Skip to main content
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2021 Mar 16;12:1686. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21934-6

Ligand assisted growth of perovskite single crystals with low defect density

Ye Liu 1,2, Xiaopeng Zheng 2, Yanjun Fang 2, Ying Zhou 1, Zhenyi Ni 1, Xun Xiao 1, Shangshang Chen 1, Jinsong Huang 1,
PMCID: PMC7966356  PMID: 33727538

Abstract

A low defect density in metal halide perovskite single crystals is critical to achieve high performance optoelectronic devices. Here we show the reduction of defect density in perovskite single crystals grown by a ligand-assisted solution process with 3‐(decyldimethylammonio)‐propane‐sulfonate inner salt (DPSI) as an additive. DPSI ligands anchoring with lead ions on perovskite crystal surfaces not only suppress nucleation in solution, but also regulate the addition of proper ions to the growing surface, which greatly enhances the crystal quality. The grown CH3NH3PbI3 crystals show better crystallinity and a 23-fold smaller trap density of 7 × 1010 cm−3 than the optimized control crystals. The enhanced material properties result in significantly suppressed ion migration and superior X-ray detection sensitivity of CH3NH3PbI3 detectors of (2.6 ± 0.4) × 106 µC Gy−1air cm−2 for 60 kVp X-ray and the lowest detectable dose rate reaches (5.0 ± 0.7) nGy s−1, which enables reduced radiation dose to patients in medical X-ray diagnostics.

Subject terms: Materials for devices, Optical materials and structures


The performance of a metal halide perovskite single crystal is governed by the defect density. Here, the authors report a high quality single crystal perovskite grown by a ligand-assisted solution process with DPSI achieving 23-fold smaller trap density than that without DPSI.

Introduction

Metal halide perovskite (MHP) has become a rising star semiconductor candidate for ionizing radiation detection, due to its superior and unique optoelectronic properties, such as large carrier mobility, long carrier recombination lifetime1,2, high defect tolerance3, and high stopping power to ionization radiation46. Perovskite single crystals are an important set of materials not only as the platform for the study of their intrinsic physical properties7, but also to achieve record-performance devices such as solar cells8, photodetector9, and ionization radiation detectors6,10. Single crystals have shown better physical properties than polycrystalline materials such as larger mobility, longer recombination lifetime, less ion diffusion11, less un-intentional doping12, and better stability13, which are contributed to the absence of extended defects such as grain boundaries as well as the lower point defect density14. To grow MHP single crystals, solution-based methods are still simplest, and low-cost in making perovskite single crystals of different compositions with large quantity. Many efforts have been devoted to grow perovskite single crystals of different compositions and shapes to optimize their device performance. The growth rates of different facets were tailored by choosing the non-stoichiometry of raw material or different solvents, which resulted in the crystals in different shapes1517. Thin crystals with a large aspect ratio were grown on solution/air interface1820 or between two substrates with space confinements21,22. All solution-based single crystal growth methods create supersaturated solution so that solute can precipitate out. Among them, crystal growth through inverse temperature crystallization (ITC) method is particularly attractive, which utilizes the reduced solubility of perovskites in different solutions at a range of higher temperature2325. To obtain large-sized bulk single crystals, the single crystal was carefully transferred as seed to another fresh precursor for multiple cycles26 or using oil to continuously extract solvents27. However, there are much less efforts devoted to enhancing the quality of perovskite single crystals in terms of reducing point defect density, despite it is well known in the community that the crystals quality is important to achieve the best properties and device performance.

In this work, we introduced coordinating organic molecules in perovskite precursor solution as additives to regulate the growth of perovskite single crystals which impact both nucleation and crystal growth processes. The additives with strong interaction to lead ions in perovskites can tune the growth rate of different facets, and more importantly reduce the point defect formation. The obtained single crystals with improved quality showed a smaller defect density by 23 folds, which dramatically suppressed ion migration and improved optoelectronic properties. The application of these high quality CH3NH3PbI3 (MAPbI3) single crystals for medical X-ray detection achieved the record high sensitivity of (2.6 ± 0.4) × 106 µC Gy−1air cm−2 and lowest detectable dose rate of (5.0 ± 0.7) nGy s−1 for 60 kVp X-ray.

Results and discussion

Additive modification of crystal growth

Like any crystal growth process, there is a trade-off between growth speed and crystal quality. A higher growth temperature is beneficial to reduce the crystal defect density, because the precursor ions have a larger diffusion rate so that they can find the right lattice position to stick to. There are always chances that point defects can be generated due to the absence of an ion or a right type of ion showing up at the lattice position, which may cause the formation of point defects like vacancies or antisites, even at high temperature. Reducing crystal growth speed to decrease defect formation is not always an option in applications. Our method of changing crystal growth kinetics and reducing defect density is to introduce some organic molecules which have strong interaction with ions on the surface of perovskite crystals to regulate the addition of precursor ions onto the crystals. Such molecules should have interaction with ions of perovskites to some extent, but the interaction should not be too strong to form primary chemical bonding permanently, which would hinder or terminate crystal growth. This design rule indicates that most organic molecules which are broadly used for defect passivation in perovskite solar cells can act on this role. Here we chose one molecule previously studied for surface passivation on MHP thin film solar cells, 3‐(Decyldimethylammonio)‐propane‐sulfonate inner salt (DPSI), because it not only passivates defects in MHP polycrystalline grains, but also modulates the grain size in the polycrystalline films28. The MAPbI3 single crystals were grown using the ITC method where crystals precipitate from MAPbI3 precursor solutions after they were heated to a growth temperature which is dependent on the precursor concentration25,29. The MAPbI3 single crystal grown from control precursor solution without DPSI was dodecahedral shape, and exposed facets are (100)t and (112)t, where t donates tetragonal phase, as shown in Fig. 1a. After adding 10% molar ratio of DPSI to Pb in the precursor solution, the grown crystals had more cuboid shape with facets of (002)t, (110)t, and (112)t. A single crystal with dimensions of 12.9 mm × 12.6 mm × 3.7 mm was obtained from this precursor with 10% DPSI at 108 °C after growing for 50 h (Fig. 1a). Further increasing the DPSI ratio to 16.3% resulted in disappearance of the higher index plane of (112) and thus completely cuboid shape crystals (Fig. 1a). Here the facets of these crystals were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement, as shown in Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1. The powders diffraction pattern of the MAPbI3 cuboid-shape crystal grown with 16.3 mol% DPSI shows it is still tetragonal phase (Fig. 1b). It is noted that the required nucleation temperature was 18–20 °C higher, while the growth temperature only needed 8 °C higher after pre-seeding to reach the same growth rate (Supplementary Fig. 2). To test whether this method is general in controlling crystal growth, DPSI was then added into the single crystal growth of a different composition of MAPbBr3. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 3a, b, DPSI also reduced the growth rate of MAPbBr3, and a higher growth temperature was required for crystal growth with same rate.

Fig. 1. Crystal growth behavior with ligand regulation.

Fig. 1

a Scheme of crystals growing process and conditions, and photographs of the grown crystals. b XRD patterns of the facets of the crystals and powder of the cuboid-shape crystal.

Mechanism of crystal growth using DPSI additive

To understand the interaction of DPSI with perovskites, the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) measurements were conducted after mixing MAPbI3 and DPSI. In Fig. 2a, for pristine DPSI powder (after vacuum drying), the peaks of the sulfonic acid group at 1030 cm−1, 1039 cm−1 were observed30,31. The two peaks are assigned as S–O- (1030 cm−1) and S = O (1039 cm−1) in -SO3 group of DPSI. To further understand the interaction between DPSI and MAPbI3, FTIR characterization was also applied onto the mixtures of the PbI2:DPSI, MAI:DPSI and MAPbI3:DPSI, respectively, which were prepared by dissolving them in solvents and drying the solution. The peak shifts of -SO3 group in FTIR spectra of the three samples were compared with that of pristine DPSI powder. A fitted peak of 1047 cm−1 in MAI:DPSI sample suggests that MA+ forms hydrogen bond with S = O in DPSI. For PbI2:DPSI sample, the S–O- peak of DPSI red-shifted, and it can be fitted into two new peaks of 1018 cm−1 and 1024 cm−1, which indicates there are more than one interaction scenarios of Pb2+ with S–O-. The shifting of S = O from 1039 cm−1 to 1054 cm−1 suggests a coordination interaction of the lone pair electrons of oxygen in S = O with Pb. The S–O- peak in MAPbI3:DPSI is dominantly by the red-shifted 1030 cm−1 peak, and the main fitted peaks are still 1018 cm−1 and 1024 cm−1, which are caused by the interaction of S-O- with Pb2+. The hydrogen bonds of S = O in DPSI with MA are almost negligible and the ionic bonding of -SO3 with Pb2+ dominates the interaction of DPSI and MAPbI3, as illustrated in Fig. 2b.

Fig. 2. Mechanism of crystal growth with DPSI.

Fig. 2

a FTIR spectra of the powders of MAI, PbI2, and MAPbI3 with 10 mol% DPSI. b Scheme of DPSI absorption difference on different crystal facets which have different Pb2+ density. c Scheme of crystal growth mechanism at the surface of crystal where the DPSI molecules modulate the diffusion of metal ions to reach the perovskite surface.

The strong interaction of the S–O- group of DPSI with Pb2+ indicates that the surfaces of perovskite crystals in solution can be wrapped by DPSI. The steric hindrance effect from the long -(CH2)n- chain of the DPSI, working as the polymer brushes with a thickness of 1-2 nm32, would hinder the diffusion of ions to the perovskite surfaces for attachment, as illustrated in Fig. 2c. The hindrance effect of DPSI would change the growth rate of different facets33,34. We calculated the Pb atom density at different facets. As shown in Table 1, Pb atom density on (110)t and (002)t is largest, and thus these facet would grow slower and survive. The suppression of crystal growth at (110)t and (002)t facets were directly observed when DPSI was added with different weight percentages into the precursor solution after seeding with regular dodecahedral-shaped crystals (Supplementary Fig. 2a). The (112) facet with a lower density of Pb ions would grow much faster, eventually resulting in its disappearance (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Fig. 2a)35 To maintain the same crystal growth rate, the crystal growth temperature needed to be increased from 88 °C to 96 °C, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 2b. We speculate that an elevated temperature would also enhance the dynamic detaching of DPSI to the perovskite surfaces, which allows more solute ions to diffuse and attach to crystal surfaces, as illustrated in Fig. 2c. The increased crystal growth temperature also enhanced the diffusion rate of ions in the precursor solution, which allows the right ions to be delivered timely to the surface lattice position and thus reduces the defect density in the grown single crystals36,37. This could not be achieved by simply enhancing the crystal growth temperature in regular precursors without DPSI, because an increased temperature generally causes the formation of a larger quantity of nucleus everywhere in the solution. A too large density of nucleus in solution would quickly consume the solute in the solution, and they would attach to other growing crystals, which prevents the crystals growing into large size, as demonstrated by the growth of MAPbBr3 in Supplementary Fig. 3a. Therefore, another main function of DPSI is to suppress the nucleation, as evidenced by the less crystals in the solution with DPSI in Supplementary Fig. 3). Since the temperature needs to be 20 °C (for MAPbI3 with DPSI) higher than normal to reach the same nucleation rate, while the same crystal growth rate can be achieved by increasing temperature by only 8 °C. DPSI additive enables a new crystal growth temperature window to achieve the same growth rate but with suppressed nucleation. Finally, the interaction of Pb2+ or undercoordinated-Pb with DPSI also introduces an energy barrier for the diffusing ions for further crystal growth. Only if the binding energy of incoming species with Pb is stronger than Pb-DPSI under high growth temperature, such as IPb bonding, DPSI would be replaced and the crystal can keep growing. This mechanism can effectively increase the diffusion barrier and the defect formation energy to reduce the possibility of bonding or stacking of wrong ions.

Table 1.

Calculated atomic area density in different facets of typical MAPbI3 crystals in tetragonal phase.

Facets Pb atomic density (atoms Å−2) I atomic density (atoms Å−2)
{002}t 0.02548 0.05096
{110}t 0.02522 0.05044
{100}t 0.01824 0.01824
{112}t 0.01793 0.01793

High quality single crystals

The changed crystal growth kinetics of MAPbI3 single crystal grown with DPSI additive should also affect the crystal crystallinity. To investigate whether DPSI introduces a crystallinity difference, we conducted X-ray rocking curve measurements on these crystals. Here nine samples from each type of crystals were studied for a statistical comparison. The photographs of some crystals with DPSI in different size are shown in Supplementary Fig. 4. As shown in Fig. 3a, the average full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the rocking curve for (002) facet was 0.0289° for the crystals grown with DPSI, while that value was 0.1650° for the crystals grown without additives, and its distribution is also much broader (insert of Fig. 3a). This small FWHM of 0.0199° for the champion crystal grown with DPSI almost reached the resolution of our equipment, and is among the best quality MAPbI3 single crystals reported so far. Such a sharp rocking curve for the MAPbI3 single crystals grown with DPSI confirmed that the crystallinity has been dramatically improved. Normally the crystal with improved crystallinity will has a lower defect density. We then measured the charge trap density caused by defects using drive-level capacitance profile (DLCP) technique, which was recently shown to characterize the spatial distribution of defect densities in perovskite single crystals14. Figure 3b shows the depth dependent trap densities for deep traps with a depth of > 0.43 eV from the top surface (C60/MAPbI3 interface) to the interior for the as-grown crystals without any surface treatment. It is noted these crystals still have a large density of defects at very top surfaces, because there was some precursor residual on the crystal surfaces when the crystals were removed out of precursor solution. The trap density at the interior of MAPbI3 crystals grown with DPSI reached 7 × 1010 cm−3, which is the smallest directly measured trap density among all perovskite single crystals reported in literature. The deep trap density in the MAPbI3 crystals grown with DPSI is about 23 times smaller than the control MAPbI3 crystal, directly proves that DPSI additive can reduce the defect density in the single crystals. This shows that high-quality single crystals with reproducible good crystallinity can be obtained without sacrificing the growth rate. The presence of charge traps would generally cause a frequency dependent noise (pink or 1/f noise with a high noise a low frequency) due to the charge trapping and detrapping process3840. To evaluate the impact of the reduced defect trap density on the device noise, we directly measured it by a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) signal analyzer and a low noise current preamplifier within the frequency range from 0.5 Hz to 150 Hz at bias of −10 V. Figure 3c shows that the noise current of the crystal grown with DPSI was almost independent of frequency, which again supports the very low defect density in the crystal.

Fig. 3. Material and electronic characterization of MAPbI3 crystals.

Fig. 3

a X-ray rocking curves for MAPbI3 single crystals grown w/o and with DPSI, and the statistical FWHM results are shown as the insert. b Trap density profiled by DLCP for the crystals at different profiling distance from top surface. c Noise current of the crystal grown with DPSI. d, e Time of flight transient currents of the crystals grown w/o and with DPSI. f Photoconductivity comparison of the crystal w/o and with DPSI under weak ambient light intensity of 1 × 10−4 W cm−2.

The hole carrier mobility of the MAPbI3 crystals was also compared by time of flight (TOF) method. As shown in Fig. 3d, e, the hole carrier mobility in MAPbI3 crystal grown with DPSI was largely improved from 72 cm2 V−1 s−1 to 112 cm2 V−1 s−1. We also compared the MAPbBr3 single crystals to see if DPSI can also improve crystal quality. As shown in Supplementary Fig. 5, the hole mobility of the MAPbBr3 crystal with DPSI was slightly increased from 132 cm2 V−1 s−1 to 144 cm2 V−1 s−1, while the electron carrier mobility increased dramatically from 65 cm2 V−1 s−1 to 224 cm2 V−1 s−1. The carrier mobility-lifetime product (µτ) was derived by fitting the photocurrent of the MAPbI3 devices with modified Hecht equation. As shown in Fig. 3f, the µτ of MAPbI3 crystal was enhanced from 8.4 × 10−3 cm2 V−1 to 1.3 × 10−2 cm2 V−1 after growth with DPSI under ambient light with an intensity of 1 × 10−4 W cm−2, one of the highest reported values for MHPs.

It is noted that not all defects cause electronic charge traps, and some structural defects may cause doping or facilitate ion migration12,14. The iodine-based MHP materials are promising candidates in X-ray detection, due to the high atomic number, large attenuation coefficient, and high photogenerated carrier density6,41. However, the most widely studied MHPs for X-ray radiation detectors were mainly bromine-based compositions for their low noise level4245. Iodine-based perovskites were reported to have low resistivity and obvious ion migration under bias6,46. Ion migration-related current drift or polarization effect has been a major concern for the application of MHPs for radiation detection. It is noted that the fastest ion migration occurs through point defects or extended defects. We thus speculate the perovskite single crystals with a much low defect density should be much more stable under electric field. To evaluate the stability and quality improvement of the single crystal by adding DPSI, we applied a bias for an elongated time to track the dark current drift43, since dark current drift has been shown to be a good indicator of ion migration or polarization effect in many type of single crystal materials47,48. The as-grown MAPbI3 single crystals with DPSI have been fabricated into detector devices with guard ring42 and the structure of Cr (20 nm) /MAPbI3/C60 (30 nm)/ bathocuproine (BCP, 8 nm)/Cr (20 nm). As shown in Supplementary Fig. 6 and Supplementary Table 1, the dark current drift of these high-quality crystals without any surface treatment or passivation under different electric field reached 3.72 ± 2.23 × 10−5 nA cm−1 v−1 s−1, which represents the lowest dark-current drift for iodine-based MHP devices. Since surface defects still exist at the perovskite crystal surface, as suggested by DLCP results, we further polished all MAPbI3 single crystals to remove the surface residuals and treated the exposed surface with (C8H17NH3)2SO4 solution for ~2 s at room temperature. And then the crystals were annealed at 50 °C for 5 min, which induces the formation of a robust, wide bandgap oxysalt to passivate the crystal surface dangling bonds49. These treatments can slow down the surface degradation under bias which would otherwise cause electrochemical reaction of perovskite with metal electrodes. Device structure of the crystals after surface treatments is shown in Fig. 4a. As shown in Fig. 4b, the crystal grown with DPSI is not only more intrinsic due to the smaller dark current of ~48 nA (dark current density of 120 nA cm−2) under a field of 270 V cm−1, but also shows more than 10 times less dark current drift than pristine crystal during 1 h continuous test (Fig. 4a). The dark current density drift of the MAPbI3 crystal device with DPSI under such a high bias was 1.2 × 10−5 nA cm−1 v−1 s−1 (Table 2), which is comparable to the best reported inorganic perovskites Cs2AgBiBr6 device43. It is known that I- ions are much more mobile than Br ions50, therefore the small dark current drift in MAPbI3 crystal devices indicates a significant smaller iodine-related defect density. The resistivity of the MAPbI3 crystal detector with DPSI under different electric field was measured to be 1.95 ± 0.35 × 109 Ω cm (Table 2), which is among the highest of iodide-based perovskite and also suggests their low defect density, since defect can cause self-doping14,51,52.

Fig. 4. X-ray detection performance.

Fig. 4

a Device structure scheme and a photo of the as-fabricated device. b Dark current density of the crystals under a same electric field of 270 V cm-1 at ambient air without encapsulation. The crystals were both polished and passivated by oxysalt. The thickness of the crystal with DPSI here is 3.7 mm, and the applied bias was −100 V. c Device output current under 60 kVp X-ray of different dose rate with noise limit. d Device output current under 100 kVp and 120 kVp X-rays. This crystal thickness is 2.4 mm, and the applied bias was −100 V.

Table 2.

Dark current drift and resistivity result of the MAPbI3 crystal with DPSI after surface treatment in Fig. 4b.

Reverse bias (V) Electric field (V cm−1) Dark current (nA cm−2) Resistivity (Ω cm) Current drift (nA cm−1 v−1 s−1)
5 13.5 8.7 1.55 × 109 1.6 × 10−6
10 27 15.6 1.73 × 109 6.58 × 10−6
20 54 34.5 1.56 × 109 1.3 × 10−5
100 270 120 2.25 × 109 1.2 × 10−5

Application of crystals for X-ray detection

Finally, we measured the X-ray detection performance using these high-quality MAPbI3 crystals. Firstly, the X-ray detector based on the crystal of Fig. 4b with DPSI has shown excellent sensitivity of 2.1 × 105 µC Gy−1air cm−2 with lowest detectable dose rate of 2.34 nGy s−1 under soft X-ray energy with 8 keV (Supplementary Fig. 7). However, in medical imaging, hard X-rays with energy above 60 kVp are mostly used for a high penetration capability, so the hard X-rays with energy of 60 kVp, 100 kVp and 120 kVp were used in this study with their simulated energy spectrum shown in Supplementary Fig. 8. Under bias of −100 V on a crystal with thickness of 2.4 mm (electric field of 417 V cm−1), the dark current was measured about 81 nA (current density of 2.71 × 103 nA cm−2) with 4.7 × 10−5 nA cm−1 v−1 s−1 drifted under continuous tracking. This detector delivered high sensitivities of 2.9 × 106 µC Gy−1air cm−2 for 60 kVp X-ray (Fig. 4c), 6.01 × 105 µC Gy−1air cm−2 for 100 kVp X-ray, and 1.04 × 106 µC Gy−1air cm−2 for 120 kVp (Fig. 4d). The lowest detectable dose rate for 60 kVp X-ray reached 5.7 nGy s−1 (Fig. 4c). This is among the best X-ray detection performances in all MHP crystal detectors regardless of compositions, as summarized in Supplementary Table 2. The low noise of these high quality MAPbI3 single crystals allows them to compete with bromine-based and low-dimension MHPs, such as MAPbBrxCl3-x42, Cs2AgBiBr643, (NH4)3Bi2I9 (2D crystal)44, given that their lower bandgap and higher atomic number of I than Br should allow the generation of a larger density of charge carriers under X-ray.

In this work, we have significantly improved the quality of MAPbI3 single crystals by ligand regulation during crystal growth, with 23 times lower bulk defect density, without sacrificing crystal growth rate. The ion migration under high bias has been successfully suppressed for the first time for iodide perovskites, which is comparable to inorganic perovskites. The crystal detectors achieve ultra-high sensitivity of (2.6 ± 0.4) × 106 µC Gy−1air cm−2 and the lowest detectable dose rate of 5.0 ± 0.7 nGy s−1 to 60 kVp X-ray.

Methods

Materials and crystal growth

The solvents of γ-butyrolactone (GBL, > 99%), N,N-Dimethylformamide (DMF, > 98%), lead bromide (PbBr2, > 98%), BCP (96%), and DPSI were all purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. MAI and MABr powder were purchased from GreatCell Solar. Lead iodide (PbI2, 99.9985%) was purchased from Alfa Aesar. All the MHP single crystals were grown by typical ITC method respectively. C60 ( > 99.5%) was purchased from Nano-C and Cr was purchased from Kurt J. Lesker. For MAPbI3 single crystals in this study, MAI and PbI2 powder were mixed in molar ratio of 1:1 with concentration of 1.5 M in GBL to prepare the same initial precursor solution. For MAPbBr3 single crystals, MABr and PbBr2 powder were mixed in molar ratio of 1:1 with concentration of 1.2 M in DMF to prepare the initial precursor. The oxysalt passivation solution was synthesized with the same method49 and diluted with the concentration of 1 mM in mixed solvents (toluene/isopropanol = 5:1).

Characterizations

XRD patterns were carried out on a Rigaku MiniFlex 6 G system with an X-ray tube at 2.0 kW. This was configured with Cu Kα radiation (wavelength of 1.5418 Å). The medium resolution X-ray rocking curve measurements were conducted by a Rigaku Smartlab X-ray diffractometer equipped with a 3 kW Cu tube at V = 40 kV and I = 44 mA. The parallel beam geometry was applied to achieve medium resolution parallel X-ray source, which is further confined with a 10 mm slit. The step size for omega scan is 0.0001 degree. The FTIR spectra of the powder samples were scanned from 4000 cm−1 to 400 cm−1 and recorded on a PerkinElmer FTIR spectrometer in reflection mode. All the mixture samples of PbI2:DPSI, MAI:DPSI, and MAPbI3:DPSI for FTIR were prepared by drying out their blended solution to study their interactions.

Capacitance measurements

The DLCP measurements were performed by using an Agilent E4980A precision LCR meter. The scanning range of the ac frequency (f) was 0.02–2000 kHz. The demarcation energy Eω=kTlnω0ω (where ω0 is the attempt-to-escape angular frequency that equals to 2πv0T2 is derived from the temperature-dependent Cf measurements. The ν0 is obtained from the fitting of lnT2ω=ETkTln2πv0 obtained at different T. Temperature-dependent capacitance measurements were carried out in a Lake Shore Cryotronics probe stage with a Lake Shore Cryotronics temperature controller model 336. SMA connected cables and ZN50R DC/RF probes that were applicable for RF test up to 1 GHz were equipped with the probe station. Before each measurement, the system was self-calibrated under open-circuit and short-circuit conditions to compensate for any undesired signal from the instrument.

For the DLCP measurements, the dc bias (V) was scanning from 0 V to the VOC (e.g., 1.1 V) for the single crystal detectors. While ac bias (δV) was ranging from 20 to 200 mV. The capacitance measured at each δV was recorded and fitted with a polynomial function C = C0 + C1δV + C2(δV)2 + …to obtain C0 and C1. With the determination of C0 and C1, the total carrier density (N) that includes both free carrier density and trap density at the profiling distance X from the junction barrier is calculated by N=C032qεA2C1, where q is the elementary charge, ε is the dielectric constant of the semiconductor and A is the active area of the junction. The profiling distance from the junction barrier was calculated by εA/C0, which was changed by tuning the V. For each ac bias, an additional offset dc voltage was applied to keep the maximum forward bias constant. The trap density within a certain trap depth range was calculated by subtracting the total carrier density measured at a larger Eω (lower ac frequency) with that measured at a smaller Eω (higher ac frequency).

Time of flight (TOF) measurement

ToF measurement was conducted by illuminating the devices with 4 ns width, 337 nm laser pulses (SRS N2 laser) from the semitransparent electrodes side. The pulse laser-generated photocurrent was recorded using an Agilent 1 GHz digital oscilloscope (Agilent DSO-X 3104 A).

X-ray radiation detection measurement

The continuous X-ray source for 60 kVp, 100 kVp and 120 kVp energy detection measurements was manufactured by YXLON with a 21-mm Al sheet filter and focal spot of 1 mm. The different current of the X-ray source and different thickness of 1100 Aluminum alloy sheets were applied to tune the dose rate values during measurement. The dose rate calibration above 60 nGy s−1 was measured by Raysafe X2 Solo dosimeter and using the same calibration process as our previous work41. The dose rate calibration below 60 nGy s−1 was measured by SOEKS Quantum radiation detector dosimeter same as our previous method42.

Noise current measurement

Noise current was carried out at different frequency by a Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) signal analyzer (Agilent 35670 A) which was connected to a low noise current preamplifier.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (746.5KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

This work involving material growth, characterization and device fabrication and testing is mainly supported by Center for Hybrid Organic Inorganic Semiconductors for Energy (CHOISE), an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Office of Science within the US Department of Energy. The radiation detection research is supported by the Department of the Defense, Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) under award HDTRA1-20-2-0002. The content of the information does not necessarily reflect the position or the policy of the federal government, and no official endorsement should be inferred.

Author contributions

J.H. and Y.L. conceived the idea and designed experiments. Y.L. prepared the MAPbI3 crystal devices and conducted their optoelectronic characterizations and FTIR measurements. X.Z. prepared the MAPbBr3 crystal devices and conducted their TOF measurement. Y.L. and Y.F. were involved in soft X-ray detection measurement. Y.L. and Y.Z. were involved in hard X-ray detection measurement. Y.F. conducted FFT noise current measurement. Z.N. conducted the DLCP measurement. X.X. conducted the XRD and X-ray rocking curve measurements. Y.L. and S.C. analyzed the FTIR results. J.H. and Y.L. wrote the manuscript and all authors reviewed it.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Peer review information Nature Communications thanks Wei Lei, Mingjian Yuan and the other, anonymous, reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-021-21934-6.

References

  • 1.Dong Q, et al. Electron-hole diffusion lengths >175 μm in solution-grown CH3NH3PbI3 single crystals. Science. 2015;347:967–970. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa5760. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Stranks SD, et al. Electron-hole diffusion lengths exceeding 1 micrometer in an organometal trihalide perovskite absorber. Science. 2013;342:341–344. doi: 10.1126/science.1243982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Brandt RE, Stevanović V, Ginley DS, Buonassisi T. Identifying defect-tolerant semiconductors with high minority-carrier lifetimes: beyond hybrid lead halide perovskites. Mrs Commun. 2015;5:265–275. doi: 10.1557/mrc.2015.26. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hunter DM, Belev G, Kasap S, Yaffe MJ. Measured and calculated K‐fluorescence effects on the MTF of an amorphous‐selenium based CCD x‐ray detector. Med. Phys. 2012;39:608–622. doi: 10.1118/1.3673957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zentai, G. et al. In Mercuric iodide and lead iodide x-ray detectors for radiographic and fluoroscopic medical imaging, in Medical Imaging 2003: Physics of Medical Imaging. 77–91 (International Society for Optics and Photonics) (2003).
  • 6.Wei H, Huang J. Halide lead perovskites for ionizing radiation detection. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1066. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08981-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Huang J, Yuan Y, Shao Y, Yan Y. Understanding the physical properties of hybrid perovskites for photovoltaic applications. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017;2:17042. doi: 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.42. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Best research-cell efficiencies charthttps://www.nrel.gov/pv/cell-efficiency.html (2020).
  • 9.Fang Y, Dong Q, Shao Y, Yuan Y, Huang J. Highly narrowband perovskite single-crystal photodetectors enabled by surface-charge recombination. Nat. Photonics. 2015;9:679–686. doi: 10.1038/nphoton.2015.156. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim YC, et al. Printable organometallic perovskite enables large-area, low-dose X-ray imaging. Nature. 2017;550:87–91. doi: 10.1038/nature24032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Shao Y, et al. Grain boundary dominated ion migration in polycrystalline organic–inorganic halide perovskite films. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016;9:1752–1759. doi: 10.1039/C6EE00413J. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Xing J, et al. Ultrafast ion migration in hybrid perovskite polycrystalline thin films under light and suppression in single crystals. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:30484–30490. doi: 10.1039/C6CP06496E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Wang Q, et al. Scaling behavior of moisture-induced grain degradation in polycrystalline hybrid perovskite thin films. Energy Environ. Sci. 2017;10:516–522. doi: 10.1039/C6EE02941H. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ni Z, et al. Resolving spatial and energetic distributions of trap states in metal halide perovskite solar cells. Science. 2020;367:1352–1358. doi: 10.1126/science.aba0893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhang Y, Huang F, Mi Q. Preferential facet growth of methylammonium lead halide single crystals promoted by halide coordination. Chem. Lett. 2016;45:1030–1032. doi: 10.1246/cl.160419. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Ding J, et al. Design growth of MAPbI3 single crystal with (220) facets exposed and its superior optoelectronic properties. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:216–221. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b03020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu M, et al. Unveiling solvent-related effect on phase transformations in CsBr–PbBr2 system: coordination and ratio of precursors. Chem. Mater. 2018;30:5846–5852. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00537. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Zhumekenov AA, et al. The role of surface tension in the crystallization of metal halide perovskites. ACS Energy Lett. 2017;2:1782–1788. doi: 10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00468. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Liu Y, et al. Fast growth of thin MAPbI3 crystal wafers on aqueous solution surface for efficient lateral‐structure perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019;29:1807707. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201807707. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Liu Y, et al. Surface-tension-controlled crystallization for high-quality 2D perovskite single crystals for ultrahigh photodetection. Matter. 2019;1:465–480. doi: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Chen Y-X, et al. General space-confined on-substrate fabrication of thickness-adjustable hybrid perovskite single-crystalline thin films. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:16196–16199. doi: 10.1021/jacs.6b09388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen Z, et al. Thin single crystal perovskite solar cells to harvest below-bandgap light absorption. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:1890. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02039-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Liu Y, et al. Low-temperature-gradient crystallization for multi-inch high-quality perovskite single crystals for record performance photodetectors. Mater. Today. 2019;22:67–75. doi: 10.1016/j.mattod.2018.04.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wang W, et al. Electronic‐Grade High‐Quality Perovskite Single Crystals by a Steady Self‐Supply Solution Growth for High‐Performance X‐ray Detectors. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2001540. doi: 10.1002/adma.202001540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Saidaminov MI, et al. High-quality bulk hybrid perovskite single crystals within minutes by inverse temperature crystallization. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7586. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu Y, et al. Two-inch-sized perovskite CH3NH3PbX3 (X= Cl, Br, I) crystals: growth and characterization. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:5176–5183. doi: 10.1002/adma.201502597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yao F, et al. Room-temperature liquid diffused separation induced crystallization for high-quality perovskite single crystals. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1194. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15037-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zheng X, et al. Dual functions of crystallization control and defect passivation enabled by sulfonic zwitterions for stable and efficient perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:1803428. doi: 10.1002/adma.201803428. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Saidaminov MI, Abdelhady AL, Maculan G, Bakr OM. Retrograde solubility of formamidinium and methylammonium lead halide perovskites enabling rapid single crystal growth. Chem. Commun. 2015;51:17658–17661. doi: 10.1039/C5CC06916E. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gui Z, Qian J, An Q, Xu H, Zhao Q. Synthesis, characterization and flocculation performance of zwitterionic copolymer of acrylamide and 4-vinylpyridine propylsulfobetaine. Eur. Polym. J. 2009;45:1403–1411. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2009.02.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Viana, R. B., da Silva, A. B. & Pimentel, A. S. Infrared spectroscopy of anionic, cationic, and zwitterionic surfactants. Advances in physical chemistry2012 (2012).
  • 32.Krieg F, et al. Stable ultraconcentrated and ultradilute colloids of CsPbX3 (X= Cl, Br) nanocrystals using natural lecithin as a capping ligand. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:19839–19849. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kern R, Dassonville R. Growth inhibitors and promoters examplified on solution growth of paraffin crystals. J. Cryst. growth. 1992;116:191–203. doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(92)90129-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Rimer JD, et al. Crystal growth inhibitors for the prevention of L-cystine kidney stones through molecular design. Science. 2010;330:337–341. doi: 10.1126/science.1191968. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Gibbs JW. On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Am. J. Sci. 1878;3:441–458. doi: 10.2475/ajs.s3-16.96.441. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perillat-Merceroz, G. et al. In MOCVD growth mechanisms of ZnO nanorods, Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 012034 (IOP Publishing) (2010).
  • 37.Akiyama M, Kawarada Y, Ueda T, Nishi S, Kaminishi K. Growth of high quality GaAs layers on Si substrates by MOCVD. J. Cryst. Growth. 1986;77:490–497. doi: 10.1016/0022-0248(86)90342-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Lin C, et al. Effects of passivation and extraction surface trap density on the 1/f noise of HgCdTe photoconductive detector. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 1997;9:232–234. doi: 10.1109/68.553102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Carr JA, Chaudhary S. The identification, characterization and mitigation of defect states in organic photovoltaic devices: a review and outlook. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013;6:3414–3438. doi: 10.1039/c3ee41860j. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Fang Y, Huang J. Resolving weak light of sub‐picowatt per square centimeter by hybrid perovskite photodetectors enabled by noise reduction. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:2804–2810. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Zhao J, et al. Perovskite-filled membranes for flexible and large-area direct-conversion X-ray detector arrays. Nat. Photonics. 2020;14:612–617. doi: 10.1038/s41566-020-0678-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wei H, et al. Dopant compensation in alloyed CH3NH3PbBr3− xClx perovskite single crystals for gamma-ray spectroscopy. Nat. Mater. 2017;16:826–833. doi: 10.1038/nmat4927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Yang B, et al. Heteroepitaxial passivation of Cs2AgBiBr6 wafers with suppressed ionic migration for X-ray imaging. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1989. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09968-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Zhuang R, et al. Highly sensitive X-ray detector made of layered perovskite-like (NH4)3 Bi2I9 single crystal with anisotropic response. Nat. Photonics. 2019;13:602–608. doi: 10.1038/s41566-019-0466-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Pan W, et al. Cs2AgBiBr6 single-crystal X-ray detectors with a low detection limit. Nat. photonics. 2017;11:726–732. doi: 10.1038/s41566-017-0012-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Huang Y, et al. A‐site Cation Engineering for Highly Efficient MAPbI3 Single‐Crystal X‐ray Detector. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:17834–17842. doi: 10.1002/anie.201911281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Ponpon J, Amann M. Current instability and polarization phenomena in lead iodide crystalline detectors. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detect. Associated Equip. 2004;526:447–454. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2004.03.136. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Grill R, et al. Polarization study of defect structure of CdTe radiation detectors. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci. 2011;58:3172–3181. doi: 10.1109/TNS.2011.2165730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yang S, et al. Stabilizing halide perovskite surfaces for solar cell operation with wide-bandgap lead oxysalts. Science. 2019;365:473–478. doi: 10.1126/science.aax3294. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Meggiolaro D, et al. Iodine chemistry determines the defect tolerance of lead-halide perovskites. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018;11:702–713. doi: 10.1039/C8EE00124C. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Wang Q, et al. Qualifying composition dependent p and n self-doping in CH3NH3PbI3. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014;105:163508. doi: 10.1063/1.4899051. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Deng Y, et al. Reduced Self-Doping of Perovskites Induced by Short Annealing for Efficient Solar Modules. Joule. 2020;4:1949–1960. doi: 10.1016/j.joule.2020.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (746.5KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES