Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:
Embolization is an important therapeutic technique in brain arteriovenous malformations; however, little has been reported on the factors contributing to complications. We retrospectively reviewed a large series of supratentorial brain AVMs to identify the angioarchitectural characteristics that might be associated with the complications of embolization and poor clinical outcomes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
The clinical and angiographic features of 130 consecutive patients with supratentorial brain AVMs embolized with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer in our hospital from 2005–2008 were retrospectively reviewed. None of these patients had prior embolization. Complications were classified as transient neurologic deficits, persistent neurologic deficits, and death. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to assess the angiographic features in patients with and without complications.
RESULTS:
Twenty-three complications occurred in 130 embolization procedures, 13 (10%) were transient neurologic deficits (9 ischemic and 4 hemorrhagic), 9 (6.92%) were persistent neurologic deficits (7 ischemic and 2 hemorrhagic), and 1 death occurred. By univariate analyses, eloquent cortex (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.08–3.42) and exclusive deep venous drainage (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.28–9.67) were correlated with procedural complications. The impaction of eloquent cortical location (P = .001) and exclusive deep venous drainage (P = .035) on complications were also demonstrated by multivariate analysis. Eloquent cortex mainly resulted in permanent ischemic neurologic deficit; occlusion of drainage vein was significantly correlated with periprocedural hemorrhage in supratentorial brain AVMs with subtotal and partial embolization.
CONCLUSIONS:
In a retrospective study on supratentorial brain AVMs with first-time embolization, 6.92% of patients had permanent neurologic deficit or death. Eloquent cortical location and exclusive deep venous drainage were associated with complications.
Embolization is an important adjunctive therapy to microsurgery and radiosurgery in the multidisciplinary management of arteriovenous malformations.1–3 Recent advances in endovascular embolization techniques including flow-directed microcatheters and the liquid embolic agents n-butyl-cyanoacrylate and ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH; Onyx, ev3, Irvine, California)4 make it possible to cure AVMs with embolization alone.5,6
Because endovascular treatment might result in hemorrhage and ischemic neurologic dysfunction, embolization of unruptured AVMs remains controversial, particularly in supratentorial brain AVMs (sbAVMs), which have a lower risk of hemorrhage than infratentorial AVMs. The reported complication rates of embolization varied from 3–11%2,7–10 and were associated with angiographic features.7
In the present study, we retrospectively reviewed 130 patients with sbAVMs to identify angioarchitectural characteristics that might be associated with the complications of embolization and poor clinical outcomes.
Materials and Methods
All patients referred to our institution were assessed by a multidisciplinary team of neuroradiologists, neurosurgeons, and neurologists for the therapeutic option on the basis of CT, MR imaging, and DSA. A total of 130 consecutive patients with sbAVMs were diagnosed and embolized with Onyx for the first time during the period January 1, 2005 to December 31, 2008, and their demographic, clinical, and angioarchitectural data were reviewed retrospectively. Patients with prior treatment (surgical removal, embolization, radiosurgery) were excluded from the study.
Initial sbAVM presentation was defined as hemorrhage, ischemic neurologic deficit, headache, seizures, and incidental findings. Angioarchitectural characteristics such as location and size of AVM, arterial feeders and coexisting aneurysms, venous drainage, and venous morphology were retrospectively evaluated.
AVM locations were grouped into eloquent cortex, noneloquent cortex, midline region (ventricle, corpus callosum), and deep region (basal ganglia, internal capsule, and thalamus). Spetzler-Martin grade was assessed in each AVM, and sizes were classified into small (3 cm), medium (3 cm and 6 cm), and large (6 cm). Arterial feeders were categorized as terminal and perforating. Terminal feeding arteries were prominent arteries that connected directly to the nidus, whereas perforating feeders referred to the pattern of several small, short arteries arising from a large parent artery and penetrating brain parenchyma to reach the AVM nidus. The presence of coexisting arterial aneurysms was divided into perinidal and intranidal aneurysms. Remote flow-related or unrelated aneurysms were not taken into account in this study. Venous drainage was noted as deep, superficial, and combined groups. Venous morphology was described according to the presence or absence of ectasia and stenosis. Ectasia was defined as focal dilations that were at least twice the size of the venous diameter. A 50% focal reduction of the venous diameter was considered as a significant stenosis.
Embolization degree was classified into partial (<90%), subtotal (≥90%), and complete (100%) embolization. Neurologic deficits were assessed by a neurosurgeon/neurologist according to NIHSS. CT and MR imaging were performed after embolization to identify postprocedural hemorrhage and ischemia. Postprocedural mRS was assessed, and complications of embolization were categorized as transient (new onset of neurologic deficit that resolved completely within 7 days) and persistent neurologic deficit. Neurologic deficits were further divided into ischemic and hemorrhagic.
The data were managed and analyzed by use of SPSS software (version 13.0; IBM, Armonk, New York). We conducted analyses stratified by each variable (age, sex, nidus size, etc) to evaluate its impact on complications of embolization. Furthermore, multivariate analyses (backward conditional logistic regression) were conducted after the adjustment for some variables that demonstrated and correlated with a significantly increased risk of embolization complications in univariate analyses to assess the effect of modification and interaction among potential risk factors. A probability value of <.05 was considered statistically significant in each analysis.
Results
Of the 130 patients with sbAVM who underwent embolization, there were 78 men and 52 women, ranging from 5–64 years of age (mean, 30.27 ± 12.45 years). Initial presentations included 79 spontaneous hemorrhages, 11 ischemic manifestations, 13 headaches, 20 seizures, and 7 nonsymptomatic (Table 1).
Table 1:
Demographic and clinical characteristics of 130 patients with sbAVM embolization
Characteristics | No. (%) |
---|---|
Sex | |
Male | 78 (60%) |
Female | 52 (40%) |
Age, y | |
<18 | 27 (20.77%) |
18–49 | 100 (76.92%) |
≥50 | 3 (2.31%) |
Initial presentation | |
Hemorrhage | 79 (60.77%) |
Ischemia | 11 (8.46%) |
Headache | 13 (10%) |
Seizures | 20 (15.38%) |
No symptoms | 7 (5.38%) |
The preprocedural angioarchitectural characteristics are summarized in Table 2. Most the sbAVMs were medium-sized (61.54%) and located in noneloquent cortices (47.69%). Perforating feeders were found in 35 cases (26.92%), whereas 16 patients (12.31%) had exclusive deep venous drainage. Coexisting aneurysm was noted in 37 cases, of which, 30 (23.08%) were intranidal aneurysms. According to the Spetzler-Martin grading system, the distribution of sbAVMs were 16 in grade I (12.31%); 34 in grade II (26.15%); 36 in grade III (27.69%); 30 in grade IV (23.08%); and 14 in grade V (10.77%).
Table 2:
Preprocedual angioarchitectural characteristics of 130 patients with sbAVM embolization
Angiographic Features | No. (%) |
---|---|
Location | |
Eloquent cortex | 44 (33.85%) |
Noneloquent cortex | 62 (47.69%) |
Midline | 12 (9.23%) |
Deep | 12 (9.23%) |
Size | |
≤3 cm | 32 (24.62%) |
3–6 cm | 80 (61.54%) |
≥6 cm | 18 (13.85%) |
No. of feeders | |
1 | 17 (13.08%) |
2 | 28 (21.54%) |
≥3 | 85 (65.38%) |
Arterial feeders classification | |
Terminal | 95 (73.08%) |
Perforating | 35 (26.92%) |
No. of draining veins | |
1 | 55 (42.31%) |
2 | 37 (28.46%) |
≥3 | 38 (29.23%) |
Venous drainage classification | |
Exclusive superficial | 79 (60.77%) |
Exclusive deep | 16 (12.31%) |
Combined | 35 (26.92%) |
Venous morphology | |
Venous reflux | 35 (26.92%) |
Venous ectasia | 29 (22.31%) |
Venous stenosis | 46 (35.38%) |
Coexisting aneurysm | |
Intranidal | 30 (23.08%) |
Perinidal | 7 (5.38%) |
Spetzler-Martin classification | |
I–II | 50 (38.46%) |
III | 36 (27.69%) |
IV | 30 (23.08%) |
V | 14 (10.77%) |
All patients were embolized with Onyx. The average number of catheterized feeders was 1.26, and the volume of embolic agent was 0.3∼9.5 mL (average, 2.5 ± 1.77 mL). Endovascular treatment achieved complete embolization in 28 patients, subtotal in 26 patients, and partial in 76 patients. In the procedure, draining veins were unexpectedly occluded in 38 cases and associated with hemorrhage in 5 cases (Table 3). Among the patients who had subtotal embolization, 4 were nearly complete, with the residual AVMs approximately 1% of their preprocedural volumes.
Table 3:
Hemorrhagic complications in 38 sbAVMs with obliteration of draining vein
Complication | Embolization | Completea | Subtotal (Near Completea) | Partial |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hemorrhage | 0 | 2 (0) | 3 | |
No hemorrhage | 8 | 8 (4) | 17 |
Note:—χ2 test.
P < .05, significant difference.
After embolization, there were 13 transient neurologic deficits (9 were ischemia and 4 were hemorrhage), 9 persistent neurologic deficits (7 ischemia and 2 hemorrhage), and 1 death occurred (hemorrhage) (Table 4). Eloquent cortex location was the main risk factor of symptomatic cerebral ischemia and ischemic persistent neurologic deficit (5/7, 71.4%) after embolization (P < .05). The number of catheterized feeders and the volume of embolic agent were not significantly correlated with postprocedural complications (P > .05).
Table 4:
Complications of embolization in 130 patients with sbAVMs
Complications | No. (%) |
---|---|
TND | |
Ischemic | 9 (6.92%) |
Hemorrhagic | 4 (3.08%) |
PND | |
Ischemic | 7 (5.38%) |
Hemorrhagic | 2 (1.54%) |
Death | |
Hemorrhagic | 1 (0.77%) |
Note:—TND indicates transient neurologic deficit; PND, persistent neurologic deficit.
By univariate analyses (Table 5), eloquent cortex location (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.08–3.42) and exclusive deep venous drainage (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.28–9.67) were correlated with postprocedural complications (P < .05). Eloquent cortical location was associated with persistent ischemic neurologic deficit (P < .05); occlusion of the drainage vein was significantly correlated with postprocedural hemorrhage in AVMs with subtotal and partial embolization (Table 3). The impact of eloquent cortical location (P = .001) and exclusive deep venous drainage (P = .035) on embolization complications were demonstrated by backward conditional logistic regression.
Table 5:
Demographic, clinical, and angioarchitectural characteristics predictive for embolization complications by univariate analysis
Characteristics | OR (95% CI) | P Value |
---|---|---|
Sex | ||
Male | 0.84 (0.33–2.10) | .75 |
Age, y | ||
<18 | 0.89 (0.31–2.41) | .78 |
18–49 | 1.09 (0.37–2.76) | .84 |
≥50 | 1.16 (0.17–11.36) | 1.01 |
Initial presentation | ||
Hemorrhage | 1.15 (0.59–2.94) | .49 |
Ischemia | 0.65 (0.14–3.27) | 1.00 |
Headache | 1.86 (0.93–5.63) | .57 |
Seizures | 0.64 (0.37–2.00) | .55 |
No symptoms | 0.91 (0.17–4.39) | .70 |
Location | ||
Eloquent cortex | 2.57 (1.08–3.42) | .02 |
Noneloquent cortex | 0.38 (0.24–0.86) | .02 |
Midline | 0.55 (0.19–2.42) | .79 |
Deep | 1.41 (0.29–2.85) | .51 |
Size | ||
≤3 cm | 1.06 (0.42–2.40) | .79 |
3–6 cm | 0.80 (0.33–1.29) | .23 |
≥6 cm | 2.45 (0.57–5.32) | .17 |
No. of feeders | ||
1 | 0.39 (0.06–1.54) | .38 |
2 | 1.75 (0.76–3.21) | .26 |
≥3 | 0.85 (0.47–3.84) | .72 |
Classification of feeders | ||
Terminal | 0.61 (0.35–1.97) | .32 |
Perforating | 1.64 (0.79–4.58) | .25 |
No. of draining veins | ||
1 | 0.73 (0.43–2.96) | .98 |
2 | 1.57 (0.58–3.63) | .34 |
≥3 | 0.62 (0.34–1.89) | .43 |
Drainage classification | ||
Exclusive superficial | 1.04 (0.77–2.52) | .90 |
Exclusive deep | 4.56 (1.28–9.67) | .00 |
Combined | 0.24 (0.09–0.53) | .03 |
Venous morphology | ||
Venous reflux | 1.91 (0.51–2.98) | .77 |
Venous ectasia | 2.24 (1.32–9.88) | .26 |
Venous stenosis | 1.50 (0.26–2.34) | .19 |
Coexisting aneurysm | ||
Intranidal | 0.99 (0.23–3.81) | .22 |
Perinidal | 1.52 (3.72–8.50) | .61 |
Spetzler-Martin classification | ||
I–II | 2.32 (0.21–9.87) | .48 |
III | 0.58 (0.70–4.05) | .54 |
IV | 1.61 (1.22–4.53) | 1.20 |
V | 0.83 (0.06–10.29) | 1.00 |
Embolization degree | ||
Complete | 0.87 (0.27–3.02) | .27 |
Subtotal | 0.71 (0.40–1.60) | .13 |
Partial | 1.92 (1.21–4.07) | .17 |
Venous occlusion | 1.26 (0.94–2.83) | .84 |
Spetzler-Martin classification of 130 sbAVMs significantly changed after embolization (Table 6), with significantly more patients in grade I than before the procedure (33.33% versus 16.31%, P < .05), and patients in other grades decreased. There were significantly more patients with an mRS of 0 and fewer patients with an mRS of 1 after embolization (Table 6), partly attributed to the recovery from their initial hemorrhage or ischemic event.
Table 6:
Spetzler-Martin classification and mRS score before and after embolization in 130 patients with sbAVMs
Grade | Preprocedural, No. (%) | Postprocedural, No. (%) |
---|---|---|
Spetzler-Martin classification | ||
I | 16 (16.31%) | 34 (33.33%)a |
II | 34 (26.15%) | 20 (19.61%) |
III | 36 (27.69%) | 28 (27.45%) |
IV | 30 (23.08%) | 16 (15.69%) |
V | 14 (10.77%) | 4 (3.92%) |
mRS | ||
0 | 10 (7.69%) | 29 (22.31%)a |
1 | 79 (60.77%) | 54 (41.54%)a |
2 | 19 (14.62%) | 20 (15.38%) |
3 | 11 (8.46%) | 11 (8.46%) |
4 | 5 (3.85%) | 12 (9.23%) |
5 | 6 (4.62%) | 3 (2.31%) |
6 | 0 (0%) | 1 (0.77%) |
Note:—χ2 test.
P < .05, significant difference.
Discussion
Endovascular embolization is an important part of the multimodality treatment for brain AVMs.11–13 Improvements in microcatheter technology and embolic agents, especially n-BCA and EVOH, have led to an increased curative rate of brain AVMs.5,6,11 Furthermore, embolization can reduce the size and flow of AVMs, improving the safety and efficacy of microsurgery and radiosurgical treatment for brain AVMs.14–18 In this series of 130 sbAVMs that underwent embolization for the first time, there was complete embolization in 28 patients (21.54%) and subtotal embolization in 26 patients (20%). In addition to the cases of complete obliteration of brain AVMs, patients in Spetzler-Martin grade I increased significantly after embolization (preprocedural, 16.31% versus postprocedural, 33.33%; P < .05) and the average Spetzler-Martin grade in the series declined (preprocedural, 2.94 versus postprocedural, 1.86; P < .05).
Either curative or adjuvant embolization can result in postprocedural hemorrhage and ischemia. Recent studies reported morbidity ranging from 3–11%, and mortality from 0–4%,2,4,5,7,8,11,19–26 with associations to angioarchitecture, embolic agents, microcatheters, and the manipulator's skills. Studies on different embolization materials, such as silk,24 polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and coil,25 Onyx,11 and n-BCA,23 showed 1.4%, 13%, 19.5%, and 50% rates for morbidity and 0%, 0%, 2.9%, and 1.9% for rates of mortality, respectively. Frizzel and Fisher27 reviewed 32 series of brain AVM embolization studies and revealed that permanent neurologic deficit and mortality were 9% and 2% before 1990, decreasing to 8% and 1% after 1990. Because some embolic agents such as PVA and isobutyl cyanoacrylate are no longer in use and new materials such as Onyx have been widely adopted, the complications of embolization should be reassessed. Moreover, the statistical bias caused by different embolic materials, different locations of AVMs, and technical-related complications need to be evaluated. We reviewed 11 series of embolization by use of n-BCA and Onyx (Table 7)2,4,5,7,8,11,19–22 and retrospectively studied sbAVMs treated by flow-directed microcatheters and liquid embolic agents in 5 recent years. We found a complication rate of 6.4–21%, permanent neurologic deficit of 1.6–12.2%, and mortality rate of 0–2.9%.
Table 7:
Embolization complications by n-BCA and/or Onyx according to the literature (11 series)
Series [Reference] | Patients | Materials | Complication, % | PND, % | Mortality, % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Taylor et al [2] | 201 | n-BCA/Onyx | 21 | 11 | 2 |
Van Rooij et al [4] | 44 | Onyx | 13.8 | 4.6 | 2.3 |
Katsaridis et al [5] | 101 | Onyx | 14.9 | 7.9 | 2.9 |
Ledezma et al [7] | 168 | n-BCA | 16.1 | 6.5 | 1.2 |
Haw et al [8] | 306 | n-BCA | 6.4 | 3.9 | 0 |
Panagiotopoulos et al [11] | 82 | Onyx | 19.5 | 3.8 | 2.4 |
Jayaraman et al [19] | 192 | n-BCA/Onyx | 15.7 | 1.6 | 0 |
Starke et al [20] | 275 | n-BCA | 14 | 2.5 | 0 |
Hauck et al [21] | 107 | Onyx | 17 | 12.2 | 0 |
Velat et al [22] | 88 | n-BCA/Onyx | 13.6 | 4.5 | 2.2 |
Present study | 130 | Onyx | 17.7 | 6.9 | 0.8 |
Note:—PND indicates persistent neurologic deficit.
Complications of embolization can be categorized into technical-related and non–technical-related. Technical-related complications included vascular perforation, normal branch occlusion, and bleeding caused by catheter removal. Recent improvement in flow-directed microcatheter and nonadhesive embolic agents has reduced the risk of microcatheter delivery and removal. In our series with sbAVM embolization, contrast extravasation was noted in 3 cases during the procedure. None of these 3 patients ended with persistent neurologic deficit because of timely occlusion of microperforation sites. The technical-related complication rate in the present study was 2.31%, less than the results of Ledezma et al7 and less than our non–technical-related complications (21/130, 16.15%).
Non–technical-related complications are mainly associated with angioarchitectural characteristics of brain AVMs. Periprocedural hemorrhage rate was 3–15%,28–30 probably related to hemodynamic changes and alteration in nidus pressure.30,31 Picard et al28 demonstrated that venous outflow obstruction was correlated with hemorrhagic presentation after embolization. Furthermore, by progressively blocking draining veins in an AVM model, Hademenos and Massoud32 revealed that venous stenosis or occlusion would result in redistribution of blood flow in the nidus and cause intranidal hypertension. Nonetheless, not all venous occlusion resulted in hemorrhage; the extent and severity of outflow obstruction matter as well. In the present study, venous occlusion occurred in 29.23% of all 130 cases and did not correlate with embolization complications in the univariate model. In the 38 patients with venous occlusion, no postprocedural hemorrhagic presentation occurred when the AVM was completely or nearly completely embolized, whereas a significantly higher hemorrhage rate was seen in the subtotal and partial embolization group (0% versus 23.81%, P < .05). This result suggested that imbalance between inflow and outflow could be a predictive factor of postprocedural hemorrhage and that to avoid rupture of the residual AVM, sbAVMs should be completely or nearly completely embolized as soon as possible when venous outflow obstruction is identified.
Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough related to disruption of cerebral vascular autoregulation33 and delayed venous thrombosis have been postulated as the etiologies of periprocedural hemorrhage. There was no normal perfusion pressure breakthrough in our series because blood pressure was tightly controlled in all patients immediately after embolization. One patient with subtotal embolization (and reserved draining veins) had severe brain edema, which could be attributed to delayed venous thrombosis and stagnation. Purdy et al30 suggested that delayed venous outflow obstruction might occur because of sluggish blood flow rather than direct venous occlusion by embolic agents.
Although hemorrhage results in poorer outcome, ischemic events were the most common complications of AVM embolization.2,4,5,7,8,11,19–22 Sixteen patients (12.31%) in our series had cerebral infarction after embolization, with persistent neurologic deficits in 7 patients. Because of rapid shunting and complex angioarchitecture, perinidal or intranidal normal arteries were very difficult to identify, and neurologic deficits could result from occlusion of these arteries. The present study revealed that sbAVMs located in eloquent cortices had a significantly higher rate of postprocedural persistent ischemic neurologic dysfunction.
In addition to AVM location, other angioarchitectural characteristics that contribute to nonmanipulated complications of embolization remain controversial.2,7,8,19,20,34–37 Haw et al8 reviewed 306 consecutive patients and 513 embolization sessions from 1984–2002 at the University of Toronto and suggested that the factors associated with complications included the presence of a high-flow fistula or fistulous component to the nidus, eloquent cortex involvement, or venous glue embolization. The long interval of data collection (1984–2002) could have undermined the validity of these conclusions because significant advancement in the embolization technique occurred during this time period. Among all angiographic parameters investigated in 168 consecutive patients and 295 embolization sessions, Ledezma et al7 found that Spetzler-Martin grades III–V were significantly associated with unfavorable outcomes and embolization complications. Gobin et al38 revealed that embolization complications were 0% (grade II), 5% (grade III), 15% (grade IV), and 22% (grade V) in their 125 patients studied on Spetzler-Martin classification. On the other hand, studies of Hartmann et al36 and Kim et al10 failed to demonstrate the correlation between Spetzler-Martin grade and embolization complication and found that embolization sessions were the primary factor for postprocedural complications.
To eliminate the statistical bias caused by embolization sessions, we studied the complications of first-time embolization of 130 sbAVMs and demonstrated that postprocedural complications were associated with eloquent cortical location (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.08–3.42) and exclusive deep venous drainage (OR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.28–9.67) but not with Spetzler-Martin classification in univariate and multivariate models. The result suggested that the required multiple sessions in large AVMs but not the AVM size itself might be associated with procedural complications.10,36 The higher complication rate in sbAVMs with exclusive deep venous drainage could be related to the relative lack of a collateral drainage pathway, making them prone to venous outflow obstruction by embolic agents. This observation may also be confounded by the deep location of these AVMs. Thus, sbAVMs with functional cortex and exclusive deep venous drainage would be more difficult to treat and would be at greater risk for embolization complications than the other types of sbAVMs.
Conclusions
Embolization is a safe treatment technique for supratentorial AVM, with the development of flow-directed microcatheters and liquid embolic agents. Eloquent cortical location and exclusive deep venous drainage were significantly associated with embolization complications, and venous outflow occlusion in cases with subtotal and partial embolization might be a predictive factor for periprocedural hemorrhage.
ABBREVIATIONS:
- sbAVM
supratentorial brain arteriovenous malformation
- EVOH
ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer
- PVA
polyvinyl alcohol
References
- 1. Chang SD, Marcellus ML, Marks MP, et al. Multimodality treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 2003;53:1–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Taylor CL, Dutton K, Rappard G, et al. Complications of preoperative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 2004;100:810–12 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Izawa M, Chernov M, Hayashi M, et al. Combined management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with embolization and gamma knife radiosurgery: comparative evaluation of the long-term results. Surg Neurol 2009;71:43–53 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Van Rooij WJ, Sluzewski M, Beute GN. Brain AVM embolization with Onyx. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:172–77 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Katsaridis V, Papagiannaki C, Aimar E. Curative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with Onyx in 101 patients. Neuroradiology 2008;50:589–97 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Pan JW, Zhou HJ, Zhan RY, et al. Supratentorial brain AVM embolization with Onyx-18 and post-embolization management: a single-center experience. Intervent Neuroradiol 2009;15:275–82 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Ledezma CJ, Hoh BL, Carter BS, et al. Complications of cerebral arteriovenous malformation embolization: multivariate analysis of predictive factors. Neurosurgery 2006;58:602–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Haw CS, terBrugge K, Willinsky R, et al. Complications of embolization of arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg 2006;104:226–32 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Cockroft KM, Hwang SK, Rosenwasser RH. Endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: indications, techniques, outcome, and complications. Neurosurg Clin North Am 2005;16:367–80 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Kim LJ, Albuquerque FC, Spetzler RF, et al. Postembolization neurological deficits in cerebral arteriovenous malformations: stratification by arteriovenous malformation grade. Neurosurgery 2006;58:53–59 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Panagiotopoulos V, Gizewski E, Asgari S, et al. Embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:99–106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Ogilvy CS, Stieg PE, Awad I, et al. AHA Scientific Statement: recommendations for the management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the Stroke Council. Stroke 2001;32:1458–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Viñuela F, Duckwiler G, Guglielmi G. Contribution of interventional neuroradiology in the therapeutic management of brain arteriovenous malformations. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 1997;6:268–71 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Hartmann A, Mast H, Mohr JP, et al. Determinants of staged endovascular and surgical treatment outcome of brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 2005;36:2431–35 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Morgan MK, Zurin AA, Harrington T, et al. Changing role for preoperative embolisation in the management of arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Clin Neurosci 2000;7:527–30 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Martin NA, Khanna R, Doberstein C, et al. Therapeutic embolization of arteriovenous malformations: the case for and against. Clin Neurosurg 2000;46:295–318 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Viñuela F, Dion JE, Duckwiler G, et al. Combined endovascular embolization and surgery in the management of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: experience with 101 cases. J Neurosurg 1991;75:856–64 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Weber W, Kis B, Siekmann R, et al. Preoperative embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with Onyx. Neurosurgery 2007;61:244–52 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jayaraman MV, Marcellus ML, Hamilton S, et al. Neurologic complications of arteriovenous malformation embolization using liquid embolic agents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:242–46 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Otten ML, et al. Adjuvant embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate in the treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: outcomes, complications, and predictors of neurologic deficits. Stroke 2009;40:2783–90 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Hauck EF, Welch BG, White JA, et al. Preoperative embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with Onyx. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:492–95 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Velat GJ, Reavey-Cantwell JF, Sistrom C, et al. Comparison of N-butyl cyanoacrylate and Onyx for the embolization of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: analysis of fluoroscopy and procedure times. Neurosurgery 2008;63:ONS73–78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. NBCA Trial Investigators. N-butyl cyanoacrylate embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: results of a prospective, randomized, multi-center trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:748–55 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Schmutz F, McAuliffe W, Anderson DM, et al. Embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations with silk: histopathologic changes and hemorrhagic complications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;18:1233–37 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Mathis JA, Barr JD, Horton JA, et al. The efficacy of particulate embolization combined with stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of large arteriovenous malformations of the brain. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1995;16:299–306 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Deruty R, Pelissou-Guyotat I, Amat D, et al. Complications after multidisciplinary treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1996;138:119–31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Frizzel RT, Fisher WS, 3rd. Cure, morbidity, and mortality associated with embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations: a review of 1246 patients in 32 series over a 35-year period. Neurosurgery 1995;37:1031–39 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Picard L, DaCosta E, Anxionnat R, et al. Acute spontaneous hemorrhage after embolization of brain arteriovenous malformation with N-butyl cyanoacrylate. J Neuroradiol 2001;28:147–65 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jafar JJ, Davis AJ, Berenstein A, et al. The effect of embolization with N-butyl cyanoacrylate prior to surgical resection of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1993;78:60–69 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Purdy PD, Batjer HH, Samson DS. Management of hemorrhagic complications from preoperative embolization of arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1991;74:205–11 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Massoud TF, Hademenos GJ, Young WL, et al. Can induction of systemic hypotension help prevent nidus rupture complicating arteriovenous malformation embolization? Analysis of underlying mechanism achieved using a theoretical model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1255–67 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Hademenos GJ, Massoud TF. Risk of intracranial arteriovenous malformation rupture due to venous drainage impairment: a theoretical analysis. Stroke 1996;27:1072–83 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Spetzler RF, Wilson CB, Weinstein P, et al. Normal perfusion pressure breakthrough theory. Clin Neurosurg 1978;25:651–72 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Heidenreich JO, Hartlieb S, Stendel R, et al. Bleeding complications after endovascular therapy of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:313–16 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Debrun GM, Aletich V, Ausman JI, et al. Embolization of the nidus of brain arteriovenous malformations with n-butyl cyanoacrylate. Neurosurgery 1997;40:112–20 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Hartmann A, Pile-Spellman J, Stapf C, et al. Risk of endovascular treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 2002;33:1816–20 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Lawton MT. Spetzler-Martin grade III arteriovenous malformations: surgical results and a modification of the grading scale. Neurosurgery 2003;52:740–48 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Gobin YP, Laurent A, Merienne L, et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization and radiosurgery. J Neurosurg 1996;85:19–28 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]