Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248707

Drug-resistant TB prevalence study in 5 health institutions in Haiti

Jonathan Hoffmann 1,*,#, Carole Chedid 1,2,#, Oksana Ocheretina 3,4, Chloé Masetti 5, Patrice Joseph 4, Marie-Marcelle Mabou 4, Jean Edouard Mathon 4, Elie Maxime Francois 4, Juliane Gebelin 5, François-Xavier Babin 5, Laurent Raskine 5, Jean William Pape 4
Editor: Shampa Anupurba6
PMCID: PMC7971505  PMID: 33735224

Abstract

Objectives

Tuberculosis (TB) is the leading infectious cause of death in the world. Multi-drug resistant TB (MDR-TB) is a major public health problem as treatment is long, costly, and associated to poor outcomes. Here, we report epidemiological data on the prevalence of drug-resistant TB in Haiti.

Methods

This cross-sectional prevalence study was conducted in five health centers across Haiti. Adult, microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB patients were included. Molecular genotyping (rpoB gene sequencing and spoligotyping) and phenotypic drug susceptibility testing were used to characterize rifampin-resistant MTB isolates detected by Xpert MTB/RIF.

Results

Between April 2016 and February 2018, 2,777 patients were diagnosed with pulmonary TB by Xpert MTB/RIF screening and positive MTB cultures. A total of 74 (2.7%) patients were infected by a drug-resistant (DR-TB) M. tuberculosis strain. Overall HIV prevalence was 14.1%. Patients with HIV infection were at a significantly higher risk for infection with DR-TB strains compared to pan-susceptible strains (28.4% vs. 13.7%, adjusted odds ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.5–4.4, P = 0.001). Among the detected DR-TB strains, T1 (29.3%), LAM9 (13.3%), and H3 (10.7%) were the most frequent clades. In comparison with previous spoligotypes studies with data collected in 2000–2002 and in 2008–2009 on both sensitive and resistant strains of TB in Haiti, we observed a significant increase in the prevalence of the drug-resistant MTB Spoligo-International-Types (SIT) 137 (X2 clade: 8.1% vs. 0.3% in 2000–02 and 0.9% in 2008–09, p<0.001), 5 (T1 clade: 6.8% vs 1.9 in 2000–02 and 1.7% in 2008–09, P = 0.034) and 455 (T1 clade: 5.4% vs 1.6% and 1.1%, P = 0.029). Newly detected spoligotypes (SIT 6, 7, 373, 909 and 1624) were also recorded.

Conclusion

This study describes the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of DR-TB strains circulating in Haiti from April 2016 to February 2018. Newly detected MTB clades harboring multi-drug resistance patterns among the Haitian population as well as the higher risk of MDR-TB infection in HIV-positive people highlights the epidemiological relevance of these surveillance data. The importance of detecting RIF-resistant patients, as proxy for MDR-TB in peripheral sites via molecular techniques, is particularly important to provide adequate patient case management, prevent the transmission of resistant strains in the community and to contribute to the surveillance of resistant strains.

Introduction

Tuberculosis (TB) is a communicable disease caused by Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB). It is the leading infectious cause of death worldwide. In 2018, the death toll for TB among HIV-negative people was estimated to be 1.2 million, with an additional 251 000 deaths among HIV-positive people. The estimated global burden for the same year was about 10 million new cases [1]. Currently, about a quarter of the global population is latently infected, and at risk of developing active TB.

Although the Americas accounted only for 3% of the global TB cases in 2018, Haiti is one of the countries with the highest TB incidence in the Western hemisphere. In 2018, the country reported an incidence of 176 cases per 100,000 population, of which approximately 15% were cases of TB/HIV coinfection [2]. In Haiti, the mortality due to TB is estimated to be 9.2 per 100 000 population for HIV-negative patients, and 7.7 per 100 000 population for HIV-positive patients [3]. The overall HIV prevalence is 2% and has remained stable in the past years, with 160,000 people living with HIV in 2018 including about 8,400 to 10,000 adolescents for whom tailored interventions are needed to improve retention in care [4,5].

The definition of Multi Drug Resistance TB (MDR-TB) refers to strains that show resistance to at least both Rifampicin (RIF) and Isoniazid (INH) two of the primary four drugs used in TB treatment, whilst Drug Resistant TB (DR-TB) is may refer to strains that are resistant to one or more drugs used in TB treatment. ln Haiti, MDR-TB infections are a major public health issue as the treatment and the risk of poor outcomes are starkly increased [6,7]. The case management of such patients is costly for local healthcare systems and threatens to negatively impact of the progress made in the recent years in the fight against TB in Haiti [8]. In 2018 in Haiti, 94 patients were diagnosed with laboratory-confirmed MDR-TB or Rifampin Resistant TB (RR-TB) incidence of 5.1 per 100 000 population), and 91 were started on treatment [3]. There are two existing centers for the treatment of these patients in Haiti, and the capacity to perform Drug Susceptibility Testing (DST) to detect MDR-TB in Haiti remains limited outside the capital city of Port au Prince (Ouest department). However, since 2014, several peripheral laboratories have been equipped with GeneXpert® Systems (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, USA), enabling the molecular detection of rifampin resistant strains. Rifampin resistance serves as a proxy for MDR-TB diagnosis in low-resource settings. In December 2019, 27 public laboratories and subsidized health institutions across the country had access to GeneXpert machines.

In Haiti, the number of patients infected with Rifampin resistant MTB remains difficult to estimate [9]. Available studies on this topic mainly focus on the urban population of Port au Prince [6,10]. The present study was designed in collaboration with the National TB Program and the National Public Health Laboratory in 2014, and involved five health institutions located in the department of Ouest (GHESKIO INLR and GHESKIO IMIS), Nord (Hôpital Justinien du Cap Haïtien—HUJ), Sud (Hôpital Immaculée Conception des Cayes—HIC), and Centre (Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais—HUM). The general objective was to report the prevalence of DR-TB in these five study sites. For surveillance purposes, this study aimed to characterize the DR-TB strains circulating in Haiti from April 2016 to February 2018.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Weill Cornell Medical College (New York, USA), the Institutional Review Board of GHESKIO Centres (Port-au-Prince, Haiti) and the Haitian National Committee of Bioethics. Clinical and epidemiological data were extracted from patients’ charts. As this was a retrospective clinical chart review, the requirement for informed consent was waived by the institutional review boards.

Study sites

Five health institutions were selected to participate in the present study, based on the availability of a functional GeneXpert® System (Cepheid, Sunnyvale, USA) on site and considered to have large catchment areas for the population. The geographic distribution of the sites allowed to cover four out of 10 departments: Ouest (GHESKIO INLR and GHESKIO IMIS), Nord (Hôpital Justinien du Cap Haïtien—HUJ), Sud (Hôpital Immaculée Conception des Cayes—HIC) and Centre (Hôpital Universitaire de Mirebalais—HUM). Exclusion criteria included age under 15, negative smear microscopy, and signs of extrapulmonary TB.

Tuberculosis screening and diagnostic algorithm

In the five participating health institutions, social workers administered a symptom checklist enquiring about chronic cough lasting ≥ 2 weeks, as well as other TB symptoms. Individuals who reported chronic cough were separated from other patients and referred for same-day physician evaluation. In the peripheral sites (HIC, HUJ, HUM), three sputum samples were collected per TB suspect: two were collected during the first consultation, then a sterile container was given to the patient for collection of the third specimen the next morning. Smear microscopy (Ziehl-Neelsen staining) was conducted. The third sputum specimen was refrigerated upon collection and transported to the biosafety level-3 Rodolphe Mérieux Reference Laboratory in the GHESKIO IMIS (Port-au-Prince). Xpert MTB/RIF testing was done directly on an early-morning specimen, in accordance with guidelines from the Haitian Ministry of Health [11] and the manufacturer’s instructions. A single positive result from the smear examination led to the initiation of anti-TB treatment. HIV testing was conducted using rapid antibody tests (Determine; Alere, Waltham, MA, USA). The protocol conducted by the GHESKIO centers (INLR and IMIS) was slightly different as only two sputum specimens were collected per patient, and no microscopy testing was performed. Following internal diagnostics protocol, a digital chest radiograph (CXR) was performed on-site combined with Xpert MTB/RIF testing. All sputum specimens collected in the present study were cultured on liquid media (BACTEC MGIT 960, Becton Dickenson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and solid media (Lowenstein-Jensen).

Phenotypic and genotypic drug-resistant TB assessment

DST to first- and second-line anti tuberculosis drugs was conducted for all samples with rifampin resistance detected by Xpert MTB/RIF. First-line DST was performed with BACTEC MGIT 960 SIRE and PZA kits as previously described [12]. Drug-resistant TB strains were further characterized using an in-house Luminex PCR-based spoligotyping assay and by rpoB gene sequencing as previously described [12,13]. Spoligotype International Type (SIT) patterns were assigned using the SITVIT2 database [14].

Data analysis

Sociodemographic information, TB diagnosis and HIV status were collected using standardized clinical report forms. Data were cleaned and analyzed in R studio software (version 3.6.2). As the sample size was small, discrete variables were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact test with Bonferroni’s post-hoc [15]. Normal, continuous variables were analyzed using Student’s t-test. Non-normal, continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis rank tests with Dunn’s post-hoc [16] when necessary. For logistic regression, if missing data exceeded 10% of the sample size, the variable was not considered. Otherwise, missing data were replaced by the most frequent group (categorical variables) or the mean (continuous variables). Predictors were first evaluated in univariate logistic analyses, then models were adjusted for sociodemographic factors.

Results

Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the participants

From April 2016 to February 2018, 2,777 microbiologically confirmed pulmonary TB patients were enrolled in five study sites across Haiti. Initially, the aim of the study was to enroll 1,000 new TB patients and 250 re-treatment cases, with equal sampling from each site. However, country-wide strike movements hindered patient recruitment in peripheral study sites, prompting increased recruitment in central GHESKIO clinical centers (IMIS and INLR), hence the unequal sample size per site. All study sites were comparable regarding the age, sex ratio, and HIV prevalence of recruited participants (Table 1). The prevalence of HIV was 14.1% (391/2764). The frequency of retreatment was unequal between sites, with a lower frequency in the HUJ and HUM centers (center and northern sites) compared to the remaining three sites. Among the 2,777 TB patients diagnosed with the Xpert MTB/RIF molecular test, 74 (2.7%) had TB isolates displayed a concordant genotypic/phenotypic DR-TB profiles. The prevalence of detected DR-TB strains was higher in te IMIS center compared to the rest of the partner sites.

Table 1. Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of the cohort.

ALL INLR HIC HUJ HUM IMIS P
NT = 2777 NT = 2049 NT = 148 NT = 50 NT = 75 NT = 455
Age (years), median (IQR) 31 (24–40) 31 (25–41) 28.5 (23–39) 27 (23–40.75) 31 (24.5–44.5) 30 (23–39) 0.132
Sex (male), % (N) 56.6% (1572/2777) 58.1% (1190/2049) 55.4% (82/148) 60% (30/50) 50.7% (38/75) 51% (232/455) 0.060
HIV positivity, % (N) 14.1% (391/2764) 14.2% (291/2044) 19.9% (29/146) 12% (6/50) 11.4% (8/70) 12.6% (57/454) 0.272
Treatment category
 New cases, % (N) 86.5% (2401/2777) 85.8% (1759/2049) 84.5% (125/148) 96% (48/50) 96% (72/75) 87.3% (397/455) 0.014
 Relapse, % (N) 8.5% (236/2777) 8.5% (175/2049) 13.5% (20/148) 2% (1/50) 4% (3/75) 8.1% (37/455) 0.058
 Treatment after interruption % (N) 4% (110/2777) 4.5% (92/2049) 1.4% (2/148) NA NA 3.5% (16/455) 0.049
 Treatment after failure, % (N) 1.1% (30/2777) 1.1% (23/2049) 0.7% (1/148) 2% (1/50) NA 1.1% (5/455) 0.823
Drug resistance, % (N) 2.7% (74/2758) 1.7% (34/2045) 0.7% (1/138) 4.1% (2/49) 4.2% (3/71) 7.5% (34/455) <0.001

Data were analyzed using Fisher’s Exact text or the Mann-Whitney U test (p-values given for all categories). Pairwise differences were assessed using Bonferroni or Dunn’s post hoc. Stars indicate statistically different groups.

Phenotypic diversity of detected drug-resistant TB strains

Among the 74 drug-resistant TB strains identified by DST, 12 strains (16.2%) displayed a mono-resistance to at least 1 antibiotic (drug-resistant TB strain; DR-TB) and 62 strains (83.8%) displayed a multi-drug resistant (MDR-TB) profile (defined by resistance to at least rifampin and isoniazid). Resistance phenotypes to INH and RIF were predominant (87.8% and 91.9%, respectively).

Details of monoresistance and multi-drug resistant profiles are shown in S1 Table and S1 Fig. Sixty-two (83.8%) DR-TB strains were identified in new TB cases, 11 (14.9%) in relapse TB cases, and 1 (1.4%) in subjects under retreatment after failure (Table 2).

Table 2. Comparison of drug-susceptible and resistant TB patients and evaluation of associated risk factors.

Total Drug sensitive Drug resistant Logistic regression—association with drug resistance
Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis*
NT = 2777 NT = 2684 NT = 74 P OR 2.50% 97.50% P aOR lower upper P AIC
Sex (male) 56.6% (1572/2777) 56.9% (1526/2684) 51.4% (38/74) 0.345 0.855 0.616 1.188 0.347 - - - - -
HIV positivity 14.1% (391/2764) 13.7% (365/2672) 28.4% (21/74) 0.002 2.504 1.463 4.139 0.001 2.585 1.478 4.383 0.001 643.28
Age (years; median, IQR) 31 (24–40) 30.5 (24–40) 33 (24–43.75) 0.313 1.012 0.995 1.029 0.162 - - - - -
Treatment category
 New cases 86.5% (2401/2777) 86.7% (2328/2684) 83.8% (62/74) 0.486 0.79 0.437 1.553 0.462 0.756 0.152 13.737 0.788 650.37
 Relapse 8.5% (236/2777) 8.2% (219/2684) 14.9% (11/74) 0.052 1.965 0.968 3.636 0.043 1.397 0.247 26.408 0.756 650.37
 Treatment after interruption 4% (110/2777) 4.1% (109/2684) 0 0.118 0 0 5789.26 0.981 - - - - -
 Treatment after failure 1.1% (30/2777) 1% (28/2684) 1.4% (1/74) 0.547 1.299 0.072 6.216 0.798 0 0 2529.87 0.98 650.37

Data were compared with Fisher’s Exact Test. OR: odds ratio. aOR: Adjusted odds ratio. IQR: Interquartile range. AIC: Akaike Information Criterion.

*Models were adjusted for age, sex, and study site. Fifteen out of 2,777 smear-positive samples were tested GeneXpert MTB/RIF negative (MTB not detected) and 4 isolates could not be cultured for DST.

Comparison of clinical and sociodemographic factors between drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB patients

We then compared the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics of DR-TB and DS-TB patients. Patient characteristics were comparable (age group, sex ratio, and treatment category), but HIV prevalence was significantly higher in DR-TB patients (28.4% vs. 13.7%, p = 0.002) (Table 2). Logistic regression analyses confirmed that HIV-positive patients recruited in this cohort were at higher risk for detection of DR-TB strains. After adjusting for age, sex, and study site of recruitment, HIV-positive patients were 2.5 times more likely to be diagnosed with DR-TB than HIV-negative patients.

Diversity of circulating drug-resistant MTB strains

The repartition of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains in Haiti during this study period was then assessed (Fig 1). T1, LAM9, LAM1 and H3 were the most frequently detected clades among all DR-TB patients. In the two sites with the most recruited patients (GHESKIO IMIS and INLR), T1 was also the most frequently detected clade, however, a greater diversity of clades was observed in the INLR center. Frequencies of detected DR-TB clades and spoligotypes were compared with data collected in 2002 and in 2009 [13] (Table 3). The prevalence of X2 strains (SIT 137) significantly increased from 0.3% and 0.9% in 2002 and 2009, respectively, to 8.1% (6/74) in our study (P <0.001). Three of these strains had the same resistance phenotype (STR+INH+RIF+EMB+ETH), the same rpoB mutation (S531L), and were detected in the same study site (GHESKIO INLR) (Table 4). A similar phenomenon was observed with T1 strains (SIT 5), carrying the D516V rpoB mutation, with the same resistance profiles (STR+INH+RIF+EMB), and detected in the same site (GHESKIO INLR). Moreover, we recorded rare occurrences of MDR-TB strains that were not detected in these previous studies (T1 SIT 373 and 7, LAM SIT 1624, EAI-SOM SIT 6 and SIT 909 with unknown clade) among new TB cases (S2 Table). Finally, some of the strains that were highly prevalent in previous works (LAM2) were less frequent in our study (1.4% vs. 5.8% in 2002 and 4.4% in 2009).

Fig 1. Repartition of drug-resistant M. tuberculosis clades in Haiti (n = 74).

Fig 1

Geographic repartition of DR-TB clades in partner study sites. Data are given for all patients with known spoligotypes. Pie chart size correlates with sample size in each site (Gheskio: n = 34. IMIS: n = 34. HUM: n = 3. HUJ: n = 2. HIC: n = 1).

Table 3. Spoligotyping data of TB isolates in Haiti.

SIT Clade TB isolates N (%)
2000–2002* 2008–2009* 2016–2018
NT = 379 NT = 758 NT = 74** P
42 LAM9 27 (7.1) 54 (7.1) 10 (13.5) 0.149
53 T1 27 (7.1) 46 (6.1) 7 (9.5) 0.433
93 LAM5 15 (4) 33 (4.4) 7 (9.5) 0.135
20 LAM1 26 (6.9) 42 (5.5) 4 (5.4) 0.693
91 X3 29 (7.7) 31 (4.1) 5 (6.8) 0.031
137 X2 1 (0.3) 7 (0.9) 6 (8.1) <0.001
5 T1 7 (1.9) 13 (1.7) 5 (6.8) 0.034
50 H3 37 (9.8) 79 (10.4) 2 (2.7) 0.084
455 T1 6 (1.6) 8 (1.1) 4 (5.4) 0.029
2 H2 37 (9.8) 72 (9.5) 3 (4.1) 0.287
77 T1 4 (1.1) 11 (1.5) 3 (4.1) 0.149
51 T1 17 (4.5) 26 (3.4) 2 (2.7) 0.671
294 H3 1 (0.3) 2 (0.3) 2 (2.7) 0.039
408 AFRI_3 - (-) 4 (0.5) 1 (1.4) 0.019
17 LAM2 22 (5.8) 33 (4.4) 1 (1.4) 0.218
373 T1 - (-) - (-) 1 (1.4) 1.000
578 LAM1 3 (0.8) 7 (0.9) 1 (1.4) 0.761
714 H3 4 (1.1) 3 (0.4) 1 (1.4) 0.189
909 No clade - (-) - (-) 1 (1.4) 1.000
1624 LAM - (-) - (-) 1 (1.4) 1.000
6 EAI-SOM - (-) - (-) 1 (1.4) 0.061
7 T1 - (-) - (-) 2 (2.7) 0.003

*Data from Ocheretina, O. et al. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 51, 2232–2237 (2013). Both studies include DS and DR-TB strains.

**4 samples failed to generate an interpretable pattern (SIT). SIT and Clades were retrieved from the SITVIT2 international database. Data were compared with Fisher’s Exact Test.

Table 4. Description of DR-TB cases and characterization of genotypic and phenotypic drug-resistances by SIT.

SIT CLADE SITE PID AGE SEX TREATMENT CATEGORY HIV status rpoB mutation Drug Susceptibility Testing
STR INH RIF EMB PZA ETH
137 X2 GHESKIO GH-0128 62 M N P S531L R R R R S R
GHESKIO GH-0477 25 M N N S531L R R R R S R
GHESKIO GH-0573 68 F N N S531L R R R R S R
IMIS IMIS-040 71 M N N S531L S R R S R R
IMIS IMIS-388 57 F N N S531L S R R R R R
IMIS IMIS-420 19 M R I S531L S R R S R S
5 T1 GHESKIO GH-0235 17 M N P D516V R R R R S S
GHESKIO GH-0269 29 M N N D516V R R R R S S
GHESKIO GH-1017 21 F N N D516V R R R R S S
GHESKIO GH-1980 45 M N N D516V R R R R S S
IMIS IMIS-239 69 F R P S531L S S R S S S
455 T1 GHESKIO GH-0640 26 M R N S531L S S R S S S
IMIS IMIS-344 29 M N P S531L S S R S S S
IMIS IMIS-210 18 M N N S531L R R R R R S
HUM PIH-005 30 M R N S531L R R R R S R

SIT and clades were retrieved from the SITVIT2 international database. Sex: M = male, F = female; Treatment category: N = new case, R = Relapse; HIV status: P = positive; N = Negative; Drug susceptibility testing: R = Resistant; S = Susceptible; Drugs: STR = streptomycin, INH = isoniazid, RIF = Rifampin, EMB = ethambutol, PZA = Pyrazinamide), ETH = ethionamide. The shaded areas represent identical genotypic and phenotypic resistance profiles for the same SIT.

Relationship between rpoB mutation and lineage

rpoB sequencing was performed on DR-TB isolates (S2 Fig). S531L was the most frequently detected mutation (44/74, 59.4%) followed by S531W and D516V (7/74, 9.4% respectively). rpoB mutations were heterogeneously distributed within the detected clades (S3 Fig). As expected, the highest mutation diversity was observed in the most frequent lineage (T1), and the most frequent rpoB mutation (S531L) was detected in every lineage. Interestingly, S531L mutations were detected in at least 50% of isolates for every lineage except LAM9, in which S531W was the most frequent mutation. No difference was observed when stratifying data according to HIV status (data not shown).

Discussion

In this study, we reported the occurrence of DR-TB infections in patient cohorts across five study sites in Haiti. We evaluated their distribution according to selected sociodemographic parameters, and we described the phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of isolated DR-TB strains.

First, we observed that patients living with HIV infection were at a significantly higher risk for infection with DR-TB strains compared to pan-susceptible strains (31% vs. 15%, aOR 2.5, 95%CI 1.5–4.1, p < 0.001). Comparatively, in Haiti, reported rates of HIV infection are of 16% in TB patients regardless of the drug-susceptibility status, and 2% in the general population [17]. Increased epidemiological interactions between HIV and MDR-TB infections compared to pan-susceptible TB infections have been described since the late nineties [18]. Data on this topic in Haiti are scarce, but a 2006 study reported significantly higher rates of MDR-TB in HIV-positive than in HIV-negative patients [7], which is corroborated by our results. The reason for the interactions between HIV and MDR-TB remains unclear: explanatory hypotheses available in the literature include increased anti-TB drug malabsorption in HIV-positive patients, or enhanced fitness of MDR-TB strains compared to pan-susceptible strains in HIV-positive hosts [19]. However, current evidence points to an increase in the risk of primary MDR-TB infection in HIV-positive patients, rather than acquired drug-resistance [20].

Secondly, we studied the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the DR-TB strains isolated from our cohort. Most strains with RIF resistance upon GeneXpert testing also displayed drug or multi-drug resistant phenotypes upon DST. The most frequent resistance phenotypes detected were resistance to Isoniazid and Rifampin, and resistance to all four first line anti-TB drugs. Sequencing analyses identified two high frequency rpoB mutations (S531L and S531W) and 12 low-frequency rpoB mutations on different loci. Five strains with discrepant phenotypic and genotypic results for resistance to RIF were isolated. Strains exhibiting these discrepancies have been described in previous works in Haiti as possibly harboring subcritical levels of resistance to RIF [12,21]. In our cohort, sequencing analyses identified either T508A or silent T508T rpoB mutations in these five discrepant strain isolates, and their SIT numbers were 20 and 50 respectively, which is consistent with earlier findings [12]. In addition, strains harboring a L511P rpoB mutation have been detected in our cohort; while this has been previously found in phenotypically RIF susceptible strains [12], they were phenotypically drug-resistant in our case.

Thirdly, we aimed to identify the MTB clades detected in the cohort’s DR-TB patients. Indeed, molecular epidemiology is now an important tool to determine MTB transmission patterns, as it complements classic epidemiologic contact tracing and allows investigators to better characterize transmission dynamics. In this study, T1, LAM9, LAM1 and H3 were the most frequently detected clades among all DR-TB patients. In the two sites with the most recruited patients (GHESKIO IMIS and INLR), T1 was the most frequently detected clade as well, but increased diversity was observed in the INLR center. These observations are consistent with a review of MTB drug-resistance and associated genotypic clades observed in 3 French Departments of the Caribbean (Guadeloupe, Martinique and French Guiana) over a seventeen-year period (January 1995–December 2011) [22]. This review reports that T, LAM, and H were the most common clades, respectively accounting for 29.9% (358/1199), 23.9% (286/1199), and 22.1% (265/1199) of all DR-TB isolates. Moreover, a previous spoligotyping study of 758 TB strains collected in patients presenting to the 6 largest TB centers in and around Port-au-Prince (2008-to-2009 MDR-TB survey [6]) revealed that H3 (10.4%, SIT 50), H2 (9.5%, SIT 2), LAM9 (7.1%, SIT42), T1 (6.1%, SIT 53) and LAM-1 (5.5%, SIT 20) were the 5 most prevalent clades circulating in Haiti during this period [13]. Other spoligotyping data from a project conducted by GHESKIO and Pasteur Institute Guadeloupe from 2000 to 2002 showed that H3 (9.8%, SIT 50), H2 (9.8%, SIT 2), LAM9 (7.1%, SIT42), T1 (7.1%, SIT 53) and LAM-1 (6.9%, SIT 20) were also the 5 most prevalent TB clades detected in 378 GHESKIO patients [13]. Here, a comparative analysis of DR-TB strains spoligotypes circulating in Haiti revealed a resurgence in the number of cases caused by strains with a previously low prevalence (i.e. SIT 137, 5, 455 and 294) or even unknown (SIT 373, 6, 7 909 and 1624). Phenotypic and genotypic analysis of individual MTB strains revealed several identical patterns of MDR-TB. These observations suggest that patients with genetically identical strains may have been infected by a common index case or may have been part of a larger cluster of cases.

The Luminex spoligotyping method currently used by GHESKIO in combination with the GeneXpert MTB/RIF was adapted as a first-line, high-throughput tool for MTB genotyping in resource-limited countries. Luminex spoligotyping allows real-time typing and can be used for multiple clinical and public health purposes in Haiti, such as epidemiological investigation through community-based active case finding (ACF), contact tracing, and MTB strain characterization during clinical trials of pulmonary MDR-TB treatments [2327]. Data from a 2014–2015 retrospective cohort analysis using the GHESKIO ACF campaign revealed that the prevalence of TB and HIV in slums of Port-au-Prince was respectively four and five times higher than national estimates [23]. Active case finding for TB and HIV should be expanded to other slum populations in Haiti as part of routine programmatic activities to increase the detection rate of TB cases.

Conclusion

Overall, our study showed that people living with HIV in Haiti were particularly at risk for drug-resistant TB, which is a major public health issue on the island. The identified MTB clades were consistent with similar works conducted in the Caribbean, and several MTB clades harboring drug resistance patterns were either newly identified or increasingly detected among the Haitian population. These observations demonstrate that MTB strain genotyping, identification, and surveillance of specific M. tuberculosis SITs are essential to better understand the dynamics of DR-TB strain transmission, and to design adapted TB control measures in Haiti. The use of Xpert MTB/RIF testing increased the detection rate of patients with bacteriologically-confirmed TB, and an additional surrogate spoligotyping method is useful to identify MDR-TB clades among newly diagnosed TB cases, to differentiate reactivation from re-infection, to discover more virulent strains, and to monitor the spread of new types.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Description of DR-TB strains phenotypes among all patients with available DST results.

Total of 74 DR-TB strains including 12 mono-drug resistant strains and 62 multi-drug resistant TB strains. GHESKIO (INLR): n = 34. IMIS: n = 34. HUM: n = 3. HUJ: n = 2. HIC: n = 1. I: Isoniazid. R: Rifampin. S: Streptomycin. E: Ethambutol. PZA: Pyrazinamide. KM: Kanamycin.

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. rpoB genotypic diversity of DR-TB isolates (n = 74).

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Frequency of detected rpoB mutation in each identified drug-resistant M. tuberculosis lineage (n = 74).

Data are given for all patients with known spoligotypes.

(DOCX)

S1 Table. Summary of resistance profiles of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure or treatment after interruption.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Mono-resistance profile of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Multi-resistant profile of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption.

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Summary of resistance profiles of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption.

(DOCX)

S5 Table. Distribution of DR-TB lineages (SIT) among new TB cases, relapse and treatment after failure.

(DOCX)

S1 Dataset

(XLSX)

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to the National Laboratory for Public Health (LNSP) and the National Programme for TB (PNLT) for their collaboration in the design of the study, and to the administrative and laboratory staff in the five participating sites for sample collection and processing.

Data Availability

The data underlying the results presented in the study have been uploaded with the manuscript as supplementary file (excel sheet "Study dataset").

Funding Statement

This project was supported by the SPHaïtiLab project financed by the European Commission via DEVCO under the Supporting Public Health Institutes Programme and by the Fondation Mérieux. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.WHO | Global tuberculosis report 2019. In: WHO [Internet]. World Health Organization; [cited 25 May 2020]. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/.
  • 2.Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Global HIV and TB_Haïti country profile. 2018. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhivtb/where-we-work/haiti/haiti.html.
  • 3.WHO | Tuberculosis country profiles. In: WHO [Internet]. [cited 4 Oct 2017]. http://www.who.int/tb/country/data/profiles/en/.
  • 4.UNICEF. For Every Child, End AIDS, Seventh Stocktaking Report, 2016. 2016. https://www.unicef.org/publications/files/Children_and_AIDS_Seventh_Stocktaking_Report_2016_EN.pdf.pdf.
  • 5.Reif LK, Rivera V, Bertrand R, Rouzier V, Kutscher E, Walsh K, et al. Outcomes across the tuberculosis care continuum among adolescents in Haiti. Public Health Action. 2018;8: 103–109. 10.5588/pha.18.0021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ocheretina O, Morose W, Gauthier M, Joseph P, D’Meza R, Escuyer VE, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012;31: 221–224. 10.1590/s1020-49892012000300006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Joseph P, Severe P, Ferdinand S, Goh KS, Sola C, Haas DW, et al. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis at an HIV testing center in Haiti. AIDS. 2006;20: 415–418. 10.1097/01.aids.0000206505.09159.9a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.WHO | WHO consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. In: WHO [Internet]. World Health Organization; [cited 25 May 2020]. http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2019/consolidated-guidelines-drug-resistant-TB-treatment/en/. [PubMed]
  • 9.Ministère de la santé publique et de la population, République d’Haïti. Rapport statistique 2018. 2019. https://mspp.gouv.ht/site/downloads/Rapport%20Statistique%20MSPP%202018%20version%20web.pdf.
  • 10.Charles M, Vilbrun SC, Koenig SP, Hashiguchi LM, Mabou MM, Ocheretina O, et al. Treatment outcomes for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in post-earthquake Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91: 715–721. 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0161 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ministère de la Santé publique et de la Population. Programme National de Lutte contre la Tuberculose (PNLT): manuel de normes de la tuberculose en Haiti. 2010. https://mspp.gouv.ht/site/downloads/Manuel%20de%20normes%20PNLT.pdf.
  • 12.Ocheretina O, Escuyer VE, Mabou M-M, Royal-Mardi G, Collins S, Vilbrun SC, et al. Correlation between Genotypic and Phenotypic Testing for Resistance to Rifampin in Mycobacterium tuberculosis Clinical Isolates in Haiti: Investigation of Cases with Discrepant Susceptibility Results. PLOS ONE. 2014;9: e90569. 10.1371/journal.pone.0090569 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ocheretina O, Merveille YM, Mabou M-M, Escuyer VE, Dunbar SA, Johnson WD, et al. Use of Luminex MagPlex Magnetic Microspheres for High-Throughput Spoligotyping of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Isolates in Port-au-Prince, Haiti. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2013;51: 2232–2237. 10.1128/JCM.00268-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Couvin D, David A, Zozio T, Rastogi N. Macro-geographical specificities of the prevailing tuberculosis epidemic as seen through SITVIT2, an updated version of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genotyping database. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2019;72: 31–43. 10.1016/j.meegid.2018.12.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim H-Y. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: Chi-squared test and Fisher’s exact test. Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics. 2017;42: 152. 10.5395/rde.2017.42.2.152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Dunn OJ. Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics. 1964;6: 241–252. 10.1080/00401706.1964.10490181 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Center for Disease Control. Haiti Country Profile. 27 Aug 2019 [cited 26 May 2020]. https://www.cdc.gov/globalhivtb/where-we-work/haiti/haiti.html.
  • 18.Ritacco V, Di Lonardo M, Reniero A, Ambroggi M, Barrera L, Dambrosi A, et al. Nosocomial spread of human immunodeficiency virus-related multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Buenos Aires. J Infect Dis. 1997;176: 637–642. 10.1086/514084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Eldholm V, Rieux A, Monteserin J, Lopez JM, Palmero D, Lopez B, et al. Impact of HIV co-infection on the evolution and transmission of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Elife. 2016;5. 10.7554/eLife.16644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Suchindran S, Brouwer ES, Van Rie A. Is HIV infection a risk factor for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis? A systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2009;4: e5561. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ocheretina O, Shen L, Escuyer VE, Mabou M-M, Royal-Mardi G, Collins SE, et al. Whole Genome Sequencing Investigation of a Tuberculosis Outbreak in Port-au-Prince, Haiti Caused by a Strain with a “Low-Level” rpoB Mutation L511P—Insights into a Mechanism of Resistance Escalation. PLOS ONE. 2015;10: e0129207. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Millet J, Baboolal S, Streit E, Akpaka PE, Rastogi N. A First Assessment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Genetic Diversity and Drug-Resistance Patterns in Twelve Caribbean Territories. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014. 10.1155/2014/718496 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rivera VR, Jean-Juste M-A, Gluck SC, Reeder HT, Sainristil J, Julma P, et al. Diagnostic yield of active case finding for tuberculosis and HIV at the household level in slums in Haiti. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2017;21: 1140–1146. 10.5588/ijtld.17.0049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Masur J, Koenig SP, Julma P, Ocheretina O, Durán-Mendicuti MA, Fitzgerald DW, et al. Active Tuberculosis Case Finding in Haiti. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017;97: 433–435. 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Rivera VR, Lu L, Ocheretina O, Jean Juste MA, Julma P, Archange D, et al. Diagnostic yield of active case finding for tuberculosis at human immunodeficiency virus testing in Haiti. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2019;23: 1217–1222. 10.5588/ijtld.18.0835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Walsh KF, Vilbrun SC, Souroutzidis A, Delva S, Joissaint G, Mathurin L, et al. Improved Outcomes With High-dose Isoniazid in Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis Treatment in Haiti. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;69: 717–719. 10.1093/cid/ciz039 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ahmad N, Ahuja SD, Akkerman OW, Alffenaar J-WC, Anderson LF, Baghaei P, et al. Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. The Lancet. 2018;392: 821–834. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31644-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Shampa Anupurba

21 Dec 2020

PONE-D-20-31826

Drug-resistant TB prevalence study in 5 health institutions in Haiti

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. HOFFMANN,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process

Please submit your revised manuscript by Feb 04 2021 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Shampa Anupurba, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please note that all PLOS journals ask authors to adhere to our policies for sharing of data and materials: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability. According to PLOS ONE’s Data Availability policy, we require that the minimal dataset underlying results reported in the submission must be made immediately and freely available at the time of publication. As such, please remove any instances of 'unpublished data' or 'data not shown' in your manuscript and replace these with either the relevant data (in the form of additional figures, tables or descriptive text, as appropriate), a citation to where the data can be found, or remove altogether any statements supported by data not presented in the manuscript.

3. We note that you have indicated that data from this study are available upon request. PLOS only allows data to be available upon request if there are legal or ethical restrictions on sharing data publicly. For information on unacceptable data access restrictions, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-unacceptable-data-access-restrictions.

In your revised cover letter, please address the following prompts:

a) If there are ethical or legal restrictions on sharing a de-identified data set, please explain them in detail (e.g., data contain potentially identifying or sensitive patient information) and who has imposed them (e.g., an ethics committee). Please also provide contact information for a data access committee, ethics committee, or other institutional body to which data requests may be sent.

b) If there are no restrictions, please upload the minimal anonymized data set necessary to replicate your study findings as either Supporting Information files or to a stable, public repository and provide us with the relevant URLs, DOIs, or accession numbers. Please see http://www.bmj.com/content/340/bmj.c181.long for guidelines on how to de-identify and prepare clinical data for publication. For a list of acceptable repositories, please see http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/data-availability#loc-recommended-repositories.

We will update your Data Availability statement on your behalf to reflect the information you provide.

4. Please remove your figures from within your manuscript file, leaving only the individual TIFF/EPS image files, uploaded separately.  These will be automatically included in the reviewers’ PDF.

5.We note that [Figure(s) 1] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a.    You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figure(s) [1] to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license. 

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an "Other" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b.    If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

6. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Line 58-delete 'is' in 'is may refer to... '

Line 61- 'threatens to negatively impact of....' may be rewritten as 'threatens to have negative impact on the progress....'

Line 63- 'TB (RR-TB) incidence...' may be rewritten as 'TB (RR-TB) with an incidence...'

Line 116- 'DST to...' may be rewritten as 'DST of...'

Line 213- delete 'of' in '....reported rates of HIV infection are of 16%...'

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: "Drug-resistant TB prevalence study in 5 health institutions in Haiti"

I congratulate the authors who have brought data on DR-TB in Haiti pertaining to patients and mycobacterial characteristics under difficult circumstances of strike.

From this manuscript it is evident that the authors wanted to conduct this study in five sites across Haiti by enrolling 1000 new and 250 re-treatment TB cases and to characterise the DR-TB isolates further. However, due to strike in the peripheral regions, the study was mainly conducted in the central region, IMIS and INLR (contributing 2504 enrolments) as compared to peripheral regions (273 enrolments) from April 2016 to February 2018. Out of these, 2401 were new cases while 376 were re-treatment cases. I wonder if the samples/patients from the peripheral sites (HIC, HUJ and HUM) were referred to central laboratories for diagnosis to make the title relevant as DR-TB prevalence in regions catered by 5 health institutions.

Minor Comments:

Abstract:

1. Objectives: Please write the objectives of the study clearly.

2. Results: The authors may give their own results only, avoiding comparison with the previous studies that may be done in the discussion part of the main manuscript.

3. Conclusions: The conclusions can be crisp and corroborate the objectives.

Manuscript:

1. Introduction: The part “including about 8400 to 10000 adolescents ------retention in care” may be avoided.

2. Line 59, MDR-TB infections may replaced with MDR-TB disease

3. The case management of such patients is costly for local healthcare systems and threatens to negatively impact of the progress made in the recent years in the fight against TB in Haiti. “of” may be deleted.

4. Line 94 to 95: Exclusion criteria included age under 15, negative smear microscopy, and signs of extrapulmonary TB. This sentence does not match with lines 109 to 110 where it is mentioned “The protocol conducted by the GHESKIO centers (INLR and IMIS) was slightly different as only two sputum specimens were collected per patient, and no microscopy testing was performed”. These two sites were main contributors for the study.

5. Line 136-137: How was sample size of 1250 arrived at? And why did the authors exceed the pre-determined sample size? Do 2777 cases represent all the cases during the study duration that satisfy the inclusion criteria or some other sampling techniques was used considering the strike in the regions.

6. Line 141: unequal between sites may be replaced with unequal among sites.

7. Line 154-156: Please clarify if the study had 62 isolates that were MDR among total 74 DR TB cases and also 62 DR TB isolates that were identified in new TB cases. Please also clarify the type of resistance found in new and re-treatment cases.

8. Table 2: In treatment after interruption, how was p value of 0.118 obtained when there was no DR-TB case?

9. Line 175-184: This part may be shifted to discussion.

10. While you use the word “cohort” in discussion in lines 225, 231 and 237, what do we understand? Can were replace it with “the tested isolates”

11. Line 269, can we make it “detection rate of HIV-TB co-infection”?

12. Conclusions: Please make the conclusions in-line with the objectives.

13. References: Many of the references are in French.

14. Supplementary material Table 1S: In the heading, Treatment column is depicted twice, please make it as Treatment after interruption and Treatment after failure.

15. Table 1S: Resistant to 3AB* - the line total should be 13.

16. Figure 1S: If you give number of isolates also, it will clarify the confusion of MDR-TB cases among total DR-TB cases.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Rahul Narang

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Comments on PLoS One article.docx

PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248707.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


5 Feb 2021

Lyon, February 02nd 2021,

Re: “Drug-resistant TB prevalence study in 5 health institutions in Haiti”

PONE-D-20-31826

Dear Dr. Shampa Anupurba,

We thank you and the reviewers for your constructive comments regarding this manuscript. We found that the Reviewer’s comments were helpful and we have addressed each suggestion to enhance the manuscript overall quality. As recommended, we have resubmitted a revised manuscript and justified our responses to each of the comments below (in blue) for your attention.

“I congratulate the authors who have brought data on DR-TB in Haiti pertaining to patients and mycobacterial characteristics under difficult circumstances of strike.

From this manuscript it is evident that the authors wanted to conduct this study in five sites across Haiti by enrolling 1000 new and 250 re-treatment TB cases and to characterise the DR-TB isolates further. However, due to strike in the peripheral regions, the study was mainly conducted in the central region, IMIS and INLR (contributing 2504 enrolments) as compared to peripheral regions (273 enrolments) from April 2016 to February 2018. Out of these, 2401 were new cases while 376 were re-treatment cases. I wonder if the samples/patients from the peripheral sites (HIC, HUJ and HUM) were referred to central laboratories for diagnosis to make the title relevant as DR-TB prevalence in regions catered by 5 health institutions.

Minor Comments:

Abstract:

1. Objectives: Please write the objectives of the study clearly.

We clarified the objectives of this study which were : “The main objectives are to report epidemiology of TB in Haiti from April 2016 to February 2018 and depict molecular genotyping and phenotyping of drug-resistant TB isolates.”

2. Results: The authors may give their own results only, avoiding comparison with the previous studies that may be done in the discussion part of the main manuscript.

This is indeed a good point, we have moved the following paragraph into the discussion: “In comparison with previous spoligotypes studies with data collected in 2000-2002 and in 2008-2009 on both sensitive and resistant strains of TB in Haiti, we observed a significant increase in the prevalence of the drug-resistant MTB Spoligo-International-Types (SIT) 137 ( X2 clade : 8.1% vs. 0.3% in 2000-02 and 0.9% in 2008-09, p<0.001), 5 (T1 clade: 6.8% vs 1.9 in 2000-02 and 1.7% in 2008-09, P=0.034) and 455 (T1 clade: 5.4% vs 1.6% and 1.1%, P=0.029). Newly detected spoligotypes (SIT 6, 7, 373, 909 and 1624) were also recorded.”

3. Conclusions: The conclusions can be crisp and corroborate the objectives.

We have reformulated the conclusions of this abstract as follows: “Overall, this epidemiological surveillance study reveals an active circulation of drug-resistant TB isolates in the Haitian population, of new or well-known genotypes. In this study, the risk of infection with DR-TB isolates is higher in HIV-positive individuals. This study underscores the importance of routine screening and genotyping of tuberculosis isolates at peripheral sites using molecular techniques to provide adequate patient care, prevent transmission of resistant strains in the community, and contribute to the surveillance of resistant strains”

Manuscript:

4. Introduction: The part “including about 8400 to 10000 adolescents ------retention in care” may be avoided.

We agree, we have withdrawn the following statement: “including about 8,400 to 10,000 adolescents for whom tailored interventions are needed to improve retention in care(4,5).”

We have modified the sentence as follows: “The overall HIV prevalence is 2% and has remained stable in the past years, with 160,000 people living with HIV in 2018 (4).”

5. Line 59, MDR-TB infections may replaced with MDR-TB disease

We also agree, we have made the following change: “ln Haiti, MDR-TB diseases are a major public health issue as the treatment and the risk of poor outcomes are starkly increased(6,7).”

6. The case management of such patients is costly for local healthcare systems and threatens to negatively impact of the progress made in the recent years in the fight against TB in Haiti. “of” may be deleted.

Changes: “The case management of such patients is costly for local healthcare systems and threatens to negatively impact the progress made in the recent years in the fight against TB in Haiti(8).”

7. Line 94 to 95: Exclusion criteria included age under 15, negative smear microscopy, and signs of extrapulmonary TB. This sentence does not match with lines 109 to 110 where it is mentioned “The protocol conducted by the GHESKIO centers (INLR and IMIS) was slightly different as only two sputum specimens were collected per patient, and no microscopy testing was performed”. These two sites were main contributors for the study.

You are right, this is an error on our part, the exclusion criteria were as follows (modification line 94): “Exclusion criteria included age under 15, negative Xpert MTB/RIF, and signs of extrapulmonary TB”.

8. Line 136-137: How was sample size of 1250 arrived at? And why did the authors exceed the pre-determined sample size? Do 2777 cases represent all the cases during the study duration that satisfy the inclusion criteria or some other sampling techniques was used considering the strike in the regions.

We have added an explanatory paragraph about this in the Methods (lines 110-119).

Because of the strike, we suspected there would be a lesser geographic diversity among included patients and Mtb strains, which led us to increase recruitment in the central GHESKIO clinical centers (IMIS and INLR) in an attempt to be more exhaustive.

The sampling techniques were the same as planned, so the 2777 cases do represent those cases which satisfy the inclusion criteria.

9. Line 141: unequal between sites may be replaced with unequal among sites.

We have corrected this sentence as follow : “The frequency of retreatment was unequal among sites, with a lower frequency in the HUJ and HUM centers (center and northern sites) compared to the remaining three sites."

10. Line 154-156: Please clarify if the study had 62 isolates that were MDR among total 74 DR TB cases and also 62 DR TB isolates that were identified in new TB cases. Please also clarify the type of resistance found in new and re-treatment cases.

Indeed, this is a point that we have clarified. Briefly, a total of 74 DR-TB strains were identified in this study, of which 12 (16.2%) were characterized as having mono-phenotypic resistance to drugs and 62 (83.8%) with a multi-drug resistant profile. Of the total 74 DR-TB, 62 strains were identified in new cases, 11 in relapses and 1 in a person under retreatment following a treatment failure. Among the 62 DR-TB strains identified in new cases: 54 are considered MDR-TB and 8 as mono-resistant.

We have added 3 tables in the supplementary data: table 2S, 3S and 4S:

- Table 2S: Mono-resistance profile of DR-TB isolates identified in different groups of people (new cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption);

- Table 3S: Multi-resistant profile of DR-TB isolates identified in different groups of people (new cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption)

- Table 4S: Summary of resistance profiles of DR-TB isolates identified in different groups of people (new cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption).

Also, clarification has been brought to the legend of Figure 1S: “Total of 74 DR-TB strains including 12 mono-drug resistant strains and 62 multi-drug resistant TB strains”.

11. Table 2: In treatment after interruption, how was p value of 0.118 obtained when there was no DR-TB case?

This is indeed aberrant and has been withdrawn.

12. Line 175-184: This part may be shifted to discussion.

Agreed. We have rephrased this paragraph and shifted part of it to the Discussion (lines 286-290) to avoid citing article tables in the Discussion.

13. While you use the word “cohort” in discussion in lines 225, 231 and 237, what do we understand? Can were replace it with “the tested isolates”

You are right, we have modified sentences as follow:

- Line 226: “In this study, we reported the occurrence of DR-TB infections in patient cohorts across five study sites in Haiti” � “In this study, we reported the occurrence of DR-TB infections in patients across five study sites in Haiti”.

- line 242 : “Secondly, we studied the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the DR-TB strains isolated from our cohort” � “Secondly, we studied the phenotypic and genotypic diversity of the DR-TB strains isolated from patients”.

- Line 249: “In our cohort, sequencing analyses identified either T508A or silent T508T rpoB mutations in these five discrepant strain isolates, and their SIT numbers were 20 and 50 respectively, which is consistent with earlier findings(12) » � « in the tested isolates…. »

- Line 252: “In addition, strains harboring a L511P rpoB mutation have been detected in our cohort…”� “In addition, strains harboring a L511P rpoB mutation have been detected, while…”

Line 239: “Thirdly, we aimed to identify the MTB clades detected in the cohort’s DR-TB patients” � “Thirdly, we aimed to identify the MTB clades of the tested DR-TB isolates”.

14. Line 269, can we make it “detection rate of HIV-TB co-infection”?

Line 286. We have modified this sentence: “Active case finding for TB and HIV should be expanded to other slum populations in Haiti as part of routine programmatic activities to increase the detection rate of TB cases” � “Active case finding for TB and HIV should be expanded to other slum populations in Haiti as part of routine programmatic activities to increase the detection rate of HIV-TB co-infection.”

15. Conclusions: Please make the conclusions in-line with the objectives.

Thank you for this suggestion, we have rephrased the Abstract conclusion (lines 46-52) and the overall article conclusion (lines 306-321) so that the link with the objectives is clearer.

16. References: Many of the references are in French.

The two references (ref. 8 and 10) are documents in French published by the Ministry of Health and Population in Haiti, they do not exist in English.

17. Supplementary material Table 1S: In the heading, Treatment column is depicted twice, please make it as Treatment after interruption and Treatment after failure.

This has been corrected.

18. Table 1S: Resistant to 3AB* - the line total should be 13.

This has been corrected and we added 3 tables in supplementary material (Table 2S, 3S et 4S).

19. Figure 1S: If you give number of isolates also, it will clarify the confusion of MDR-TB cases among total DR-TB cases.

This has been clarified by adding the following sentence: “Total of 74 DR-TB strains including 12 mono-drug resistant strains and 62 multi-drug resistant TB strains”.

20. We note that [Figure(s) 1] in your submission contain map images which may be copyrighted.

This map has been downloaded from : https://simplemaps.com/resources/svg-ht which is a free, web-optimized, SVG Haiti map. Commercial use allowed. There is no copyright.

__________________________

We have accepted and incorporated the Reviewer’s suggestions and hope that the new version of the manuscript will now be acceptable for publication in PlosOne.

Thank you very much for your kind consideration. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact me.

Sincerely,

Jonathan HOFFMANN

Attachment

Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter_PONE-D-20-31826_Hoffmann.pdf

Decision Letter 1

Shampa Anupurba

4 Mar 2021

Drug-resistant TB prevalence study in 5 health institutions in Haiti

PONE-D-20-31826R1

Dear Dr. HOFFMANN,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Shampa Anupurba, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Thank you for addressing all the comments. This time the manuscript has come up nicely and it will be useful for the readers.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Rahul Narang

Acceptance letter

Shampa Anupurba

10 Mar 2021

PONE-D-20-31826R1

Drug-resistant TB prevalence study in 5 health institutions in Haiti

Dear Dr. Hoffmann:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Shampa Anupurba

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Description of DR-TB strains phenotypes among all patients with available DST results.

    Total of 74 DR-TB strains including 12 mono-drug resistant strains and 62 multi-drug resistant TB strains. GHESKIO (INLR): n = 34. IMIS: n = 34. HUM: n = 3. HUJ: n = 2. HIC: n = 1. I: Isoniazid. R: Rifampin. S: Streptomycin. E: Ethambutol. PZA: Pyrazinamide. KM: Kanamycin.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. rpoB genotypic diversity of DR-TB isolates (n = 74).

    (DOCX)

    S3 Fig. Frequency of detected rpoB mutation in each identified drug-resistant M. tuberculosis lineage (n = 74).

    Data are given for all patients with known spoligotypes.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Table. Summary of resistance profiles of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure or treatment after interruption.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Mono-resistance profile of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption.

    (DOCX)

    S3 Table. Multi-resistant profile of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption.

    (DOCX)

    S4 Table. Summary of resistance profiles of DR-TB isolates identified in new TB cases, relapse, treatment after failure, treatment after interruption.

    (DOCX)

    S5 Table. Distribution of DR-TB lineages (SIT) among new TB cases, relapse and treatment after failure.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Dataset

    (XLSX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Comments on PLoS One article.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Rebuttal Letter_PONE-D-20-31826_Hoffmann.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    The data underlying the results presented in the study have been uploaded with the manuscript as supplementary file (excel sheet "Study dataset").


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES