Abstract
Anti-CD47/PD-L1 immunotherapies aiming to enhance antitumor immunity are being intensively investigated and show promising results in cancer therapy; however, not all patients treated with these new drugs respond. Thus, developing new immunotherapy agents or combination treatments to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy is an urgent challenge. Here, we found that LSD1 knockdown directly downregulated the expression of CD47 and PD-L1 through upregulating H3K4me2 levels in the CD47 and CD274 promoter regions. In addition, the LSD1/wild-type p53/miR-34a signaling axis was also involved in the regulation of CD47/PD-L1 expression by targeting the 3′ untranslated regions (3′UTRs) of CD47/PD-L1. Further, the results showed that an LSD1 inhibitor (ORY-1001) combined with anti-CD47/PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies inhibited tumor growth in an established subcutaneous xenograft model more effectively than a single blockade strategy. Collectively, these findings indicate that LSD1 inhibition enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PD-L1/CD47 blockade by reducing CD47 and PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer.
Subject terms: Tumour immunology, Cell signalling
Introduction
Cervical cancer is one of the three main malignant tumors of the female reproductive system worldwide, especially in China and other developing countries. Persistent high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection is responsible for approximately 99.7% of all cervical cancers1. The major oncogenes E6 and E7 synergistically contribute to the progression of cervical cancer by inhibiting the activity of important tumor-suppressor proteins, including p53, retinoblastoma family members, and proteins containing PDZ domains2. Most patients with early disease (IA–IIA) are treated with surgery or radical radiotherapy. Locally advanced cervical cancer (IIB–IVA), which accounts for about two-thirds of all cases, has a 5-year survival rate of 40–50% despite appropriate multidisciplinary management.
Cancer immunotherapies, widely heralded as transformational for many cancers, are becoming viable options for selected categories of cancer patients. CD47, which is widely expressed on the surface of tumor cells, binds to SIRPα on the surface of macrophages to prevent them from phagocytizing tumor cells by creating a “do not eat me” signal3. Similarly, the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1; or CD274, B7-H1) is a critical “do not find me” signal to the adaptive immune system4. A certain correlation between these two seemingly independent signaling pathways has also been indicated. It was demonstrated that CD47 blockade therapy could activate the immune response of CD8+ T to tumors5, while PD-1 blockade therapy simultaneously promoted phagocytosis of tumor-associated macrophages6,7. CD47 and PD-L1 blockades are revolutionizing the treatment of various cancer types, but not all patients treated with these new drugs respond. Thus, developing new immunotherapy agents or combination treatments to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy is an important challenge.
LSD1, the first histone demethylase to be discovered, is dysregulated in various tumors and is strongly correlated with the malignant progression of these tumors. Inhibition or knockdown of LSD1 has been demonstrated to suppress malignant biological behaviors of some solid tumors, including cervical cancer2,8. Inhibition of LSD1 has been proved to enhance the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy in melanoma and breast cancer9,10, thereby indicating a new direction for research on LSD1. However, the role of LSD1 in the immune microenvironment of cervical cancer is still unclear and requires further research. Immunotherapy is considered to be a new approach to the treatment of advanced cervical cancer, with some clinical trials showing encouraging results11. Meanwhile, in order to further enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy, combined treatment schemes have increasingly been investigated in clinical trials.
In our study, we validated the increase in expression of LSD1 during the progression of cervical cancer and confirmed the enhanced therapeutic effect against cervical cancer when combining CD47/PD-L1 blockade therapy with an LSD1 inhibitor. In addition, the LSD1-H3K4me2-CD47/PD-L1 and LSD1-wtp53-miR-34a-CD47/PD-L1 axes were found to explain the role of LSD1 in mediating cervical cancer immune evasion.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and cell culture
Human cervical cancer cell lines SiHa and C33A were initially obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC; Manassas, VA) and were maintained in our laboratory. Cells were cultured in 1:1 Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium/F12 (Gibco, Auckland, New Zealand) with 5% penicillin–streptomycin and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). In addition, TC-1 cells transformed with HPV16 E6 and E7 were purchased from Shanghai Institutes for Cell Resource Centre, Chinese Academy of Sciences and cultured in complete RPMI 1640 (Gibco, Auckland, New Zealand) with penicillin–streptomycin and 10% FBS (Gibco, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). All of the above cell types were cultured at 37 °C in a cell incubator with 5% CO2.
RNA interference (RNAi) and gene transfection
The LSD1 small hairpin RNA (shRNA) plasmids were designed and synthesized by Genomeditech (Shanghai, China). The target sequences were as follows: 1# CCGGGCACCTTATAACAGTGATACTCTCGAGAGTATCACTGTTATAAGGTGCTTTTT and 2# CCGGCCAACAATTAGAAGCACCTTACTCGAGTAAGGTGCTTCTAATTGTTGGTTTTTG. The small interfering RNA (siRNA) duplexes that targeted p53 were 5′-CTACATGTGTAACAGTTCCUU-3′ and 5′-GGAACTGTTACACATGTAGUU-3′. An RNAi negative control (NC) was also used. Transfection was performed using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies), following the manufacturer’s protocol.
Western blotting
All cells were lysed in 1× sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) loading buffer. Lysates containing equal amounts of protein were loaded onto each lane, followed by separation using 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Proteins were then transferred to 0.45-µm polyvinylidene fluoride membranes. The membranes were blocked at room temperature for 1 h in 5% FBS solution and subsequently incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight. The membranes were then incubated with secondary antibody for 1 h at room temperature and visualized using electrochemiluminescence. GAPDH was used as the loading control to normalize the intensity of the target protein bands. CD47 antibody (ab175388), PD-L1 antibody (ab213524), wild-type p53 antibody (ab26), mutant p53 antibody (ab32049), p21 antibody (ab109520), GAPDH antibody (ab9485), and goat anti-rabbit IgG H&L (ab6721) were purchased from Abcam.
Flow cytometric assay
Single-cell suspensions were incubated with IgG antibody (17-4714-42, eBioscience) or CD47 (17-0479-42, eBioscience)/PD-L1(17-5983-42, eBioscience) antibody at 4 °C for 30 min in the dark. The cells were then washed using phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min. Finally, the cells were resuspended and protein expression was analyzed on a FACSCalibur flow cytometer.
Immunohistochemistry (IHC)
Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical specimens representing a wide range of cervical disease processes, including 15 normal cervical tissue, 85 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) tissues, and 101 cervical cancer tissues, were collected from the case files of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Affiliated Shanghai General Hospital between 2008 and 2018. The collection of human specimens and all experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Each section was evaluated based on the percentage of positively stained cells (0–4) and the intensity of the staining (0–3). Finally, these two scores were multiplied together, giving a total score of up to 12 points. The higher the score, the more protein the sample expressed.
Chromatin immunoprecipitation quantitative real-time PCR (ChIP-qPCR)
ChIP assays were performed as previously2 described. Briefly, cells were collected after cross-linking with 1% formaldehyde and then disrupted with ultrasound and incubated with H3K4me2 antibodies overnight. The immunoprecipitates were washed continuously to remove non-specific binding. After reverse cross-linking, the DNA samples were purified and analyzed by Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR). The specific primer sequences for the CD47/CD274 promoters are given in Supplementary Data 1.
Quantitative real-time PCR
Total RNA from cell lines was extracted using TRIzol reagent (TaKaRa, Dalian, China). Complementary DNA was synthesized with random primers or microRNA-specific stem-loop primers (RiboBio) using a PrimeScript RT Reagent Kit (TaKaRa). Subsequently, qRT-PCR was performed with SYBR Premix Ex Taq (TaKaRa) on a 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Mannheim, Germany). The 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate relative expression levels using GAPDH or U6 as the endogenous control. The mRNA primer sequences are listed in Supplementary Data 2.
Luciferase reporter assay
The 3′ untranslated region (3′UTR) of CD47/PD-L1 containing the wild-type or mutated binding sites of miR-34a were generated by Genomeditech (Shanghai, China). Dual-reporter luciferase assays were performed in the SiHa and HEK-293T cell lines. CD47/PD-L1 reporter constructs and miR-34a mimic or miR-NC were transfected into cells using Lipofectamine 3000, and luciferase activity was measured in cell lysates 24 h after transfection using a Luciferase Assay Kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
Animal study
Six-to-7-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (Animal Breeding Facility of the China Academy of Science, Shanghai, China) were housed and maintained in accordance with the standards of the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH Publications No. 8023, revised 1978). All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. TC-1 cells were trypsinized and suspended in PBS, then 5 × 106 cells were injected subcutaneously into mice to investigate tumorigenicity. Mice were randomly divided into four groups with four mice for each group. ORY-1001 (50 mg/kg) and anti-CD47 (100 µg/mouse)/PD-L1 (300 µg/mouse) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) were administered intraperitoneally three times per week from the fifth day after tumor implantation. Three to 4 weeks after implantation, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation after inhalation of isoflurane, and the tumors were removed, dissected, and weighed blindly.
Statistical analysis
Values are expressed as mean ± SD. Analysis of variance and two-tailed Student’s t tests were used to calculate p values. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
LSD1 expression is positively correlated with CD47/PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer cells and tissues
After the LSD1 silencing plasmid was transfected into SiHa and C33A cells, significant downregulation of CD47/PD-L1 protein expression was observed by western blotting (Fig. 1A) and flow cytometry (Fig. 1B). To further confirm the correlation between LSD1 expression and CD47/PD-L1 expression, we performed 201 instances of immunohistochemistry staining in tissue microarrays, including normal cervical tissues, CIN tissues, and cervical cancer tissues. The protein expression (Fig. 1C) and positive ratio (Supplementary Data 3) of LSD1 increased steadily, as did those of the CD47 and PD-L1 proteins, in the progression from normal cervical to CIN and then to cervical cancer. In addition, it was apparent that cervical cancer tissues with high LSD1 expression also had high CD47/PD-L1 expression (Fig. 1D). Consistently, Spearman correlation analysis showed that the expression of LSD1 was positively correlated with that of CD47 and PD-L1 (Fig. 1E). Thus, the IHC results further validate our research from a clinical perspective.
LSD1-mediated H3K4 demethylation in the CD47/CD274 promoter region
To further access the epigenetic mechanisms responsible for the downregulation of CD47 and PD-L1 expression after LSD1 knockdown in cervical cancer cells, we obtained visualization data of histone ChIP sequencing (ChIP-Seq) from the ENCODE database (https://www.encodeproject.org/) and observed enrichment of H3K4me2 marks in the CD47/CD274 promoter region in various tumor cells (Fig. 2A). In the subsequent ChIP-Seq, enriched H3K4me2 marks were also detected in the CD47/CD274 promoter region in SiHa cells, consistent with the ENCODE data (Fig. 2B). For further confirmation, SiHa and C33A cells were then transfected with scrambled and LSD1-specific shRNA-coding lentivirus, and stable cells were selected. In addition, five specific ChIP-qPCR primers targeting the CD47/CD274 promoter region were designed (Fig. 2C, D). ChIP analysis subsequently showed that silencing LSD1 expression markedly increased H3K4me2 levels in the CD47/CD274 promoter regions compared with no-load stable SiHa and C33A cells (Fig. 2E, F). This suggested that CD47 and PD-L1 expression could be directly regulated through LSD1-mediated H3K4 demethylation in cervical cancer.
LSD1 silencing reduces CD47/PD-L1 protein expression by upregulation of miR-34a
We next asked whether certain upregulated microRNAs might target CD47/PD-L1, resulting in translational suppression of CD47/PD-L1 mRNA in cells transfected with LSD1-shRNA. Therefore, we conducted microRNA sequencing and analyzed differentially regulated microRNAs of SiHa cells transfected with shRNA-NC or shRNA-LSD1 (Fig. 3A). When LSD1 was downregulated, miR-34a expression was strongly upregulated; this was further confirmed by qRT-PCR in SiHa cells (Fig. 3B). However, no significant change in the expression of miR-34a was observed in C33A cells after LSD1 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 1A).
In order to verify the regulation of CD47/PD-L1 by miR-34a, miR-34a mimics and inhibitors were transfected into both SiHa and C33A cells. Consistent with our prediction, PD-L1 mRNA was significantly reduced after transfection of miR-34a mimics, whereas no significant change was observed after inhibition of miR-34a (Fig. 3C, D). There was no significant change in CD47 mRNA levels after transfection with either miR-34a mimics or inhibitors (Fig. 3C, D). However, the protein expression of CD47/PD-L1 was decreased when miR-34a was overexpressed in SiHa and C33A cells, and an increase in CD47/PD-L1 protein was observed due to the inhibition of miR-34a (Fig. 3E, F). We predicted that CD47/PD-L1 is a potential target of miR-34a, given the considerable complementarity between the seed region of miR-34a and the 3′UTR of CD47/PD-L1 (Fig. 4A, B). Finally, dual-reporter luciferase assays were carried out in SiHa and HEK-293T cells to determine whether miR-34a could bind to the 3′UTRs of CD47 and PD-L1. Transfection with the miR-34a mimic reduced the luciferase activity of the construct compared with mimic NC-transfected cells. Meanwhile, miR-34a showed no effect on the luciferase activity of site-directed mutagenesis of the putative miR-34a-binding sites in these constructs (Fig. 4C, D).
LSD1 silencing increased miR-34a expression through targeting wild-type p53
We next asked how LSD1 plays its part in the regulation of miR-34a. It is generally known that the miR-34 family is a direct transcriptional target of wild-type p53, and miR-34 dysregulation has been hypothesized to be involved in the development of some cancers containing wild-type p5312,13. Wild-type p53 is present in a stable complex with LSD1 according to previous observations14. In addition, it has been shown that the activity of wild-type p53 and the transcription it targets are repressed by LSD1 through specifically demethylating both K370me1 and K370me2 in vitro14. Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that wild-type p53 may be the key component involved in LSD1-mediated miR-34a expression in cervical cancer cells.
We further verified that LSD1 formed a stable complex with wild-type p53 in SiHa cells (Fig. 5A). In addition, increases in both mRNA and protein expression of wild-type p53 in SiHa cells were observed after LSD1 knockdown (Fig. 5B). Meanwhile, there was no significant change in either the expression of mutant p53 mRNA or protein in C33A cells after LSD1 knockdown (Supplementary Fig. 1B). We further quantified the strength of the correlation between p53 and miR-34a expression using The Cancer Genome Atlas cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (TCGA-CESC) database. As shown in Fig. 5C, a positive correlation of p53 mRNA with miR-34a was found in the TCGA-CESC database. In addition, decreased miR-34a expression was observed by silencing wild-type p53 using siRNA-p53 in SiHa cells (Fig. 5D), and miR-34a expression increased in a dose-dependent manner when p53 was stimulated in SiHa cells using nutlin-3a and doxorubicin (Fig. 5E). Therefore, we speculated that LSD1 silencing increased miR-34a expression through targeting wild-type p53.
LSD1 inhibitor enhances the efficacy of anti-CD47/PD-L1 immunotherapy therapy in a cervical cancer allograft model in vivo
To evaluate whether a combination of LSD1 inhibitors and anti-mouse CD47 mAb could reduce tumor burden in C57BL/6 mice subcutaneously inoculated with the TC-1 cells, 5 days after implantation, LSD1 inhibitors along with anti-mouse CD47 mAb were administered intraperitoneally three times per week. Compared with the NC animals, administration of an LSD1 inhibitor or anti-mouse CD47 mAb alone inhibited the growth of tumors. The combined use of the LSD1 inhibitor and anti-mouse CD47 mAb significantly enhanced the inhibition of tumor growth (Fig. 6A). Differences in appearance (Fig. 6B) and weight (Fig. 6C) of tumors among the four groups were also observed. Similar results were obtained with a combination of LSD1 inhibitor and anti-mouse PD-L1 mAb (Fig. 6D–F).
Discussion
LSD1 is highly expressed in various tumors and is closely related to tumor progression. It is capable of specifically removing methyl groups from monomethylated and demethylated histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4me1/2) and lysine 9 (H3K9me1/2). It is well recognized that the innate immune regulator CD47 and the adaptive immune checkpoint PD-L1 regulate tumor immune responses through the SIRPα/CD47 and PD-1/PD-L1 pathways, respectively. Tumor immunotherapies based on CD47/PD-L1 blockade have shown strong antitumor effects and have been demonstrated to prolong survival when used in the treatment of various tumors.
Our study demonstrated that LSD1 knockdown could lead to decreased protein expression of CD47/PD-L1. Meanwhile, the expression of LSD1 in cervical cancer tissues showed a highly positive correlation with CD47/PD-L1. These results preliminarily demonstrated the regulation of CD47/PD-L1 expression by LSD1.
Afterwards, we conducted in-depth verification of the mechanism by which LSD1 regulates CD47/PD-L1 expression. ChIP-Seq traces generated from the ENCODE database showed a large accumulation of H3K4me2 in the CD47/CD274 promoter regions of many tumor cells. Similar results were observed in SiHa cells in subsequent ChIP-Seq experiments. Moreover, H3K4me2 levels in the CD47/CD274 promoters of SiHa and C33A cells further increased after LSD1 knockdown, suggesting a direct regulatory effect of LSD1-mediated H3K4 demethylation on CD47 and PD-L1 expression in cervical cancer.
In addition, miR-34a, which is predicted to target the 3′UTR of CD47/PD-L1, increased significantly after LSD1 knockdown in SiHa cells. Thereafter, the regulation of CD47/PD-L1 protein expression by miR-34a was confirmed by transfecting miR-34a mimics or inhibitors into cervical cancer cells. Finally, dual-reporter luciferase assays in SiHa and HEK-293T cells confirmed that miR-34a could bind to the 3′UTR of CD47/PD-L1 and suppress the expression of CD47/PD-L1.
It was further verified that LSD1 formed a stable complex with wild-type p53 in SiHa cells and increases in both mRNA and protein expression of wild-type p53 in SiHa cells were observed after LSD1 knockdown. A positive correlation of p53 mRNA with miR-34a was demonstrated by silencing and stimulating wild-type p53 in SiHa cells. Therefore, we identified a crucial role of wild-type p53 in LSD1-mediated miR-34a expression in cervical cancer cells.
Based on these results, we treated C57BL/6 mice bearing TC-1 tumors to explore whether LSD1 inhibitors could enhance the efficacy of CD47/PD-L1 blockade therapy in vivo. The results showed that LSD1 inhibitors combined with anti-mouse CD47/PD-L1 mAb significantly inhibited tumor growth and altered the tumor microenvironment, indicating that LSD1 may contribute to tumor immune escape through the suppression of immune surveillance against tumor cells. After LSD1 knockdown, the loss of “do not eat me” and “do not find me” signals promotes immune activation and thus leads to inhibition of tumor growth.
In conclusion, our study revealed that LSD1 contributes to cervical cancer immune escape through regulation of CD47/PD-L1 protein expression. In addition, the LSD1-H3K4me2-CD47/PD-L1 and LSD1-wtp53-miR-34a-CD47/PD-L1 signaling axes were demonstrated to explain the direct and indirect regulation of CD47/PD-L1 by LSD1. Moreover, inhibition of LSD1 in combination with anti-mouse CD47/PD-L1 mAb could significantly suppress the growth of an allograft model by enhancing the immunogenicity of cervical cancer in vivo. In short, these results indicate that LSD1 is a potential target for enhancing the efficacy of immunotherapy for cervical cancer in the future.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81971340), National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC1302900), and Scientific and Technological Project of Songjiang, Shanghai (No. 18SJKJGG14).
Author contributions
S.X. made substantial contributions to analysis and interpretation of data and was involved in drafting the manuscript and revising it critically for important intellectual content; X.W. made substantial contributions to conception, design and acquisition of data; Y.Y., Y.L., and S.W. gave final approval of the version to be published and agreed to be accountable for all aspects of the work. All authors read and approved the final paper.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The collection of human specimens and all experiments were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, and written informed consent was obtained from all subjects in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. C57BL/6 mice were housed and maintained in accordance with the standards of the National Institutes of Health guide for the care and use of laboratory animals (NIH Publications No. 8023, revised 1978). All animal experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. At the end of the experiment, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation after inhalation of isoflurane.
Footnotes
Edited by H.-U. Simon
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Shengjie Xu, Xiaoyun Wang
Contributor Information
Yongbing Yang, Email: yybvsywz@163.com.
Yanli Li, Email: liecho121@126.com.
Sufang Wu, Email: wsf_sfph@sjtu.edu.cn.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41419-021-03556-4.
References
- 1.Walboomers JM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J. Pathol. 1999;189:12–19. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199909)189:1<12::AID-PATH431>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu Y, et al. LSD1 binds to HPV16 E7 and promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in cervical cancer by demethylating histones at the Vimentin promoter. Oncotarget. 2017;8:11329–11342. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matozaki T, Murata Y, Okazawa H, Ohnishi H. Functions and molecular mechanisms of the CD47–SIRPα signalling pathway. Trends Cell Biol. 2009;19:72–80. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2008.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Okazaki T, Honjo T. PD-1 and PD-1 ligands: from discovery to clinical application. Int. Immunol. 2007;19:813–824. doi: 10.1093/intimm/dxm057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tao H, Qian P, Wang F, Yu H, Guo Y. Targeting CD47 enhances the efficacy of anti-PD-1 and CTLA-4 in an esophageal squamous cell cancer preclinical model. Oncol. Res. 2017;25:1579–1587. doi: 10.3727/096504017X14900505020895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Santoni M, et al. Triple negative breast cancer: key role of tumor-associated macrophages in regulating the activity of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents. Biochim. Biophys. Rev. Cancer. 2018;1869:78–84. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gordon SR, et al. PD-1 expression by tumour-associated macrophages inhibits phagocytosis and tumour immunity. Nature. 2017;545:495–499. doi: 10.1038/nature22396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hayami S, et al. Overexpression of LSD1 contributes to human carcinogenesis through chromatin regulation in various cancers. Int. J. Cancer. 2011;128:574–586. doi: 10.1002/ijc.25349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Qin Y, et al. Inhibition of histone lysine-specific demethylase 1 elicits breast tumor immunity and enhances antitumor efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade. Oncogene. 2019;38:390–405. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0451-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sheng W, et al. LSD1 ablation stimulates anti-tumor immunity and enables checkpoint blockade. Cell. 2018;174:549–563. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.05.052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Eskander RN, Tewari KS. Immunotherapy: an evolving paradigm in the treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Clin. Ther. 2015;37:20–38. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2014.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chang TC, et al. Transactivation of miR-34a by p53 broadly influences gene expression and promotes apoptosis. Mol. Cell. 2007;26:745–752. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bommer GT, et al. p53-mediated activation of miRNA34 candidate tumor-suppressor genes. Curr. Biol. 2007;17:1298–1307. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Huang J, et al. p53 is regulated by the lysine demethylase LSD1. Nature. 2007;449:105–108. doi: 10.1038/nature06092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.