Skip to main content
Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques logoLink to Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases, Innovations and Techniques
. 2020 Dec 1;7(1):176–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2020.11.005

Left renal vein as a graft for aortic reconstruction in a patient with primary aortoenteric fistula secondary to a mycotic aneurysm

Phong T Le a,, Thao H Nguyen a, Kien T Nguyen b, Nut V Lam a
PMCID: PMC7966847  PMID: 33748557

Abstract

Description of the use of the left renal vein for aortic reconstruction in primary aortoenteric fistula secondary to a mycotic aneurysm has not been found in the literature. We report here a case of primary aortoenteric fistula secondary to a mycotic aneurysm with gross retroperitoneal contamination that was successfully treated by using a left renal vein graft for aortic reconstruction.

Keywords: Primary aortoenteric fistula, Mycotic aneurysm, Left renal vein graft, Omentum interposition, In situ aortic reconstruction


Primary aortoenteric fistula (PAEF) is defined as a communication between the native aorta and gastrointestinal tract.1 Despite the higher incidence of infected abdominal aortic aneurysms in the Asian population as compared with that in the Western population (13.6% vs 1%-2%),2,3 PAEF secondary to a mycotic aneurysm has rarely been reported in the Asian literature.

In this report, we present the successful treatment of an urgent PAEF secondary to a mycotic aneurysm with gross retroperitoneal contamination by using a left renal vein (LRV) as an autogenous graft for aortic reconstruction. Patient consent for this publication was obtained before submission.

Case presentation

A 48-year-old man was admitted in the emergency department for a severe hematochezia associated with a septic shock and a history of back pain, fever, and chills for several weeks. Two weeks before admission, he experienced two episodes of hematemesis and hematochezia at a local medical center but was discharged when the bleeding stopped.

At admission in our institution, the patient was in shock with a systolic arterial pressure of 80 mm Hg and a fever of 38.5°C. Laboratory findings demonstrated a hemoglobin level of 6.7 g/dL and a hyperleucocytemia of 25.5 × 109/L. Renal function was deteriorated with a serum creatinine level of 1.89 mg/dL and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 41 mL/min/1.73 m2. After quick resuscitation, a computed tomography angiography was carried out showing the extravasation of contrast media from a ruptured aneurysm of the infrarenal abdominal aorta in the duodenum and a gross purulent collection in the left paravertebral retroperitoneum (Fig 1). As the patient was unstable, he was brought immediately to the operating room.

Fig 1.

Fig 1

Three-dimensional reconstruction (A) and axial computed tomography imaging (B) of the mycotic aortic aneurysm with duodenal fistula. (1) Gross pus collection in the left paravertebral retroperitoneum, (2) aortic mycotic aneurysm, and (3) aortoduodenal fistula with extravasation of contrast media in the duodenum.

At laparotomy, after infrarenal proximal clamping and distal control of the common iliac arteries, the aneurysm was opened and an aortoduodenal fistula was found in the third part of the duodenum (Fig 2, A). Gross pus in the paravertebral retroperitoneal region was aspirated, and a large debridement of all necrotic para-aortic tissue and infected retroperitoneal cavity was performed. The LRV was then harvested and used as a material for an end-to-end aortic bypass (Fig 2, B). The great omentum was used to wrap the LRV as well as the infrarenal abdominal aorta (Fig 2, C). The duodenum was closed in two layers in combination with a jejunostomy. Bacterial cultures were positive for Burkholderia pseudomallei, and an intravenous antibiotic treatment was introduced according to the results of the antibiogram. Nutrition was given via the jejunostomy together with parenteral way. Postoperative renal function improved with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of 148 mL/min/1.73 m2. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 28th postoperative day on oral antibiotic therapy. Regular follow-up visits were scheduled to monitor renal function and the LRV graft integrity. A computed tomography angiography performed 3 months after the operation showed a patent graft and both kidneys were well perfused (Fig 3). The renal function monitored by serum creatinine level and eGFR was constantly normal.

Fig 2.

Fig 2

A, Intraoperative view of the aortic lesion and fistula. B, Aortic reconstruction with the left renal vein (LRV) showing perfect congruence between the diameter of the aorta and that of the LRV. C, Perforated lesion at the third portion of the duodenum exposed by DeBakey forceps' jaws and omentum coverage marked with an asterisk (∗).

Fig 3.

Fig 3

Computed tomography angiography at 3 months showing a patent left renal vein (LRV) graft of adequate diameter and two well-perfused kidneys. Note that the dashed lines represent the proximal and distal anastomoses. The LRV graft was estimated to be 3.48 cm in length, 16 mm in the largest diameter, and 12.5 mm in the smallest diameter.

Discussion

Management of PAEF is based on the emergency of the case and the severity of local infection at the time of surgery. In case of mild contamination, in situ replacement of the aorta with a prosthesis and repair of the associated bowel lesion with local debridement followed by long-term antibiotic therapy has been considered.4 In a review of 118 cases by Sweeney and Gadacz,5 33 patients were operated, with an operative mortality of 36%, and 19 of 22 survivors with a prosthetic aortic reconstruction combined with duodenal repair experienced long-term survival. These results are consistent with another report of 35 cases.6

Though, in case of gross retroperitoneal contamination and sepsis, aneurysm resection, aortic suture below the renal arteries, omentoplasty, retroperitoneal debridement, and extra-anatomic bypass remained the preferred technique but with a significant postoperative mortality and a high risk of limb loss.4,7

The use of an autologous femoral vein in the treatment of aortic graft infection has been reported in the literature, but not in case of primary infected aortic aneurysms with aorto-enteric fistula.8,9 In a series of 44 patients, Dubois et al10 treated five patients with mycotic aneurysms by using an autologous femoral vein. Two patients died in the early postoperative period, and three survive without signs of recurrent infection and a patent graft. The advantage of using a femoral vein is its resistance to infection and aneurysmal dilatation.8,9,11, 12, 13 However, removal of the femoral vein is time-consuming and not suitable in an emergency setting. Considering the circumstances, the operating team decided to use the LRV for an in situ aortic reconstruction because it provides an autogenous graft of sufficient length between 3 and 4 cm and of adequate caliber when harvested from the left gonadal vein proximally to its termination in the vena cava14 and its diameter matches well with that of a normal aorta. In addition, the LRV is easily accessible without any additional incision and without the need for an additional operating team. This saves time avoiding the risk of pelvic and lower limb ischemia due to long-lasting aortic clamping.

A potential drawback of removal of the LRV is the theoretical risk of renal failure. However, previous studies demonstrated that the functional capacity of the left kidney is most of the time preserved despite ligation of the LRV. McCullough et al15 reported that after a right nephrectomy and ligation of the LRV for malignancy, only one of three patients experienced transient renal insufficiency. In addition, the LRV has been used for portal vein reconstruction, and Miyazaki et al16 have shown in a series of 14 patients that renal function was maintained with only a transient rise of serum creatinine levels. Similar results were reported by Loveday et al,17 showing normal long-term renal function after the use of the LRV for portal or superior mesenteric vein reconstructions in 17 patients with advanced pancreatic and biliary resections. Comparable results were found by Smoot et al18 in nine patients.

Finally, in aortic surgery, it has been reported that simultaneous ligation and division of the LRV without reconstruction for open repair of complex aortic aneurysm do not result in renal failure.19, 20, 21 In our case, the LRV was resected with preservation of the renal-azygos drainage and of the gonadal vein.14,15,17,18,21

Considering repair of the duodenal fistula, a recent review revealed lower rates of recurrent fistula after Roux-en-Y repair compared with simple closure of the duodenum. In this review, great omentum interposition between the bowel and the aorta was also associated with a lower postoperative mortality regardless of the technique used to close the duodenum.22 In our case, a simple closure of the duodenum was performed but in association with a T-tube jejunostomy that allows rapid enteral feeding, quite critical in an infected patient, and the great omentum was enfolded around the aorta separating it from the digestive tract.10

Conclusion

In our experience, the management of PAEF secondary to a mycotic aneurysm remains challenging, particularly in case of gross retroperitoneal contamination. The favorable evolution observed in this case suggests that the LRV can be a useful alternative for urgent aortic reconstruction, especially in the case of a mycotic aneurysm with aortic wall damage less than 4 cm in length.

Footnotes

Author conflict of interest: none.

The editors and reviewers of this article have no relevant financial relationships to disclose per the Journal policy that requires reviewers to decline review of any manuscript for which they may have a conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Milner R., Minc S. Local complications: aortoenteric fistula. In: Sidawy A.N., Perler B.A., editors. Rutherford’s vascular surgery and endovascular therapy. 9th ed. Elsevier; Philadelphia: 2019. pp. 615–623. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Reddy D.J., Shepard A.D., Evans J.R., Wright D.J., Smith R.F., Ernst C.B. Management of infected aortoiliac aneurysms. Arch Surg. 1991;126:873–878. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1991.01410310083012. discussion: 878-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hsu R.B., Tsay Y.G., Wang S.S., Chu S.H. Surgical treatment for primary infected aneurysm of the descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, and iliac arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2002;36:746–755. doi: 10.1067/mva.2002.126557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pagni S., Denatale R.W., Sweeney T., McLaughlin C., Ferneini A.M. Primary aorto-duodenal fistula secondary to infected abdominal aortic aneurysms: the role of local debridement and extra-anatomic bypass. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1999;40:31–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sweeney M.S., Gadacz T.R. Primary aortoduodenal fistula: manifestation, diagnosis, and treatment. Surgery. 1984;96:492. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Voorhoeve R., Moll F.L., Bast T.J. The primary aortoenteric fistula in the Netherlands—the unpublished cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1996;11:429. doi: 10.1016/s1078-5884(96)80176-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Robinson J.A., Johansen K. Aortic sepsis: Is there a role for in situ graft reconstruction? J Vasc Surg. 1991;13:677. doi: 10.1067/mva.1991.28074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nevelsteen A., Lacroix H., Suy R. Autogenous reconstruction with the lower extremity deep veins: an alternative treatment of prosthetic infection after reconstructive surgery for aortoiliac disease. J Vasc Surg. 1995;22:129–134. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(95)70106-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Daenens K., Fourneau I., Nevelsteen A. Ten-year experience in autogenous reconstruction with the femoral vein in the treatment of aortofemoral prosthetic infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;25:240–245. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2002.1835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Dubois M., Daenens K., Houthoofd S., Peetermans W.E., Fourneau I. Treatment of mycotic aneurysms with involvement of the abdominal aorta: single-centre experience in 44 consecutive cases. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40:450–456. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2010.07.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Franke S., Voit R. The superficial femoral vein as arterial substitute in infections of the aortoiliac region. Ann Vasc Surg. 1997;11:406–412. doi: 10.1007/s100169900069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Brown P.M., Jr., Kim V.B., Lalikos J.F., Deaton D.H., Bogey W.M., Powell C.S. Autologous superficial femoral vein for aortic reconstruction in infected fields. Ann Vasc Surg. 1999;13:32–36. doi: 10.1007/s100169900217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Benjamin M.E., Cohn E.J., Jr., Purtill W.A., Hanna D.J., Lilly M.P., Flinn W.R. Arterial reconstruction with deep leg veins for the treatment of mycotic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 1999;30:1004–1015. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(99)70038-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Miyazaki M., Itoh H., Kaiho T., Ambiru S., Togawa A., Sasada K. Portal vein reconstruction at the hepatic hilus using a left renal vein graft. J Am Coll Surg. 1995;180:497–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCullough D.L., Gittes R.F. Ligation of the renal vein in the solitary kidney: effects on renal function. J Urol. 1975;113:295–298. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)59466-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Miyazaki M., Suzuki T., Yoshidome H., Kimura F. Renal function is well maintained after use of left renal vein graft for vascular reconstruction in hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgery. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;202:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Loveday B., Dib M.J., Sequeira S., Alotaiby N., Visser R., Barbas A.S. Renal outcomes following left renal vein haverst for vascular reconstructions during pancreas and liver surgery. HPB. 2019;21:114–120. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2018.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Smoot R.L., Christein J.D., Farnell M.B. An innovative option for venous reconstruction after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the left renal vein. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007;11:425–431. doi: 10.1007/s11605-007-0131-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Adar R., Rabbi I., Bass A., Papa M.Z., Schneiderman J., Walden R. Left renal vein division in abdominal aortic aneurysm operations. Effect on renal function. Arch Surg. 1985;120:1033–1036. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390330045008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.McCombs P.R., DeLaurentis D.A. Division of the left renal vein. Guidelines and consequences. Am J Surg. 1979;138:257–263. doi: 10.1016/0002-9610(79)90382-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Savlania A., Parameshwarappa S.K., Viswanathan S., Unnikrishnan M. Collateral venous drainage of solitary functioning left kidney with occluded renal vein following juxtarenal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2015;3:325. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2014.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rodrigues dos Santos C., Casaca R., Mendes de Almeida J.C., Mendes-Pedro L. Enteric repair in aortoduodenal fistulas: a forgotten but often lethal player. Ann Vasc Surg. 2014;28:756–762. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2013.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Vascular Surgery Cases and Innovative Techniques are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES