Abstract
Alkylation represents a main form of DNA damage. The N2 position of guanine is frequently alkylated in DNA. The SOS-induced polymerases have been shown to be capable of bypassing various DNA damage products in Escherichia coli. Herein, we explored the influences of four N2-alkyl-dG lesions (alkyl = ethyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, or sec-butyl) on DNA replication in AB1157 E. coli cells and the corresponding strains with polymerases (Pol) II, IV, and V being individually or simultaneously knocked out. We found that N2-Et-dG is slightly less blocking to DNA replication than the N2-Bu-dG lesions, which display very similar replication bypass efficiencies. Additionally, Pol II and, to a lesser degree, Pol IV and Pol V are required for the efficient bypass of the N2-alkyl-dG adducts, and none of these lesions was mutagenic. Together, our results support that the efficient replication across small N2-alkyl-dG DNA adducts in E. coli depends mainly on Pol II.
Graphical Abstract

Cells are continuously exposed to alkylating agents that can damage DNA, and the N2 position of guanine is a common site of alkylation.1,2 For instance, the N2 of guanine is susceptible to reaction with formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, which can be produced endogenously or present in external sources, including diesel exhaust, cigarette smoke, etc.3,4 In addition, methylglyoxal, an air pollutant and a byproduct of endogenous glycolysis, can induce the stable N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguanosine (N2-CE-dG) in DNA.5
DNA adducts, if left unrepaired, can block DNA replication and induce nucleobase substitutions in that process; if mutations occur in oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, these adducts may contribute to carcinogenesis.5–7 To ameliorate the genotoxic effects of DNA lesions, cells are equipped with various DNA repair machineries to remove these lesions. Cells are also evolved with DNA damage tolerance pathways to cope with unrepaired lesions, where translesion synthesis (TLS) is one of these pathways for overcoming replication blockage conferred by DNA lesions.1,8,9 In Escherichia coli, three TLS polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV, and Pol V) can be induced under SOS conditions; Pol II and Pol IV participate in mainly error-free TLS of specific DNA lesions, whereas Pol V can bypass a wide range of DNA lesions in a more error-prone manner.10
Several studies have been conducted to examine the effects of N2-alkyl-dG adducts on DNA replication in cells. Yuan et al.11 showed that the R diastereomer of N2-CE-dG blocks DNA replication more strongly than the S diastereomer in E. coli, and replicative bypass of these lesions is largely error-free, where Pol IV is required for the accurate and efficient bypass of these lesions. In addition, faithful replication of N2-CE-dG and a number of simple N2-alkyl-dG lesions (alkyl = Me, Et, nPr, and nBu) in mammalian cells requires polymerases κ and ι, where Pol κ is the mammalian ortholog of E. coli Pol IV.11,12 On the other hand, Shrivastav et al.13 found that the replication across N2-Me-dG and N2-Et-dG is accurate and efficient in E. coli cells; depletion of Pol IV, however, does not perturb the efficiency or fidelity of replication across these lesions. It has not yet been investigated systematically how simple N2-alkyl-dG lesions influence DNA replication in E. coli cells or how the three SOS-induced DNA polymerases modulate the replication across these lesions. To answer these questions, we examined the efficiencies and fidelities of replication across four N2-alkyl-dG lesions with different sizes and various structures of alkyl groups (N2-Et-dG, N2-nBu-dG, N2-iBu-dG, and N2-sBu-dG, Figure 1) in E. coli cells and the functions of the SOS-induced DNA polymerases in supporting their replication bypass.
Figure 1.

N2-Alkyl-dG lesions investigated in this study.
We utilized a modified competitive replication and adduct bypass (CRAB) assay11 to explore how replication efficiency and fidelity of a single-stranded M13 plasmid are influenced by the presence of site-specifically inserted N2-alkyl-dG lesions (Figure 2 and Figures S1–S5). In brief, lesion-containing single-stranded M13 plasmids were mixed individually with a lesion-free competitor plasmid at a specific molar ratio and allowed to replicate in SOS-induced AB1157 E. coli cells that are proficient in TLS or with one or more SOS-induced DNA polymerases being genetically depleted. In this respect, the competitor genome, which harbors three more nucleotides but is lesion-free, acts as an internal standard for measuring the replication efficiency across the damage site. After progeny genome isolation, PCR amplification, and restriction digestion, the released oligodeoxyribonucleotides (ODNs) were analyzed by LC-MS/MS and native PAGE to identify and quantify the replication products.
Figure 2.

Restriction digestion and postlabeling method for determining the cytotoxic and mutagenic properties of N2-alkyl-dG lesions in wild-type AB1157 E. coli and the isogenic strains deficient in one or more SOS-induced DNA polymerases. (A) Restriction digestion and selective radiolabeling of the original lesion-containing strand or its complementary strand. (B,C) Representative gel images showing the BbsI/MlucI-produced restriction fragments of interest from the PCR products of progeny genomes of the indicated lesion- or control dG-containing plasmids isolated from SOS-induced wild-type (WT) and Pol II-deficient AB1157 E. coli cells. (D) Bypass efficiencies of N2-alkyl-dG lesions in SOS-induced wild-type AB1157 cells and isogenic polymerase-deficient cells. (E) Bypass efficiencies of N2-alkyl-dG lesions in wild-type and Pol II-deficient AB1157 E. coli cells without SOS induction. The bypass efficiency was calculated by using the following equation: bypass efficiency (%) = (10mer lesion signal/13mer competitor signal)/(10mer control signal/13mer competitor signal) × 100%. The data represent the mean ± SEM of results acquired from three independent replication experiments. *, 0.01 ≤ P < 0.05; **, 0.001 ≤ P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001. The P values in (D) were calculated using a two-tailed, unpaired t test, and the values refer to the comparisons between SOS-induced WT and the isogenic TLS polymerase-deficient cells (listed above the columns for the polymerase-deficient cells).
The results from native PAGE analyses of the ensuing radiolabeled fragments revealed that no mutagenic products were induced by any of the N2-alkyl-dG lesions, and a similar finding was made from LC-MS/MS analysis of the corresponding non-radiolabeled restriction fragments (Figure 2B,C and Figures S3–S5). We also determined the bypass efficiencies of the N2-alkyl-dG lesions by measuring the ratio of intensity of the 10mer band arising from the lesion-containing genome over that of the 13mer band emanating from the lesion-free competitor genome and further normalizing the ratio to that observed for the control dG-containing genome. The results showed that all four N2-alkyl-dG lesions could impede DNA replication in SOS-induced E. coli cells, with the bypass efficiencies for N2-Et-dG, N2-nBu-dG, N2-iBu-dG, and N2-sBu-dG being 36.5, 31.5, 27.1, and 28.5%, respectively. Hence, the three N2-Bu-dG lesions display blockage effects on DNA replication slightly stronger than that with N2-Et-dG; the replication efficiencies across the three N2-Bu-dG lesions are, nonetheless, not appreciably affected by the structures of the butyl groups (nBu, iBu, and sBu) (Figure 2D).
It is worth noting that the bypass efficiency for N2-Et-dG observed in the present study is lower than what was observed previously by Shrivastav et al.,13 which could be attributed to different flanking sequences of the lesion employed in the two studies. In this vein, sequence contexts surrounding DNA damage sites are known to modulate the efficiencies and fidelities of DNA replication across these sites.14,15 The bypass efficiencies for N2-Et-dG and N2-nBu-dG obtained from this study were also lower than what Wu et al.12 reported recently for the same lesions in HEK293T human embryonic kidney cells, which could be due to differences in replication machineries in E. coli and human cells.
We next examined the roles of Pol II, Pol IV, and Pol V in bypassing the N2-alkyl-dG adducts by performing the replication experiments using the SOS-induced isogenic E. coli strains where these polymerases were individually or concurrently ablated. Except that depletion of Pol IV alone did not give rise to significant drops in bypass efficiencies for N2-Et-dG or N2-nBu-dG, individual depletion of each of the three SOS-induced DNA polymerases led to substantial attenuations in bypass efficiencies for all four N2-alkyl-dG lesions, with the most pronounced decreases being observed for the Pol II-deficient background (Figure 2D). Additional drops in bypass efficiencies were observed for the three N2-Bu-dG lesions in Pol IV and Pol V double knockout background compared to those with depletion of either polymerase alone (Figure 2D).
For comparison, we also examined how these lesions modulate the replicative bypass of these lesions in wild-type and Pol II-depleted AB1157 cells without SOS induction. Our results showed that SOS induction led to augmented bypass efficiencies for all four lesions in AB1157 cells (Figure 2D,E). Depletion of Pol II, however, does not alter appreciably the bypass efficiencies for any of the four N2-alkyl-dG lesions in AB1157 cells without SOS induction (Figure 2E). It was shown previously that SOS induction could give rise to a 7-fold elevation in expression level of Pol II.16 Thus, the lack of effect of Pol II deletion on the bypass efficiencies of these lesions in uninduced E. coli cells could be due to the relatively low level of expression of Pol II in wild-type AB1157 cells without SOS induction.
Exposure to endogenous and exogenous genotoxic agents can lead to the formation of various DNA lesions, many of which block replicative DNA polymerases and require TLS polymerases for their replicative bypass.17 A large body of literature revealed the roles of B- and Y-family polymerases in modulating the cytotoxic and mutagenic properties of various DNA lesions.18,19 In this vein, Pol IV and Pol V were found to participate in error-free TLS and induce a −1 frameshift mutation at the site of an N2-dG adduct of benzo[a]pyrene; Pol II, however, is involved in bypassing the bulky N2-dG adduct of acetylaminofluorene and elicits a −2 frameshift mutation at the lesion site.20,21 In addition, previous in vitro biochemical studies showed that purified Pol IV preferentially inserts a dCMP opposite N2-Et-dG, N2-iBu-dG, and N2-CE-dG in template DNA,11,22 though the kinetic parameters for nucleotide insertions opposite simple N2-alkyl-dG lesions were not measured. It will be important to determine, in the future, the efficiencies and fidelities of Pol II- and Pol IV-catalyzed nucleotide incorporation opposite the N2-alkyl-dG lesions.
The major finding from the present study is about the contributions of the three SOS-induced DNA polymerases, namely, Pol II, Pol IV, and Pol V, in bypassing four minor-groove N2-alkyl-dG adducts (alkyl = Et, nBu, iBu, and sBu) in E. coli cells. Similar to what were observed for N2-furfuryl-dG and N2-tetrahydrofuran-2-yl-methyl-dG lesions,13 we found that the smaller N2-Et-dG and N2-Bu-dGs were not mutagenic in AB1157 cells or any of the isogenic polymerase-deficient strains tested. Our results support that all three TLS polymerases in E. coli are involved in the error-free TLS of these four lesions. A small alkyl group adducted to the N2 of guanine does not strongly impair the base-pairing property of the nucleobase, whereas those adducts with large alkyl groups can induce DNA frameshifts or single-base substitutions during DNA replication.20 Meanwhile the loss of Pol II results in the most marked diminutions in bypass efficiencies in SOS-induced AB1157 cells, underscoring the major role of this polymerase in overcoming the replication blockage imposed by these N2-alkyl-dG lesions.
It is worth noting that Pol IV was found to be the major DNA polymerase responsible for bypassing N2-CE-dG lesions in vivo,11 whereas Pol II was the main polymerase involved in bypassing the N2-dG lesions with small alkyl groups. The exact reason for these differences remains unclear and awaits further investigation. In this vein, the X-ray crystal structure of a ternary complex of E. coli Pol II, duplex DNA, and an incoming dCTP showed that the active site of the polymerase facing the minor-groove N2 position of template dG is quite spacious,23 which should be able to accommodate alkyl groups adducted to the N2 of dG (Figure S6). This may explain Pol II’s role in supporting the accurate and efficient bypass of N2-alkyl-dG lesions. In this context, it is of note that minor-groove O2-alkyl-dT lesions are highly mutagenic in E. coli cells and their efficient bypass mainly requires Pol V.24
These previously published results, together with the observations made from the present study, indicate that all three TLS polymerases can participate in bypassing minor-groove lesions; Pol V tends to transverse, in an error-prone manner, those lesions with the hydrogen bonding properties of the nucleobases being disrupted (e.g. the O2-alkyl-dT lesions), whereas Pol II and Pol IV tend to bypass accurately minor-groove N2-alkyl-dG lesions. Moreover, DNA Pol II, which is B-family DNA polymerase, was also found to participate in the error-free bypass of a major-groove N6-benz[a]anthracene adenine adduct.20 Along this line, several B-family polymerases were shown to possess a conserved motif that scans the DNA minor groove for lesions and misincorporations.25 Therefore, Pol II is capable of bypassing accurately both major- and minor-groove alkylated DNA lesions. Together, the results from previous studies and the current work reveal that nuances of TLS can be modulated by the subtle differences in chemical structures of DNA lesions.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (R35 ES031707).
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00478.
Detailed experimental conditions, MS and MS/MS of synthetic ODNs, and MS data and PAGE gel image for monitoring the restriction fragments of replication products of damage and lesion-free genomes (PDF)
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00478
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Yinan Wang, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
Jun Wu, Department of Chemistry, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
Jiabin Wu, Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
Yinsheng Wang, Department of Chemistry and Environmental Toxicology Graduate Program, University of California, Riverside, California 92521-0403, United States.
REFERENCES
- (1).Shrivastav N, Li D, and Essigmann JM (2010) Chemical biology of mutagenesis and DNA repair: cellular responses to DNA alkylation. Carcinogenesis 31, 59–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).Fu D, Calvo JA, and Samson LD (2012) Balancing repair and tolerance of DNA damage caused by alkylating agents. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 104–120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).Cheng G, Shi Y, Sturla SJ, Jalas JR, McIntee EJ, Villalta PW, Wang M, and Hecht SS (2003) Reactions of formaldehyde plus acetaldehyde with deoxyguanosine and DNA: Formation of cyclic deoxyguanosine adducts and formaldehyde cross-links. Chem. Res. Toxicol 16, 145–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).Brooks PJ, and Theruvathu JA (2005) DNA adducts from acetaldehyde: implications for alcohol-related carcinogenesis. Alcohol 35, 187–193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).Frischmann M, Bidmon C, Angerer J, and Pischetsrieder M (2005) Identification of DNA adducts of methylglyoxal. Chem. Res. Toxicol 18, 1586–1592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).Liu S, and Wang Y (2015) Mass spectrometry for the assessment of the occurrence and biological consequences of DNA adducts. Chem. Soc. Rev 44, 7829–7854. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).You C, and Wang Y (2016) Mass spectrometry-based quantitative strategies for assessing the biological consequences and repair of DNA adducts. Acc. Chem. Res 49, 205–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).Ohmori H, Friedberg EC, Fuchs RP, Goodman MF, Hanaoka F, Hinkle D, Kunkel TA, Lawrence CW, Livneh Z, Nohmi T, Prakash L, Prakash S, Todo T, Walker GC, Wang Z, and Woodgate R (2001) The Y-family of DNA polymerases. Mol. Cell 8, 7–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).Hong H, Cao H, and Wang Y (2007) Formation and genotoxicity of a guanine-cytosine intrastrand cross-link lesion in vivo. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 7118–7127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).Goodman MF, and Woodgate R (2013) Translesion DNA polymerases. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol 5, a010363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (11).Yuan B, Cao H, Jiang Y, Hong H, and Wang Y (2008) Efficient and accurate bypass of N2-(1-carboxyethyl)-2′-deoxyguano-sine by DinB DNA polymerase in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 105, 8679–8684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).Wu J, Du H, Li L, Price NE, Liu X, and Wang Y (2019) The impact of minor-groove N2-alkyl-2′-deoxyguanosine lesions on DNA replication in human cells. ACS Chem. Biol 14, 1708–1716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).Shrivastav N, Fedeles BI, Li D, Delaney JC, Frick LE, Foti JJ, Walker GC, and Essigmann JM (2014) A chemical genetics analysis of the roles of bypass polymerase DinB and DNA repair protein AlkB in processing N2-alkylguanine lesions in vivo. PLoS One 9, No. e94716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).Delaney JC, and Essigmann JM (1999) Context-dependent mutagenesis by DNA lesions. Chem. Biol 6, 743–753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).Yuan B, Jiang Y, Wang Y, and Wang Y (2010) Efficient formation of the tandem thymine glycol/8-oxo-7,8-dihydroguanine lesion in isolated DNA and the mutagenic and cytotoxic properties of the tandem lesions in Escherichia coli cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol 23, 11–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Qiu Z, and Goodman MF (1997) The Escherichia coli polB locus is identical to dinA, the structural gene for DNA polymerase II. Characterization of Pol II purified from a polB mutant. J. Biol. Chem 272, 8611–8617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).Bauer NC, Corbett AH, and Doetsch PW (2015) The current state of eukaryotic DNA base damage and repair. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 10083–10101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Sale JE, Lehmann AR, and Woodgate R (2012) Y-family DNA polymerases and their role in tolerance of cellular DNA damage. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol 13, 141–152. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (19).Gan GN, Wittschieben JP, Wittschieben BØ, and Wood RD (2008) DNA polymerase zeta (pol ζ) in higher eukaryotes. Cell Res. 18, 174–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Napolitano R, Janel-Bintz R, Wagner J, and Fuchs RP (2000) All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis. EMBO J. 19, 6259–6265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).Becherel OJ, and Fuchs RP (2001) Mechanism of DNA polymerase II-mediated frameshift mutagenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A 98, 8566–8571. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (22).Ghodke PP, and Pradeepkumar PI (2020) Site-specific N2-dG DNA adducts: Formation, synthesis, and TLS polymerase-mediated bypass. Eur. J. Org. Chem, 6831–6844. [Google Scholar]
- (23).Wang F, andYang W (2009) Structural insight into translesion synthesis by DNA Pol II. Cell 139, 1279–1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (24).Zhai Q, Wang P, Cai Q, and Wang Y (2014) Syntheses and characterizations of the in vivo replicative bypass and mutagenic properties of the minor-groove O2-alkylthymidine lesions. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, 10529–10537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).Swan MK, Johnson RE, Prakash L, Prakash S, and Aggarwal AK (2009) Structural basis of high-fidelity DNA synthesis by yeast DNA polymerase δ. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 16, 979–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
