SUMMARY:
High-resolution MR imaging of peripheral nerves is becoming more common and practical with the increasing availability of 3T magnets. There are multiple reports of MR imaging of peripheral nerves in compression and entrapment neuropathies. However, there is a relative paucity of literature on MRN appearance of diffuse peripheral nerve lesions. We attempted to highlight the salient imaging features of myriad diffuse peripheral nerve disorders and imaging techniques for MRN. Using clinical and pathologically proved relevant examples, we present the MRN appearance of various types of diffuse peripheral nerve lesions, such as traumatic, inflammatory, infectious, hereditary, radiation-induced, neoplastic, and tumor variants.
High-resolution MR imaging of peripheral nerves is becoming more common and practical with increasing availability of 3T magnets. These magnets provide high SNR, which can be used for a quicker acquisition time as well as higher image contrast and resolution. There have been multiple reports of MR imaging of peripheral nerves in compression and entrapment neuropathies.1–3 However, there is a relative paucity of literature on the MRN appearance of diffuse peripheral nerve lesions.4 These lesions seen on MR imaging present a diagnostic dilemma because a long list of pathologies could be causing them. We attempt to highlight the salient imaging features of myriad diffuse peripheral nerve disorders and to describe a diagnostic approach to these lesions on the basis of the available literature and our experience in this area. Various clinical and pathologically proved relevant examples of these pathologies are illustrated.
High-Resolution MRN Technique
MRN techniques can be broadly divided into T2-based imaging or diffusion-based imaging. T2-based MR imaging of peripheral nerves is generally preferred over diffusion-based imaging because radiologists and technologists are more familiar with T2-based imaging; moreover, the techniques and the pulse sequences are easier to implement.5 Diffusion-based imaging of peripheral nerves is still in the research phase due to suboptimal SNR obtained in peripheral nerve imaging and at present has not been widely implemented.6,7 T2-based MRN imaging relies on obtaining high-resolution (2- to 3-mm section thickness) T1WI SE/T1WI FLAIR images and T2WIFS SE/SPAIR/STIR images in multiple planes (Fig 1). The abundant fat around the fascicles and the nerve itself makes these structures clearly visible on T1WI. STIR works best at 1.5T, while SPAIR with varying flip angles is the favored fat-suppression technique for 3T magnets because it provides higher SNR than STIR images.1 T2WIFS may provide inhomogeneous fat suppression, especially for large peripheral areas of the body chosen for evaluation of diffuse nerve lesions. 3D pulse sequences such as SPACE have been reported to perform well at 1.5T and 3T MR imaging (Fig 2 ).8 Multiplanar reconstructions of these 3D sequences allow good depiction of peripheral nerves, which commonly course through a variety of obliquities.
Normal and Abnormal Peripheral Nerves on High-Resolution MRN Imaging
The reader should carefully evaluate various characteristics of peripheral nerves on high-resolution MRN imaging (Table 1), such as size, signal intensity, fascicular pattern (Fig 1), and course (Fig 2). Various imaging criteria are helpful in differentiating a normal peripheral nerve from a diseased nerve (Fig 1).1, 9 Intravenous administration of gadolinium is also helpful in detecting abnormal nerve and denervated muscle enhancement in patients suspected of various inflammatory, infectious, and neoplastic neuropathies.
Table 1:
MR Imaging Characteristic | Normal Peripheral Nerve | Abnormal Peripheral Nerve |
---|---|---|
Size | Decreases distally, similar or smaller than accompanying artery | Focal or diffuse enlargement, larger than accompanying artery |
Signal intensity on T1WI | Isointense to skeletal muscle | Isointense to skeletal muscle |
Signal intensity on fluid-sensitive sequences (SPAIR, T2WIFS or STIR images) | Isointense (SPAIR/fat sat T2WI) to minimal hyperintensity (STIR) | Moderate-to-marked hyperintensity approaching fluid signal similar to that in adjoining veins |
Fascicular pattern | Seen on both T1WI and T2WI, especially in larger nerves | Enlarged single or multiple fascicles, loss of normal fascicular pattern |
Course | Well-outlined by perineural fat, which is best seen on T1WI | Deviated from normal course |
Enhancement with intravenous gadolinium | No appreciable enhancementa | Abnormal enhancement when blood-nerve barrier is breached |
Indirect signs, muscle denervation changes | Absent | Muscle edema or fatty atrophy may be present |
Exception: enhancement may be seen in dorsal nerve root ganglia of normal peripheral nerves, where blood-nerve barrier is absent.
Etiology of Diffuse Peripheral Nerve Lesions
Diffuse peripheral nerve lesions may be divided into traumatic, inflammatory, infectious, hereditary, radiation-induced, neoplastic, and tumor variants (Table 2). 10–18 Relevant examples of cases from each category with their MRN imaging characteristics are illustrated (Table 3).
Table 2:
Classification |
Traumatic |
Inflammatory |
Brachial plexitis |
CIDP |
MMN |
Vasculitis |
Infectious |
Pyogenic, viral, leprosy, others |
Hereditary |
CMT/HSMN |
Radiation plexopathy/neuropathy |
Neoplastic and tumor variants |
Neurofibromatosis |
NL |
Perineuroma |
FLH |
Amyloidosis |
Table 3:
Etiology | Enlargement | T2 Hyperintensity | Fascicular Pattern | Course | Enhancement |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Trauma | ± | + | Minimally effaced/disrupted | May be altered due to hematoma/fracture | – |
Acute inflammation | ± | ++ | Effaced/preserved | Not altered | + |
CIDP | ++ | +++ | Effaced/enlarged | Not altered | ++ |
Infectious | +/++ | ++ | Effaced/disrupted | May be altered by abscess/granulation tissue | ++ |
CMT/HSMN | ++ | ++ | Preserved ↑ fatty infiltration around atrophic fascicles | Normal | ± |
Radiation | ± (linear; geographic distribution of radiation field) | + | Preserved/effaced | Altered in subacute-chronic stages due to developing fibrosis | + |
NL | ++ | ++ | Effaced/disrupted | Altered with focal masses | ++ |
NF1 | ++ | ++ | Preserved | Altered with focal masses | +/++ |
MPNST in NF1 | +++ | +, Necrotic areas | Disrupted | Altered due to mass-effect | ++ (heterogeneous) |
Perineuroma | ++ | ++ | Preserved/effaced focally | Altered with focal masses | ++ |
FLH | +++ | + (fat causing T1 hyperintensity) | Preserved (coaxial cable/spaghetti) | Altered with thick tortuous nerve | – |
Amyloid | ++ | + Cutaneous induration with subcutaneus stranding | Preserved/disrupted focally | Altered with focal masses | ± |
± indicates variable; +, mild; ++, moderate; +++, marked; –. absent.
Traumatic Neuropathy
Direct trauma to the peripheral nerve may be caused by stretching or laceration during a traumatic event. Other mechanisms of injury include acute or chronic compression related to hematoma, bony fracture, and ischemia and, rarely, intramuscular injections.10 Superficial nerves and fascicles that lie along the periphery of the nerve may be affected more severely in direct trauma, such as greater involvement of the peroneal component of the sciatic nerve by external trauma or compression.19 MRN may not only show the abnormal nerve (Fig 3), thereby confirming the clinical suspicion, but may also demonstrate the underlying causative lesion.
Inflammatory Neuritis
Peripheral nerves may be affected by a variety of inflammatory processes, and the clinically suspected pathologic nerves can be visualized in detail with high-resolution MRN imaging. Brachial plexus neuritis (plexitis) is a common occurrence. It is possibly immune-mediated and inflammatory, as is the form furste of acute GBS.11 The usual presentation is sudden onset of pain, followed by weakness and paraesthesia.20 There have been possible associations with viral or bacterial infection, vaccination, trauma, or surgery. This condition is self-limiting (4–6 weeks), and treatment is conservative. MRN plays a crucial role in its management because it may confirm the diagnosis of brachial plexitis (Fig 4 ) as well as distinguish it from cervical radiculopathy. Surgery is needed for the latter diagnosis. Brachial neuritis involves multiple nerves, unlike the fixed nerve distribution of cervical spondylosis and degenerative disk disease.
CIDP
CIDP is rare and is considered the chronic counterpart of GBS; the peak of illness in GBS is <4 weeks.12,21 The clinical features include a chronic course (>2 months); and proximal and distal muscle weakness with sensory involvement, areflexia, and albuminocytologic dissociation (Figs 5 and 6).
Infectious Neuropathy
Involvement of peripheral nerves in leprosy (Hansen disease, Fig 7 ) is well-known, and specific findings such as nerve calcifications in subacute-chronic phases may be seen.13,22 Pyogenic infections are rarer and may involve the nerve by direct extension (Fig 8 ).
Hereditary Neuropathy
CMT is a rare disease14; it is also known as hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy. A positive family history may be found in as many as 80% of cases.(23) The usual clinical presentation is chronic degeneration of peripheral nerves and roots, with muscle atrophy and sensory impairment in a distal distribution.(15,24) Clinical findings include atrophy and sensory loss affecting all extremities, ataxia, areflexia, palpably enlarged peripheral nerves, pes cavus, and hammer toes. Bilateral lumbosacral plexus and peripheral nerve involvement are common. The enlarged nerves are frequently related to increased fatty interfascicular epineurium with demyelinating atrophic fascicles (Fig 9 ).
Radiation Neuropathy
There may be a long and variable interval (weeks to years) between radiation therapy and the onset of symptoms.(16) It is essentially a diagnosis of exclusion. Neoplastic disease (primary or metastatic), infectious, and other etiologies should be ruled out first (Fig 10 ). The severity is dose-dependent, and radiation neuropathy is seen more commonly with doses of >60 Gy.(25)
Neoplasia and Tumor Variants
A variety of tumors and tumor variants may involve the peripheral nerves. The role of MR imaging has been widely reported and is well-defined in neurofibromatosis (Figs 11 and 12). Multiple signs, such as a bag-of-worms appearance in plexiform neurofibroma, “split fat” sign on T1WI, and target and tail signs on T2WI, have been described.(26,27) Other signs that may help to differentiate malignant from benign nerve sheath tumors are size >5 cm, necrosis or heterogeneous enhancement, and invasion of surrounding structures.(26) NL or lymphomatous infiltration of the peripheral nerves has been reported in ≤40% of patients dying of lymphoma.(18) The typical presentation is progressive sensorimotor neuropathy, and the diagnosis is usually confirmed by a histopathologic examination (nerve biopsy or autopsy) demonstrating lymphomatous infiltration of nerves (Fig 13 ).
Perineuroma is a benign tumor of neoplastic perineural cells (Fig 14 ). It may present as mononeuropathy or plexopathy. Motor symptoms with extensive chronic muscle denervation changes are more commonly seen than sensory symptoms.(28,29) FLH is a rare benign lesion, which has distinctive features on MR imaging.(30,31) The median nerve is affected most commonly; however, it can also be seen at other sites (Fig 15 ). A variety of proteins may be deposited in nerves with systemic amyloidosis, resulting in severe progressive mixed neuropathy and autonomic dysfunction.(17,32) The MR imaging appearance of amyloidosis of nerves has also been described (Fig 16 ).(33)
Summary
Diffuse abnormalities of peripheral nerves may be seen with numerous pathoetiologies. Currently, biopsy and pathologic examination of the nerves remain the only definitive ways of achieving a final diagnosis. However, a high-resolution MRN examination may be used to confirm the clinical suspicion and exclude other etiologies, such as a compressive mass lesion; in the correct clinical setting, it may aid in diagnosis and management of these lesions. Future research is needed to further validate the outlined differentiating MR imaging features of diffusely diseased peripheral nerves.
Abbreviations
- CIDP =
chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy;
- CMT =
Charcot-Marie-Tooth;
- fat sat =
fat saturated;
- FLAIR =
fluid-attenuated inversion recovery;
- FLH =
fibrolipomatous hamartoma;
- GBS =
Guillain Barré syndrome;
- CMT/HSMN =
Charcot-Marie-Tooth/hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy;
- MMN =
multifocal motor neuropathy;
- MPNST =
malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor;
- MRN =
MR neurography;
- NF1 =
neurofibromatosis type 1;
- NL =
neurolymphomatosis;
- SE =
spin-echo;
- SNR =
signal-to-noise ratio;
- SPACE =
sampling perfection with application-optimized contrasts by using different flip angle evolutions;
- SPAIR =
spectral-attenuated inversion recovery;
- STIR =
short-tau inversion recovery;
- T1WI =
T1-weighted imaging;
- T1WIFS =
T1-weighted fat-saturated imaging;
- T2WI =
T2-weighted imaging;
- T2WIFS =
T2-weighted fat-saturated imaging
Footnotes
K.C.W. was supported by the Radiological Society of North America Research and Education Foundation Fellowship Training Grant FT0904 and the Walter and Mary Ciceric Research Award.
Paper previously presented as an Electronic Scientific Exhibit at: Annual Meeting of the American Society of Neuroradiology, May 15–20, 2010; Boston, Massachusetts.
References
- 1. Chhabra A, Williams EH, Wang KC, et al. MR neurography of neuromas related to nerve injury and entrapment with surgical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1363–68 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Kim S, Choi JY, Huh YM, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in entrapment and compressive neuropathy: what, where, and how to see the peripheral nerves on the musculoskeletal magnetic resonance image. Part 1. Overview and lower extremity. Eur Radiol 2007;17:139–49 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Kim S, Choi JY, Huh YM, et al. Role of magnetic resonance imaging in entrapment and compressive neuropathy: what, where, and how to see the peripheral nerves on the musculoskeletal magnetic resonance image. Part 2. Upper extremity. Eur Radiol 2007;17:509–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Amrami KK, Felmlee JP, Spinner RJ.. MRI of peripheral nerves. Neurosurg Clin N Am 2008;19:559–72 vi [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Kuntz C, 4th, Blake L, Britz G, et al. Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve lesions in the lower extremity. Neurosurgery 1996;39:750–56 discussion 756–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Zhang Z, Song L, Meng Q, et al. Morphological analysis in patients with sciatica: a magnetic resonance imaging study using three-dimensional high-resolution diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance neurography techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2009;34:E245–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Yamashita T, Kwee TC, Takahara T.. Whole-body magnetic resonance neurography. N Engl J Med 2009;361:538–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lichy MP, Wietek BM, Mugler JP, 3rd, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the body trunk using a single-slab, 3-dimensional, T2-weighted turbo-spin-echo sequence with high sampling efficiency (SPACE) for high spatial resolution imaging: initial clinical experiences. Invest Radiol 2005;40:754–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Hormann M, Traxler H, Ba-Ssalamah A, et al. Correlative high-resolution MR-anatomic study of sciatic, ulnar, and proper palmar digital nerve. Magn Reson Imaging 2003;21:879–85 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Plewnia C, Wallace C, Zochodne D.. Traumatic sciatic neuropathy: a novel cause, local experience, and a review of the literature. J Trauma 1999;47:986–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Sureka J, Cherian RA, Alexander M, et al. MRI of brachial plexopathies. Clin Radiol 2009;64:208–18 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Koller H, Schroeter M, Kieseier BC, et al. Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy: update on pathogenesis, diagnostic criteria and therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 2005;18:273–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Bertolotto M, et al. US and MR imaging of peripheral nerves in leprosy. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29:142–50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Berciano J, Combarros O.. Hereditary neuropathies. Curr Opin Neurol 2003;16:613–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Choi SK, Bowers RP, Buckthal PE.. MR imaging in hypertrophic neuropathy: a case of hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy, type I (Charcot-Marie-Tooth). Clin Imaging 1990;14:204–07 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Mondrup K, Olsen NK, Pfeiffer P, et al. Clinical and electrodiagnostic findings in breast cancer patients with radiation-induced brachial plexus neuropathy. Acta Neurol Scand 1990;81:153–58 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Reilly MM, Staunton H.. Peripheral nerve amyloidosis. Brain Pathol 1996;6:163–77 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Krendel DA, Stahl RL, Chan WC.. Lymphomatous polyneuropathy: biopsy of clinically involved nerve and successful treatment. Arch Neurol 1991;48:330–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Yuen EC, So YT.. Sciatic neuropathy. Neurol Clin 1999;17:617–31 viii [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Miller JD, Pruitt S, McDonald TJ.. Acute brachial plexus neuritis: an uncommon cause of shoulder pain. Am Fam Physician 2000;62:2067–72 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Bradley LJ, Wilhelm T, King RH, et al. Brachial plexus hypertrophy in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. Neuromuscul Disord 2006;16:126–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Benedetti PF, Anderson MW, Maselli R, et al. Hypertrophic peripheral neuropathy due to leprosy: MR features. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:995–96 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Emery AE.. Population frequencies of inherited neuromuscular diseases: a world survey. Neuromuscul Disord 1991;1:19–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Tachi N, Kozuka N, Ohya K, et al. MRI of peripheral nerves and pathology of sural nerves in hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy type III. Neuroradiology 1995;37:496–99 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Petit-Lacour MC, Ducreux D, Adams D.. MRI of the brachial plexus. J Neuroradiol 2004;31:198–206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Bhargava R, Parham DM, Lasater OE, et al. MR imaging differentiation of benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors: use of the target sign. Pediatr Radiol 1997;27:124–29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Li CS, Huang GS, Wu HD, et al. Differentiation of soft tissue benign and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors with magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Imaging 2008;32:121–27 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Boyanton BL, Jr, Jones JK, Shenaq SM, et al. Intraneural perineurioma: a systematic review with illustrative cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2007;131:1382–92 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Merlini L, Viallon M, De Coulon G, et al. MRI neurography and diffusion tensor imaging of a sciatic perineuroma in a child. Pediatr Radiol 2008;38:1009–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Nguyen V, Choi J, Davis KW.. Imaging of wrist masses. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2004;33:147–60 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Nilsson J, Sandberg K, Dahlin LB, et al. Fibrolipomatous hamartoma in the median nerve in the arm: an unusual location but with MR imaging characteristics—a case report. J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj 2010;5:1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Haridas A, Basu S, King A, et al. Primary isolated amyloidoma of the lumbar spine causing neurological compromise: case report and literature review. Neurosurgery 2005;57:E196 discussion E196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Metzler JP, Fleckenstein JL, White CL, 3rd, et al. MRI evaluation of amyloid myopathy. Skeletal Radiol 1992;21:463–65 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]