Abstract
The difluoromethyl (CHF2) group has attracted significant attention in drug discovery and development efforts, owing to its ability to serve as fluorinated bioisostere of methyl, hydroxyl, and thiol groups. Herein, we report an efficient biocatalytic method for the highly diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of CHF2-containing trisubstituted cyclopropanes. Using engineered myoglobin catalysts, a broad range of α-difluoromethyl alkenes are cyclopropanated in the presence of ethyl diazoacetate to give CHF2-containing cyclopropanes in high yield (up to >99%, up to 3,000 TON) and with excellent stereoselectivity (up to >99% de and ee). By means of an enantiodivergent myoglobin variant, the opposite enantiomer of the cyclopropane product was also obtained. This methodology represents a powerful strategy for the stereoselective synthesis of high-value fluorinated building blocks for medicinal chemistry, as exemplified through the formal total synthesis of a CHF2 isostere of a TRPV1 inhibitor.
Graphical Abstract

CHieF2 cyclopropanes: A biocatalytic method was developed for the highly diastereo- and enantioselective synthesis of CHF2-substituted cyclopropanes via myoglobin-catalyzed carbene transfer. These biocatalysts offer broad substrate scope, enantiodivergent selectivity and could be applied to produce a difluoromethyl bioisostere of a drug candidate.
Due to their peculiar conformational properties, cyclopropane rings contribute key structural motifs and pharmacophores in many natural and synthetic bioactive molecules.[1] Accordingly, there has been a significant interest in developing methodologies for the synthesis of functionalized cyclopropanes.[2] Along with cyclopropanes, fluorinated substituents have been extensively exploited in medicinal chemistry toward the discovery and development of new drugs.[3] It is indeed well recognized that the introduction of fluorinated substituents can significantly affect the pKa, lipophilicity, cell permeability, and/or metabolic stability of a bioactive molecule, often leading to significant improvements in its pharmacological and/or pharmacokinetic properties.[3]
Among fluorinated substituents, the CHF2 group has recently attracted considerable attention due to its value in serving as bioisostere for the methyl group,[4] which is widely exploited for tuning the pharmacological properties of bioactive molecules.[5] In addition, owing to its electronic and hydrogen bond donor properties, the CHF2 group has also been exploited as a functional mimic of hydroxyl or thiol groups.[6] For example, a CHF2 moiety was employed to mimic a cysteine thiol group in inhibitors of the hepatitis C virus NS3 protease, resulting in analogs with enhanced potency.[7]
Despite the well recognized utility of cyclopropanes and CHF2 groups in medicinal chemistry, the asymmetric synthesis of difluoromethyl-containing cyclopropanes has remained largely underdeveloped.[8] To the best of our knowledge, the only example of an asymmetric synthesis of CHF2-containing cyclopropanes with broad substrate scope involves rhodium-catalyzed cyclopropanations in the presence of donor-acceptor or acceptor-acceptor diazo reagents (Scheme 1a).[9a] Notably, no chemo- or biocatalytic methods have been reported for the asymmetric cyclopropanation of CHF2-containing olefins with readily available acceptor-only diazo reagents.
Scheme 1.

Biocatalytic cyclopropanation of α-difluoromethylated alkenes.
Over the past few years, heme-containing proteins[10] and artificial metalloenzymes[11] have emerged as promising systems for catalyzing ‘abiological’ cyclopropanation reactions.[12] In particular, our group has previously reported the high activity and stereoselectivity of engineered myoglobins (Mb) toward promoting the cyclopropanation of aryl-substituted olefins with ethyl diazoacetate.[10b, 10c] More recently, the scope of these biocatalysts and myoglobin-catalyzed reactions was expanded to include other diazo reagents carrying α-electron withdrawing groups (Scheme 1b) as well as other olefins, producing enantioenriched cyclopropanes amenable to further diversification.[13] Despite this progress, fluorinated olefins have remained elusive substrates for biocatalytic cyclopropanations. Herein, we report the first example of a (bio)catalytic method for the stereoselective synthesis of difluoromethyl-functionalized cyclopropanes, which was made possible through the cyclopropanation of electron poor α-difluoromethyl alkenes by means of engineered myoglobin catalysts (Scheme 1).
We started this work by testing the catalytic activity of wild-type sperm whale myoglobin (Mb) toward catalyzing the formation of cyclopropane 3a starting from α-difluoromethyl styrene (2a) in the presence of ethyl diazoacetate (EDA, 1) as carbene source (Table 1, entry 1). While showing promising activity (37% yield), wild-type Mb produced 3a with only moderate diastereoselectivity (79% de) and very poor enantioselectivity (5% ee). Given the previously established influence of these residues on the activity and stereoselectivity of myoglobin-catalyzed cyclopropanation reactions,[10b, 10c, 10h, 10i] we decided to screen a panel of Mb variants with varying steric demands at the level of the distal His64 residue (→Gly/Ala/Val) and Val68 (→Gly/Ala/Phe) (Table 1), which is located in close proximity to the heme center (SI Figure S1). Among these variants, Mb(H64V,V68A) and Mb(H64A,V68A) were found to exhibit significantly improved diastereo- and enantioselectivity (97 to >99% de and ee) compared to the wild-type protein (Table 1, entries 5–6). In addition, Mb(H64V,V68A) offered also improved activity, resulting in the nearly quantitative conversion (97%) of the fluorinated olefin to the desired cyclopropanation product 3a. Comparison of the results for the single variants Mb(H64V) and Mb(V68A) (Table 1, entries 2–3) and other double mutant variants, the two mutations in Mb(H64V,V68A) appear to have a clear synergistic effect in improving the performance of the biocatalyst, with the Val68Ala mutation mainly driving the improvement in stereoinduction and the His64Val mutation being crucial for improving activity and further refining its stereoselectivity (e.g., 91 → >99% ee). At position 68, a further reduction in steric bulk (e.g., Ala→Gly) reduces both diastereo- and enantioselectivity (entry 7 vs. 6), while the introduction of a bulkier residue (Phe) produces a variant with parent-like properties and a slight preference for the opposite enantiomer (−4% ee; entry 8).
Table 1.
Myoglobin-catalyzed cyclopropanation of α-difluoromethyl-styrene (2a) in the presence of ethyl 2-diazoacetate (EDA, 1).[a]
![]() | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | Protein | Yield (GC) | TON | d.e. | e.e. |
| 1 | Mb | 37% | 185 | 79% | 5% |
| 2 | Mb(H64V) | 20% | 100 | 75% | 4% |
| 3 | Mb(V68A) | 33% | 165 | 97% | 91% |
| 4 | Mb(H64G,V68A) | 38% | 190 | 99% | 90% |
| 5 | Mb(H64A,V68A) | 26% | 130 | 99% | 98% |
| 6 | Mb(H64V,V68A) | 97% | 485 | 97% | >99% |
| 7 | Mb(H64V,V68G) | 44% | 220 | 71% | 92% |
| 8 | Mb(H64V,V68F) | 21% | 105 | 76% | −4% |
| 9 | Mb(H64V,V68A)[b] | 30% | 3,000 | 96% | 98% |
| 10 | Mb(H64V,V68A)[c] | 87%d | 435 | >99% | >99% |
| 11 | Mb(H64V,V68A)[e] | 67% | 335 | 96% | >99% |
| 12 | Mb(L29T,H64V,V68F) | 58% | 290 | 90% | −87% |
Reaction conditions: 20 μM purified Mb variant, 10 mM styrene (2a), 20 mM EDA (1), 10 mM Na2S2O4, in phosphate buffer (KPi 50 mM, pH 7), r.t., 16 hours. Product yield, diastereomeric and enantiomeric excess were determined by chiral GC-FID analysis.
Using 1 μM Mb(H64V,V68A).
70 mg of 2a in 45-mL scale.
Isolated yield.
Using whole cells (OD600 = 10).
On the basis of these results, Mb(H64V,V68A) was selected as the most promising biocatalyst for the target cyclopropanation reaction. Further investigations showed that Mb(H64V,V68A) catalyzes the formation of 3a with an initial rate of 520 TON/min and the reaction reaches >75% completion in less than 5 min (SI Figure S2). While fast, this rate is 2-fold lower than the Mb(H64V,V68A)-catalyzed cyclopropanation of styrene with EDA (initial rate of 1000 TON/min),[10b] possibly reflecting the lower reactivity of the CHF2-containing substrate due to both electronic and steric effects. Under catalyst-limited condition, Mb(H64V,V68A) was determined to support up to 3,000 turnovers (TON) (Table 1, entry 9). Furthermore, the reaction could be readily scaled up to afford 95 mg of enantiopure 3a (>99% de and ee) in high isolated yield (87%) (Table 1, entry 10).
We also tested the possibility to carry out this transformation in whole cells, which is of practical relevance for industrial processes.[14] Under these conditions, the Mb(H64V,V68A)-catalyzed reaction in cellulo successfully produced the desired cyclopropane 3a while maintaining high diastereoselectivity and excellent enantioselectivity (96% de and >99% ee; Table 1, entry 11), albeit with reduced yield compared to the reaction with purified protein (67% vs. 97%). Interestingly, these experiments showed a bell-shape dependence of yield on cell density, with an optimum at relatively low cell density (OD600 = 10) (SI Table S1). Counterintuitively, a reduction in yield was observed at higher cell densities (67%→45–48%), which may arise from partial sequestration of the fluorinated substrate by the cell membrane or other cellular components.
To explore the generality of this biocatalytic method, several α-difluoromethylated styrenes bearing different electron-donating and withdrawing substituents at the ortho-, meta- and para- position of the phenyl ring were tested in the Mb(H64V,V68A)-catalyzed cyclopropanation with EDA (Scheme 2). Despite a general reduction in yield (35–82% vs. 98%), substituents in meta- and ortho- positions were well tolerated by the Mb(H64V,V68A) catalyst, as evinced from the synthesis of 3b-3d with high to excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity (95–96% de and 89–99% ee). A similar trend applies to para-substituted styrenes with small to medium-sized substituents at the para position such as fluoro (3i), methyl (3e), chloro (3j), and bromo (3k) groups, all of which underwent Mb(H64V,V68A)-catalyzed transformation to give the corresponding CHF2-substituted cyclopropanes with high stereoselectivity (93–96% de, 82–94% ee) along with high yields (93–96%; Scheme 2). In contrast, the presence of bulkier substituents at the para position such as methoxy (3g), isopropyl (3f) and dimethylamino (3h) groups were accompanied by a noticeable reduction in yield and, for the latter two, also in enantioselectivity (21–25% ee). Interestingly, this structure-reactivity trend diverges significantly from that observed for the Mb(H64V,V68A)-catalyzed cyclopropanation of styrenes with EDA and other acceptor-only diazo reagents,[10c] thus indicating an important effect of the CHF2 group on the substrate interaction with the biocatalyst. Nevertheless, structural characterization of 3k by X-ray crystallography (Scheme 2; SI Figure S4) revealed a (1R,2S) absolute configuration of the cyclopropane product, which mirrors the (1S,2S)-stereoselectivity of Mb(H64V,V68A) with styrene and EDA.[10b, 10c] Based on this information and the previously reported stereochemical model for this reaction, we posited that enlargement of the active site cavity at the level of His64, such as in Mb(H64G,V68A), should better accommodate the bulkier para-substituted styrenes. Gratifyingly, the Mb(H64G,V68A) variant proved indeed to be a superior catalyst for the synthesis of 3f-3h, offering higher diastereo- and enantioselectivity for these transformations (96–99% de, 41–85% ee).
Scheme 2.

Substrate scope of Mb(H64V,V68A)-catalyzed cyclopropanation of α-difluoromethyl-olefins. [a]
[a] Reaction conditions: 20 μM Mb(H64V,V68A), 10 mM alkene, 20 mM EDA (1), 10 mM Na2S2O4 in KPi 50 mM (pH 7), r.t., 16 hours. Yield, diastereomeric and enantiomeric excess determined by chiral GC-FID analysis using 1,3-benzodioxole as internal standard. [b] Using Mb(H64G,V68A) as catalyst. CCDC entry for 3k: 1893087
The high activity of Mb(H64V,V68A) in the cyclopropanation of p-(fluoro)-α-CHF2-fluorostyrene (2i) encouraged us to test additional electron-deficient alkenes, which are challenging substrates for carbene transfer catalysts due to the typically electrophilic character of their metallo-carbene intermediate.[11h, 15] Notably, electrondeficient α-difluoromethyl-styrenes carrying CF3-, formyl-, or a cyano substituent in the ring could efficiently converted into the corresponding cyclopropanation products 3l, 3m, and 3n, respectively, in good yields (up to 80%) and excellent stereoselectivity (up to 99% de and 96% ee). Moreover, the absence of side reactions with 4-(formyl)−α-CHF2-styrene demonstrated the chemoselectivity and compatibility of the biocatalytic method with a substrate containing a reactive aldehyde group.
Substrate scope was then extended to aromatic O- and S-containing heterocycles which are widely used in medicinal chemistry.[3e] Specifically, benzofuran- and thiophene-containing substrates were converted into product 3o and 3p, respectively, with high diastereo- and enantioselectivity (72–92% de, 95 to >99% ee). Of note, Mb(H64V,V68A) also retained high activity toward 2o (54% yield) despite the relatively large size of this substrate. An unactivated alkene such as 4-phenyl-2-(difluoromethyl) butene (2q) was also tested. While Mb(H64V,V68A) was able to afford the desired cyclopropane product 3q in low yield (Scheme 2), the Mb(H64G,V68A) variant proved to be a superior biocatalyst for this transformation, offering higher yield (15% vs. 5%) along with higher enantioselectivity (51% vs. 25% ee) and excellent diastereoselectivity (>99% de), thus demonstrating the utility of these biocatalysts also in the context of unactivated olefins.
Having established the generality of Mb(H64V,V68A) for the synthesis of cis-(1R,2S)-difluoromethylated cyclopropanes, we investigated the possibility to obtain an enantiodivergent biocatalyst for this reaction. As shown for Mb(H64V,V68F) in Table 1, the substitution of Val68 with Phe resulted in a modest but detectable inversion of enantioselectivity toward formation of the (1S,2R)-configured cyclopropane (Table 1, entry 8). Based on this result, a panel of V68F-containing engineered myoglobins were tested and found to exhibit enhanced (1S,2R)-enantioselectivity (SI Table S2). Among them, Mb(L29T,H64V,V68F) was able to produce the desired (1S,2R)-enantiomer of 3a in good yield (58%) and high enantiomeric excess (90% de and −87% ee) (Table 1, entry 12), thereby demonstrating the feasibility of achieving enantiodivergent selectivity in this myoglobin-catalyzed reaction.
To further explore the scope of this methodology in the context of fluoromethylated olefins, Mb(H64V,V68A) was challenged with α-fluoromethyl-styrene (4) and α-(trifluoromethyl)-styrene (6). Notably, both substrates were efficiently converted into the desired CH2F- and CF3-substituted cyclopropanes 5 and 7, respectively, in high yield and excellent diastereo- and enantioselectivity (96–99% de and 98 to >99% ee; Scheme 3a–b), which further highlighted the broad substrate profile of this enzyme.
Scheme 3.

Biocatalytic cyclopropanation of α-CH2F- and α-CF3-styrene and formal synthesis of a CHF2 isostere of a TRPV1 inhibitor drug candidate.
Finally, we tested the utility of the present biocatalytic approach toward the generation of a difluoromethyl bioisostere of a drug molecule. To this end, we targeted the synthesis of 10 (Scheme 3c), which corresponds to an analog of a TRPV1 inhibitor drug candidate developed by Pfizer[16] in which the methyl group is replaced by a CHF2 group. Using Mb(H64G,V68A) as the catalyst, α-difluoromethyl-substituted olefin 8 could be successfully cyclopropanated in a semi-preparative scale reaction to afford 9 (50 mg, 36%) with high stereoselectivity (99% de, 98% ee). This key intermediate can be then converted into the final product 10 in only two steps using established routes.[10c, 16]
In summary, we reported the first example of a biocatalytic system for the asymmetric cyclopropanation of difluoromethylated alkenes. Using two engineered myoglobins, Mb(H64V,V68A) and Mb(H64G,V68A), a broad panel of trisubstituted difluoromethylcyclopropanes were synthesized with good efficiency (up to 99% yield) and high to excellent stereoselectivity (up to >99% de and ee) using ethyl 2-diazoacetate as carbene donor. The scope of these biocatalysts extends to include unactivated olefins as well as mono- and trifluoro-methylated olefins, as exemplified through the successful synthesis of enantioenriched 3q, 5 and 7, respectively. The possibility of achieving enantiodivergent selectivity in this transformation was also demonstrated, with a stereocomplementary myoglobin variant showing up to −87% ee for this transformation. Finally, this strategy could be readily applied to enable the highly stereoselective synthesis of a key synthon for the chemoenzymatic synthesis of a difluoromethyl isostere of a drug candidate. This methodology is expected to create new opportunities for the biocatalytic and asymmetric synthesis of high-value fluorinated building blocks for organic and medicinal chemistry.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the U.S. National Institute of Health grant GM098628. The authors are grateful to Dr. William Brennessel for assistance with crystallographic analyses. MS and X-ray instrumentation are supported by U.S. National Science Foundation grants CHE-0946653 and CHE-1725028. This work was partially supported by Normandie Universiteé (NU), the Reégion Normandie, the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Universiteé de Rouen Normandie (URN), INSA Rouen Normandie, Labex SynOrg (ANR-11-LABX-0029) Innovation Chimie Carnot (I2C) and CNRS through the International Emerging Action program. J.D. thanks the Labex SynOrg (ANR-11-LABX-0029).
Footnotes
Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the documents
References
- [1].a) Talele TT, J. Med. Chem 2016, 59, 8712–8756; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Reichelt A, Martin SF, Acc. Chem. Res 2006, 39, 433–442; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Chen DYK, Pouwer RH, Richard JA, Chem Soc Rev 2012, 41, 4631–4642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [2].a) Doyle MP, Forbes DC, Chem. Rev 1998, 98, 911–936; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Pellissier H, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 7041–7095; [Google Scholar]; c) Lebel H, Marcoux JF, Molinaro C, Charette AB, Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 977–1050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [3].a) Bohm HJ, Banner D, Bendels S, Kansy M, Kuhn B, Muller K, Obst-Sander U, Stahl M, Chembiochem 2004, 5, 637–643; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b Isanbor C, O’Hagan D, J. Fluorine Chem 2006, 127, 303–319; [Google Scholar]; c) Purser S, Moore PR, Swallow S, Gouverneur V, Chem Soc Rev 2008, 37, 320–330; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d Gillis EP, Eastman KJ, Hill MD, Donnelly DJ, Meanwell NA, J. Med. Chem 2015, 58, 8315–8359; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ilardi EA, Vitaku E, Njardarson JT, J. Med. Chem 2014, 57, 2832–2842; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f Wang J, Sanchez-Rosello M, Acena JL, del Pozo C, Sorochinsky AE, Fustero S, Soloshonok VA, Liu H, Chem. Rev 2014, 114, 2432–2506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [4].a) Meanwell NA, J. Med. Chem 2011, 54, 2529–2591; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Zafrani Y, Yeffet D, Sod-Moriah G, Berliner A, Amir D, Marciano D, Gershonov E, Saphier S, J. Med. Chem 2017, 60, 797–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [5].Barreiro EJ, Kummerle AE, Fraga CAM, Chem. Rev 2011, 111, 5215–5246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [6].a) Erickson JA, Mcloughlin JI, J. Org. Chem 1995, 60, 1626–1631; [Google Scholar]; b Sessler CD, Rahm M, Becker S, Goldberg JM, Wang F, Lippard SJ, J Am Chem Soc 2017, 139, 9325–9332; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Zafrani Y, Sod-Moriah G, Yeffet D, Berliner A, Amir D, Marciano D, Elias S, Katalan S, Ashkenazi N, Madmon M, Gershonov E, Saphier S, J. Med. Chem 2019, 62, 5628–5637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [7].Narjes F, Koehler KF, Koch U, Gerlach B, Colarusso S, Steinkuhler C, Brunetti M, Altamura S, De Francesco R, Matassa VG, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2002, 12, 701–704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [8].a) Bos M, Poisson T, Pannecoucke X, Charette AB, Jubault P, Chem. Eur. J 2017, 23, 4950–4961; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Ishikawa T, Kasai N, Yamada Y, Hanamoto T, Tetrahedron 2015, 71, 1254–1260; [Google Scholar]; c) Hock KJ, Mertens L, Koenigs RM, Chem. Commun 2016, 52, 13783–13786; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Duan YY, Lin JH, Xiao JC, Gu YC, Chem. Commun 2017, 53, 3870–3873; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Decaens J, Couve-Bonnaire S, Charette A, Poisson T, Jubault P, Chemistry 2020, doi: 10.1002/chem.202003822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [9].a) Bos M, Huang WS, Poisson T, Pannecoucke X, Charette AB, Jubault P, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 13319–13323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Cao Z-Y, Wang W, Liao K, Wang X, Zhou J, Ma J, Org. Chem. Front 2018, 5, 2960–2968. [Google Scholar]
- [10].a) Coelho PS, Brustad EM, Kannan A, Arnold FH, Science 2013, 339, 307–310; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Bordeaux M, Tyagi V, Fasan R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2015, 54, 1744–1748; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Bajaj P, Sreenilayam G, Tyagi V, Fasan R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2016, 55, 16110–16114; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Vargas D, Khade R, Zhang Y, Fasan R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2019, 58, 10148–10152; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Knight AM, Kan SBJ, Lewis RD, Brandenberg OF, Chen K, Arnold FH, ACS Central Sci. 2018, 4, 372–377; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Brandenberg OF, Prier CK, Chen K, Knight AM, Wu Z, Arnold FH, ACS Catal. 2018, 8, 2629–2634; [Google Scholar]; g) Chen K, Zhang SQ, Brandenberg OF, Hong X, Arnold FH, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 16402–16407; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; h) Chandgude AL, Ren X, Fasan R, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2019, 141, 9145–9150; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; i) Ren X, Chandgude AL, Fasan R, ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 2308–2313; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; j) Ren XK, Liu NY, Chandgude AL, Fasan R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2020, 59, 21634–21639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [11].a) Srivastava P, Yang H, Ellis-Guardiola K, Lewis JC, Nat. Commun 2015, 6, 7789; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Sreenilayam G, Moore EJ, Steck V, Fasan R, Adv. Synth. Cat 2017, 359, 2076–2089; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Sreenilayam G, Moore EJ, Steck V, Fasan R, ACS Catal. 2017, 7, 7629–7633; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; d) Dydio P, Key HM, Nazarenko A, Rha JY, Seyedkazemi V, Clark DS, Hartwig JF, Science 2016, 354, 102–106; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; e) Ohora K, Meichin H, Zhao LM, Wolf MW, Nakayama A, Hasegawa J, Lehnert N, Hayashi T, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 17265–17268; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; f) Villarino L, Splan KE, Reddem E, Alonso-Cotchico L, de Souza CG, Lledos A, Marechal JD, Thunnissen AMWH, Roelfes G, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 7785–7789; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; g) Zhao JM, Bachmann DG, Lenz M, Gillingham DG, Ward TR, Catal. Sci. Technol 2018, 8, 2294–2298; [Google Scholar]; h) Carminati DM, Fasan R, ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 9683–9697. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [12].Kariyawasam K, Ricoux R, Mahy JP, J. Porphyr. Phthalocya 2019, 23, 1273–1285. [Google Scholar]
- [13].a) Chandgude AL, Fasan R, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 15852–15856; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Tinoco A, Steck V, Tyagi V, Fasan R, J Am Chem Soc 2017, 139, 5293–5296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [14].a) Tufvesson P, Lima-Ramos J, Nordblad M, Woodley JM, Org. Process Res. Dev 2011, 15, 266–274; [Google Scholar]; b) Wachtmeister J, Rother D, Curr. Opin. Biotech 2016, 42, 169–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [15].a) Chen Y, Ruppel JV, Zhang XP, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2007, 129, 12074-+; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; b) Wang HB, Guptill DM, Varela-Alvarez A, Musaev DG, Davies HML, Chem. Sci 2013, 4, 2844–2850; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; c) Lindsay VNG, Fiset D, Gritsch PJ, Azzi S, Charette AB, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2013, 135, 1463–1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- [16].Butcher KJ, Denton SM, Field SE, Gillmore AT, Harbottle GW, Howard RM, Laity DA, Ngono CJ, Pibworth BA, Org. Process. Res. Dev 2011, 15, 1192–1200. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

