Skip to main content
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Mar 18;553:25–29. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2021.03.068

A tissue- and gender-specific regulation of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 by p53 in pigs

Yue Zhang 1,1, Guanglin Niu 1,1, Tatiana Flisikowska 1, Angelika Schnieke 1, Krzysztof Flisikowski 1,
PMCID: PMC7969875  PMID: 33756342

Abstract

The current COVID-19 pandemic is caused by infections with the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). A sex-bias has been observed, with increased susceptibility and mortality in male compared to female patients. The gene for the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 is located on the X chromosome.

We previously generated TP53 mutant pigs that exhibit a sex-specific patho-phenotype due to altered regulation of numerous X chromosome genes. In this study, we explored the effect of p53 deficiency on ACE2 expression in pigs. First, we identified the p53 binding site in the ACE2 promoter and could show its regulatory effect on ACE2 expression by luciferase assay in porcine primary kidney fibroblast cells. Later, quantitative PCR and western blot showed tissue- and gender-specific expression changes of ACE2 and its truncated isoform in p53-deficient pigs. We believe these findings will broaden the knowledge on ACE2 regulation and COVID-19 susceptibility.

Keywords: p53, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, ACE2

1. Introduction

The first outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), was reported in Wuhan, China, in December 2019 [1,2]. The most common symptoms of COVID-19 are manifested by fever, dyspnea, dry cough, myalgia, diarrhea, and pneumonia [3,4]. In severe cases, symptoms like acute respiratory distress syndrome, arrhythmia, acute cardiac injury, and acute kidney injury may occur, which likely can lead to death [3]. SARS-CoV-2 shares 79.5% sequence identity with SARS-CoV, both of which recognize angiotensin-converting enzyme-2 (ACE2) as their host receptor to cell entry [5]. The binding affinity of SARS-CoV-2 to the ACE2 receptor is 10–20 times higher than that of SARS-CoV [6]. The expression of ACE2 varies greatly between individuals [7], but higher ACE2 concentration in plasma of men than women was reported [8]. Susceptibility of spermatogonial cells and prostate endocrine cells to SARS-CoV-2 infection also suggests male-specific vulnerabilities [9]. Recently, Onabajo et al. found a novel truncated ACE2 isoform, which likely maintains ACE2 enzymatic function in the renin-angiotensin system [10].

Cancer patients with COVID-19 disease more often have severer symptoms though no clear association between cancer and COVID-19 infection has so far been found [11]. The p53 transcription factor is a tumour suppressor and the TP53 is the most mutated gene in human cancer [12,13]. Loss of p53 deregulates several genes located on the X chromosome [14]. ACE2 is located on the X chromosome in mammals and could alter the expression of p53 in pulmonary endothelial cells after lung injury [15].

In the study, we explored a tissue- and gender-specific expression of ACE2 in p53-deficient pigs.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Animals

Two months old homozygous flTP53 R167H/R167H female and male pigs (n = 3 of each gender) and matched wild type (WT) pigs (n = 3 of each gender) were produced in our research farm. The generation of the flTP53 R167H pig line has been previously described [16]. Briefly, the flTP53 R167H pigs carry a Cre-removable transcriptional stop signal in intron 1 and an oncogenic mutation R167H in exon 5. The intact allele lacks TP53 expression. Tissue samples from various organs (n = 13) were collected post mortem, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80 °C. All experiments on animals conformed to the German Animal Welfare Act and European Union Normative for Care and Use of Experimental Animals and were approved by the Government of Upper Bavaria (55.2-1-54-2532-6-13).

2.2. Vector construction

The porcine ACE2 promoter sequence was obtained from GenBank (NM_001123070.1). The promoter sequence from −787bp to +24bp related to the transcription start site (TSS), which included the in silico (JASPAR development server) predicted p53 binding site, was amplified by GoTaq DNA polymerase (Promega, Germany) with forward primer: CCTTGTGACCTTGGCTGAGT and reverse primer: AAGGAGCCAGAAAGAGCCTG. Two expression vectors were designed that carried luciferase reporter gene driven by ACE2 promoter with (ACE2p53-con) and without TP53 binding site (ACE2p53-ko) (Fig. 1 a). The predicted TP53 binding site (−317bp to −303bp) in the ACE2p53-ko vector was removed from the ACE2 sequence by overlap extension PCR. The two ACE2 promoter variants were incorporated in front of the reporter gene by the NEBuilder HiFi DNA Assembly Cloning Kit (NEB, USA). The TK promoter served as an internal control for normalising the activity of the ACE2 promoter.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Effects of p53 on the porcine ACE2 promoter activity. (A) The location of the predicted with JASPAR p53 binding site in ACE2 sequence. The porcine ACE2 promoter sequence was obtained from GenBank (NM_001123070.1). The predicted TP53 binding site is located between −317bp and −303bp related to the transcription start site. (B) The relative luciferase activities of ACE2p53-con and ACE2p53-ko vectors in porcine kidney fibroblast cells. The luciferase activities were measured 36 h post-transfection.

2.3. Cell culture and treatment

Porcine kidney fibroblast (PKDNF) cells were isolated from the kidney of WT pig (German Landrace). Cells were cultured in DMEM medium (Gibco, USA) supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (Gibco, USA), 2 mM L-Glutamine, non-essential amino acids, and incubated at 37 °C with 5% CO2 in a humid environment. The PKDNF cells were transfected with ACE2p53-con and ACE2p53-ko expression vectors by Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection Reagent (Thermo Fischer). 36 h post-transfection, cells were lysed with passive lysis buffer, and luciferase activity was measured using the Firefly & Renilla Luciferase Single Tube Assay Kit (Biotium) by FLUOstar Omega (BMG Labtech).

2.4. Quantitative PCR

Total RNA from all tissue samples was isolated using RNA Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and 500 ng of total RNA was reverse transcribed using Superscript IV (Thermo Fisher). SYBRGreen PCR Master Mix (Kapa Biosystems Pty, South Africa) was used for the quantitative PCR (qPCR). Following qPCR primers were used: ACE2_forward: AAGGATATTCGAGGAGGCTG; ACE2_reverse: CAGGAAGTCATCCATCGTCA; GAPDH_forward: CTCAACGACCACTTCGTCAA, GAPDH_reverse: CCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCAAAT.

2.5. Western blot

Protein was isolated by NP40 buffer with protease inhibitor and the concentration was measured by a Bradford Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich). An equal amount of proteins was loaded on 12% SDS-PAGE gel. ACE2 antibody (AF933; R&D Systems/Bio-Techne) was diluted at 1:500 and GAPDH antibody (G8795; Sigma-Aldrich) was diluted at 1:1000. To ensure accuracy, the proteins from female and male animals were loaded in the same chamber and transferred to the same membrane. The blots were exposed to the same film to keep the exposure time equal.

2.6. Statistics

Experiments in this study were conducted in three independent repeats. SPSS 22.0 was used to calculate the p values with the Student T-test. ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01.

3. Results

3.1. Effect of p53 on the activity of ACE2 promoter

To explore the regulation of ACE2 by p53 transcription factor, porcine PKDNF cells were transfected with ACE2p53-con and ACE2p53-ko dual luciferase expression vectors. The relative luciferase activity was approx. twofold higher (p < 0.05) in PKDNF transfected with ACE2p53-ko vector, which lacks the p53 binding site, than in those transfected with ACE2p53-con (Fig. 1b). This finding indicated that the predicted p53 binding site is involved in the regulation of ACE2 in pig kidney.

3.2. The expression profiles of ACE2

To get a broader picture for the regulation of ACE2 by p53, we analysed the ACE2 expression in 13 different organs (colon, kidney, heart, liver, lung, spleen, small intestine, stomach, muscle, lymph node, esophagus, aorta, and brain) in female and male flTP53 R167H and WT pigs by qPCR and western blot. Since the lung is the main target organ of COVID-19 [17], the ACE2 mRNA expression was normalised to the expression in the lung of female WT pigs. Overall, the mRNA expression of ACE2 was higher in female than male WT pigs, with the highest levels in the kidney and small intestine (Fig. 2 a and b). However, the ACE2 protein expression in the kidney and small intestine was higher in WT males (Fig. 2c and d). This discrepancy can be explained by the posttranslational ACE2 modifications. Notably, we detected two ACE2 isoforms, the full length (∼120 kD) and the truncated (∼58 kD). The ACE2 full-length isoform was expressed in most of the tissues in females, and only in kidney, liver and small intestine of male WT pigs (Fig. 2c and d).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

A tissue- and gender-specific expression profile of ACE2 in pigs. Quantitative RT-PCR analysis of different tissues (n = 13) from female (A) and male (B) two-month-old flTP53R176H knockout (n = 3) and wild type (n = 3) pigs. Representative western blots showing ACE2 protein expression in different tissues (n = 13) from female (C) and male (D) two-month-old flTP53R176H knockout and wild type pigs. The full length (120 kD) and the truncated (58 kD) ACE2 isoforms were detected. Quantitative measurements of the full-length ACE2 protein expression in kidney and small intestine from female (E) and male (F) two-month-old flTP53R176H knockout (n = 3) and wild type (n = 3) pigs. The GAPDH expression was used as the reference. ∗P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01.

In flTP53 R167H pigs, we observed tissue- and gender-specific ACE2 expression changes (Fig. 2a–d). In flTP53 R167H females, the expression of the full-length ACE2 isoform was higher than WT females in most tissues, particularly in small intestine and kidney (Fig. 2c, e). In flTP53 R167H males, the expression of ACE2 was higher in heart, kidney and lower in small intestine than in WT males (Fig. 2d, f). The expression of the truncated ACE2 was also differentially affected by p53 deficiency, as most evidently shown by its absence in the small intestine of flTP53 R167H females (Fig. 2c and d).

4. Discussion

The sex-related COVID-19 mortality is the most frequently reported epidemiologic data [18]. The ACE2 is the main receptor of SARS-CoV-2 and its double-edged role as both an infection-promoting factor and a disease-protective agent has been suggested [19]. So far, the gender-specific regulation of ACE2 is not fully understood.

In this study, we showed the tissue- and gender-specific regulation of ACE2 by p53 in pigs. First, a wider expression of ACE2 in female than male pigs was found, which can be explained by hormonal regulation [20]. A positive effect of oestrogen on the ACE2 expression in men’s myocardium was observed [21]. Besides, the expression of ACE2 increases with human age [4], along with changes in the concentrations of sex hormones.

Altogether, our study shows that the tissue-specific expression of ACE2 is similar in humans and pigs, which correlates with the evolutionary conservation of ACE2 structure between these species [10]. Notable, the highest ACE2 expression was found in the small intestine and kidney, a result consistent with data in humans [22].

Little is known about the role of p53 in the regulation of ACE2. An earlier study reported that p53 suppresses the replication of coronavirus through ACE2 degradation in humans [23] and inhibits the interferon-mediated antiviral immunity in pigs [24]. In this study, we show that the absence of the p53 binding site increases the activity of ACE2 promoter in porcine kidney cells. This data was confirmed by increased ACE2 expression in the kidney of flTP53 R167H pigs. We also found a tissue- and gender-specific effect of TP53 knockout on the expression of the full length and truncated ACE2 isoforms.

5. Conclusions

The study provides important findings into gender-specific ACE2 regulation by p53 in pigs. Considering the similarities of TP53 function between pig and human [25], this work provides useful evidence for further studies in human patients.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Alexander Carrapeiro for technical assistance with molecular biology, Steffen and Viola Löbnitz, Gerhard Kammermeier and Konrad Praller for animal husbandry.

References

  • 1.Lai C.C., Shih T.P., Ko W.C., Tang H.J., Hsueh P.R. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19): the epidemic and the challenges. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020;55:105924. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lu H., Stratton C.W., Tang Y.W. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: the mystery and the miracle. J. Med. Virol. 2020;92:401–402. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lei S., Jiang F., Su W., Chen C., Chen J., Mei W., Zhan L.-Y., Jia Y., Zhang L., Liu D., Xia Z.-Y., Xia Z. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing surgeries during the incubation period of COVID-19 infection. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;21:100331. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wong S.H., Lui R.N., Sung J.J. Covid-19 and the digestive system. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2020;35:744–748. doi: 10.1111/jgh.15047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wan Y., Shang J., Graham R., Baric R.S., Li F. Receptor recognition by the novel coronavirus from wuhan: an analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS coronavirus. J. Virol. 2020;94 doi: 10.1128/JVI.00127-20. e00127-00120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wrapp D., Wang N., Corbett K.S., Goldsmith J.A., Hsieh C.-L., Abiona O., Graham B.S., McLellan J.S. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science. 2020;367:1260–1263. doi: 10.1126/science.abb2507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ziegler C.G.K., Allon S.J., Nyquist S.K., Mbano I.M., Miao V.N., Tzouanas C.N., Cao Y., Yousif A.S., Bals J., Hauser B.M., Feldman J., Muus C., Wadsworth M.H., 2nd, Kazer S.W., Hughes T.K., Doran B., Gatter G.J., Vukovic M., Taliaferro F., Mead B.E., Guo Z., Wang J.P., Gras D., Plaisant M., Ansari M., Angelidis I., Adler H., Sucre J.M.S., Taylor C.J., Lin B., Waghray A., Mitsialis V., Dwyer D.F., Buchheit K.M., Boyce J.A., Barrett N.A., Laidlaw T.M., Carroll S.L., Colonna L., Tkachev V., Peterson C.W., Yu A., Zheng H.B., Gideon H.P., Winchell C.G., Lin P.L., Bingle C.D., Snapper S.B., Kropski J.A., Theis F.J., Schiller H.B., Zaragosi L.E., Barbry P., Leslie A., Kiem H.P., Flynn J.L., Fortune S.M., Berger B., Finberg R.W., Kean L.S., Garber M., Schmidt A.G., Lingwood D., Shalek A.K., Ordovas-Montanes J., H.C.A.L.B.N.E.a. lung-network@humancellatlas.org. H.C.A.L.B. Network SARS-CoV-2 Receptor ACE2 is an interferon-stimulated gene in human airway epithelial cells and is detected in specific cell subsets across tissues. Cell. 2020;181:1016–1035 e1019. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.04.035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dai Y.J., Hu F., Li H., Huang H.Y., Wang D.W., Liang Y. A profiling analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different type of cancers vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Ann. Transl. Med. 2020;8:481. doi: 10.21037/atm.2020.03.61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Singh M., Bansal V., Feschotte C. A single-cell RNA expression map of human coronavirus entry factors. Cell Rep. 2020:32. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sang E.R., Tian Y., Gong Y., Miller L.C., Sang Y. Integrate structural analysis, isoform diversity, and interferon-inductive propensity of ACE2 to predict SARS-CoV2 susceptibility in vertebrates. Heliyon. 2020;6 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Subbiah V. A global effort to understand the riddles of COVID-19 and cancer. Nat. Can. (Que.) 2020;1:943–945. doi: 10.1038/s43018-020-00129-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hong B., van den Heuvel A.P., Prabhu V.V., Zhang S., El-Deiry W.S. Targeting tumor suppressor p53 for cancer therapy: strategies, challenges and opportunities. Curr. Drug Targets. 2014;15:80–89. doi: 10.2174/1389450114666140106101412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mantovani F., Collavin L., Del Sal G. Mutant p53 as a guardian of the cancer cell. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:199–212. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0246-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Delbridge A.R.D., Kueh A.J., Ke F., Zamudio N.M., El-Saafin F., Jansz N., Wang G.Y., Iminitoff M., Beck T., Haupt S., Hu Y., May R.E., Whitehead L., Tai L., Chiang W., Herold M.J., Haupt Y., Smyth G.K., Thomas T., Blewitt M.E., Strasser A., Voss A.K. Loss of p53 causes stochastic aberrant X-chromosome inactivation and female-specific neural tube defects. Cell Rep. 2019;27:442–454. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.048. e445. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ji Y., Gao F., Sun B., Hao J., Liu Z. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 inhibits apoptosis of pulmonary endothelial cells during acute lung injury through suppressing SMAD2 phosphorylation. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. : international journal of experimental cellular physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology. 2015;35:2203–2212. doi: 10.1159/000374025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Saalfrank A., Janssen K.P., Ravon M., Flisikowski K., Eser S., Steiger K., Flisikowska T., Müller-Fliedner P., Schulze É., Brönner C., Gnann A., Kappe E., Böhm B., Schade B., Certa U., Saur D., Esposito I., Kind A., Schnieke A. A porcine model of osteosarcoma. Oncogenesis. 2016;5:e210. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2016.19. -e210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gallelli L., Zhang L., Wang T., Fu F. Severe acute lung injury related to COVID-19 infection: a review and the possible role for escin. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2020;60:815–825. doi: 10.1002/jcph.1644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Guan W.J., Ni Z.Y., Hu Y., Liang W.H., Ou C.Q., He J.X., Liu L., Shan H., Lei C.L., Hui D.S.C., Du B., Li L.J., Zeng G., Yuen K.Y., Chen R.C., Tang C.L., Wang T., Chen P.Y., Xiang J., Li S.Y., Wang J.L., Liang Z.J., Peng Y.X., Wei L., Liu Y., Hu Y.H., Peng P., Wang J.M., Liu J.Y., Chen Z., Li G., Zheng Z.J., Qiu S.Q., Luo J., Ye C.J., Zhu S.Y., Zhong N.S., China Medical Treatment C. Expert group for, clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Foresta C., Rocca M.S., Di Nisio A. Gender susceptibility to COVID-19: a review of the putative role of sex hormones and X chromosome. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2020 doi: 10.1007/s40618-020-01383-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Dalpiaz P.L., Lamas A.Z., Caliman I.F., Ribeiro R.F., Jr., Abreu G.R., Moyses M.R., Andrade T.U., Gouvea S.A., Alves M.F., Carmona A.K., Bissoli N.S. Sex hormones promote opposite effects on ACE and ACE2 activity, hypertrophy and cardiac contractility in spontaneously hypertensive rats. PloS One. 2015;10 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Bukowska A., Spiller L., Wolke C., Lendeckel U., Weinert S., Hoffmann J., Bornfleth P., Kutschka I., Gardemann A., Isermann B., Goette A. Protective regulation of the ACE2/ACE gene expression by estrogen in human atrial tissue from elderly men. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017;242:1412–1423. doi: 10.1177/1535370217718808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bunyavanich S., Do A., Vicencio A. Nasal gene expression of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in children and adults. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2020;323:2427–2429. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.8707. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ma-Lauer Y., Carbajo-Lozoya J., Hein M.Y., Müller M.A., Deng W., Lei J., Meyer B., Kusov Y., von Brunn B., Bairad D.R., Hünten S., Drosten C., Hermeking H., Leonhardt H., Mann M., Hilgenfeld R., von Brunn A. p53 down-regulates SARS coronavirus replication and is targeted by the SARS-unique domain and PLpro via E3 ubiquitin ligase RCHY1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2016;113:E5192–E5201. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1603435113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hao Z., Fu F., Cao L., Guo L., Liu J., Xue M., Feng L. Tumor suppressor p53 inhibits porcine epidemic diarrhea virus infection via interferon-mediated antiviral immunity. Mol. Immunol. 2019;108:68–74. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2019.02.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Niu G., Hellmuth I., Flisikowska T., Pausch H., Rieblinger B., Carrapeiro A., Schade B., Böhm B., Kappe E., Fischer K., Klinger B., Steiger K., Burgkart R., Bourdon J.-C., Saur D., Kind A., Schnieke A., Flisikowski K. Porcine model elucidates function of p53 isoform in carcinogenesis and reveals novel circTP53 RNA. Oncogene. 2021;40(10):1896–1908. doi: 10.1038/s41388-021-01686-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES