejection: a qualitative study. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2016; 18(7):e27893. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Jobling RG. Psoriasis—a preliminary questionnaire study of sufferers’ subjective experience. Clin Exp Dermatol. 1976;1(3): 233–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rousset L, Halioua B. Stress and psoriasis. Int J Dermatol. 2018; 57(10):1165–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Major B, Eliezer D, Rieck H. The psychological weight of weight stigma. Soc Psychol Pers Sci. 2012;3(6):651–658. [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Corrigan PW, Rüsch N. Mental illness stereotypes and clinical care: do people avoid treatment because of stigma? Psychiatr Rehabilitation Skills. 2002;6(3):312–334. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Boyle MP. Enacted stigma and felt stigma experienced by adults who stutter. J Commun Disord. 2018;73:50–61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1

Articles from Journal of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis are provided here courtesy of Health Research Alliance manuscript submission

RESOURCES