Skip to main content
NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes logoLink to NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes
. 2021 Mar 17;7:25. doi: 10.1038/s41522-021-00201-y

Extracellular amoebal-vesicles: potential transmission vehicles for respiratory viruses

Rafik Dey 1,2,, Melanie A Folkins 2, Nicholas J Ashbolt 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC7969602  PMID: 33731696

Abstract

Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of acute respiratory tract infections in children and immunocompromised adults worldwide. Here we report that amoebae-release respirable-sized vesicles containing high concentrations of infectious RSV that persisted for the duration of the experiment. Given the ubiquity of amoebae in moist environments, our results suggest that extracellular amoebal-vesicles could contribute to the environmental persistence of respiratory viruses, including potential resistance to disinfection processes and thereby offering novel pathways for viral dissemination and transmission.

Subject terms: Water microbiology, Biofilms, Pathogens


Amoebae are amongst the most ubiquitous organisms in natural and engineered environments13. They live at interfaces (water-soil, water-animal, water-plants and water-air), adherent on various surfaces and feed on microorganisms3. While relatively few amoebae species are pathogens in their own right4, they are known natural environmental reservoirs for a range of amoeba-resisting bacterial pathogens, such as Legionella pneumophila, a water-based bacterium responsible for Legionnaires’ disease that results in major community health burden58. More recently, amoebae have been identified as potential reservoirs for non-enveloped respiratory and enteric viruses such as adenoviruses, coxsackieviruses, reovirus and the giant amoeba virus Mimivirus912. Several highly transmissible respiratory enveloped viruses with epidemic potential have emerged in last two decades, with the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic being the most significant to date13, yet their potential interaction with (sewage/faecal-borne) amoebae is unreported.

Human respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a large (120–300 nm diameter) pleomorphic enveloped virus with a non-segmented, negative-sense, single-stranded RNA that belongs to the Pneumoviridae family and is recognised as one of the most common causes of acute respiratory tract infections in children, older people, and immunocompromised adults1416. Despite the enormous burden of RSV disease, there is currently no efficacious vaccine nor antiviral drug therapy available17. RSV is a highly contagious pathogen and transmission is thought to be primarily by large droplets and fomites, but is yet to be fully resolved18. However, clinical and epidemiological studies of patients infected with RSV raised the possibility of faecal–oral transmission as described for other respiratory viruses1921. Herein we used RSV as a model for potential interactions of enveloped respiratory viruses with amoebae to ascertain their possible role as an environmental reservoir and vehicle for dissemination and transmission.

Within two hours of introducing GFP-RSV to an active culture of Willaertia magna (co-culture) the virus was observed within trophozoites and expelled vesicles (Fig. 1a). In a separate experiment, and after 72 h post introduction, fluorescence microscopy showed expelled respirable-sized amoebal-vesicles filled with GFP-RSV (Fig. 1b). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed pleomorphic RSV particles from different cross-sections within W. magna phagosomes (Fig. 2a). Further to this, the presence of RSV inside purified extracellular amoebal-vesicles was confirmed by TEM (Fig. 2b). Using the ImageJ software package22, the virions measurements (Table 1) were consistent with previous conventional EM studies2325.

Fig. 1. Intracellular RSV localisation.

Fig. 1

a Internalised GFP-RSV virus particles in live amoebae (trophozoites and released vesicles) using ImageStream® flow cytometry. b GFP-RSV virus particles packaged in excreted vesicles by W. magna using fluorescent microscopy (100x), released vesicle (white arrowhead) amoeba trophozoites (black arrowhead).

Fig. 2. Ultrastructural visualisation of internalised RSV.

Fig. 2

a Transmission electron microscopy of RSV particles within W. magna food vacuoles after 72 h of co-culture. b Purified released extracellular vesicle after 24 h of co-culture containing RSV virions. Virions were randomly selected and measured using ImageJ (marked 3–10). Three morphology categories of RSV were found: spherical (black arrowheads), asymmetric (marked av), and filamentous (marked fv). mitochondria (m), vacuole (v).

Table 1.

Extracellular Amoebal Vesicle (EAV) and internalised RSV virion measurements.

Area Mean Min Max Angle Length nm Shape
EAV
1 (width) 10344.39 172.874 24.109 240.099 0.141 2892.866 Spherical
2 (length) 10102.04 163.793 20.115 232.389 −87.973 2826.769 Spherical
RSV virions
3 688.776 160.64 60 206.963 −128.83 187.967 Spherical
4 816.327 172.059 112 206.317 −129.226 225.905 Spherical
5 688.776 168.842 43 208.019 3.24 189.589 Spherical
6 165.816 93.058 73.75 126 −4.764 43.006 Filamentous
7 178.571 129.304 96.314 182.515 −22.62 46.429 Filamentous
8 165.816 114.662 92 150 −109.983 41.802 Filamentous
9 1785.714 185.194 125 229.638 28.775 497.096 Asymmetric
10 816.327 171.882 102.797 208.049 −61.39 223.749 Asymmetric

It is important to note, that amoebae trophozoites were visibly unaffected by the presence of internalised RSV virus.

Based on the GFP expression, it appeared that the RSV within amoebal-vesicles could still be infectious26,27. Therefore, it was of interest to assess the infectivity of freshly isolated RSV-EAVs (Fig. 3a). The EAVs containing RSV were collected 24 h post infection and viral titres, as measured by traditional TCID50 analysis, demonstrated that RSV-EAVs were indeed infectious with titres peaking at ~104 TCID50 mL−1 (Fig. 3c), at a similar infectivity to RSV-only controls. Minor losses could be explained by the supernatant washing steps. On closer observation using phase-contrast microscopy there was also clear cytopathic effect induced by infectious RSV-EAVs in Hela cells, preventing the formation of the cells monolayer and affecting their appearance after 5 days of infection (Fig. 3d).

Fig. 3. RSV-EAVs isolation and infectivity assay.

Fig. 3

Micrographs (40x) of a Released extracellular amoebal-vesicles containing RSV and b Attached amoebae trophozoites. c Replication kinetics of the control RSV alone (black bar) and RSV-EAVs (white bar) analysed by TCID50 on Hela cells. Data are the mean ± SEM, n = 3 performed in triplicate. d Micrographs (20x) of cytopathic effect (CPE) induced by RSV-EAVs infection in Hela cells at 5 days post-infection.

Recently, multiple independent studies have revealed that different viruses may exploit the secretory autophagy pathway to exit cells via released vesicles2831. These amoebal-released packaged viruses could prolong their environmental infectivity (via fomites/aerosols/water system), as well when internalised by avoiding immune systems detection, such as evading recognition by neutralising antibodies32. Also, in a previous study utilising infectious Coxsackievirus B virions (i.e. a non-enveloped, enteric virus) we reported virions localised in Vermamoeba vermiformis trophozoites and expelled vesicles11. Overall, virus-laden vesicles would increase the (dose) likelihood to infect susceptible host cells33, as well as the virus’ infectivity, as demonstrated for enteroviruses with equivalent numbers of virions free versus within vesicles29,34,35. Extracellular vesicles containing enteric viruses are naturally shed in human and animal faeces (and amoebae grow in sewage/animal excreta, including bat guano)3638, which could be ingested and transmit to other hosts39. Interestingly, as evident in Figs 1 and 2, the released amoebal-vesicles are 2–3 μm in diameter, the size range expected to penetrate to the lower respiratory tract via mouth or nose inhalation40,41.

Taken together these interesting observations provide evidence to suggest that amoebae may contribute to the environmental persistence and transmission of respiratory viruses associated with natural aquatic environments and engineered water systems. Notably, extracellular amoebal-vesicles could enable non-enveloped and enveloped virion dissemination and aid in the transmission of respiratory viruses. Amoeba-packaged viruses (in trophozoites, cysts and vesicles) may also protect virions from inactivation via sunlight, biocides42 and antiviral host factors43,44. Hence, we recommend further study of the persistence and transmission of respiratory viruses in faecal droplets and aerosols to assess this newly proposed risk pathway; noting that sewage droplets/aerosols were shown to be important during the first SARS epidemic45, and associated with toilets and COVID-19 cases in hospitals46. Understanding how enveloped viruses persists in our environmental systems and interact with amoebae will contribute to our understanding of the epidemiology and microbial ecology of respiratory viruses and potentially permit the development of methods to further aid in their management.

Methods

Strains and culture conditions

The virus used in this study was green fluorescent protein-expressing RSV (GFP-RSV) containing the viral glycoproteins (S, G and F)47. The RSV was propagated on 80–90% confluent HeLa cells (ATCC CCL-2) in DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin-streptomycin at 37 °C and 5% CO2 in vented 75 cm2 cell-culture flasks.

The amoebae used in this study was Willaertia magna (ATCC 50035), a member of the Vahlkampfiidae family that was isolated from bovine faeces. Amoebae were grown in tissue culture flasks in SCGYEM (Serum-Casein-Glucose-Yeast-Extract-Medium: ATCC medium 1021) at 25 °C in a 5% CO2 incubator. The trophozoites were maintained in exponential growth phase by sub-culturing every 3–4 days in fresh SCGYEM. Amoebae were harvested by tapping the flasks to dislodge surface-adhered cells and subsequent centrifugation in a 15 mL screw-cap tube (FALCON, Fischer Scientific, Edmonton, Canada 3033) at 2000 × g for 10 min. Cells were washed three times with sterile distilled water to remove carried-over nutrients in the supernatants.

Imaging flow cytometry analysis

ImageStream® cytometry analysis and the instrument gating strategy for amoebae was performed as previously described37. Briefly, W. magna trophozoites were infected for 2 h with GFP-RSV at MOI of 100, washed and re-suspended in PBS prior to processing through the ImageStream®X Mark II (Millipore Sigma). Cells were examined at 60× magnification. Analysis was performed using the IDEAS software (Amnis, Seattle) and cells (fluorescent viruses and amoebae) were identified on the basis of bright field morphology, size and GFP signal.

Isolation of extracellular amoebal-vesicles (EAVs) containing RSV

W. magna and RSV were co-cultured at a ratio of 1:100 in conical Falcon tubes containing 3 mL of SCGYEM medium, vortexed to favour virus interaction with amoebae and then transferred to 6-well culture plates (Fisher Scientific 130185). After overnight incubation at 30 °C, samples were analysed using a phase-contrast microscope (Leica CTR 4000) to detect the presence of EAVs in the supernatant while amoebal trophozoites remain attached to the surface of the well plates. To isolate and separate the EAVs containing RSV from the attached trophozoites, supernatants were removed and transferred into new well plates several times. In brief, supernatants were gently removed with care taken not to disturb the attached amoebae on well plate surfaces, and transferred to new well plates for 10–20 min to allow any amoebal trophozoites to attach to surfaces (Fig. 3b). The isolated EAVs containing RSV were collected and washed twice with PBS by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 5 min to remove uninternalized viruses. The purified EAVs were then used for infectivity assays and microscopy.

RSV infectivity assays

RSV was released from amoebal vesicles by three consecutive freeze−thaw cycles. RSV infectivity (EAVs containing RSV and RSV-only control) was measured by infecting confluent HeLa cells in quadruplicate using 48-well plates and serial dilution of the virus in HeLa cells maintenance medium. Cells were observed daily for cytopathic effects for seven days and CPE was measured by the tissue culture infectious dose 50% (TCID50) using the Reed–Muench formula48.

Transmission electron microscopy

Axenic cultures of W. magna were co-cultured with RSV at a MOI of 100 on Thermonax® cover slips (Thermo Fisher 174985). After decanting the medium, amoebae were fixed at room temperature with 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (Electron Microscopy Sciences 15960). The samples were submitted for processing at the imaging core at University of Alberta, faculty of biological sciences. Sectioned and carbon-coated samples were observed with a Hitachi H-7650 transmission electron microscope.

Fluorescence microscopy

Co-cultures of W. magna-GFP-RSV were carried in 12-well tissue culture plates overlaid with microscopy cover slips (Fisher Scientific 12-5461) and incubated at 25 °C with 5% CO2. After 72 h of infection, the medium was removed and cells fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min at room temperature and then washed with phosphate-buffered saline three times. Images were taken with an EVOS FL fluorescent cell imaging system (ThermoFisher Scientific).

Reporting summary

Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.

Supplementary information

Reporting Summary (67.7KB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

These studies were supported by Alberta Innovates (grant # 201300490), Alberta, Canada. We would like to thank Dr. David Marchant (University of Alberta; Canada) for supplying the green fluorescent protein-expressing RSV (GFP-RSV) strain used in this study and Arlene Oatway for help with transmission electron microscopy (Microscopy Facility Biological Sciences, University of Alberta).

Author contributions

R.D. conceived the work. Sample preparations and assays were carried out by M.F. and R.D. R.D. and N.J.A wrote the paper.

Data availability

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are either shown in the manuscript or available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41522-021-00201-y.

References

  • 1.Thomas V, Loret JF, Jousset M, Greub G. Biodiversity of amoebae and amoebae-resisting bacteria in a drinking water treatment plant. Environ. Microbiol. 2008;10:2728–2745. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2008.01693.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ashbolt NJ. Microbial contamination of drinking water and human health from community water systems. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015;2:95–106. doi: 10.1007/s40572-014-0037-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rodriguez-Zaragoza S. Ecology of free-living amoebae. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 1994;20:225–241. doi: 10.3109/10408419409114556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Abdul Majid MA, et al. Pathogenic waterborne free-living amoebae: an update from selected Southeast Asian countries. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169448. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Rowbotham TJ. Current views on the relationships between amoebae, legionellae and man. Isr. J. Med Sci. 1986;22:678–689. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Cunha BA, Burillo A, Bouza E. Legionnaires’ disease. Lancet. 2016;387:376–385. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60078-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Molmeret M, Horn M, Wagner M, Santic M, Abu Kwaik Y. Amoebae as training grounds for intracellular bacterial pathogens. Appl Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:20–28. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.1.20-28.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Cassini, A. et al. Impact of infectious diseases on population health using incidence-based disability-adjusted life years (DALYs): results from the burden of communicable diseases in Europe study, European Union and European economic area countries, 2009 to 2013. Eur. Surveill. 23, 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2018.23.16.17-00454 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 9.La Scola B, Marrie TJ, Auffray JP, Raoult D. Mimivirus in pneumonia patients. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2005;11:449–452. doi: 10.3201/eid1103.040538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scheid P, Schwarzenberger R. Acanthamoeba spp. as vehicle and reservoir of adenoviruses. Parasitol. Res. 2012;111:479–485. doi: 10.1007/s00436-012-2828-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Atanasova ND, et al. Persistence of infectious enterovirus within free-living amoebae - a novel waterborne risk pathway? Water Res. 2018;144:204–214. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.07.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Folkins MA, Dey R, Ashbolt NJ. Interactions between human reovirus and free-Living amoebae: implications for enteric virus disinfection and aquatic persistence. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54:10201–10206. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c02896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bayham, J. & Fenichel, E. P. Impact of school closures for COVID-19 on the US health-care workforce and net mortality: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health, 10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30082-7 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 14.Nam HH, Ison MG. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in adults. BMJ. 2019;366:l5021. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Haber N. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly adults. Med Mal. Infect. 2018;48:377–382. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2018.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Simonsen L, Viboud C. Respiratory syncytial virus infection in elderly adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;353:422–423. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200507283530422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Collins PL, Graham BS. Viral and host factors in human respiratory syncytial virus pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2008;82:2040–2055. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01625-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Drysdale SB, Sande CJ, Green CA, Pollard AJ. RSV vaccine use-the missing data. Expert Rev. Vaccines. 2016;15:149–152. doi: 10.1586/14760584.2016.1114419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhu Z, et al. Extra-pulmonary viral shedding in H7N9 avian influenza patients. J. Clin. Virol. 2015;69:30–32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2015.05.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chan MC, et al. Seasonal influenza A virus in feces of hospitalized adults. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2011;17:2038–2042. doi: 10.3201/eid1711.110205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.von Linstow ML, et al. Excretion patterns of human metapneumovirus and respiratory syncytial virus among young children. Eur. J. Med. Res. 2006;11:329–335. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to imageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat. Methods. 2012;9:671–675. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bachi T, Howe C. Morphogenesis and ultrastructure of respiratory syncytial virus. J. Virol. 1973;12:1173–1180. doi: 10.1128/JVI.12.5.1173-1180.1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bajorek M, et al. The Thr205 phosphorylation site within respiratory syncytial virus matrix (M) protein modulates M oligomerization and virus production. J. Virol. 2014;88:6380–6393. doi: 10.1128/JVI.03856-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liljeroos L, Krzyzaniak MA, Helenius A, Butcher SJ. Architecture of respiratory syncytial virus revealed by electron cryotomography. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:11133–11138. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1309070110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sastre P, Oomens AG, Wertz GW. The stability of human respiratory syncytial virus is enhanced by incorporation of the baculovirus GP64 protein. Vaccine. 2007;25:5025–5033. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.04.066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Oomens AG, Megaw AG, Wertz GW. Infectivity of a human respiratory syncytial virus lacking the SH, G, and F proteins is efficiently mediated by the vesicular stomatitis virus G protein. J. Virol. 2003;77:3785–3798. doi: 10.1128/JVI.77.6.3785-3798.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Robinson SM, et al. Coxsackievirus B exits the host cell in shed microvesicles displaying autophagosomal markers. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10:e1004045. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen YH, et al. Phosphatidylserine vesicles enable efficient en bloc transmission of enteroviruses. Cell. 2015;160:619–630. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Bird SW, Maynard ND, Covert MW, Kirkegaard K. Nonlytic viral spread enhanced by autophagy components. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:13081–13086. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1401437111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang ZW, Li ZL, Yuan S. The role of secretory autophagy in zika virus transfer through the placental barrier. Front Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016;6:206. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2016.00206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Feng Z, et al. A pathogenic picornavirus acquires an envelope by hijacking cellular membranes. Nature. 2013;496:367–371. doi: 10.1038/nature12029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Altan-Bonnet N, Chen YH. Intercellular transmission of viral populations with vesicles. J. Virol. 2015;89:12242–12244. doi: 10.1128/JVI.01452-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mutsafi, Y. & Altan-Bonnet, N. Enterovirus transmission by secretory autophagy. Viruses10, 10.3390/v10030139 (2018). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 35.Borderia AV, et al. Group selection and contribution of minority variants during virus adaptation determines virus fitness and phenotype. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11:e1004838. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Garcia A, et al. Potentially pathogenic free-living amoebae (FLA) isolated in Spanish wastewater treatment plants. Environ. Microbiol Rep. 2011;3:622–626. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2011.00271.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Fernandez-Cassi X, et al. Evaluation of the microbiological quality of reclaimed water produced from a lagooning system. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2016;23:16816–16833. doi: 10.1007/s11356-016-6812-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mulec J, Dietersdorfer E, Ustunturk-Onan M, Walochnik J. Acanthamoeba and other free-living amoebae in bat guano, an extreme habitat. Parasitol. Res. 2016;115:1375–1383. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4871-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Santiana M, et al. Vesicle-cloaked virus clusters are optimal units for inter-organismal viral transmission. Cell Host Microbe. 2018;24:208–220. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.07.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Swuste P, Corn M, Goelzer B. Hazard prevention and control in the work environment. Report of a WHO meeting. Int J. Occup. Med. Environ. Health. 1995;8:7–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Allegra S, et al. Characterization of aerosols containing legionella generated upon nebulization. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:33998. doi: 10.1038/srep33998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Boratto PV, et al. Amoebas as mimivirus bunkers: increased resistance to UV light, heat and chemical biocides when viruses are carried by amoeba hosts. Arch. Virol. 2014;159:1039–1043. doi: 10.1007/s00705-013-1924-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Altan-Bonnet N. Extracellular vesicles are the trojan horses of viral infection. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2016;32:77–81. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2016.05.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Altan-Bonnet N, Perales C, Domingo E. Extracellular vesicles: vehicles of en bloc viral transmission. Virus Res. 2019;265:143–149. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2019.03.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Yu IT, Qiu H, Tse LA, Wong TW. Severe acute respiratory syndrome beyond amoy gardens: completing the incomplete legacy. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;58:683–686. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Liu Y, et al. Aerodynamic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 in two wuhan hospitals. Nature. 2020;582:557–560. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2271-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Kwilas S, et al. Respiratory syncytial virus grown in vero cells contains a truncated attachment protein that alters its infectivity and dependence on glycosaminoglycans. J. Virol. 2009;83:10710–10718. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00986-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Reed LJ, Muench H. A simple method of estimating fifty percent endpoints. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 1938;27:493–497. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reporting Summary (67.7KB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data sets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are either shown in the manuscript or available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from NPJ Biofilms and Microbiomes are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES