Skip to main content
AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology logoLink to AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology
letter
. 2013 Jun;34(6):E72. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3571

High-Pass-Filtered Phase Image: Left- versus Right-Handed MR Imaging Systems

TM Mehemed a, A Yamamoto a
PMCID: PMC7964596  PMID: 23538416

We read with interest the article entitled “Detection of Intratumoral Calcification in Oligodendrogliomas by Susceptibility-Weighted MR Imaging”1 and would like to comment on the appearance of calcification on the high-pass-filtered phase images.

The authors reported that the paramagnetic (authors wrote “diamagnetic”) hemorrhagic component of the tumor would cause a negative phase shift and appear as dark signal on the high-pass-filtered phase images, while the diamagnetic (authors wrote “paramagnetic”) intratumoral calcifications would cause an opposite positive phase shift and appear as bright signal on the high-pass-filtered phase images. This description is true, but only in the case of right-handed MR imaging systems, while in left-handed MR imaging systems, the complete opposite signal would be seen: Paramagnetic substances would appear bright, while diamagnetic substances would appear dark.2,3

In Figs 2D and 3D of the above-mentioned article, the high-pass-filtered phase images are those of a left-handed MR imaging system, evident by the bright signal of the veins (paramagnetic deoxyhemoglobin).3

The article showed that high-pass-filtered phase images can depict intratumoral calcification in oligodendrogliomas better than conventional MR images; this finding has been reported before.4 Understanding the contrast appearance of high-pass-filtered phase images on left-handed versus right-handed MR imaging systems would make distinguishing diamagnetic calcification from paramagnetic hemorrhage a much easier task and prevent any possible confusion.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Zulfiqar M, Dumrongpisutikul N, Intrapiromkul J, et al. Detection of intratumoral calcification in oligodendrogliomas by susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:858–64 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Duyn J, Speck O. Brain Anatomy with Phase. In: Haacke EM, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in MRI: Basic Concepts and Clinical Applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011:121–36 [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Mittal S, Thomas B, Wu Z, et al. Novel approaches to imaging brain tumors. In: Haacke EM, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility Weighted Imaging in MRI: Basic Concepts and Clinical Applications. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2011:151–70 [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Wu Z, Mittal S, Kish K, et al. Identification of calcification with MRI using susceptibility-weighted imaging: a case study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2009;29:177–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from AJNR: American Journal of Neuroradiology are provided here courtesy of American Society of Neuroradiology

RESOURCES